1 Capability Set - Detail. 2 Bb Academic Suite Capability Set by : System.
5.4 CAPABILITY BRIEF...• Capability-based planning • Integrated Warfare Analysis • Cost •...
Transcript of 5.4 CAPABILITY BRIEF...• Capability-based planning • Integrated Warfare Analysis • Cost •...
1
John Kriz
Integrated Battlespace Simulation and Test Department, AIR-5.4
January 25, 2011
Distributed Testing Evolution of the Test Battlespace to Meet Mission Needs
2
LVC – The Test and Evaluation Continuum
Acquisition
Gate
Reviews
Systems Engineering Technical Review Timing
Products
Acquisition
Milestones/
Phases B CAMaterial Solution Analysis (MSA)
System
Architecture &
Technology
Demonstration
Engineering & Manufacturing Development Production &
Deployment
Operations &
Support
LRIP / IOT&E Sustainment & Disposal
Material
Development
Decision
FRP Decision Review
IOC FOCPHASE I PHASE II PHASE IVPHASE III
System
Requirements &
Technology
Development
1 2 3 4 5 6
Pass 1 Pass 2
Service Approved
CDD
Prototypes
Open Air Ranges
Live Assets
Modeling & Simulation
Systems Integration Labs
Installed System Test Facilities
Systems of Systems Drives T&E Needs
to the Left
3
M&S - Prominent Tool for RDT&E
Modeling and Simulation / Ground Testing
• Component Level
• System Level
• Systems-of-Systems Level
Time
Tes
t E
ven
ts
Today
M&S Evolving out of Necessity
4
The Evolution of T&E Capabilities – Just in Time for SoS
SIMULATE
Software-Based
Emulations
STIMULATE
Red/Blue
Hardware
Integration
COLLABORATE
Distributed
Labs/Sites
Integration
“Hub and Spoke”
+ + HARDWARE
Installed System
Assessment
+
• Family-of-Systems
• Systems-of-Systems
• Environment Immersion
• Battlespace Representation
Early Identification and Resolution of Deficiencies
Joint – Complex – Integrated - Collaborative Systems
Today’s Demands
5
Modern Day Testing Challenges
• Platform Avionics Increasing In Complexity
– Drives Increased Test requirements
– Drives Level of Sophistication of Test Capability
– Drives Cost and Schedule
• Funding for T&E Remaining Relatively Constant
– Stresses Test Program Schedules
– Stresses Test Capability Development
– Drives Re-Use and Optimization of Test Program
• New Requirements Emerging for all Programs
– Interoperability
– Net-Centricity
– Drives Need for Innovative Test Methodologies
Systems of Systems Reliant on LVC & Distributed Test Techniques
6
A BATTLESPACE IN TRANSITION
• C4ISR to C5ISR
– Bringing in the Combat System
• SYSTEM CAPABILITY TO MISSION EFFECT
– Eliminating stovepipes
• SERVICE to JOINT / COALITION
– Sharing mission, not just data
• ACTIONABLE DATA to Weapon on TARGET
Integrated
Battlespace
ENSURE KILL CHAIN IS COMPLETE FROM DESIGN TO DEPLOYMENT
Simulation Systems
Integration Labs
Installed System Test
Facilities
Open Air Ranges
Live Assets
5th Generation T&E
5th Gen
Air Vehicle Performance
Weapon Performance
Low Observability
AT
TR
IBU
TE
S
Sensor Performance Passive Detection
All Environments
Information Fusion
Fully Collaborative
On-Board/Off-Board
Speed Stealth Networked “Information Dominance”
DEVELOPMENT, TEST AND EVALUATION
BATTLESPACE INTEROPERABILITY
7
Government
Domain
Contractor
Domain
Integrated Capabilities (Warfighting Effects)
Government Domain
• Procurement Integrity
• Battlespace architect / SE
• Operational
- CONOPS / TTPs
- Mission Architecture
Contractor Domain
• System / Component Domain Expertise
- Design
- Development
- Production
Interoperability of Development Domains Required to Maximize Capability
Battlespace
Integration
8
Diverse technical expertise
• Engineering
• Advanced Technology / R&D
• Capability-based planning
• Integrated Warfare Analysis
• Cost
• Logistics
• Test and Evaluation
Integrated and networked National RDT&E
labs, open-air ranges
Comprehensive Battlespace Environment
• Live-Virtual-Constructive simulation and
stimulation
Operational Focus
• Mission Architecture CE
• CONOPS & TTP
Battlespace Integration Accomplished Through DON Warfare Centers
Government Uniquely Suited for Integrating Systems within Battlespace Environment
People – Processes – Facilities - Ranges
9
10
Fleet Introduction
Battlespace Integration
Joint – Complex – Integrated - Collaborative
SYSTEMS
OF
SYSTEMS
Simulations (DoD, Kr)
Systems Integration Labs (DoD, Kr)
Installed Systems Test Facilities (DoD, Kr)
Open Air Ranges (DoD)
Live Assets (DoD, coalition, other agency)
System Design and Development
Acquisition Process System Focused
Each System Developed to Program Requirements
without assurance of System Interoperability at
Fleet Introduction
Systems of Systems Environment Requires
New and Innovative Approaches throughout
Development to ensure Systems are
Interoperable – Interoperability Must be Built In
Fleet Interoperable
11
Opportunities
• Enhance SYSCOM/Program Collaboration to Further Develop and Refine
Battlespace Environments to Support System-of-Systems Understanding
and Warfare Capability Develpoment
– End-to-End Capability
– Cross-Collaborative Environment
• Transformation to Mission Based Test Design produces an Integrated
Evaluation Framework that shows how a system being developed will be
tested as a component of the SoS.
– Informs the Developer on Intended Use
– Informs the Warfighter on Delivered Capability Performance.
• Leverage the Extensive Standing Collaborative Distributed LVC
Capabilities
– Reuse Reduces Cost
– Use Informs Performance
– Think SoS
Systems No Longer Stand Alone – Don’t Develop and Test That Way