5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004
description
Transcript of 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004
![Page 1: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
5th UNTELE conferenceUniversity of CompiègneMarch 2004
An analysis of dyadic discourse within a learning environment designed for learner autonomy
by
David Rees Ph.D.
Institut National d’Horticulture, Angers
www.multimania.com/[email protected]
![Page 2: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2. A typical language lesson
1. The learning environment
3. Negotiation
CONTENTS
4. Vygotsky’s concepts of internalisation and the ZPD
5. Discourse analysis
6. Corpus analysis
7. Results
8. Conclusions
![Page 3: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
‘Grande Ecole’ with two colleges (Bac 0+5 and Bac 2+3)Applied engineering in horticulture and landscaping
2 foreign languages (for specific purposes) with compulsory minimum levels
Compulsory foreign professional training period in Year 1
1. The learning environment
Over 50% of students on inter-university exchanges
Highly positive attitudes for learning foreign languages
![Page 4: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
All lessons in 25-post multimedia rooms, and available via intranet.
![Page 5: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2. A typical language lesson
![Page 6: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Tandberg pilot
![Page 7: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Pedagogy based on Mutual Scaffolding
1. Separate the classinto two equal groups
![Page 8: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2. Select the sources
![Page 9: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Video 1 Video 2
3. Diffuse the sources
![Page 10: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
4. Form intragroup dyadsMacro/micro-comprehension
![Page 11: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
4. Intragroup dyad: micro-comprehension
![Page 12: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
5. Intergroupdyads
(negociation)
![Page 13: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
3. Negotiation
The repeating, rephrasing and restructuring of phrases in L1 or L2 between two or more learners to enable them to understand the meaning of the messages they arecommunicating (Long)Interlanguage (Selinker)
![Page 14: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1
Intragroup negotiation1
1
Student 2 Student 4
Input 1 Input 2
Student 1 Student 3
Intergroup negotiation
2
2
2
![Page 15: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
INFORMATION
GAP
NNS NNS
Negotiation of content
Negotiation of comprehension
![Page 16: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
NNS
linguisticor
semiotic‘self’
NNS
linguisticor
semiotic‘self’
ZPD ZPD
2
negotiation and the ZPD
Each learner assists theother since each hasinternalised differentsemiotic, linguistic orconceptual competences).Mutual scaffolding takes place.
![Page 17: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
5. Discourse Analysis Model
1. Problem source2. Repair type3. Discourse code
![Page 18: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Problem Source
Ph Phonological (caused by pronunciation or accentuation)
Gr Grammatical (caused by the syntax of a word or phrase)
Lx Lexical (caused by unknown or incorrect vocabulary)
Cn Content (caused by lack of comprehension of the content or concept)
Ds Discourse (caused by pragmatic, social or cultural misunderstanding)
Ps Pause (a pause can indicate a problem and incite repair)
Problems can be due to production mistakes or comprehension difficulty
![Page 19: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Repair Type
XL2 Explanation in L2
XL1 Explanation in L1
GT Grammatical Transformation
TL1 Translation into L1
TL2 Translation into L2
Mod Model (the repair is an attempt to provide the ‘correct’ word or form)
Syn Synonym (a synonym or alternate version is provided)
Rep Repetition
Con Confirmation
Com Completion (normally following a pause; the completion of a word or phrase)
![Page 20: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Discourse Codes
SR Self Repair ‘she disperses, it disperses …’
RA Requested Assistance ‘how do you say disseminer’?
RR Response to Request ‘disseminer is to disperse’ / ‘I don’t know’
AC Acceptance ‘disperse, okay’
UR Unrequested Repair A. ‘who mutates ’ B. ‘that mutates’
UA Unrequested Assistance A. ‘It’s a scented fruit’ B. ‘Like the guava’
CC Confirmation Check ‘A power station, okay?’
![Page 21: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
6. Corpus Analysis
![Page 22: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
7. Results
![Page 23: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Negotiation triggers
45% lexical
25% content problems
11% due to silence
![Page 24: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Repair type
15% explanation in L2 15% translation in L1
![Page 25: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
10% repetition 19% confirmation 15% completion
![Page 26: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Discourse type
44% Request for help 20% Unrequested help 23% Confirmation check
![Page 27: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Self-repairs
43% Grammatrical transformation 50% Provision of a model
![Page 28: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Comparison of student/teacher intervention
Mostly grammatical, phoneticand discourse triggers for the teacher
Mostly lexical and content triggersfor the students
![Page 29: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Comparison of teacher / student repair types
Teacher: high degree explanation in L2and provision of correct model
Students: a wide-variety of repair types
Teacher: high level of non-requested aid
Students: high level of aid requests
![Page 30: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Laughter
An average of 10 laughter ‘events’ per dyad per lesson
![Page 31: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
8. Conclusions
Dyadic, task-based pair work maximises negotiation opportunities
Negotiation leads to acquisition
Negotiation is effected by:a) task typeb) familiarity of partnersc) cultural similarity of partners
NNS-NNS negotiation appears to be more suitable than NS-NNS negotiation
Technology can enhance a dyadic learning environment
A technology-structured environment can enhance learner autonomy
![Page 32: 5th UNTELE conference University of Compiègne March 2004](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022070502/56814bd9550346895db8b0f9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
5th UNTELE conferenceUniversity of CompiègneMarch 2004
An analysis of dyadic discourse within a learning environment designed for learner autonomy
by
David Rees Ph.D.
Institut National d’Horticulture, Angers
www.multimania.com/[email protected]