52316-001: Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and ...

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

Reconstruction of Paneki Intake and Raw Water Transmission SubprojectDecember 2020

INO: Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (Component 1: Public Works Infrastructure)

Prepared by the Ministry of Public Works and Housing through Directorate General of Water Resources for the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENT

(as of November 2020) Currency unit - rupiah (Rp) Rp1.00 = $0.0000678408

$1.00 = Rp14,740.40

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank (or the Bank) AHs Affected HouseholdsAPs Affected PersonsBAPPEDA Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Provincial/District

Planning Agency)BPOP Biaya Operasional Biaya Pendukung (Operational Cost)CIKASDA Cipta Karya dan Sumber Daya Air (Human Settlement and

Water Resources)BWS III Balai Wilayah Sungai III (Central for River Basin of Sulawesi

III)COI Corridor of Impact CPMU Central Project Management UnitDED Detailed Engineering DesignDGHS Directorate General of Human Settlements (Direktorat

Jenderal Cipta Karya) DGWR Directorate General of Water Resources (DJSDA/Direktorat

Jenderal Sumber Daya Air) DMS Detailed Measurement SurveyEA Executing AgencyEAL Emergency Assistance LoansEARR Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and ReconstructionFGD Focus Group DiscussionGAPOKTAN Gabungan Kelompok Tani (farmers group)GoI Government of IndonesiaGRM Grievance Redress MechanismHa HectareHHs HouseholdsHuntap Hunian Tetap

1 IA Implementing Agency IOL Inventory of LossesIPs Indigenous PeoplesIR Involuntary ResettlementKATR/BPN Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang Badan Pertanahan

Nasional (Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency)

LARP Land Acquisition and Resettlement PlanLAT Land Acquisition TeamLRP Livelihood Restoration ProgramMPWH Ministry of Public Works and HousingMusrenbang Musyawarah Perencanaan dan Pembangunan (development

planning meeting)O&M Operations & Maintenance

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Huntap is a resettlement area that developed by Central Sulawesi Local Government for disaster victims.

2 This definition is in line with Law No. 39/1999 (Article 5 elucidation) on Human Rights. Vulnerable

P3A Perkumpulan Petani Pemakai Air (water user farmers association)PDAM Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (State-owned water utility

company)PAMSIMAS Penyediaan Air Minum dan Sanitasi Berbasis Masyarakat

(Community based water supply and sanitation program)PASIGALA Palu, Sigi, DonggalaPIB Project Information BookletPIU Project Implementation UnitPMC Project Management ConsultantPMSC Project Management and Supervision ConsultantRCS Replacement Cost StudyRCCDF Resettlement and Customary Communities Development

FrameworkRTRW Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah/Regional Spatial PlanningRWSS Raw Water Supply SystemS3RBO Sulawesi III River Basin Organization (Balai Wilayah Sungai

Sulawesi III)SES Socio-economic SurveySPAM Sistem Pengolahan Air Minum (Drinking Water supply system)SKPT Surat Keterangan Pendaftaran Tanah (Land Registration

Certificate)SPS Safeguards Policy StatementTA Technical AssistanceToR Term of ReferenceUMKM Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (Micro Small and Medium

Enterprise)WTP Water Treatment Plant

DEFENITION OF TERMS

Affected persons (APs)!

Refers to any person or persons, household, firm, private or publicinstitution that, on account of changes resulting from the Project, will have its (i) standard of living adversely affected; (ii) right, title or interest in any house, land (e.g., residential, commercial, agricultural, and/or grazing land), water resources or any other fixed assets acquired, possessed, restricted or otherwise adversely affected, in full or in part, permanently or temporarily; and/or (iii) business, occupation, place of work or residence or habitat adversely affected, with or without physical displacement. In the case of affected household (AH), it includes all members residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by the project.

Census of Affected Persons

The census is a count of all displaced persons irrespective of their titled or non-titled land ownership status. Its purpose is to accurately document the number of displaced persons and to create an inventory of their losses finalized on the basis of a DMS.A census describes the persons who are displaced, theirlivelihoods and income sources, and what they are likely to lose because of the project.

Compensation This is payment given in cash or in kind to AP at replacement cost or at current market value for assets and income sources acquired or adversely affected by the project.

Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS)

With the use of approved detailed engineering drawings, thisactivity involves the finalization and/or validation of the results of the IOL, severity of impacts, and list of APs done during the preparation of this resettlement plan (LARP). The final cost of resettlement will be determined after the DMS.

Eminentdomain/Compulsory Land Acquisition

The right of the state using its sovereign power to acquire Iand for public purposes. National law establishes which public agencies have the prerogative to exercise eminent domain.

Entitlement Refers to a range of measures, such as compensation in cash or in kind, income restoration support, transfer assistance, livelihood substitution, relocation support, etc., which are provided to the APs depending on the type and severity of their losses to restore their economic and social base.

Entitled party Party that controls or possessed land acquisition objects.

Impact Extent of social and economic impacts resulting from theimplementation of an activity. In land acquisition/ resettlement, the degree of impact will be determined by (a) scope of economic loss and physical displacement/relocation; and (b) vulnerability of the affected population/entitled party. Impact can be positive or negative.

LivelihoodRestoration

This involves re-habilitating the sources of income and livelihoods of severely affected and vulnerable APs to supplement compensation received for acquired assets, in order to achieve, at a minimum, full restoration of living standards and quality of life.

Inventory of Losses

This is the listing of assets as a preliminary record of affected or lost assets during the preparation of the LARP where all fixed assets (i.e., land used for residence, commerce, agriculture; dwelling units; stalls and shops; secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; standing crops and trees with commercial value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood inside the

Subproject boundaries are identified, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement costs calculated. The severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity of impact on the livelihood and productive capacity of the APs are likewise determined.

InvoluntaryResettlement

It is the displacement of people, not of their own volition butinvoluntarily, from their homes, assets, sources of income and livelihood from the site identified for the Project.

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP)

A time-bound action plan with budget, setting out the resettlement objectives and strategies, entitlements, activities and responsibilities, resettlement monitoring, and resettlement evaluation.

Land Acquisition Object

Land, space above ground and below ground, buildings, plants, objects related to land, or any other objects that can be assessed.

Negotiated Land Acquisition

The agency in need of land can carry out land acquisition directly with the respective owners through negotiation based on the result of appraisal by an Appraiser or a Public Appraiser for the sake of efficiency.

Relocation This is the physical displacement of the AP from his/her pre-project place of residence and/or business

Replacement Cost Means the amount in cash or in kind needed to replace an asset in its existing condition, without deduction of transaction costs or depreciation and remaining values of salvageable materials, at prevailing market value, or its nearest equivalent, at the time of compensation payment.

Replacement CostStudy

This refers to the process involved in determining replacement costs of affected assets based on empirical data.

Resettlement Refers to various measures provided to APs in mitigating any and all adverse social impacts of the project, including compensation, relocation (where relevant), and rehabilitation as needed.

Severely Affected Person

This refers to APs who will (i) lose 10% or more of their totalproductive assets, (ii) have to relocate, and/or (iii) lose 10% or more of their total income sources due to the project.

Vulnerable Groups These are distinct groups of people who might suffer more or face the risk of being further marginalized due to the project and specifically include: i) households that are headed by women, ii) household heads with disabilities, iii) households falling under the regional poverty line, iv) elderly household heads, v) land less, vi) people without legal title to land (non-land rights holders), vii) indigenous people or customary communities.2!

This land acquisition and resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2 This definition is in line with Law No. 39/1999 (Article 5 elucidation) on Human Rights. Vulnerable populations include the elderly, children, the poor, pregnant women and people with disabilities.

#!

!!

!

TABLE OF CONTENT

ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... i

DEFENITION OF TERMS........................................................................................ iii

TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................. v

LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................vi

LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................. vii

APPENDIXES .........................................................................................................vii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 1

I. PROJECT AND SUBPROJECT DESCRIPTION..................................................... 4

A. Background....................................................................................................... 4

B. Subproject Description...................................................................................... 4

C. Location of Paneki Raw Water Supply System................................................. 6

D. Action Taken to Minimize Resettlement Impacts .............................................. 6

II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ..................................... 7

A. Methodology ..................................................................................................... 7

B. Scope of Resettlement Impacts ........................................................................ 7

III. SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE ............................................ 12

A. Profile of Sigi District ....................................................................................... 12

B. Summary of Socioeconomic Survey Findings ................................................ 13

IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK........................................................................................... 21

A. National Laws ................................................................................................. 21

B. Asian Development Bank (ADB) Policy .......................................................... 22

C. Gap Analysis ................................................................................................... 24

D. Project Resettlement Principles ...................................................................... 28

V. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION, AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ......... 30

A. Public Consultation and Participation during LARP Preparation .................... 31

B. Consultation at Implementation Stage of Land Acquistion ............................. 37

C. Disclosure ....................................................................................................... 37

VI. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ................................................................ 40

VII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE, AND BENEFIT ................................................. 42

A. Eligibility .......................................................................................................... 42

B. Entitlement Matrix ........................................................................................... 42

C. Valuation of Assets ......................................................................................... 46

VIII. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION .............................................. 48

IX. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN .......................................... 50

A. Legal Basis ..................................................................................................... 50

B. Budget and Financing Plans ........................................................................... 50

#"!

!

!

C. Assumption for Budget Line Items .................................................................. 50

D. The Summary of Cost Estimation ................................................................... 52

X. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................. 53

A. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT ................................................................ 53

B. CAPACITY BUILDING .................................................................................... 53

XI. LARP ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ........................................... 55

XII. MONITORING AND REPORTING......................................................................... 56

A. Monitoring Arrangements................................................................................ 56

B. Internal Monitoring Indicators.......................................................................... 56

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. The Length of Each Subproject Component..................................................... 5

Table 2. Affected Land and Number of AHs ................................................................... 8

Table 3. Affected Fruit Trees .......................................................................................... 9

Table 4. Affected Timber Trees ...................................................................................... 9

Table 5. Summary of Impacts ....................................................................................... 10

Table 6. Profile of Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict ................................................................. 12

Table 7. Age of Respondents and Household Members Group Distribution ................ 13

Table 8. Head of Household and Family Members Based on Gender ......................... 13

Table 9. Marital Status, Ethnicity and Religion of Respondent ..................................... 14

Table 10. Educational Attainment of Respondent......................................................... 14

Table 11. Head of Households Based on Occupations ................................................ 15

Table 12. Average Level of Income of Head of AHs..................................................... 15

Table 13. Households Sanitation Facility...................................................................... 16

Table 14. Household Drinking Water Source................................................................ 16

Table 15. Role of Family Members in Earning a Living ................................................ 16

Table 16. Role of Family Members in Determining Household Needs ......................... 17

Table 17. Role of Family Members in Determining Children’s Education..................... 17

Table 18. Role of Family Members in Community Activities......................................... 17

Table 19. Role of Family Members in Decision Making in General .............................. 18

Table 20. Perceptions of Respondent to the Subproject .............................................. 18

Table 21. Knowledge of Subproject Plans .................................................................... 20

Table 22. Assessment on Involuntary Resettlement Policy Gap .................................. 24

Table 23. Consultations Held during Preparation of LARP........................................... 32

Table 24. Consultation Plan at Implementation Stage of Land Acquisition .................. 38

Table 25. Entitlement Matrix ......................................................................................... 43

Table 26. Assessment Approaches Using Indonesia’s Valuation Standards ............... 46

#""!

!

!

Table 27. Proposed Livelihood Restoration Program ................................................... 48

Table 28. The Market Rate of Trees ............................................................................. 51

Table 29. Cost Estimation for LARP Paneki RWSS ..................................................... 52

Table 30. Land Acquisition Implementation Schedule .................................................. 55

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Paneki Schematic Drinking Water Service System Plan ................................. 5

Figure 2. Location of Paneki RWSS ............................................................................... 6

APPENDIXES

Appendix 1. Subproject Map

Appendix 2. Plot of Land Map

Appendix 3. IOL and SES Questionnaire

Appendix 4. Letter of Market Price Estimation for Land and Plants

Appendix 5. Draft of Project Information Booklet (PIB)

Appendix 6. Cost Estimation for Affected Land

Appendix 7. Cost Estimation for Affected Plants/Trees

Appendix 8. Calculation of Severely Affected Households

Appendix 9. Documentation of Public Consultation Meetings

Appendix 10. Socio-economic Survey Data!

Appendix 11. Semi-annual Monitoring Report Template

$!

!

!

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Project description. To build back better critical infrastructure damaged by the devastating disasters in Central Sulawesi Province in September 2018, Asian Development Bank (ADB) supports the Government of Indonesia (GoI) through the Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (EARR). The Paneki Raw Water Supply System (Paneki RWSS) subproject is considered for inclusion under EARR, together with the Palu, Sigi, Donggala Raw Water Supply System (PASIGALA RWSS) subproject. The subproject is categorized B for Involuntary Resettlement (IR) and has no impact on indigenous people or customary communities following the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS).

2. Scope of Resettlement Impacts. The Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) has been prepared based on the Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS)conducted in 14, 15, 22-23 June 2020 in Loru Village and 27-28 June 2020 in Pombewe Village. Rapid Replacement Cost Study carried out in 2-10 August 2020 and public consultations with affected people, local communities, and local authorities. This LARP has been prepared based on the final engineering design and therefore this LARP will not be updated.

3. The Paneki RWSS subproject will require land acquisition of 27,127.5 m2 in the Loru and Pombewe Villages. The land is to be acquired for the construction of a weir with intake structure, a transmission pipeline and access road. A total of 41 plots of land and 36 types of plants (461 trees) will be affected; 40 plots are owned by 34 affected households (AHs)/1453 affected persons (APs) - five AHs own more than oneplot and one plot belongs to the Central Sulawesi River Basin Organization (S3RBO). The affected trees are owned by 20 AHs (83 APs). No structures will be affected, andnone of the AHs will lose 10% or more of their total productive landholdings. Four AHs(11 APs) are categorized as vulnerable (two elderly men, one elderly woman-headedhouseholds, and one woman-headed household).

4. Socio-economic Profile of AHs. Socioeconomic Survey (SES) on 27 out of 34 AHs was conducted on 14, 15, 22-23 June 2020 in Loru Village and 27-28 June 2020 in Pombewe Village. The reason for the remaining 7 AHs not participating in the SES is due to no info on the address of 7 AHs until the last social impact assessment.

5. Gender Issues. Women have been and will be involved in the consultations. SES was sex-disaggregated. Of the participants in public consultations, 18% were women (59 out of 321 participants). As the women's participation in the public consultations was low, 2 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in Loru and Pombewe Villages on 15-16 July 2020, attended by 100% women (25 women). The FGDs were to obtain the women's voices on the perception on subproject and land acquisition. No suggestions provided by women related to land acquisition due to it is usually handled by men. Gender strategy in has been included in the LARP to ensure participation of women in SES, consultations, livelihood restoration program, and monitoring.

6. Consultation and Disclosure. A total of 7 consultations and two rounds of FGDs with women were carried out on 11 October 2019, 2 & 12 March, 10 & 27 June, 4, 7, 15 & 16 July 2020. The information shared and discussed with the meeting participants included (i) the basic design of the subproject; (ii) the scope of land acquisition and resettlement impacts by the subproject (based on the result of the IOL);

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!3 The total family member of 27 AHs is 115 and estimation family member for 7 AHs that cannot be

interviewed is 30.

%!

!

!

(iii) the principles of land acquisition and resettlement applied for the project (principles, eligibility, proposed entitlements); (iv) the proposed implementation schedule for land acquisition, compensation, assistance and civil works; (v) the proposed Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM); (vi) proposed measures for livelihood restoration for vulnerable households; (vii) mechanism for consultation with and participation of affected people, communities and other stakeholders in LARP preparation, implementation and monitoring. The total number of meeting participants in public consultations is 321. A summary of the LARP in the form of a Project Information Booklet (PIB) or leaflets in Bahasa Indonesia will be distributed to the APs, local governments (villages and subdistricts) and other stakeholders during LARP implementation.

7. Grievance Redress Mechanism. A grievance redress mechanism will beestablished in line with the subproject scope and EARR Resettlement Frameworks toreceive, investigate and respond in a timely manner to any complaints or grievances raised by APs. The GRM includes in the PIB to ensure that the local communities are aware of GRM and their potential involvement and responsibilities in the subproject activities. It is anticipated that all grievances related to benefits and other assistance will be resolved by the S3RBO.

8. Legal Framework. This LARP was prepared in accordance with GoI laws andregulations related to land acquisition as well as the Involuntary Resettlement of Safeguard Policy Statement of ADB (SPS 2009). The main legal framework used as the reference for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement includes: (i) Law No. 2/2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest (ii) Presidential Regulation No. 148 of 2015 on amendment of Presidential Regulation No. 71/2012 provides that land acquisition for public interest with size not more than 5 hectares can be implemented directly by the agency requiring land with the land rights holders, by way of sale or exchange or other means agreed upon by both parties; (iii) ADB SPS 2009, and (iv) resettlement framework prepared in 2019. The objectives of the subproject resettlement policy are to avoid or minimize (if avoidance is not possible) involuntary resettlement impacts, mitigate and compensate adverse impacts, restore livelihoods, and improve the living standards of the vulnerable households.

9. Entitlements and Compensation. Compensation for the affected land and trees will follow the replacement cost principle. The entitlement matrix covers the compensation and types of assistance to be provided to the affected persons (APs) and appropriate assistances for vulnerable groups. The APs will be allowed to harvest their trees before the land acquisition for the subproject is implemented. The cut-off date for the subproject will be set later when the Land Acquisition Team (LAT) of S3RBO conducts verification to the DMS.

10. Livelihood Restoration Programs. Livelihood restoration programs will be provided to vulnerable households to ensure their living standard will not be worse off due to the subproject. The DMS and SES found that there are four vulnerable households and none severely APs. No severely AHs will be provided with LRP as no severely AHs because of the project. The proposed programs are will be implemented by the Agriculture Agency, Social Agency, and Health Agency of Sigi District.

11. Resettlement Budget and Financing Plan. A budget of IDR 1,769,587,400 or USD 120,050.16 has been estimated for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement. The budget includes: (i) costs for compensation (land and trees), (ii) livelihood restoration programs, (iii) operational cost, (iv) litigation fee at the court, and (v) contingency. The executing agency (EA), i.e. the Ministry of Public Works and Housing

&!

!

!

(MPWH), will ensure timely funds disbursement and will prepare all the necessary plans.

12. Institutional Arrangements. MPWH will be the EA for this subproject. MPWH has established a Central Project Management Unit (CPMU) to consolidate activities and reporting from the Project Implementation Unit (PIU), i.e. the S3RBO. The S3RBO will be responsible for the preparation of relevant social safeguard documents as well as their implementation and monitoring. The S3RBO will be supported by the Project Management and Supervision Consultant (PMSC).

13. Implementation Schedule. Land acquisition activities has been starting since in November 2020 and expected to be completed by the March 2021. A Land Acquisition Team (LAT) will be established during November 2020. Land compensation negotiations are expected to be conducted during February 2021 and compensation payments expected to be delivered by March 2021. The implementation of livelihood restoration activities will be started in May 2021.

14. Monitoring and Reporting. Internal monitoring will be undertaken by the CPMU assisted by the Social Safeguards Specialist included in the team of the Project Management Consultant (PMC) throughout the land acquisition and resettlement process. Semi-annual monitoring reports will be prepared during subproject implementation by the CPMU with assistance of the PMC to report on the progress of all activities under the LARP, including the implementation of livelihood restoration programs. In addition, general progress activities of social safeguards should be included in the quarterly project progress report. The external monitoring is not required as the subproject was categorized as B for involuntary resettlement

'!

!

!

I. PROJECT AND SUBPROJECT DESCRIPTION

A. Background

1. Overview. The Government of Indonesia (GoI) through the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH) has requested Asian Development Bank (ADB) to finance Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (EARR). The emergency assistance loans (EAL) supports the GoI to build back better critical infrastructure damaged by the devastating disasters in Central Sulawesi Province in September 2018. The EARR will support rehabilitation and reconstruction of education facilities, water supply, water resources, ports and airports. All infrastructure will be built to higher standards of disaster resilience to help finance rehabilitation works benefiting disaster affected area to recover from the damage caused by the earthquake and tsunami. To comply with ADB social safeguard requirements, the Resettlement and Customary Communities Development Framework (RCCDF) was prepared in May 2019. The RCCDF guides the assessment process to screen subproject interventions, sets up institutional arrangements in relation to social safeguards management and monitoring, and defines social assessment requirements in accordance with the existing procedures to comply with the applicable laws and regulations of the Government and with ADB Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009 (SPS 2009).

2. To achieve its expected outcome, the EARR will include 4 outputs in 2 components. Targets and indicators are described in detail in the Design and Monitoring Framework. Subprojects under each output of the EARR will be subject to a selection criterion since the EAL will apply a sector lending approach in selecting investments. This subproject is under Component 1 (Output 2).

3. Component 1: Public Works Infrastructure comprising:

i. Output 1: Human settlements infrastructure constructed, rehabilitated and

upgraded. The output will construct, rehabilitate and/or upgrade (i) education facilities, and (ii) water supply (treatment and distribution facilities). The facilities will be built back better to higher standards of disaster resilience, which will ensure risks from future hazards are reduced through structural design features. At the same time, non-structural measures such as disaster preparedness plans will also be implemented. The output will ensure that sustainability plans are in place and capacity of agencies strengthened to better manage water supply services.

ii. Output 2: Water resources infrastructure constructed, rehabilitated and upgraded. The output will (i) reconstruct the Gumbasa irrigation system; (ii) reconstruct and upgrade the Palu, Sigi, Donggala (PASIGALA) raw water supply system; and (iii) construct coastal protection works to prevent coastal erosion and tidal flooding. Where possible, nature-based solutions will be promoted. The river basin organization will be strengthened to better design resilient infrastructure, improve Operations & Maintenance (O&M) of assets, and stay equipped with hydrometeorological instruments for managing water flows across the river basin.

B. Subproject Description

4. This subproject (Paneki Raw Water Supply System/Paneki RWSS) is a part of PASIGALA RWSS in EARR. The subproject components include weir with intake structure, transmission pipeline and access road for material distribution. The subproject requires 4.395 km transmission pipe with diameter is 250 mm. The length of each subproject component can be seen in Table 1 below.

(!

Table 1. The Length of Each Subproject Component

No Subproject Component

Size Total Affected Area (m

2)

Land status Remark

1 Weir with intake structure

16 m 2,4004

Landacquisition is required.

2 Transmission pipeline to WTPa. belong toAHsb. belong togovernmentland (S3RBO)

4.395 km a.24,127.55

b.600

Landacquisition is required.

3 Access road for material distribution

1.6 km Landacquisition is required.

After construction is completed, the road will be functioning for maintenance access road.

Source: DMS on 28 June 2020.

Figure 1. Paneki Schematic Drinking Water Service System Plan

5. Based on the figure above, Paneki RWSS priority connection is in permanentdwellings (Hunian Tetap /Huntap) Pombewe), Loru and Pombewe Village in SigiBiromaru Subdistrict. According to the Directorate General of Human Settlements(DGHS) standards, Paneki WTP6 25 liters/second can provide water up to 2,500 HHs.

4 Belong to 1 AH.

5Total affected area for transmission pipeline and access road for material distribution.

6 Development of WTP for Paneki RWSS in “Huntap” Pombewe is underway by Central Sulawesi Human Settlements Agency (funded by World Bank). The land is owned by Sigi District Government in May 2020.

)!

!

!

C. Location of Paneki Raw Water Supply System

6. The subproject will pass through 2 villages (Loru and Pombewe) in Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict, Sigi District. The location of the intake and transmission pipe (and access road for material distribution as well) is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Location of Paneki RWSS

!

!

Note: access road for material distribution route are in parralel with the transmission pipeline!

D. Action Taken to Minimize Resettlement Impacts

7. The objectives of the project resettlement policy are to avoid or minimize (if avoidance is not possible) involuntary resettlement impacts, mitigate and compensate adverse impacts, restore livelihoods, and improve the living standards of the vulnerable households. Below are the actions taken by the subproject to minimize resettlement impact:

- Installation of the pipes in residential area is avoided. Most of the pipes will be installed on AH's land along the river and the road. Thus, it will minimize access restriction to the farm area.

- Pipes that pass-through AH's farm area will be constructed above the ground. However, the pipes will appear only 25 cm above the ground and it will also minimize the access restriction to the farm area

- Some of the pipeline is designed to be placed on the S3RBO land (in the river bank), with still considering the technical aspects.

- The pipeline will be installed along the government road and therefore, impacts to the community assets can be minimized .

-

*!

!

!

II. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

8. This LARP is prepared based on the final engineering design and therefore noupdate of LARP will be required. However, DMS data may change based on a verification of the DMS carried out by the S3RBO LAT during LARP implementation.The changes of this data will be reported either in the LARP implementation report or semi-annual social safeguards monitoring report.

A. Methodology

9. In collecting primary and secondary data, the activities for LARP of Paneki RWSS for potentially affected households were carried out on 11 October 2019, 2 & 12 March, 10 & 28 June and the consultations during 4, 7, 15 & 16 July 2020, applying a combination study of qualitative and quantitative methods. Consultation invited the land owners with involvement of the head of village and the head of neighbourhood (RT), was conducted prior to the DMS and SES, hold on 10 June 2020 in order toexplain purpose of tthe survey and set the schedule.

10. Quantitative Method. The DMS was carried out on all 34 AHs. At the time of DMS, 27 out of 34 AHs were available to participate in the DMS cencus while the 7 remaining AHs were not as their addresses were not identified. Information of losses for those 7 AHs was provided by village government and the head of neighbourhood(RT). A total of 41 parcels of land will be affected. 40 parcels of land belong to 34 AHs(5 AHs own more than a parcel of land7 ) and 1 parcel of land belongs to the government. The DMS was conducted from 14-28 June 2020 (14, 15, 22-23 June 2020 in Loru Village and 27-28 June 2020 in Pombewe Village). Questionnaire was attached in the Appendix 3.

11. Qualitative Method. Qualitative analysis was done through in-depth interviewand Focus Group Discussions (FGDs).

a) In-depth Interviews. The interview was conducted in June 2020 to village official and community leader to receive information on 7 AHs8 whose address are unknown.

b) Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). FGDs with women were held on 15-16July 2020 to get women’s perception to the subproject and land acquisition andvalidate some information related assets (land and trees) ownership collectedduring DMS. The number of participants in Loru Village is 13 women (5 member of AHs and 8 representatives of the villagers) and 12 women (5 member of AHs and 7 villagers’ representatives) attended the FGD in Pombewe Village.

B. Scope of Resettlement Impacts

12. The Paneki raw water supply scheme will provide raw water supply to its service area comprising the Pombewe Huntap and the Pombewe and Loru villages,Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict. The availability of clean water is expected to have positive impact through improvement of sanitation and health conditions for the communities in the service area. However, this subproject may also have some adverse social impacts to the community, such as loss of their land and non land assets (trees). The land acquisition for the subproject causes no impacts on structures (houses, shops, secondary structures, etc.), public assets, and business of AHs.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!7

1 AH owns asset (plants/trees) in 3 locations and 4 AHs own assets in 2 locations each.8

Bpk. Sudin, Bpk. Jahir, Ibu Simina, Bpk. Jakir, Bpk. Basri, Bpk. Usman, Bpk. Riswan.

+!

!

!

13. Affected land. The subproject will require a land of 27,127.5 m2 (consist of 41parcels of land) located in Loru and Pombewe Village, Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict of Sigi Regency. The required lands are owned by 34 AHs (40 parcels of land that have been used for farming for home-consumption and these are not the main source of income and 1 plot of land in the form of river bank belongs to the government). The affected area is 0.3% – 8% of total landholding of the household. The detail can be seen in Appendix 8. The remaining land of the AHs is economically viable after land acquisition. The subproject requires land for developing of weir with intake structure,transmission of pipeline and the access road for material distribution. The land to be acquired for weir intake is owned by an AH in Loru. The affected area will be 2,400 m2.24,727.50 m2 land needs to be acquired for transmission pipeline to WTP and access road for material distribution. 24,127.50 m2 land (39 plots) of 24,727.50 m2 is owned by 33 AHs and 600 m2 of them belongs to local government. The land ownerships are in the form of Surat Keterangan Pendaftaran Tanah (SKPT) or land registration certificates, akta jual beli (sale & purchase agreement), and land & building tax (Pajak

Bumi dan Bangunan/PBB) payment. The summary can be seen in the Table 2.

Table 2. Affected Land and Number of AHs

No Subproject

Component

Village Total

AffectedArea (m

2)

Total

Parcel of Affected

Land

Number of Proof of Land

Ownership9

AHs APs*

Gov**

SKPT10

Akta Jual Beli

11

PBB12

1 Weir with intake structure

Loru 2,400 1 1 5 - - - 1

2 Transmission pipe to WTPa. belong to

AHsb. belong to

government (S3RBO)

a. Loru andPombewe

b. Pombewe

a.24,127.50b. 600

a. 39b. 1

a. 33b. -

140 1 1113

314

2515

3 a. Access road for material distribution

Loru andPombewe

Total 27,127.5 41 34 145 1 40

Source: IOL survey on 28 June 2020.

Note:

*family members of 27 AHs that were interviewed during IOL and 7 AHs that use estimation based on the average household size of the other AHs obtained by the SES and IOL (4.3 per household). The detail can be seen in Appendix 10. **Land owned by S3RBO (pipe installed along the river bank)

14. Affected Trees. Land acquisition will result in the loss of 36 type of plants16

(461 trees) with different category as shown in the Table 3 below. The fruit trees are categorized as young, about to bear fruit and fruit bearing. The timber trees are based

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!9

The detail can be seen in Appendix 10.10

SKPT is a type of land certificate issued officially by the National Land Agency (BPN) to explain the status of land history designated for research based on physical and juridical data.

11Akta jual beli is authentic evidence of the transfer of rights of land and buildings.

12PBB stands for Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan-evidence for payment Land and Building Tax

13APs is 45.

14APs is 9.

15APs is 86.

16 Beside trees, there are also semak belukar (shrubs) that grow on 20 AHs’ land.

,!

!

!

on the diameter of the trees (small: 1-50 cm, medium: 50-100 cm, and big: 120 cm above). The affected trees are owned by 20 AHs17 (83 APs). The fruit and timber from affected trees are for home-consumption only.

Table 3. Affected Fruit Trees

No Name of Affected Tree

Category AHs APs

Young About to bear

Bearing fruits

Total

1 Coklat (Chocolate) 19 - 109 128 9 42

2 Kemiri (Candlenut) 5 20 1 26 7 32

3 Kopi (Coffee) 1 - 5 6 3 10

4 Belimbing (Starfruit) - - 4 4 1 5

5 Kelapa (Coconut) 5 - 25 30 9 34

6 Asam - - 1 1 1 5

7 Mangga (Mango) 4 - 16 20 6 23

8 Langsat - - 1 1 1 5

9 Sukun 1 - 1 2 2 7

10 Srikaya 2 1 - 3 1 5

11 Nangka (Jackfruit) 1 - 1 2 1 3

12 Cashew (jambu monyet)

1 - - 1 1 3

13 Durian 1 - 3 4 1 6

14 Rambutan - - 1 1 1 5

15 Sahang - - 1 1 1 5

16 Enau/Aren - - 4 4 4 14

17 Sirsak (soursup) 2 - 2 4 2 3

18 Jeruk purut (Lime) 3 - 2 5 2 6

Total 45 21 177 243 53 213

-./0123!456!7/0#28!.9!%+!:/92!%;%;<!

Table 4. Affected Timber Trees


Category AHs APs

Small Medium Big Total

1 Kelor (Moringa)

5 - 2 7 2 7

2 Gersen - 4 - 4 1 3

3 Waru 5 - 6 11 3 8

4 Lamtoro 4 - 1 5 1 5

5 Bendo - 1 - 1 1 5

6 Aga 9 13 - 22 4 14

7 Bau 3 3 - 6 1 5

8 Awar-Awar 3 1 2 6 2 3

9 Bamboo clumps

6 - 5 11 5 15

10 Sule 2 1 - 3 2 7

11 Sompo 1 - - 1 1 2

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!17

This number is without double counting.

$;!

!

!


Category AHs APs

Small Medium Big Total

12 Palem (Palm) 1 1 - 2 2 5

13 Mbosi 1 - - 1 1 5

14 Ngaru - 1 - 1 1 5

15 Pohon Jawa 2 - - 2 1 8

16 Jati (Teak) 14 24 2 40 8 40

17 Kayu Balario 5 7 - 12 4 18

18 Lekatu 8 - - 8 1 6

Total 69 56 18 143 41 161


15. Temporary or permanen impact during construction. Any temporary or permanent impact on land or non-land assets owned by households and local communities, etc. caused by the contractor during construction is the responsibility of the contractor. If cash payment is needed, because the contractor causes the impact that is beyond what was already compensated within the corridor of impact (COI), then it should be at full replacement cost, and as per the entitlement matrix in the report.

16. Vulnerable Households. SES shows that no household heads with disabilitiesand none of them is considered poor (based on Sigi Regency in Figures for 2019, Sigi’s poverty line is IDR 316,949 (USD 21.5) per capita/month). The remote customary map issued by Ministry of Social Affair in 2009 indicates that the remote customary communities live in the districts of Banggai Kepulauan, Banggai, Donggala, Morowali, Parigi Moutong, Poso, Tojo Una-Una,and Toli-Toli. In this subproject, no AHs are considered as Indigenous People (IP). Overlayed of the subproject component with the IP maps issued by BRWA – the Indigenous Territories Registration Body carried out by ADB support team also confirmed that subproject does not affect IP communities.

17. There are 4 vulnerable households (1 elderly man, 1 elderly woman, 1 elderly woman headed household, and 1 woman headed household). Total APs is 11. No AHs are landless households. The details of vulnerable households can be seen in Appendix 10.

18. Severely AHs. Based on the calculation for severity of AHs in Appendix 8,there is no AH who will lose more than 10% of their total productive land due to the subproject. The percentages of land loss of the AHs are 0.3% - 8%.

19. The Table 5 below shows summary of impacts for this subproject.

Table 5. Summary of Impacts

Items Unit Quantity

Number of AHs HH 34Number of APs Person 145Affected Institutional Institution

(S3RBO)1

Total Affected Land

ÿ Private affected Land(No of parcel)

ÿ S3RBO land(No of parcel)

m2

parcelm

2

parcel

ÿ 27,127.50 (40)

ÿ 600(1)

Timber Trees Tree 243AHs 15

$$!

!

!

Items Unit Quantity

APs 57Fruit Tress Tree 143

HH 15APs 61

Vulnerable Household AHs/APs 4/11

ÿ Poor (based on Sigi Regency’s poverty line) AHs/APs -

ÿ Elderly-headed AHs/APs 2/8

ÿ Women elderly headed household AH/AP 1/1

ÿ Women headed household AHs/APs 1/2

ÿ Land less AHs/APs -

ÿ IPs AHs/APs -

Severely AHs AHs/APs -

$%!

!

!

III. SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION AND PROFILE

20. This section presents a summary of the socio-economic information about the area and people who will be potentially affected by the land acquisition process. General demographic data is presented for the Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict. More detailed information was gathered from a socio-economic survey (SES) of the affected households.

A. Profile of Sigi District

21. Sigi Regency was formerly a part of Donggala. Then, through Act Undang-Undang No. 27 Year 2008 dated July 21, 2008, Sigi was expanded into an autonomous district. In 2018 the number of residents in Sigi was fourth with the amount reaching 237,011 inhabitants. Sigi Regency consists of 15 subdistricts. In 2018, the largest percentage of the population in Sigi Regency is still in Sigi Biromaru subdistrict with a percentage of 19.93 percent. The three of main source of livelihood for Sigi District communiy are agriculture, trade and marine fish. Paddyrice and corn are the main agirculture products

22. According to BPS-Statistics Indonesia, Village Potential Data Collecting In 2018, Sigi Regency has one hospital, at Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict. Aside from that, there also were 6 polyclinics, 20 public health centers, 44 subsidiary of public health centers and 14 pharmacies. The number of customers served by Perusahaan Daerah

Air Minum (PDAM)/state-owned water utility company in 2018 is 3,082 customers, which are spread in only a few districts, namely in South Dolo, Sigi Biromaru, Marawola and Kinovaro. In 2018, data obtained from the Sigi Regency Pariwisata Office showed an increase in the number of restaurants, in 2017 there were 58 restaurants, while in 2018 there were 72 restaurants; most of which are located in Sigi Biromaru subdistrict. In 2018, there are 75 cooperatives in Sigi Regency, which are spread evenly in all sub-districts, except in Pipikoro and Marawola Barat Districts. There are 30 cooperatives in Sigi Biromaru sub-district and 11 in Dolo Subdistrict. In Sigi Regency, the poverty line is at IDR 316,949 (USD 21.5) in 2018. The percentage of poor people in 2017 is 12.60 % of the population of Sigi Regency"

23. Paneki RWSS is located in Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict. Total area of Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict is 289.50 km2. Population of the subdistrict in 2018 is 47,230 and the average household size is 4. Farming is the main livelihood for people in Sigibiromaru Subdisrict, but since many irrigation systems were broken due to the earthquake in 2018, most of them change the cropping pattern from paddy rice to corn and or chili. Number of poor people in 2018 is 3,273. The table below provides a profileof Sigi Biromaru Subdisrict18.

Table 6. Profile of Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict

Capital of Subdistrict Mpanau

Total area (km2) 289.60

Number of villages in 2018 18

Population (thousand) in 2018 47.23

Population density per km2in 2018 163

Household 11,705

Average household size 4

Annual population growth rate (%) 1.22

Religion Islam 40,687;

Protestan 4,571;

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!18

based on Sigi Regency in Figures 2019

$&!

!

!

Catholic 1,627;

Hindu 100,

Budha 65

Natural disaster in 2018 Flood 4, earthquake 10

Number of poor people in 2018 3,273

B. Summary of Socioeconomic Survey Findings

24. SES19 was carried out to 79% AHs (27 of 34 AHs), because the address of 7 AHs could not be found until the last social impact assessment. The respondents for the SES are consist of 17 (63%) male AHs households head and 10 (37%) are women which constitute of two women headed household and AH’s housewife. The total family member of surveyed AHs is 115 people, consisting of 48% men (55) and 52% women (60). The average household size is 4.3.

25. Age Group. The total number of respondent’s family member is 115. 15% respondents are in 31-40 age group, 30% are in 41-51 age group, 44% are in 55-65age group, and 11% are categorized as elderly (over 65 years old). 3 elderly respondents are in Loru (1 respondent/6APs) and Pombewe (2 respondents/3APs). The distribution of the age groups is shown in the table below.

Table 7. Age of Respondents and Household Members Group Distribution

No Village Respondents Age (Year) (APs)

Male Female APs <20 20-30 31-40 41-51 51-55 55-65 65>

1 Loru 5 - 25 - - 1 (5) 2 (11) - 1 (3) 1 (6)

2 Pombewe 12 10 90 - - 3 (14) 6 (23) - 11 (50) 2 (3)

Total 17 10 115 - - 4 (19) 8 (34) - 12 (53) 3 (9)

% 63 37 100 - - 15 (17) 30 (30) - 44 (46) 11 (8)


Table 8. Head of Household and Family Members Based on Gender

No Subdistrict VillageHousehold Head No. of family members

Male Female Male Female

1 Sigi Biromaru Loru 5 - 14 11

2 Sigi Biromaru Pombewe 20 2 53 37

Total 25 2 67 48

% 93 7 58 42


!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!19

SES data is also shown in Appendix 10

!"#

#

# #26

.M

ari

tal

Sta

tus

, E

thn

icit

y &

Re

lig

ion

.B

ase

d o

n m

ari

tal sta

tus

of

resp

on

de

nt,

89

% A

Hs (

24

) a

re m

arr

ied

, 7

%A

Hs

(2)

are

fe

ma

le

he

ad

ed

ho

use

ho

lds/w

ido

ws a

nd

4%

AH

s (

1)

are

aw

ido

we

r. O

f 2

7 A

Hs,

44

% A

Hs b

elo

ng

to

Ka

ili t

rib

e,

37

% A

Hs a

re B

ug

is,

7%

Ja

va

ne

se

an

d 7

% M

an

da

r. A

ll o

f th

em

are

Mo

sle

m.

Ta

ble

9.

Ma

rita

l S

tatu

s,

Eth

nic

ity

an

dR

eli

gio

no

f R

es

po

nd

en

t

No

Vil

lag

eE

thn

icit

yR

eli

gio

nM

ari

tal

Sta

tus

Ka

ili

Bu

gis

Ja

va

ne

se

Ma

nd

ar

Ba

nja

rM

os

lem

Ch

ris

tia

nC

ath

oli

cS

ing

leM

arr

ied

Wid

ow

Wid

ow

er

1

Lo

ru

3

1

1

- -

5

- -

- 5

-

-

2

Po

mb

ew

e9

9

-

2

1

22

- -

- 1

92

1

To

tal

12

10

2

2

1

27

- -

- 2

42

1

%

44

37

7

7

4

10

0-

- -

89

7

4

No

te:

Th

e t

wo

wo

me

nh

ea

de

d h

ou

se

old

sin

Po

mb

ew

e V

illa

ge

are

Ka

ili a

nd

Bu

gis

eth

nic

an

d m

osle

m.

So

urc

e:

SE

So

n 2

8 J

un

e 2

02

0. #

27

.E

du

ca

tio

na

l A

tta

inm

en

t o

f R

es

po

nd

en

t.T

he

h

igh

est

ed

uca

tio

n

leve

l o

f re

sp

on

de

nt

is

a

do

cto

ral

de

gre

e

(3.7

%).

7

.41

%

co

mp

lete

d m

aste

r d

eg

ree

, h

ow

eve

r th

e s

am

e p

erc

en

tag

e o

f re

sp

on

de

nt

did

no

t co

mp

lete

th

e p

rim

ary

sch

oo

l.

Ta

ble

10

.E

du

ca

tio

na

l A

tta

inm

en

t o

f R

es

po

nd

en

t

No

Vil

lag

eN

ot

att

en

de

d

sc

ho

ol

No

t c

om

ple

ted

E

lem

en

tary

Sc

ho

ol

Ele

me

nta

ry

Sc

ho

ol

Ju

nio

r H

igh

S

ch

oo

lS

en

ior

Hig

h

Sc

ho

ol

Ba

ch

elo

r D

eg

ree

Ma

ste

r D

eg

ree

Do

cto

ral

De

gre

e

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

M

F

1

Lo

ru-

- -

- 2

-

2

- 1

-

- -

- -

- -

2

Po

mb

ew

e-

- 1

1

4

6

1

2

3

-

1

- 2

-

- 1

To

tal

- -

1

1

6

6

3

2

4

- 1

-

2

- -

1

%

- -

4

4

22

22

11

7

15

- 4

-

7

- -

4

No

te:

Tw

o w

om

en

he

ad

ed

ho

use

ho

lds h

ave

ele

me

nta

ry s

ch

oo

l a

tta

intm

en

t.

So

urc

e:

SE

So

n 2

8 J

un

e 2

02

0.

#

!"#

#

#

28. Occupation. The main work of the AHs is a farmer (70.4%). It is followed by day laborer (11.1%), civil servant (7.4%), and private employee, entrepreneur and lecturer (3.7% each).

Table 11. Head of Households Based on Occupations

NoSub-

districtVillage

Type of work

Civil Servant (PNS)

Private Employee

Day Laborer

Entrepreneur Farmer Lecturer

1 Sigi Biromaru

Loru - - 1 - 4 -

2 Sigi Biromaru

Pombewe 2 1 2 1 15 1

Total 2 1 3 1 19 1

% 7.4 3.7 11.1 3.7 70.4 3.7

Note: The women headed households are farmers. Source: SES on 28 June 2020.

#

29. Average Monthly Income. The highest income per month among 27 surveyedAHs is IDR 10,000,000 and the lowest income is IDR 2,500,000. Table 12 shows the average income per surveyed AHs. None of AHs is categorized as poor HH based on the poverty line, etc. Poverty line per household (the average household size is 4.3) based on poverty threshold of Sigi Regency is Rp. 1,362,881 or USD 92.45. The average monthly household income of the surveyed households is Rp. 2,870,515 or USD 194.73/household/month. No difference between incomes of female-headedhouseholds and male-headed households. The main income source of the surveyed households is farmer as can be seen in Appendix 10. The table below shows average level of income of surveyed AHs.

Table 12. Average Level of Income of Head of AHs

No Subdistrict Village Income (million) No. of

AHs

No. of

APs1,5-2,5

2-2,5

2,5-3,5

3,5-4,5

4,5-5,5

>5,5

1 Sigi Biromaru Loru - 5 - - - - 5 25

2 Sigi Biromaru Pombewe - 20 - - 1 1 22 90

Total - 25 - - 1 1 27 115

% - 92 - - 4 4 100 100

Note: The women headed households have average monthly income IDR 2.500.000Source: SES on 28 June 2020.

30. Health and Sanitation. All AHs have septic tank in their house. The source of

drinking water is from public hydrants (17%) and communal tap built as a part of

community-based water supply and sanitation program (PAMSIMAS) (24%). Based on

the results of SES, the most common diseases experienced by affected people are

fever, gout, cholesterol, high blood pressure, and diabetes. AHs can get access to

healthcare, in the nearest village (Mpanau Village).

!$#

#

#

Table 13. Households Sanitation Facility

No Subdistrict Village

Toilets

Toilets to

Septic tank

Toilets flowed to the river

Public toilets with

Septic tank

Public toilets

without Septic tank

River Others

1 Sigi Biromaru Loru 5 - - - - -

2 Sigi Biromaru Pombewe 22 - - - - -

Total 27 - - - - -

% 100 - - - - -

Source: SES on 28 June 2020.

Table 14. Household Drinking Water Source

No Subdistrict Village

Drinking Water Source

PDAM Public Hydrants

Refill water

Water Around

The Shallow

Well

River Communal Tap

20

1 Sigi Biromaru Loru - 2 - - - - 3

2 Sigi Biromaru Pombewe - 3 - - - - 21

Total - 5 - - - - 24

% - 17 - - - - 83


31. Assets ownership and access to public facilities. Beside land and trees, all AHs own motorcycles and 2 AHs own both motorcycles and cars. Education center is accessible because there are primary, junior and senior high school in Loru and Pombewe Village. The university and the bank are in the city. AHs can go to the market located in the nearest village (Mpanau Village).

32. Gender Issues. Women have been and will be involved in the consultations. SES was sex-disaggregated. 24% women (84 out of 346 participants) were participated during public consultations and FGDs. FGDs held on 15-16 July 2020 in Loru and Pombewe Village were attended by 100% women (25 women). FGDs were held to get more women's voices on the perception on the subproject and land acquisition, validate some information collected during IOL and determine the role of family members in the decision-making process in the family. Types of activities are earning a living, determining household needs, children's education, meetings with the community members, and decision-making in general.

33. In earning a living, 66.66% AHs (18 of 27 households) gave the role of earning a living to husband and only 7.40% AHs (2) made the wives to earn a living. The details can be seen in Table 15 below.

Table 15. Role of Family Members in Earning a Living

No Roles Total Percentage (%)

1 Husband 18 66.66

#############################################################20

A part of PAMSIMAS program

!%#

#

#


2 Wife 2 7.40

3 Husband and Wife 4 14.81

4 Husband, Wife, and son 3 11.11

5 Husband and daughter 0 0.00

Total 27 100

# # ####Source: women FGDs on 15-16 July 2020.

34. In determining household needs, 33.33% AHs (9) handed over their roles to their husbands; 29.62% AHs (8) handed over the role to the wife; 3.70 % AHs (1) handed over the role to daughter; and 33.33% AHs (9) managed together by husband and wife.

Table 16. Role of Family Members in Determining Household Needs


1 Husband 9 33.33

2 Wife 8 29.62

3 Daughter 1 3.70


Total 27 100

Source: women FGDs on 15-16 July 2020.

35. In determining children's education, 33.33% AHs (9) handed over the role to their husbands; 25.92% AHs (7) handed over the role to the wife; 33.33% AHs (9) gave the role to husband and wife; and 7.40 AHs (2) let the children decide.

Table 17. Role of Family Members in Determining Children’s Education


1 Husband 9 33.33

2 Wife 7 25.92

3 Daughter 0 0.00

4 Husband dan Wife 9 33.33

5 Children 2 7.40

Total 27 100


36. In attending meetings as a member of the community (including attending consultations on the land acquisition), 33.33 % AHs (9) handed over the role to their husbands, 11.11% AHs (3) handed over the role to the wife, 33.33% AHs (9) shared the role between husband and wife, 14.81% AHs (4) gave the role to all family members who have free time, and 7.4% AHs (2) have never participated in any activities in the community.

Table 18. Role of Family Members in Community Activities


!&#

#

#


1 Husband 9 33.33

2 Wife 3 11.11


4 All family members 4 14.81

5 None 2 7.40

Total 27 100


37. For the decision-making activities in general (including a decision on the land acquisition), 32.14% AHs (9) handed over the role to their husbands, 17.86% AHs (5)handed over the role to the wife, 21.43% AHs (6) shared the role between husband and wife, and 28.57% AHs (7) made decisions after discussion with all family members.

Table 19. Role of Family Members in Decision Making in General


1 Husband 9 32.14

2 Wife 5 17.86


4 All Family Members 7 28.57

Total 27 100


38. AHs’ Perception on the Proposed Subproject. 27 AHs have no objection to the subproject plan. The AHs agreed with several reasons as shown in the table below. 30% of them agreed because the subproject is considered to improve the community economy. 22% AHs agreed as long as they receive compensation accordingly.

Table 20. Perceptions of Respondent to the Subproject

No Perceptions of the Subproject Plan Total AHs Percentage (%)

F M Total

1 Agree, as long as they receive compensation accordingly 6 4 10 32 2 Agree, do not want to hinder the government program/for

the public interest1 4 5 16

3 Agree, for the safety of the surrounding community 0 0 0 0 4 Agree, as long as the development activities are carried

out well0 2 2 6

5 Agree, increase and improve the community economy 2 6 8 266 Agree, as long as there is an access to the farmer’s

business1 2 3 10

7 Agree, can work for the subproject 0 3 3 10 8 Disagree, the route should not pass through the

respondent's land0 0 0 0

Total 10 21 31 100Source: SES on 28 June 2020.

39. As can be seen in the Table 21, all AHs already know about the subproject plan. 52% received information from local government (head of village), 41% are from subproject party (S3RBO), and 7% are from surrounding people.

!'#

#

#

()#

#

#

Table 21. Knowledge of Subproject Plans

No Knowledge

on Project

Plan

Source of Information Total

Local

Government

Project Party Media (TV,

radio,

newspaper)

People

around the

house

F M Total F M Total Total F M Total

1 Already know 5 9 14 4 7 11 0 0 2 2 27

2 Do not know 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage (%) 19 33 52 15 26 41 0 0 7 7 100


(!#

#

#

IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK

A. National Laws

40. The main legal framework for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement is Law No. 2 of 2012 regarding land acquisition for development in the public interest21

and it’s implementing regulations including Presidential Regulation (Perpres) Number 71/2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Public Interest and Perpres No. 148/2015 on the Fourth Amendment to the Perpres No. 71 of 2012.

41. Law Number 2 of 2012 provides a clear procedure and time frame which will accelerate the process of land acquisition. The Government should undertake land acquisition by involving all entitled holders (pihak yang berhak) and concerned entities. The entitled parties shall be those who control or own the object of the land acquisition, inter alia: (a) the holders of land rights; (b) the holders of land rights to manage; (c) nadzir for the waqf

22 land; (d) the owners of former customary rights secured land; (e) customary communities; (f) the parties occupying the state land in good faith; (g) land tenure holders; and/or (h) the owners of buildings, plants or other objects related to theland. The object of land acquisition includes; (i) land; (ii) above ground and underground space; (iii) plants; (iii) buildings; (iv) objects related to land; and (v) other appraisable loss that include non-physical losses such as loss of business, loss of job, cost of change of location, cost of change of profession, and loss of the remaining property (residual property that is no longer viable). Land acquisition should be conducted by providing fair and adequate compensation to the entitled parties. The law recognizes that: (i) persons controlling and utilizing land are entitled to compensation; (ii) all losses - lost land and non-land assets, other structures that can be valued - should be evaluated by an independent appraiser; (iii) subproject location permit will be required that should refer to spatial planning; and (iv) land acquisition will be undertaken by National Land Agency (BPN).

42. Presidential Regulation No. 148 of 2015 provides that land acquisition in the public interest concerning not more than 5 ha of land (i) can be acquired directly by the agency requiring land with the land rights holders by way of sale or exchange or other means agreed upon by both parties (Article 121, Clause 2.), (ii) does not need to get location determination but should be consistent with the spatial development plan (Tata Ruang/RTRW) for the area (Article 121, Clause 2.), and (iii) valuation of the land is carried out by independent appraisal. Article 121 A of the Presidential Regulation No. 148 of 2015 states that “land acquisition for development in the public interest which is undertaken by a private entity can be done through sale transaction, exchange, or other agreed mechanism between the entitled party with the private entity.

43. Spatial planning conformity. Water resources infrastructure system is included in Sigi Regency Spatial Planning. Article 12 of Sigi District Regulation No. 21/2011 regarding spatial planning for 2010-2030 stated that water resources system as referred in Article 9 letter b consists of: a. river area (national, provincial, and district river basin), b. irrigation area (Gumbasa, Kekeloe, Maenusi, Wuno, Ngata Baru, Paneki, Gimpu, Tongoa, Pakuli, Bangga, Saluri, Baluase, Rogo, Sambo, Wera, and

#############################################################21

Public interest means the interest of the people, State, and society that must be realized by the government for the prosperity of the people. Article 10 of the law states that development of power generators, transmission lines, sub-stations, networks, and electricity distribution are categorized as public interest.

22Waqf - an inalienable religious endowment in Islamic law, typically donating a building or plot of land or even cash for Muslim religious or charitable purposes. The donated assets are held by a charitable trust or waqf organizer.

((#

#

#

Bomba), and c. raw water infrastructure for clean water (Gumbasa river, Danau Lindu lake, and Lariang river).

44. Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 2014) on the Assessment of Land

Acquisition for Development for the Public Interest. The Indonesia Professional Appraisers Society (MAPPI) formulated the standards by adopting the development of international standards (IVS 2011). Standards 204 provides guidelines for assessment of land acquisition object for compensation in land acquisition for development in the public interest. Assessment includes adequate replacement value of property and land. Assessment standards are also associated with other standards, such as scope of assignment, land property and structures valuation, farmland property valuation, valuation of property with particular business, business valuation, and inspection of cases under consideration.

45. Other related laws/regulations:

(i) Government Regulation concerning Environmental Permit, Ministry of Environment Regulation No. 17/2012 where vulnerable/severely affected people are identified as early as possible through the Social Impact Assessment of AMDAL that also seeks participation guidance from local communities in order to obtain the AMDAL and Environmental Permit Issuance. This is likewise provided for in previous environmental laws.

(ii) Law No. 11/2009 on Social Welfare and its implementing regulation Ministry of Social Welfare Decree No. 39/2012 on Delivery of Welfare. Vulnerable/severely affected people are identified as early as possible through the Social Impact Assessment of AMDAL as referred to in the Environmental Law no. 32/2009 on Environmental Protection and Management; Indonesia Government.

(iii) PP. 71/2008 On the Third Amendment to Government Regulation No. 48 / 1994; (PP. 27/1996 jo and PP. 79/1999 jo); Basic Law Government regulation that relates to tax incentive or the income tax rate of land and/or building ownership transfer.

(iv) Law 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2007 No. 68, Supplement of State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No. 4725) provides that development and land acquisition in the public interest should be carried out in accordance with regional spatial planning.

(v) Act No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights describes vulnerable groups: the elderly, children, the poor, pregnant women and people with disabilities. It also recognizes the differences in and the needs of, adat or customary law communities that have to be observed and protected by the law of society and Government” as well as the “Cultural identity of adat law communities, including rights to ulayat (traditional or customary) land that need protection.” It espouses that the acquisition of ulayat land by Government must be done through due process of law following the free, prior and informed consent of adat

communities

B. Asian Development Bank (ADB) Policy

46. The ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) combines three of its key safeguard policies; environment, involuntary resettlement and indigenous peoples (IP).23 It aims to promote sustainability by managing potential environmental and social risks. The Paneki RWSS subproject does not trigger IP safeguard, and therefore, no IP plan is required. The Paneki RWSS subproject will result in land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, and the LARP is prepared to elaborate the displaced persons’

#############################################################23

Source: http://www.adb.org/documents/safeguard-policy-statement

(*#

#

#

entitlements, the income and livelihood strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring, budget, and time bound implementation schedule. The subproject is considered category B as less than 200 persons will experience significant impact as per ADB SPS.24

47. Involuntary Resettlement. The objectives of the ADB safeguards policy are to avoid involuntary resettlement whenever possible; to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring design alternatives; and to enhance, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all displaced and vulnerable persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels, and to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups.

48. The involuntary resettlement safeguard covers physical displacement (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and economic displacement (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary land acquisition, or (iii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. It covers them whether such losses and involuntary restrictions are full or partial, permanent or temporary.

49. The following ADB SPS principles are stipulated and will also apply to this subproject: (i) early screening of subprojects for past, present and future involuntary resettlement impacts; (ii) conduct of survey and census of displaced persons including gender analysis related to involuntary resettlement impacts; (iii) conduct of meaningful consultations with APs, host communities, non-government organizations (NGOs) in the region;(iv) developing measures to improve or at least restore the livelihoods of APs to pre-project levels; (v) provision of needed assistance to physically and economically displaced persons; (vi) improving living standards of the displaced poor, vulnerable groups to at least national minimum standards of living; (vii) developing procedures in an equitable, transparent, consistent manner; (viii) ensuring that all APs without land title are provided resettlement assistance and compensation for non-land assets lost; (ix) preparation of resettlement plan; (x) timely and full disclosure, and implementation of resettlement plan as part of a larger development program; (xi) pay full compensation, relocation and resettlement assistance prior to physical and or economic displacement; and (xii) monitor and assess the outcomes and impacts of involuntary resettlement.

50. Involuntary resettlement does not apply for negotiated land acquisition (land acquisition with willing buyer-willing seller). ADB encourages the borrower/client to acquire land and other assets through a negotiated settlement wherever possible, based on meaningful consultation with affected persons, including those without legal title to assets. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiate settlement to ensure that those people who enterinto negotiated settlements will maintain the same or better income and livelihood status.

51. Other Policies. The ADB policy on gender and development adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring

#############################################################24

The involuntary resettlement impacts of an ADB-supported project are considered significant if 200 or more persons will experience major impacts, which are defined as (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive assets (income generating). ADB financed projects are classified into the following IR categories: (i) Category A: a proposed project is likely to have significant involuntary resettlement impacts; (ii) Category B: a proposed project includes involuntary resettlement impacts that are not deemed significant; and (iii) Category C: a proposed project has no involuntary resettlement impacts. Projects which entail physical and/or economic displacement require the preparation of a resettlement plan.#

(+#

#

#

participation of women and that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for development activities.

52. Another key policy is the ADB Public Communications Policy that seeks to encourage the participation and understanding of people and other stakeholders affected by ADB-assisted activities. Information sharing on ADB-funded projects should start early in the preparation phase and continue throughout all stages of project development, to facilitate dialogue with affected people and other stakeholders.

C. Gap Analysis

53. The GoI enhanced its country system in order to address land acquisition issues for development projects in the public interest. The new Land Acquisition Law No. 2/2009 and its implementing rules and regulations approximate harmonization with the ADB SPS of 2009. The new law grants that persons with no legal title over the land they occupy or utilize are entitled to compensation25 for improvements found thereon, including compensation for job and business losses, moving cost, 26 etc. A land acquisition plan also needs to be prepared by the agency requiring land. People affected by land acquisition are consulted and their complaints heard and resolved inthe most expeditious way during the planning and implementation of land acquisition.

54. There are still some gaps between the new Land Acquisition Law of Indonesia with the ADB SPS but some gaps have been bridged by the provisions of other relevant laws. Remaining gaps revolve around (i) the provision of livelihood recoveryprograms for severely affected people and vulnerable groups to ensure that their lives will not be worse off due to the project, (ii) relocation assistance for physically displaced residents and (iii) transition allowance. A comparison between ADB SPS 2009 and GoIregulations on involuntary resettlement is presented below along with gap filling measures proposed as project policies.

Table 22. Assessment on Involuntary Resettlement Policy Gap

PrinciplesGoI Laws: Law 2/2012,

Implementing Regulations & Perpres

62/2018

ADB Policy Project Policy

Screening of the project.

The legal framework lacks a stand-alone screening requirement for involuntary resettlement impacts. There is no explicit stipulation for conducting a screening and assessment of impacts when land acquisition involves land purchase.

Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement.

Screen the sub-project to identify involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Sub project triggers involuntary resettlement and sub-project with category A as per SPS will not be selected.

Meaningful consultation

The legal framework provides greater protection of human rights to children, the poor, and the disabled, also against discrimination to women.

Pay attention to the needs of vulnerable groups, especially those below the poverty line, the

Meaningful consultation shall pay attention to the vulnerable groups (the poor, the landless, the elderly, women and

#############################################################25

See Act No.2/2012 Elucidation of Article 40.26

Elucidation of Article 40 of Law No. 2/2012 with the following provisions: For building rights or land use right, Compensation granted to the holder of building right or use rights on buildings, plants, or otherobjects related to land owned by him/her, while Compensation on land granted to the holder of the ownership or management rights.

("#

#

#



62/2018


However, it does not mandate to afford special attention to the needs of vulnerable groups and to ensure their participation in consultations. Some key groups may not be considered as vulnerable (e.g., women, the landless, and those without legal title to land.

landless, the elderly, women and children, Indigenous Peoples, and those without legal title to land, and ensure their participation in consultations applied.

children, Indigenous Peoples, and those without legal title to land). Ensure their participation in consultations.

Negotiated land acquisition

A government regulation on negotiated settlement provides for a procedure to implement direct purchase for parcels of land of 5ha and less; however eminent domain may still be triggered if negotiations fail. There may be no option for an affected person to opt out from the deal.

Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement

Negotiated land acquisition shall be undertaken in a transparent, free from intimidation, compensation at replacement cost. Independent party shall be mobilized to ensure that the negotiations are fair and transparent.

Level of compensation and bases of calculationDepreciation of affected structure value

According to Law 2 of 2012, compensation will be provided based on valuation of independent appraiser that cover (i) land; (ii) over ground and underground spaces; (iii) building; (iv) plants; (v) objects related to land and/or;vi) other appraisable loss such loss of business, jobs, change of profession, and moving costs.Tax incentive is provided to: (a) person who supports the project; (b) person who does not file a complaint related to project location determination and/or compensation.Law is silent on issue of application of depreciation when calculating compensation for affected structures. Valuation standard set by Independentappraisers’ association (MAPPI, 2018) does not apply depreciation for

Compensation rate will be calculated at full replacement cost to be determined by an independent appraiser experienced in assessing acquired assets. For involuntary resettlement, no deduction on taxes and administrative costs for affected lands, as well as depreciation in the value of the affected structure will be applied.

Compensation will cover all losses set forth in the Law 2 of 2012.

The principle of full replacement cost will be applied. In case of involuntary resettlement, capital gains tax and the costs of transferring ownership, including the cost of new land certificates, will not be deducted from the compensation of those who will lose lands.

In case there will be deduction of tax for negotiated land acquisition, the deduction should be clearly consulted and agreed by the affected persons.

Compensation at full replacement cost for affected structures will

($#

#

#



62/2018


physical condition of the affected building

27. For

affected buildings, MAPPI applies solatium (emotional compensation) of 10% - 30% of the total compensation for physical loss.

be determined based on thereplacement cost of a new building without any depreciation

28.

Compensation for land users (tenant farmers/croppers/ sharecroppers)

Perpres 62/2018 stipulated that compensation should consider the cost of mobilization, cost for moving, house rent during the transition period, and loss of income according to valuation by independent appraisalLaw 2/2012 and its elucidation, 71/2012 stipulate that owners of trees/plans areentitled for compensation of affected trees/plants.

Compensation for affected land and non-land assets should be provided at replacement cost.

Compensation forsharecroppers be provided based on losses at replacement cost.

Compensation and assistance to displaced persons without legal title or any recognizable legal rights

The legal framework provides compensation and assistance for displaced persons without tittle or any recognizable legal rights to land unless their legitimate claims cannot be proven/recognized prior to land LAR implementation. However, application of full replacement cost for people utilizing land has been owned by the agency needing the land is unclear.

Ensure displaced persons without titles or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation at replacement cost for loss of non-land assets.

The principle to provide compensation for non-land assets at replacement cost will be applied.Assistance in the form of livelihood restoration and relocation assistance will be provided.

Assistance to non-land rights holders

Article 36 of Perpres 71 of 2012 indicates the task of appraiser to carry out the appraisal of the amount of compensation which includes: a. Land; b. Space above and below the surface of the land; c. Buildings; d. Plants;

Physically and Economically displaced persons are provided transitional support and development assistance, such as land

Assistance in the form of livelihood restoration will be provided.

#############################################################27 Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 204). Land Acquisition Assessment for Development for the

Public Interest. Code of Ethics Indonesia Appraisers and Indonesia Standard, 2018, Jakarta28

Compensation will be based on i) the market value; ii) transaction costs; iii) accrued interest; iv) transition costs and repairs; v) other applicable payments.

(%#

#

#



62/2018


Transitional support

e. Objects related to the land; and/or f. Other appraisable loss” means nonphysical loss equivalent to money value, for example, loss due to loss of business or job, cost of change of location, cost of change of profession, and loss of value of the remaining property.)The law and regulations stipulate on compensation for affected asset, yet do not stipulate on the assistance to the non-land rights holders and other economic loss.There is no legal basis foradditional “transitional support/allowance”.

development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities.

Transitional support and development assistance will be included in the total cost born by displaced persons. Institution needing land can address this through livelihood restoration measures.

High Risk of Impoverishment

Not covered in new Land Law but Law No. 11/2009 on Social Welfare and its implementing regulation.Ministry of Social Welfare Decree No. 39/2012 states: To cover or identify vulnerable / severely impacted people by the project as early as possible it can be covered in Social Impact Assessment of AMDAL as referred in Environmental Law no. 32/2009 and other relevant Government Regulationon Environmental Permits.

Particular attention must be given to the needs of poor and vulnerable APs that face the risk of further marginalization andimpoverishment.

Livelihood restoration measures or program will be provided to severely affected and vulnerable AHs.

Severely affected household and other vulnerable groups willbe identified at resettlement planning stage. Livelihood restoration assistance will be provided to them through social program in collaboration with the local government

Public disclosure Planning for land acquisition by the Office of the Governor at preparation stage and implementation of land acquisition by BPN will be carried out by holding public meetings and consultations, and results of surveys and appraisal of affected assets will be disclosed to the public.

The draft and agreed social safeguardplanning document at TA, and the draft and agreed updated social safeguard planning document at project implementation will be disclosed to the APs and other stakeholders in accessible forms,

Pre-IOL and post-IOL consultations will be held with stakeholders and entitled parties. The approved social safeguard planning document will be disclosed to entitled parties and other stakeholders in accessible forms, languages and places, and posted on the ADB website.Monitoring reports during implementation will likewise be posted

(&#

#

#



62/2018


languages and places. The same will be posted on the ADBwebsite.

on the ADB website.

Monitoring at Project Implementation

BPN carries out the monitoring and evaluation towards the control, ownership, utilization and benefits of the results of the Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest.BPN is only responsible in the monitoring implementation phase and delivering result excluding planning and preparation stages.

Monitor and assess involuntary resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of displaced persons, and whether the objectives of the LARP have beenachieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of involuntary resettlement monitoring.Disclose monitoring reports.

English versions of social safeguard planning document implementation M & E reports will be submitted to the ADB and results posted on the ADB website

D. Project Resettlement Principles

55. Based on the gap analysis presented in Table 23, this LARP has been prepared and formulated to meet Indonesian Laws and regulations and the ADB’s SPS. TheLARP is to guide the subproject’s land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process to support compliance with Indonesian Law and ADB SPS. The objective of resettlement policy is to improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all APs, especially vulnerable groups so that the living standard of APs do not become worse off compared to pre-project levels.

56. Based on the Indonesian Laws and regulations and the ADB’s SPS, thefollowing principles will be applied for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement in all the Subproject components:

(i) Avoid involuntary resettlement as much as possible. If this is not possible, impacts shall be minimized by exploring project and design alternatives. Efforts to minimize resettlement impact will be continued during implementation.

('#

#

#

(ii) Screen sub-project components during feasibility study or before preparation of resettlement plan to identify involuntary resettlement impacts and risks and thelikelihood of impacts per subproject activity.

(iii) Carry out culturally appropriate and gender-sensitive social impact assessments(SIA) to assess potential impacts on APs particularly with affected vulnerablegroups.

(iv) Conduct meaningful consultations with affected APs, stakeholders, concerned NGOs, and community groups to solicit their participation across land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process and monitoring. Inform APs onthe land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process, their entitlements, and compensation and assistance options. Pay attention to the need of vulnerable groups, especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, and those without legal title to land and ensure their participation in consultations.

(v) Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate the affectedpersons’ concerns

(vi) Improve or at least restore the livelihood of the APs through (a) land-based income and livelihood program; (b) replacement of assets with equal or higher value; (c) compensation at full replacement cost for lost assets; and (d) additional assistance through benefit sharing where possible.

(vii) Assist and compensate APs without title or any recognizable legal rights to land for non-land assets at replacement cost.

(viii) Pay compensation for lost land and non-land assets prior to physical or economic displacement. Civil works will not commence until APs are fully compensated, and other entitlements take place.

(ix) Disclose the LARP document and its updates, if required to the APs and otherstakeholders in an accessible place and a form and understandable language.The LARP will be disclosed on subproject and ADB’s website.

(x) Negotiated land acquisition will follow procedure in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner principles and be confirmed trough written record and verified by an independent third party.

(xi) Monitor implementation of the resettlement planning and resettlement outcomes and impacts on the standards of living of APs. Disclose the monitoring reports onthe subproject’s website and make it available on the project office;

(xii) The EA will ensure that no physical displacement or economic displacement occur until (i) compensation at full replacement cost has been paid to each AP for subproject components that are ready to be constructed; (ii) other entitlements listed in the entitlement matrix have been provided to the APs; and (iii) livelihood restoration program is in place to help APs improve, or at least restore, their incomes and livelihoods.

57. According to the Indonesian legal framework, land acquisition less than 5 hacan be undertaken through direct transaction with the land-owners.29 . The S3RBO as the institution needing the land will conduct land acquistion in coordination with the Sigi District Agraria and Spatial Plannng Office (Sigi District ATR/BPN Office).

#############################################################29

See Presidential Regulation 148 of 2015.

*)#

#

#

V. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION, AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE

58. This chapter discusses the required approach and plan for consultation and information disclosure with subproject stakeholders impacted by the land acquisition process. The approach has been developed to adhere to the requirements set out in relevant national laws and regulation as well as the ADB SPS.

59. Stakeholders involved in involved in the LARP preparation, updating, implementation and monitoring of the subproject are described as follows :

a. Affected persons. People who are directly affected by land acquistion activities include land and trees owners.

b. National agency. The Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR) is the executing agency as well as the implementing agency, where the Project is directly connected through the Center of Ground and Water directorate

c. Regional institutions. The Sulawesi III River Basin Organization (S3RBO) which is the Project Implementing Unit (PIU) for this subproject.

d. Sigi District Land Office (Kantor ATR/BPN Kabupaten Sigi) who will involve in the land acquisition implementation.

e. Sigi District Local Government that are involved directly with the implementation of the subproject. The LG will provide support during operation and also responsible for utilizing and follow up on how to maintain and mitigating the future subproject impact

f. Subdistrict and Village Government which will support in facilitation the planningand implementation stage of land acquisition. They also will provide leadership for public mobilization to support the subproject.

g. Other stakeholders who are important to the implementation of subproject, includes community based organization (such as WUAs, BPD) and community leaders. They have good understanding of the dynamic of the community,therefore they can partnered with to minimize some of negative impacts of the subproject

60. The Indonesian legal framework and ADB's SPS and Public Communications Policy emphasizes the application of meaningful consultation and participation of APs and communities in development projects. The elements of meaningful consultation include:

a. begins early in the project preparation stage and is carried out on an on-going basis throughout the project cycle;

b. provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily accessible to affected people;

c. is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion;

d. is gender inclusive and responsive to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups;

e. is held at a time and venue convenient for women to ensure at least 30% women participation; and

f. Enables the incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders into decision-making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues.

*!#

#

#

61. Meaningful consultations will be carried out with the entitled parties/APs including vulnerable groups to ensure participation from planning up to implementation. Particular attention will be provided to the needs of vulnerable group and ensure their participation.

A. Public Consultation and Participation during LARP Preparation

62. During LARP preparation, a total of 7 consultation meetings were conducted from October 2019 to July 2020. The meetings were attended by EA, IA, DGHS, PDAM, Directorate of Sistem Pengolahan Air Minum (SPAM)/Drinking Water supply system Development, Badan Perencanaan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Daerah

(BP3D)/Regional Research and Development Planning Agency Sulawesi Province, Cipta Karya dan Sumber Daya Air (CIKASDA)/Human Settlement and Water Resources of Central Sulawesi Province, Palu City Public Works, BadanPenanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD)/Regional Disaster Management, community, head of subdistricts, villages and other stakeholder as can be seen in the Table 23. A total of 9 consultations and FGDs with women were carried out on 11 October 2019, 2 & 12 March, 10 & 27 June, 4, 7, 15 & 16 July 2020. During consultation on 11 October 2019, information regarding the subproject was disseminated to the participants. Some concerns arise during consultation on 2 March 2020 such as the wish for the project to not affect the community's livelihood. During the meeting, the land required for the weir and transmission pipeline was informed to the participants. There was also a suggestion to explain more about RWSS. The same suggestion was delivered during consultation on 12 March and 27 June 2020. During consultation on 12 March 2020, the Local Government of Sigi Regency, through Assistant II informed the willingness to provide access for agriculture development and institutional access to farmer groups for marketing and village tourism. The consultation on 10 June 2020 is to set the schedule of inventory of losses which attended by the land owners. Consultations on 27 June, 4 & 7 July 2020 are to discuss some issues includes livelihood restoration program for vulnerable households.

63. FGDs held on 15-16 July 2020 in Loru and Pombewe Village were attended by 100% women (25 women). FGDs were conducted to get more women's voices on the perception on the subproject and land acquisition (due to women's participation in the consultation is quite low) and determine the role of family members in the decision-making process in the family, including earning a living, determining household needs, children's education, meetings with the community members, and decision-making in general. Opinions of women on income restoration was discussed with the participants in FGDs. Participants agreed with the subproject plan because it is for public interest. Regarding land acquisition process, women in FGDs handed over it to the man in the family.

64. Summary of consultations, agenda, participants and key points of the consultations are presented in the table below. Minutes of public consultation meeting is presented in Appendix 9.

#

!"#

#

# #

Ta

ble

23

.C

on

su

lta

tio

ns

He

ld d

uri

ng

Pre

pa

rati

on

of

LA

RP

No

Da

teL

oc

ati

on

Ob

jec

tiv

eP

art

icip

an

t (M

/ F

)K

ey

po

ints

of

co

ns

ult

ati

on

A

Pla

nn

ing

Sta

ge

1

11

Octo

be

r 2

01

9

Sw

iss B

ell

Ho

tel P

alu

C

ity

Info

rma

tio

n

dis

se

min

atio

n

reg

ard

ing

PA

SIG

AL

A

RW

SS

pla

nn

ing

To

tal: 8

8 p

ers

on

sF

em

ale

: 3

2 (

36

.4%

) M

ale

: 5

6 (

63

.6%

)

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

:-

DG

WR

- D

ire

cto

rate

Ge

ne

ral o

f H

um

an

Se

ttle

me

nts

- H

ea

d o

f G

rou

nd

an

d R

aw

Wa

ter,

DG

WR

- D

ire

cto

rate

of

SP

AM

De

ve

lop

me

nt

- D

ire

cto

rate

o

f N

atu

ral

Re

so

urc

es

Ne

two

rk

De

ve

lop

me

nt

- B

P3

D C

en

tra

l S

ula

we

si P

rovin

ce

- C

IKA

SD

A

Off

ice

o

f C

en

tra

l S

ula

we

si

Pro

vin

ce

- B

PP

D o

f P

alu

City

- P

alu

City P

ub

lic W

ork

s-

BP

PD

Sig

i R

eg

en

cy

- B

PP

D D

on

gg

ala

Re

ge

ncy

- D

on

gg

ala

Re

ge

ncy P

ub

lic W

ork

s O

ffic

e-

S3

RB

O-

Ce

ntr

al

Su

law

esi

Pro

vin

ce

R

esid

en

tia

l In

fra

str

uctu

re C

en

ter

- P

DA

M o

f P

alu

City

- P

DA

M o

f D

on

gg

ala

Re

ge

ncy

- K

asa

tke

r fo

r S

ett

lem

en

t In

fra

str

uctu

re

Imp

lem

en

tatio

n

in

Ce

ntr

al

Su

law

esi

Pro

vin

ce

- K

asa

tke

r P

JP

A-

AD

B-

Pro

ject

Ma

na

ge

me

nt

Co

nsu

lta

nt

- W

orl

d B

an

k D

ED

Co

nsu

lta

nts

- In

form

atio

nd

isse

min

ate

d:

a.

Th

e

PA

SIG

AL

A

Dri

nkin

g

Wa

ter

Syste

m

De

ve

lop

me

nt

Pla

n is

a

R

eg

ion

al

SP

AM

so

th

at

pla

nn

ing

a

nd

d

eve

lop

me

nt

au

tho

rity

is

in

th

e

Ce

ntr

al

Su

law

esi

Pro

vin

cia

l G

ove

rnm

en

t.

Ho

we

ve

r,

the

R

eg

ion

al

SP

AM

d

eve

lop

me

nt

will

b

e

fun

de

d b

y t

he

Asia

n D

eve

lop

me

nt

Ba

nk

(AD

B)

an

d

Wo

rld

B

an

k.

Th

ere

fore

, th

e

pro

vin

cia

l g

ove

rnm

en

t m

ust

pla

y

an

a

ctive

ro

le in

th

is p

lan

nin

g.

b.

Th

e s

co

pe

of

PA

SIG

AL

A R

eg

ion

al S

PA

M

inclu

de

s t

he

go

ve

rnm

en

t o

f S

igi

Re

ge

ncy

an

d

Pa

lu

City

an

d

Do

ng

ga

la

Re

ge

ncy.

Ho

we

ve

r,

this

R

eg

ion

al

SP

AM

se

rvic

e

on

ly e

xis

ts i

n t

he

Sig

i R

eg

en

cy a

nd

th

e

Pa

lu C

ity.

c.

In a

cco

rda

nce

w

ith

a

pp

lica

ble

la

ws a

nd

re

gu

latio

ns

tha

t P

AS

IGA

LA

R

eg

ion

al

SP

AM

is

th

e

au

tho

rity

o

f th

e

pro

vin

cia

l g

ove

rnm

en

t.

Th

ere

fore

, th

ep

rovin

cia

l g

ove

rnm

en

t is

re

qu

ire

d

to

pro

vid

e

the

la

nd

ne

ed

ed

fo

r th

e W

TP

a

nd

re

se

rvo

ir

de

ve

lop

me

nt

pla

ns.

d.

In c

on

ne

ctio

n w

ith

th

e d

ecis

ion

to

ha

ve

aw

ate

r so

urc

e f

rom

th

e W

un

o R

ive

r, S

alu

ki

Riv

er

an

d P

an

eki R

ive

r, it

is n

ece

ssa

ry t

o

invo

lve

co

mm

un

ity

pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n

thro

ug

h

pu

blic

co

nsu

lta

tio

ns

esp

ecia

lly

for

lan

d

acq

uis

itio

n.

2

2 M

arc

h

20

20

Gu

mb

asa

Ir

rig

atio

n

Ob

se

rve

r O

ffic

e,

Ka

raja

Co

mm

un

ity

Co

nsu

lta

tio

n

Me

etin

g o

n

pla

nn

ing

"D

eta

il

To

tal: 3

3F

em

ale

: 6

(1

8.2

%)

Ma

le:

27

(8

1.8

%)

- T

he

la

nd

re

qu

ire

d

for

the

w

eir

a

nd

tr

an

sm

issio

np

ipe

w

as

info

rme

d

to

the

p

art

icip

an

ts.

!!#

#

# #No

Da

teL

oc

ati

on

Ob

jec

tiv

eP

art

icip

an

t (M

/ F

)K

ey

po

ints

of

co

ns

ult

ati

on

Le

mb

ah

S

tre

et

De

sig

n o

f th

e

Re

ha

bili

tatio

n o

f th

e R

aw

Wa

ter

Su

pp

ly S

yste

m

for

PA

SIG

AL

A

Ce

ntr

al

Su

law

esi"

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

:##

- S

3R

BO

- S

igi P

ub

lic W

ork

s

- S

igi L

oca

l G

ove

rnm

en

t-

CIK

AS

DA

Se

rvic

e-

DE

D C

on

su

lta

nt

- H

ea

d o

f P

om

be

we

, L

oru

, L

olu

an

d M

pa

na

u

Vill

ag

e-

Co

mm

un

ity

su

rro

un

din

g

pro

ject

inclu

de

s

P3

A/w

ate

r u

se

r fa

rme

rs

asso

cia

tio

n

of

aff

ecte

d v

illa

ge

s&

Ga

po

kta

n/f

arm

ers

gro

up

o

f a

ffe

cte

d v

illa

ge

s-

BP

D o

f a

ffe

cte

d v

illa

ge

- C

om

mu

nity le

ad

er

of

Po

mb

ew

e-

Su

bd

istr

ict

rep

rese

nta

tive

- T

he

re a

re s

ug

ge

stio

ns t

oco

nd

uct

an

oth

er

co

nsu

lta

tio

n

me

etin

g

by

pre

se

ntin

g

co

mm

un

ity

fro

m

4

vill

ag

es

(Po

mb

ew

e

Vill

ag

e,

Lo

ru V

illa

ge

, M

pa

na

u V

illa

ge

an

d

Lo

lu

Vill

ag

e)

be

ca

use

th

ere

a

re

lan

d

ow

ne

rs

in

the

P

an

eki

Riv

er

loca

tio

n,

resid

en

ts o

f th

e 4

vill

ag

es.

3

12

Ma

rch

20

20

Ge

du

ng

P

ram

uka

M

an

da

laP

an

eki

(Ma

nd

ala

P

an

eki S

co

ut

Bu

ildin

g)

Pu

blic

C

on

su

lta

tio

n

Me

etin

g o

n

"Pla

nn

ing

of

Ra

w

Wa

ter

for

the

C

om

mu

nity in

P

om

be

we

V

illa

ge

an

d L

oru

V

illa

ge

, S

igi

Re

ge

ncy"

To

tal:

73

Fe

ma

le:

4(5

.5%

)M

ale

: 6

9(9

4.5

%)

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

:-

DG

WR

- S

3R

BO

- C

en

tra

l S

ula

we

si A

IAT

- C

IKA

SD

AS

erv

ice

-

De

pa

rtm

en

t o

f P

ub

lic W

ork

s S

igi

- D

ep

art

me

nt

of

Ag

ricu

ltu

re-

BA

PP

ED

A S

igi

- C

on

su

lta

nt

- H

ea

d o

f S

igi B

iro

ma

ruS

ub

dis

tric

t-

He

ad

s o

f P

om

be

we

, L

oru

, L

olu

an

d M

pa

na

u

Vill

ag

es

- C

om

mu

nity

su

rro

un

din

g

pro

ject

inclu

de

s

P3

A o

f a

ffe

cte

d vill

ag

es

& a

ffe

cte

d vill

ag

e

farm

er

gro

up

s-

Co

mm

un

ity le

ad

er

- A

ffe

cte

d v

illa

ge

BP

D-

Su

bd

istr

ict

rep

rese

nta

tive

- S

om

e c

om

mu

nitie

s h

ave

ag

ree

d w

ith

th

e

pro

ject

pla

n.

An

oth

er

pu

blic

co

nsu

lta

tio

n

me

etin

g

is

to

be

h

eld

to

sh

ow

w

ate

r d

istr

ibu

tio

n

or

tra

nsm

issio

n

pip

e

so

th

at

the

co

mm

un

ity

ca

n

ha

ve

m

ore

u

nd

ers

tan

din

g.

- T

he

L

oca

l G

ove

rnm

en

t o

f S

igi

Re

ge

ncy,

thro

ug

h

Assis

tan

t II

is

w

illin

g

to

pro

vid

e

acce

ss

for

ag

ricu

ltu

re

de

ve

lop

me

nt

an

d

institu

tio

na

l a

cce

ss

to

farm

er

gro

up

s

for

ma

rke

tin

g a

nd

vill

ag

e t

ou

rism

.

!$#

#

# #No

Da

teL

oc

ati

on

Ob

jec

tiv

eP

art

icip

an

t (M

/ F

)K

ey

po

ints

of

co

ns

ult

ati

on

4

10

Ju

ne

2

02

0P

om

be

we

V

illa

ge

He

ad

’s

Ho

use

Me

etin

g w

ith

P

ote

ntia

l A

ffe

cte

d

Co

mm

un

ity

To

tal:

21

Fe

ma

le:

3 (

14

%)

Ma

le:

18

(8

6%

)

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

:-

He

ad

of

Po

mb

ew

e V

illa

ge

- H

ea

d o

f L

oru

Vill

ag

e-

Po

ten

tia

l A

Hs/A

Ps

- C

om

mu

nity s

urr

ou

nd

ing

, in

clu

din

g P

3A

- H

ea

d o

f R

T P

an

eki

- H

ea

d o

f R

T L

oru

- B

PD

Lo

ru-

BP

D P

om

be

we

- L

an

d o

wn

ers

(AH

s)

- P

U K

ab

. S

igi

- C

on

su

lta

nts

Ag

ree

me

nt

on

sch

ed

ule

of

inve

nto

ry o

f la

nd

an

d t

ree

lo

sse

s.

Inve

nto

ry o

f lo

sse

s w

ill b

e

sta

rte

d o

n 1

4 J

un

e 2

02

0a

nd

att

en

de

d b

y t

he

lan

d o

wn

ers

.

# # #

5

4Ju

ly

20

20

Lo

ru V

illa

ge

M

ee

tin

g H

all

Pu

blic

co

nsu

lta

tio

nre

ga

rdin

g t

he

P

an

eki R

ive

r R

aw

Wa

ter

Syste

m

To

tal: 4

2F

em

ale

: 6

(14

%)

Ma

le:

36

(86

%)

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

:-

S3

RB

O-

De

pa

rtm

en

t o

f P

ub

lic W

ork

s S

igi

- C

ika

sd

a S

erv

ice

- M

em

be

r o

f D

PR

D

Sig

i-S

igi

Ag

ricu

ltu

ral

Se

rvic

e-

BP

3D

Sig

i-

Co

nsu

lta

nt

- H

ea

d o

f L

oru

Vill

ag

e-

Lo

ru V

illa

ge

PP

L-

BP

D L

oru

Vill

ag

e-

Wa

tch

er

of

the

Pa

ne

ki R

ive

r-

Su

bvill

ag

e h

ea

d-

Co

mm

un

ity le

ad

er

- H

ea

d S

igi B

iro

ma

ruS

ub

dis

rict

- C

om

mu

nity

su

rro

un

din

g,

inclu

din

g

P3

A,

Ga

po

kta

n-

Su

bd

istr

ict

rep

rese

nta

tive

- In

form

atio

n d

isse

min

ate

d:

1)

Th

e

da

ma

ge

d

irri

ga

tio

n

syste

m

will

b

e

ha

nd

led

2)

Th

e c

rop

pin

g p

att

ern

will

be

ad

juste

d a

nd

a

pp

lied

3)

Ea

ch

vill

ag

e m

ust

ha

ve

its

ow

n t

ub

4)

Th

ere

mu

st

be

a p

rog

ram

fo

r re

fore

sta

tio

n

eve

ry y

ea

r5

) W

ate

r m

an

ag

em

en

t a

nd

w

ate

r m

ain

ten

an

ce

is

su

pe

rvis

ed

b

y m

em

be

rs

of

DP

RD

Sig

i6

)M

an

ag

ing

w

ate

r to

b

e

use

d

as

wa

ter

tou

rism

with

sym

bo

ls o

f lo

ca

l w

isd

om

or

ch

ara

cte

ristics a

s a

to

uri

st

att

ractio

n7

)T

he

co

mm

un

ity

of

Lo

ru vill

ag

e a

gre

e to

th

e

imp

lem

en

tatio

n

of

pla

nn

ing

a

nd

co

nstr

uctio

n o

f ra

w w

ate

r su

pp

ly s

yste

m.

Th

ey a

gre

e w

ith

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n a

s lo

ng

as

it is b

ase

d o

n t

he

ma

rke

t ra

te.

8)

Th

e c

om

mu

nity

of

Lo

ru V

illa

ge

wa

nt

to b

e

invo

lve

d in

th

e c

on

str

uctio

n o

f P

an

eki ra

w

wa

ter.

!%#

#

# #No

Da

teL

oc

ati

on

Ob

jec

tiv

eP

art

icip

an

t (M

/ F

)K

ey

po

ints

of

co

ns

ult

ati

on

9)

Re

co

rds o

f in

pu

t fr

om

all

co

mm

un

itie

s w

ill

be

in

clu

de

d in

min

ute

s o

f m

ee

tin

g a

nd

th

e

ove

rall

resu

lts o

f th

e s

ocia

liza

tio

n f

rom

4

Vill

ag

es,

Mp

an

au

V

illa

ge

, L

olu

V

illa

ge

, L

oru

Vill

ag

e a

nd

Po

mb

ew

e V

illa

ge

.

- D

uri

ng

th

e m

ee

tin

g,

live

liho

od

re

sto

ratio

n

pro

gra

m w

as a

lso

dis

cu

sse

d.

6

7Ju

ly

20

20

Ma

nd

ala

P

an

eki S

co

ut

Bu

ildin

g

Pu

blic

co

nsu

lta

tio

n

reg

ard

ing

th

e

Pa

ne

ki R

ive

r R

aw

Wa

ter

Syste

m

To

tal: 4

2F

em

ale

: 6

(1

4%

)M

ale

: 3

6 (

86

%)

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

:-

S3

RB

O-

De

pa

rtm

en

t o

f P

ub

lic W

ork

s S

igi

- C

ika

sd

a S

erv

ice

- M

em

be

r o

f D

PR

D S

igi

- S

igi A

gri

cu

ltu

ral S

erv

ice

- B

P3

D S

igi

- C

on

su

lta

nts

-

He

ad

of

Po

mb

ew

e V

illa

ge

- P

om

be

we

Vill

ag

e P

PL

- B

PD

of

Po

mb

ew

e V

illa

ge

- W

atc

he

r o

f th

e P

an

eki R

ive

r-

Su

bvill

ag

e h

ea

d-

Co

mm

un

ity le

ad

er

- H

ea

d S

igi B

iro

ma

ru S

ub

dis

rict

- C

om

mu

nity

su

rro

un

din

g,

inclu

din

g

P3

A&

Ga

po

kta

n-

Su

bd

istr

ict

rep

rese

nta

tive

- In

form

atio

n d

isse

min

ate

d:

1)

Th

e

da

ma

ge

d

irri

ga

tio

n

syste

m

will

b

e

ha

nd

led

2)

Th

e c

rop

pin

g p

att

ern

will

be

ad

juste

d a

nd

a

pp

lied

3)

Ea

ch

vill

ag

e m

ust

ha

ve

its

ow

n t

ub

4)

Th

ere

m

ust

be

a

p

rog

ram

fo

r re

fore

sta

tio

n e

ve

ry y

ea

r5

)S

up

erv

isio

n

of

wa

ter

ma

na

ge

me

nt

an

d

wa

ter

ma

inte

na

nce

is

su

pe

rvis

ed

b

y

Me

mb

ers

of

DP

RD

Sig

i6

)T

he

Po

mb

ew

e v

illa

ge

co

mm

un

ity a

gre

es

to c

arr

y o

ut

the

pla

nn

ing

an

d c

on

str

uctio

n

of

raw

w

ate

r a

nd

p

ipin

g

of

the

P

an

eki

rive

r.7

)P

rovid

e a

dis

cu

ssio

n s

pa

ce

fo

r a

pa

ne

ki

rive

r o

bse

rve

r fo

rum

fo

r 2

d

ays sta

rtin

g

fro

m

the

im

ple

me

nta

tio

n

of

the

so

cia

liza

tio

n8

)P

rovid

ing

p

olic

ies

for

the

p

om

be

we

co

mm

un

ity t

o o

ccu

py H

UN

TA

P9

)T

he

p

om

be

we

vill

ag

e

co

mm

un

ity

wa

nts

to

b

e

invo

lve

d

in

the

co

nstr

uctio

n

of

pa

ne

ki ra

w w

ate

r.1

0)

La

nd

a

cq

uis

itio

n b

ase

d o

n tr

an

sm

issio

n

pip

elin

e w

ill b

e c

on

ve

ye

d b

y t

he

Vill

ag

e

He

ad

. It

is n

ece

ssa

ry t

o i

nvo

lve

th

e H

ea

d

of

RT

an

d t

he

Wa

ter

Use

r F

arm

er

Gro

up

for

me

asu

rem

en

t.1

1)

Re

co

rds o

f in

pu

t fr

om

all

co

mm

un

itie

s w

ill

!&#

#

# #No

Da

teL

oc

ati

on

Ob

jec

tiv

eP

art

icip

an

t (M

/ F

)K

ey

po

ints

of

co

ns

ult

ati

on

be

in

clu

de

d in

min

ute

s o

f m

ee

tin

ga

nd

th

e

ove

rall

resu

lts o

f th

e s

ocia

liza

tio

n f

rom

4

Vill

ag

es,

Mp

an

au

V

illa

ge

, L

olu

V

illa

ge

, L

oru

Vill

ag

e a

nd

Po

mb

ew

e V

illa

ge

.

- D

uri

ng

th

e m

ee

tin

g,

live

liho

od

re

sto

ratio

n

pro

gra

m w

as a

lso

dis

cu

sse

d.

C

Liv

eli

ho

od

Re

sto

rati

on

Pro

gra

m (

req

uir

es

as

se

ss

me

nt)

1

27

Ju

ne

2

02

0A

rea

ne

arb

y

Pa

ne

ki In

take

Fo

llow

ing

up

h

ea

rin

g r

ela

ted

to

th

e P

an

eki

Ra

w W

ate

r S

up

ply

Syste

m

To

tal: 2

2

Wo

me

n:

2(9

.1%

)M

ale

: 2

0(9

0.9

%)

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

:-

S3

RB

O-

De

pa

rtm

en

t o

f P

ub

lic W

ork

s S

igi

- M

em

be

r o

f D

PR

D S

igi

- W

AK

AP

OL

RE

S S

IGI

- C

on

su

lta

nt

- S

ub

dis

tric

t re

pre

se

nta

tive

- C

om

mu

nity s

urr

ou

nd

ing

, in

clu

din

gG

ap

okta

n-

Co

mm

un

ity le

ad

er

- S

ug

ge

stio

ns

to

ho

ld

co

nsu

lta

tio

ns

co

ntin

uo

usly

.

- D

iscu

ssio

no

n

live

liho

od

re

sto

ratio

n

pro

gra

m.

2

15

Ju

ly2

02

0L

oru

Vill

ag

eF

GD

with

w

om

en

To

tal:

13

Fe

ma

le:

13

(10

0%

)

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

: 5

AH

s a

nd

8re

pre

se

nta

tive

s o

f th

e v

illa

ge

rs

- L

an

d a

cq

uis

itio

n-

Ho

use

ho

ld in

co

me

- In

cre

ase

in

ho

use

ho

ld in

co

me

- D

rin

kin

g w

ate

r-

Sa

nita

tio

n

3

16

Ju

ly

20

20

Po

mb

ew

e

Vill

ag

e

FG

D w

ith

w

om

en

To

tal: 1

2F

em

ale

: 1

2 (

10

0%

)

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

:5

AH

s a

nd

7 r

ep

rese

nta

tive

s o

f th

e v

illa

ge

rs

- L

an

d a

cq

uis

itio

n-

Ho

use

ho

ld in

co

me

- In

cre

ase

in

ho

use

ho

ld in

co

me

- D

rin

kin

g w

ate

r-

Sa

nita

tio

n

!"#

#

#

B. Consultation at Implementation Stage of Land Acquistion

65. Consultation will be continued over the course of the implementation stage in relation to land acquisition, implementation of livelihood restoration program and subproject construction. The consultation shall also include negotiations on the amount of compensation for affected land and trees. At these meetings the following shall be disclosed to the attendees, and all records of attendance and discussions shall be maintained and disclosed.

a. An orientation on the Paneki RWSS, subproject designs, schedules of implementation, and identification/introduction of focal/contact persons;

b. Probable benefits, adverse impacts, and mitigating measures to be taken; c. Grievance process; d. Subsequent schedule of meetings and activities, i.e., conduct of DMS-SES; e. Verification of DMS result otherwise known as results of inventory and

identification of ownership, use, and utilization of land by S3RBO with involvement from the District ATR/BPN Office

f. Entitlements/compensation packages and other forms of assistance;g. Valuation methods per result of independent appraiser study

66. Table 24 summarizes information provision and consultations during implementation stages of land acquisition and indicates the responsible institutions.

C. Disclosure

67. A draft of project information booklet (PIB) has been prepared to explain the Paneki RWSS (see Appendix 5). The PIB will be translated into Bahasa Indonesiaand distributed to APs, local governments (villages and sub districts) and other relevant stakeholders. A PIB will be made available in the project and contractor office and will be accessible to APs and stakeholders.

68. The LARP document will be generated and produced in a timely manner and posted by ADB and the DGWR or S3RBO website. LARP will be available at the Project office and can be accessed by APs and stakeholders during project implementation. The Directorate General of Water Resources through the CPMU supported by PMC will prepare a monitoring report on LARP implementation, includes implementation of LRP, and submit the same to ADB for review on a semi-annual basis. The monitoring report should be posted in ADB and DGWR or S3RBO websites as well. No update LARP is required since the inventory of losses has been done following the final engineering design.

!"#

#

# #

Ta

ble

24

.C

on

su

lta

tio

n P

lan

at

Imp

lem

en

tati

on

Sta

ge

of

La

nd

Ac

qu

isit

ion

No!

Sta

ge

/Ac

tiv

itie

s!

Ob

jec

tiv

es!

Me

tho

d!

Ve

nu

e!

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

(M

/F)!

Tim

ing!

Re

sp

on

sib

ilit

y!

I L

an

d A

qc

uis

itio

n

1#

Co

nsu

lta

tio

n o

n

DM

S R

esu

ltC

on

su

lta

tio

n f

oru

m t

o

ve

rify

an

d/o

r a

dju

st

DM

Sre

su

lts

Me

etin

gV

illa

ge

O

ffic

eA

Ps,

Vill

ag

e a

nd

su

b-

dis

tric

t O

ffic

es,

S3

RB

O,

co

nsu

lta

nts

At

lea

st

30

% o

f p

art

icip

an

ts a

re w

om

en

.E

nsu

rep

art

icip

atio

n o

f vu

lne

rab

le g

rou

ps.

De

ce

mb

er-

Ja

nu

ary

20

21

S3

RB

O,

co

nsu

lta

nt,

an

d

He

ad

of

vill

ag

e

2#

Ne

go

tia

tio

n o

f co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

rate

Fre

e a

nd

fa

ir n

eg

otia

tio

ns

ove

r th

e q

ua

ntu

m o

f co

mp

en

sa

tio

n p

er

aff

ecte

d h

ou

se

ho

ld.

Ob

se

rve

d b

y t

hir

d p

art

y

(lo

ca

l N

GO

s/C

SO

s)

Me

etin

gV

illa

ge

O

ffic

eA

Ps,

Vill

ag

e a

nd

su

b-

dis

tric

t O

ffic

es,

S3

RB

O,

co

nsu

lta

nts

(if p

ossib

le

KJP

P a

tte

nd

).

At

lea

st

30

% o

f p

art

icip

an

ts a

rew

om

en

.

Fe

bru

ary

20

21

aft

er

ve

rifica

tio

no

f D

MS

re

su

lt is c

om

ple

ted

a

nd

va

lua

tio

n o

f co

mp

en

sa

tio

n b

y

ap

pra

isa

l is

do

ne

S3

RB

O,

He

ad

of

vill

ag

e,

MU

SP

IKA

, K

JP

P

Info

rme

d t

he

re

su

lt o

f a

pp

rais

al fr

om

KJP

P.

En

su

re p

art

icip

atio

n o

f vu

lne

rab

le g

rou

ps.

3#

Co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

pa

ym

en

tsP

aid

Co

mp

en

sa

tio

nP

aid

by

tra

nsfe

rre

d a

nd

o

bse

rve

d b

y

thir

d p

art

y (

loca

l N

GO

s/C

SO

s)

Vill

ag

e

Off

ice

AP

s,

Vill

ag

e a

nd

su

b-

dis

tric

t O

ffic

es,

S3

RB

O,

AD

B.

At

lea

st

30

% o

f p

art

icip

an

ts a

re w

om

en

. A

tte

ntio

n t

o v

uln

era

ble

g

rou

ps.

Ma

rch

20

21

S3

RB

O,

AD

B

IIL

ive

lih

oo

d R

es

tora

tio

n P

rog

ram

1

Co

nsu

lta

tio

n t

o

Initia

te L

ive

liho

od

Re

co

nfirm

in

co

me

re

sto

ratio

n p

rog

ram

s a

re

still

fea

sib

le a

nd

ge

ne

rally

a

cce

pta

ble

. G

et

the

fe

ed

ba

ck f

rom

AP

s t

he

p

rog

ram

typ

e o

f in

co

me

FG

DV

illa

ge

O

ffic

eV

uln

era

ble

AP

s,

Vill

ag

e

Off

ice

s,

co

mm

un

ity

lea

de

r, S

3R

BO

Ja

n-F

eb

20

20

S3

RB

O

!$#

#

# #

No!

Sta

ge

/Ac

tiv

itie

s!

Ob

jec

tiv

es!

Me

tho

d!

Ve

nu

e!

Pa

rtic

ipa

nts

(M

/F)!

Tim

ing!

Re

sp

on

sib

ilit

y!

resto

ratio

n

2

Co

ord

ina

tio

n

me

etin

g w

ith

th

e

S

igi D

istr

ict

LG

En

su

re t

he

vu

lne

rab

le

gro

up

s w

ill in

clu

de

s in

th

e

Sig

i D

istr

ict

LG

pro

gra

m in

2

02

1 F

Y

Me

etin

gB

ap

pe

da

o

r P

U

Sig

i D

istr

ict

Off

ice

Re

leva

nt

institu

tio

n

with

in t

he

Sig

i D

istr

ict

LG

(i

.e B

ap

pe

da

, P

ub

lic

Wo

rks,

Ag

ricu

ture

A

ge

ncy)

Fe

bru

ary

20

21

S3

RB

O

#

VI.

#

#

#

!"#

#

#

VII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

69. A Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) is a systematic process to receive, evaluate, and address the project-related grievances of affected persons (AP) and/or groups. An information disclosure mechanism in Bahasa will also be in place at subdistrict level to ensure that the local communities are aware of GRM and their potential involvement and responsibilities in the project activities. It shall be delivered during consultation at implementation stage. It is anticipated that all grievances related to benefits and other assistance will be resolved by the IA. If efforts to resolve disputes using the project level grievance procedures remain unresolved or unsatisfactory, complainants can directly send their concerns or complaints with ADB (Southeast Asia Department) through the Indonesia Resident Mission. If the complainants are still not satisfied with the results, as a last resort, they can directly contact the ADB Office of the Special Project Facilitator that is responsible for the problem-solving function of ADB’s Accountability Mechanism 30 . The Office of the Special Project Facilitator procedure can proceed based on the Accountability Mechanism in parallel with the subproject implementation.

70. Grievance related to Inventory of affected assets and compensation will be addressed according to the following procedure:

a. In the case of the AP objected to the result of inventory and identification of affected assets/land acquisition objects, the aggrieved AP may file the objection/grievance through community leader or head of village who will send the complaint to S3RBO LAT or send directly to the S3RBO LATwithin 14 working days since the announcement of the inventory result.

b. If the grievance is accepted, the S3RBO LAT, with involvement from SIgi District ATR/BPN Office staff, shall verify and revise the land maps and/or nominative list.

c. Verification and revision shall be made no later than 14 working days since the receipt of the grievance.

d. In case of different calculation of inventory and identification results and verification, the revision shall be set out into an inventory and identification revised report

e. If the grievance on inventory and identification results are not accepted, the S3RBO LAT shall prepare a rejection report and inform to the agrieved AP, includes reason of the rejection.

71. Grievance related to compensation will be addressed according to the following procedure:

a. In case there is no agreement on the form and/or amount of compensation, an aggrieved AP may bring the grievance/complaint directly to S3RBO LAT or trough community leader or head of village who will submit it to S3RBO LAT.

b. The S3RBO together with the Community Leader and or Village leader will attempt to seek consensus to achieve an acceptable settlement with the aggrieved AP/AH. The S3RBO has within 30 working days to come into agreement with aggrieved AP/AH on the level of compensation for affected assets.

#############################################################30

Complainants can send their concerns to the Office of the Special Project Facilitator using the information at: http://www.adb.org/accountability-mechanism.

!$#

#

#

c. In the case of the negotiation did not reach agreement and aggrieved AP/AH refused to sell the land, S3RBO LAT will inform to the project to find another land and make necessary realignment of the transmission pipeline or weir with intake location.

72. Grievance related to other aspects of the project will be addressed according to the following procedure:

a. An aggrieved AP may bring any complaint either directly to project staff, contractor, community leader or village head who will bring thecomplaint/grievance to the project staff in the field office or subproject officeto seek resolution. Project land acquisition and safeguard unit will send the grievance record to the subproject management.

b. Subproject manager will examine the complaint and within the 15 working days will deliver the decision to the complainant. Project staff will facilitate communication between the complainant and the project management in redressing the grievance. Project staff will document the objection and resolution.

c. If the aggrieved entitled partiy is not satisfied with the decision or handling of the complaint, he/she may bring the grievance, either in writing or verbally to the Mayor within a period of 14 days from the issuance of the decision.

d. The Mayor will decide on the complaint within a period of 30 days by requesting for opinions from (i). The aggrieved enttled party, (ii). S3RBO, (iii) other relevant stakeholders.

e. If the aggrieved AP is not satisfied with the action taken by Mayor on the complaint, she/he may file the complaint to the court for final adjudication.

!%#

#

#

VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE, AND BENEFIT

A. Eligibility

73. The cut-off date sets the time limits to determine eligibility of persons living and/or with assets or interests inside the project areas. Should they be adversely affected, they will be entitled to compensation for their affected assets, including rehabilitation measures as needed, sufficient to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. The cut-of-date for all assets affected for this subproject will be set later when S3RBO LAT conduct the verification of detailed measurement survey. APs will be informed of the cut-off date for the subproject, and any people who settle in the subproject area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation and assistance under the subproject.

B. Entitlement Matrix

74. The subproject will provide the entitlements to the APs according to the specifications set out in Table 25. The entitlement matrix outlined in table below will be included in the TOR for valuation of compensation by appraisers.

!"#

#

# #

Ta

ble

25

.E

nti

tle

me

nt

Ma

trix

No

Imp

ac

t/L

os

sC

ate

go

ryE

nti

tle

d P

ers

on

Su

bp

roje

ct

en

titl

em

en

tIm

ple

me

nta

tio

n I

ss

ue

s

A.

LA

ND

LO

SS

1

Lo

ss o

f a

gri

cu

ltu

re

lan

d

34

AH

s (

14

5A

Ps)

Th

ose

wh

o h

ave

fo

rma

l le

ga

l ri

gh

ts (

ce

rtific

ate

) o

r th

ose

w

ho

se

cla

im

ove

r th

e

lan

d i

s r

eco

gn

ize

d a

s a

fu

ll title

in

clu

din

g

pe

rso

ns o

ccu

pyin

g th

e

sta

te la

nd

in

go

od

fa

ith

•C

ash

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

at

rep

lace

me

nt

co

st

an

d r

efle

ctive

of

fair

ma

rke

t va

lue

at

the

tim

e

of

pa

ym

en

t o

f co

mp

en

sa

tio

n;

or

lan

d

rep

lace

me

nt

with

a

t le

ast

sim

ilar

att

rib

ute

s

to

the

a

cq

uir

ed

la

nd

in

te

rm

of

va

lue

, p

rod

uctivity,

loca

tio

n,

an

d t

itlin

g.

An

y t

axe

s

an

d t

ran

sa

ctio

na

l co

st

bo

rne

by t

he

pro

ject.

•F

ina

ncia

l a

ssis

tan

ce

fo

r th

e r

en

ew

al

of

the

la

nd

o

wn

ers

hip

d

ocu

me

nts

(c

ert

ific

ate

o

r la

nd

do

cu

me

nts

re

co

gn

ize

d a

s f

ull

title

) fo

r th

e

resid

ua

l a

rea

o

f th

e

en

title

d

pe

rso

ns'

lan

d.

•If

th

e

rem

ain

ing

a

ffe

cte

d

lan

d

ca

n’t

be

fu

nctio

ne

d

for

the

sp

ecific

u

se

a

nd

u

tiliz

atio

n,

the

e

ntitle

d

pa

rty

ca

n

ask

for

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

for

the

ir

en

tire

la

nd

a

t re

pla

ce

me

nt

co

st

•V

alu

atio

n o

f co

mp

en

sa

tio

n c

on

du

cte

d b

y

a l

ice

nse

d i

nd

ep

en

de

nt

ap

pra

ise

r. I

t w

ill

be

u

se

d fo

r co

mp

en

sa

tio

n p

aym

en

t b

y

the

L

an

d

Acq

uis

itio

n

Imp

lem

en

tin

g

Te

am

.

•F

or

the

n

eg

otia

ted

la

nd

a

cq

uis

itio

n,

in

ca

se

th

ere

is

d

ed

uctio

n

of

tax

as

pe

r g

ove

rnm

en

t’s r

eq

uir

em

en

ts,

the

am

ou

nt

of

the

ta

x

va

lue

a

nd

th

e

de

du

ctio

n

sh

ou

ld

be

cle

arl

y

co

nsu

lte

d

with

a

nd

a

gre

ed

by t

he

AP

s.

•If

th

e

rem

ain

ing

a

ffe

cte

d

lan

d

is

no

lo

ng

er

via

ble

(t

oo

sm

all

are

as

or

the

sh

ap

e

is

difficu

lt

for

cu

ltiv

atio

n

or

for

ho

usin

g a

nd

if

the

la

nd

ow

ne

r re

qu

ests

th

e

en

tire

p

lot

sh

all

be

re

qu

ire

d

an

d

co

mp

en

sa

ted

by r

ep

lace

me

nt

co

st.

B

LO

SS

OF

TR

EE

S

1

Lo

ss o

f T

ree

s

20

AH

s (

83

AP

s)

Ow

ne

rs,

reg

ard

less

of

land

te

nu

re s

tatu

s (

with

ce

rtific

ate

or

reco

gn

iza

ble

ri

gh

ts,

info

rma

l d

we

llers

,o

ccu

pa

nts

).

• P

ere

nn

ial

tre

es:

co

mp

ensa

tio

n

at

rep

lacem

en

t cost

takin

g in

to a

cco

unt

their

pro

ductivity a

nd

age

.

• T

imb

ers

/tre

es:

co

mp

ensa

tio

n

at

cu

rre

nt

ma

rke

t ra

te b

ase

d o

n a

ge

, ty

pe

of

tree

s a

nd

d

iam

ete

r o

f tr

unk a

t b

rea

st

he

igh

t.

•N

o

de

du

ctio

no

f d

ep

recia

tio

n

for

the

va

lua

tio

n o

f tr

ee

s

•V

alu

atio

n o

f tr

ee

s w

ill b

e d

ete

rmin

ed

by

ind

ep

en

de

nt

ap

pra

ise

r.

•9

0

da

ys

ad

va

nce

n

otice

b

efo

re

ha

rve

stin

g/la

nd

cle

ari

ng

.

C

TE

MP

OR

AR

Y O

R P

ER

MA

NE

NT

IM

PA

CT

S O

N N

ON

-LA

ND

AS

SE

TS

DU

RIN

G C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

1

Te

mp

ora

ry o

r p

erm

an

en

t im

pa

cts

Fo

r th

ose

w

ho

h

ave

fo

rma

l le

ga

l ri

gh

ts •

Fo

r le

ase

pa

ym

en

ts o

f th

e a

ffe

cte

d l

an

d b

y

the

co

ntr

acto

r b

ase

d

on

th

e

ap

plic

ab

le •

30

-60

d

ays

pri

or

no

tice

giv

en

to

th

e

ow

ne

r o

f th

e

lan

d

be

fore

it

isu

se

d

!!#

#

# #No

Imp

ac

t/L

os

sC

ate

go

ryE

nti

tle

d P

ers

on

Su

bp

roje

ct

en

titl

em

en

tIm

ple

me

nta

tio

n I

ss

ue

s

du

e t

o c

on

str

uctio

n

activitie

s

(ce

rtific

ate

) o

r th

ose

w

ho

se

cla

im o

n l

an

d i

s

reco

gn

ize

d

as

a

full

rig

ht

ren

tal

fee

s

an

d

ag

reem

en

ts

with

la

nd

ow

ne

rs.

• F

or

tem

po

rary

impa

ct

on

p

rod

uctive

la

nd

, th

e A

H m

ay c

ho

ose

: (1

) cost

of

the

ren

tal

va

lued

to

be

no

t le

ss t

ha

n t

he

ne

t in

com

e

tha

t w

ill

be

g

en

era

ted

fr

om

p

rod

uctive

affecte

d land;

(2)

Com

pensatio

n f

or

non-land

assets

acquired

(tre

es/p

lants

, str

uctu

re)

perm

anently

affecte

d w

ill b

e c

om

pensate

d a

t re

pla

cem

ent cost.

•Land

will

be

resto

red

to

pre

-pro

ject

conditi

ons

or

even

better

after

the

constr

uctio

n is

com

ple

ted

tem

po

rari

ly b

y c

on

tra

cto

rs.

• T

his

pro

vis

ion

sho

uld

be

stip

ula

ted

in

th

eco

ntr

act/

ag

ree

me

nt

with

civ

il w

ork

sC

on

tra

cto

rs

Th

ose

w

ho

d

o

no

t h

ave

le

ga

l ri

gh

ts

an

d

en

title

me

nts

th

at

ca

n

be

re

co

gn

ize

d

as

full

ow

ne

rsh

ip

• T

he

re

is

no

la

nd

re

nta

lco

sts

du

ring

th

e

pe

rio

d o

f im

pact

La

nd

will

be

resto

red

as i

t w

as b

efo

re t

he

pro

ject,

or

eve

n b

ette

r.

D

OT

HE

R A

PP

RA

ISA

BL

E L

OS

S#

1

Tra

nsa

ctio

n C

ost

34

AH

s (

14

5A

Ps)

Th

e e

ntitled

p

art

y w

ho

lo

st

land

and

no

n-l

an

d

asse

ts

• A

llow

an

ce

to

co

ve

r a

dm

inis

tra

tio

n

cost,

ren

ew

al

of

lan

d o

wn

ers

hip

fo

r re

sid

ua

l la

nd

, a

cqu

ired

La

nd

•V

alu

atio

nw

ill

be

d

ete

rmin

ed

by

ind

ep

en

de

nt

ap

pra

ise

r.

2

Com

pensatio

n for

the w

aiti

ng p

eriods

(inte

rest)

34

AH

s (

14

5A

Ps)

The

part

y

entit

led

to

receiv

e

com

pensatio

n

for

late

paym

ent

•C

ash com

pensatio

n based on th

e risk-f

ree

inte

rest, g

overn

ment bank in

tere

st

•V

alu

atio

nw

ill

be

d

ete

rmin

ed

by

ind

ep

en

de

nt

ap

pra

ise

r.

3

Loss o

f re

sid

ual

Land

0 A

Hs (

0 A

Ps)

Those w

ho h

ave f

orm

al

legal

rights

(c

ert

ificate

) or

those

who

make

cla

im

on

land

and

recogniz

ed

as

legiti

mate

ow

ners

in

clu

din

g

those

who

occupy

sta

te

land

in

•If t

here

are

no r

esid

ual la

nd t

hat

can b

e u

sed

for

a p

urp

ose,

the e

ntit

led p

art

y i

s e

ntit

led t

o

receiv

e c

om

pensatio

n f

or

the e

ntir

e l

and a

t re

pla

cem

ent cost.

•R

efe

r to

the L

and L

aw

No.

2 a

cquis

ition

for

the

entir

e

land

will

be

based

on

consulta

tion

with

la

nd

ow

ners

and

assessm

ent by la

nd a

cquis

ition team

.

!$#

#

# #No

Imp

ac

t/L

os

sC

ate

go

ryE

nti

tle

d P

ers

on

Su

bp

roje

ct

en

titl

em

en

tIm

ple

me

nta

tio

n I

ss

ue

s

good faith

4

Loss o

f re

sourc

e b

ase

(hig

h r

isk o

f im

poverishm

ent)

4 A

Hs (

11 A

Ps)

Entit

led P

art

y w

ho lo

ses

10%

or

more

of

tota

l assets

or

earn

ing

revenue

sourc

es;

Entit

led P

art

y,

poor

and

vuln

era

ble

, re

gard

less

of

the

severity

of

the

impact

•P

art

icip

ate

in

liv

elih

ood re

sto

ratio

n pro

gra

m

(LR

P)

•G

iven the o

pport

unity

to g

et a jo

b r

ela

ted w

ith

the P

roje

ct

•L

RP

w

ill

be

in

teg

rate

dw

ith

Lo

ca

l g

ove

rnm

ent

eco

no

mic

em

po

we

rme

nts

pro

gra

ms w

he

re t

he

pro

ject

is lo

ca

ted

#

!"#

#

#

C. Valuation of Assets

75. Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 204) on the Assessment of Land Acquisition for Development for the Public Interest. The Indonesia Professional Appraisers Society (MAPPI) formulated the standards by adopting the development of international standards (IVS 2011). Standards 204 provides guidelines for assessment of land acquisition object for compensation in land acquisition for development in the public interest. Assessment includes adequate replacement value of property and land. Assessment standards are also associated with other standards, such as scope of assignment, land property and structures valuation, farmland property valuation, valuation of property with particular business, business valuation, and inspection of cases under consideration. A Replacement Cost Study (RCS) shall be conducted by a licensed property appraiser licensed by the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency and the RCS result will be a basis for calculating compensation for affected land and trees.

76. Compensation assessment in this standard includes but not limited to: i) the construction of resettlement; ii) education and motivation programs; iii) provision of working facilities; and iv) business facilities compensation. Assessment approach is specified in the detailed SPI 204 (PPI 04).

Table 26. Assessment Approaches Using Indonesia’s Valuation Standards

Valuation object Calculation basis Approach Remark

Physical: Land or land & structures

Market and Non-Market

Market & Income

Structure &/or Complementary Facility

New replacement cost with adjustments

Cost In principle, valuation standard set by Independent appraisers’ association does not apply depreciation. The depreciation value is given back to the entitled party in the form of a non-physical loss premium for depreciation expense. This premium imposition can be applied as long as there is a written reason behind it and is included in the Scope of Works. The written justification can be in the form of applicable law and regulation, the nominative list or other legal document provided by institution needing the land (PPI 01, clause 3 and 5)

Crops and Trees Markets & reasonable cultivation calculation norms

Cost

Income With the Discounted Cash Flow method for one cycle

Market For non-commercial plant, using references from relevant agencies.

Cost Immature cropsNon-Physical: Adequate replacement of the loss on right relinquishment from landowners who will be given a premium

Market and non-market

Income

Cost

• Based on applicable laws and regulations

• Losses due to termination or closure of business premises.

• Loss of income due to loss of acccess to arrable land for

!$#

#

#

Valuation object Calculation basis Approach Remark

farming can be considered for more than one cropping cycle to 2 years

Transaction cost Based on socio-economic study conducted by expert consultant or applicable laws & regulations

Cost • Cost of moving

• Cost of clearing

• Tax associated costs • Cost of Certificate of Land

Deed Official (PPAT)

Waiting period Compensation (interest)

Based on the risk-free rate, or the government bank deposits interest

Based on applicable laws and regulations

Other physical losses Reparation cost Cost

!%#

#

#

IX. INCOME RESTORATION AND REHABILITATION

77. One of the issues discussed during the meeting on 27 June, 4 & 7 July 2020 is related to livelihood restoration program. The meetings were attended by the community around the subproject area/potential affected households, head of affected villages and subdistrict, community leader, S3RBO, Sigi Public Works and other stakeholders. Considering the inputs from potential AHs during those meetings, the programs to be given to four vulnerable households (11 APs) in this subproject are designed on 10 July 2020 and attended by Head of Villages, field agriculture instructors (PPL), Head of Human Settlement and Water Resources (Cikasda), Central Sulawesi DGWR and consultants. None of the AHs will lose 10% of more of their productive land.

78. Livelihood restoration program will be proposed through the village development planning meeting (Musrenbang Desa ). The S3RBO will continue coordination with the Sigi LG trough the District Public Works to ensure the programs will be implemented as scheduled. The proposed programs can be seen in the Table 27.

Table 27. Proposed Livelihood Restoration Program

No Program

Budget Allocation

(IDR million)from

APBD31

Year Participant OPD32

AHs33

1 Pelatihan Makanan Olahan dari Umbi Umbian (Training on processed food from tuber crops)

25 2021 100 Agriculture Agency

4

2 Bantuan Wirausaha Mandiri(Independent Entrepreneurial Assistance)

50 2021* 100 Social Agency

4

3 Penyuluhan Higienes Makanan dan Minuman (sertifikat dan Izin Usaha Makanan Olahan) / Information Dissemination on Food and Beverage Hygiene (Processed Food Business Certificate and Permit)

25 2021 100 Health Agency

4

Note: it was recurrent programs by theSocial Agency of the Sigi District

79. Gender strategy. The overall subproject categorization for gender is Effective Gender mainstreaming (EGM). It is expected that women, children, people living with disabilities and the elderly can participate and fully benefit from the disaster rehabilitation and reconstruction interventions supported by the project. Gender issues is crucial in the implementation of social safeguard plans as participation to planning activities affect home-based activities that women often engage in to contribute to household income. Thus, the following shall be observed to ensure women’s meaningful participation and be included in the planning document.

#############################################################31 Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD)/Local Government Budget.32 The local bureaucracy (OPD stands for Organisasi Perangkat Daerah). 33

4 Vulnerable Households in this subproject.

!&#

#

#

a. In conducting verification of the DMS and consultations on the land acquistion activities, both women and men will participate in the discussions. Elderly and disabled will also be included (may be by representation).

b. Any meeting and or consulttion will be held at time and venue convenient for women to ensure at least 30% women participation.

c. Both husband and wife will be invited to receive compensation and other allowances/assistance

d. Gender issues will be included in the training to be provided during social safeguards planning document implementation.

e. Women will be given equal chance in getting hired for jobs related to the Project and to receive equal remuneration for the same work as the men.

f. Women will be prioritized in livelihood restoration program.g. Disaggregated monitoring indicators by gender will be developed for

monitoring social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood, and resettlement activities.

'(#

#

#

X. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN

A. Legal Basis

80. The legal basis for determining compensation is UU No. 2/2012 and other related regulations. The land acquisition law regulates that the appraisal for land will be carried out by the appraiser and will include an appraisal for (i) land; (ii) space above and below ground; (iii) buildings; (iv) plants; (v) objects related to land and other assessable losses including loss of work and income. If there is any remaining land that is not economically viable, the land owner has the right to ask for compensation for the entire plot of land. The forms of compensation offered include cash, replacement land, resettlement, share ownership, and other forms agreed by both parties. There will be no deductions for taxes and transaction costs for compensation and no depreciation for lost buildings/structures.

B. Budget and Financing Plans

81. In preparing the plan for Paneki RWSS, the Implementing Agency (Directorate of Water Resources, through S3RBO) will arrange funding sources for different budget components.

82. Budget for land acquisition and compensation for lost of assets (land, crops) will be allocated by the DGWR through “Satker” of Land Acquistion under the Directorated General of Water Resource Management System and Strategy in 2021 Fiscal Year. The budget given in this LARP is only an estimate. During the LARP implementation phase, a valuation assessment for the compensation to be carried out by independent appraisal to ensure that compensation for land and trees/plant assets is carried out based on replacement cost principles. . Budget for LRP will be come from Sigi District LG since the program will be integrated with the LG social program

C. Assumption for Budget Line Items

83. Land. The replacement value for land is based on the prevailing market rate(IDR 50,000 per m2) which comes from the community in the subproject area, middleman, village government, subdistrict head, and BPN. RCS conducted in parallel during IOL/SES by surveyors. Administration cost is IDR 80,000.

84. Plants/Trees. Compensation for trees refers to the current market rate based on the type of tree, size and productivity. The table below shows the unit price of each treeaccording to its category. Besides that, semak belukar (shrubs) that grow on 20 AHs lands will be compensated with the price of IDR 100,000. The market rate was determined by interviewing the tree owners. In addition, 5 interviews were also conducted to wood store in the village and subdistrict for timber tree price and 6 interviews conducted with middleman in Loru (an interview) and Pombewe (5 interviews). The replacement cost study during LARP preparation is to use the calculation of budget estimates. The replacement cost study during LARP preparation is to use the calculation of budget estimates only. Valuation of asset for the compensation payment will be carried out by independent appraisal assessment

')#

#

#

Table 28. The Market Rate of Trees

No Name Total Tree Unit Price per Category (IDR)

Small Medium Big Small Medium Big

1 Aga 9 13 15,000 100,000

2 Awar-awar 3 1 215,000

50,000 50,000

3 Enau/aren 4 300,000

4 Waru 5 6 50,000 200,000

5 Kelor 5 2 15,000 75,000

6 Sirsak (soursop)

2 2 7,500 75,000

7 Kelapa (coconut)

5 25 100,000 1,000,000

8 Jeruk Purut (lime)

3 2 20,000 100,000

9 Rumpun bamboo (bamboo clumps)

6 5 100,000 150,000

10 Kayu Balario

5 7 20,000 250,000

11 Mangga (mango)

4 14 50,000 300,000

12 Kemiri (candlenut)

5 20 1 50,000 150,000 300,000

13 Coklat (chocolate)

16 189 50,000 250,000

14 Kopi (coffee)

1 5 25,000 250,000

15 Durian 1 3 100,000 750,000

16 Sule 2 1 10,000 100,000

17 Sukun 1 1 75,000 300,000

18 Sompo 1 10,000

19 Palem 1 1 10,000 50,000

20 Jati (teak) 14 24 2 35,000 250,000 500,000

21 Mbosi 1 25,000

22 Ngaru 1 150,000

23 Jambu Monyet

1 15,000

24 Nangka (jackfruit)

1 1 20,000 150,000

25 Srikaya 2 1 10,000 75,000

26 Pohon Jawa

2 10,000

27 Belimbing (starfruit)

4 150,000

28 Asam 1 500,000

29 Langsat 1 300,000

30 Lekatu 8 20,000

31 Gersen 4 100,000

'*#

#

#

No Name Total Tree Unit Price per Category (IDR)

Small Medium Big Small Medium Big

32 Rambutan 1 150,000

33 Lamtoro 4 1 10,000 100,000

34 Sahang 1 100,000

35 Bendo 1 200,000

36 Bau 3 3 50,000 150,000

Total 111 77 273

D. The Summary of Cost Estimation

85. The estimated cost for LARP Paneki RWSS is IDR 1,769,587,400 or USD

120,050.16 as can be seen in the table below. The cost estimation for affected land can be seen in Appendix 6 and estimation for plants can be seen in Appendix 7.

Table 29. Cost Estimation for LARP Paneki RWSS

Budget Component Cost Estimation (IDR) USD

1. COMPENSATION

a. Land 1,326,375,000 89,982.29

b. Plants/Trees 107,035,000 7,261.34

2. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION

PROGRAM

100,000,00 6,784.08

Subtotal (direct cost) 1,533,410,000 104,027.71

3. Operational Cost (BPOP)34

57,336,400 3,889.75

4. Litigation fee at court35

25,500,000 1,729.94

5. Contingency (10% of the direct cost) 153,341,000 10,402.77

Total 1,769,587,400 120,050.16

#

#

# #

# #

#############################################################34

Include administrative costs for the land acquisition process, the committee, consultation meeting, etc. Source: PMK No. 10/PMK.02/2016 – 4% of total compensation.

35Source: https://ptun-palu.go.id/prosedur-pengajuan-gugatan-dan-biaya-perkara/ – IDR 750,000 per AH.

'+#

#

#

XI. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION

A. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT

86. Executing Agency. MPWH (through the Directorate General for Water Resources) will be the executing agency (EA) for EARR. The EA established a Central Project Implementation Management Unit (CPMU) to consolidate activities and reporting from implementing agency (IA). The EA will be responsible for overall EARR implementation activities, including social safeguards.

87. Implementing Agency. The Project Management Unit (PMU) under the DGWR, will be the implementing agency (IA) with the S3RBO as the project implementing unit (PIU) for this subproject. As PIU, the S3RBO is responsible for the preparation of relevant social safeguard documents as well as their implementation andmonitoring.

88. Social Safeguards Consultant. The CPMU will be assisted by the Social Safeguard Specialist of the Project Management Consultant (PMC) in overall safeguards monitoring and reporting to ADB. The IA/S3RBO will be assisted by the Project Management and Supervision Consultant (PMSC) team, which will include a Social Safeguards Specialist. The social safeguards specialist under PMSC will (i). supporting the S3RBO for the day-to-day implementation and monitoring of safeguards plans, including implementation of the LRP, (ii) support the S3RBO Land Acquisition Team (LAT) in implementation of the negotiated land acquisition process, which will include facilitating consultations and disclosing information to affected communities and APs; and (iii) supporting the functioning of the grievance redress mechanism.

89. Sigi District Local Government trough their relevant institution/ agency will beresponsible to provide a livelihood restorartion programs to the vulnerable AHs.

90. S3RBO Land Acquisition Team. A land acquisition team will be established by the S3RBO for conducting the land acquisition process. The LAT will comprise members from relevant divisions at the S3RBO and representatives from the District or Provincial ATR/BPN, representatives of the respective of Subdistricts and Villages government. Village and subdistrict government would take significant role in organizing AHs/APs and community consultations, IOL and SES and delivery of livelihood restoration program. Provincial or District ATR/BPN will support land acquisition process and update of land ownership status.

91. Project contractor will be responsible for handling project impacts during construction including compensation for any damaged or lost assets set forth in the LARP. This obligation needs to be emphasized in the project contractor’s contract. The contractor will receive briefing on social safeguards or participate in social safeguard capacity building training.

B. CAPACITY BUILDING

92. The S3RBO have been working for on-going subproject under EARR loan. i.e Coastal Protection, applying ADB SPS and Law 2/2012. However, in order to realize the implementation of the social safeguards planning documents, the Social Safeguards Specialist under the PMC shall assist CPMU for the implementation, and provide the capacity building training on social safeguards-related tasks/activities. The capacity buiding training wiill be conducted to the S3RBO staff who will prepare and implement the social safeguards plan, the contractor as well as the relevant local

'!#

#

#

government staff in managing social safeguards. Specific topics recommended for the training are.

i. Strengthen knowledge and awareness of stakeholders on provisions in the social safeguards planning documents including ADB SPS 2009 on involuntary resettlement

ii. Involuntary resettlement principles as Indonesian legal framework and ADB’s SPS (2009). Project resettlement principles

iii. Meaningful consultations and grievance handling that shall pay attention to women and other vulnerable groups

iv. Orientation and finalization of detailed plans for livelihood restoration, plan for compensation disbursement and its required documentation, and required documentation for grievance handling.

v. Managing impacts during construction

vi. Gender issues and it strategy relevant to subproject

vii. Monitoring of resettlement development plan and reporting of compliance and achievement of social safeguards objectives (that AHs do not become worse off).

93. The S3RBO as PIU handling overall oversight for the project, shall retain adequate staff for handling social safeguards with relevant qualifications and experience to be able to adequately design and deliver the LARP.

#

''#

#

#

XII. LARP ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

94. Land acquisition implementation schedule below is based on consultation with S3RBO.

Table 30. Land Acquisition Implementation Schedule

No Step Time Line

A Planning Stage

1 Submission LARP to ADB for approval December 2020

2 ADB review and approval of LARP November-December 2020

3 Distribution of the project information booklet (PIB) to

APs and relevant stakeholders

December-January 2021

4 Disclosure of LARP on ADB and S3RBO website January 2021

B Implementation Stage (Land Acquisition)

1 Establishment of S3RBO Land Acquistion Team November 2020

2 Socialisation and consultation with land owners

regarding willingness to sell land

December 2020

3 Verification of land ownership data by S3RBO LAT with

involve ATR BPN Kab Sigi

January 2021

4 Valuation of compensation value by independent

appraisal

January-February 2021

5 Negotiations to get agreement on amount of

compensation for land and affected crops

February 2021

6 Payment of compensation March 2021

C Livelihood Restoration Program (LRP)

1 Implementation of LRP to address vulnerable affected

households

May 2021

D Monitoring and Evaluation

1 Semi-annual monitoring and reporting Semiannualy in parralel with

construction activity

#

# #

'"#

#

#

XIII. MONITORING AND REPORTING

A. Monitoring Arrangements

95. The objectives of monitoring are to assess (i) the implementation progress of the land acquisition and resettlement plan activities; and (ii) the outcome of the plan activities to income and livelihood of the affected persons.

96. Internal monitoring will be undertaken by CPMU, assisted by the PMC, throughout the land acquisition and resettlement process. Social Safeguards Specialist under PMSC will conduct the day to day monitoring on the implementation of LARP and support data required for monitoring. Semi-annual monitoring reports will be prepared during subproject implementation to report the progress of all activities in the LARP, including implementation of livelihood restoration programs. A semi-annual monitoring report template is provided in Appendix 11.

97. The scopes of monitoring include but not limited to:

a. The inventory of assets for the basis of resettlement plan. b. Payment of compensation to all APs. c. Delivery of income restoration and social support entitlements. d. Meaningful consultation principles and procedure and public information

dissemination e. Adherence to grievance procedures and outstanding issues requiring

management’s attention. f. Priority of APs regarding the options offered. g. Benefits provided from the project. h. Assess outcome and impacts of social safeguards activities on the income and

standards of living of APs.

98. The monitoring should be participatory, paying close attention to the indicators based on social safeguards. The monitoring result will be included in the project (EARR) semi-annual social safeguard monitoring report and posted on ADB and DGWR or S3RBO websites. Project social safeguard monitoring report will be submitted to ADB untill the loan closing. .

B. Internal Monitoring Indicators

99. Potential monitoring indicators from which sepcific indicators, can be developed and refined as applicable to the pertinent social safeguard planning document, as set out in the Table 31.

Table 31. Suggested Internal Monitoring Parameters and Indicators

Monitoring parameters

Suggested indicators

Consultation and Grievances

• Consultations organized as scheduled including meetings, groups, and community activities.

• Knowledge of entitlements by the APs (of women, men, and other vulnerable groups).

• Use of the grievance redress mechanism by the APs (of women, men, and other vulnerable groups).

• Information on the resolution of the grievances.

• Information on the implementation of the social preparation phase.

Communication and Participation

• Number of general meetings (for women, men, and other vulnerable groups).

• Percentage of women out of total participants.

'$#

#

#

Monitoring parameters

Suggested indicators

• Number of meetings exclusively with women.

• Number of meetings exclusively with vulnerable groups.

• Level of participation in meetings (of women, men, and other vulnerable groups).

• Level and adequacy of information communicated.

• Information disclosure.

• Translation of information disclosed in the local languages.Delivery of Entitlements

• Entitlements disbursed, compared with number and category of losses set out in the entitlement matrix.

• Disbursements against timelines.

• Identification of APs losing land temporarily, e.g. through soil disposal,

borrow pits, contractors’ camps, have been included.

• Restoration of social infrastructure and services.

• Progress on livelihood restoration activities being implemented as set out in

the livelihood restoration plan.

#

Budget and Time Frame

• Social safeguards staff appointed and mobilized on schedule for field and

office work.

• Capacity building and training activities completed on schedule.

• Achieving resettlement implementation activities against the agreed

implementation plan.

• Funds disbursement according to the LARP

• Land acquisition and occupation in time for implementation.

Livelihood and Income Restoration

• Number of APs under the rehabilitation programs (women, men, and

vulnerable groups).

• Number of APs who received vocational training (women, men, and

vulnerable groups).

• Types of training and number of participants in each program.

• Number and percentage of APs covered under livelihood programs (women, men, and vulnerable groups).

• Number of APs who have restored their income and livelihood patterns

(women, men, and vulnerable groups).

• Degree of satisfaction with support received for livelihood programs.

• Percentage of APs who improved their income (women, men, and vulnerable

groups)

• Percentage of APs who improved their standard of living (women, men, and

vulnerable groups)

Benefit Monitoring • Noticeable changes in patterns of occupation, production, and resource use

compared to the pre-project situation.

• Noticeable changes in income and expenditure patterns compared to the

pre-project situation.

• Changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project situation.

• Changes in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards.

#

!

"#!

!

AP

PE

ND

IX 1

. P

RO

JE

CT

MA

P

•K

ey

Ma

p o

f T

ran

sm

iss

ion

Pip

eli

ne

Pla

n

!

"$!

!

!

"%!

!

•L

ay

ou

t o

f P

an

ek

i R

aw

Wa

ter

Tra

ns

mis

sio

n P

ipe

lin

e P

lan

!

&'!

!AP

PE

ND

IX 2

. P

LO

T O

F L

AN

D M

AP

!

&(!

!

!

&)!

!

!

&*!

!

!

&+!

!

!

&"!

!

!

&&!

!

!

&#!

!

!

&$!

!

!

&%!

!

!

#'!

!

!

#(!

!

!

#)!

!

!

#*!

!

!

#+!

!

!

#"!

!

!

#&!

!

!

##!

!

!

#$!

!

!

#%!

!

!

$'!

!

!

$(!

!

!

$)!

!

!

$*!

!

!

$+!

!

!

$"!

!

!

$&!

!

!

$#!

!

!

$$!

!

!

$%!

!

!

%'!

!

!

%(!

!

!

%)!

!

!

%*!

!

!

%+!

!

!

%"!

!

!

%&!

!

!

%#!

!

!

%$!

!

!

%%!

!

!

(''!

!

!

"#"!

!

APPENDIX 3. QUESTIONNAIRE

!

"#$!

!

!

"#%!

!

!

"#&!

!

!

"#'!

!

!

"#(!

!

!

"#)!

!

!

"#*!

!

!

"#+!

!

!

""#!

!

!

"""!

!

!

""$!

!

!

""%!

!

!

""&!

!

!

""'!

!

!

""(!

!

!

"")!

!

!

""*!

!

!

""+!

!

APPENDIX 4. LETTER OF MARKET PRICE ESTIMATION FOR LAND AND PLANTS

• Letter of Land Price Estimation for Loru Village

!

"$#!

!

• Letter of Plant Price Estimation for Loru Village

!

"$"!

!

• Letter of Land Price Estimation for Pombewe Village

!

"$$!

!

• Letter of Plant Price Estimation for Pombewe Village

!

"$%!

!

APPENDIX 5. DRAFT OF PROJECT INFORMATION BOOKLET (PIB)

Paneki Raw Water Supply Systemm

Project Description

Paneki Raw Water Supply System/Paneki RWSS) is a part of PASIGALA RWSS inEmergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (EARR). Thesubproject components include weir with intake structure (16 m), transmission pipeline and access for material distribution (1.6 km). The subproject requires 4.395 km transmission pipe with diameter is 250 mm. Paneki RWSS priority connection is in Huntap Pombewe (Pombewe Permanent Residence), Loru and Pombewe Village in Sigi Biromaru Subdistrict. According to the DGHS standards, Paneki WTP 25 liters/second can provide water up to 2,500 HHs.

Location

The subproject will pass through 2

villages (Loru and Pombewe) in Sigi

Biromaru Subdistrict, Sigi District.

Scope of Resettlement Impact

The subproject will require 27,217.5 m2

(consist of 41 parcels of land). The

required lands are owned by 34 AHs (40

parcels) and 1 plot of land in the form of

river bank belongs to the government.

Consultation on 27 June 2020 in the area

nearby Paneki Intake

FGD on 15 July 2020

PROJECT INFORMATION BOOKLET

"$&!

Project Resettlement Principles

(i) Avoid involuntary resettlement as much as possible. If this is not possible, impactsshall be minimized by exploring project and design alternatives. Efforts to minimizeresettlement impact will be continued during implementation.

(ii) Screen sub-project components during feasibility study or before preparation ofresettlement plan to identify involuntary resettlement impacts and risks and thelikelihood of impacts per subproject activity.

(iii) Carry out culturally appropriate and gender-sensitive social impact assessments (SIA)to assess potential impacts on APs particularly with affected vulnerable groups.

(iv) Conduct meaningful consultations with affected APs, stakeholders, concerned NGOs,and community groups to solicit their participation across land acquisition andinvoluntary resettlement process and monitoring. Inform APs on the land acquisition andinvoluntary resettlement process, their entitlements, and compensation and assistanceoptions. Pay attention to the need of vulnerable groups, especially those below thepoverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, and those without legal titleto land and ensure their participation in consultations.

(v) Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate the affectedpersons’ concerns

(vi) Improve or at least restore the livelihood of the APs through (a) land-based incomeand livelihood program; (b) replacement of assets with equal or higher value; (c)compensation at full replacement cost for lost assets; and (d) additional assistancethrough benefit sharing where possible.

(vii) Assist and compensate APs without title or any recognizable legal rights to land fornon-land assets at replacement cost.

(viii) Pay compensation for lost land and non-land assets prior to physical or economicdisplacement. Civil works will not commence until APs are fully compensated, andother entitlements take place.

(ix) Disclose the LARP document and its updates, if required to the APs and otherstakeholders in an accessible place and a form and understandable language. TheLARP will be disclosed on project and ADB’s website.

(x) Negotiated land acquisition will follow procedure in a transparent, consistent, andequitable manner principles and be confirmed trough written record and verified by anindependent third party.

(xi) Monitor implementation of the resettlement planning and resettlement outcomes andimpacts on the standards of living of APs. Disclose the monitoring reports on theproject’s website and make it available on the project office;

(xii) The EA will ensure that no physical displacement or economic displacement occur until(i) compensation at full replacement cost has been paid to each AP for subprojectcomponents that are ready to be constructed; (ii) other entitlements listed in theentitlement matrix have been provided to the APs; and (iii) livelihood restorationprogram is in place to help APs improve, or at least restore, their incomes andlivelihoods.

Inventory of Losses and Socialization with land owners

!

"#$!

!En

titl

em

en

t M

atr

ix

No

Imp

ac

t/L

os

sC

ate

go

ryE

nti

tle

d P

ers

on

Pro

jec

t e

nti

tle

me

nt

Re

ma

rks

A

La

nd

Lo

ss

1

Lo

ss o

f la

nd

, in

clu

din

g

ag

ricu

ltu

ral a

nd

re

sid

en

tia

l la

nd

Th

ose

wh

o h

ave

fo

rma

l le

ga

l ri

gh

ts (

ce

rtific

ate

) o

r th

ose

w

ho

se

cla

im

ove

r th

ela

nd

is r

eco

gn

ize

d a

s a

fu

ll title

in

clu

din

g

pe

rso

ns o

ccu

pyin

g t

he

sta

te la

nd

in

go

od

fa

ith

•C

ash

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n a

t re

pla

ce

me

nt

co

st

an

d r

efle

ctive

o

f fa

ir

ma

rke

t va

lue

a

t th

e

tim

e

of

pa

ym

en

t o

f co

mp

en

sa

tio

n;

or

lan

d

rep

lace

me

nt

with

a

t le

ast

sim

ilar

att

rib

ute

s t

o t

he

acq

uir

ed

la

nd

in

te

rm o

f va

lue

, p

rod

uctivity,

loca

tio

n,

an

d

titlin

g.

An

y

taxe

s

an

d

tra

nsa

ctio

na

l co

st

bo

rne

by t

he

pro

ject.

•F

ina

ncia

l a

ssis

tan

ce

fo

r th

e

ren

ew

al

of

the

la

nd

o

wn

ers

hip

do

cu

me

nts

(ce

rtific

ate

or

lan

d d

ocu

me

nts

re

co

gn

ize

d a

s fu

ll title

) fo

r th

e re

sid

ua

l a

rea

o

f th

e

en

title

d p

ers

on

s' l

an

d.

•If

th

e r

em

ain

ing

aff

ecte

d l

an

d c

an

’t b

e f

un

ctio

ne

d f

or

the

sp

ecific

use

an

d u

tiliz

atio

n,

the

en

title

d p

art

y c

an

a

sk

for

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

for

the

ir

en

tire

lan

d

at

rep

lace

me

nt

co

st

•V

alu

atio

n

of

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

co

nd

ucte

d

by

a

lice

nse

d

ind

ep

en

de

nt

ap

pra

ise

r.

It

will

b

e

use

d

for

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

pa

ym

en

t b

y

the

L

an

d

Acq

uis

itio

n

Imp

lem

en

tin

g

Te

am

•F

or

the

n

eg

otia

ted

la

nd

a

cq

uis

itio

n,

in

ca

se

th

ere

is

d

ed

uctio

n

of

tax

as

pe

r g

ove

rnm

en

t’s

req

uir

em

en

ts,

the

a

mo

un

t o

f th

e

tax

va

lue

a

nd

th

e

de

du

ctio

n

sh

ou

ld

be

cle

arl

y

co

nsu

lte

d

with

a

nd

a

gre

ed

by t

he

AP

sB

L

os

s o

f C

rop

s a

nd

Tre

es

1

Lo

ss o

f C

rop

s a

nd

T

ree

sO

wn

ers

, re

ga

rdle

ss

of

land

te

nu

re s

tatu

s (

with

ce

rtific

ate

or

reco

gn

iza

ble

ri

gh

ts,

info

rma

l d

we

llers

,o

ccu

pa

nts

).

•A

nn

ua

l cro

ps:

ca

sh

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n w

ill b

e p

aid

ba

se

d

on

pre

va

ilin

g m

ark

et

rate

s.

•P

ere

nn

ial

cro

ps:

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

at

rep

lace

me

nt

co

st

takin

g in

to a

cco

un

t th

eir

pro

du

ctivity a

nd

ag

e.

•T

imb

ers

/tre

es:

co

mp

en

sa

tio

n

at

cu

rre

nt

ma

rke

t ra

te

ba

se

d o

n a

ge

, ty

pe

of

tre

es a

nd

dia

me

ter

of

tru

nk a

t b

rea

st

he

igh

t.

•V

alu

atio

n

of

cro

ps

will

b

e

de

term

ine

d

by

ind

ep

en

de

nt

ap

pra

ise

r.

•9

0 d

ays a

dva

nce

no

tice

be

fore

h

arv

estin

g/la

nd

cle

ari

ng

.

C

Te

mp

ora

ry o

r P

erm

an

en

tIm

pac

ts o

n N

on

-la

nd

As

se

ts d

uri

ng

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

1

Te

mp

ora

ry o

r p

erm

an

en

t im

pa

cts

d

ue

to

co

nstr

uctio

n

activitie

s

Fo

r th

ose

w

ho

h

ave

fo

rma

l le

ga

l ri

gh

ts

(ce

rtific

ate

) o

r th

ose

w

ho

se

cla

im o

n l

an

d i

s

reco

gn

ize

d

as

a

full

rig

ht

•F

or

lea

se

p

aym

en

ts

of

the

a

ffe

cte

d

lan

d

by

the

co

ntr

acto

r b

ase

d

on

th

e

ap

plic

ab

le

ren

tal

fee

s

an

d

ag

ree

me

nts

with

la

nd

ow

ne

rs.

•F

or

tem

po

rary

im

pa

ct

on

pro

du

ctive

la

nd

, th

e A

H m

ay

ch

oo

se

: (1

) co

st

of

the

re

nta

l va

lue

d t

o b

e n

ot

less

tha

n

the

n

et

inco

me

th

at

will

b

e

ge

ne

rate

d

fro

m

pro

du

ctive

a

ffe

cte

d la

nd

; (2

) C

om

pe

nsa

tio

n fo

r n

on

-la

nd

a

sse

tsacquired

(tre

es/p

lants

, str

uctu

re)

perm

anently

affecte

d

will

be

com

pensate

d

at

•3

0-6

0

da

ys

pri

or

no

tice

g

ive

n

to t

he

ow

ne

r o

f th

e l

an

d b

efo

re

it

is

use

d

tem

po

rari

ly

by

co

ntr

acto

rs.

•T

his

p

rovis

ion

sh

ou

ld

be

stip

ula

ted

in

th

e

co

ntr

act/

ag

ree

me

nt

with

civ

il w

ork

s C

on

tra

cto

rs

!

"#%!

!No

Imp

ac

t/L

os

sC

ate

go

ryE

nti

tle

d P

ers

on

Pro

jec

t e

nti

tle

me

nt

Re

ma

rks

repla

cem

ent cost.

•L

an

d w

ill b

e r

esto

red

to

pre

-pro

ject

co

nd

itio

ns o

r e

ve

n

be

tte

r a

fte

rth

e c

onstr

uctio

n is

com

ple

ted

Th

ose

w

ho

d

o

no

t h

ave

le

ga

l ri

gh

ts

an

d

en

title

me

nts

th

at

ca

n

be

re

co

gn

ize

d

as

full

ow

ne

rsh

ip

•T

he

re

is

no

la

nd

re

nta

l co

sts

d

uri

ng

th

e

pe

rio

d

of

imp

act

La

nd

w

ill

be

re

sto

red

a

s

it

wa

s

be

fore

th

e

pro

ject,

or

eve

n b

ette

r.

D

Oth

er

Ap

pra

isa

ble

Lo

ss

1

Tra

nsa

ctio

n C

ost

Th

e e

ntitled

pa

rty w

ho

lo

st

land

and

no

n-l

an

d

asse

ts

• A

llow

an

ce

to

co

ve

r a

dm

inis

tra

tio

n

cost,

re

ne

wa

l o

f la

nd

ow

ne

rship

fo

r re

sid

ua

l la

nd

, acqu

ired

La

nd

•V

alu

atio

n w

ill b

e d

ete

rmin

ed b

y

independent appra

iser.

2

Com

pensatio

n for

the w

aiti

ng p

eriods

(inte

rest)

The

part

y

entit

led

to

receiv

e

com

pensatio

n

for

late

paym

ent

•C

ash

com

pensatio

n

based

on

the

risk-f

ree

inte

rest,

govern

ment bank in

tere

st

•V

alu

atio

n w

ill b

e d

ete

rmin

ed b

y

independent appra

iser.

3

Loss o

f re

sid

ual

Land

Those w

ho h

ave f

orm

al

legal

rights

(c

ert

ificate

) or

those

who

make

cla

im

on

land

and

recogniz

ed

as

legiti

mate

ow

ners

in

clu

din

g

those

who

occupy

sta

te

land

in

good faith

•If th

ere

are

no re

sid

ual

land th

at

can be used fo

r a

purp

ose,

the

entit

led

part

y

is

entit

led

to

receiv

e

com

pensatio

n for

the e

ntir

e la

nd a

t re

pla

cem

ent cost.

•R

efe

r to

th

e

Land

Law

N

o.

2

com

pensatio

n

for

the

entir

e

land

only

giv

en

if th

e

entit

led

part

ies

rais

ed

their

obje

ctio

n/a

skin

g.

4

Loss o

f re

sourc

e b

ase

(hig

h r

isk o

f im

poverishm

ent)

Entit

led

Part

y

who

loses

10%

or

more

of

tota

l assets

or

earn

ing

revenue

sourc

es;

Entit

led P

art

y,

poor

and

vuln

era

ble

, re

gard

less

of

the

severity

of

the

impact

•P

art

icip

ate

in li

velih

ood r

esto

ratio

n p

rogra

m (

LR

P)

•G

iven

the

opport

unity

to

get

a

job

rela

ted

with

th

e

Pro

ject

•LR

P

inclu

des

agricultu

ral

support

, pro

vis

ion

of

train

ing,

job

pla

cem

ent,

additi

onal

financia

l gra

nts

and m

icro

loans

for

equip

ment

and b

uild

ings,

as

well

as

org

aniz

atio

nal

support

/logis

tics

to

esta

blis

h

alte

rnativ

e

incom

e

genera

ting

activ

ities

for

affecte

d

popula

tions.

•LR

P

will

be

inte

gra

ted

with

Local

govern

ment

socia

l pro

gra

ms w

here

th

e pro

ject

is

locate

d

!

"#$!

Grievance Redress Mechanism

1. Step Process Timeline

A. Grievance related to Inventory of affected assets and compensation

2. 1 In the case of the AP objected to the result of inventory and identification of affected assets/land acquisition objects, the aggrieved AP may file the objection/grievance through community leader or head of village who will send the complaint to S3RBO LAT or send directly to the S3RBO LAT.

within 14 working days since the announcement of the inventory result.

4. 2 If the grievance is accepted, the S3RBO LAT shall verify and revise the land maps and/or nominative list.

Verification and revision shall be made no later than 14 working days since the receipt of the grievance.

5. 3 In case of different calculation of inventory and identification results and verification, the revision shall be set out into an inventory and identification revised report

6. 4 If the grievance on inventory and identification results are not accepted, the S3RBO LAT shall prepare a rejection report and inform to the agrieved AP, includes reason of the rejection.

B. Grievance related to compensation

7. 1 In case there is no agreement on the form and/or amount of compensation, an aggrieved AP may bring the grievance/complaint directly to S3RBO LAT or trough community leader or head of village who will submit it to S3RBO LAT.

8. 2 The S3RBO together with the Community Leader and or Village leader will attempt to seek consensus to achieve an acceptable settlement with the aggrieved AP/AH.

within 30 working days to come into agreement with aggrieved AP/AH on the level of compensation for affected assets.

9. 3 In the case of the negotiation did not reach agreement and aggrieved AP/AH refused to sell the land, S3RBO LAT will inform to the project to find another land and make necessary realignment of the transmission pipeline or weir with intake location.

C. Grievance related to other aspects of the project

10. 1 An aggrieved AP may bring any complaint either directly to project staff, contractor, community leader or village head who will bring the complaint/grievance to theproject staff in the field office or subproject office to seek resolution. Project land acquisition and safeguard unit will send the grievance record to the subproject management.

11. 2 Subproject manager will examine the complaint and will deliver the decision to the complainant. Project staff will facilitate communication between the complainant and the project management in redressing the grievance. Project staff will document the objection and resolution

within the 15 working days will deliver the decision to the complainant

3 If the aggrieved entitled partiy is not satisfied with the decision or handling of the complaint, he/she may bring the grievance, either in writing or verbally to the Mayor.

within a period of 14 days from the issuance of the decision.

4 The Mayor will decide on the complaint by requesting for opinions from (i). The aggrieved enttled party, (ii). S3RBO, (iii) other relevant stakeholders.

within a period of 30 days .

12. 5 If the aggrieved AP is not satisfied with the action taken by Mayor on the complaint, she/he may file the complaint to the court for final adjudication.

!

"#%!

Contact for Paneki RWSS: Balai Wilayah Sungai Sulawesi-3 (BWSS-3)

Jl. DR. Abdurrahman Saleh No.230, Birobuli Utara,

Kec. Palu Sel., Kota Palu, Sulawesi Tengah 94111

Telp: 0451 482147

!

"#&!

APPENDIX 6. COST ESTIMATION FOR AFFECTED LAND

Loru Village

No Boundary Stakes AHsAffected Land

Cost Estimation (IDR)Size (m) Total Area (m²)

1 JP 144 - JP 140 Bpk. Alm Roti 100 x 24 2400 120,000,000

2 JP 140 - JP 134 Bpk. Jasrun - 1012.5 50,625,000

3 JP 134 - JP 128 Bpk. Kadir 163 x 6 978 48,900,000

4 JP 128 - JP 121 Bpk. Andi 165 x 6 990 49,500,000

5 JP 121 - JP 119 Bpk. Sudin 72 x 6 432 21,600,000

6 JP 119 - JP 118 Bpk. Aedin 36 x 6 216 10,800,000

Total Luas lahan 6,028.5 301,425,000

Pombewe Village

No Boundary Stakes AHs

Affected Land

Cost Estimation (IDR)Size (m)

Total Area (m²)

1 JP 118 - JP 117 Ibu. Sanaira 6 x 25 150 7,500,000

2 JP117 - JP 112 Bapak. Anwar/Harnyah 6 x 129.58 774.48 38,724,000

3 JP 112 - JP 109 bpk.bunian 6 x 70.42 422.52 21,126,000

4 JP 109 - JP 105 Bapak. Atman 6 x 100 600 30,000,000

5 JP 105 - JP 103 Bapak Aedin 6 x 50 300 15,000,000

6 JP 103 - JP 95 Ibu Sanaira 6 x 222.3 1333.8 66,690,000

7 JP 95 - JP 90 Bpk. Sarman/Aco 6 x 102.7 616.2 30,810,000

8 JP 90 - JP 86 Bpk. Suisdin 6 x 108 648 32,400,000

9 JP 86 - JP 81 Bpk Hajudin 6 x 117 702 35,100,000

10 JP 81 - JP 78 Bpk. Ansar/Satriani/Ikhsan

6 x 81 486 24,300,000

11 JP. 78 - JP 73 Bpk. Sarman/Aco 6 x 123.6 741.6 37,080,000

12 JP 73 - JP 71Bpk. Ahlan/Nur Aisyah/Herman

6 x 45.4 272.4 13,620,000

13 JP 71 - JP 67 Sempadan Sungai 6 x 100 600 -

14 JP 67 - JP 63 Bpk. Andi Muyu/Arfan 6 x 94.2 565.2 28,260,000

15 JP 63 - JP 63 Bpk Herman 6 x 15.8 94.8 4,740,000

16 JP. 63 - JJP 58 Bpk. Ahlan/Nur Aisyah/Herman

6 x 108.5 651 32,550,000

17 JP. 58 - JP 57 Bpk Anton 6 x 21.10 126.6 6,330,000

18 JP. 57 - JP 57 Bpk. Jahir 6 x 19.4 116.4 5,820,000

19 JP. 57 - JP 54 Bpk. Imanuel 6 x 76 456 22,800,000

20 JP 54 - JP 50 Bpk. Sarman/Aco 6 x 90 540 27,000,000

21 JP 50 - JP 48 Ibu Simina 6 x 50 300 15,000,000

22 JP 48 - JP 41 Bpk. Ahmad 6 x 184 1104 55,200,000

23 JP 41 - JP 36 Ibu Umi/minalti 6 x 116 696 34,800,000

24 JP 36 - JP 35 Bpk. Jemi 6 x 25 150 7,500,000

25 JP 35 - JP 32 Bpk. Badi/fitri 6 x 90 540 27,000,000

26 JP 32 - JP 31 Ibu Mini 6 x 10 60 3,000,000

27 JP 31 - JP 29Bpk. Rahim/Nartaman/Yuria

6 x 37 222 11,100,000

28 JP 29- JP 27 Ibu Ramlah/Halifah 6 x 63 378 18,900,000

29 JP 27 - JP 22 Bpk. Jakir 6 x 125 750 37,500,000

30 JP 22 - JP 19 Bpk. Basri 6 x 75 450 22,500,000

31 JP 19 - JP 3 Bpk. Usman 6 x 411 2466 123,300,000

32 JP 3 - JP 05 Bpk. Atman 6 x 184 1104 55,200,000

33 JP 05 - S8 Bpk. Masmun/Halifah 6 x 156 936 46,800,000

!

"'(!

No Boundary Stakes AHs

Affected Land

Cost Estimation (IDR)Size (m)

Total Area (m²)

34 S8 - S11 Bpk. Ambas 6 x 176 1056 52,800,000

35 S11 - S14 Bpk. Riswan 6 x 115 690 34,500,000

21,099 1,024,950,000

Total 27,127.5 1,326,375,000

!

"#"!

!AP

PE

ND

IX 7

. C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TIO

N F

OR

AF

FE

CT

ED

PL

AN

TS

/TR

EE

S

Lo

ru V

illa

ge

No

Bo

un

da

ry

Sta

ke

sA

Hs

Aff

ec

ted

A

rea

(m²)

Ca

teg

ory

of

Tre

es

/Pla

nts

Es

tim

ate

d C

os

t(I

DR

)A

mo

un

t (I

DR

)T

ota

l (I

DR

)

Na

me

of

Tre

eS

ma

llB

igP

rod

uc

-ti

ve

Sm

all

Big

Pro

du

cti

ve

1

JP

14

4-

JP

1

40

Bp

k.

Alm

R

oti

24

00

Co

kla

t5

4

2

50

,00

0

13

,50

0,0

00

2

5,0

35

,00

0

Ke

mir

i4

15

0,0

00

6

00

,00

0

Ja

ti2

5

00

,00

0

1,0

00

,00

0

1

35

,00

0

35

,00

0

Ko

pi

3

25

0,0

00

7

50

,00

0

Be

limb

ing

4

15

0,0

00

6

00

,00

0

Ke

lap

a6

1

,00

0,0

00

6

,00

0,0

00

A

sa

m1

5

00

,00

0

50

0,0

00

A

ren

1

30

0,0

00

3

00

,00

0

Ma

ng

ga

3

30

0,0

00

9

00

,00

0

La

ng

sa

t1

3

00

,00

0

30

0,0

00

Su

ku

n1

3

00

,00

0

30

0,0

00

Ka

yu

Ba

lari

o1

25

0,0

00

2

50

,00

0

2

JP

14

0-

JP

13

4B

pk.

Ja

sru

n1

01

2.5

Le

ka

tu8

2

0,0

00

1

60

,00

0

16

,91

5,0

00

Co

kla

t4

9

2

50

,00

0

12

,25

0,0

00

Are

n

1

30

0,0

00

3

00

,00

0

Ke

mir

i5

3

0,0

00

1

50

,00

0

8

1

50

,00

0

1

,20

0,0

00

Ja

ti1

3

3

5,0

00

4

55

,00

0

Ka

yu

Ba

lari

o1

25

0,0

00

25

0,0

00

Ke

lap

a2

1

,00

0,0

00

2

,00

0,0

00

Ke

lor

2

75

,00

0

15

0,0

00

3

JP

13

4 -

JP

B

pk.

Ka

dir

97

8B

am

bu

5

15

0,0

00

7

50

,00

0

1,1

50

,00

0

!

"#$!

!No

Bo

un

da

ry

Sta

ke

sA

Hs

Aff

ec

ted

A

rea

(m²)

Ca

teg

ory

of

Tre

es

/Pla

nts

Es

tim

ate

d C

os

t(I

DR

)A

mo

un

t (I

DR

)T

ota

l (I

DR

)

Na

me

of

Tre

eS

ma

llB

igP

rod

uc

-ti

ve

Sm

all

Big

Pro

du

cti

ve

12

8G

ers

en

4

1

00

,00

0

4

00

,00

0

4

JP

12

8 -

JP

1

21

Bp

k.

An

di

99

0C

okla

t7

2

50

,00

0

1,7

50

,00

0

6,1

35

,00

0

14

50

,00

0

70

0,0

00

Wa

ru4

2

00

,00

0

80

0,0

00

Ra

mb

uta

n1

1

50

,00

0

15

0,0

00

Ke

mir

i1

15

0,0

00

15

0,0

00

La

mto

ro1

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

4

1

0,0

00

4

0,0

00

Sa

ha

ng

1

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

Ka

yu

Ba

lari

o4

25

0,0

00

1,0

00

,00

0

5

2

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

Be

nd

o1

2

00

,00

0

2

00

,00

0

Po

ho

n A

ga

4

1

00

,00

0

4

00

,00

0

3

1

5,0

00

4

5,0

00

Ba

u3

1

50

,00

0

4

50

,00

0

3

50

,00

0

15

0,0

00

5

JP

12

1 -

JP

1

19

Bp

k.

Su

din

43

2K

ela

pa

1

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

5

,85

0,0

00

Co

kla

t2

3

2

50

,00

0

5,7

50

,00

0

6

JP

11

9 -

JP

1

18

Bp

k.

Ae

din

21

6A

ga

4

15

,00

0

60

,00

0

2,1

60

,00

0

Ke

lap

a

1

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

Co

kla

t8

2

50

,00

0

2,0

00

,00

0

To

tal

6,0

28

.50

62

31

18

0

5

7,2

45

,00

0

!

"##!

!Po

mb

ew

e V

illa

ge

No

Bo

un

da

ry

Sta

ke

sA

Hs

Aff

ec

ted

A

rea

(m²)

Ca

teg

ory

of

Tre

es

/Pla

nts

Es

tim

ate

d B

ud

ge

t (I

DR

)A

mo

un

t (I

DR

)T

ota

l (I

DR

)

Na

me

of

Tre

eS

ma

llB

igP

rod

uc

- ti

ve

Sm

all

Big

Pro

du

cti

ve

1

JP

11

8 -

JP

11

7Ib

u.

Sa

na

ira

15

0A

ga

5

1

00

,00

0

5

00

,00

0

63

0,0

00

Aw

ar

- a

wa

r2

1

5,0

00

30

,00

0

Se

ma

k

be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

2

JP

11

7-

JP

11

2

Bp

k.

An

wa

r/H

arn

ya

h7

74

.48

K

op

i1

2

5,0

00

2

5,0

00

1

,70

2,5

00

En

au

1

3

00

,00

0

30

0,0

00

Se

ma

k

be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

Wa

ru

1

20

0,0

00

2

00

,00

0

2

50

,00

0

10

0,0

00

Ag

a1

1

5,0

00

1

5,0

00

Aw

ar

- a

wa

r

2

5

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

Ke

lor

5

15

,00

0

75

,00

0

Sir

sa

k

1

7

5,0

00

7

5,0

00

1

7,5

00

7

,50

0

Ke

lap

a

2

10

0,0

00

2

00

,00

0

Je

ruk P

uru

t

1

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

2

20

,00

0

40

,00

0

Aw

ar

-aw

ar

1

5

0,0

00

50

,00

0

1

1

5,0

00

1

5,0

00

Ag

a

3

10

0,0

00

30

0,0

00

3

JP

11

2-

JP

10

9B

pk.

Bu

nia

n4

22

.52

W

aru

1

2

00

,00

0

20

0,0

00

8

50

,00

0

3

5

0,0

00

1

50

,00

0

Se

ma

k

be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

!

"#%!

!No

Bo

un

da

ry

Sta

ke

sA

Hs

Aff

ec

ted

A

rea

(m²)

Ca

teg

ory

of

Tre

es

/Pla

nts

Es

tim

ate

d B

ud

ge

t (I

DR

)A

mo

un

t (I

DR

)T

ota

l (I

DR

)

Na

me

of

Tre

eS

ma

llB

igP

rod

uc

- ti

ve

Sm

all

Big

Pro

du

cti

ve

Ru

mp

un

b

am

bu

1

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

Ka

yu

B

ala

rio

1

25

0,0

00

2

50

,00

0

Ma

ng

ga

1

50

,00

0

50

,00

0

4

JP

10

9 -

JP

10

5B

pk.

Atm

an

6

00

Ma

ng

ga

2

30

0,0

00

6

00

,00

0

8,0

00

,00

0

Ke

mir

i

1

1

50

,00

0

15

0,0

00

1

15

0,0

00

1

50

,00

0

Ke

lap

a

6

1,0

00

,00

0

6,0

00

,00

0

Co

kla

t

2

2

50

,00

0

50

0,0

00

Ko

pi

2

25

0,0

00

5

00

,00

0

se

ma

k

be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

5

JP

10

5 -

JP

10

3B

pk.

Ae

din

30

0C

okla

t

1

2

2

50

,00

0

3,0

00

,00

0

7,3

00

,00

0

Ag

a

1

10

0,0

00

10

0,0

00

Du

ria

n

1

7

50

,00

0

75

0,0

00

1

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

Ru

mp

un

B

am

bu

1

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

Du

ria

n

2

7

50

,00

0

1,5

00

,00

0

Co

kla

t

7

25

0,0

00

1

,75

0,0

00

6

JP

10

3 -

JP

95

Ib

u S

an

air

a1

,33

3.8

1

5

0,0

00

50

,00

0

8,8

42

,50

0

Ru

mp

un

b

am

bu

2

10

0,0

00

2

00

,00

0

En

au

1

3

00

,00

0

30

0,0

00

Ag

a1

1

5,0

00

1

5,0

00

Su

le

1

10

0,0

00

10

0,0

00

Ke

lap

a

7

1,0

00

,00

0

7,0

00

,00

0

!

"#&!

!No

Bo

un

da

ry

Sta

ke

sA

Hs

Aff

ec

ted

A

rea

(m²)

Ca

teg

ory

of

Tre

es

/Pla

nts

Es

tim

ate

d B

ud

ge

t (I

DR

)A

mo

un

t (I

DR

)T

ota

l (I

DR

)

Na

me

of

Tre

eS

ma

llB

igP

rod

uc

- ti

ve

Sm

all

Big

Pro

du

cti

ve

Ma

ng

ga

2

30

0,0

00

6

00

,00

0

Su

ku

n1

7

5,0

00

7

5,0

00

So

mp

o1

1

0,0

00

1

0,0

00

Pa

lem

1

10

,00

0

10

,00

0

Sir

sa

k

1

75

,00

0

75

,00

0

1

7,5

00

7

,50

0

Ma

ng

ga

1

3

00

,00

0

30

0,0

00

2

50

,00

0

10

0,0

00

7

JP

95

-

JP

90

Bp

k.

Sa

rma

n/A

co

61

6.2

Ja

ti

2

25

0,0

00

50

0,0

00

9

95

,00

0

Mb

osi

1

25

,00

0

25

,00

0

Ke

mir

i

3

1

50

,00

0

45

0,0

00

Su

le2

10

,00

0

2

0,0

00

8

JP

90

-

JP

86

B

pk.

Su

isd

in6

48

Ru

mp

un

B

am

bu

1

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

4,6

50

,00

0

Ng

aru

1

1

50

,00

0

1

50

,00

0

Ja

ti

3

25

0,0

00

7

50

,00

0

Co

kla

t

1

1

2

50

,00

0

2,7

50

,00

0

Ma

ng

ga

3

30

0,0

00

9

00

,00

0

9

JP

86

-

JP

81

Bp

k H

aju

din

70

21

50

,00

0

50

,00

0

7,5

00

,00

0

Ja

ti

10

25

0,0

00

2,5

00

,00

0

Co

kla

t

1

6

2

50

,00

0

4,0

00

,00

0

1

5

0,0

00

5

0,0

00

Ma

ng

ga

3

30

0,0

00

9

00

,00

0

10

JP

81

-

JP

78

B

pk.

An

sa

r/S

atr

ian

i/Ik

hsa

n

48

6K

ela

pa

4

1

,00

0,0

00

4

,00

0,0

00

4

,46

5,0

00

Pa

lem

1

50

,00

0

5

0,0

00

Ja

mb

u

1

15

,00

0

15

,00

0

!

"#'!

!No

Bo

un

da

ry

Sta

ke

sA

Hs

Aff

ec

ted

A

rea

(m²)

Ca

teg

ory

of

Tre

es

/Pla

nts

Es

tim

ate

d B

ud

ge

t (I

DR

)A

mo

un

t (I

DR

)T

ota

l (I

DR

)

Na

me

of

Tre

eS

ma

llB

igP

rod

uc

- ti

ve

Sm

all

Big

Pro

du

cti

ve

Mo

ye

t

Ke

mir

i

2

15

0,0

00

30

0,0

00

Ru

mp

un

b

am

bu

1

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

11

JP

78

-

JP

73

Bp

k.

Sa

rma

n/A

co

74

1.6

Ja

ti

2

25

0,0

00

50

0,0

00

7

20

,00

0

Se

ma

k

be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

Je

ruk P

uru

t

1

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

1

20

,00

0

20

,00

0

12

JP

73

-

JP

71

Bp

k.

Ah

lan

/Nu

r A

isya

h/H

erm

an

27

2.4

S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

13

JP

71

-

JP

67

Se

mp

ad

an

S

un

ga

i6

00

14

JP

67

-

JP

63

B

pk.

An

di

Mu

yu

/Arf

an

56

5.2

Ja

ti

2

25

0,0

00

50

0,0

00

7

70

,00

0

Na

ng

ka

1

15

0,0

00

1

50

,00

0

1

2

0,0

00

2

0,0

00

Ke

lap

a

1

10

0,0

00

1

00

,00

0

15

JP

63

-

JP

63

B

pk.

He

rma

n9

4.8

S

em

ak

be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

16

JP

63

-

JP

58

Bp

k.

Ah

lan

/Nu

r A

isya

h/H

erm

an

65

1S

em

ak

be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

17

JP

58

-

JP

57

B

pk.

An

ton

12

6.6

S

em

ak

be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

18

JP

57

-

JP

57

Bp

k.

Ja

hir

11

6.4

K

em

iri

1

1

50

,00

0

1

50

,00

0

15

0,0

00

19

JP

57

-

JP

54

Bp

k.

Ima

nu

el

45

6Ja

ti

4

25

0,0

00

1,0

00

,00

0

1,0

00

,00

0

20

JP

54

-

P 5

0B

pk.

Sa

rma

n/A

co

54

0S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

21

JP

50

-

JP

48

Ibu

Sim

ina

30

0S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

25

0,0

00

!

"#(!

!No

Bo

un

da

ry

Sta

ke

sA

Hs

Aff

ec

ted

A

rea

(m²)

Ca

teg

ory

of

Tre

es

/Pla

nts

Es

tim

ate

d B

ud

ge

t (I

DR

)A

mo

un

t (I

DR

)T

ota

l (I

DR

)

Na

me

of

Tre

eS

ma

llB

igP

rod

uc

- ti

ve

Sm

all

Big

Pro

du

cti

ve

22

JP

48

-

JP

41

Bp

k.

Ah

ma

d1

,10

4

Ja

ti

1

2

50

,00

0

2

50

,00

0

25

0,0

00

23

JP

41

-

JP

36

Ibu

Um

i/m

ina

lti

69

6S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

24

JP

36

-

JP

35

Bp

k.

Je

mi

15

0S

rika

ya

1

7

5,0

00

75

,00

0

95

,00

0

2

10

,00

0

20

,00

0

25

JP

35

-

JP

32

Bp

k.

Ba

di/fitr

i5

40

Po

ho

n

Ja

wa

2

10

,00

0

20

,00

0

20

,00

0

26

JP

32

-

JP

31

Ibu

Min

i6

0S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

27

JP

31

-

JP

29

Bp

k.

Ra

him

/Na

rta

ma

n/

Yu

ria

22

2S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

28

JP

29

-

JP

27

Ibu

R

am

lah

/Ha

lifa

h3

78

Se

ma

k

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

29

JP

27

-

JP

22

Bp

k.

Ja

kir

75

0S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

3

0JP

22

-

JP

19

Bp

k.

Ba

sri

45

0S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

31

JP

19

-

JP

3B

pk.

Usm

an

2

,46

6

Se

ma

k

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

32

JP

3 -

JP

05

Bp

k.

Atm

an

1,1

04

S

em

ak

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

33

JP

05

- S

8B

pk.

Ma

sm

un

/Ha

lifa

h9

36

Se

ma

k

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

34

S8

- S

11

Bp

k.

Am

ba

s1

,05

6

Se

ma

k

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

35

S1

1 -

S1

4B

pk.

Ris

wa

n6

90

Se

ma

k

Be

luka

r

1

00

,00

0

10

0,0

00

2

1,0

99

49

46

93

49

,79

0,0

00

To

tal

27

,12

7.5

0

1

11

77

27

3

1

07

,03

5,0

00

!

"#)!

!AP

PE

ND

IX 8

. C

AL

CU

LA

TIO

N O

F S

EV

ER

EL

Y A

FF

EC

TE

D H

OU

SE

HO

LD

S

No

Bo

un

da

ry S

tak

es

AH

sL

oc

ati

on

(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l P

rod

uc

tiv

e

La

nd

(m²)

Aff

ec

ted

La

nd

(m²)

% A

ffe

cte

d

1

JP

14

4 -

JP

14

0B

pk.

Alm

Ro

tiL

oru

30

,00

0

2,4

00

8%

2

JP

14

0 -

JP

13

4B

pk.

Ja

sru

nL

oru

38

,00

0

1,0

12

.53

%

3

JP

13

4 -

JP

12

8B

pk.

Ka

dir

Lo

ru2

1,0

00

9

78

5%

4

JP

12

8 -

JP

12

1B

pk.

An

di

Lo

ru1

7,5

00

9

90

6%

5

JP

12

1 -

JP

11

9B

pk.

Su

din

Lo

ru1

0,0

00

4

32

4%

6

JP

11

9 -

JP

11

8

Bp

k.

Ae

din

Lo

ru3

0,0

00

2

16

1%

JP

10

5 -

JP

10

3P

om

be

we

40

,00

0

30

0

7

JP

11

8 -

JP

11

7Ib

u.

Sa

na

ira

Po

mb

ew

e4

5,0

00

1

50

2%

JP

10

3 -

JP

95

P

om

be

we

30

,00

0

1,3

33

.8

8

JP

11

7 -

JP

11

2

BP

k.

An

wa

r/H

arn

ya

hP

om

be

we

32

,00

0

77

4.4

82

%

9

JP

11

2 -

JP

10

9B

pk.B

un

ian

Po

mb

ew

e3

0,0

00

4

22

.52

1%

10

JP

10

9 -

JP

10

5B

pk.

Atm

an

P

om

be

we

28

,00

0

60

04

%

JP

3 -

JP

05

Po

mb

ew

e1

3,0

00

1

,10

4

11

JP

95

- J

P 9

0

Bp

k.

Sa

rma

n/A

co

Po

mb

ew

e2

5,0

00

6

16

.23

%

JP

. 7

8 -

JP

73

Po

mb

ew

e1

5,0

00

7

41

.6

JP

54

- J

P 5

0P

om

be

we

15

,00

0

54

0

12

JP

90

- J

P 8

6

Ba

pa

k.

Su

isd

inP

om

be

we

18

,00

0

64

84

%

13

JP

86

- J

P 8

1B

ap

ak H

aju

din

Po

mb

ew

e1

6,0

00

7

02

4%

14

JP

81

- J

P 7

8

Ba

pa

k.

An

sa

r/S

atr

ian

i/Ik

hsa

nP

om

be

we

22

,50

0

48

62

%

15

JP

73

- J

P 7

1B

pk.

Ah

lan

/Nu

r A

isya

h/H

erm

an

Po

mb

ew

e1

5,0

00

2

72

.43

%

JP

63

- J

P 5

8

Po

mb

ew

e1

5,0

00

6

51

!

"#*!

!

No

Bo

un

da

ry S

tak

es

AH

sL

oc

ati

on

(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l P

rod

uc

tiv

e

La

nd

(m²)

Aff

ec

ted

La

nd

(m²)

% A

ffe

cte

d

16

JP

71

- J

P 6

7S

em

pa

da

n S

un

ga

iP

om

be

we

-

60

00

%

17

JP

67

- J

P 6

3

Bp

k.

An

di M

uyu

/Arf

an

Po

mb

ew

e1

5,0

00

5

65

.24

%

18

JP

63

- J

P 6

3

Bp

k.

He

rma

nP

om

be

we

19

,00

0

94

.80

.5%

19

JP

58

- J

P 5

7

Bp

k.

An

ton

Po

mb

ew

e1

5,0

00

1

26

.61

%

20

JP

. 5

7 -

JP

57

Bp

k.

Ja

hir

Po

mb

ew

e1

0,0

00

1

16

.41

%

21

JP

. 5

7 -

JP

54

B

pk.

Ima

nu

el

Po

mb

ew

e1

5,0

00

4

56

3%

22

JP

50

- J

P 4

8Ib

u S

imin

aP

om

be

we

15

,00

0

30

02

%

23

JP

48

- J

P 4

1B

pk.

Ah

ma

dP

om

be

we

85

,00

0

1,1

04

1%

24

JP

41

- J

P 3

6Ib

u U

mi/m

ina

lti

Po

mb

ew

e1

5,0

00

6

96

5%

25

JP

36

- J

P 3

5B

pk.

Je

mi

Po

mb

ew

e1

2,0

00

1

50

1%

26

JP

35

- J

P 3

2B

pk.

Ba

di/fitr

iP

om

be

we

13

,50

0

54

04

%

27

JP

32

- J

P 3

1Ib

u M

ini

Po

mb

ew

e1

5,0

00

6

00

.4%

28

JP

31

- J

P 2

9B

pk.

Ra

him

/Na

rta

ma

n/Y

uri

aP

om

be

we

82

,50

0

22

20

.3%

29

JP

29

- JP

27

Ibu

Ra

mla

h/H

alif

ah

Po

mb

ew

e8

5,0

00

3

78

0.4

%

30

JP

27

- J

P 2

2B

pk.

Ja

kir

Po

mb

ew

e1

0,0

00

7

50

8%

31

JP

22

- J

P 1

9B

pk.

Ba

sri

Po

mb

ew

e1

0,0

00

4

50

5%

32

JP

19

- J

P 3

Bp

k.

Usm

an

P

om

be

we

30

,00

0

2,4

66

8%

33

JP

05

- S

8B

pk.

Ma

sm

un

/Ha

lifa

hP

om

be

we

14

,00

0

93

67

%

34

S8

- S

11

Bp

k.

Am

ba

sP

om

be

we

15

,00

0

1,0

56

7%

35

S1

1 -

S1

4B

pk.

Ris

wa

nP

om

be

we

20

,00

0

69

03

%

To

tal

27

,12

7.5

!

"#$!

!

APPENDIX 9. DOCUMENTATION OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETINGS

A. PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING ON 2 MARCH 2020

• Invitation Letter

Sigi Biromaru, 27 Februari 2020

Nomor :Sifat : Penting Lampiran : 1 (Satu) BerkasPerihal : Undangan Pertemuan Konsultasi Masyarakat (PKM)

Kepada Yth, (Daftar Terlampir)Di -

Tempat

Sehubungan dengan kegiatan “Detail Desain Rehabilitasi Sistem Pasokan Air Baku Pasigala Sulawesi Tengah” khususnya untuk pasokan air di kawasan Huntap Pombewe dengan hormat kami mengundang Bapak/Ibu berkenan menghadiri Pertemuan Konsultasi Masyarakat (PKM) yang akan dilaksanakan pada :

Hari / Tanggal : Senin, 02 Maret 2020Waktu : 08:00 s/d SelesaiTempat : Kantor Pengamat Irigasi Gumbasa Jalan Karaja Lembah Desa SigiAgenda : Pertemuan Konsultasi Masyarakat (PKM)

Demikian kami sampaikan, atas perhatian Bapak/Ibu diucapkan terima kasih.

Kepala Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat

Kabupaten Sigi

HENRI KUSUMA ROMBE, ST., MTNIP. 19681015 199703 1 005

Tembusan disampaikan kepada :

1. Yth. Bupati Sigi di Dolo

2. Yth. Sekretaris Daerah Kabupaten Sigi di Dolo

!

"#"!

!

Daftar Lampiran Undangan

Nomor :

Tanggal : 00 Maret 2020

Daftar Undangan dan Jumlah Peserta :

No. Daftar Undangan Jumlah Peserta

1. Asisten II Bidang Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Sekretariat Daerah Kab. Sigi 1 Orang

2. Kepala Dinas Cipta Karya dan Sumber Daya Air Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah 1 Orang

3. Kepala Dinas Pertanian Kab. Sigi 1 Orang

4. Kepala BP3D Kab. Sigi 1 Orang

5. Kepala Balai Wilayah Sungai Sulawesi III 1 Orang

6. Kepala Balai Prasarana Pemukiman Wilayah Provinsi Sulawei Tengah 1 Orang

7. Camat Sigi Biromaru 1 Orang

8. Kapolsek Sigi Biromaru 1 Orang

9. Kepala BPTP Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah 1 Orang

10. Kepala Bidang SDA Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Kab. Sigi 1 Orang

11. Kepala Bidang TRBK Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Kab. Sigi 1 Orang

12.Kasatker PJPA WS. Palu-Lariang, WS. Parigi-Poso, WS. Kaluku-Karama

Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah1 Orang

13.PPK Air Tanah dan Air Baku WS. Palu-Lariang, WS. Parigi-Poso, WS. Kaluku-Karama

Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah1 Orang

14. Kepala Seksi Pelaksanaan Balai Wilayah Sungai Sulawesi III 1 Orang

15. Kepala BPP Kec. Sigi 1 Orang

16. Pengamat Pengairan Daerah Irigasi Paneki dan Staf - Sigi 5 Orang

17. Pengamat Pengairan Daerah Irigasi Gumbasa dan Staf - Sigi 1 Orang

18. POLMAS Desa Pombewe 1 Orang

19. POLMAS Desa Loru 1 Orang

20. BABINSA Desa Pombewe 1 Orang

21 BABINSA Desa Loru 1 Orang

22. Kepala Desa Pombewe 6 Orang

23. Kepala Desa Loru 2 Orang

24. BPD Desa Pombewe 1 Orang

25. BPD Desa Loru 1 Orang

26. Dewan Adat Desa Pombewe 1 Orang

27. Dewan Adat Desa Loru 1 Orang

28. Gapoktan 2 Orang

29. Ketua P3A 4 Orang

30. PPL Desa Pombewe 1 Orang

31. PPL Desa Loru 1 Orang

!

"#%!

!

• MoM

MINUTES OF MEETING

Date : Monday, 02 March 2020

Place : Kantor Pengamat Irigasi Gumbasa, Jalan Karaja Lembah Desa Sigi

Moderator : Asisten II Bidang Ekonomi dan Pembangunan SEKAB SIGI

Bpk. Iskandar Nongci ST., MSi

Q&A during the meeting

No Questions Answer

1 The head of Pombewe Village requested the explanation regarding Raw Water Planning for Huntap

1Pombewe.

The speakers, Mr. Ir. Hadi Santoso explained that the need of raw water for community in Pombewe and Loru only requires 25 L/sec.

2 The officer of P3A (water user farmers association) informed that Paneki irrigation still lacks of water.

Mr. Ir. Hadi Santoso, based on direct measurements, the Paneki river discharge is between 400 to 500 L/sec and it is sufficient for irrigation purposes.

3 Pombewe Village Secretary hopes that the raw water network plan for Huntap will not affect to the community's livelihood.

Asisten II said that the government thinks about the needs of people, including the people affected by the liquefaction of Jono Oge Village.

4 Loru village community leader requested that the government makes a new source by drilling.

Asisten II informed that the government has made efforts for drilling, but the result is hot and run out.

5 Juru pengairan D.I Paneki provided information as below:

- The potential area of D.I Paneki is 500 Ha

- The functional area is ± 262 Ha

He also requested to fix the pipeline.

Mr. Ir. Hadi Santoso is grateful for the information and informed that rehabilitation of Paneki irrigation pipeline is the responsibility of the Local Government.

6 Head of Loru Village requested for another public consultation meeting to get a more detailed explanation.

Asisten II agreed to schedule another consultation meeting.

1

Huntap stands for Hunian Tetap or permanent residence

!

"#&!

!

Photos During Consultation Meeting

!

"##!

!

• Attendance List

!

"#'!

!

!

"#(!

!

B. PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING ON 12 MARCH 2020

• Meeting Invitation

!

"#)!

!

!

"#*!

!

• MoMMINUTES OF MEETING

Date : Thursday,12 March 2020

Place : Gedung Pramuka Mandala Paneki

Moderator : Bapak Henry Rombe, S.T. (Kepala Dinas PU Sigi)

No Question Answer

1 Head of Mpanau Village

- How do community in the 5 villages (Pombewe, Loru, Lolu, Mpanau, and Petobo) get enough water to irrigate their fields?

- Community in Mpanau Village only get a small amount of water from Pombewe Village.

Mr. Ir. Hadi Santoso

Water will remain for 5 villages. The distribution of water can be arranged and prioritized which one is needed between raw water and irrigation water for farmers.

2 Secretary of BPD Pombewe

- What if the people's representatives are presented, so that there is no one-sided agreement.

- The problem is why the water should be from from Pombewe, not from Wuno or others and how is the distribution?

Mr. Ir. Hadi Santoso

Everything has been taken into consideration. The reason why it should be from Pombewe because the raw water is only for Pombewe village and its surroundings

3 Sadlan (Poktan/Farmer group of Pombewe Village)

Need detail information regarding community needs on drinking water.

Mr. Henry Rombe, S.T.

He conveyed the water distribution to make it clearer.

4 Poktan of Loru Village

- Looking at the long term, is the need sufficient for the five villages? What are the alternatives if it is a deficit?

Head of subdistrict

There is a regulation for water usage and will not be harmful to the community

5 Head of Mpanau Village

What are the alternatives?

The potential area that can be irrigated is 500 ha and 242 ha of rice fields. The lack of water in the river is not all year long, only at certain times and this has been surveyed. Now the water collection system in the community is free taking by Pombewe and Loru communities, but later Bendung will be built, but does not reduce water for irrigation, the minimum discharge is 390 L/s. The Paneki River is a river with a continuous flow of water throughout the year (25 L/s or approximately 21 thousand/day). The needs in the surrounding community are still below 21 thousand/day, so there is no need to worry about a shortage.

Suggestions and summary:

1. Loru Village Residents

If possible, the preliminary design or initial planning from consultant is shown.

!

"#+!

!

2. Poktan of Loru Village

All of subdistrict punggawa must be invited.

3. Asisten II - Iskandar nontji

- The original objective was to ask permission from the village community first.

- Initial design to be shown to the community to better understanding.

4. Village Secretary of Pombewe

- Present special teams (irrigation, technical raw water and others)

- Conduct consultation meeting per village

- Show a simple schematic of the intake

- If possible, provide information in power point and using infocus projector

5. Summary of Asisten II

Some of community have agreed. A suggestion for consultants is to hold another consultation meeting with a clearer description of water distribution so that the community can more understand.

6. The head of P3A is agree.

Summary of the meeting:

Public consultation meeting is to be held to show water distribution or transmission pipe.

!

"'$!

!

Photos during Public Consultation Meeting

!

"'"!

!

• Attendance List

!

"'%!

!

!

"'&!

!

!

"'#!

!

C. PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING ON 4 JULY 2020


!

"''!

!

!

"'(!

!

• MoM

!

"')!

!

!

"'*!

!

!

"'+!

!

!

"($!

!

• Attendance List

!

"("!

!

!

"(%!

!

D. PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING ON 7 JULY 2020


!

"(&!

!

!

"(#!

!

• MoM

!

"('!

!

!

"((!

!

!

"()!

!

!

"(*!

!

• Attendance List

!

"(+!

!

!

"#$!

!AP

PE

ND

IX 1

0.

SO

CIO

-EC

ON

OM

IC D

AT

A

•A

ge

, M

ari

tal

Sta

tus

, E

du

ca

tio

n,

Oc

cu

pa

tio

n,

No

. o

f F

am

ily

Me

mb

er,

an

d M

on

thly

In

co

me

No

AH

sV

illa

ge

Re

sp

on

-d

en

tH

HH

ea

dA

ge

Re

lig

ion

Eth

nic

ity

Ma

rita

l S

tatu

sL

as

t E

du

ca

tio

nO

cc

up

ati

on

Fa

mil

y

Me

mb

er

Mo

nth

ly

Inc

om

e

(ID

R)

1

Ro

ti (

Alm

)/

Je

mi(

an

ak A

lm)

Lo

ruM

M

5

0Is

lam

Ka

iliM

arr

ied

SM

AL

ab

or

5

2,5

00

,00

0

2

Ja

sru

nL

oru

M

M

51

Isla

mK

aili

Ma

rrie

dS

MP

Fa

rme

r6

2

,50

0,0

00

3

Ka

dir

Lo

ruM

M

5

6Is

lam

Ka

iliM

arr

ied

SD

Fa

rme

r3

2

,50

0,0

00

4

An

di

Lo

ruM

M

3

9Is

lam

Bu

gis

Ma

rrie

dS

DF

arm

er

5

2,5

00

,00

0

5

Ae

din

*L

oru

M

M

74

Isla

mJa

va

ne

se

Ma

rrie

dS

MP

Fa

rme

r6

2

,50

0,0

00

6

Sa

na

ira

*P

om

be

we

F

M

77

Isla

mK

aili

Ma

rrie

dN

o s

ch

oo

l/n

ot

co

mp

lete

dF

arm

er

2

2,5

00

,00

0

7

An

wa

r/H

arn

ya

h*

Po

mb

ew

eF

F

6

7Is

lam

Ka

iliS

po

use

is

pa

sse

d a

wa

yS

DF

arm

er

1

2,5

00

,00

0

8

Bu

nia

nP

om

be

we

M

M

64

Isla

mK

aili

Ma

rrie

dS

MA

En

tre

pre

ne

ur

2

2,5

00

,00

0

9

Atm

an

Po

mb

ew

eM

M

4

6Is

lam

Ka

iliM

arr

ied

S2

Civ

il S

erv

an

t4

5

,00

0,0

00

10

Sa

rma

n/a

co

Po

mb

ew

eM

M

4

6Is

lam

Bu

gis

Ma

rrie

dS

DF

arm

er

5

2,5

00

,00

0

11

Su

isd

inP

om

be

we

M

M

50

Isla

mB

ug

isM

arr

ied

SM

AF

arm

er

5

2,5

00

,00

0

12

Ha

jud

inP

om

be

we

M

M

61

Isla

mJa

va

ne

se

Ma

rrie

dS

MP

La

bo

r5

2

,50

0,0

00

13

An

sa

r/S

atr

ian

iP

om

be

we

F

M

45

Isla

mB

ug

isM

arr

ied

SD

Fa

rme

r3

2

,50

0,0

00

14

Ah

lan

/Nu

r A

isya

hP

om

be

we

F

M

57

Isla

mK

aili

Ma

rrie

dS

3L

ectu

rer

3

10

,00

0,0

00

15

An

di

Mu

yu

/Arf

an

Po

mb

ew

eM

M

6

0Is

lam

Ka

iliM

arr

ied

S2

Civ

il S

erv

an

t3

5

,00

0,0

00

16

He

rma

nP

om

be

we

M

M

45

Isla

mK

aili

Sp

ou

se

is

pa

sse

d a

wa

yN

o s

ch

oo

l/n

ot

co

mp

lete

dF

arm

er

1

2,5

00

,00

0

17

An

ton

Po

mb

ew

eM

M

3

8Is

lam

Bu

gis

Ma

rrie

dS

DF

arm

er

5

2,5

00

,00

01

8Im

an

ue

lP

om

be

we

M

M

57

Isla

mK

aili

Ma

rrie

dS

DF

arm

er

4

2,5

00

,00

0

19

Ah

ma

dP

om

be

we

M

M

31

Isla

mM

an

da

rM

arr

ied

S1

Pri

va

te

Em

plo

ye

e2

2

,50

0,0

00

20

Um

i/M

ina

lti

Po

mb

ew

eF

M

3

9Is

lam

Ma

nd

ar

Ma

rrie

dS

DF

arm

er

7

2,5

00

,00

0

!

"#"!

!No

AH

sV

illa

ge

Re

sp

on

-d

en

tH

HH

ea

dA

ge

Re

lig

ion

Eth

nic

ity

Ma

rita

l S

tatu

sL

as

t E

du

ca

tio

nO

cc

up

ati

on

Fa

mil

y

Me

mb

er

Mo

nth

ly

Inc

om

e

(ID

R)

21

Je

mi

Po

mb

ew

eM

M

5

0Is

lam

Ba

nja

rM

arr

ied

SM

AL

ab

or

5

2,5

00

,00

0

22

Ba

di/F

itri

Po

mb

ew

eF

M

6

0Is

lam

Ka

iliM

arr

ied

SD

Fa

rme

r8

2

,50

0,0

00

23

Min

iP

om

be

we

F

M

60

Isla

mB

ug

isM

arr

ied

SD

Fa

rme

r8

2

,50

0,0

00

24

Ra

him

/Yu

ria

*P

om

be

we

F

F

63

Isla

mB

ug

isS

po

use

is

pa

sse

d a

wa

yS

DF

arm

er

2

2,5

00

,00

0

25

Ra

mla

h/H

alif

ah

Po

mb

ew

eF

M

5

6Is

lam

Bu

gis

Ma

rrie

dS

MP

Fa

rme

r5

2

,50

0,0

00

26

Ma

sm

un

/Ha

lifa

hP

om

be

we

F

M

56

Isla

m

Bu

gis

Ma

rrie

dS

MP

Fa

rme

r5

2

,50

0,0

00

27

Am

ba

sP

om

be

we

M

M

65

Isla

mB

ug

isM

arr

ied

SD

Fa

rme

r5

2

,50

0,0

00

11

5**

No

te:

*Vu

lne

rab

le H

ou

se

ho

lds

**T

ota

l fa

mily

me

mb

er

of

all

AH

s is 1

45

(fa

mily

me

mb

er

of

27

AH

s is 1

15

an

d 7

AH

s is 3

0 u

sin

ge

stim

atio

n b

ase

d o

n t

he

ave

rag

e h

ou

se

ho

ld s

ize

of

the

oth

er

AH

s o

bta

ine

d b

y t

he

SE

S a

nd

IO

L).

•P

roo

f o

f L

an

d O

wn

ers

hip

No

IOL

Da

teB

ou

nd

ary

Sta

ke

sC

oo

rdin

ate

AH

sA

dd

res

s(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l L

an

dO

wn

ed

b

y A

Hs

La

nd

Re

qu

ire

d b

y P

roje

ct

Pro

of

of

La

nd

Ow

ne

rsh

ipJ

PR

igh

tL

eft

Siz

e (

m)

To

tal

(m²)

1

27

-28

Ju

ne

JP

14

4 -

JP

14

01

44

X =

83

08

04

.55

8X

= 8

30

80

7.5

56

Bp

k.

Ro

tiL

oru

3 H

a1

00

x 2

42

,40

0

PB

B

Y =

98

93

14

1.1

07

Y =

98

93

10

8.2

43

14

0X

= 8

30

71

7.6

43

X =

83

07

29

.54

0

Y =

98

93

09

7.1

87

Y =

98

93

08

8.0

52

2

27

-28

Ju

ne

JP

14

0 -

JP

13

41

40

X =

83

07

17

.64

3X

= 8

30

72

9.5

40

Bp

k.

Ja

sru

nL

oru

3.8

Ha

1

,01

2.5

S

KP

T

Y =

98

93

09

7.1

87

Y =

98

93

08

8.0

52

13

4X

= 8

30

71

8.7

69

X =

83

07

23

.92

0

Y =

98

92

96

0.7

52

Y =

98

92

96

3.8

28

3

27

-28

Ju

ne

JP

13

4 -

JP

12

81

34

X =

83

07

18

.76

9X

= 8

30

72

3.9

20

Bp

k.

Ka

dir

Lo

ru2

.1H

a1

63

x 6

97

8S

KP

T

Y =

98

92

96

0.7

52

Y =

98

92

96

3.8

28

!

"#%!

!No

IOL

Da

teB

ou

nd

ary

Sta

ke

sC

oo

rdin

ate

AH

sA

dd

res

s(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l L

an

dO

wn

ed

b

y A

Hs

La

nd

Re

qu

ire

d b

y P

roje

ct

Pro

of

of

La

nd

Ow

ne

rsh

ipJ

PR

igh

tL

eft

Siz

e (

m)

To

tal

(m²)

12

8X

= 8

30

58

9.2

84

X =

83

05

94

.47

3

Y =

98

92

89

1.3

37

Y =

98

92

88

8.3

26

4

27

-28

Ju

ne

JP

12

8 -

JP

12

11

28

X =

83

05

89

.28

4X

= 8

30

59

4.4

73

Bp

k.

An

di

Lo

ru1

.75

ha

16

5 x

6

99

0S

KP

T

Y =

98

92

89

1.3

37

Y =

98

92

88

8.3

26

12

1X

= 8

30

51

3.2

63

X =

83

05

17

.10

1

Y =

98

92

75

4.5

86

Y =

98

92

74

9.9

74

5

27

-28

Ju

ne

JP

12

1 -

JP

11

91

21

X =

83

05

13

.26

3X

= 8

30

51

7.1

01

Bp

k.

Su

din

Lo

ru1

Ha

72

x 6

43

2P

BB

Y =

98

92

75

4.5

86

Y =

98

92

74

9.9

74

11

9X

= 8

30

45

2.0

09

X =

83

04

57

.78

1

Y =

98

92

70

2.6

36

Y =

98

92

70

1.0

04

6

27

-28

Ju

ne

JP

11

9 -

JP

11

8

11

9X

= 8

30

45

2.0

09

X =

83

04

57

.78

1B

pk.

Ae

din

Lo

ru3

Ha

36

x 6

2

16

PB

B

Y =

98

92

70

2.6

36

Y =

98

92

70

1.0

04

11

8X

= 8

30

43

9.0

60

X =

83

04

42

.98

6

Y =

98

92

65

9.6

83

Y =

98

92

65

4.6

21

To

tal

Aff

ec

ted

La

nd

in

Lo

ru V

illa

ge

6,0

28

.5

1

14

Ju

ne

JP

11

8 -

JP

11

71

18

X =

83

04

39

.06

0X

= 8

30

44

2.9

86

Ibu

. S

an

air

aP

om

be

we

4.5

Ha

6 x

25

15

0P

BB

Y =

98

96

59

.68

3Y

= 9

89

26

54

.62

1

11

7X

= 8

30

41

5.9

46

X =

83

04

17

.86

1

Y =

98

92

65

2.7

25

Y =

98

92

64

7.0

42

2

14

Ju

ne

JP

11

7-

JP

11

2

11

7X

= 8

30

41

5.9

46

X =

83

04

17

.86

1B

pk.

An

wa

r/H

arn

ya

hP

om

be

we

3.2

Ha

6 x

12

9.5

87

74

.48

PB

B

Y =

98

92

65

2.7

25

Y =

98

92

64

7.0

42

11

2X

= 8

30

29

7.4

52

X =

83

02

94

.87

7

Y =

98

92

63

1.3

63

Y =

98

92

62

5.9

42

3

14

Ju

ne

JP

11

2 -

JP

10

91

12

X =

83

02

97

.45

2X

= 8

30

29

4.8

77

Bp

k.

Bu

nia

nP

om

be

we

3 H

a6

x 7

0.4

24

22

.52

PB

B

Y =

98

92

63

1.3

63

Y =

98

92

62

5.9

42

10

9X

= 8

30

23

2.2

54

X =

83

02

33

.59

0

Y =

98

92

64

8.7

11

Y =

98

92

64

2.8

62

4

14

Ju

ne

JP

10

9 -

JP

10

51

09

X =

83

02

32

.25

4X

= 8

30

23

3.5

90

Bp

k.

Atm

an

P

om

be

we

2.8

Ha

6 x

10

06

00

PB

B

Y =

98

92

64

8.7

11

Y =

98

92

64

2.8

62

10

5X

= 8

30

14

1.7

17

X =

83

01

42

.72

8

!

"#&!

!No

IOL

Da

teB

ou

nd

ary

Sta

ke

sC

oo

rdin

ate

AH

sA

dd

res

s(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l L

an

dO

wn

ed

b

y A

Hs

La

nd

Re

qu

ire

d b

y P

roje

ct

Pro

of

of

La

nd

Ow

ne

rsh

ipJ

PR

igh

tL

eft

Siz

e (

m)

To

tal

(m²)

Y =

98

92

60

8.7

51

Y =

98

92

60

2.8

37

5

14

Ju

ne

JP

10

5 -

JP

10

31

05

X =

83

01

41

.71

7X

= 8

30

14

2.7

28

Bp

k.

Ae

din

Po

mb

ew

e4

ha

6 x

50

3

00

PB

B

Y =

98

92

60

8.7

51

Y =

98

92

60

2.8

37

10

3X

= 8

30

09

1.6

28

X =

83

00

92

.72

4

Y =

98

92

60

6.7

91

Y =

98

92

60

0.8

92

6

14

Ju

ne

JP

10

3 -

JP

95

1

03

X =

83

00

91

.62

8X

= 8

30

09

2.7

24

Ibu

Sa

na

ira

Po

mb

ew

e3

Ha

6 x

22

2.3

1,3

33

.8

PB

B

Y =

98

92

60

6.7

91

Y =

98

92

60

0.8

92

95

X =

82

99

08

.87

0X

= 8

29

91

4.0

40

Y =

98

92

50

2.4

87

Y =

98

92

49

9.4

42

7

14

Ju

ne

JP

95

- J

P 9

09

5X

= 8

29

90

8.8

70

X =

82

99

14

.04

0B

pk.

Sa

rma

n/A

co

Po

mb

ew

e2

.5H

a6

x 1

02

.76

16

.2P

BB

Y =

98

92

50

2.4

87

Y =

98

92

49

9.4

42

90

X =

82

98

71

.50

0X

= 8

29

87

7.4

80

Y =

98

92

40

6.4

35

Y =

98

92

40

6.9

26

8

14

Ju

ne

JP

90

- J

P 8

6

90

X =

82

98

71

.50

0X

= 8

29

87

7.4

80

Bp

k.

Su

isd

inP

om

be

we

1.8

Ha

6 x

10

86

48

PB

B

Y =

98

92

40

6.4

35

Y =

98

92

40

6.9

26

86

X =

82

98

56

.66

5X

= 8

29

85

9.9

55

Y =

98

92

31

1.0

87

Y =

98

92

30

6.5

55

9

14

Ju

ne

JP

86

- J

P 8

18

6X

= 8

29

85

6.6

65

X =

82

98

59

.95

5B

pk.

Ha

jud

inP

om

be

we

1.6

Ha

6 x

11

77

02

SK

PT

Y =

98

92

31

1.0

87

Y =

98

92

30

6.5

55

81

X =

82

97

50

.36

0X

= 8

29

75

0.6

74

Y =

98

92

27

3.5

00

Y =

98

92

26

7.5

08

10

14

Ju

ne

JP

81

- J

P 7

8

81

X =

82

97

50

.36

0X

= 8

29

75

0.6

74

Bp

k.

An

sa

rP

om

be

we

2.2

5H

a6

x 8

14

86

SK

PT

Y =

98

92

27

3.5

00

Y =

98

92

26

7.5

08

/Sa

tria

ni/Ik

hsa

n

78

X =

82

96

71

.08

0X

= 8

29

66

9.6

24

Y =

98

92

27

9.2

16

Y =

98

92

27

3.5

01

11

14

Ju

ne

JP

78

- JP

73

78

X =

82

96

71

.08

0X

= 8

29

66

9.6

24

Bp

k.

Sa

rma

n/A

co

Po

mb

ew

e1

.5 H

a6

x 1

23

.67

41

.6P

BB

Y =

98

92

27

9.2

16

Y =

98

92

27

3.5

01

73

X =

82

95

60

.84

5X

= 8

29

56

5.0

29

Y =

98

92

24

2.1

84

Y =

98

92

23

7.8

84

12

14

Ju

ne

JP

73

- J

P 7

17

3X

= 8

29

56

0.8

45

X =

82

95

65

.02

9B

pk.

Ah

lan

Po

mb

ew

e3

Ha

6 x

45

.42

72

.4A

kta

Ju

al B

eli

Y =

98

92

24

2.1

84

Y =

98

92

23

7.8

84

!

"#'!

!No

IOL

Da

teB

ou

nd

ary

Sta

ke

sC

oo

rdin

ate

AH

sA

dd

res

s(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l L

an

dO

wn

ed

b

y A

Hs

La

nd

Re

qu

ire

d b

y P

roje

ct

Pro

of

of

La

nd

Ow

ne

rsh

ipJ

PR

igh

tL

eft

Siz

e (

m)

To

tal

(m²)

71

X =

82

95

28

.91

1X

= 8

29

53

3.1

27

/Nu

r A

isya

h/H

erm

an

Y =

98

92

20

9.7

63

Y =

98

92

20

5.4

97

13

15

Ju

ne

JP

71

- J

P 6

77

1X

= 8

29

52

8.9

11

X =

82

95

33

.12

7S

em

pa

da

n S

un

ga

iP

om

be

we

6

x 1

00

60

0P

BB

Y =

98

92

20

9.7

63

Y =

98

92

20

5.4

97

67

X =

82

94

63

.40

5X

= 8

29

46

7.8

04

Y =

98

92

13

3.9

94

Y =

98

92

12

9.9

17

14

15

Ju

ne

JP

67

- J

P 6

3

67

X =

82

94

63

.40

5X

= 8

29

46

7.8

04

Bp

k.

An

di M

uyu

/Arf

an

Po

mb

ew

e1

.5H

a6

x 9

4.2

56

5.2

Akta

Ju

al B

eli

Y =

98

92

13

3.9

94

Y =

98

92

12

9.9

17

63

X =

82

93

90

.34

5X

= 8

29

39

5.4

47

Y =

98

92

07

9.5

69

Y =

98

92

07

6.4

11

15

15

Ju

ne

JP

63

- J

P 6

3

63

X =

82

93

90

.34

5X

= 8

29

39

5.4

47

Bp

k.

He

rma

nP

om

be

we

1.9

ha

6 x

15

.89

4.8

PB

B

Y =

98

92

07

9.5

69

Y =

98

92

07

6.4

11

63

X =

82

93

81

.76

9X

= 8

29

38

6.8

71

Y =

98

92

06

6.3

60

Y =

98

92

06

3.2

01

16

15

Ju

ne

JP

. 6

3 -

JP

58

6

3X

= 8

29

38

1.7

69

X =

82

93

86

.87

1B

pk.

Ah

lan

Po

mb

ew

e1

,5 H

a6

x 1

08

.56

51

Akta

Ju

al B

eli

Y =

98

92

06

6.3

60

Y =

98

92

06

3.2

01

58

X =

82

92

91

.23

7X

= 8

29

29

4.1

65

/Nu

r A

isya

h/H

erm

an

Y =

98

92

01

0.3

30

Y =

98

92

00

5.0

98

17

15

Ju

ne

JP

58

- J

P 5

7

58

X =

82

92

91

.23

7X

= 8

29

29

4.1

65

Bp

k.

An

ton

Po

mb

ew

e1

.5 H

a6

x 2

1.1

01

26

.6S

KP

T

Y =

98

92

01

0.3

30

Y =

98

92

00

5.0

98

57

X =

82

92

73

.10

4X

= 8

29

27

6.5

38

Y =

98

91

99

9.6

03

Y =

98

91

99

4.6

83

18

15

Ju

ne

JP

57

- J

P 5

75

7X

= 8

29

27

3.1

04

X =

82

92

76

.53

8B

pk.

Ja

hir

Po

mb

ew

e1

Ha

6 x

19

.41

16

.4P

BB

Y =

98

91

99

9.6

03

Y =

98

91

99

4.6

83

57

X =

82

92

58

.83

9X

= 8

29

26

4.2

18

Y =

98

91

98

5.2

32

Y =

98

91

98

2.5

72

19

15

Ju

ne

JP

57

- J

P5

45

7

X =

82

92

58

.83

9X

= 8

29

26

4.2

18

Bp

k.

Ima

nu

el

Po

mb

ew

e1

.5H

a6

x 7

64

56

SK

PT

Y =

98

91

98

5.2

32

Y =

98

91

98

2.5

72

54

X =

83

04

15

.94

6X

= 8

30

41

7.8

61

Y =

98

92

65

2.7

25

Y =

98

92

64

7.0

42

20

15

Ju

ne

JP

54

- J

P 5

05

4X

= 8

30

41

5.9

46

X =

83

04

17

.86

1B

pk.

Sa

rma

n/A

co

Po

mb

ew

e1

.5H

a6

x 9

05

40

PB

B

!

"#(!

!No

IOL

Da

teB

ou

nd

ary

Sta

ke

sC

oo

rdin

ate

AH

sA

dd

res

s(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l L

an

dO

wn

ed

b

y A

Hs

La

nd

Re

qu

ire

d b

y P

roje

ct

Pro

of

of

La

nd

Ow

ne

rsh

ipJ

PR

igh

tL

eft

Siz

e (

m)

To

tal

(m²)

Y =

98

92

65

2.7

25

Y =

98

92

64

7.0

42

50

X =

82

92

87

.39

3X

= 8

29

29

2.8

97

Y =

98

91

83

2.8

33

Y =

98

91

83

0.4

44

21

22

Ju

ne

JP

50

- J

P 4

85

0X

= 8

29

28

7.3

93

X =

82

92

92

.89

7Ib

u S

imin

aP

om

be

we

1.5

Ha

6 x

50

30

0P

BB

Y =

98

91

83

2.8

33

Y =

98

91

83

0.4

44

48

X =

82

92

51

.65

1X

= 8

29

25

1.9

47

Y =

98

91

80

2.4

75

Y =

98

91

79

6.4

85

22

22

Ju

ne

JP

48

- J

P 4

14

8X

= 8

29

25

1.6

51

X =

82

92

51

.94

7B

pk.

Ah

ma

dP

om

be

we

8.5

ha

6 x

18

41

10

4S

KP

T

Y =

98

91

80

2.4

75

Y =

98

91

79

6.4

85

41

X =

82

90

89

.30

2X

= 8

29

09

2.8

97

Y =

98

91

82

6.0

47

Y =

98

91

82

1.3

11

23

22

Ju

ne

JP

41

- J

P 3

64

1X

= 8

29

08

9.3

02

X =

82

90

92

.89

7Ib

u U

mi/M

ina

lti

Po

mb

ew

e1

.5H

a6

x 1

16

69

6P

BB

Y =

98

91

82

6.0

47

Y =

98

91

82

1.3

11

36

X =

82

90

01

.38

5X

= 8

28

99

6.6

53

Y =

98

91

86

4.3

46

Y =

98

91

86

0.6

57

24

22

Ju

ne

JP

36

- J

P 3

53

6X

= 8

29

00

1.3

85

X =

82

89

96

.65

3B

pk.

Je

mi

Po

mb

ew

e1

.2 H

a6

x 2

51

50

PB

B

Y =

98

91

86

4.3

46

Y =

98

91

86

0.6

57

35

X =

82

89

90

.13

8X

= 8

28

98

5.9

06

Y =

98

91

88

7.0

14

Y =

98

91

88

2.8

22

25

22

Ju

ne

JP

35

- J

P 3

23

5X

= 8

28

99

0.1

38

X =

82

89

85

.90

6B

ap

ak B

ad

i/fitr

iP

om

be

we

13

.5 H

a6

x 9

05

40

PB

B

Y =

98

91

88

7.0

14

Y =

98

91

88

2.8

22

32

X =

82

89

02

.32

2X

= 8

28

90

4.7

40

Y =

98

91

90

0.2

16

Y =

98

91

89

4.7

25

26

23

Ju

ne

JP

32

- J

P 3

13

2X

= 8

28

90

2.3

22

X =

82

89

04

.74

0Ib

u M

ini

Po

mb

ew

e1

.5H

a6

x 1

06

0P

BB

Y =

98

91

90

0.2

16

Y =

98

91

89

4.7

25

31

X =

82

88

93

.35

3X

= 8

28

89

5.7

72

Y =

98

91

89

5.7

93

Y =

98

91

89

0.3

02

27

23

Ju

ne

JP

31

- J

P 2

93

1X

= 8

28

89

3.3

53

X =

82

88

95

.77

2B

pk.

Ra

him

Po

mb

ew

e8

.25

Ha

6 x

37

22

2S

KP

T

Y =

98

91

89

5.7

93

Y =

98

91

89

0.3

02

29

X =

82

88

58

.87

6X

= 8

28

85

9.6

40

/Na

rta

ma

n/Y

uri

a

Y =

98

91

88

5.5

28

Y =

98

91

87

9.6

08

!

"#)!

!No

IOL

Da

teB

ou

nd

ary

Sta

ke

sC

oo

rdin

ate

AH

sA

dd

res

s(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l L

an

dO

wn

ed

b

y A

Hs

La

nd

Re

qu

ire

d b

y P

roje

ct

Pro

of

of

La

nd

Ow

ne

rsh

ipJ

PR

igh

tL

eft

Siz

e (

m)

To

tal

(m²)

28

23

Ju

ne

JP

29

- J

P 2

72

9X

= 8

28

85

8.8

76

X =

82

88

59

.64

0Ib

u.

Ra

mla

h/H

alif

ah

Po

mb

ew

e8

.5H

a6

x 6

33

78

SK

PT

Y =

98

91

88

5.5

28

Y =

98

91

87

9.6

08

27

X =

82

87

99

.56

3X

= 8

28

80

2.1

82

Y =

98

91

86

6.6

48

Y =

98

91

86

1.2

53

29

23

Ju

ne

JP

27

- J

P 2

22

7X

= 8

28

79

9.5

63

X =

82

88

02

.18

2B

pk.

Ja

kir

Po

mb

ew

e1

Ha

6 x

12

57

50

PB

B

Y =

98

91

86

6.6

48

Y =

98

91

86

1.2

53

22

X =

82

86

90

.72

5X

= 8

28

69

4.4

52

Y =

98

91

80

6.9

80

Y =

98

91

80

2.2

82

30

23

Ju

ne

JP

22

- J

P 1

92

2X

= 8

28

69

0.7

25

X =

82

86

94

.45

2B

pk.

Ba

sri

Po

mb

ew

e1

Ha

6 x

75

45

0P

BB

Y =

98

91

80

6.9

80

Y =

98

91

80

2.2

82

19

X =

82

86

31

.91

2X

= 8

28

63

5.6

02

Y =

98

91

76

0.8

87

Y =

98

91

75

6.1

60

31

23

Ju

ne

JP

19

- J

P 3

19

X =

82

86

31

.91

2X

= 8

28

63

5.6

02

Bp

k.

Usm

an

P

om

be

we

3 H

a6

x 4

11

2,4

66

P

BB

Y =

98

91

76

0.8

87

Y =

98

91

75

6.1

60

3

X =

82

82

56

.94

5X

= 8

28

25

9.4

27

Y =

98

91

63

9.6

39

Y =

98

91

63

4.1

80

32

23

Ju

ne

JP

3 -

JP

05

3

X =

82

82

56

.94

5X

= 8

28

25

9.4

27

Bp

k.

Atm

an

Po

mb

ew

e1

.3H

a6

x 1

84

1,1

04

P

BB

Y =

98

91

63

9.6

39

Y =

98

91

63

4.1

80

05

X =

82

81

22

.65

2X

= 8

28

12

8.5

73

Y =

98

91

55

6.7

84

Y =

98

91

55

7.7

51

33

23

Ju

ne

JP

05

- S

80

5X

= 8

28

12

2.6

52

X =

82

81

28

.57

3B

pk.

Ma

sm

un

/Ha

lifa

hP

om

be

we

1.4

Ha

6 x

15

69

36

SK

PT

Y =

98

91

55

6.7

84

Y =

98

91

55

7.7

51

S8

X =

82

79

87

.52

2X

= 8

27

98

9.8

34

Y =

98

91

51

2.2

19

Y =

98

91

50

6.6

83

34

23

Ju

ne

S8

- S

11

S8

X =

82

79

87

.52

2X

= 8

27

98

9.8

34

Bp

k.

Am

ba

sP

om

be

we

1.5

Ha

6x 1

76

1,0

56

P

BB

Y =

98

91

51

2.2

19

Y =

98

91

50

6.6

83

S1

1X

=8

27

97

1.2

47

X =

82

79

77

.13

8

Y =

98

91

36

8.7

06

Y =

98

91

36

8.4

96

35

23

Ju

ne

S1

1 -

S1

4S

11

X =

82

79

71

.24

7X

= 8

27

97

7.1

38

Bp

k.

Ris

wa

nP

om

be

we

2 H

a6

x 1

15

69

0P

BB

Y =

98

91

36

8.7

06

Y =

98

91

36

8.4

96

S1

4X

= 8

27

94

2.2

85

X =

82

79

47

.93

2

!

"##!

!No

IOL

Da

teB

ou

nd

ary

Sta

ke

sC

oo

rdin

ate

AH

sA

dd

res

s(V

illa

ge

)T

ota

l L

an

dO

wn

ed

b

y A

Hs

La

nd

Re

qu

ire

d b

y P

roje

ct

Pro

of

of

La

nd

Ow

ne

rsh

ipJ

PR

igh

tL

eft

Siz

e (

m)

To

tal

(m²)

Y =

98

91

26

0.4

03

Y =

98

91

25

8.3

83

To

tal

Aff

ec

ted

La

nd

in

Po

mb

ew

e2

1,0

99

!

"#$!

!

Appendix 11. Semi-annual Monitoring Report Template

OUTLINE INTERNAL MONITORING REPORT

I. Introduction

A. Project Objectives

Provide this sections with the project objectives as consistently as possible, refer to

stipulations in both the PAM and the Framework.

B. Project Components

With reference to the PAM and the Framework, enumerate and briefly describe the subproject components in this sections

Provides summary of sub project in the following table

Table x Summary of Subproject

No Package No Sub Project Name District Type of Works

C. Scope of Project Impacts

Present impacts by loss per subproject as applicable, discuss each and should there be changes through each monitoring period.

• Per IOL/DMS – Losses (land, structure, trees, and crops)

• Impact on customary community, if any (Group and number of AHs)

• By severity (Number of AHs)

• Permanent/Temporary (Number of AHs)• By vulnerability (Number of AHs)

Summarize the scope of project impacts in the following table

!

"#$!

!Ta

ble

xx

. S

co

pe

of

Imp

ac

ts A

cro

ss

Su

bp

roje

cts

(Pla

nn

i ng

Sta

ge

)

!

"#$!

!

II. Objectives and Scope of Scope of Social Safeguards Internal Monitoring

A. Objectives of Internal Monitoring

The objective of internal monitoring was to oversee the implementation progress of the land

acquisition and resettlement activities, includes implementation of livelihood restoration

program, periodically in order to ensure that it was implemented as planned and that

mitigating measures designed to address adverse social impacts are adequate and effective.

B. Scope of Social Safeguards Internal Monitoring

These sections provide text for the following table that mentioned summary of the required social safeguards document per subproject and their status during the monitoring period.

Provides relevant explanantions if any delay of the completion of social sageguards document.

Table xx. Status of Required Social Safeguards Documents as of (Date, Month, Year)

Subproject

Social Safeguards Document & Status Remarks (explain if any delay

of the completion of document

of other remarks)Document Status

Sub project xxx Draft LARP/RP Completed

Sub project yyy Draft LARP/RP

Sub project zzz RCCDP

etc Due Dilligence

etc

III. Resettlement Plan/LARP Implementation Progress

A. Consultation, participation and information disclosure

Consultation and participations

Tthis section provides text for following table that summarizes the public consultation and participation of affected households and communities surrounding and outcome during the

monitoring period. Attendance will be disaggregated by gender and (ethnicity – if the project

involves customary community)

Table xxx Summary of Consultations Conducted as of (Date, Month, Year)

Subproject Village/Sub Village

Consultation Topic*

Date Venue Participants**Key

IssuesM F

CC Non CC

CC Non CC

Subproject xxxxxx

Subproject yyyyyyy

etc

*) Example : (i).Project planning and potential impacts, (ii). Land acquistion and resettlement principle and

procedure, (iii). Consultation prior to IOL/SES survey, (iv). FGD to triangulate IOL/SES result, (v). FGD to asses

program for LRP, (vi). consultation to get feedback of mitigation measures set in the LARP, (vii) Others......**) specify how many of them are AHs/APs.

!

"#"!

!

Table xxxx Summary of Information Disclosure as of (Date, Month, Year)

SubprojectSafeguards Document

Information disseminated

DateMethod of

disseminationKey issues

Subproject xxx RP/LARPSubproject yyy RCCDPEtc... IPP

Dissemination method such as handed out in public meeting, distributed house-to-house, posted in the public place etc.

B. Payment of compensation, allowances, and assistance viz civil works

1. Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) Process

Complete following table and discuss particulars in text

Table xx Updated Progress of Social Safeguards Implementation as of (Date, Month, Year)

SubprojectDMS

Payment of Compensation

Resettlement and site clearance Bid awarded

Start End Start End Start End

Subproject xxx Subproject yyyy etc

2. Progress of Payments for Compensation, Relocating AHs and Civil Works

This section covers two key areas as operationalized for this monitoring period: (i) compliance to payment of compensation and allowances - noting relocation, and (ii) the start

of civil works. The purpose of this section is to assess progress and readiness to hand-land

over for civil works as well as compliance with conditions for handing over. Complete table below and present key points for each subprojet in the text. Detil of progrees can be put in

the Appendix.

If any relocation cases, also provide information/description with regard to relocation issues such confirmation of relocation preferences, information regarding delays in completing

resettlement sites, including actions to be taken.

!

"#$!

!Ta

ble

xx

Su

mm

ary

of

Pro

gre

ss

Pa

ym

en

t fo

r C

om

pe

ns

ati

on

**,

Re

loc

ati

ng

AH

s**

* a

nd

Civ

il W

ork

s a

s o

f (D

ate

, M

on

th,

Ye

ar)

C.

Liv

elih

oo

d R

esto

ratio

n P

rog

ram

(L

RP

)

Re

sto

ratio

n a

nd

re

ha

bili

tatio

n a

pp

roa

ch

es m

ay v

ary

sig

nific

an

tly f

rom

vill

ag

e t

o v

illa

ge

. C

om

ple

te T

ab

le b

elo

wa

nd

de

scri

be

pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n t

o

ava

ilab

le l

ive

liho

od

re

sto

ratio

n a

nd

re

ha

bili

tatio

n p

rog

ram

s,

dis

ag

gre

ga

ted

by g

en

de

r a

nd

eth

nic

ity (

CC

). Y

ou

ma

y a

dd

co

lum

ns f

or

mo

re L

RP

ty

pe

s.

Ta

ble

xxxxx

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n t

o L

ive

lih

oo

d R

es

tora

tio

n a

nd

Re

ha

bil

ita

tio

n a

s o

f (D

ate

, M

on

th,

Ye

ar)

!

"#$!

!

Other Remarks on Livelihood Restoration

Please describe any issues encountered and approaches to resolve identified issues (if at

all).

D. Grievance redress

Provide a narrative summary of grievance cases by type of issue and location and how

grievances are resolved must be documented as these happen. Refer to the following table to present this section in text form. Detail list of complaint/grievances redress can be put in

the Appendix.

Table xxxxx.Summary of Complaint/Grievance Redress as of (Date, Month, Year)

Village/Sub Village Complaint/

Grievance Topic

Number of Grievances

Status of Grievances Follow up Action

Number Resolved

Number of On going

Remark

#Pending from Previous Reporting Period

New Grievances for The Reporting Period

# Total Grievances

Subproject xxx

Village 1

Village 2

etc

Subproject yyy

IV. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT TO SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS

A. Staff Support to Ensure Compliance

This section presents the involvement of social safeguards-related staff within PMU, PIU. All

focal persons will be listed along with contact details. include any issues specifically

addressed by management when engaging at the site level. Describe also, if any, capacity

development training provided: type and number of trainings, number of staff/officers trained (disaggregated by gender).

.

B. Funds Availability and Sourcing and Limitations to LARP Implementation

Describe here issues affecting timely land clearance or handover of land for civil works such

as grievances (including non-agreement to compensation), unresolved encumbrances,

funding constraints, other.]. Summarize the descriptions in the following table

!

"#%!

!

Table xxx Disbursement and Use of Funds as of (Date, Month, Year)

Sub Project/ Location

LARP/RPBudget

Requirement

Source of Funding

Funds Disbursed

this Reporting

Period

Specific LARP Activities Funded this Reporting Period

Cummulative Funds

DisbursementActivities Timeliness of Funds Disbursement (give

reason for delay)

V. Other Concerns and Notations

Provide information on other newly identified issues that impacting or relevant to theimplementation of LARP/RP. These may include resource constraints, changes in scope of

impacts, gender, contractor workforce etc.

VI. Outstanding Issues on Resettlement, Corresponding Plan of Action and Status

Under this section, provide information identified issues impacting the implementation of

social safeguards compliance and the way forward to overcome issues and concerns.Summaries can be in the form of following table.

Table xxxxOutstanding Issues and Corresponding Plans of Action as of (Date, Month, Year)

Subproject

Outstanding Issues and Concerns Follow Action/s

New/ CurrentPending from

previous monitoring reports

Action Responsible Institution Deadline

!

"#&!

!

APPENDICES

Appendix 1. Minutes of Consultations Conducted

Appendix 2 . List of Progress of Compensation Payment and Assistance

Appendix 3. List of Relocated AHs and Where they Relocate

Appendix 4. List of AHs Participation of LRP

Appendix 5. Detail List of Complaint/Grievances

Appendix 6. Photo-documentation for the Monitoring Period

(may add more necessary /relevant appendices)

!

"#'!

!

Appendix 1. Minutes of Consultation Conducted as of (Date, Month, Year) (see template

of MOM below)

MINUTES OF STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION

In this days........, date......, months....., year......, we are the undersigned1. Name..........representative of the Province and or District LG

2. Name ..........representative of the Subdistrict LG

3. Name.......... representative of the Village G

4. Name...........representative from the Project Proponent

5. Name ...........representative of the community

6. Name......... customary leader (if any)

7. Others (listed necessary participants)

Have carried out a public consultation for land acquisition and resettlement plan for project................located in (Subdistrict, District and Province).

The public consultation attended by relevant institutions from District LG (specify......), head of Sub district, Head of Village, Customary Leader, Community from villages surrounding project and other stakeholders (specify.........) (Attendance List are attached).

Summary of the discussions:

Topics (listed

relevant topic)

Opinion and Suggestion

GENERAL

Knowledge and information about project

Are they aware about the project; What information they have? How did they get information?

Mechanism of information distribution??

Including socialization hold during land acquisition and resettlement

Grievance Redress mechanism

Including GRM during land acquisition and resettlement

Etc.....

Project Impacts

Potential negative impacts

During planning stage

- Land acquisition and resettlement

- Loss of business/income

During construction stage

- Environmental: increasing of dust, noise etc.

- Asset affected by construction activities

- Customary issues

- Opportunity to work in project

- Gender.............

- Health......

After road construction (operational phase)

- Environmental: increasing of dust, noise etc.

- Customary issues

!

"#(!

!

Topics (listed

relevant topic)

Opinion and Suggestion

- Road safety

- Livelihood

- Gender.............

- Health......

Potential positive impacts

During planning stage

- Compensation for land and other affected assets

- Opportunity to work in project

During road construction

- Opportunity work in the project

- Road safety

- Livelihood

- Gender.............

- Health......

After road construction (operational phase)

- Environmental: increasing of dust, noise etc

- Customary issue

- Road safety

- Livelihood

- Gender.............

- Health......

Conclusion or Recommendation

Mechanism of information distribution

Suggestions on ensuring community surrounding project area are informed about the project.

Example: Socialization during village meeting? brochure put in the village office...etc.

Grievance redress mechanism

Suggested Procedures for Addressing Grievances

Potential Negative

How to minimize or avoid negative impact during and after road construction

Land Acquisition and Resettlement

Improvement of land acquisition and resettlement procedure

Etc............

Name Institutions/Stakeholder SignatureProvince Local Government

District LG

Representative of Sub District

LG

Village LG

Customary Leader

!

"##!

!

Representative of Community

etc.

Photograph of related stakeholder consultations

Photo 1 Photo 2

!

"#)!

!

Attendance List Stakeholder Consultation

Project :Date :Venue :

No Name Gender Ethnicity Institution Signature

M F

!

"#$!

!Ap

pe

nd

ix 2

. L

ist

of

Pro

gre

ss o

f C

om

pe

nsa

tio

n P

aym

en

t a

nd

Assis

tan

ce

as

of

(Da

te,

Mo

nth

, Y

ea

r)(s

ee

te

mp

late

ta

ble

be

low

)

Su

b P

roje

ct:

!"!#

#

Appendix 3. List of Relocated AHs and Where they Relocate as of (Date, Month, Year) (see

template table below)

Sub project

Name of

Relocated

AHs

Progress of Relocated AHs (check appropriate box below) Remarks

(specify adress of

relocated area or

reason of not

relocated yet)

Relocate in

place

Relocate to

different

Subdistrict

Relocate to

different

district

Relocate in

Different

Province

Not yet

Relocated

Village:......

Village:.......

Village:

Sub project:

Village:

etc

!"$#

#

Appendix 4. List of AHs Participation of LRP as of (Date, Month, Year) (see template table below)

Subproject:

Name of Eligible AH

LRP Program xxxx LRP Program yyyy You may add

columns for more LRP types.Name of

ProgramImplementation Date/Month

Name of Program

Implementation Date/Month

Village ........

Village....

Sub project:

Village .....

!"%#

#

Appendix 5. Detail List of Complaint/Grievances as of (Date, Month, Year) (see template table below)

Sub Project

Complaint/ Grievance Topic

Date Complaint Received

Location of

Complaint

Name of Aggrieved

AH

Address Status of Complaint/Grievance Redress

Resolved/Satisfied

Not satisfied

Follow up action

Sub Project:

Complaint/ Grievance Topic

Date Complaint Received

Location of

Complaint

Name of Aggrieved

AH

Address Status of Complaint/Grievance Redress

Resolved/Satisfied

Not satisfied

Follow up action

52316-001: Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and ...

Documents

Transcript of 52316-001: Emergency Assistance for Rehabilitation and ...