5thHydroForum03

download 5thHydroForum03

of 8

Transcript of 5thHydroForum03

  • 8/7/2019 5thHydroForum03

    1/8

    Community-Assisted Hydrologic Monitoring: A Kalinga Experience

    Daniel C. Peckley Jr., PhD1), Fides Lovella A. Baddongon2) and Eduardo T. Bagtang, DBM3)

    1) Project Officer V, Kalinga Apayao State College (KASC)Bulanao Campus, Tabuk City, 3800, Philippines

    [email protected]) Institute of Mathematics, Engineering, and Agro-industral Techology, KASC

    Tabuk City, Kalinga, 3800, Philippines

    fides_baddongon @yahoo.com3) Administration, KASC

    Tabuk City, Kalinga, 3800, Philippines

    [email protected]

    Abstract

    Harnessing the hydropower-generation potential of the rivers in the Cordillera Administrative

    Region in Northern Luzon can jumpstart rural development in the region. These resources,

    however, have hardly been tapped and developed due to the historical opposition to

    hydropower projects among the indigenous cultural communities in the area and the lack of

    hydrologic data to establish the energy-generation potential of these rivers.

    This short paper presents a concrete illustration of how an indigenous cultural community has

    become actively involved in hydrologic data gathering and monitoring for a proposed

    hydropower project. Through a deliberate and planned participation of the community in this

    resource-monitoring activity, support for the proposed project have been consolidated amongcommunity members.

    In Kalinga and practically the entire Northern Luzon, much has yet to be done in the area ofhydrologic data gathering and monitoring, whether for water resources allocation, natural

    disaster mitigation or research endeavors related to global cimate change. The experiencepresented herein shows that a practical approach to a supposedly highly technical endeavor

    involves giving due importance to socio-economic factors.

    Keywords: hydrologic data gathering, community involvement and support

    1. Poverty incidence, hydropower development in the Cordillera Administrative Region

    (CAR) and the Upper Tabuk Hydropower Project

    The poorest provinces in Northern Luzon are all in the Cordillera Administrative Region

    (CAR) (See Figure 1), according to a study conducted by the Philippine National Statistical

    Coordination Board (NSCB) in cooperation with the World Bank (NSCB, 2005). These

    provinces, namely Abra, Apayao, Ifugao, Kalinga and Mt. Province, have poverty incidences

    ranging from 0.4270 to 0.5460, the study says. Figures from the local government of Kalinga,

    however, cite a poverty incidence (as of 2007) of 0.7962 for the province, and for its capital

    city, Tabuk, 0.62.

  • 8/7/2019 5thHydroForum03

    2/8

    Coincidentally, electricitycosts per kWh in these five

    poorest provinces are knownto be among the most highest

    in the country. Forhouseholds in Kalinga, for

    example, electricity cost

    (including generation,

    transmission and distribution

    costs) per kWh is around

    PhP10, while in other parts of

    Luzon it is around PhP8 (DPJ

    Engrs, 2008a).

    Known as the watershed

    cradle of Northern Luzon,CAR is rich in waterresources for hydropower

    generation. Developing andharnessing these resources is

    thus one way that poverty canbe reduced and income

    increased in the

    aforementioned provinces. In

    Kalinga alone, the potential

    for small hydropower

    development (excluding very large dam hydropower development) was reported to be around

    141MW (Harza, 1993).

    Despite the potential, especially in Kalinga, these hydropower resources still remain largely

    untapped and undeveloped. This situation can be attributed to the following factors, among

    others:

    a) Social acceptability concerns, including opposition and strong sentiments ofindigenous peoples (IPs) in Kalinga and other provinces in the Cordilleras againsthydropower.

    The history of resistance against hydropower development among Kalingas and other

    IPs in the Cordilleras stems from the following experiences with previous hydropower

    projects, starting in the 1950s, through the turbulent years of the late 1970s and early

    1980s, up to the 1990s:

    a.1) Dislocations and claims of unfulfilled resettlement promises (CPA, 2001; Cario,

    1999; Carranza, 2001);

    a.2) Disrespect of/disregard for indigenous peoples rights and non-recognition of

    their ancestral domain (CPA, 2001; Cario, 1999; Carranza, 2001; DPJ Engrs,

    2008b);and

    Figure 1. Provincial poverty incidence map of NorthernLuzon (National Statistical Coordination Board [NSCB],

    2005

  • 8/7/2019 5thHydroForum03

    3/8

    a.3) Past human rights abuses and killings by the governments military forces whenopposition became strong (CPA, 2001; Cario, 1999; Carranza, 2001; DPJ Engrs,

    2008b).

    b) No available hydrologic data to establish hydropower generation potential. Oppositionto hydropower development and security risks make data gathering difficult, as wasthe case in 1993 when community members did not allow the National Power

    Corporation (NPC), a Philippine government-owned and controlled corporation, to

    install a staff gage to measure streamflow of the Tanudan River in Bgy. Dupag, Tabuk

    City, Kalinga

    It was against this backdrop that LGU Tabuk proposed the Upper Tabuk Hydropower Project

    in Bgy. Dupag. In the 1990s, the NPC introduced the project as the Tanudan D Small

    Hydropower Project, but LGU Tabuk renamed it, as the LGU sought to limit the areas to beaffected by the project within its political jurisdiction. When limited only to its jurisdiction,

    the proposed project, which involves the construction of a 35m high dam along the TanudanRiver, shall have an installed capacity of 10MW and is estimated to generate around 50GWh

    of electricity.

    The host community of the project, which is the Minanga Sub-tribe of Kalinga in Bgy. Dupag,

    was among the Kalinga tribes who resisted the Chico IV Hydropower Project in the 1980s.

    The community also opposed the implementation of the Tanudan D Project, as they claimed

    they were not properly consulted during the feasibility study for the said project. Considering

    this historical context, getting the support of the host community in the current project was a

    paramount concern.

    The objective of this paper is to present how socio-economic factors were considered incoming up to with a methodology to monitor riverflow and rainfall, as part of the ongoing

    comprehensive feasibility study for the proposed project. A preliminary review of the

    ongoing hydrologic monitoring program is also presented.

    2. Description of the community-assisted hydrologic monitoring program

    When the Upper Tabuk Hydropower Project was proposed, the first task was to identify thehost community and its influential elders and leaders. While the host community was made

    aware of the ultimate objective of the proposed project, i.e., to reduce electricity costs in

    Tabuk City, Kalinga, they were also made to understand that under existing laws in the

    country, like the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997, they have rights that have

    to be considered in the development and implementation of the project and they also stand to

    benefit from the revenues that will be generated (DOE, 2002). Two important pre-conditions

    that the community included in the development of the project are that they be continuously

    informed and involved in the project and that the proposed project result in employment and

    livelihood opportunities (DPJ Engrs, 2008b). Evidently, the communitys support for the

    proposed project can be strengthened if and when they can be directly involved and can

    benefit from the activities of the ongoing feasibility study.

    Given the above considerations and the fact that hydrologic monitoring for the proposed

    project is an on-site activity that would involve some significant period of time, themonitoring program was designed such that it would have the following features:

  • 8/7/2019 5thHydroForum03

    4/8

    For monitoring river flow:

    a) A 6-m staff gage1shall be used tomonitor river flow.

    The installation of a

    staff gage involves

    hauling, concrete

    pouring and other

    activities where

    members of the host

    community can earn

    wages (See Photos 1

    and 2).

    Since the installationof the staff gage

    would take 3 to 5days (including

    hauling to the site which is around 2km from where it can be delivered by truck), thisactivity can provide an opportunity to informally interact with members of the

    community, especially

    those who still have

    questions or concerns

    about the proposed project

    and the activities of the

    ongoing feasibility study.

    This was in fact the case

    during the staff gage

    installation. Members of

    the community who had

    concerns on the proposedproject were invited to help

    haul and install the gage,and informal discussions

    with them resulted in mostof their concerns being

    addressed.

    1 The staff gage should be high enough so that it can measure the most likely depth of the Tanudan River during

    extreme events such as Typhoon Ilyang in 1998 and Typhoon Harurot in 2008. According to members of thehost community (Minanga Tribe, Bgy. Dupag, Tabuk City), when Typhoons Ilyang and Harurot struck, thewater levels at the staff gage site were between 4m and 5m from the present water level. The flood marks along

    the river confirm this observation. It was thus decided that the staff gage should have a length of at least 6m.

    Another technical consideration in the design of the staff gage is that it should be installed at site where it willnot be vulnerable to direct hit by flowing debris, e.g. logs. As shown in Photo 1, a natural rocky slope barrierprotects the staff gage from being directly hit by a log.

    Photo 1. Location of staff gage, around 560m downstreamfrom dam site of the proposed Upper Tabuk Hydropower

    Project

    Photo 2. Installation of staff gage with community members

  • 8/7/2019 5thHydroForum03

    5/8

    Photo 3. Mobile phone equipped with digital camera for

    taking daily photos of water elevations

    b) Daily water-level readings using the staff gage shall be recorded manually bycommunity members, who will receive monthly monetary incentives for doing so. To

    ensure that this will be carried out conscientiously, the project team, together with thethe barangay council members and elders, conducted a training for volunteers who

    shall be visiting the staff gage site at 6AM every morning to read and record the waterlevel. Recording by volunteers started on 28 October 2008.

    While an automated water-level data logger system can be more reliable in recording

    the daily fluctuations of the river water level, the site does not have a power supply

    and such system would have to be protected from vandalism. Installing an automated

    and high-tech flow measurement sensor or device with its own powersource, e.g.solar cells, was thereby evidently not a practical solution. Even when an automated

    system can be devised for the project site, it could have been a lot more expensive

    than the installation of the staff gage and the year-round monthly incentives for the

    recorders.

    c) For verification of themanual records, a

    photograph of thestaff gage and water

    elevation shall betaken at every visit

    using a mobile phone

    equipped with a

    digital camera (SeePhoto 3). The digital

    photos, which are

    date- and time-stamped, shall be

    downloaded to a

    personal computer

    (PC).

    For monitoring rainfall and other weather parameters:

    d) The rainfall/weather monitoring system shall be an automated PC-based system.Unlike river water-level monitoring, weather monitoring that involves a number ofweather parameters like rainfall, temperature, humidity and others can be better

    carried out with an automated system.

    e) Operation of the system should be simple. For this particular monitoring program, thesystem that was installed involves only turning the PC on and running the software

    that downloads the weather data and stores it in the PC hard disk.

    f) The PC of the weather monitoring system, when stationed at the barangay hall ofDupag (See Photos 4 and 5), can serve not only as a repository of weather data and

    digital photographs from the river flow monitoring activity (item c above), it can also

    be used for encoding in the drafting and encoding of barangay resolutions and otherofficial documents of the council. Recently, the PC was also used for showing film

  • 8/7/2019 5thHydroForum03

    6/8

    features on damsand hydropower

    projectsproduced by the

    DiscoveryChannel and

    National

    Geographic.

    For a more detailed

    technical description of

    the entire hydrologic

    monitoring program,

    the reader is referred to

    DPJEngrs (2008c).

    3. Results and discussion

    Hydrologic data gatheringusing the staff gage and

    weather monitoring system

    described above has been

    going on for almost 3

    months. Photos 6 show

    samples of digital photos

    of the staff gage, taken

    from Nov. 17 to Nov. 27,

    2008. Figure 2, on the

    other hand, presents dataobtained from the weather

    monitoring system. It isworthwhile to note that

    community volunteershave carried out these

    monitoring activitiesconscientiously and with enthusiasm such that they even take the initiative to remind

    whoever is in charge not to miss visiting the staff gage and turning on the PC to download

    weather data.

    While the hydrologic data being gathered would be very useful in confirming the

    hydropower-generation potential of the proposed project, what is more important in this

    particular project, as would perhaps be in any hydropower or dam projects in CAR, is the

    goodwill that was established with the host community by letting them become active

    participants in the ongoing hydrologic monitoring program. In a meeting that was held

    together with the representatives of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP)

    on January 8, 2008, the host community elders and members expressed a unified and strongdesire and interest in the immediate implementation of the proposed project.

    Photo 4. Rain gage and wind sensor units of a La Crosse

    Professional Weather Station installed beside the Bgy.Council Hall of Dupag, Tabuk City

    Photo 5. Base station of the weather station with PC for data

    logging and controls

  • 8/7/2019 5thHydroForum03

    7/8

    11.17.2008 6:12AM 11.18.2008 6:30AM 11.19.2008 6:23AM 11.20.2008 6:24AM

    11.21.2008 6:38AM 11.21.2008 4:48PM 11.22.2008 6:12AM 11.23.2008 6:27AM

    11.24.2008 6:28AM 11.25.2008 6:12AM 11.26.2008 6:45AM 11.27.2008 6:50AM

    Photo 6. Digital photos of the staff gage taken from Nov. 17, 2008 to Nov. 27, 2008

    Figure 2. Rainfall data from Nov. 15, 2008 to Nov. 29, 2008

  • 8/7/2019 5thHydroForum03

    8/8

    4. Conclusions

    The decision to adopt a hydrologic monitoring program with active participation from thehost community resulted not only in successfully gathering data itself but also in gaining

    stronger support for the proposed Upper Tabuk Hydropower Project. In most areas in CARand perhaps in the entire Northern Luzon, much has yet to be done in the area of hydrologic

    data gathering and monitoring, whether for water resources allocation, natural disaster

    mitigation or research endeavors related to global cimate change. The experience presented

    herein shows that a practical approach to a supposedly highly technical endeavor involves

    giving due importance to socio-economic factors.

    5. Acknowledgement

    The installation of the staff gage and the PC-based weather monitoring system was an

    initiative of the Local Government Unit (LGU) of Tabuk headed by Mayor Camilo T.

    Lammawin Jr.

    6. References

    Asian Development Bank (ADB, 2007): The Philippines: Critical Constraints toDevelopment.

    Carino, J. K. (1999): Dams, Indigenous People and Vulnerable Ethnic Minorities:A Case Study on the Ibaloy People and the Agno River Basin, Province of Benguet,

    Philippines, Contributing Paper, World Commission on Dams.

    Carranza, R. (2001): Memories of a Kalinga elder: Recalling the Past, Confronting

    the Present. http://www.bulatlat.com/news/2-12/2-12-recalling.html.

    Cordillera Peoples Alliance (CPA, 2001): Dams in the Cordillera.

    www.internationalrivers.org/files/021214.corddams.pdf

    Department of Energy (DOE, 2006): Benefits to Host Communities Pursuant to Rule 29,

    EPIRA-IRR.

    DPJ Engineers & Consultants (DPJ Engrs, 2008a): Comparisons among electric bills issued

    by KAELCO in Tabuk City, Kalinga, MERALCO in Quezon City, Metro Manila, and

    QUEZELCO in Gen. Nakar, Quezon.

    DPJ Engineers & Consultants (DPJ Engrs 2008b): Final Report on The Upper Tabuk

    Irrigation and Small Hydropower Project: Comprehensive Feasibility Study Stage I. LGUTabuk City.

    DPJ Engineers & Consultants (DPJ Engrs 2008c): Technical Report on the Installation of aStaff Gage and Weather Monitoring System for the proposed Upper Tabuk Hydropower

    Project. LGU Tabuk City.

    HARZA ENGINEERING COMPANY INTERNATIONAL LP in association

    with INTERNAFIL DEVT & CONSULTANCY, INC. (Harza, 1993): Small Hydropower

    Projects Luzon B, Final Report Vol. I: Main Report, Vol. IV: Tanudan D Project, and

    Appendix A: Hydrology.

    National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB, 2005): Estimation of Local Poverty in the

    Philippines.