5.2 Planning Statement

Planning Act 2008

Revision: Date:

PINS Reference Number: Document Reference Number:

Lead Author:

5.2 Planning Statement

P l a n n i n g S t a t e m e n t

Meaford Energy Centre


Meaford Energy Centre


March 2015

MEAFORD ENERGY CENTRE u PLANNING STATEMENT

2

This Planning Statement was prepared on behalf of Meaford Energy Limited by:

__________________________________ Savills Wessex House Wimborne Dorset BH21 1PB __________________________________

PLANNING STATEMENT

pared on Limited by:

__________________________________

__________________________________

u SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION Meaford Energy Centre and Connections: background to the Purpose of this document The Applicant Location Main components of the Scheme Consultations Consenting requirements and policy considerations Structure of this Planning Statement 2. THE NEED FOR THE SCHEME: NATIONAL ENERGY Introduction National policy statement for energy Other national policy Conclusion 3. PLANNING POLICY Introduction National Planning Policy Framework Local policy Conclusion

MEAFORD ENERGY CENTRE

onnections: background to the Scheme

Scheme

nts and policy considerations

this Planning Statement

: NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY

l policy statement for energy

nal Planning Policy Framework


3

C o n t e n t s

7

13

13

15

16

16

17

22

22

25

27

27

27

32

34

35

35

35

36

39


4

4. ASSESSMENT Introduction Environmental Statement Habitats and Species Regulations (NPS EN Alternatives Good Design (NPS EN-1, 4.5 and EN- Consideration of Combined Heat and Power (NPS EN Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Carbon Capture Readiness (CCR) (NPS EN Climate Change Adaptation (NPS EN Grid connection (NPS EN-1, 4.9) Pollution control and other environmental regulatory regimes (NPS EN Safety (NPS EN-1, 4.11) Hazardous Substances (NPS EN-1, 4.12) Health (NPS EN-1, 4.13) Common law nuisance and statutory nuisance (NPS EN Security considerations (NPS EN-1, 4.15) Air quality and emissions (EN-2, 2.5) Biodiversity and geological conservation (EN Civil and military aviation and defence interests (EN Dust, odour, artificial light, smoke, steam and insect infestation (EN Flood risk (EN-1, 5.7) Historic environment (EN-1, 5.8) Landscape and Visual (EN-1, 5.9 and EN Land use including open space, green infrastructure and Green Belt (EN Noise and vibration (EN-2, 2.7)

PLANNING STATEMENT

ies Regulations (NPS EN-1, 4.3)

-2, 2.3.15-2.3.16)

Consideration of Combined Heat and Power (NPS EN-1, 4.6)

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Carbon Capture Readiness (CCR) (NPS EN-1, 4.7)

Climate Change Adaptation (NPS EN-1, 4.8)

Pollution control and other environmental regulatory regimes (NPS EN-1, 4.10)

1, 4.12)

Common law nuisance and statutory nuisance (NPS EN-1, 4.14)

1, 4.15)

2, 2.5)

rvation (EN-1, 5.3)

Civil and military aviation and defence interests (EN-1, 5.4)

Dust, odour, artificial light, smoke, steam and insect infestation (EN-1, 5.6)

1, 5.9 and EN-2, 2.6)

Land use including open space, green infrastructure and Green Belt (EN-1, 5.10 and EN

41

41

41

42

43

45

46

1, 4.7) 46

46

47

47

47

48

48

49

49

49

51

52

53

54

55

57

1, 5.10 and EN-2, 2.2) 58

59

Socio-economic (EN-1, 5.12) Traffic and transport (EN-1, 5.13) Waste management (EN-1, 5.14] Water quality and resources [NPS EN 5. CONCLUSIONS Policy compliance Consultation feedback and safeguards Likely benefits and disbenefits of the Overall conclusion u GLOSSARY


1, 5.13)

1, 5.14]

Water quality and resources [NPS EN-2, 2.10)

Consultation feedback and safeguards

Likely benefits and disbenefits of the Scheme


5

60

62

63

64

67

67

68

69

70

73


6

PLANNING STATEMENT

Overview of the Scheme and the Application S.1 Meaford Energy Limited

Act 2008 (as amendedcombined cycle gas turbineConnection and infrastructure works, all of which is or forms part of the significant infrastructure project’ constructed on land at Meaford Business Park (MBP)Staffordshire, and is known a

S.2 MEL is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and G

Both companies have an extensive background in the development and economic regeneration of sites throughout the UK, including experience in the energy sector.

S.3 The Scheme comprises

• a new CCGT Power • a new integral Electrical

the existing Barlaston substation• a new integral Gas

transmission system• alteration to the existing

Road’ that leads off Meaford Road• replacement, maintenance or refurbishment of existing surface water drainage and

construction and maintenance of• creation of temporary

operational and maintenance• landscaping and ecological mitigation;• security fences, gates and lighting

S.4 The Power Station Complex, the Electrical Connection and the Gas Connection will be

sited within and adjacent to the MBPBorough. The MBP Site occupies a lowTrent and Mersey Canal. stations (Meaford ‘A’ and Meaford

S.5 The Power Station Complex would be fuelled by natur

electrical output of up to 299 megawatts (MWexported to the National Grid via adjacent to the Power


Overview of the Scheme and the Application

Meaford Energy Limited (MEL) is applying to the Secretary of State as amended) (PA 2008) for powers to construct, operate and

combined cycle gas turbine Power Station Complex with a Gas Connection and onnection and infrastructure works, all of which is or forms part of the

significant infrastructure project’ that comprises the Scheme. The Scheme will be on land at Meaford Business Park (MBP), between Barlaston and Stone in

is known as the Meaford Energy Centre (MEC).

is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and GBoth companies have an extensive background in the development and economic regeneration of sites throughout the UK, including experience in the energy sector.

comprises:

ower Station Complex; lectrical Connection for the import and export of electricity from/to

the existing Barlaston substation; as Connection to connect the Power Station Complex to the

ystem (LTS) at an Above Ground Installation (AGI)alteration to the existing road access to the MBP known as the

off Meaford Road, and resurfacing of the Northern Access Roadreplacement, maintenance or refurbishment of existing surface water drainage and construction and maintenance of a surface water retention pond;

temporary construction Laydown Areas and operational and maintenance Laydown Area;

aping and ecological mitigation; fences, gates and lighting.

The Power Station Complex, the Electrical Connection and the Gas Connection will be sited within and adjacent to the MBP, within the administrative area of Stafford

ite occupies a low-lying position between the River Trent and the Trent and Mersey Canal. The MBP was occupied formerly by two coal

and Meaford ‘B’), now demolished.

omplex would be fuelled by natural gas and would have up to 299 megawatts (MWe). The electricity generated would be

exported to the National Grid via the existing Barlaston electricity subower Station Complex.


7

S u m m a r y

to the Secretary of State under the Planning operate and maintain a onnection and Electrical

onnection and infrastructure works, all of which is or forms part of the ‘nationally the Scheme. The Scheme will be

, between Barlaston and Stone in

is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and Glenfinnan Properties. Both companies have an extensive background in the development and economic regeneration of sites throughout the UK, including experience in the energy sector.

for the import and export of electricity from/to

to connect the Power Station Complex to the local gas (AGI);

known as the ‘Northern Access Northern Access Road;

replacement, maintenance or refurbishment of existing surface water drainage and a surface water retention pond;

reas and the creation of an

The Power Station Complex, the Electrical Connection and the Gas Connection will be the administrative area of Stafford

lying position between the River Trent and the The MBP was occupied formerly by two coal-fired power

al gas and would have a rated . The electricity generated would be

electricity sub-station located


8

S.6 The Scheme is classified as a nationally significant infrastructure project PA 2008. Accordingly, a Development Consent Order (DCOdevelopment of the Scheme.Station) Order ('the Order') based in Bristol. PINS will appoint an inspectorthe application on behalf of the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Cha

S.7 The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as

amended) (‘the EIA Regulationsbe carried out for the Schemethe environment by virtue of its nature, size or location. presented in an Environmental Statement (ES), which accompanies ES describes the likely significant environmental effects of the construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning. Where significant adverse effects on the environment are identified, the ES sets out prevented, reduced and, where possible, offset.

Purpose of this document S.8 The purpose of this Planning Statement is to

an explanation of the planning of how the Application addresses these. of relevant planning policies, plans, strategies and guidance, in order to examine the extent to which the Scheme

S.9 The Planning Statement is a part of a series of documents produced to accompany the

Application submitted in accordance with Section 55 of the PA 2008 and the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 (APFP Regulations). It should be read in conjunction with

• the Design and Access Statement (doc• the Environmental Statement• the Order (document reference

Scheme consultations S.10 Stakeholder consultations undertaken by

current proposals are described in a Consultation Report Following earlier rounds of nonexhibition, statutory consultation and publicity in accordance with of the PA 2008 took place in June and July 2014.

PLANNING STATEMENT

is classified as a nationally significant infrastructure project . Accordingly, a Development Consent Order (DCO) is required to authorise the

cheme. The Application for the Meaford Energy (Gas Fired PowStation) Order ('the Order') has been submitted to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS),

. PINS will appoint an inspector(s) to act as the examining authority forthe application on behalf of the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Cha

The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as EIA Regulations’) require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) t

be carried out for the Scheme on the basis that it is likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of its nature, size or location. The findings of the EIA presented in an Environmental Statement (ES), which accompanies the

kely significant environmental effects of the construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning. Where significant adverse effects on the environment are identified, the ES sets out the ways in which these will be

nd, where possible, offset.

The purpose of this Planning Statement is to act as the primary reference document for an explanation of the planning considerations pertinent to the Scheme and a description

pplication addresses these. In so doing, it describes the Schemeof relevant planning policies, plans, strategies and guidance, in order to examine the

Scheme would comply with identified requirements.

tatement is a part of a series of documents produced to accompany the pplication submitted in accordance with Section 55 of the PA 2008 and

the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations Regulations). It should be read in conjunction with:

the Design and Access Statement (document reference 5.3); the Environmental Statement main statement or "ES" (document reference

ument reference 3.1) ;

Stakeholder consultations undertaken by MEL during the design and assessmentcurrent proposals are described in a Consultation Report (document reference 5.1) Following earlier rounds of non-statutory consultation, which included a touring public exhibition, statutory consultation and publicity in accordance with Section

2008 took place in June and July 2014.

is classified as a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP) under the is required to authorise the

for the Meaford Energy (Gas Fired Power has been submitted to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS),

to act as the examining authority for the application on behalf of the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.

The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) to

on the basis that it is likely to have significant effects on The findings of the EIA are

the Application. The kely significant environmental effects of the Scheme during

construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning. Where significant adverse ways in which these will be

act as the primary reference document for pertinent to the Scheme and a description doing, it describes the Scheme in the light

of relevant planning policies, plans, strategies and guidance, in order to examine the would comply with identified requirements.

tatement is a part of a series of documents produced to accompany the pplication submitted in accordance with Section 55 of the PA 2008 and Regulation 5 of

the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations

ument reference 6.2); and

design and assessment of the (document reference 5.1)

included a touring public Sections 42, 47 and 48

S.11 The Consultation Report describes the feedback from these consultations and explaithe design of the Scheme was refined in response to representations. matters including landscape and visual effects, health, construction, transport and the implications for the wider socio

National energy policy

S.12 Chapter 2 of this Planning Statement considers the

energy policy. The national need for new gasexplicitly in national policy, including the Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy (EN-1), the National Policy Statement for Fossil(EN-2), the National Policy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructure and Gas and Oil Pipelines (EN-4), the Gas Generation Strategy 2012 and the National Infrastructure Plan 2014. Proposals such as the enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the transition to a low carbon economy.

National and local planning policy

S.13 Chapter 3 of this Planning Statement considers the

local planning policy. The National Planning Policy Framework concerning sustainable development, economic growth and employment, the use of brownfield land and envirit is considered to be a sustainable development.

S.14 The MEC would actively support the implementation of policies in the adopted Plan for

Stafford Borough 2014 concerning the economy, employment, the use of brownfield land and the regeneration of the also consistent with local plan policies concerning the natural environment and green infrastructure, nature conservation, landscape, the historic environment and the provision of infrastructure to support new commercial development.

Environmental policy

S.15 Chapter 4 of this Planning Statement employs the environmental information presented in

the ES (document reference 6.2)policy and guidance provided in relevant National Policy Statements. Wenvironmental mitigation inherent Requirements (in Schedule 2 of the proposal. In part, this reflects the circumstances of the brownfield land of generally low environmental and amenity value, with no public right of access. The Power Station provides a relatively self-sensitive receptors are generally remote from the vegetation will help to contain views of the


The Consultation Report describes the feedback from these consultations and explaicheme was refined in response to representations.

matters including landscape and visual effects, health, construction, transport and the implications for the wider socio-economic development of the locality.

of this Planning Statement considers the Scheme in the context of national energy policy. The national need for new gas-fired power generation is acknowledged explicitly in national policy, including the Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy

1), the National Policy Statement for Fossil-Fuel Electricity Generation Infrastructure 2), the National Policy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructure and Gas and Oil

4), the Gas Generation Strategy 2012 and the National Infrastructure Plan 2014. Proposals such as the MEC will help to replace aged power generation infrastructure, enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the transition to a low carbon

National and local planning policy

of this Planning Statement considers the Scheme in the context of national and local planning policy. The Scheme is found to be consistent with relevant provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework concerning sustainable development, economic growth and employment, the use of brownfield land and environmental protection. In these termsit is considered to be a sustainable development.

would actively support the implementation of policies in the adopted Plan for Stafford Borough 2014 concerning the economy, employment, the use of brownfield land and the regeneration of the MBP specifically, as provided for in local plan policy E5. It isalso consistent with local plan policies concerning the natural environment and green infrastructure, nature conservation, landscape, the historic environment and the provision of infrastructure to support new commercial development.

of this Planning Statement employs the environmental information presented in (document reference 6.2) to appraise the Scheme in the light of the topic

policy and guidance provided in relevant National Policy Statements. Wenvironmental mitigation inherent in the Scheme design or otherwise provided for in

(in Schedule 2 of the Order), it is concluded that the Schemeproposal. In part, this reflects the circumstances of the MBP Site brownfield land of generally low environmental and amenity value, with no public right of

tation Complex is located in the central area of the M-contained location in relation to local settlements

receptors are generally remote from the Scheme. In addition, lvegetation will help to contain views of the Power Station Complex.


9

The Consultation Report describes the feedback from these consultations and explains how cheme was refined in response to representations. Feedback highlighted

matters including landscape and visual effects, health, construction, transport and the economic development of the locality.

in the context of national fired power generation is acknowledged

explicitly in national policy, including the Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy el Electricity Generation Infrastructure

2), the National Policy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructure and Gas and Oil 4), the Gas Generation Strategy 2012 and the National Infrastructure Plan

o replace aged power generation infrastructure, enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the transition to a low carbon

context of national and is found to be consistent with relevant provisions of the

National Planning Policy Framework concerning sustainable development, economic growth onmental protection. In these terms,

would actively support the implementation of policies in the adopted Plan for Stafford Borough 2014 concerning the economy, employment, the use of brownfield land

specifically, as provided for in local plan policy E5. It is also consistent with local plan policies concerning the natural environment and green infrastructure, nature conservation, landscape, the historic environment and the provision

of this Planning Statement employs the environmental information presented in in the light of the topic-specific

policy and guidance provided in relevant National Policy Statements. With the design or otherwise provided for in

Scheme is a low impact Site - a large expanse of

brownfield land of generally low environmental and amenity value, with no public right of located in the central area of the MBP Site which

settlements and means that In addition, local terrain and


10

S.16 The ability to secure the required

Connection to the distribution networkextensive new infrastructureOther than for the AGI and the and Mersey Canal and the underground.

The need for and benefits of the Scheme S.17 Chapter 5 of this Planning Statement presents the overall conclusions of this analysis.

These are set in the context of Section 104 of the PA 2008, which requires the decision maker to consider whether the adverse impacts of the benefits.

S.18 The urgent need for energy generation, including gas fired generating stations

explained in NPS EN-1, the Gas Generation Strategy (DECC, 2012) and the National Infrastructure Plan (HM Treasury, 201those anticipated by relevant National Policy Statements. Fundamentally, the will help to meet the urgent national need for new efficient electricity generation capacity. CCGT power stations can provide power flexibly and reliably in response to demand from the network. In these terms they are complementary to intermittent sources of renewable energy and will support the transition to low carbon energy supply in the UK. The Scheme would contribute to the immediate and medium term needs for flexible, reliable, peak load power generation and facilitate the transition to a low carbon economy.

S.19 The construction and operation of the Scheme would benefit the local economy.

Chapter 6 of the ES main statement economic effects of the Scheme and finds that terms. No significant adverse socio

S.20 Additionally, at the local level

regeneration of a strategically significant brownfield site.attract the interest of other incoming occupiers to the regional, and national economic interest in this substantial.

S.21 The Scheme will be up to

procured from within the UK. The construction phase would lead to thejobs during the peak period of construction activity, or 220 jobs averaged over a 36 month construction period. The construction phase is anticipated to result in approximately £3.19m of direct gross value added (GVA). benefit is expected to generate £3m GVA and an employment income of £1.9m in the sub-region during construction. Once operational the

PLANNING STATEMENT

The ability to secure the required Gas Connection to the LTS distribution network within the MBP Site, without the need for

extensive new infrastructure, further substantiates the low impact nature of theOther than for the AGI and the 140 m section of overground gas that and Mersey Canal and the West Cost Mainline railway, these connections will be made

of the Scheme

of this Planning Statement presents the overall conclusions of this analysis. These are set in the context of Section 104 of the PA 2008, which requires the decision maker to consider whether the adverse impacts of the Scheme would outweigh the

The urgent need for energy generation, including gas fired generating stations1, the Gas Generation Strategy (DECC, 2012) and the National

Infrastructure Plan (HM Treasury, 2014). The benefits of the Schemethose anticipated by relevant National Policy Statements. Fundamentally, the will help to meet the urgent national need for new efficient electricity generation capacity. CCGT power stations can provide power flexibly and reliably in response to

emand from the network. In these terms they are complementary to intermittent sources of renewable energy and will support the transition to low carbon energy supply in the UK. The Scheme would contribute to the immediate and medium term needs for

le, reliable, peak load power generation and facilitate the transition to a low carbon

The construction and operation of the Scheme would benefit the local economy. main statement (document reference 6.2) considers

of the Scheme and finds that it would deliver positive adverse socio-economic effects are identified in the assessment.

t the local level, the Scheme would support the remediation and regeneration of a strategically significant brownfield site. The Scheme attract the interest of other incoming occupiers to the MBP Site. On balance

economic interest in this Scheme proceeding is considered to be

to a £300m investment, approximately half of which could be procured from within the UK. The construction phase would lead to thejobs during the peak period of construction activity, or 220 jobs averaged over a 36 month construction period. The construction phase is anticipated to result in approximately £3.19m of direct gross value added (GVA). The indirect employmbenefit is expected to generate £3m GVA and an employment income of £1.9m in the

region during construction. Once operational the MEC will provide

to the LTS and the Electrical without the need for

further substantiates the low impact nature of the Scheme. that will cross the Trent

hese connections will be made

of this Planning Statement presents the overall conclusions of this analysis. These are set in the context of Section 104 of the PA 2008, which requires the decision

would outweigh the

The urgent need for energy generation, including gas fired generating stations, is 1, the Gas Generation Strategy (DECC, 2012) and the National

Scheme also align with those anticipated by relevant National Policy Statements. Fundamentally, the Scheme will help to meet the urgent national need for new efficient electricity generation capacity. CCGT power stations can provide power flexibly and reliably in response to

emand from the network. In these terms they are complementary to intermittent sources of renewable energy and will support the transition to low carbon energy supply in the UK. The Scheme would contribute to the immediate and medium term needs for

le, reliable, peak load power generation and facilitate the transition to a low carbon

The construction and operation of the Scheme would benefit the local economy. considers the socio-

deliver positive benefits in these economic effects are identified in the assessment.

he remediation and Scheme should help to

On balance, the local, ceeding is considered to be

£300m investment, approximately half of which could be procured from within the UK. The construction phase would lead to the creation of 495 jobs during the peak period of construction activity, or 220 jobs averaged over a 36 month construction period. The construction phase is anticipated to result in

The indirect employment benefit is expected to generate £3m GVA and an employment income of £1.9m in the

will provide approximately 30

skilled jobs and is anticipated to result in approximately £1.45m of direct GVA annand between £0.6m and £2.2m of indirect GVA annually through the supply chain.

S.22 The land area of the Scheme

as a catalyst for the development of the MBP Site for employment uses in accowith the extant planning permission. The MBP will employment space for Staffordshire.

Planning Assessment

S.23 Section 104 of the PA 2008

Secretary of State must have regard to any relevant National Policy Statement and must decide applications in accordance with it unless the adverse would outweigh its benefits or in certain other limited circumstances).

S.24 As National Policy Statement EN

combined with the relevant technologyprovides the primary basis for decisions’‘should start with a presumption in favour of granting consent to applications for energy Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects’Policy Statements in the context of the

• National Policy Statement EN

Energy • National Policy Statement EN

Generating Infrastructure • National Policy Statement EN

Infrastructure • National Policy Statement EN

Infrastructure S.25 Paragraph 4.4.2 of NPS EN

consideration of alternatives, such as the obligation to include in thabout the main alternatives theyreasons for these choices, having taken into account the environmental, social and economic effects and including, where relevant, technical and comAccordingly, the ES main statement considered.

S.26 The potential for adverse impacts arising from a CCGT power station and its gas and

electricity connections is identified in Statements. These are describedThe overall conclusion of significant adverse environmental effects resultithat cannot be mitigatedof the Scheme, most notably the need for


skilled jobs and is anticipated to result in approximately £1.45m of direct GVA annand between £0.6m and £2.2m of indirect GVA annually through the supply chain.

land area of the Scheme is approximately 10% of the MBP Siteas a catalyst for the development of the MBP Site for employment uses in accowith the extant planning permission. The MBP will thus support the employment space for Staffordshire.

PA 2008 provides that, in making decisions on DCO applications, the of State must have regard to any relevant National Policy Statement and must

decide applications in accordance with it unless the adverse effectswould outweigh its benefits or in certain other limited circumstances).

Policy Statement EN-1 explains, ‘this National Policy Statement, when combined with the relevant technology-specific energy National Policy Statements, provides the primary basis for decisions’ (paragraph 1.1.1), and the Secretary of State

th a presumption in favour of granting consent to applications for energy Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects’ (paragraph 4.1.2). The relevant National Policy Statements in the context of the Scheme are:

National Policy Statement EN-1 - The Overarching National Policy Statement for

National Policy Statement EN-2- National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating Infrastructure National Policy Statement EN-4 - National Policy Statement for Gas Supply

nal Policy Statement EN-5 – National Policy Statement for Electricity Networks

4.4.2 of NPS EN-1 lists certain obligations on an applicant regarding the consideration of alternatives, such as the obligation to include in th

the main alternatives they have studied, which should include an indication of the reasons for these choices, having taken into account the environmental, social and economic effects and including, where relevant, technical and com

main statement (document reference 6.2) describes

The potential for adverse impacts arising from a CCGT power station and its gas and electricity connections is identified in general terms in relevant National Policy

. These are described in the ES main statement (document referenceoverall conclusion of the Environmental Statement is that there would be few

significant adverse environmental effects resulting from implementation of this Scannot be mitigated. When these residual effects are balanced against the benefits

most notably the need for new gas electricity generation, socio


11

skilled jobs and is anticipated to result in approximately £1.45m of direct GVA annually and between £0.6m and £2.2m of indirect GVA annually through the supply chain.

approximately 10% of the MBP Site. The Scheme will act as a catalyst for the development of the MBP Site for employment uses in accordance

support the delivery of improved

in making decisions on DCO applications, the of State must have regard to any relevant National Policy Statement and must

effects of the proposal would outweigh its benefits or in certain other limited circumstances).

, ‘this National Policy Statement, when specific energy National Policy Statements,

and the Secretary of State th a presumption in favour of granting consent to applications for energy

(paragraph 4.1.2). The relevant National

erarching National Policy Statement for

National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity

National Policy Statement for Gas Supply

National Policy Statement for Electricity Networks

applicant regarding the consideration of alternatives, such as the obligation to include in the ES information

have studied, which should include an indication of the reasons for these choices, having taken into account the environmental, social and economic effects and including, where relevant, technical and commercial feasibility.

describes the alternatives

The potential for adverse impacts arising from a CCGT power station and its gas and general terms in relevant National Policy

(document reference 6.2). tatement is that there would be few

ng from implementation of this Scheme ed against the benefits

gas electricity generation, socio-economic


12

benefits, land remediation and positive rof the Scheme are considered to be

S.27 The Scheme meets explicit objectives of national energy and planning policy and

development plan policy at the local level. There is clear new electricity generation capacity and in the large financial investment required to deliver this. At the local level the inward investment, physical regeneration and potential for industrial heat supply are all considered tbenefits. The proposed environmental and amenity safeguards should effects on local residents during construction and operation

S.28 In accordance with the considerations set out in

concluded that there are no adverse impacts sufficient to outweigh the identified benefits of the Scheme, and that there is a clear interest for the Order to be madeabsence of sufficient indications to the contrary

PLANNING STATEMENT

land remediation and positive re-use of brownfield land, the longconsidered to be positive.

The Scheme meets explicit objectives of national energy and planning policy and development plan policy at the local level. There is clear national interest in securing new electricity generation capacity and in the large financial investment required to

At the local level the inward investment, physical regeneration and potential for industrial heat supply are all considered to represent significant net benefits. The proposed environmental and amenity safeguards should

during construction and operation of the Scheme

In accordance with the considerations set out in Section 104 of concluded that there are no adverse impacts sufficient to outweigh the identified

, and that there is a clear and compelling Order to be made for the Scheme in the terms proposed

absence of sufficient indications to the contrary.

use of brownfield land, the long-term effects

The Scheme meets explicit objectives of national energy and planning policy and national interest in securing

new electricity generation capacity and in the large financial investment required to At the local level the inward investment, physical regeneration and

o represent significant net benefits. The proposed environmental and amenity safeguards should minimise the

of the Scheme.

104 of the PA 2008, it is concluded that there are no adverse impacts sufficient to outweigh the identified

compelling case in the public Scheme in the terms proposed and in an

MEAFORD ENERGY CENTRE AND CONNECTIONS: BACKGROUND TO THE 1.1. This statement is the Planning Statement for the

1.2. MEL is applying to the Secretary of State under the

operate and maintain a Meaford Business Park (MBP)Scheme is known as the Meaford Energy Centre (ME

1.3. MEL is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and Glenfinnan Properties. Both companies have an extensive background in the development and economic regeneration of sites throughout the UK, includin

1.4. The Scheme comprises:

• the CCGT Power Station Complex; • the Electrical Connection; • the Gas Connection; • Northern Access R • the temporary and permanent Laydown Areas; • foul and surface water drainage; • the potential for combined heat and power; • landscaping; • security; • lighting.

1.5 The Scheme will be sited within and adjacent to the MBP

Stone in Staffordshireoccupies a low-lying position between the River Trent and the Trent and Mersey Canal. The MBP was occupied formerly by two coalMeaford ‘B’), now demolished.


One u

MEAFORD ENERGY CENTRE AND CONNECTIONS: BACKGROUND TO THE SCHEME

is the Planning Statement for the Meaford Energy Centre (

MEL is applying to the Secretary of State under the PA 2008 for powers maintain a new combined cycle gas turbine power station

Meaford Business Park (MBP), between Barlaston and Stone in Staffordshire. The is known as the Meaford Energy Centre (MEC).

MEL is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and Glenfinnan Properties. Both companies have an extensive background in the development and economic regeneration of sites throughout the UK, including experience in the energy sector.

comprises:

CCGT Power Station Complex;

the Electrical Connection;

the Gas Connection;

Road;

the temporary and permanent Laydown Areas;

surface water drainage;

combined heat and power;

will be sited within and adjacent to the MBP Site between Barlaston and Stone in Staffordshire in the administrative area of Stafford Borough.

lying position between the River Trent and the Trent and Mersey Canal. The MBP was occupied formerly by two coal-fired power stations

, now demolished.


13

u Introduction

SCHEME

Meaford Energy Centre (‘the Scheme’).

for powers to construct, power station on land within

, between Barlaston and Stone in Staffordshire. The

MEL is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and Glenfinnan Properties. Both companies have an extensive background in the development and economic

g experience in the energy sector.

between Barlaston and in the administrative area of Stafford Borough. The MBP Site

lying position between the River Trent and the Trent and Mersey Canal. fired power stations (Meaford ‘A’ and


14

1.6 The location of the Scheme is shown on the Land Plan (document reference various components that comprise the Scheme are shown on the Works(document reference 2.3).

1.7 The Power Station Complex would be fuelled by natural gas and wou

electrical output of up to 299 megawatts (MWexported to the National Grid via adjacent to the Power Station Distribution (WPD). It previously supported the power stations which had

1.8 To function, the Power Station Complex requires the Electrical Connection.

Station Complex’s output would be exported into underground cables. WPD has confirmed that its existing infrastructure can accommodate the Electrical Connection without the need for new 132 kV lines or significant network reinforcement. MEL is therefore taking the Electrical Connection up to the point of connection

1.9 The Power Station Complex also requires

Complex will need to obtain gas from National Grid’s gas network, the National Transmission System (NTS). The connection point will be on the LTS which is supplied from the NTS. The Gas Connection will be made(AGI), shown on the Works Plans (document reference alone facility adjacent to the underground connection point to the gas main (see Chapter 4 of the ES - document reference the railway and canal, using existing bridges were employed previously to convey ash from the former Meaford stations.

1.10 There is a considerable national need

policy. A further explanation of the need for the Scheme is set out in Planning Statement but some examples of relevant policy include:

• Paragraph 3.3.1 of National Policy Stateme

states ‘the government believes there is an urgent need for new electricity NSIPs

• Paragraph 3.6.1 of NPS ENrole in providing reliable electricity to changes in supply and demand, and provide diversity in out energy mix

• Paragraph 1.40 of the National Infrastructure Plan (HM Treasury, December 201which states ‘new (unabated) gas plant is [alsoa backup for less flexible renewable generation and ensuring that the system can meet peak electricity demand

PLANNING STATEMENT

The location of the Scheme is shown on the Land Plan (document reference various components that comprise the Scheme are shown on the Works

).

omplex would be fuelled by natural gas and wouup to 299 megawatts (MWe). The electricity generated would be

exported to the National Grid via the existing Barlaston electricity subtation Complex. This sub-station is operated by previously supported the former Meaford ‘A

which had a total generation capacity of c. 500 MW

To function, the Power Station Complex requires the Electrical Connection. utput would be exported into WPD’s Barlaston substatio

underground cables. WPD has confirmed that its existing infrastructure can Electrical Connection without the need for new 132 kV lines or

significant network reinforcement. MEL is therefore taking the Electrical Connection up to the point of connection at WPD's Barlaston sub-station.

The Power Station Complex also requires a reliable source of fuel. Complex will need to obtain gas from National Grid’s gas network, the National Transmission System (NTS). The connection point will be on the LTS which is supplied from the NTS. The Gas Connection will be made in a secure Above-Ground Installation (AGI), shown on the Works Plans (document reference 2.3). The AGI would be a standalone facility adjacent to the underground connection point to the gas main (see Chapter

document reference 6.2.4). The Gas Connection pipelinethe railway and canal, using existing bridges (Canal Bridge 101 and Rail Bridge 104)

previously to convey ash from the former Meaford

national need for the Scheme, acknowledged policy. A further explanation of the need for the Scheme is set out in Planning Statement but some examples of relevant policy include:

Paragraph 3.3.1 of National Policy Statement (NPS) EN-1 (DECC, July 2011) which the government believes there is an urgent need for new electricity NSIPs

3.6.1 of NPS EN-1, which states that ‘Fossil fuel power stations play a vital role in providing reliable electricity supplies: they can be operated flexibly in response to changes in supply and demand, and provide diversity in out energy mix

1.40 of the National Infrastructure Plan (HM Treasury, December 201ew (unabated) gas plant is [also] needed and will be vital in supplying

a backup for less flexible renewable generation and ensuring that the system can meet peak electricity demand’.

The location of the Scheme is shown on the Land Plan (document reference 2.2) and the various components that comprise the Scheme are shown on the Works Plans

omplex would be fuelled by natural gas and would have a rated . The electricity generated would be

electricity sub-station located is operated by Western Power

A’ and Meaford ‘B’

To function, the Power Station Complex requires the Electrical Connection. The Power arlaston substation via

underground cables. WPD has confirmed that its existing infrastructure can Electrical Connection without the need for new 132 kV lines or

significant network reinforcement. MEL is therefore taking the Electrical Connection up

a reliable source of fuel. The Power Station Complex will need to obtain gas from National Grid’s gas network, the National Transmission System (NTS). The connection point will be on the LTS which is supplied

Ground Installation The AGI would be a stand-

alone facility adjacent to the underground connection point to the gas main (see Chapter line would pass above

(Canal Bridge 101 and Rail Bridge 104) that previously to convey ash from the former Meaford ‘A’ and ‘B’ power

for the Scheme, acknowledged in government policy. A further explanation of the need for the Scheme is set out in Chapter 2 of this

1 (DECC, July 2011) which the government believes there is an urgent need for new electricity NSIPs’

stations play a vital supplies: they can be operated flexibly in response

to changes in supply and demand, and provide diversity in out energy mix’.

1.40 of the National Infrastructure Plan (HM Treasury, December 2014), ] needed and will be vital in supplying

a backup for less flexible renewable generation and ensuring that the system can

1.11 The Scheme is classified as a of s.14(1)(a) and s.15 ofonshore generating station in England and Wales of 50 megawatts (MWmore. Under s.31 of the 2008required to develop an NSIP.application for it is made to the Secretary of State

1.12 This Application has been submitted to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS), based in Bristol,

which will examine the Climate Change. The Application seeks powers of compulsory acquisition of rights andthe imposition of restrictions. No land is being compulsorily acquired. The justification for the powers of compulsory acquisition is set out in the Statement of Reasons (document reference 4.1

1.13 The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact

amended) (EIA Regulationscarried out for the Schemeenvironment by virtue of its nature, size or lopresented in an ES main statementApplication. The ES describes the likely significant environmental effects of during construction, operationadverse effects on the environment are identified, the ES sets out ways in which these will be prevented, redu

PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT

1.14 The purpose of this Planning Statement is to

an explanation of the planning of how the Application the Scheme in the light of relevant planning policies, plans, strategies and guidance, in order to examine the extent to which the Scheme would comply with identified requirements.

1.15 The Planning Statement

Application submitted in accordance with Section 55 of the the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 (APFP Regulations). in the Application which set out design features, mitigation, or other commitments that address relevant planning issues

• the Design and Access Statement• the Environmental Statement • the Order (document reference


is classified as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Ps.14(1)(a) and s.15 of the PA 2008. The Act includes in the definition of an NSIP any

onshore generating station in England and Wales of 50 megawatts (MWUnder s.31 of the 2008 Act a Development Consent Order

develop an NSIP. Under s.37 of the 2008 Act, this can only be granted if an application for it is made to the Secretary of State.

pplication has been submitted to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS), based in Bristol, which will examine the Application on behalf of the Secretary of State for Energy and

The Application seeks powers of compulsory acquisition of rights andthe imposition of restrictions. No land is being compulsorily acquired. The justification for the powers of compulsory acquisition is set out in the Statement of Reasons

4.1).

The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as (EIA Regulations) require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) t

carried out for the Scheme on the basis that it is likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of its nature, size or location. The findings of the EIA

main statement (document reference 6.2), which accompanies describes the likely significant environmental effects of

during construction, operation, maintenance and decommissioning. Where significant adverse effects on the environment are identified, the ES sets out ways in which these will be prevented, reduced and, where possible, offset.

The purpose of this Planning Statement is to act as the primary reference document for an explanation of the planning considerations pertinent to the Scheme and a description

pplication responds to these. In so doing, the Planning Statementthe Scheme in the light of relevant planning policies, plans, strategies and guidance, in order to examine the extent to which the Scheme would comply with identified

The Planning Statement is a part of a series of documents produced to accompany the pplication submitted in accordance with Section 55 of the PA 2008

the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 (APFP Regulations). It should be read in conjunction with the following documents in the Application which set out design features, mitigation, or other commitments that address relevant planning issues:

Design and Access Statement (document reference 5.3): the Environmental Statement (document references 6.1-6.4):

ument reference 3.1) including its Schedule 2 (Requirements


15

Project (NSIP) by virtue includes in the definition of an NSIP any

onshore generating station in England and Wales of 50 megawatts (MWe) capacity or rder (DCO or ‘the Order’) is

, this can only be granted if an

pplication has been submitted to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS), based in Bristol, pplication on behalf of the Secretary of State for Energy and

The Application seeks powers of compulsory acquisition of rights and the imposition of restrictions. No land is being compulsorily acquired. The justification for the powers of compulsory acquisition is set out in the Statement of Reasons

Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) to be

on the basis that it is likely to have significant effects on the he findings of the EIA are

, which accompanies the describes the likely significant environmental effects of the Scheme

decommissioning. Where significant adverse effects on the environment are identified, the ES sets out ways in which these

act as the primary reference document for pertinent to the Scheme and a description

the Planning Statement reviews the Scheme in the light of relevant planning policies, plans, strategies and guidance, in order to examine the extent to which the Scheme would comply with identified

of documents produced to accompany the PA 2008 and Regulation 5 of

the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations the following documents

in the Application which set out design features, mitigation, or other commitments that

equirements).


16

1.16 A glossary of acronyms and defined terms is provided in the Glossary appended to this Planning Statement.

1.17 To assist the Secretary of

Planning Statement considers the likely benefits and disbenefits of the Scheme. 1.18 This Planning Statement concludes as to the overall acceptability of the Application in

accordance with the decision making framework established in s. 104 of the

THE APPLICANT 1.19 The applicant for the Scheme is MEL, registered in England (Company Number

08575649). MEL is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and Glenfinnan Properties to develop the Schemedevelopment and economic regeneration of sites throughout the UK, including experience in the energy sector.

1.20 Further information on MEL is avai

energy.com/) 1.21 The Scheme is being managed by MEL and

consultants comprising:

• Atkins - engineering design and environmental consultants;• Savills - town planning and • Pinsent Masons LLP - • Local Dialogue - community and stakeholder relations consultants.

1.22 MEL has undertaken its own land referencing. 1.23 The team was tasked with developing the MEC proposals in dialogue with Stafford

Borough Council, Staffordshire County Council, community, landowners and other interested parties including relevant statutory bodiewith the aim of securing a DCO for the by Savills.

LOCATION

1.24 The MEC Site is located mainly within the MBP Site

Stone in Staffordshire. The Trent and the Trent and Mersey Canal. land slopes down to the main central area of the areas of levelled land with excavations and stockpiles of soil and rubble associated with the demolition of the former

PLANNING STATEMENT

A glossary of acronyms and defined terms is provided in the Glossary appended to this

To assist the Secretary of State's decision making in relation to NPS ENPlanning Statement considers the likely benefits and disbenefits of the Scheme.

This Planning Statement concludes as to the overall acceptability of the Application in ecision making framework established in s. 104 of the

The applicant for the Scheme is MEL, registered in England (Company Number MEL is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and Glenfinnan

to develop the Scheme. Both companies have an extensive background in the development and economic regeneration of sites throughout the UK, including experience in the energy sector.

Further information on MEL is available on the Scheme website (http://www.meaford

The Scheme is being managed by MEL and MEL has employed a project team

engineering design and environmental consultants; town planning and property consultants;

solicitors; community and stakeholder relations consultants.

MEL has undertaken its own land referencing.

The team was tasked with developing the MEC proposals in dialogue with Stafford Borough Council, Staffordshire County Council, other relevant local authorities, community, landowners and other interested parties including relevant statutory bodie

of securing a DCO for the Scheme. This Planning Statement was produced

is located mainly within the MBP Site, which lies between Barlaston and The MBP Site occupies a low-lying position between the River

Trent and the Trent and Mersey Canal. From its southern and eastern boundaries the land slopes down to the main central area of the MEC Site, which contains extensive areas of levelled land with excavations and stockpiles of soil and rubble associated with the demolition of the former Meaford ‘A’ and Meaford ‘B’ power stations. Parts of the

A glossary of acronyms and defined terms is provided in the Glossary appended to this

State's decision making in relation to NPS EN-1 4.1.3, this Planning Statement considers the likely benefits and disbenefits of the Scheme.

This Planning Statement concludes as to the overall acceptability of the Application in ecision making framework established in s. 104 of the PA 2008.

The applicant for the Scheme is MEL, registered in England (Company Number MEL is a joint venture company established by St. Modwen and Glenfinnan

. Both companies have an extensive background in the development and economic regeneration of sites throughout the UK, including

http://www.meaford-

MEL has employed a project team of external

community and stakeholder relations consultants.

The team was tasked with developing the MEC proposals in dialogue with Stafford other relevant local authorities, the local

community, landowners and other interested parties including relevant statutory bodies, This Planning Statement was produced

between Barlaston and lying position between the River

southern and eastern boundaries the which contains extensive

areas of levelled land with excavations and stockpiles of soil and rubble associated with power stations. Parts of the

http://www.meaford

http://www.meaford

southern and north eastern areas of the and the eastern and western site boundaries benefit from mature tree growth, with the remainder sparsely vegetated with extensive areas of concrete or demolition rubble.

1.25 At the northern end of the MBP

club, both of which were associated with the original Meaford 'A' and 'B' power station development and remain in use today. Road access is gained currently from Meaford Road at the north-western corner of the Access Road. Another former access from Meaford Road adjacent to Barlaston substation is gated and disused.

1.26 Meaford Road forms the western boundary of the MBP

Road the River Trent follows a meandering course across its flood plain on the valley floor. The Trent and Mersey Canal runs along the eastern boundary of the MBP much of its length, and the West Coast Mainon the eastern side of the

1.27 The surrounding landscape predominantly

localised woodland blockswest of the MBP Sitesouth-west and a cluster of houses along the A34 to the northproperties include Meaford Hall and Meaford Farm, respectively to the south and southeast of the MEC Site

1.28 The Order Limits for the

MBP Site. The Order Limit MAIN COMPONENTS OF THE PROPOSED 1.29 The proposed Meaford Energy Centre

• the CCGT Power Station Complex; • the Electrical Connection; • the Gas Connection; • Northern Access R • the temporary and permanent Laydown Areas; • foul and surface water drainage; • the potential for combined heat and


southern and north eastern areas of the MBP Site are well vegetated with mature trees, and the eastern and western site boundaries benefit from mature tree growth, with the remainder sparsely vegetated with extensive areas of concrete or demolition rubble.

At the northern end of the MBP Site is a small group of red-brick buildings and a bowling club, both of which were associated with the original Meaford 'A' and 'B' power station development and remain in use today. Road access is gained currently from Meaford

western corner of the MBP site. This access is known as the Northern . Another former access from Meaford Road adjacent to Barlaston sub

station is gated and disused.

Meaford Road forms the western boundary of the MBP Site. To the west of Meaford er Trent follows a meandering course across its flood plain on the valley

The Trent and Mersey Canal runs along the eastern boundary of the MBP much of its length, and the West Coast Mainline railway follows a generally parallel route

he eastern side of the Canal.

The surrounding landscape predominantly comprises undulating agricultural land with localised woodland blocks. Barlaston Golf Course is situated immediately to the north

Site. The closest settlements include the village of Meaford to the west and a cluster of houses along the A34 to the north

properties include Meaford Hall and Meaford Farm, respectively to the south and south

for the Application encloses an area of land in the central part of the . The Order Limits comprise an area 16.6 ha.

MAIN COMPONENTS OF THE PROPOSED SCHEME

The proposed Meaford Energy Centre comprises the following integral components:

CCGT Power Station Complex;

the Electrical Connection;

the Gas Connection;

Road;

the temporary and permanent Laydown Areas;

foul and surface water drainage;

combined heat and power;


17

ll vegetated with mature trees, and the eastern and western site boundaries benefit from mature tree growth, with the remainder sparsely vegetated with extensive areas of concrete or demolition rubble.

brick buildings and a bowling club, both of which were associated with the original Meaford 'A' and 'B' power station development and remain in use today. Road access is gained currently from Meaford

known as the Northern . Another former access from Meaford Road adjacent to Barlaston sub-

ite. To the west of Meaford er Trent follows a meandering course across its flood plain on the valley

The Trent and Mersey Canal runs along the eastern boundary of the MBP Site for ine railway follows a generally parallel route

undulating agricultural land with Barlaston Golf Course is situated immediately to the north-

The closest settlements include the village of Meaford to the west and a cluster of houses along the A34 to the north-west. Individual

properties include Meaford Hall and Meaford Farm, respectively to the south and south-

pplication encloses an area of land in the central part of the

integral components:


18

• landscaping; • security; and • lighting.

1.30 Table 1.1 below reproduces the maximum physical dimensions of built elements in theScheme, and a description of the principal elements follows. A definitive description of the Scheme can be found Environmental Statementindividual built elements identified in table 1.1 are identified in (document reference 2.3).

Table 1.1: Maximum physical dimensions of the principalbuilt elements of the Meaford Energy C

Reference Name

1 Gas turbine building(part of Work No. 1A)

2 HRSG building of Work No. 1A)

3 Stack(s) (part of Work No. 1A)

4 Transformer(s) compound (part of Work No. 1D)

5 Steam turbine building (part of Work No. 1A)

6 Transformer compound (part of Work No. 1D )

7 Switchgear room (part of Work No. 1A)

8 132 kV switchyard (part of Work No. 1D)

9 Air cooled condenser (part of Work No. 1A)

PLANNING STATEMENT

below reproduces the maximum physical dimensions of built elements in the, and a description of the principal elements follows. A definitive description of

can be found in the Order (document reference 3.1) and Environmental Statement main statement (document ref 6.2). The positions of the individual built elements identified in table 1.1 are identified in (document reference 2.3).

Table 1.1: Maximum physical dimensions of the principal elements of the Meaford Energy Centre with all heights measured from 99m AOD

Name Number Height (m)

Length (m)

Gas turbine (part of

Work No. 1A) 1 25 60

building (part of Work No. 1A) 1 to 2 35 25

(part of Work No. 1A) 1 to 2 50 -

(s) (part of

Work No. 1D) 1 to 2 8 15

Steam turbine building (part of Work No. 1A)

1 21 45

(part of

Work No. 1D ) 1 8 15

Switchgear room (part of Work No. 1 5 15

132 kV switchyard (part of Work No. 1 10 72

condenser (part of Work No. 1A)

1 26 48

below reproduces the maximum physical dimensions of built elements in the , and a description of the principal elements follows. A definitive description of

) and Chapter 4 of the The positions of the

individual built elements identified in table 1.1 are identified in the Works Plans

with all heights measured from 99m AOD

Width (m)

Diameter (m)

45 -

13 -

- 6.5

10 -

26 -

15 -

10 -

42 -

48 -

Reference Name

10 Administration control building (part of Work No. 1C)

11 Pressure regulating installation (part of Work No.

12 Raw/fire wstorage tank (part of Work No. 1B)

13 Water storage tank(s) (part of Work No. 1B)

14 Water treatment system (part of Work No. 1B)

15 Workshop (part of Work No. 1B)

16 Parking (part of Work No. 1E)

17 Heat network interface (part of Work No. 1C)

NA Site road (part of Work No. 1E)

NA Perimeter f(part of Work No. 1E)

NA Above ground installation (Work No. 2A) measured from existing ground level

The Power Station Complex 1.31 A Power Station Complex

generate electricity. In the gas turbine, air is compressed and passed into a combustion


Name

Number Height (m)

Length (m)

Administration and building

(part of Work No. 1 10 20

Pressure regulating installation (part of Work No. 1B )

1 5 35

Raw/fire water tank (part

of Work No. 1B) 1 20 -

storage (part of

Work No. 1B) 1 to 2 20 -

Water treatment system (part of Work No. 1B)

1 10 20

Workshop (part of Work No. 1B) 1 10 30

Parking (part of Work No. 1E) Up to 20 - 33

Heat network interface building (part of Work No. 1 15 30

Site road (part of Work No. 1E) - - -

Perimeter fencing (part of Work No. - 2.5 -

Above ground installation (Work No. 2A) measured from existing ground

1 2.5 13

Power Station Complex uses an efficient combination of gas and steam turbines to generate electricity. In the gas turbine, air is compressed and passed into a combustion


19

Length (m) Width (m)

Diameter (m)

10 -

25 -

- 15

- 5

25 -

20 -

28 -

20 -

- -

- -

13 -

uses an efficient combination of gas and steam turbines to generate electricity. In the gas turbine, air is compressed and passed into a combustion


20

chamber where it is mixed with natural gas fuel to produce hot combustion gases at higpressure. This thermal and pressure energy is converted to mechanical energy by expanding the combustion gas through the gas turbine and air compressor. The turbine is connected to a generator that produces electrical power. The hot exhaust gases from the gas turbine are passed to an unfired boiler (usually referred to as a heat recovery steam generator or HRSG) to produce steam. This steam is in turn passed through a steam turbine to drive another generator to produce more electrical power.

1.32 The detailed engineering design for the best available capacity and efficiency combinations has yet to be determined. Therefore, consideration various configurations for the parameters of the power plant. The turbines and up to two HRSGs, one steam turbine, and a generator for each turbine. It could equally comprise a single larger gas turbine, one HRSG, one steam turbine and two separate generators.

1.33 Other components essential to the CCGT • Heat recovery steam generator (HRSG)

for the recovery of heat and production of steam from the gas turbine exhaust for further electricity generation.

• Stack: Each HRSG has its own exhaust flue contained within a would be either one or two, with continuous emissions monitoring installed.

• Cooling system: A dry airomitted from the steam turbine

• Water treatment plantwater.

• Switchgear: This component is essential to export electrical energy produced by the Power Station Complexlocated next to the Power Station Complexthe WPD 132kV network via underground cables Station Complex to the Barlaston substation.

• Surface water drainagea piped system via a retention pond and controlwithin a private network; ultimately discharging via a 450mm diameter pipe into the River Trent.

PLANNING STATEMENT

chamber where it is mixed with natural gas fuel to produce hot combustion gases at higpressure. This thermal and pressure energy is converted to mechanical energy by expanding the combustion gas through the gas turbine and air compressor. The turbine is connected to a generator that produces electrical power. The hot exhaust

m the gas turbine are passed to an unfired boiler (usually referred to as a heat recovery steam generator or HRSG) to produce steam. This steam is in turn passed through a steam turbine to drive another generator to produce more electrical power.

detailed engineering design for the best available capacity and efficiency combinations has yet to be determined. Therefore, consideration

configurations for the Power Station Complex within the ower plant. The Power Station Complex might consist of two gas

turbines and up to two HRSGs, one steam turbine, and a generator for each turbine. It could equally comprise a single larger gas turbine, one HRSG, one steam turbine and two

Other components essential to the CCGT Power Station Complex include:

Heat recovery steam generator (HRSG): as noted each gas turbine requires a HRSG for the recovery of heat and production of steam from the gas turbine exhaust for

electricity generation.

Each HRSG has its own exhaust flue contained within a Stack, of which there be either one or two, with continuous emissions monitoring

: A dry air-cooled condenser will be required to condense steam steam turbine.

Water treatment plant: This is required to provide demineralised water and process

: This component is essential to export electrical energy produced by the Power Station Complex. WPD operates an existing 132kV Barlaston substation

Power Station Complex. The switchyard will export electricity to 132kV network via underground cables of up to 200m from the

to the Barlaston substation.

Surface water drainage: All run-off from impermeable areas woulda piped system via a retention pond and controlled outfall into an existing manhole within a private network; ultimately discharging via a 450mm diameter pipe into the

chamber where it is mixed with natural gas fuel to produce hot combustion gases at high pressure. This thermal and pressure energy is converted to mechanical energy by expanding the combustion gas through the gas turbine and air compressor. The gas turbine is connected to a generator that produces electrical power. The hot exhaust

m the gas turbine are passed to an unfired boiler (usually referred to as a heat recovery steam generator or HRSG) to produce steam. This steam is in turn passed through a steam turbine to drive another generator to produce more electrical power.

detailed engineering design for the best available capacity and efficiency combinations has yet to be determined. Therefore, consideration has been given to

within the maximum design might consist of two gas

turbines and up to two HRSGs, one steam turbine, and a generator for each turbine. It could equally comprise a single larger gas turbine, one HRSG, one steam turbine and two

omplex include:

ach gas turbine requires a HRSG for the recovery of heat and production of steam from the gas turbine exhaust for

tack, of which there be either one or two, with continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) devices

ed to condense steam

: This is required to provide demineralised water and process

: This component is essential to export electrical energy produced by the D operates an existing 132kV Barlaston substation

will export electricity to of up to 200m from the Power

would be drained using outfall into an existing manhole

within a private network; ultimately discharging via a 450mm diameter pipe into the

• Foul water drainageexisting Severn Trent manhole (STW 2602) approximately 1.8km to the southMEC Site or alternatively, if installed, could be connected to the MBP system

• Internal site roads and parkingrequired to allow the movement of staff, maintenance vehicles and emergency vehicles. Up to 20 car parking spaces the southern part ofacilities.

• Security fencing: Security fencing of up to perimeter of the Power Station Complex

• Lighting: external lighting and lighting of the perimeter fence.

Electrical Connection 1.34 The Power Station Complex

underground cables running to the Barlaston substationproposed Power Station Complex.

1.35 The connections into the WPD network will be designed to enable a single generator

circuit to be shut down forremaining connections.

Gas Connection 1.36 The Power Station Complex

NTS. The proposed connection point the NTS. The consideration of the Power Station Complex established network in the area.

1.37 The Gas Connection will be made

east of the Trent and Mersey Cfor the deposit of pulverised fuel ash from the comprises a 13 x 13 mmetres.


water drainage: Any foul water from the Scheme wouldexisting Severn Trent manhole (STW 2602) approximately 1.8km to the south

or alternatively, if installed, could be connected to the MBP system

site roads and parking: Within the Power Station Complex, required to allow the movement of staff, maintenance vehicles and emergency

Up to 20 car parking spaces for operational staff wouldthe southern part of the Power Station Complex to enable easy access to the

: Security fencing of up to 2.5 m in height is proposed along the Power Station Complex.

xternal lighting would comprise street lights for roads within and lighting of the perimeter fence.

Complex’s output would be exported into WPDunderground cables running to the Barlaston substation, immediately to the west of the

Power Station Complex.

The connections into the WPD network will be designed to enable a single generator circuit to be shut down for maintenance without affecting the operation of the remaining connections.

Complex will need to obtain gas from National Grid’s gas network, the connection point is on the lower pressure LTS which is supplied from

The consideration of the Gas Connection has taken account of the demand of Complex and maximum capacity and pressure available from the

network in the area.

onnection will be made adjacent to a secure AGI, to be located on land to the Trent and Mersey Canal and the West Coast Mainline

for the deposit of pulverised fuel ash from the former coal-fired power stationsmetre compound, secured by fencing with a maximum height of 2.5


21

would be pumped into an existing Severn Trent manhole (STW 2602) approximately 1.8km to the south of the

or alternatively, if installed, could be connected to the MBP system.

omplex, service roads are required to allow the movement of staff, maintenance vehicles and emergency

would be provided within omplex to enable easy access to the

.5 m in height is proposed along the

comprise street lights for roads within the MEC Site

be exported into WPD's 132 kV network via immediately to the west of the

The connections into the WPD network will be designed to enable a single generator maintenance without affecting the operation of the

will need to obtain gas from National Grid’s gas network, the on the lower pressure LTS which is supplied from

onnection has taken account of the demand of and pressure available from the

to be located on land to the the West Coast Mainline railway, used formerly

fired power stations. This fencing with a maximum height of 2.5


22

CONSULTATIONS 1.38 Stakeholder consultations undertaken by

current proposals are described in a Consultation ReportFollowing earlier rounds of exhibition, statutory consultation anof the PA 2008 took place in June and July 2014.

1.39 The Consultation Report describes the feedback from these consultations and explains

how the design of the Scheme was refined in response to representations. 1.40 Feedback highlighted matters

construction, transport and the of the locality.

CONSENTING REQUIREMENTS AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Development Consent Orders 1.41 Because the generation capacity o

Scheme is classed as a NSIP, which requires Development consent for an NSIP can only be granted by a (DCO).

1.42 Applications for a DCO are required by

PA 2008, the Infrastructure Planning (ApplicationsRegulations 2009 (‘the APFP RegulationsRegulations.

1.43 The PA 2008 sets out the legal framework for the application, examination and

determination process for an NSIP. Under these provisions, an applicant submits an application for a DCO to PINS, follrefinement informed by public consultations. PINSthe Examining Authority who whether a DCO should be made or not. The this case, the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.

1.44 Section 104 paragraph (2) of the

‘In deciding the application the Panel or Council must have regard to a). Any national policy

description to which the application relates (a statement’),

PLANNING STATEMENT

Stakeholder consultations undertaken by MEL during the design and assessmentcurrent proposals are described in a Consultation Report (document refFollowing earlier rounds of non-statutory consultation that included a touring public

consultation and publicity in accordance with Sectiontook place in June and July 2014.

eport describes the feedback from these consultations and explains cheme was refined in response to representations.

highlighted matters including landscape and visual and the implications for the wider socio-economic development

MENTS AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS

generation capacity of the Power Station Complex will exceed 50MWe,classed as a NSIP, which requires development consent under the

for an NSIP can only be granted by a Development

Applications for a DCO are required by primary and secondary legislation includingtructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure)

APFP Regulations’) and the Environmental Impact Assessment

sets out the legal framework for the application, examination and determination process for an NSIP. Under these provisions, an applicant submits an application for a DCO to PINS, following an integrated process of EIA and design refinement informed by public consultations. PINS appoints an Inspector(s) who acts as the Examining Authority who makes a recommendation to the Secretary of State on whether a DCO should be made or not. The final decision is made by the minister

case, the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.

Section 104 paragraph (2) of the PA 2008 states:

‘In deciding the application the Panel or Council must have regard to-

Any national policy statement which has effect in relation to development of the description to which the application relates (a ‘relevant national policy

design and assessment of the (document reference 5.1).

included a touring public ections 42, 47 and 48

eport describes the feedback from these consultations and explains cheme was refined in response to representations.

visual effects, health, conomic development

will exceed 50MWe, the under the PA 2008.

evelopment Consent Order

primary and secondary legislation including the : Prescribed Forms and Procedure)

and the Environmental Impact Assessment

sets out the legal framework for the application, examination and determination process for an NSIP. Under these provisions, an applicant submits an

owing an integrated process of EIA and design appoints an Inspector(s) who acts as

makes a recommendation to the Secretary of State on final decision is made by the minister – in

statement which has effect in relation to development of the relevant national policy

b). any local impact report (within the meaning given by section 60(3)) submitted to the Commission before the deadline specified in a notice under section 60(2),

c). any matters prescribed in relation to development of the description to which the application relates, and

d). any other matters which the Panel or Council thinks are both imrelevant to its decision

1.45 The following National Policy Statements (NPS) are

were each approved in Parliament in July 2011, and form the primary source of reference for this Planning Statement.

EN1 – Overarching National Policy Statement for EnergyEN2 – National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating InfrastructureEN4 – National Policy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructure and Gas and Oil PipelinesEN5 – National Policy Statemen

1.46 The Secretary of State must also have regard to any Local Impact Report

local authorities and Application, which may include a variety

Environmental Impact Assessment 1.47 The Scheme is the subject of an EIA under the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental

Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as amended). The findings of the EIA are reported in the ES that accompanies the extensive reference to the ES and should be read alongside it.

Main stages of the DCO application process 1.48 Under the PA 2008, the DCO application process comprises six main stages. Pre-application - during which the applicant undertakes extensive statutory consultation,

evolves the design of the project, undertakes an EIA and prepares a draft DCO and other application documents.

Submission and acceptance of the DCO application

application to PINS, which acts as the Examining Authority on behalf of the Secretary of State. PINS will formally accept the application after a thorough check that the application satisfies various requirements. The application will incluproject.

Pre-examination stage – including a preliminary meeting at which the arrangements for the

examination of the DCO application are discussed.


any local impact report (within the meaning given by section 60(3)) submitted to e Commission before the deadline specified in a notice under section 60(2),

any matters prescribed in relation to development of the description to which the application relates, and any other matters which the Panel or Council thinks are both imrelevant to its decision’.

tional Policy Statements (NPS) are relevant in the current context. They were each approved in Parliament in July 2011, and form the primary source of reference for this Planning Statement.

Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating InfrastructureNational Policy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructure and Gas and Oil PipelinesNational Policy Statement for Electricity Networks Infrastructure

The Secretary of State must also have regard to any Local Impact Report and to any other matters which relate to and are important to

, which may include a variety of national and local policy documents.

Environmental Impact Assessment

is the subject of an EIA under the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as amended). The findings of the EIA are

that accompanies the Application. This Planning Statement makes e to the ES and should be read alongside it.

Main stages of the DCO application process

, the DCO application process comprises six main stages.

during which the applicant undertakes extensive statutory consultation, evolves the design of the project, undertakes an EIA and prepares a draft DCO and other application documents.

Submission and acceptance of the DCO application - the applicant willapplication to PINS, which acts as the Examining Authority on behalf of the Secretary of State. PINS will formally accept the application after a thorough check that the application satisfies various requirements. The application will inclu

including a preliminary meeting at which the arrangements for the examination of the DCO application are discussed.


23

any local impact report (within the meaning given by section 60(3)) submitted to e Commission before the deadline specified in a notice under section 60(2),

any matters prescribed in relation to development of the description to which the

any other matters which the Panel or Council thinks are both important and

in the current context. They were each approved in Parliament in July 2011, and form the primary source of

National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating Infrastructure National Policy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructure and Gas and Oil Pipelines

t for Electricity Networks Infrastructure

The Secretary of State must also have regard to any Local Impact Report produced by any other matters which relate to and are important to the

of national and local policy documents.

is the subject of an EIA under the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as amended). The findings of the EIA are

pplication. This Planning Statement makes

, the DCO application process comprises six main stages.

during which the applicant undertakes extensive statutory consultation, evolves the design of the project, undertakes an EIA and prepares a draft DCO and other

the applicant will submit the DCO application to PINS, which acts as the Examining Authority on behalf of the Secretary of State. PINS will formally accept the application after a thorough check that the application satisfies various requirements. The application will include the ES for the

including a preliminary meeting at which the arrangements for the


24

Examination of the applicationapplication from interested parties and invites the applicant to respond to questions. The examination is likely to include hearings and must be completed within six months.

Reporting – following examination PINS prepares and submits a report of its findings to the

Secretary of State within three months of the end of the examination and recommends whether a DCO should be made.

Decision – is issued by the Secretary of State within three months of rec 1.49 The detailed requirements of this process are set out in the APFP Regulations. The

Planning Inspectorate Advice Note 6: documents provides detailed guidance on the preparation, organisaof application documents for DCO applications, and has been followed by the Applicant.

1.50 The Application is compliant with the requirements of the

Regulations, the EIA Regulations and relevant guidance provided by the Secretary of State and Planning Inspectorate.

1.51 The Order includes Requirements, which comprise a number of commitments

the planning conditions that would attach to a planning application, alongside a set of documents and plans which are to be approved.

1.52 PINS has been provided with a complete list of documents to be provided alongside the

Order, as required by the APFP Regulations. For ease of reference, identifies documents to which the reader of this Planning Statement might lik

Table 1.2: Select list of documents submitted with the

Application document title Application Application Form Copies of newspaper notices Plans and Drawings Land Plan Works Plans Illustrative Layout and Elevational Plans Draft Development Consent Order Draft Development Consent Order Explanatory Memorandum Compulsory Acquisition InformationStatement of Reasons Funding Statement Book of Reference Reports

PLANNING STATEMENT

Examination of the application - during which PINS invites structured comment on the application from interested parties and invites the applicant to respond to questions. The examination is likely to include hearings and must be completed within six months.

mination PINS prepares and submits a report of its findings to the Secretary of State within three months of the end of the examination and recommends whether a DCO should be made.

is issued by the Secretary of State within three months of receipt of PINS’s report.

The detailed requirements of this process are set out in the APFP Regulations. The Planning Inspectorate Advice Note 6: Preparation and submission of application

provides detailed guidance on the preparation, organisation and submission documents for DCO applications, and has been followed by the Applicant.

pplication is compliant with the requirements of the PA 2008Regulations and relevant guidance provided by the Secretary of

State and Planning Inspectorate.

includes Requirements, which comprise a number of commitmentsthe planning conditions that would attach to a Town and Country Plann

, alongside a set of documents and plans which are to be approved.

PINS has been provided with a complete list of documents to be provided alongside the , as required by the APFP Regulations. For ease of reference,

identifies documents to which the reader of this Planning Statement might lik

: Select list of documents submitted with the Application for the MEC

Document reference number

1.11.2

2.22.3

Illustrative Layout and Elevational Plans 2.5.1 - 3.1

3.2Compulsory Acquisition Information

4.14.24.3

during which PINS invites structured comment on the application from interested parties and invites the applicant to respond to questions. The examination is likely to include hearings and must be completed within six months.

mination PINS prepares and submits a report of its findings to the Secretary of State within three months of the end of the examination and recommends

eipt of PINS’s report.

The detailed requirements of this process are set out in the APFP Regulations. The Preparation and submission of application

tion and submission documents for DCO applications, and has been followed by the Applicant.

PA 2008, the APFP Regulations and relevant guidance provided by the Secretary of

includes Requirements, which comprise a number of commitments similar to Town and Country Planning Act 1990

, alongside a set of documents and plans which are to be approved.

PINS has been provided with a complete list of documents to be provided alongside the , as required by the APFP Regulations. For ease of reference, Table 1.2 (below)

identifies documents to which the reader of this Planning Statement might like to refer.

pplication for the MEC

reference number

1.1 1.2

2.2 2.3

2.6.2

3.1 3.2

4.1 4.2 4.3

Application document title Consultation Report Flood Risk Assessment Environmental Impact AssessmentEnvironmental Statement main statement Environmental Statement figuresEnvironmental Statement appendicesEnvironmental Statement Non-Photographs Photographs/Photomontages Plan Identifying Locations and Directions of PhotographsIndex of Photographs / PhotomontagesAdditional Information Grid Connection Statement Gas Connection Statement Other Documents Planning Statement Design and Access Statement

STRUCTURE OF THIS PLANNING STATEMENT 1.53 This Planning Statement has been prepared in sections to allow a clear explanation of

the energy and planning policy context for the • Chapter 2: The need for the

generation and makes specific reference to nneed for the Schemeprovided and the potential for heat supply is a

• Chapter 3: Planning cdecision making process. The government policy identified in applicable National Policy Statements,to other UK and lFramework, National Planning Policy Guidance and the

Chapter 4: Assessmentand environmental guidance as set out in National Policy Statements and other guidance.

• Chapter 5: Anticipated assessment of the likely benefits and disbenefits of the Section 104 of the

• Chapter 6: Conclusions

Scheme accords with relevant policy.


Document reference number

Environmental Impact Assessment main statement figures appendices

-Technical Summary

Identifying Locations and Directions of Photographs

/ Photomontages

STRUCTURE OF THIS PLANNING STATEMENT

This Planning Statement has been prepared in sections to allow a clear explanation of energy and planning policy context for the Scheme, and is arranged as follows.

The need for the Scheme - sets out the urgent need for new energy nd makes specific reference to national energy policy in relation to the

the Scheme. An explanation into the role of gas-fired power generation is provided and the potential for heat supply is addressed.

3: Planning context - a description of the policy framework decision making process. The chapter examines how the

overnment policy identified in applicable National Policy Statements,to other UK and local planning policies, including the National Planning Policy Framework, National Planning Policy Guidance and the development plan

Assessment – examining how the Scheme responds to relevant planning onmental guidance as set out in National Policy Statements and other

Anticipated Scheme benefits and disbenefits - assessment of the likely benefits and disbenefits of the Scheme

of the PA 2008.

Conclusions – presenting overall conclusions over the extent to which the accords with relevant policy.


25

reference number

5.1 5.4

6.2 6.3 6.4 6.1

7.1 7.2 7.3

8.1 8.2

5.2 5.3

This Planning Statement has been prepared in sections to allow a clear explanation of , and is arranged as follows.

ets out the urgent need for new energy ational energy policy in relation to the

fired power generation is

description of the policy framework that informs the examines how the Scheme aligns with

overnment policy identified in applicable National Policy Statements, having regard ocal planning policies, including the National Planning Policy

development plan.

responds to relevant planning onmental guidance as set out in National Policy Statements and other

comprises an overall Scheme, in accordance with

over the extent to which the


26

PLANNING STATEMENT

Two u The need for the

INTRODUCTION 2.1. This Chapter identifies the need

reference to relevant National Policy Statements on energy and other expressions of government policy.

2.2. As noted in Chapter 1 primary basis for decisions on NSIP applications. Other 2008, including any matters which the Secretary of State and relevant to his decision, must also be

NATIONAL POLICY STATEMENTS FOR ENERGY Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy

2.3. The urgent need for new

Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy (E‘Electricity meets a significant proportion of our overall energy needs and our reliance on it is likely to increase as we move towards our 2050 goals’Government needs to ensure sufficient emaximum peak demand, with a safety margin or spare capacity to accommodate unexpectedly high demand and to mitigate risks such as unexpected plant closures and extreme weather events’.

2.4. Para. 3.3.7 of EN-1 explainscapacity will need to be replaced in the coming years, particularly to 2020. This is as a result of tightening environmental regulaadds that ‘any reduction in generation capacity from current levels will need to be replaced in order to ensure security of supply is maintained’

2.5. Para. 3.3.15 of EN-1 highlights order to secure energy suppan urgent need for new (and particularly low carbon) energy NSIPs to be brought forward as soon as possible, and certainly in the next 10 to 15 years, given the crucial role of electricity as the UK decarbonises its energy sector’

2.6. in this context that paragraphs 3.1.1 to 3.1.3 state:


The need for the Scheme: national energy policy

identifies the need for new gas-fired electricity generation in the UK, with reference to relevant National Policy Statements on energy and other expressions of

of this Planning Statement, under the PA 2008primary basis for decisions on NSIP applications. Other considerations

, including any matters which the Secretary of State considers and relevant to his decision, must also be taken into account.

STATEMENTS FOR ENERGY

Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy – EN1 (July 2011)

The urgent need for new electricity generation capacity in the UK is identifiedOverarching National Policy Statement for Energy (EN-1). P‘Electricity meets a significant proportion of our overall energy needs and our reliance on it is likely to increase as we move towards our 2050 goals’. According to pGovernment needs to ensure sufficient electricity generating capacity is available to meet maximum peak demand, with a safety margin or spare capacity to accommodate unexpectedly high demand and to mitigate risks such as unexpected plant closures and extreme weather events’.

1 explains that ‘at least 22 GW of existing electricity generating capacity will need to be replaced in the coming years, particularly to 2020. This is as a result of tightening environmental regulation and ageing power stations’

‘any reduction in generation capacity from current levels will need to be replaced in order to ensure security of supply is maintained’.

1 highlights the urgency of the need for new electricity capacity: order to secure energy supplies that enable us to meet our obligations for 2050, there is an urgent need for new (and particularly low carbon) energy NSIPs to be brought forward as soon as possible, and certainly in the next 10 to 15 years, given the crucial role of

ecarbonises its energy sector’.

in this context that paragraphs 3.1.1 to 3.1.3 state:


27

: national energy policy

fired electricity generation in the UK, with reference to relevant National Policy Statements on energy and other expressions of

PA 2008, the NPSs form the considerations, set out in the PA

considers are both important

electricity generation capacity in the UK is identified in the Para. 3.3.1 states that

‘Electricity meets a significant proportion of our overall energy needs and our reliance on According to para. 3.3.2, ‘The

lectricity generating capacity is available to meet maximum peak demand, with a safety margin or spare capacity to accommodate unexpectedly high demand and to mitigate risks such as unexpected plant closures and

‘at least 22 GW of existing electricity generating capacity will need to be replaced in the coming years, particularly to 2020. This is as a

tion and ageing power stations’. Para. 3.3.9 ‘any reduction in generation capacity from current levels will need to be

the urgency of the need for new electricity capacity: ‘In lies that enable us to meet our obligations for 2050, there is

an urgent need for new (and particularly low carbon) energy NSIPs to be brought forward as soon as possible, and certainly in the next 10 to 15 years, given the crucial role of


28

‘3.1.1 The UK needs all the types of energy infrastructure covered by this NPS in order to achieve energy security at the same time as dramatically reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

3.1.2 It is for industry to propose new energy infrastructure projects within the

strategic framework set by Government. The Government does not consider it appropriate for planning policy to set targets for or limits on different technologies.

3.1.3 The Planning Inspectorate should therefore assess all applications for

development consent for the types of infrastructure covered by the energy NPSs on the basis that those types of Infrastructure and that the scale and urgency of that need is as described for each

2.7. Section 6.1 of EN-1, entitled

particular role of gas-fired power generation in the UK’s future energy mix.

2.8. According to EN-1 para. 3.6.1: ‘Fossil fuel power stations play a vital role in providing reliable electricity supplies: they can be operated flexibly in respondiversity in our energy mix. They will continue to play an important role in our energy mix as the UK makes the transition to a low carbon economy, and Government policy is that they must be constructed, and change goals’.

2.9. Para 3.6.2 acknowledges that sector – providing vital flexibility to support an increasing amount of low carbon generation and to maintain security of supply’

2.10. EN-1 acknowledges that natural gas is a fossil fuel, the use of which gives rise to the emission of greenhouse gases commercial scale combustion power stations at ordesigned to be ‘carbon capture ready’ (CCR). beyond which carbon capture readiness needs to be demonstrated.

2.11. Other aspects of EN-1, of relevance

need to upgrade the National Grid of electricity generation (Section 3.7), and favourable consideration for combined heat and power (CHP), in which waste heat is supplied to other users.Scheme is that it can connect to the electricity distribution network (and ultimately the National Grid) through the existing Barlaston substation on the MBPneed for upgrades to the grid. Locating business park also provides potential for CHP supply.

PLANNING STATEMENT

The UK needs all the types of energy infrastructure covered by this NPS in order energy security at the same time as dramatically reducing

greenhouse gas emissions.

It is for industry to propose new energy infrastructure projects within the strategic framework set by Government. The Government does not consider it

for planning policy to set targets for or limits on different

The Planning Inspectorate should therefore assess all applications for development consent for the types of infrastructure covered by the energy NPSs on the basis that the Government has demonstrated that there is a need for those types of Infrastructure and that the scale and urgency of that need is as described for each of them in this Part.’

1, entitled ‘The role of fossil fuel electricity generatiofired power generation in the UK’s future energy mix.

1 para. 3.6.1:

Fossil fuel power stations play a vital role in providing reliable electricity supplies: they can be operated flexibly in response to changes in supply and demand, and provide diversity in our energy mix. They will continue to play an important role in our energy mix as the UK makes the transition to a low carbon economy, and Government policy is that they must be constructed, and operate, in line with increasingly demanding climate

Para 3.6.2 acknowledges that ‘gas will continue to play an important role in the energy providing vital flexibility to support an increasing amount of low carbon

o maintain security of supply’.

1 acknowledges that natural gas is a fossil fuel, the use of which gives rise to the emission of greenhouse gases – principally carbon dioxide. EN-1 thus requires that all commercial scale combustion power stations at or over 300 MW generationdesigned to be ‘carbon capture ready’ (CCR). The Scheme falls below the threshold beyond which carbon capture readiness needs to be demonstrated.

of relevance to the Scheme, include an acknowledneed to upgrade the National Grid electrical network to accommodate the new pattern of electricity generation (Section 3.7), and favourable consideration for combined heat and power (CHP), in which waste heat is supplied to other users. An a

it can connect to the electricity distribution network (and ultimately the National Grid) through the existing Barlaston substation on the MBPneed for upgrades to the grid. Locating the Scheme on the site of what will be business park also provides potential for CHP supply.

The UK needs all the types of energy infrastructure covered by this NPS in order energy security at the same time as dramatically reducing

It is for industry to propose new energy infrastructure projects within the strategic framework set by Government. The Government does not consider it

for planning policy to set targets for or limits on different

The Planning Inspectorate should therefore assess all applications for development consent for the types of infrastructure covered by the energy NPSs

the Government has demonstrated that there is a need for those types of Infrastructure and that the scale and urgency of that need is as

The role of fossil fuel electricity generation’, explains the fired power generation in the UK’s future energy mix.

Fossil fuel power stations play a vital role in providing reliable electricity supplies: they se to changes in supply and demand, and provide

diversity in our energy mix. They will continue to play an important role in our energy mix as the UK makes the transition to a low carbon economy, and Government policy is that

operate, in line with increasingly demanding climate

‘gas will continue to play an important role in the energy providing vital flexibility to support an increasing amount of low carbon

1 acknowledges that natural gas is a fossil fuel, the use of which gives rise to the 1 thus requires that all

MW generation capacity are falls below the threshold

include an acknowledgement of the to accommodate the new pattern

of electricity generation (Section 3.7), and favourable consideration for combined heat An advantage of the

it can connect to the electricity distribution network (and ultimately the National Grid) through the existing Barlaston substation on the MBP Site, without the

the site of what will be a major

2.12. Part 5 of EN-1 considers the ’generic impacts’ of major energy projects and how these should be considered in new development projects. These include the following, each of which is addressed in MEL’s Planning Statement: • biodiversity and geological conservation;• civil and military aviation and defence interests;• dust, odour, artificial light, smoke a• flood risk; • historic environment;• land use including open space, green infrastructure a• noise and vibration;• socio-economic; • traffic and transport;• waste management;• water quality and resources.

2.13 The Scheme would help to fulfil the national need for new gas

generation as identified in EN National Policy Statement for FossilGenerating Infrastructure – EN 2.14 EN-2 sets out technology

including CCGT projects. The national need is made clear in the firstdocument:

1.1.1 Fossil fuel generating stations play a vital role in providing reliable electricitysupplies and a secure and diverse energy mix as the UK makes thecarbon economy.

2.15 Section 2.2 of EN-2 identifies

headings land use, transport infrastructure, water resources and grid connection. demonstrated in Chapters Scheme responds to each of thbelow are from EN-2):

• Land use – the MBP Site

allowed for CHP infrastructure (para. 2.2.4).

• Transport infrastructurefor the delivery and removal of construction materials, fuel, waste and equipment, and for employees’ (para. 2.2.5).routes’ and, via the Northern Access Roadleading from the main highway network’


1 considers the ’generic impacts’ of major energy projects and how these should be considered in new development projects. These include the following, each of

is addressed in MEL’s suite of Application documents and considered later i

biodiversity and geological conservation; civil and military aviation and defence interests; dust, odour, artificial light, smoke and steam;

historic environment; land use including open space, green infrastructure and green belt;noise and vibration;

traffic and transport; waste management; water quality and resources.

would help to fulfil the national need for new gasgeneration as identified in EN-1.

Policy Statement for Fossil-Fuel Electricity EN-2 (July 2011)

2 sets out technology-specific national policy for fossil fuel electricity generation, including CCGT projects. The national need is made clear in the first

1.1.1 Fossil fuel generating stations play a vital role in providing reliable electricitysupplies and a secure and diverse energy mix as the UK makes the

2 identifies ‘factors influencing site selection by devheadings land use, transport infrastructure, water resources and grid connection.

hapters 3 and 4 of the ES that accompaniesresponds to each of these considerations as follows (parag

Site is able to accommodate the Scheme (para. 2.2.2), with space allowed for CHP infrastructure (para. 2.2.4).

Transport infrastructure – as explained in Chapter 7 of the ES, the for the delivery and removal of construction materials, fuel, waste and equipment, and

(para. 2.2.5). The MEC Site is also ‘in the vicinity of existing transport via the Northern Access Road into the MBP Site, will have

leading from the main highway network’ (para. 2.2.6).


29

1 considers the ’generic impacts’ of major energy projects and how these should be considered in new development projects. These include the following, each of

and considered later in this

nd green belt;

would help to fulfil the national need for new gas-fired electricity

specific national policy for fossil fuel electricity generation, including CCGT projects. The national need is made clear in the first sentence of the

1.1.1 Fossil fuel generating stations play a vital role in providing reliable electricity supplies and a secure and diverse energy mix as the UK makes the transition to a low

‘factors influencing site selection by developers’ under the headings land use, transport infrastructure, water resources and grid connection. As

of the ES that accompanies the Application, the ese considerations as follows (paragraph numbers cited

(para. 2.2.2), with space

of the ES, the MEC Site is ‘accessible for the delivery and removal of construction materials, fuel, waste and equipment, and

‘in the vicinity of existing transport , will have ‘suitable access


30

• Water resources – having regard to the fact that the

cooled, a sufficient supply of water is ava

• Grid connection – MEL has established that a viable grid connection exists for the Station Complex, with a connection via the existing Barlaston substation that to the MEC Site (para. 2.2.11).

2.16 The Scheme conforms with the locational criteria identified in EN 2.17 Section 2.3 of EN-3 sets out

stations’. These reiterate the requirement for applicants to possibilities for CHP have been explored (para. 2.3.2). The potential to supply heat and power to other potential Scheme. With respect to climate change adaptation, resilient, being away from coastal zones, outside any flood risk area and not reliant on large scale water abstraction

2.18 With respect to the guidance on good design for energy infrastructure (paras. 2.3.1

16), it should be noted that the has been based on the maximum structure. Requirements are submission of design details to the

2.19 The extent to which the

noise and vibration and water qualitEN-2, is considered under the respective topic headings later in the Planning Statement. With respect to the policy provisions of ENthat the Scheme is compliant.

National Policy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructureand Gas and Oil Pipelines - EN-4 2.20 Para. 1.1.1 of EN-4 explains the national need for gas supply infrastructure in the

following terms:

'The efficient import, storage and transmissionto meeting our energy needs during the transition to a low carbon economy. We cannot achieve national objectives relating to security of supply without enabling investment in new infrastructure'.

2.21 Part 2 of EN-4 provides guidance on assessment and technologyrespect of the advice on climate change adaption in would not be vulnerable to increased flood risk, rising sea levels or risk of storm sto earth movements or subsidence associated with an increased risk of flooding or drought.

PLANNING STATEMENT

having regard to the fact that the Power Stationa sufficient supply of water is available for cooling purposes (para. 2.2.8

has established that a viable grid connection exists for the , with a connection via the existing Barlaston substation that

2.2.11).

conforms with the locational criteria identified in EN-3.

3 sets out ‘Government policy criteria for fossil fuel generating . These reiterate the requirement for applicants to present evidence tha

possibilities for CHP have been explored (para. 2.3.2). The potential to supply heat and potential occupiers on the MBP Site is a particular attraction

. With respect to climate change adaptation, the MEC Site is considresilient, being away from coastal zones, outside any flood risk area and not reliant on large scale water abstraction for cooling purposes (para. 2.3.13).

With respect to the guidance on good design for energy infrastructure (paras. 2.3.116), it should be noted that the Scheme follows ‘Rochdale Envelope’ principles. The EIA

maximum physical parameters for a functionequirements are included in Schedule 2 of the Order

mission of design details to the relevant planning authority for approval.

The extent to which the Scheme follows policy on air emissions, landscape and visual, noise and vibration and water quality and resources, as set out in S

2, is considered under the respective topic headings later in the Planning Statement. With respect to the policy provisions of EN-2 reviewed in this Chapter

is compliant.

as Supply Infrastructure (July 2011)

4 explains the national need for gas supply infrastructure in the

The efficient import, storage and transmission of natural gas and oil products is crucial to meeting our energy needs during the transition to a low carbon economy. We cannot achieve national objectives relating to security of supply without enabling investment in

4 provides guidance on assessment and technology-specific guidance. In respect of the advice on climate change adaption in Section 2.2, MEL’s would not be vulnerable to increased flood risk, rising sea levels or risk of storm sto earth movements or subsidence associated with an increased risk of flooding or

tation Complex is air-(para. 2.2.8 - 9).

has established that a viable grid connection exists for the Power , with a connection via the existing Barlaston substation that is adjacent

‘Government policy criteria for fossil fuel generating present evidence that the

possibilities for CHP have been explored (para. 2.3.2). The potential to supply heat and is a particular attraction for the

ite is considered to be resilient, being away from coastal zones, outside any flood risk area and not reliant on

With respect to the guidance on good design for energy infrastructure (paras. 2.3.15 – nvelope’ principles. The EIA

physical parameters for a functional power station the Order to ensure the

planning authority for approval.

policy on air emissions, landscape and visual, y and resources, as set out in Sections 2.4-2.10 of

2, is considered under the respective topic headings later in the Planning Statement. Chapter, it is concluded

4 explains the national need for gas supply infrastructure in the

of natural gas and oil products is crucial to meeting our energy needs during the transition to a low carbon economy. We cannot achieve national objectives relating to security of supply without enabling investment in

specific guidance. In MEL’s Gas Connection

would not be vulnerable to increased flood risk, rising sea levels or risk of storm surge, or to earth movements or subsidence associated with an increased risk of flooding or

2.22 Section 2.3 of EN-4 requires applicants to demonstrate good design.

where mitigating the impacts relevant to the infrastructure’in the Design and Access Statement

2.23 Section 2.19 of EN-4 addresses gas and oil pipelines specifically.

Design and Access Statement and design responds to the guidance on site selection in pSection. In summary, the respond to physical and land use constraints including the route of existing eletransmission infrastrucfor the MBP. A majority of the section crossing the Trent and Mersey Canal and the adjacent railway follows the alignment of a pipelinepulverised fuel ash from the former coal

2.24 A particular advantage

the Power Station Compleassociated potential for environmental effects. advice on noise and vibration, biodiversity, landscape and visual considerations, water quality and resources, and sconsidered under the respective topic headings later in th

National Policy Statement for 2.25 This NPS affirms the national need for

UK needs to move tosupply (EN-5 para. 1.1.1).support a more complex with generation occurring in more diverse locations.

2.26 The Scheme represents a sustainable alternative to this approach by optimising

of existing electricity distributionfired power stations on the existing network infrastructure on the location of new proposals. Complex will occupy land the Electrical Connection Station Complex and the there would be no need for additional MEL regards this as a significant advantage of the proposals.

2.27 The Grid Connection Statement

As the Scheme would not create any need for new overhead electricity infrastructure, the advice in Section 2.8relevant. The extent to which the geological conservation (


4 requires applicants to demonstrate good design. where mitigating the impacts relevant to the infrastructure’. MEL’s response is described in the Design and Access Statement (document reference 5.3) for the

4 addresses gas and oil pipelines specifically. Design and Access Statement (document reference 5.3) explainsand design responds to the guidance on site selection in paras. 2.19.7

ection. In summary, the location of the AGI and the route of the Gto physical and land use constraints including the route of existing ele

transmission infrastructure, woodland earmarked for retention and approved proposals A majority of the Gas Connection would be underground. The

ion crossing the Trent and Mersey Canal and the adjacent railway follows the alignment of a pipeline, now removed, pulverised fuel ash from the former coal-fired power stations for disposal

age of the Scheme is that the Gas Connection would be made close to Complex, obviating the need for lengthy pipeline connections and the

associated potential for environmental effects. The extent to which the e and vibration, biodiversity, landscape and visual considerations, water

quality and resources, and soil and geology, as set out in Sections 2.20 considered under the respective topic headings later in this Planning Statement.

al Policy Statement for Electricity Networks Infrastructure - EN-5 (July 2011)

This NPS affirms the national need for new electricity generating infrastructure that the UK needs to move to a low carbon economy while maintaining security of

5 para. 1.1.1). The NPS addresses new electricity networks infrastructure to support a more complex system of supply and demand than curr

occurring in more diverse locations.

resents a sustainable alternative to this approach by optimising distribution infrastructure built originally to serve the

fired power stations on the MBP. Para. 2.2.2 of EN-5 acknowledges the influence of ing network infrastructure on the location of new proposals.

occupy land adjacent to WPD's existing Barlaston substation through whichal Connection will be made. The Electrical Connection between the

and the Barlaston substation will be made by underground cables, and there would be no need for additional overhead electricity lines outside of the

this as a significant advantage of the proposals.

ection Statement (document reference 8.1) confirms would not create any need for new overhead electricity infrastructure,

2.8 of EN-5 on the assessment of landscape and visual effects evant. The extent to which the Scheme follows the advice of EN

geological conservation (Section 2.7), noise and vibration (Section


31

4 requires applicants to demonstrate good design. ‘. . . in particular MEL’s response is described

for the Scheme.

4 addresses gas and oil pipelines specifically. Chapter 4 of MEL's s how pipeline routing

aras. 2.19.7 – 2.19.10 of this the route of the Gas Connection

to physical and land use constraints including the route of existing electricity ture, woodland earmarked for retention and approved proposals

would be underground. The overground ion crossing the Trent and Mersey Canal and the adjacent West Coast Mainline

that used to convey for disposal.

would be made close to , obviating the need for lengthy pipeline connections and the

The extent to which the Scheme follow e and vibration, biodiversity, landscape and visual considerations, water

ections 2.20 - 2.23 of EN-4, is Planning Statement.

5 (July 2011)

new electricity generating infrastructure that the a low carbon economy while maintaining security of electricity

electricity networks infrastructure to system of supply and demand than currently exists and cope

resents a sustainable alternative to this approach by optimising the use infrastructure built originally to serve the former coal-

5 acknowledges the influence of ing network infrastructure on the location of new proposals. The Power Station

substation through which onnection between the Power

be made by underground cables, and electricity lines outside of the MBP Site.

confirms the suitability of this. would not create any need for new overhead electricity infrastructure,

landscape and visual effects is not the advice of EN-5 on biodiversity and

Section 2.9) and electric and


32

magnetic fields (Section 2.10)this Planning Statement.

OTHER NATIONAL POLICY Gas Generation Strategy – DECC, December 2012 2.28 The Gas Generation Strategy

UK. According to the foreword by the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (page 4):

'The UK faces a threefold energy challenge: how to keep the lights on, at affordable prices, while moving towards a sustainable lowway to meet these goals is with a competitive, diverse, lowwhere gas continues to play a vital role.

As we put the UK on course to meet our ambitious emissions reduction targets, existing and ageing power plants will close, large amounts of it through the next decade. Gas a flexible source of generation, which emits half the CO2 of coal balance the relatively inflexible and intermittent lowbring forward. It will provide crucial capacity to keep the lights on and the economy working.

New gas plants, which are relatively cheap and quick to build, will be needed to support the system during this period, providing significant power while greater renewables technologies are deployed. Gas will also continue to play a significant role in heat, where, as we set out in The Future of Heating, we expect gas to remain the dominant fuel in 2030'.

2.29 Having first outlined the current role of g

Strategy sets out its future role. follows.

• 'Government expects that gas will continue to play a major role in our electricity mix

over the coming decades,electricity system. There are several scenarios that may ensue depending on a range of factors, such as fossil fuel prices, carbon prices, demand and the deployment rates and levels of low margin

• Including capacity commissioned this year (or expected to be commissioned shortly),

we could see a need for investment in up to 26

PLANNING STATEMENT

2.10) is considered under the respective topic headings

DECC, December 2012

trategy ('the Strategy') explains the role of gas generation inUK. According to the foreword by the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change

The UK faces a threefold energy challenge: how to keep the lights on, at affordable prices, while moving towards a sustainable low-carbon future. I firmway to meet these goals is with a competitive, diverse, low-carbon energy mix. A mix where gas continues to play a vital role.

As we put the UK on course to meet our ambitious emissions reduction targets, existing ts will close, large amounts of it through the next decade. Gas

a flexible source of generation, which emits half the CO2 of coal – will be needed to help balance the relatively inflexible and intermittent low-carbon generation our policies will

forward. It will provide crucial capacity to keep the lights on and the economy

New gas plants, which are relatively cheap and quick to build, will be needed to support the system during this period, providing significant power while greater renewables technologies are deployed. Gas will also continue to play a significant role in heat, where, as we set out in The Future of Heating, we expect gas to remain the

Having first outlined the current role of gas generation in Chapter 1, Csets out its future role. The Chapter is summarised on p. 14 of the

Government expects that gas will continue to play a major role in our electricity mix over the coming decades, alongside low-carbon technologies as we decarbonise our electricity system. There are several scenarios that may ensue depending on a range of factors, such as fossil fuel prices, carbon prices, demand and the deployment rates and levels of low marginal cost, low-carbon generation.

Including capacity commissioned this year (or expected to be commissioned shortly), we could see a need for investment in up to 26 GW of new gas capacity by 2030.

is considered under the respective topic headings later in

explains the role of gas generation in the UK. According to the foreword by the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change

The UK faces a threefold energy challenge: how to keep the lights on, at affordable carbon future. I firmly believe the best

carbon energy mix. A mix

As we put the UK on course to meet our ambitious emissions reduction targets, existing ts will close, large amounts of it through the next decade. Gas – as

will be needed to help carbon generation our policies will

forward. It will provide crucial capacity to keep the lights on and the economy

New gas plants, which are relatively cheap and quick to build, will be needed to support the system during this period, providing significant power while greater amounts of renewables technologies are deployed. Gas will also continue to play a significant role in heat, where, as we set out in The Future of Heating, we expect gas to remain the

1, Chapter 2 of the is summarised on p. 14 of the Strategy as

Government expects that gas will continue to play a major role in our electricity mix carbon technologies as we decarbonise our

electricity system. There are several scenarios that may ensue depending on a range of factors, such as fossil fuel prices, carbon prices, demand and the deployment rates

Including capacity commissioned this year (or expected to be commissioned shortly), GW of new gas capacity by 2030.

• Our analysis indicates that in the 2020s, some CCGTs (those witefficiencies, i.e. those which are newest or the most recent to have undergone significant maintenance) could achieve load factors over 85%.

• By 2030, average load factors across the fleet are likely to be lower th

been historically.

• Gas could play a more extensive role, with higher load factors, should the 4th Carbon Budget be revised upwards. Including capacity commissioned this year (or expected to be commissioned shortly), this could lead to a need for investment in up to 37 of new gas capacity by 2030.

• There will be an important role for gas in 2030 and beyond, with the ability for gas to

provide significant amounts of low 2.30 The Strategy thus foresees an important future role for gas gene

stepping-stone on the route to a low carbon economy. In these terms, gasstations have a valuable role to play in the management of electricity supply from intermittent renewable sources such as wind and solar energy. Accof the Gas Generation Strategy:

'While National Grid Gas (NGG) forecast declining annual and (to a lesser extent) peak gas demand, they expect volatility of gas use to increase in coming years, particularly volatility of demand from twill have an increased

2.31 Power stations of the

balancing role, whilst helping energy supplies.

National Infrastructure Plan – 2.32 This document monitors

term plans for national the heading ‘Needs’, para. 8.3 affirms thatcarbon electricity generation is vital in order to replace ageing energy infrastructure, maintain secure energy supplies and meet legally£100 billion of investment is estimated to be required in electricity generation and networks by 2020'. According to para. 8.5backup for less flexible renewable generation and topeak electricity demand. Demand for gas to supply heat to homes and businesses will also remain significant for some time to come

2.33 Under the heading ‘Delivery


Our analysis indicates that in the 2020s, some CCGTs (those witefficiencies, i.e. those which are newest or the most recent to have undergone significant maintenance) could achieve load factors over 85%.

By 2030, average load factors across the fleet are likely to be lower th

Gas could play a more extensive role, with higher load factors, should the 4th Carbon Budget be revised upwards. Including capacity commissioned this year (or expected to be commissioned shortly), this could lead to a need for investment in up to 37 of new gas capacity by 2030.

There will be an important role for gas in 2030 and beyond, with the ability for gas to provide significant amounts of low-carbon electricity with CCS'.

trategy thus foresees an important future role for gas genestone on the route to a low carbon economy. In these terms, gas

stations have a valuable role to play in the management of electricity supply from intermittent renewable sources such as wind and solar energy. Acc

eneration Strategy:

While National Grid Gas (NGG) forecast declining annual and (to a lesser extent) peak gas demand, they expect volatility of gas use to increase in coming years, particularly volatility of demand from the power sector driven by increased intermittency

balancing role'.

Power stations of the size of the Scheme proposed by MEL are, whilst helping more generally to meet the national

– HM Treasury, December 2014

monitors the UK government’s progress on delivery and sets out its longnational infrastructure. Chapter 8 considers energy infrastructure. Under

the heading ‘Needs’, para. 8.3 affirms that 'Large-scale investment in gas and lowcarbon electricity generation is vital in order to replace ageing energy infrastructure, maintain secure energy supplies and meet legally-binding environmental targets. Around £100 billion of investment is estimated to be required in electricity generation and

According to para. 8.5 . . . 'New gas plant is also needed as a vital backup for less flexible renewable generation and to ensure that the system can meet peak electricity demand. Demand for gas to supply heat to homes and businesses will also remain significant for some time to come'.

Under the heading ‘Delivery Plan’, para. 8.28 states that:


33

Our analysis indicates that in the 2020s, some CCGTs (those with the highest efficiencies, i.e. those which are newest or the most recent to have undergone

By 2030, average load factors across the fleet are likely to be lower than they have

Gas could play a more extensive role, with higher load factors, should the 4th Carbon Budget be revised upwards. Including capacity commissioned this year (or expected to be commissioned shortly), this could lead to a need for investment in up to 37 GW

There will be an important role for gas in 2030 and beyond, with the ability for gas to .

trategy thus foresees an important future role for gas generation as a reliable stone on the route to a low carbon economy. In these terms, gas-fired power

stations have a valuable role to play in the management of electricity supply from intermittent renewable sources such as wind and solar energy. According to para. 4.32

While National Grid Gas (NGG) forecast declining annual and (to a lesser extent) peak gas demand, they expect volatility of gas use to increase in coming years, particularly

he power sector driven by increased intermittency, as CCGTs

are well suited to this to meet the national need for new, secure,

government’s progress on delivery and sets out its long-y infrastructure. Under

scale investment in gas and low-carbon electricity generation is vital in order to replace ageing energy infrastructure,

nvironmental targets. Around £100 billion of investment is estimated to be required in electricity generation and

New gas plant is also needed as a vital ensure that the system can meet

peak electricity demand. Demand for gas to supply heat to homes and businesses will


34

'To support delivery of its objectives for the energy sector, the government has included the following within its Top 40 prio

• electricity generation –

2.34 It is concluded that the Scheme CONCLUSION 2.35 It is concluded that the Scheme

and the Strategy for gas generation specifically. infrastructure identifies a clear and important role for gas of national energy objectives.generation infrastructure, enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the transition to a low carbon economy.

2.36 The Scheme would be able to operate flexibly in response to peak energy demands, and

will be able to compensate for intermittent supply from other electricity sources including renewables.

2.37 Having demonstrated compliance with national energy policy ob

section of this Planning Statement considers the planning policy.

PLANNING STATEMENT

its objectives for the energy sector, the government has included the following within its Top 40 priority infrastructure investments . . .

– gas . . .’.

Scheme accords with the National Infrastructure

Scheme accords with national energy and infrastructure policy trategy for gas generation specifically. National policy for energy and

infrastructure identifies a clear and important role for gas generation in the attainment of national energy objectives. Proposals such as the MEC will help to replace aged power generation infrastructure, enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the transition to a low carbon economy.

be able to operate flexibly in response to peak energy demands, and will be able to compensate for intermittent supply from other electricity sources

Having demonstrated compliance with national energy policy objectives, the following of this Planning Statement considers the Scheme in the light of national and local

its objectives for the energy sector, the government has included

tructure Plan.

with national energy and infrastructure policy National policy for energy and

generation in the attainment will help to replace aged power

generation infrastructure, enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the

be able to operate flexibly in response to peak energy demands, and will be able to compensate for intermittent supply from other electricity sources

jectives, the following in the light of national and local

INTRODUCTION 3.1 The government’s planning policies for England are

Policy Framework (NPPFFramework -

‘does not contain specific policies for nationally significantwhich particular considerations apply. These aredecision-making framework set out in thestatements for major both important and relevant (which may include the National Planning PolFramework). National policy statements form part of the overall frameworkplanning policy, and are a material consideration in decisions on

3.2 Nonetheless, the National Policy Statements for Energy include referenc

guidance on particular topics such as flood risk assessment. This Scheme in the context of national planning policythe Scheme conforms to local development plan policy.

NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY 3.3 The Scheme is consistent with various relevant

following:

i). The aspiration to build aa coordinated approach to economic developart of sustainable development objectives (NPPF para. 7, first bullet

ii). Facilitating job creation (NPPF para. 9). The

for the wider regeneration of the iii). Helping to ‘proactively drive and support sustainable

deliver the . . . business and industrial units, infrastructure and thriving local places that the country needs’

iv). Supporting ‘the transition to a low carbon future in a changing climate’ (NPPF para.

17, sixth bullet-point). The role of gas generation in this context is explained in the previous Chapter of this Planning Statement


Three u Planning policy

The government’s planning policies for England are set out in the National Policy Framework (NPPF), March 2012. According to paragraph

does not contain specific policies for nationally significant infrastructure projects for which particular considerations apply. These are determined in

making framework set out in the PA 2008 and relevant national policy infrastructure, as well as any other matters that are considered

important and relevant (which may include the National Planning PolFramework). National policy statements form part of the overall frameworkplanning policy, and are a material consideration in decisions on planning applications

Nonetheless, the National Policy Statements for Energy include referencguidance on particular topics such as flood risk assessment. This

in the context of national planning policy. It also examines the extent to which conforms to local development plan policy.

PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK

consistent with various relevant principles of the NPPF, including the

The aspiration to build a strong, responsive and competitive economy and to ensure a coordinated approach to economic development and infrastructure provision, as a part of sustainable development objectives (NPPF para. 7, first bullet

Facilitating job creation (NPPF para. 9). The Scheme is intended to provide a catalyst for the wider regeneration of the MBP Site;

Helping to ‘proactively drive and support sustainable economic deliver the . . . business and industrial units, infrastructure and thriving local places that the country needs’ (Core planning principles, NPPF para. 17, third bullet

Supporting ‘the transition to a low carbon future in a changing climate’ (NPPF para. point). The role of gas generation in this context is explained in the

of this Planning Statement;


35

Planning policy

set out in the National Planning graph 3 of the NPPF, the

infrastructure projects for determined in accordance with the

and relevant national policy infrastructure, as well as any other matters that are considered

important and relevant (which may include the National Planning Policy Framework). National policy statements form part of the overall framework of national

planning applications’.

Nonetheless, the National Policy Statements for Energy include references to NPPF guidance on particular topics such as flood risk assessment. This Chapter considers the

. It also examines the extent to which

of the NPPF, including the

strong, responsive and competitive economy and to ensure pment and infrastructure provision, as a

part of sustainable development objectives (NPPF para. 7, first bullet-point);

is intended to provide a catalyst

economic development to deliver the . . . business and industrial units, infrastructure and thriving local places

(Core planning principles, NPPF para. 17, third bullet-point);

Supporting ‘the transition to a low carbon future in a changing climate’ (NPPF para. point). The role of gas generation in this context is explained in the


36

v). Encouraging ‘the effective use of landeveloped (brownfield land), (NPPF para. 17, eighth bullet

vi). Section 1 of the NPPF, entitled

other things, this Sectionto promote sustainable economic development at the local level. The manner in which the development plan for Stafford approaches these requirements, and howthe Scheme responds in turn,

3.4 The NPPF provides thematic guidance on topics including the conservation of the natural

and historic environments. consideration of these aspects in the EIA for the

LOCAL POLICY The Plan for Stafford Borough, 2014 3.5 The Plan for Stafford Borough

Borough Council as the statutory development plan for the area that includes the Site. The Plan sets out strategic policies, identifies housing and employment and includes various topic

3.6 Some of the main issues and challenges

additional employment opportunities that meet local needs, concerns and aspirations for a diverse local economy’ (Plan, para. 4.1).MBP Site is expected to play a significant role in

3.7 Chapter 6 of the Plan explains

This includes Spatial Principle 2: Requirements, which sets out how Stafford Borough will accommodate new growth and investment over the Plan period. Thisper year of employment land, to provide for the future needs and prosperity of residents. By facilitating the regeneration ofguiding spatial principle.

3.8 Chapter 9 of the Plan sets out the borough’s economic policies.

lends general support toeconomy. According to para

'There are also a number of significant brownfield sites located in the North Staffordshire Green Belt, known as Major Developed Sites. In order to encourage rethese areas for new employment provision, to support inward investment and job creation opportunities in the North Staffordshire conurbation, these are identified on the

PLANNING STATEMENT

effective use of land by reusing land that has been developed (brownfield land), provided that it is not of high environmental value’ (NPPF para. 17, eighth bullet-point);

Section 1 of the NPPF, entitled ‘Building a Strong, Competitive EcoSection of the NPPF explains how development plans are expected

to promote sustainable economic development at the local level. The manner in the development plan for Stafford approaches these requirements, and how

responds in turn, are considered in the following section

The NPPF provides thematic guidance on topics including the conservation of the natural and historic environments. This guidance influenced the methodology for the

these aspects in the EIA for the Scheme.

, 2014

e Plan for Stafford Borough ('the Plan') was adopted on 19 June 2014 by Stafford as the statutory development plan for the area that includes the

lan sets out strategic policies, identifies strategic development locations housing and employment and includes various topic-based policies.

and challenges that face Stafford over the Plan additional employment opportunities that meet local needs, concerns and aspirations for

(Plan, para. 4.1). As explained below, the regeneratiis expected to play a significant role in fulfilling this objective

explains the development strategy for the Borough of Stafford. This includes Spatial Principle 2: Stafford Borough Housing and Employment

sets out how Stafford Borough will accommodate new growth and lan period. This includes provision for approximately eight hectares

per year of employment land, to provide for the future needs and prosperity of ng the regeneration of the MBP, the Scheme is consistent with this

sets out the borough’s economic policies. Policy E1lends general support to new economic development in order to sustain the local

According to para. 9.21:

There are also a number of significant brownfield sites located in the North Staffordshire Green Belt, known as Major Developed Sites. In order to encourage rethese areas for new employment provision, to support inward investment and job creation opportunities in the North Staffordshire conurbation, these are identified on the

d by reusing land that has been previously provided that it is not of high environmental value’

‘Building a Strong, Competitive Economy’. Amongst of the NPPF explains how development plans are expected

to promote sustainable economic development at the local level. The manner in the development plan for Stafford approaches these requirements, and how

in the following section.

The NPPF provides thematic guidance on topics including the conservation of the natural This guidance influenced the methodology for the

was adopted on 19 June 2014 by Stafford as the statutory development plan for the area that includes the MBP

strategic development locations for

lan period ‘providing additional employment opportunities that meet local needs, concerns and aspirations for

As explained below, the regeneration of the this objective.

the development strategy for the Borough of Stafford. Stafford Borough Housing and Employment

sets out how Stafford Borough will accommodate new growth and includes provision for approximately eight hectares

per year of employment land, to provide for the future needs and prosperity of consistent with this

Policy E1: Local economy new economic development in order to sustain the local

There are also a number of significant brownfield sites located in the North Staffordshire Green Belt, known as Major Developed Sites. In order to encourage re-development of these areas for new employment provision, to support inward investment and job creation opportunities in the North Staffordshire conurbation, these are identified on the

Inset Maps at Hadleigh Park (previously known as Creda / Indesit works), tMeaford Power Station, and Moorfields Industrial Estate

3.9 Policy E5: Major developed sites in the green belt

the Scheme:

'The following sites will be identified as previously developed sites (whein continuing use, excluding temporary buildings) within the Green Belt, where limiinfilling or the partial or purposes consistent with Spatial Principle the openness of the Green Belt and theexisting development:

• Hadleigh Park (Former Creda Works Limited), Blythe Bridge.• Moorfields Industrial Estate, Swynnerton.• Former Meaford Power Stati

3.10 For reasons already explained, the

policy E5 with respect to the a source of skilled employment and as an enabling development for the Connection pipeline for the lines on the MBP Siteuses. With the Power the MBP Site would remain for other employmentfor employment use in

3.11 Other Plan policies to whi

i). Policy N4: The natural environment and green infrastructuremeasures to protect and enhance the Borough's natural environment. This policy incorporates a vision for biodiversity and open spaces to be seen as integral elements of sustainable development. In response, the landscape proposals for the Scheme incorporate

ii). Policy N5: Sites of European, National and Local Nature Conservation Importance

reinforces the importance of a hierarchy of designated nature conservation sites, with the highest level of protection attached to European Sof the ES explains how the effects of the sites have been taken into account. In summary, no significant adverse effects would arise from the construction

iii). Policy N8: Landscape c

and sympathetic to, landscape character and quality, demonstrated through local site specific assessments in the context of the Staffordshire Landscape Assessment together with Historic Landscape Characterisation Assessment and the Historic Environment Character Assessment.


Inset Maps at Hadleigh Park (previously known as Creda / Indesit works), tMeaford Power Station, and Moorfields Industrial Estate'.

developed sites in the green belt, which follows, is directly relevant to

The following sites will be identified as previously developed sites (wheuse, excluding temporary buildings) within the Green Belt, where limi

infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment will be supported for employment nsistent with Spatial Principle SP7, which would not hav

the openness of the Green Belt and the purpose of including land within i

Hadleigh Park (Former Creda Works Limited), Blythe Bridge. Moorfields Industrial Estate, Swynnerton. Former Meaford Power Station, Meaford, Stone'.

For reasons already explained, the Scheme will directly support the implementation of policy E5 with respect to the 'Former Meaford Power Station' site, a source of skilled employment and as an enabling development for the

pipeline for the Scheme has been routed alongside existing overhead power Site in order to avoid sterilising land with potential for em

ower Station Complex and its connections in place, would remain for other employment-generating uses on the land allocated

for employment use in Plan policy E5.

lan policies to which the current proposals have regard include the following.

The natural environment and green infrastructuremeasures to protect and enhance the Borough's natural environment. This policy incorporates a vision for biodiversity and open spaces to be seen as integral

nts of sustainable development. In response, the landscape proposals for the ate new wildlife habitats.

Sites of European, National and Local Nature Conservation Importancereinforces the importance of a hierarchy of designated nature conservation sites, with the highest level of protection attached to European Sites.

explains how the effects of the Scheme on designated nature conservation been taken into account. In summary, no significant adverse effects

would arise from the construction, operation and maintenance

Landscape character requires development proposals to be informed by, and sympathetic to, landscape character and quality, demonstrated through local site specific assessments in the context of the Staffordshire Landscape Assessment together with Historic Landscape Characterisation Assessment and the Historic Environment Character Assessment. The landscape and visual chapter of


37

Inset Maps at Hadleigh Park (previously known as Creda / Indesit works), the former

, which follows, is directly relevant to

The following sites will be identified as previously developed sites (whether redundant or use, excluding temporary buildings) within the Green Belt, where limited

complete redevelopment will be supported for employment SP7, which would not have a greater impact on

including land within it than the

will directly support the implementation of site, the MBP Site, both as

a source of skilled employment and as an enabling development for the MBP. The Gas has been routed alongside existing overhead power

in order to avoid sterilising land with potential for employment and its connections in place, a majority of land in

generating uses on the land allocated

include the following.

The natural environment and green infrastructure, which sets out measures to protect and enhance the Borough's natural environment. This policy incorporates a vision for biodiversity and open spaces to be seen as integral

nts of sustainable development. In response, the landscape proposals for the

Sites of European, National and Local Nature Conservation Importance, reinforces the importance of a hierarchy of designated nature conservation sites,

ites. The ecology chapter on designated nature conservation

been taken into account. In summary, no significant adverse effects and maintenance of the Scheme.

requires development proposals to be informed by, and sympathetic to, landscape character and quality, demonstrated through local site specific assessments in the context of the Staffordshire Landscape Character Assessment together with Historic Landscape Characterisation Assessment and the

The landscape and visual chapter of


38

the ES and the Applicant’s Design and Access Statement explain strategy for the Schemethe MBP.

iv). Policy N9: Historic e

significance of a heritage asset will not be accepted for consideration unless they provide sufficient information for that impact to be assessed.set out relevant planning of the ES for the Schemeinclude the Trent and Mersey Canal extent of the MBP and would be crossed by the Station Complex at Canal chapter of the ES explains, measures proposed to avoid harm to the character and interest of the Conservation Bridge 101 (Malkin's Bridge)includes a substantial reinforcement of screen planting on the western side of the canal, to screen views over the

v). Policy I1: Infrastructure delivery

be supported by suitable levels of physical, social and environmental infrastructure at an appropriate stage, as identified in the Plan (considered below)contribution by supporting highway and service infrastructure provision on the Site.

3.12 It is concluded that the

provisions of The Plan for Stafford Borough and would actively support the steconomic development aspirations for the locality.

Stafford Borough Infrastructure StrategyStage 2 Infrastructure Delivery Plan: Final Report 3.13 This Infrastructure Delivery

identifying the critical infrastructure required to support the delivery of Stafford Borough. In terms of a long term role, the IDP constitutes a framework to monitor infrastructure delivery,

3.14 The IDP fulfils the requirement of

Framework, which states that local planning authorities should:

‘Work with other local authorities and providers to assess the quality and capacity ofinfrastructure for transport, water supp(including heat), telecommunications, utilities, waste, health, social care, education, flood risk and coastal change management, and its ability to meet forecast demands'.

PLANNING STATEMENT

the ES and the Applicant’s Design and Access Statement explain Scheme responds to the wider local context and the development of

Historic environment advises that proposals which would affect the significance of a heritage asset will not be accepted for consideration unless they

rovide sufficient information for that impact to be assessed. The policy proceeds to set out relevant planning and design considerations. The cultural heritage chapter

Scheme identifies heritage assets in the surrounding clude the Trent and Mersey Canal Conservation Area, which runs along the eastern

and would be crossed by the Gas ConnectionCanal Bridge 101 (Malkin’s Bridge). As the cultural heritage

chapter of the ES explains, measures proposed to avoid harm to the character and onservation Area including repair of the northern

(Malkin's Bridge). In addition, the landscape strategyincludes a substantial reinforcement of screen planting on the western side of the canal, to screen views over the MBP Site from the Conservation Area.

Infrastructure delivery requires new commercial and other be supported by suitable levels of physical, social and environmental infrastructure at an appropriate stage, as identified in the Stafford Borough Infrastructure Delivery

(considered below). In these terms the Scheme would make a valucontribution by supporting highway and service infrastructure provision on the

It is concluded that the Scheme accords with relevant environmental protection Plan for Stafford Borough and would actively support the st

economic development aspirations for the locality.

Stafford Borough Infrastructure Strategy 2012: Stage 2 Infrastructure Delivery Plan: Final Report

elivery Plan (IDP) was published in July 2012 with the intention of the critical infrastructure required to support the delivery of

Stafford Borough. In terms of a long term role, the IDP constitutes a framework to monitor infrastructure delivery, land use and development.

he requirement of paragraph 162 of the National Planning Policy Framework, which states that local planning authorities should:

‘Work with other local authorities and providers to assess the quality and capacity ofinfrastructure for transport, water supply, wastewater and its treatment, energy (including heat), telecommunications, utilities, waste, health, social care, education, flood risk and coastal change management, and its ability to meet forecast demands'.

the ES and the Applicant’s Design and Access Statement explain how the landscape and the development of

advises that proposals which would affect the significance of a heritage asset will not be accepted for consideration unless they

The policy proceeds to he cultural heritage chapter

surrounding area. These rea, which runs along the eastern

Gas Connection for the Power As the cultural heritage

chapter of the ES explains, measures proposed to avoid harm to the character and northern parapet of Canal

he landscape strategy for the Scheme includes a substantial reinforcement of screen planting on the western side of the

rea.

and other development to be supported by suitable levels of physical, social and environmental infrastructure

Infrastructure Delivery would make a valuable

contribution by supporting highway and service infrastructure provision on the MBP

with relevant environmental protection Plan for Stafford Borough and would actively support the strategic

with the intention of the critical infrastructure required to support the delivery of The Plan for

Stafford Borough. In terms of a long term role, the IDP constitutes a framework to

paragraph 162 of the National Planning Policy

‘Work with other local authorities and providers to assess the quality and capacity of ly, wastewater and its treatment, energy

(including heat), telecommunications, utilities, waste, health, social care, education, flood risk and coastal change management, and its ability to meet forecast demands'.

3.15 The IDP categorises and assesses physical, environmental and social.would be of local and national significance, the potential to supply surplus heat to future occupiers of the MBP is consistent with IDP objectives.

CONCLUSION 3.16 The Scheme is compliant with relevant national and local planning policy.

economically significant project that accords with the sustainable development objectives of the NPPF.

3.17 The MBP Site is brownfield in charac

conservation or landscape designations. The cultural heritage value of the restricted to the adjoining which would be enhanced as a result of the parapet of Canal Bridge 101along the western side of the

3.18 The development of the Scheme attractiveness of the MBP to other occupiers through a substantial investment in landscape works and the potential to supply heat for industrial processes.


The IDP categorises and assesses infrastructure requirements into three broad groups environmental and social. Whereas the electricity generated by the

national significance, the potential to supply surplus heat to future is consistent with IDP objectives.

is compliant with relevant national and local planning policy. economically significant project that accords with the sustainable development objectives of the NPPF.

is brownfield in character and is not subject to any protective nature conservation or landscape designations. The cultural heritage value of the

adjoining Trent and Mersey Canal Conservation Areawould be enhanced as a result of the Scheme through the

Canal Bridge 101 (Malkin’s Bridge) and the reinforcement of screen planting along the western side of the Canal.

of the Scheme will support the development of the MBPto other occupiers through a substantial investment in landscape works and

the potential to supply heat for industrial processes.


39

ements into three broad groups – Whereas the electricity generated by the Scheme

national significance, the potential to supply surplus heat to future

is compliant with relevant national and local planning policy. It is an economically significant project that accords with the sustainable development

is not subject to any protective nature conservation or landscape designations. The cultural heritage value of the MBP Site is

Conservation Area, the setting of through the repair of the northern

and the reinforcement of screen planting

the MBP. It would enhance the to other occupiers through a substantial investment in landscape works and


40

PLANNING STATEMENT

INTRODUCTION 4.1 This Chapter of the Planning Statement reviews the

policy and guidance set out in relevant National Policy Statements for energy. The structure of this ChapterNPS EN-1.

4.2 In weighing potential adverse effects against the benefits of a project, para

1 states that the decisioncontribution to meeting the need for energy infrasterm or wider benefits’. account ‘its potential adverse impacts, including any longimpacts, as well as any measures to avoid,impacts’.

4.3 According to paragraph 4.1.4 of EN

‘environmental, social and economic benefits and adverse impacts, at national, regional and local levels’. Para.Plan Documents or other documents in the Local Development Framework as both important and relevant to its decisionconflict between these or any other docpurposes of IPC decision making given the national significance of the infrastructure’.

4.4 EN-1 confirms in paras. 4.1.7 and 4.1.8 that the decision maker can take into account the

‘guidance in Circular 11/95 aor any successor to it’ applicant agrees with local authorities’. Planning Practice Guidance entitled planning conditions in Appendix A to the Circular remain current.

4.5 Viability issues are addressed in para

maker will consider ‘on information and technical feasibility of the proposal has been properly assessed by the applicant it is unlikely to be of relevance in IPC decision’.

ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT 4.6 The Infrastructure Planning

amended) (the ‘IP (EIA) Regulations 2009development that is classed as an EIA development.


Four u

of the Planning Statement reviews the Scheme in the light of the detailed policy and guidance set out in relevant National Policy Statements for energy. The

Chapter follows the structure of the ‘Assessment Principles’ set ou

In weighing potential adverse effects against the benefits of a project, para1 states that the decision-maker should take into account potential benefits ‘contribution to meeting the need for energy infrastructure, job creation and any longterm or wider benefits’. Para. 4.1.3 advises that the decision maker should also take into

‘its potential adverse impacts, including any long-term and cumulative adverse impacts, as well as any measures to avoid, reduce or compensate for any adverse

According to paragraph 4.1.4 of EN-1, the decision maker should take into account environmental, social and economic benefits and adverse impacts, at national, regional

. 4.1.5 states that the decision maker may consider Development Plan Documents or other documents in the Local Development Framework as both important and relevant to its decision-making, whilst noting that ‘conflict between these or any other documents and an NPS, the NPS prevails for the purposes of IPC decision making given the national significance of the infrastructure’.

1 confirms in paras. 4.1.7 and 4.1.8 that the decision maker can take into account the guidance in Circular 11/95 as revised, on ‘The Use of Conditions in Planning Permissions

or any successor to it’ in addition to any ‘development consent obligations that an applicant agrees with local authorities’. In March 2014, Circular 11/95 was replaced by

dance entitled Use of Planning Conditionsplanning conditions in Appendix A to the Circular remain current.

Viability issues are addressed in para. 4.1.9 of EN-1, which advises that the decision ‘on information provided in an application, that the financial viability

and technical feasibility of the proposal has been properly assessed by the applicant it is unlikely to be of relevance in IPC decision’.

ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT

The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as IP (EIA) Regulations 2009’) require an EIA to be undertaken on any

development that is classed as an EIA development. EIA development is defined as


41

u Assessment

in the light of the detailed policy and guidance set out in relevant National Policy Statements for energy. The

follows the structure of the ‘Assessment Principles’ set out in

In weighing potential adverse effects against the benefits of a project, para. 4.1.3 of EN-maker should take into account potential benefits ‘including its

tructure, job creation and any long-4.1.3 advises that the decision maker should also take into

term and cumulative adverse reduce or compensate for any adverse

1, the decision maker should take into account environmental, social and economic benefits and adverse impacts, at national, regional

tates that the decision maker may consider Development Plan Documents or other documents in the Local Development Framework as both

making, whilst noting that ‘in the event of a uments and an NPS, the NPS prevails for the

purposes of IPC decision making given the national significance of the infrastructure’.

1 confirms in paras. 4.1.7 and 4.1.8 that the decision maker can take into account the The Use of Conditions in Planning Permissions’

development consent obligations that an Circular 11/95 was replaced by

Use of Planning Conditions, although the model

, which advises that the decision provided in an application, that the financial viability

and technical feasibility of the proposal has been properly assessed by the applicant it is

(Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 (as ) require an EIA to be undertaken on any

EIA development is defined as


42

either Schedule 1 development or Scheffects on the environment by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location.

4.7 Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations

impact assessment. Schedule 2development that requires environment.

4.8 The thermal output of the

constitute a Schedule 1 development as provided in the EIA Regulations. 4.9 Schedule 2 para. 3 (a) includes the following type of development:

‘Industrial installations for the production of electricity, steam and hot water (projects not included in Schedule 1)

4.10 On this basis the Scheme

the characteristics of the of the receptors likely to be affected. in accordance with the EIA Regulations. The findings of the EIA are described in the ES.

4.11 In accordance with Section

of the environment likely to be affected by the likely significant effects of the economic effects. The ES considers the likely significantScheme and identifies how any likely significant negative effects would be avoided or mitigated.

HABITATS AND SPECIES REGULATIONS (NPS EN 4.12 Section 4.3 of EN-1 states that the decision maker must

and Species Regulations, consider European site or on any site to which the same protection is applied as a matter of policy, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects. In accordance with these requirements a ‘No SignThe NSER concludes that there would be no significant effects on the identified European sites. In accordance with Reg 5(2)(l)(document reference 6.2would have on statutory and nonthe habitats of protected species, important features and other diversity features.

PLANNING STATEMENT

either Schedule 1 development or Schedule 2 development likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location.

Schedule 1 of the EIA Regulations identifies development that requireimpact assessment. Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations provides a description of

requires EIA if it is expected to have significant effects on the

The thermal output of the Scheme will be under 300 MW and therefore it does not development as provided in the EIA Regulations.

includes the following type of development:

installations for the production of electricity, steam and hot water (projects not included in Schedule 1)’.

Scheme falls within Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulationsthe characteristics of the Scheme, its potential impact and the environmental sensitivity of the receptors likely to be affected. An EIA has duly been undertaken for thin accordance with the EIA Regulations. The findings of the EIA are described in the ES.

Section 4.2 of EN-1, the ES has considered and described the aspects of the environment likely to be affected by the Scheme. In particular, likely significant effects of the Scheme on the environment, including

considers the likely significant effects arisinghow any likely significant negative effects would be avoided or

IES REGULATIONS (NPS EN-1, 4.3)

1 states that the decision maker must, in accordance with the Habitats consider whether the project may have a significant effect on a

European site or on any site to which the same protection is applied as a matter of policy, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects. In accordance with these requirements a ‘No Significant Effects Report’ (NSER) (document reference

concludes that there would be no significant effects on the identified European In accordance with Reg 5(2)(l) of the APFP Regulations 2009, Chapter

6.2.11) provides an assessment of any effects that the Scheme would have on statutory and non-statutory nature conservation sitethe habitats of protected species, important features and other diversity features.

edule 2 development likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location.

requires an environmental of the EIA Regulations provides a description of

if it is expected to have significant effects on the

and therefore it does not development as provided in the EIA Regulations.

installations for the production of electricity, steam and hot water (projects

falls within Schedule 2 of the EIA Regulations, having regard to , its potential impact and the environmental sensitivity

been undertaken for the Scheme in accordance with the EIA Regulations. The findings of the EIA are described in the ES.

1, the ES has considered and described the aspects it has assessed the

including social and arising at all stages of the

how any likely significant negative effects would be avoided or

in accordance with the Habitats whether the project may have a significant effect on a

European site or on any site to which the same protection is applied as a matter of policy, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects. In accordance with

ument reference 5.9). concludes that there would be no significant effects on the identified European

hapter 11 of the ES ) provides an assessment of any effects that the Scheme

statutory nature conservation sites and features and the habitats of protected species, important features and other diversity features.

ALTERNATIVES (NPS EN-1, 4.4, NPS 4.13 Para. 4.4.1 of EN-1 advises that the NPS does not contain any general requirement to

consider alternatives or to establish whether the Scheme represents the best option. However, para. 4.4.2 of ENa matter of fact, information about the main alternatives they have studied. This should include an indication of the main reasons for the applicant’s choice, taking into account the environmental, social and economic effects and including, where relevant, technical and commercial feasibility’.

4.14 As required, the ES provides the following details on the following alternatives assessed:

• alternative development sites;• alternatives layouts for the • alternatives for the

4.15 Throughout the pre-application process, received in response to the nonconsideration of alternatives consultation are explained in

4.16 MEL has undertaken a strategic search for potential CCGT power station sites in the UK,

using a phased methodology. The search focused on identifying locations where gas supply and electrical grid networks with sufficient capacity to serve a new CCGT pstation coincide.

4.17 In evaluating potential locations

• environmental constraints• technical requirements• local planning policy• socio-economic considerations• land availability.

4.18 The MBP Site afforded the following advantages:

• it is close to the National Grid’s strategic area for new electricity generation in the southern half of the UK

• it has good access to national gas • it is within a brownfield site with an extant planning permission for business use;• it is a site with a history of power generation;• there are potential synergies with future users of the adjacent• there are also potential regenerative effects to the local economy.


1, 4.4, NPS EN-4, 2.19.8-10 AND NPS EN-5, 2.8.5)

1 advises that the NPS does not contain any general requirement to consider alternatives or to establish whether the Scheme represents the best option. However, para. 4.4.2 of EN-1 states that ‘applicants are obliged to include in their ES, as a matter of fact, information about the main alternatives they have studied. This should include an indication of the main reasons for the applicant’s choice, taking into account

ental, social and economic effects and including, where relevant, technical and commercial feasibility’.

As required, the ES provides the following details on the following alternatives assessed:

alternative development sites; alternatives layouts for the Power Station Complex;

the Gas Connection and Electrical Connection.

application process, MEL has taken into account the received in response to the non-statutory and statutory consultations concerning the consideration of alternatives sites and designs for the Scheme. MEL’s responses to this

explained in the Consultation Report (document reference

MEL has undertaken a strategic search for potential CCGT power station sites in the UK, using a phased methodology. The search focused on identifying locations where gas supply and electrical grid networks with sufficient capacity to serve a new CCGT p

evaluating potential locations, the following considerations were

constraints; requirements (site size and availability of gas and electrical connections);

local planning policy; considerations

ite afforded the following advantages:

it is close to the National Grid’s strategic area for new electricity generation in the the UK;

it has good access to national gas and electricity distribution networks;a brownfield site with an extant planning permission for business use;

it is a site with a history of power generation; there are potential synergies with future users of the adjacent MBP

lso potential regenerative effects to the local economy.


43

)

1 advises that the NPS does not contain any general requirement to consider alternatives or to establish whether the Scheme represents the best option.

applicants are obliged to include in their ES, as a matter of fact, information about the main alternatives they have studied. This should include an indication of the main reasons for the applicant’s choice, taking into account

ental, social and economic effects and including, where relevant, technical

As required, the ES provides the following details on the following alternatives assessed:

account the feedback statutory and statutory consultations concerning the

the Scheme. MEL’s responses to this ument reference 5.1).

MEL has undertaken a strategic search for potential CCGT power station sites in the UK, using a phased methodology. The search focused on identifying locations where gas supply and electrical grid networks with sufficient capacity to serve a new CCGT power

were taken into account:

(site size and availability of gas and electrical connections);

it is close to the National Grid’s strategic area for new electricity generation in the

and electricity distribution networks; a brownfield site with an extant planning permission for business use;

MBP; and lso potential regenerative effects to the local economy.


44

4.19 With regard to alternative technologies, NPS EN

‘Within the strategic framework established by government it is for industry to propose the specific types of developments that they assess to be viable. This is the nature of a market-based energy system

4.20 MEL concluded that CCGT power generation represents an appropriate choice of fuel

and technology for the Scheme. CCGT technology is highly efficient, resullower carbon dioxide emissions power stations can respond flexibly in terms of their output, thus helping to meet peaks of energy demand and maintaining a balanced supply of electricity

4.21 In relation to alternative locations and

of the Design and Access Statementhas evolved. It describes the specific considerations that have influenced the layout including environmental and physical constraints, options for the Electrical Connection, access to the public highway and planning considerations incluthe existing outline planning permission for the MBP.

4.22 The indicative layout represents the preferred option for a number of reasons

its proximity to the Barlaston substation, its lowand its low ecological potential.

4.23 With respect to Electrical

potential adverse effects associated with overhead lines. the operational 132kV Barlaston substationMeaford ‘A’ and ‘B’ power stations. This existing substation is located adjacent to thePower Station Complex and can accommodate the without the need for new overhead lines or significant n

4.24 In terms of the Gas Connection, para. 2.19.8 of EN

pipelines should consider ‘relevant constraints including proximity of existing and planned residential properties.... below surface usage and psensitive areas, main river and watercourse crossings’. Chapter Design and Access Statement identify the environmental and design considerations that have influenced the design of the Gas Connection pipeline.Connection has taken into account considerations including:

• the length of the Gas Connection pipeline• reuse of the existing railway and canal crossings

transporting pulverised fuel ash fromstorage lagoons to the east of the MBP;

• avoidance of vegetated areas• the use of existing infrastructure corridors including electricity

line routes, thus avoiding land with potential for redevelopment as a part of the MBP regeneration;

PLANNING STATEMENT

With regard to alternative technologies, NPS EN-1 states at para 3.3.6 that:

ithin the strategic framework established by government it is for industry to propose elopments that they assess to be viable. This is the nature of a

based energy system’.

MEL concluded that CCGT power generation represents an appropriate choice of fuel and technology for the Scheme. CCGT technology is highly efficient, resul

carbon dioxide emissions in comparison with a coal-fired power station. Gaspower stations can respond flexibly in terms of their output, thus helping to meet peaks of energy demand and maintaining a balanced supply of electricity to the National Grid.

locations and layouts for the Power Station Complexof the Design and Access Statement (document reference 5.3) explainshas evolved. It describes the specific considerations that have influenced the layout including environmental and physical constraints, options for the G

onnection, access to the public highway and planning considerations incluthe existing outline planning permission for the MBP.

represents the preferred option for a number of reasonsits proximity to the Barlaston substation, its low-lying position in respect of the

low ecological potential.

lectrical Connection options, paragraph 2.5.2 of ENpotential adverse effects associated with overhead lines. The MBP Site the operational 132kV Barlaston substation owned by WPD, which previously served the

power stations. This existing substation is located adjacent to theand can accommodate the Electrical Connection of the MEC

without the need for new overhead lines or significant network reinforcement.

In terms of the Gas Connection, para. 2.19.8 of EN-4 advises that the design of new pipelines should consider ‘relevant constraints including proximity of existing and planned residential properties.... below surface usage and proximity to environmentally sensitive areas, main river and watercourse crossings’. Chapter 3 Design and Access Statement identify the environmental and design considerations that have influenced the design of the Gas Connection pipeline. In design terms the GasConnection has taken into account considerations including:

the length of the Gas Connection pipeline; reuse of the existing railway and canal crossings that were used previously for pipes transporting pulverised fuel ash from the former Meaford ‘A’ power station to the storage lagoons to the east of the MBP; avoidance of vegetated areas with the most ecological potential; the use of existing infrastructure corridors including electricity pylon and

oiding land with potential for redevelopment as a part of the MBP

1 states at para 3.3.6 that:

ithin the strategic framework established by government it is for industry to propose elopments that they assess to be viable. This is the nature of a

MEL concluded that CCGT power generation represents an appropriate choice of fuel and technology for the Scheme. CCGT technology is highly efficient, resulting in much

fired power station. Gas-fired power stations can respond flexibly in terms of their output, thus helping to meet peaks

to the National Grid.

layouts for the Power Station Complex, Chapter 3 explains how the layout

has evolved. It describes the specific considerations that have influenced the layout Gas Connection and

onnection, access to the public highway and planning considerations including

represents the preferred option for a number of reasons, including lying position in respect of the MBP Site,

2.5.2 of EN-5 identifies Site already contains

, which previously served the power stations. This existing substation is located adjacent to the

onnection of the MEC etwork reinforcement.

4 advises that the design of new pipelines should consider ‘relevant constraints including proximity of existing and

roximity to environmentally of the ES and the

Design and Access Statement identify the environmental and design considerations that In design terms the Gas

were used previously for pipes the former Meaford ‘A’ power station to the

pylon and overhead oiding land with potential for redevelopment as a part of the MBP

• avoidance of land in third party ownershipacquisition powers required by the Scheme

4.25 The evaluation of alternatives has been informed b

taking into account relevant planning and energy policy and environmental regulations. GOOD DESIGN (NPS EN-1, 4.5 4.26 Para. 4.5.4 of EN-1 requires applicants to ‘

how the design process was conducted and how the proposed design evolved’. Design and Access Statement ((document reference 6.2Consultation Report (dochave influenced the design of the

4.27 Section 4.5 of EN-1 identifies criteria in respect of ‘good design’ for energy

infrastructure. Para. 4.5.1 states that ‘produce sustainable infrastructure sensitive to place, efficient in the use of natural resources and energy used in their construction and operation, matched by an appearance that demonstrates good aesthetic as far as4.5.3 of EN-1 states that the Sinfrastructure developments are sustainable and, having regard to regulatory and other constraints, are as attractive, durable and adaptable as they can be’.

4.28 Para. 2.3.16 states that

respect of landscape and visual amenity..... and in the design of the project to mitigate impacts such as noise and vibration, transport impacts and air emissions.EN-4 requires applicants to demonstrate good desi

4.29 Section 3 of the Design and Access Statement explains the design considerations

relevant to the principal components of the Power Station Complex. These include an aspiration to minimise the visual screening of existing trees and natural landform.

4.30 The landscape strategy seeks to

including provision for reinforced screen planting alongside the Trent and Mersey Canal, as outlined in the previ

4.31 The noise chapter of the ES explains the measures proposed to

vibration effects arising from the constructionScheme.


avoidance of land in third party ownership to limit the extent of compulsory acquisition powers required by the Scheme.

The evaluation of alternatives has been informed by iterative EIA and technical analysis, taking into account relevant planning and energy policy and environmental regulations.

1, 4.5, EN-2, 2.3.16 EN-4, 2.3)

1 requires applicants to ‘demonstrate in their apphow the design process was conducted and how the proposed design evolved’. Design and Access Statement (document reference 5.3) and C(document reference 6.2.3) explain the design evolution of the Scheme.

document reference 5.1) explains how the consultation responses have influenced the design of the Scheme.

1 identifies criteria in respect of ‘good design’ for energy 4.5.1 states that ‘Applying good design to energy projects should

produce sustainable infrastructure sensitive to place, efficient in the use of natural resources and energy used in their construction and operation, matched by an appearance that demonstrates good aesthetic as far as possible’.

1 states that the Secretary of State ‘needs to be satisfied that energy infrastructure developments are sustainable and, having regard to regulatory and other constraints, are as attractive, durable and adaptable as they can be’.

2.3.16 states that ‘Applicants should demonstrate good design particularly in respect of landscape and visual amenity..... and in the design of the project to mitigate impacts such as noise and vibration, transport impacts and air emissions.

4 requires applicants to demonstrate good design.

Section 3 of the Design and Access Statement explains the design considerations relevant to the principal components of the Power Station Complex. These include an aspiration to minimise the visual effects of the Scheme and to take advantage of screening of existing trees and natural landform.

The landscape strategy seeks to mitigate the effects of the Power provision for reinforced screen planting alongside the Trent and Mersey Canal,

vious Chapter of this Planning Statement.

The noise chapter of the ES explains the measures proposed to ising from the construction, operation and maintenance


45

to limit the extent of compulsory

y iterative EIA and technical analysis, taking into account relevant planning and energy policy and environmental regulations.

demonstrate in their application documents how the design process was conducted and how the proposed design evolved’. The

) and Chapter 3 of the ES the design evolution of the Scheme. The

) explains how the consultation responses

1 identifies criteria in respect of ‘good design’ for energy good design to energy projects should

produce sustainable infrastructure sensitive to place, efficient in the use of natural resources and energy used in their construction and operation, matched by an

possible’. Furthermore, para. ‘needs to be satisfied that energy

infrastructure developments are sustainable and, having regard to regulatory and other constraints, are as attractive, durable and adaptable as they can be’.

good design particularly in respect of landscape and visual amenity..... and in the design of the project to mitigate impacts such as noise and vibration, transport impacts and air emissions. Para. 2.3.2 of

Section 3 of the Design and Access Statement explains the design considerations relevant to the principal components of the Power Station Complex. These include an

and to take advantage of the

ower Station Complex provision for reinforced screen planting alongside the Trent and Mersey Canal,

The noise chapter of the ES explains the measures proposed to mitigate noise and and maintenance of the


46

CONSIDERATION OF COMBINED HEAT 4.32 Section 4.6 of EN-1 describes the consideration that should be given in projects

potential for combined heat and power (CHP). Paraguidelines issued by DECC (then DTI) in 2006 [the Guidance], any application to develop a thermal generating station under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 must either include CHP or contain evidence that the possibilities for CHP have been fully explored to inform the paragraph continues ‘The same principle applies to any thermal power station which is the subject of an application for development consent under the

4.33 The Scheme incorporates a dedicated

feasible to process and supply heat to future occupiers on the purposes of the EIA, it is assumed that the and that the equipment required to facilitate CHP durinComplex is not operating requirements. The Power later date when the MBP Scheme that is CHP-ready up to the boundary of the Power Station Complex, and which incorporates the required back

4.34 The incorporation of a heat interface building

the Scheme complies with the guidance set out in NPS EN CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE AND CARBON CAPTURE READINESS 4.35 Section 4.7 of NPS EN-1 deals with CCS and carbon capture. It states that

for new combustion plant which and of a type covered by the EU’s Large Combustion Plant Directive (LCPD) should demonstrate that the plant is ‘carbon capture ready’ (CCR). The Scheme has generating capacity of up to 299MWaccordance with EN-1, the Scheme is not required to demonstrate readiness.

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION (NPS EN 4.36 Section 4.8 of EN-1 advises

infrastructure is resilient to climate change.out how proposals would be resilient to climate change risks such as flooding and higher temperatures. Policy N2: Climate Change2014) requires new development to including the need to ensure protection from, and not worsen, the potential for flooding.

PLANNING STATEMENT

CONSIDERATION OF COMBINED HEAT AND POWER (NPS EN-1, 4.6)

1 describes the consideration that should be given in projects potential for combined heat and power (CHP). Para. 4.6.6 of EN-1 states that ‘underguidelines issued by DECC (then DTI) in 2006 [the Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Guidance], any application to develop a thermal generating station under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 must either include CHP or contain evidence that the possibilities for CHP have been fully explored to inform the consideration of the application’

The same principle applies to any thermal power station which is the subject of an application for development consent under the PA 2008

The Scheme incorporates a dedicated heat interface building from which it would be feasible to process and supply heat to future occupiers on the MBPpurposes of the EIA, it is assumed that the Power Station Complex will be ‘CHPand that the equipment required to facilitate CHP during times when

is not operating could be incorporated into the Schemeower Station Complex design would enable this to be added

generates sufficient demand. The ES has therefore assessed a ready up to the boundary of the Power Station Complex, and which

incorporates the required back-up plant.

heat interface building within the Power Station Complex ensures the Scheme complies with the guidance set out in NPS EN-1.

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE AND CARBON CAPTURE READINESS (NPS EN

1 deals with CCS and carbon capture. It states thatfor new combustion plant which have a rated generating capacity at or over 300MWand of a type covered by the EU’s Large Combustion Plant Directive (LCPD) should demonstrate that the plant is ‘carbon capture ready’ (CCR). The Scheme has

of up to 299MWe and would fall below the threshold of 300MW1, the Scheme is not required to demonstrate

CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION (NPS EN-1, 4.8, EN-2, 2.3.13, EN-4, 2.2 AND

advises that applicants and the SoS should ensure that new energy infrastructure is resilient to climate change. Section 2.2 of EN-4 requires applicants to set out how proposals would be resilient to climate change risks such as flooding and higher

Policy N2: Climate Change of The Local Plan for Stafford Borough (June 2014) requires new development to mitigate against the impact of climate change including the need to ensure protection from, and not worsen, the potential for flooding.

1 describes the consideration that should be given in projects for the 1 states that ‘under

Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Guidance], any application to develop a thermal generating station under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 must either include CHP or contain evidence that the possibilities

consideration of the application’. The The same principle applies to any thermal power station which is

PA 2008’.

from which it would be MBP Site. For the will be ‘CHP-ready’,

g times when Power Station be incorporated into the Scheme, subject to users’

design would enable this to be added at a therefore assessed a

ready up to the boundary of the Power Station Complex, and which

within the Power Station Complex ensures

(NPS EN-1, 4.7)

1 deals with CCS and carbon capture. It states that all applications generating capacity at or over 300MWe

and of a type covered by the EU’s Large Combustion Plant Directive (LCPD) should demonstrate that the plant is ‘carbon capture ready’ (CCR). The Scheme has a rated

and would fall below the threshold of 300MWe. In 1, the Scheme is not required to demonstrate carbon capture

4, 2.2 AND EN-5, 2.4)

should ensure that new energy 4 requires applicants to set

out how proposals would be resilient to climate change risks such as flooding and higher of The Local Plan for Stafford Borough (June

mitigate against the impact of climate change including the need to ensure protection from, and not worsen, the potential for flooding.

4.37 The ES has assessed the likely significant environmental effects of the Scheme. In addition a Flood Risk Assessmeto the implementation of a site specific drainage strategy, there would be no significant flood risks arising from

4.38 Para. 2.3.13 of EN-2 anticipates that fossil fuel generating

proposed for coastal or estuarine sites and as such ‘to increase risks from flooding or rising sea levels’. area or near to any tidal rivers.

4.39 On this basis, the Scheme is not considered to be at risk from climate change and

therefore accords with relevant national and local planning policy in this regard. GRID CONNECTION (NPS EN-1, 4.9) 4.40 Para. 4.9.1 of EN-1 states that ‘

necessary infrastructure and capacity within an existing or planned transmission or distribution network to accommodate the electricity generated’. accompanied by a Grid Connection Statement (confirmed that the existing Barlaston substation can accommodate the the need for new overhead lines or significant network reinforcement. therefore connect to the with EN-1 in respect of grid connection.

POLLUTION CONTROL AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY REGIMES(NPS EN-1, 4.10) 4.41 According to para. 4.10.1 of

air quality, water quality, land quality or noise and vibration may be subject to separate regulation under the pollution control framework or other consenting and licensing regimes’. Other consents and licenses that will be required These are detailed in the Details of Other Consents and Licences 5.6) and how they would be obtained at relevant stages of developmentThe Application submission therefore accords with ENand other environmental regulatory regimes.

SAFETY (NPS EN-1, 4.11) 4.42 Para. 4.11.1 of EN-1 advises that applicants should consult with the Health and Safety

Executive (HSE) on matters relating to safety. The HSE was constatutory consultation for the Scheme. As explained in the Consultation Report (document reference 5.1the consultation distances of any current Major Hazard Installations an


The ES has assessed the likely significant environmental effects of the Scheme. In addition a Flood Risk Assessment (document reference 5.4) has concluded that, subject to the implementation of a site specific drainage strategy, there would be no significant flood risks arising from or to the Scheme.

2 anticipates that fossil fuel generating stations are likely to be proposed for coastal or estuarine sites and as such ‘climate change is likely, for example to increase risks from flooding or rising sea levels’. The Scheme is not located in a coastal area or near to any tidal rivers.

the Scheme is not considered to be at risk from climate change and therefore accords with relevant national and local planning policy in this regard.

1, 4.9)

1 states that ‘it is for the applicant to ensure that there will be necessary infrastructure and capacity within an existing or planned transmission or distribution network to accommodate the electricity generated’. accompanied by a Grid Connection Statement (document referenceconfirmed that the existing Barlaston substation can accommodate the the need for new overhead lines or significant network reinforcement.

the Barlaston substation. On this basis the Scheme is in accordance 1 in respect of grid connection.

POLLUTION CONTROL AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY REGIMES

According to para. 4.10.1 of EN1, ‘issues relating to discharges or emissions which affect y, water quality, land quality or noise and vibration may be subject to separate

regulation under the pollution control framework or other consenting and licensing ther consents and licenses that will be required separately from the Order.

These are detailed in the Details of Other Consents and Licences ) and how they would be obtained at relevant stages of development

pplication submission therefore accords with EN-1 in respect of pollution control and other environmental regulatory regimes.

1 advises that applicants should consult with the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) on matters relating to safety. The HSE was constatutory consultation for the Scheme. As explained in the Consultation Report

5.1), the HSE has confirmed that the MEC Site does not fall within the consultation distances of any current Major Hazard Installations an


47

The ES has assessed the likely significant environmental effects of the Scheme. In has concluded that, subject

to the implementation of a site specific drainage strategy, there would be no significant

stations are likely to be climate change is likely, for example

The Scheme is not located in a coastal

the Scheme is not considered to be at risk from climate change and therefore accords with relevant national and local planning policy in this regard.

cant to ensure that there will be necessary infrastructure and capacity within an existing or planned transmission or distribution network to accommodate the electricity generated’. The Application is

ference 8.1). WPD has confirmed that the existing Barlaston substation can accommodate the Scheme without the need for new overhead lines or significant network reinforcement. The Scheme will

e Scheme is in accordance

POLLUTION CONTROL AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY REGIMES

issues relating to discharges or emissions which affect y, water quality, land quality or noise and vibration may be subject to separate

regulation under the pollution control framework or other consenting and licensing separately from the Order.

These are detailed in the Details of Other Consents and Licences (document reference ) and how they would be obtained at relevant stages of development of the Scheme.

respect of pollution control

1 advises that applicants should consult with the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) on matters relating to safety. The HSE was consulted during the statutory consultation for the Scheme. As explained in the Consultation Report

Site does not fall within the consultation distances of any current Major Hazard Installations and would not


48

impinge on the separation distances of any licensed explosive sites. The HSE has identified four Major Accident Hazard Pipelines (Natural Gas) in the vicinity of the Site. However, the formal consultation responsebe unlikely to object to the Scheme.

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (NPS EN 4.43 Section 4.12 of EN-1 states that applicants should consult the HSE at pre

stage if a project is likely to need hazardous substances consent. previous section and in the Consultation Report (formally consulted. Its response required if the proposal includes storage or use of the named or generic categories of substances/preparations at or above the controlled quantities set out in Schedthe Planning (Hazardous Substances) RHazardous Substances (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2009 and 2010) ('the Hazardous Substances Regulations')

4.44 No substances listed in Schedule 1 of

or stored on the MEC Site. As HEALTH (NPS EN-1, 4.13 NPS EN- 4.45 Section 4.13 of EN-1 explains how applicants should

effect on human beings for each element of the developmenthealth impacts, and identifying measures to avoid, reduce or compensate for these impacts as appropriate’. infrastructure which are most likely to have a significantly detrimental impact on health are subject to separate regulation (for example for air pollution) which will constitute effective mitigation of them, so that it is unlikely constitute a reason to refuse consents or require specific mitigation under the

4.46 Section 2.10 of EN-5 identifies electric and magnetic fields (EMF) as having the potential

to result in both direct and indithat EMF ‘arise from generation, transmission, distribution and use of electricity and will occur around power lines and electrical cables’. satisfied that a project restrictions and reference levels, based on evidence provided by the applicant and any other relevant evidence.

4.47 Chapter 8: Air Quality, Chapter 9: Noise and Vibration and Chapter 13:

Conditions of the ES assesses the potential effects of the Scheme on the health of human receptors.

PLANNING STATEMENT

impinge on the separation distances of any licensed explosive sites. The HSE has identified four Major Accident Hazard Pipelines (Natural Gas) in the vicinity of the Site. However, the formal consultation response from the HSE confirmed th

the Scheme.

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (NPS EN-1, 4.12 AND EN-4, 2.4)

1 states that applicants should consult the HSE at prestage if a project is likely to need hazardous substances consent. As explained

and in the Consultation Report (document referenceformally consulted. Its response was that Hazardous Substances Consent would only be required if the proposal includes storage or use of the named or generic categories of substances/preparations at or above the controlled quantities set out in Sched

Planning (Hazardous Substances) Regulations 1992 (as amended by the Planning Hazardous Substances (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2009 and 2010) ('the Hazardous Substances Regulations').

No substances listed in Schedule 1 of the Hazardous Substances Regulations will be used ite. As such, Hazardous Substances Consent will

-5, 2.10)

1 explains how applicants should assess how schemes could for each element of the development, ‘identifying

health impacts, and identifying measures to avoid, reduce or compensate for these impacts as appropriate’. Para. 4.13.5 of EN-1 states ‘those aspects of energy infrastructure which are most likely to have a significantly detrimental impact on health are subject to separate regulation (for example for air pollution) which will constitute effective mitigation of them, so that it is unlikely that health concerns will either constitute a reason to refuse consents or require specific mitigation under the

5 identifies electric and magnetic fields (EMF) as having the potential to result in both direct and indirect effects on human health. Para. 2.10.1 of EN

arise from generation, transmission, distribution and use of electricity and will occur around power lines and electrical cables’. EN-5 advises that the SoS will need to be

is in accordance with the ICNIRP 1998 guidelines on EMF restrictions and reference levels, based on evidence provided by the applicant and any

Chapter 8: Air Quality, Chapter 9: Noise and Vibration and Chapter 13:Conditions of the ES assesses the potential effects of the Scheme on the health of human

impinge on the separation distances of any licensed explosive sites. The HSE has identified four Major Accident Hazard Pipelines (Natural Gas) in the vicinity of the MEC

from the HSE confirmed that it would

1 states that applicants should consult the HSE at pre-application As explained in the

ument reference 5.1), the HSE was that Hazardous Substances Consent would only be

required if the proposal includes storage or use of the named or generic categories of substances/preparations at or above the controlled quantities set out in Schedule 1 of

1992 (as amended by the Planning Hazardous Substances (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2009 and 2010) ('the

ous Substances Regulations will be used Substances Consent will not be required.

assess how schemes could have an identifying any adverse

health impacts, and identifying measures to avoid, reduce or compensate for these those aspects of energy

infrastructure which are most likely to have a significantly detrimental impact on health are subject to separate regulation (for example for air pollution) which will constitute

that health concerns will either constitute a reason to refuse consents or require specific mitigation under the PA 2008’.

5 identifies electric and magnetic fields (EMF) as having the potential rect effects on human health. Para. 2.10.1 of EN-5 states

arise from generation, transmission, distribution and use of electricity and will 5 advises that the SoS will need to be

is in accordance with the ICNIRP 1998 guidelines on EMF restrictions and reference levels, based on evidence provided by the applicant and any

Chapter 8: Air Quality, Chapter 9: Noise and Vibration and Chapter 13: Ground Conditions of the ES assesses the potential effects of the Scheme on the health of human

4.48 In addition and in response to a England, the application submission is accompanied by a He(document reference 9.2no significant effects on health are anticipated.

4.49 On this basis, it is considered that the Scheme accords with relevant national planning

policy in relation to health. COMMON LAW NUISANCE AND STATUTORY NUISANCE (NPS EN 4.50 Section 4.14 of EN-1 highlights the need for the consideration of sources of nuisance.

Para. 4.14.2 identifies the need for the SoS to consider NSIP schemes and possible sources of nuisance under how they might be mitigated or limited so that appropriate requirements can be included in any order granting development consent.

4.51 The Application is accompanied by a Statement of Statutory Nuisance

reference 5.5) which sets out the potential construction, operation79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. The Report concludes that the potential of the to the implementation of the identified mitigaScheme is therefore in compliance with EN

SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS (NPS EN 4.52 Para. 4.15.2 of EN-1 states that it is ‘

proportionate protective at an early stage in the project development. security measures that will be implemented as part of the Scheme, including camerassecurity lodge and perimeter fencing. Further details of Chapter 4 of the ES and in the Design and Access Statement. The Scheme therefore accords with EN-1 in respect of security considerations.

AIR QUALITY AND EMISSIONS ( 4.53 Para. 5.2.1 of EN-1 advises that infrastructure development can have adverse effects on

air quality. Para. 5.2.4 of ENgenerally released through exhaust stacks. Design of exhaust stacks,is the primary driver for the delivery of optimal dispersion of emissions and is often determined by statutory requirements1 should be followed in respect of fossil fuel generating st


In addition and in response to a statutory consultation response from Public Health England, the application submission is accompanied by a Health Impact Assessment

9.2). Both the ES and the Health Impact Assessment confirm that no significant effects on health are anticipated.

On this basis, it is considered that the Scheme accords with relevant national planning icy in relation to health.

COMMON LAW NUISANCE AND STATUTORY NUISANCE (NPS EN-1, 4.14)

1 highlights the need for the consideration of sources of nuisance. 4.14.2 identifies the need for the SoS to consider NSIP schemes and possible

sources of nuisance under Section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and how they might be mitigated or limited so that appropriate requirements can be

granting development consent.

pplication is accompanied by a Statement of Statutory Nuisance ) which sets out the potential statutory nuisances operation and maintenance phases of the Scheme

79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. The Statement of Statutory Nuisance eport concludes that the potential of the Scheme to cause statutory nuisance, subject

to the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, would be negligible. The Scheme is therefore in compliance with EN-1.

SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS (NPS EN-1, 4.15)

states that it is ‘Government policy to ensure that, where possible, proportionate protective security measures are designed into new infrastructure projects at an early stage in the project development. Schedule 1 of the security measures that will be implemented as part of the Scheme, including cameras

erimeter fencing. Further details of these measures are provided in of the ES and in the Design and Access Statement. The Scheme therefore

1 in respect of security considerations.

AIR QUALITY AND EMISSIONS (NPS EN-1, 5.2 NPS EN-2, 2.5)

1 advises that infrastructure development can have adverse effects on 5.2.4 of EN-1 states that ‘Emissions from combustion plants are

generally released through exhaust stacks. Design of exhaust stacks,is the primary driver for the delivery of optimal dispersion of emissions and is often determined by statutory requirements’. EN-2 confirms that the guidance contained in EN1 should be followed in respect of fossil fuel generating stations.


49

consultation response from Public Health alth Impact Assessment

Health Impact Assessment confirm that

On this basis, it is considered that the Scheme accords with relevant national planning

1, 4.14)

1 highlights the need for the consideration of sources of nuisance. 4.14.2 identifies the need for the SoS to consider NSIP schemes and possible

79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and how they might be mitigated or limited so that appropriate requirements can be

pplication is accompanied by a Statement of Statutory Nuisance Report (document nuisances arising from the

Scheme as defined in Section Statement of Statutory Nuisance

to cause statutory nuisance, subject tion measures, would be negligible. The

Government policy to ensure that, where possible, s are designed into new infrastructure projects

Schedule 1 of the Order explains the security measures that will be implemented as part of the Scheme, including cameras, a

these measures are provided in of the ES and in the Design and Access Statement. The Scheme therefore

1 advises that infrastructure development can have adverse effects on Emissions from combustion plants are

generally released through exhaust stacks. Design of exhaust stacks, particularly height, is the primary driver for the delivery of optimal dispersion of emissions and is often

2 confirms that the guidance contained in EN-


50

4.54 Para. 5.2.7 of EN-1 identifies the air quality and emission requirements that should be assessed within an ES including the following:

• 'any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual effects distinguishing

between the project stages and taking account of any significant emissions from any road traffic generated by the project;

• the predicted absolute emission levels of the proposed project, after mitigation methods have been applied;

• existing air quality levels and the relative change in air quality from existing levels; and

• any potential eutrophication impacts 4.55 Para. 5.2.11 of EN-1 advises that the SoS should consider ‘

are needed both for operational and construction emissions over and above any which may form part of the project application’.

4.56 In accordance with the guidance of

the Scheme in respect of air qualityassessment are presented in Chapter 8 of the ES. The air quality assessment considers direct and indirect emissions of air pollutdecommissioning phases of the Scheme.

4.57 The air quality assessment concludes that road traffic emissions during the construction

and operational phases would have a neutral impact on local pollutant concenand as such, an insignificant effect on local receptors. construction plant emissions will be temporary and intermittent, their effect on local air quality has been assessed as not significant.

4.58 Likely dust emissions during the construction and operational phases have been

considered. No significant residual effects relating to dust emissions are anticipated and on this basis all identified residential, commercial and industrial properties and ecological receptors are likely to remain unaffected by dust.

4.59 The Stack emissions from the Scheme would not lead to any exceedances of statutory air

quality criteria at sensitive receptors. significant. Effects of oxides of nitrostatutory and non-statutory ecological sites were also assessed to be insignificant.

4.60 All potential air quality cumulative impacts of the Scheme alongside the MBP and the

SCC Highways Works were also assessed as being insignificant. 4.61 During the construction and decommissioning phases

Management Plan (DMP) would be developed and incorporated into an overall Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP). A

PLANNING STATEMENT

1 identifies the air quality and emission requirements that should be assessed within an ES including the following:

any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual effects distinguishing between the project stages and taking account of any significant emissions from any road traffic generated by the project;

the predicted absolute emission levels of the proposed project, after mitigation methods have been applied;

existing air quality levels and the relative change in air quality from existing levels; and

any potential eutrophication impacts'.

1 advises that the SoS should consider ‘whether mitigation measures are needed both for operational and construction emissions over and above any which may form part of the project application’.

the guidance of EN-1 and EN-2, an assessment of the likely in respect of air quality has been undertaken. The findings of this

assessment are presented in Chapter 8 of the ES. The air quality assessment considers direct and indirect emissions of air pollutants during the construction, operational and decommissioning phases of the Scheme.

The air quality assessment concludes that road traffic emissions during the construction and operational phases would have a neutral impact on local pollutant concenand as such, an insignificant effect on local receptors. In addition, given that construction plant emissions will be temporary and intermittent, their effect on local air quality has been assessed as not significant.

during the construction and operational phases have been considered. No significant residual effects relating to dust emissions are anticipated and on this basis all identified residential, commercial and industrial properties and

likely to remain unaffected by dust.

tack emissions from the Scheme would not lead to any exceedances of statutory aircriteria at sensitive receptors. The emissions effect on air quality is not

significant. Effects of oxides of nitrogen concentrations and nitrogen deposition rates at statutory ecological sites were also assessed to be insignificant.

All potential air quality cumulative impacts of the Scheme alongside the MBP and the were also assessed as being insignificant.

During the construction and decommissioning phases of the SchemeManagement Plan (DMP) would be developed and incorporated into an overall Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP). A draft CEMP is provided

1 identifies the air quality and emission requirements that should be

any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual effects distinguishing between the project stages and taking account of any significant emissions from any

the predicted absolute emission levels of the proposed project, after mitigation

existing air quality levels and the relative change in air quality from existing levels; and

whether mitigation measures are needed both for operational and construction emissions over and above any which

2, an assessment of the likely effects of has been undertaken. The findings of this

assessment are presented in Chapter 8 of the ES. The air quality assessment considers ants during the construction, operational and

The air quality assessment concludes that road traffic emissions during the construction and operational phases would have a neutral impact on local pollutant concentrations

In addition, given that construction plant emissions will be temporary and intermittent, their effect on local air

during the construction and operational phases have been considered. No significant residual effects relating to dust emissions are anticipated and on this basis all identified residential, commercial and industrial properties and

tack emissions from the Scheme would not lead to any exceedances of statutory air effect on air quality is not

gen concentrations and nitrogen deposition rates at statutory ecological sites were also assessed to be insignificant.

All potential air quality cumulative impacts of the Scheme alongside the MBP and the

of the Scheme, a Dust Management Plan (DMP) would be developed and incorporated into an overall

CEMP is provided in

Appendix 17.1 to the ES. of enclosed chutes and covered skips and regular monitoring to ensure compliance.

4.62 In terms of the operational phase, no mitigation measures are proposed in addition to

those already incorporated in the Scheme design, such as the use of an appropriate Stack height. CCGT technology is inherently clean and the use of natural gas as a fuelensures that stringent emissions limits for oxides of nitrogen and carbon will be met. An Environmental Permit will be required to operate the Scheme.

4.63 The number of vehicular movements

negligible. As such, no further mitigation beyond those measures at the national level to control vehicle emissions are required.

4.64 The ES concludes that there would be no significant adverse

Scheme in respect of air quality. On this basis, threquirements of national and local planning policy in relation to air quality and emissions.

BIODIVERSITY AND GEOLOGICAL CONSERVATION (NPS EN 4.65 Para. 5.3.3 of EN-1 states that an ES should clearly

nationally and locally designated sites of ecological or geological conservation importance, on protected species and on habitats and other species identified as being of principal importance for the conservation oapplicants to ‘assess the stability of the ground conditions associated with the pipeline route and incorporate the findings of that assessment in the ES’.

Biodiversity 4.66 In accordance with Reg 5(2)(l)

(document reference 6.2would have on statutory and nonthe habitats of protected species, impEffects associated with the Scheme have been considered for the construction, operational and decommissioning phases.

4.67 The requirement for the ES to include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral

part of the Scheme is highlighted in pararequirement, Chapter with the Scheme. These include the timing of works to avoid the bird nesting season, the use of noise management measures to prevent disturbance or damage to a temporary summer bat roost, reinforced boundary planting that will provide enhanced corridors fowildlife and the introduction of native marginal planting around a surface water attenuation pond. Such measures willsecured by way of a Requirement in


the ES. The DMP will include measures such as water suppression, use of enclosed chutes and covered skips and regular monitoring to ensure compliance.

In terms of the operational phase, no mitigation measures are proposed in addition to those already incorporated in the Scheme design, such as the use of an appropriate

tack height. CCGT technology is inherently clean and the use of natural gas as a fuelensures that stringent emissions limits for oxides of nitrogen and carbon will be met. An Environmental Permit will be required to operate the Scheme.

of vehicular movements generated during the operational phase is no further mitigation beyond those measures at the national level to

control vehicle emissions are required.

concludes that there would be no significant adverse effectsScheme in respect of air quality. On this basis, the Scheme requirements of national and local planning policy in relation to air quality and

OGICAL CONSERVATION (NPS EN-1, 5.3 AND NPS EN

1 states that an ES should clearly set out ‘any effects on internationally, nationally and locally designated sites of ecological or geological conservation importance, on protected species and on habitats and other species identified as being of principal importance for the conservation of biodiversity’. Para. 2.23.2 of EN

‘assess the stability of the ground conditions associated with the pipeline route and incorporate the findings of that assessment in the ES’.

In accordance with Reg 5(2)(l) of the APFP Regulations 2009, C(document reference 6.2.11) provides an assessment of any effects that the Scheme would have on statutory and non-statutory nature conservation sites and features and the habitats of protected species, important features and other diversity features.

associated with the Scheme have been considered for the construction, operational and decommissioning phases.

The requirement for the ES to include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral is highlighted in para. 5.3.18 of EN-1. In com

hapter 11 of the ES identifies a number of mitigation measures associated with the Scheme. These include the timing of works to avoid the bird nesting season, the use of noise management measures to prevent disturbance or damage to a temporary

reinforced boundary planting that will provide enhanced corridors foand the introduction of native marginal planting around a surface water

Such measures will be provided for in the CEMP and secured by way of a Requirement in Schedule 2 of the Order.


51

The DMP will include measures such as water suppression, use of enclosed chutes and covered skips and regular monitoring to ensure compliance.

In terms of the operational phase, no mitigation measures are proposed in addition to those already incorporated in the Scheme design, such as the use of an appropriate

tack height. CCGT technology is inherently clean and the use of natural gas as a fuel ensures that stringent emissions limits for oxides of nitrogen and carbon will be met. An

during the operational phase is no further mitigation beyond those measures at the national level to

effects associated with the e Scheme complies with the

requirements of national and local planning policy in relation to air quality and

1, 5.3 AND NPS EN-4 2.23)

any effects on internationally, nationally and locally designated sites of ecological or geological conservation importance, on protected species and on habitats and other species identified as being of

Para. 2.23.2 of EN-4 requires ‘assess the stability of the ground conditions associated with the pipeline

of the APFP Regulations 2009, Chapter 11 of the ES ) provides an assessment of any effects that the Scheme

statutory nature conservation sites and features and ortant features and other diversity features.

associated with the Scheme have been considered for the construction,

The requirement for the ES to include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral 1. In compliance with this

of the ES identifies a number of mitigation measures associated with the Scheme. These include the timing of works to avoid the bird nesting season, the use of noise management measures to prevent disturbance or damage to a temporary

reinforced boundary planting that will provide enhanced corridors for and the introduction of native marginal planting around a surface water

provided for in the CEMP and have been


52

4.68 Subject to the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the Scheme would

not result in any significant adverse effects on the integrity of any designated site for nature conservation.

4.69 Site preparation will result in the loss of some exis

However, these habitats will either be replaced or subject to through the implementation of landscape significant effects on the habitats within the Oralso ensure that the Scheme would not result in any significant effects on the conservation status of any legally protected or notable species.

Geological conservation 4.70 In accordance with both EN

condition assessment covering the construction, operation and decommissioning of the Scheme.

4.71 Mitigation inherent to the Scheme include

areas where disturbance of idemitigation measures will be secured through the CEMP (include measures such as appropriate method statements for the protection of construction workers and develo

4.72 Subject to the identified mitigation measures, no potential significant adverse effects on

geological conservation interests have been identified. In the case of the operational phase, minor beneficial effects are anticipated associated with the removal of contaminated material, placement of hardstanding and implementation of a formalised drainage system.

4.73 The overall conclusion that there would be no significant effects

measures, confirms that the Scheme accords with relevant national and local planning policy in respect of biodiversity and geological conservation.

CIVIL AND MILITARY AVIATION AND DEFENCE INTERESTS (EN 4.74 Para. 5.4.1 of EN-1 states that ‘

and other types of defence interests can be affected by new energy development’. 5.4.10 of EN-1 advises that ‘or military aviation and/or other defence assets an assessment of potential effects should be set out in the ES’.

4.75 By virtue of its scale and size, the Scheme would not affect any civil and military aviation

and defence interests. In accordance with parawere consulted as part of the statutory consultation for the Scheme. Details of this

PLANNING STATEMENT

Subject to the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the Scheme would not result in any significant adverse effects on the integrity of any designated site for

Site preparation will result in the loss of some existing habitats within the Order Limits. However, these habitats will either be replaced or subject to compensatory planting through the implementation of landscape strategy. On this basis, there would be no significant effects on the habitats within the Order Limits. The landscape strategyalso ensure that the Scheme would not result in any significant effects on the conservation status of any legally protected or notable species.

In accordance with both EN-1 and EN-4, Chapter 13 of the ES presents a ground condition assessment covering the construction, operation and decommissioning of the

Mitigation inherent to the Scheme includes siting the Power Station Complex areas where disturbance of identified historic contaminated areas might arise. Additional mitigation measures will be secured through the CEMP (Appendix 17.1include measures such as appropriate method statements for the protection of construction workers and development of a methodology to address remedial actions.

Subject to the identified mitigation measures, no potential significant adverse effects on geological conservation interests have been identified. In the case of the operational

cial effects are anticipated associated with the removal of contaminated material, placement of hardstanding and implementation of a formalised

conclusion that there would be no significant effects, subject to mitigationmeasures, confirms that the Scheme accords with relevant national and local planning policy in respect of biodiversity and geological conservation.

CIVIL AND MILITARY AVIATION AND DEFENCE INTERESTS (EN-1, 5.4)

1 states that ‘Civil and military aerodromes, aviation and technical sites, and other types of defence interests can be affected by new energy development’.

1 advises that ‘where the proposed development may have an effect on civil n and/or other defence assets an assessment of potential effects should

By virtue of its scale and size, the Scheme would not affect any civil and military aviation and defence interests. In accordance with para. 5.4.11 of EN-1, the MoD, CAA and NATS were consulted as part of the statutory consultation for the Scheme. Details of this

Subject to the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, the Scheme would not result in any significant adverse effects on the integrity of any designated site for

ting habitats within the Order Limits. compensatory planting

there would be no landscape strategy would

also ensure that the Scheme would not result in any significant effects on the

13 of the ES presents a ground condition assessment covering the construction, operation and decommissioning of the

the Power Station Complex away from ntified historic contaminated areas might arise. Additional

Appendix 17.1 of the ES) and will include measures such as appropriate method statements for the protection of

pment of a methodology to address remedial actions.

Subject to the identified mitigation measures, no potential significant adverse effects on geological conservation interests have been identified. In the case of the operational

cial effects are anticipated associated with the removal of contaminated material, placement of hardstanding and implementation of a formalised

, subject to mitigation measures, confirms that the Scheme accords with relevant national and local planning

Civil and military aerodromes, aviation and technical sites, and other types of defence interests can be affected by new energy development’. Para.

where the proposed development may have an effect on civil n and/or other defence assets an assessment of potential effects should

By virtue of its scale and size, the Scheme would not affect any civil and military aviation 1, the MoD, CAA and NATS

were consulted as part of the statutory consultation for the Scheme. Details of this

consultation and MEL’s responses are provided in the Consultation Report (reference 5.1). No licensed or unlicensed aerodromes are likelScheme. The MoD and CAA confirmed in their have no objection to the civil and military aviation and defence interests.

DUST, ODOUR, ARTIFICIAL LIGHT, SMOKE, STEAM AND INSECT INFESTATION (EN 4.76 Para. 5.6.4 of EN-1 advises that applicants should ‘

infestation and emissions of odour, dust, steam, smoke and artificial light to have a detrimental impact on amenity, as part of the Environmental Statement’.

4.77 A dust management plan (DMP) would be incorporated as part

Scheme. Chapter 8 of the ES has assessed the air quality implications arising from the Scheme, including dust. The overall conclusions of a DMP, there would not be any significant adverse effects the Order Limits.

4.78 The lighting of fires and the burning of waste materials will

construction activities. 4.79 During the operational phase, the

Environmental Permit.Scheme would not lead to any exceedences of statutory air receptors. The effect of

4.80 Chapter 10 of the ES

artificial lighting associated with the Scheme, and proposes measures to minimise light pollution during the construction and operationOrder by means of a 3.1).

4.81 The Scheme would not be susceptible to insect infestation because it would not handle

organic materials likely to attract insects. Good site practices during the and operational phases relating to refuse and foodstuffs (where relevant) would prevent any likelihood of insect infestation.

4.82 In conclusion, no significant dust, odour, artificial light, smoke, steam or insect

infestation effects are antici


consultation and MEL’s responses are provided in the Consultation Report (). No licensed or unlicensed aerodromes are likely to be affected by the

Scheme. The MoD and CAA confirmed in their statutory consultation responses that they have no objection to the Scheme. In summary, the Scheme is acceptable in respect of civil and military aviation and defence interests.

DOUR, ARTIFICIAL LIGHT, SMOKE, STEAM AND INSECT INFESTATION (EN

1 advises that applicants should ‘assess the potential for insect infestation and emissions of odour, dust, steam, smoke and artificial light to have a detrimental impact on amenity, as part of the Environmental Statement’.

A dust management plan (DMP) would be incorporated as part Scheme. Chapter 8 of the ES has assessed the air quality implications arising from the Scheme, including dust. The overall conclusions are that, subject to the implementation

there would not be any significant adverse effects of dust deposition beyond

and the burning of waste materials will not be permittedconstruction activities.

During the operational phase, the Stack emissions would be controlled by an . Chapter 8 of the ES confirms that the Stack emissions from the

would not lead to any exceedences of statutory air quality receptors. The effect of Stack emissions is therefore not significant.

(Landscape and Visual) has assessed the potential effects of the artificial lighting associated with the Scheme, and proposes measures to minimise light pollution during the construction and operation. Such measures are provided for in

r by means of a Requirement (see Schedule 2 of the Order, document reference

The Scheme would not be susceptible to insect infestation because it would not handle organic materials likely to attract insects. Good site practices during the

operational phases relating to refuse and foodstuffs (where relevant) would prevent any likelihood of insect infestation.

In conclusion, no significant dust, odour, artificial light, smoke, steam or insect infestation effects are anticipated to be caused by the Scheme.


53

consultation and MEL’s responses are provided in the Consultation Report (document y to be affected by the

consultation responses that they . In summary, the Scheme is acceptable in respect of

DOUR, ARTIFICIAL LIGHT, SMOKE, STEAM AND INSECT INFESTATION (EN-1, 5.6)

assess the potential for insect infestation and emissions of odour, dust, steam, smoke and artificial light to have a detrimental impact on amenity, as part of the Environmental Statement’.

A dust management plan (DMP) would be incorporated as part of the CEMP for the Scheme. Chapter 8 of the ES has assessed the air quality implications arising from the

subject to the implementation dust deposition beyond

not be permitted for any

would be controlled by an tack emissions from the

quality criteria at sensitive tack emissions is therefore not significant.

has assessed the potential effects of the artificial lighting associated with the Scheme, and proposes measures to minimise light

Such measures are provided for in the (see Schedule 2 of the Order, document reference

The Scheme would not be susceptible to insect infestation because it would not handle organic materials likely to attract insects. Good site practices during the construction

operational phases relating to refuse and foodstuffs (where relevant) would prevent

In conclusion, no significant dust, odour, artificial light, smoke, steam or insect


54

FLOOD RISK (NPS EN-1, 5.7) 4.83 In accordance with Section 5.7 of EN

Assessment (FRA) (document referenceas defined by the Environment Agency (EA).

4.84 The FRA concludes that there would be no significant risks of flooding associated with

the Scheme arising from the following:

• river flooding (fluvial) -would be at a low risk from fluvial flooding;

• coastal/tidal flooding -

• sewer flooding - there is no active sewer network within the Order Limits;

• infrastructure failure floodingthe Scheme is not subject to the potential floo

4.85 Any risks associated with

drainage strategy to control the management of surface water runimpermeable areas proposed within the Order Limits. Stafford Borough Council and the Environment Agency identified that there has been no known groundwater flooding problems

4.86 A risk of overland/pluvial flooding can arise where there is an increase in impermeable

areas across a site. The FRA proposes that all runusing a piped system via a retention pond and control chamber Plans (work numbered 6) document reference discharging downstream via a pipe into the River Trent. The site specific drainage strategy for the Scheme will be managed to allow all surface water from the MEC to drain into the River Trent.

4.87 The simulation results presented in the FRA show that there is no potential for flooding

up to and including the 1 in 100 year +20% rainfall event. On thisrun-off would not increase the overland flooding risk to or from the Scheme.

4.88 The Scheme is considered to be at a low flooding risk from the Trent and Mersey Canal

associated with overtopping in extreme rainfall events. The basis that the canal contains banks that present a peak in the topography which would contain the majority of water associated with an unusual rise in the water level of the canal the risk is mitigated by the presence of an ov

4.89 The FRA identifies no significant flooding effects associated with the Scheme, subject to

the implementation of the Foul and Surface Water DScheme accords with EN-1 in terms o

PLANNING STATEMENT

In accordance with Section 5.7 of EN-1, the Application is accompanied byument reference 5.4). The Scheme is located within Flood Zone 1

as defined by the Environment Agency (EA).

The FRA concludes that there would be no significant risks of flooding associated with the Scheme arising from the following:

- all of the Scheme is located within Flood Zone 1 and therefore would be at a low risk from fluvial flooding;

the Scheme is not located near the coast;

here is no active sewer network within the Order Limits;

infrastructure failure flooding (with the exception of the Trent and Mersey Canal) the Scheme is not subject to the potential flood risk from reservoirs or lakes.

Any risks associated with surface water flooding would be managed by a site specific drainage strategy to control the management of surface water runimpermeable areas proposed within the Order Limits. Additionally, cStafford Borough Council and the Environment Agency identified that there has been no

oundwater flooding problems historically within the Order Limits.

A risk of overland/pluvial flooding can arise where there is an increase in impermeable areas across a site. The FRA proposes that all run-off from the Scheme

piped system via a retention pond and control chamber (shown on the Works Plans (work numbered 6) document reference 2.3) into a private network ultimately discharging downstream via a pipe into the River Trent. The site specific drainage

Scheme will be managed to allow all surface water from the MEC to drain into the River Trent.

The simulation results presented in the FRA show that there is no potential for flooding up to and including the 1 in 100 year +20% rainfall event. On this basis, the surface water

off would not increase the overland flooding risk to or from the Scheme.

The Scheme is considered to be at a low flooding risk from the Trent and Mersey Canal associated with overtopping in extreme rainfall events. The risk is considered low on the basis that the canal contains banks that present a peak in the topography which would contain the majority of water associated with an unusual rise in the water level of the

the risk is mitigated by the presence of an overspill adjacent to canal bridge 102

identifies no significant flooding effects associated with the Scheme, subject to the Foul and Surface Water Drainage Strategy. On this basis the

1 in terms of flood risk.

pplication is accompanied by a Flood Risk ). The Scheme is located within Flood Zone 1

The FRA concludes that there would be no significant risks of flooding associated with

the Scheme is located within Flood Zone 1 and therefore

here is no active sewer network within the Order Limits;

of the Trent and Mersey Canal) - d risk from reservoirs or lakes.

flooding would be managed by a site specific drainage strategy to control the management of surface water run-off from the

Additionally, consultation with Stafford Borough Council and the Environment Agency identified that there has been no

within the Order Limits.

A risk of overland/pluvial flooding can arise where there is an increase in impermeable from the Scheme would be drained

(shown on the Works into a private network ultimately

discharging downstream via a pipe into the River Trent. The site specific drainage Scheme will be managed to allow all surface water from the MEC to

The simulation results presented in the FRA show that there is no potential for flooding basis, the surface water

off would not increase the overland flooding risk to or from the Scheme.

The Scheme is considered to be at a low flooding risk from the Trent and Mersey Canal risk is considered low on the

basis that the canal contains banks that present a peak in the topography which would contain the majority of water associated with an unusual rise in the water level of the

erspill adjacent to canal bridge 102.

identifies no significant flooding effects associated with the Scheme, subject to trategy. On this basis the

HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT (EN 4.90 Section 5.8 of EN-1 recognises that the construction, operation and decommissioning of

energy infrastructure has the potential to result in adverse effects on the historic environment. Policy N9: Borough (June 2014) advises that development proposals that would affect the significance of a heritage asset should provide sufficient information for that impact to be assessed.

4.91 In accordance with Reg 5(2)(m) of the APFP Regulations 2009,

(document reference 6.2would have on statutory and nonincluding scheduled monuments, World structures, archaeological sites and registered battlefields.

4.92 Consistent with the advice provided by para

of the significance of each of the identified heritage assets and the contribution of setting to their significance.designation does not imply lower siapproach and has been informed by consultation with relevant consultees such as the historic environment teamrelevant historic sources such as t

4.93 Para. 5.8.14 of EN-1 states that there ‘

conservation of designated heritage assets and the more significant the designated heritage asset, the greater the presump5.8.14 also defines harm, advising that ‘alteration or destruction of the heritage asset or development within its setting’further advises that instances park or garden should be exceptional. Instances of substantial harm to or loss of designated assets of the highest significance and II* listed buildings

4.94 In instances of harm, para. 5.8.15 of EN

of a designated heritage asset should be weighed against the public benefit of development, recognising that the greater that harm to the significance of the heritage asset the greater the justification will be needed for any loss’. lead to substantial harm, ENdemonstrated that the substantial harm to or loss of significance is necessary in order to deliver substantial public benefits that outweigh that loss or harm.

4.95 The ES has considered both the potential for direct physical impacts and indirect effects

on the setting of identified assets. In terms of designated heritage assetsidentifies heritage assets within Impact Report site boundary


HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT (EN-1, 5.8)

recognises that the construction, operation and decommissioning of energy infrastructure has the potential to result in adverse effects on the historic

N9: Historic Environment of the adopted Local Plan for Stafford Borough (June 2014) advises that development proposals that would affect the significance of a heritage asset should provide sufficient information for that impact to

ance with Reg 5(2)(m) of the APFP Regulations 2009, (document reference 6.2.12) provides an assessment of any effects that the Scheme would have on statutory and non-statutory sites or features of the historic environment,

heduled monuments, World Heritage Sites, listed buildings and other historic structures, archaeological sites and registered battlefields.

Consistent with the advice provided by para. 5.8.8 of EN-1, the ES provides a description of the significance of each of the identified heritage assets and the contribution of setting to their significance. Para. 5.8.4 of EN-1 recognises that an absence of formal designation does not imply lower significance. The ES assessment is consistent with this approach and has been informed by consultation with relevant consultees such as the historic environment team at Staffordshire County Council and throughrelevant historic sources such as the Staffordshire Historic Environment Record.

1 states that there ‘should be a presumption in favour of the conservation of designated heritage assets and the more significant the designated heritage asset, the greater the presumption in favour of its conservation should be’. 5.8.14 also defines harm, advising that ‘significance can be harmed or lost through alteration or destruction of the heritage asset or development within its setting’further advises that instances of substantial harm to or loss of a grade II listed buildingpark or garden should be exceptional. Instances of substantial harm to or loss of designated assets of the highest significance including scheduled m

s and registered parks and gardens should be wholly exceptional.

In instances of harm, para. 5.8.15 of EN-1 states ‘any harmful impact on the significance of a designated heritage asset should be weighed against the public benefit of

ising that the greater that harm to the significance of the heritage asset the greater the justification will be needed for any loss’. Where a development will lead to substantial harm, EN-1 advises that consent should be refused unless it can be

ated that the substantial harm to or loss of significance is necessary in order to deliver substantial public benefits that outweigh that loss or harm.

has considered both the potential for direct physical impacts and indirect effects setting of identified assets. In terms of designated heritage assets

assets within a 3km study area from the Preliminary Environmental Impact Report site boundary, including scheduled ancient monuments


55

recognises that the construction, operation and decommissioning of energy infrastructure has the potential to result in adverse effects on the historic

Local Plan for Stafford Borough (June 2014) advises that development proposals that would affect the significance of a heritage asset should provide sufficient information for that impact to

ance with Reg 5(2)(m) of the APFP Regulations 2009, Chapter 12 of the ES ) provides an assessment of any effects that the Scheme

statutory sites or features of the historic environment, eritage Sites, listed buildings and other historic

1, the ES provides a description of the significance of each of the identified heritage assets and the contribution of

1 recognises that an absence of formal gnificance. The ES assessment is consistent with this

approach and has been informed by consultation with relevant consultees such as the at Staffordshire County Council and through a review of

he Staffordshire Historic Environment Record.

should be a presumption in favour of the conservation of designated heritage assets and the more significant the designated

tion in favour of its conservation should be’. Para. significance can be harmed or lost through

alteration or destruction of the heritage asset or development within its setting’. It of substantial harm to or loss of a grade II listed building,

park or garden should be exceptional. Instances of substantial harm to or loss of including scheduled monuments, grade I

d registered parks and gardens should be wholly exceptional.

any harmful impact on the significance of a designated heritage asset should be weighed against the public benefit of

ising that the greater that harm to the significance of the heritage Where a development will

1 advises that consent should be refused unless it can be ated that the substantial harm to or loss of significance is necessary in order to

deliver substantial public benefits that outweigh that loss or harm.

has considered both the potential for direct physical impacts and indirect effects setting of identified assets. In terms of designated heritage assets, the ES

from the Preliminary Environmental scheduled ancient monuments, listed buildings,


56

registered parks and gardens also been identified within the

4.96 In terms of archaeological potential, the construction, operation and

the two former coal-fired power stations on the potential for the presence of unknown archaeological remains within the footprint of the Scheme.

4.97 The results of the assessment identify that the only adverse effects

relate to slight adverse effects on the Trent and Mersey Canal Conservation Area and its associated structures. In addition, neutral to slight adverse effects are predicted for the setting of Meaford Conservation Area and Meaford Hall the temporary visual presence of the Complex during the construction phase.

4.98 In terms of mitigation, MEL proposes to restore the existing

Bridge 101 (Malkin’s Bridge), which crosses the Trent and Mersey Canal, which has suffered damage. The reinforcement of the extent of the Order Limits will help to contain views across the and Mersey Canal Conservation Area.

4.99 The main effects on heritage interests during the operational phase relate to the visual

presence of the Scheme (particularly its tall elements) resulting in indirect effects on the setting of heritage receptors. receptors relating to Outlanes Mill Farmhouse Area, Trentham Historic Park and Garden and the Trent and Mersey Canal Conservation Area and associated listed structures. All assessed as insignificant.

4.100 Potential decommissioning effects on cultural heritage assets are predicted to be similar

or less than those predicted for the construction phase. 4.101 Overall the Scheme is predicted to result in limited changes to the historic environment

that would not amount to significant effects. No effects would be more than slight adverse and therefore would not constitute ‘substantial’ harm under the terms of para5.18.14 of EN-1.

4.102 Consistent with the advice contained within para

harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the Scheme, greater the negative effect on the significance of the designated heritage assegreater the benefits that will be needed to justify approval.

4.103 On the basis that the ES assessment predicts that harm arising from the Scheme is

assessed as no more than slight adverse and not substantialpublic benefits described in C

PLANNING STATEMENT

and gardens and conservation areas. Undesignated heritage been identified within the same 3km study area.

In terms of archaeological potential, the construction, operation and decommissioningfired power stations on the MBP Site would have removed all

potential for the presence of unknown archaeological remains within the footprint of the

The results of the assessment identify that the only adverse effects during construction relate to slight adverse effects on the Trent and Mersey Canal Conservation Area and its

addition, neutral to slight adverse effects are predicted for the setting of Meaford Conservation Area and Meaford Hall Park Listed Building arising from

visual presence of the cranes used for elements of the Power Station Complex during the construction phase.

MEL proposes to restore the existing northern101 (Malkin’s Bridge), which crosses the Trent and Mersey Canal, which has

suffered damage. The reinforcement of the existing tree groups of the Order Limits will help to contain views across the MBP Site from the Trent

y Canal Conservation Area.

The main effects on heritage interests during the operational phase relate to the visual presence of the Scheme (particularly its tall elements) resulting in indirect effects on the setting of heritage receptors. Slight adverse impacts are predicted for four heritage receptors relating to Outlanes Mill Farmhouse listed building, Meaford Conservation Area, Trentham Historic Park and Garden and the Trent and Mersey Canal Conservation Area and associated listed structures. All potential operational effects have been

Potential decommissioning effects on cultural heritage assets are predicted to be similar or less than those predicted for the construction phase.

predicted to result in limited changes to the historic environment that would not amount to significant effects. No effects would be more than slight adverse and therefore would not constitute ‘substantial’ harm under the terms of para

Consistent with the advice contained within para. 5.8.15 of EN-1, this nonharm should be weighed against the public benefits of the Scheme, greater the negative effect on the significance of the designated heritage assegreater the benefits that will be needed to justify approval.

On the basis that the ES assessment predicts that harm arising from the Scheme is assessed as no more than slight adverse and not substantial, it is considered that the

described in Chapter 5 of this Planning Statement would outweigh the

heritage assets have

decommissioning of would have removed all

potential for the presence of unknown archaeological remains within the footprint of the

during construction relate to slight adverse effects on the Trent and Mersey Canal Conservation Area and its

addition, neutral to slight adverse effects are predicted for the Park Listed Building arising from elements of the Power Station

northern parapet on Canal 101 (Malkin’s Bridge), which crosses the Trent and Mersey Canal, which has

along the eastern Site from the Trent

The main effects on heritage interests during the operational phase relate to the visual presence of the Scheme (particularly its tall elements) resulting in indirect effects on the

erse impacts are predicted for four heritage , Meaford Conservation

Area, Trentham Historic Park and Garden and the Trent and Mersey Canal Conservation potential operational effects have been

Potential decommissioning effects on cultural heritage assets are predicted to be similar

predicted to result in limited changes to the historic environment that would not amount to significant effects. No effects would be more than slight adverse and therefore would not constitute ‘substantial’ harm under the terms of para.

1, this non-substantial harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the Scheme, allowing that the greater the negative effect on the significance of the designated heritage asset, the

On the basis that the ES assessment predicts that harm arising from the Scheme is t is considered that the

tatement would outweigh the

limited identified harm. It is concluded that in respect of the historic environment the Scheme would comply with relevant national and local planning policy.

LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL (NPS EN 4.104 A landscape and visual

The LVIA findings are presented in ChEN-1, the LVIA has cmaintenance and decommissioning of the Scheme. The assessment responds also to relevant guidance in ENCharacter.

4.105 Para. 2.6.5 of EN-2 acknowledges that ‘

associated with a fossil fuel generating system. Mitigation is therefore to reduce the visual intrusion of the buildings in the landscape and minimise impact on visual amenas far as reasonably practicable’. effects associated with new pipelines are likely to be limited to impacts on landscape features and vegetation over or adjacent to the pipeline and structures necidentify the pipeline and provide it with access.

4.106 MEL’s Design and Access Statement (

has been designed in order to minimise its landscape and visual impact. mitigation measures include the planting of new broadleaved species along the eastern extent of the Order Limit

4.107 In addition, the CEMP would incorporate a number of management practices that would

help to minimise adversemeasures include the implementation of tree protective fencing for retained vegetation prior to construction and the use of solid hoardings to screen the construction activityvisually.

4.108 Significant effects during construction are predicted for a number of visual receptors

including some residential propertiesvisual receptors along the A34 or due to the elevated position of neway. Construction activity at range from the Trent and Mersey Canal and therefore significant temporary effects on the canal are predicted. Intervening landform and vegetatiof the construction activity for nearby receptors, with the exception of the upper sections of cranes.

4.109 The residual effects arising from construction are assessed as having no significant

impact on landscape character.activity in relation to the


identified harm. It is concluded that in respect of the historic environment the Scheme would comply with relevant national and local planning policy.

NPS EN-1, 5.9, NPS EN-2, 2.6 AND NPS EN-4, 2.21

A landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) of the Scheme has been VIA findings are presented in Chapter 10 of the ES. As required by parathe LVIA has considered impacts associated with the construction, operation

and decommissioning of the Scheme. The assessment responds also to relevant guidance in EN-1, EN-2 and EN-4 and local planning policy;

2 acknowledges that ‘it is not possible to eliminate the visual impacts associated with a fossil fuel generating system. Mitigation is therefore to reduce the visual intrusion of the buildings in the landscape and minimise impact on visual amenas far as reasonably practicable’. Section 2.21 of EN-4 advises that landscape and visual effects associated with new pipelines are likely to be limited to impacts on landscape features and vegetation over or adjacent to the pipeline and structures necidentify the pipeline and provide it with access.

Design and Access Statement (document reference 5.3) explainshas been designed in order to minimise its landscape and visual impact. mitigation measures include the planting of new broadleaved species along the eastern

mits to enhance the existing screening.

the CEMP would incorporate a number of management practices that would adverse landscape and visual effects during construction. These

measures include the implementation of tree protective fencing for retained vegetation prior to construction and the use of solid hoardings to screen the construction activity

Significant effects during construction are predicted for a number of visual receptorsing some residential properties. This is principally due to the proximity of these

visual receptors along the A34 or due to the elevated position of neway. Construction activity at Canal Bridge 101 (Malkin’s Bridge) would be visible at close range from the Trent and Mersey Canal and therefore significant temporary effects on

anal are predicted. Intervening landform and vegetation would screen the majority of the construction activity for nearby receptors, with the exception of the upper

The residual effects arising from construction are assessed as having no significant impact on landscape character. This is due to the very minor scale of the construction activity in relation to the scale and character of the surrounding landscape.


57

identified harm. It is concluded that in respect of the historic environment the Scheme would comply with relevant national and local planning policy.

4, 2.21)

assessment (LVIA) of the Scheme has been undertaken. of the ES. As required by para. 5.9.6 of

onsidered impacts associated with the construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Scheme. The assessment responds also to

4 and local planning policy; Policy N8: Landscape

it is not possible to eliminate the visual impacts associated with a fossil fuel generating system. Mitigation is therefore to reduce the visual intrusion of the buildings in the landscape and minimise impact on visual amenity

4 advises that landscape and visual effects associated with new pipelines are likely to be limited to impacts on landscape features and vegetation over or adjacent to the pipeline and structures necessary to

explains how the Scheme has been designed in order to minimise its landscape and visual impact. Inherent mitigation measures include the planting of new broadleaved species along the eastern

the CEMP would incorporate a number of management practices that would landscape and visual effects during construction. These

measures include the implementation of tree protective fencing for retained vegetation prior to construction and the use of solid hoardings to screen the construction activity

Significant effects during construction are predicted for a number of visual receptors, . This is principally due to the proximity of these

visual receptors along the A34 or due to the elevated position of nearby public rights of would be visible at close

range from the Trent and Mersey Canal and therefore significant temporary effects on on would screen the majority

of the construction activity for nearby receptors, with the exception of the upper

The residual effects arising from construction are assessed as having no significant This is due to the very minor scale of the construction

landscape.


58

4.110 Due to the height of some of the infrastructure located within the Power Station Complex, there would be operational phase. This is due principally to the introduction of new built form, visible above the MBP boundary vegetation. These receptors include residential properties along the A34 and recreational usSome significant effects are also predicted cumulativelyalongside programmed A34 road improvements and the MBP.

4.111 Whilst a number of signif

accordance with para. 5.9.15 of ENwhether these adverse impacts would be so damaging that they are not offset by the benefits of the Scheme, includiOn the basis of the assessment provided in the ES, case.

4.112 As explained in the Design and Access Statement all elements of the Scheme have been

subject to design consideration and assessment. Subject to the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, it is concluded that the Scheme would be acceptable in terms of its landscape and visual effects.

4.113 In addition, it should be noted

in the Green Belt and is already the subject of employment use.

LAND USE INCLUDING OPEN SPACE, GREEN INFRASTRUCTUREAND GREEN BELT (EN-1, 5.10 AND EN 4.114 Para. 5.10.1 of EN-1 recognises that energy infrastructure projects will have direct effects

on the existing use of sites and indirect effects on the use, or planned use of land in the vicinity for other types of development. generating stations have large land footprints and can only be sited on suitably sized sites.

4.115 Para. 5.10.4 of EN-1 refers explicitly to green belts, stating that the ‘

green belt policy is to prevent urimportant attribute of green belts is their openness’.

4.116 As noted in the previous

Stafford Borough (adopted 2014) within the Green Belt. Policy E5 identifies ‘where limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment will be supported for employment purposes’. This policy accords with thwhich states that ‘infilling or redevelopment of major developed sites in the

PLANNING STATEMENT

Due to the height of some of the infrastructure located within the Power Station Complex, there would be significant effects for number of visual receptors during the operational phase. This is due principally to the introduction of new built form, visible above the MBP boundary vegetation. These receptors include residential properties along the A34 and recreational users at Downs Bank and the Trent and Mersey Canal. Some significant effects are also predicted cumulatively during the operational stagealongside programmed A34 road improvements and the anticipated development of the

Whilst a number of significant landscape and visual effects have been predicted, in 5.9.15 of EN-1, these impacts must be judged on the basis of

whether these adverse impacts would be so damaging that they are not offset by the , including the national need for new power generation capacity

On the basis of the assessment provided in the ES, it is concluded that

As explained in the Design and Access Statement all elements of the Scheme have been ign consideration and assessment. Subject to the implementation of the

identified mitigation measures, it is concluded that the Scheme would be acceptable in terms of its landscape and visual effects.

noted that the MBP Site is allocated as a major development site and is already the subject of an extant planning permission

LAND USE INCLUDING OPEN SPACE, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 1, 5.10 AND EN-2, 2.2)

1 recognises that energy infrastructure projects will have direct effects on the existing use of sites and indirect effects on the use, or planned use of land in the vicinity for other types of development. Section 2.2 of EN-2 recognises that fossil fuel generating stations have large land footprints and can only be sited on suitably sized

1 refers explicitly to green belts, stating that the ‘fundamental aim of green belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open: the most important attribute of green belts is their openness’.

previous chapter of this Planning Statement, policy E5 of the Plan for (adopted 2014) identifies the MBP Site as a major developed site

. Policy E5 identifies the MBP Site as a previously developed site where limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment will be supported for

This policy accords with the advice of para. 5.10.11 of ENinfilling or redevelopment of major developed sites in the

Due to the height of some of the infrastructure located within the Power Station effects for number of visual receptors during the

operational phase. This is due principally to the introduction of new built form, visible above the MBP boundary vegetation. These receptors include residential properties

ers at Downs Bank and the Trent and Mersey Canal. during the operational stage

anticipated development of the

icant landscape and visual effects have been predicted, in these impacts must be judged on the basis of

whether these adverse impacts would be so damaging that they are not offset by the ng the national need for new power generation capacity.

it is concluded that this is not the

As explained in the Design and Access Statement all elements of the Scheme have been ign consideration and assessment. Subject to the implementation of the

identified mitigation measures, it is concluded that the Scheme would be acceptable in

a major development site planning permission for

1 recognises that energy infrastructure projects will have direct effects on the existing use of sites and indirect effects on the use, or planned use of land in the

recognises that fossil fuel generating stations have large land footprints and can only be sited on suitably sized

fundamental aim of ban sprawl by keeping land permanently open: the most

chapter of this Planning Statement, policy E5 of the Plan for as a major developed site

as a previously developed site where limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment will be supported for

e advice of para. 5.10.11 of EN-1, infilling or redevelopment of major developed sites in the green belt, if

identified as such by the local planning authority, may be suitable for energy infrastructure’.

4.117 Chapter 3 of the ES iden

Site, including its proximity to grid and gas connections and its relationship to surrounding land uses in terms of the physical characteristics of the generating station in accordance with

4.118 The selection of the MEC S

exists on the MBP for 110,000 sq m o 4.119 The Scheme would still allow

use, and it would not conflict either with Policy E5 or the existing planning permission for the redevelopment of of this Planning Statement, the Scheme would create direct and indirect employment and could potentially supply heat direct to future occupiers on MBP.

4.119 As a previously developed brownfield site, the

green infrastructure or land used for sports and recreational facilities. The would not prevent the continued use of the Trent and Mersey Canal or Bowls Club at the northern end of the purposes.

4.120 The MEC Site does not constitute agricultural land. On this basis

conflict with the advice contained within parasafeguard such sites and minimise land.

4.121 On this basis, the Scheme complies with the requirements of national and local planning

policy in respect of open space, green infrast NOISE AND VIBRATION (NPS EN 4.122 Section 2.7 of EN-2 recognises that there are noise and vibration effects associated with

fossil fuel generating stations. Section 5.11 of ENin adverse effects on a range of receptors including human life, wildlife and biodiversity. Section 2.20 of EN-4 advises that there are specific noise and vibration considerations that can apply to gas pipelines during the p

4.123 Chapter 9 of the ES assesses the noise and vibration effects of the Scheme during its

construction, operation and decommissioning phases. In accordance with the guidance contained in EN-1 and ENthe siting of the Power Station Complex to maximise separation distances sensitive receptors and the housing of process plants within noise


identified as such by the local planning authority, may be suitable for energy

of the ES identifies other factors that have influenced the selection of the Site, including its proximity to grid and gas connections and its relationship to surrounding land uses in terms of potential adverse effects. ES C

cteristics of the MEC Site that make it suitable for a fossil fuel generating station in accordance with Section 2.2 of EN-2.

MEC Site took into account the existing planning permission that 110,000 sq m of industrial and storage and distribution uses.

still allow the majority of the MBP Site to be useduse, and it would not conflict either with Policy E5 or the existing planning permission for the redevelopment of MBP Site. As demonstrated in Chapter 6 of the ES and Cof this Planning Statement, the Scheme would create direct and indirect employment and could potentially supply heat direct to future occupiers on MBP.

As a previously developed brownfield site, the MEC Site does not constitute open space, green infrastructure or land used for sports and recreational facilities. The would not prevent the continued use of the Trent and Mersey Canal or

lub at the northern end of the MBP Site for their established recreational

Site does not constitute agricultural land. On this basisconflict with the advice contained within paragraphs. 5.10.14- 16 ofsafeguard such sites and minimise the loss of the best and most versatile agricultural

On this basis, the Scheme complies with the requirements of national and local planning policy in respect of open space, green infrastructure and green belt.

NPS EN-1, 5.11 NPS EN-2, 2.7 AND NPS EN-4, 2.20

2 recognises that there are noise and vibration effects associated with fossil fuel generating stations. Section 5.11 of EN-1 notes that excessive noise can result in adverse effects on a range of receptors including human life, wildlife and biodiversity.

4 advises that there are specific noise and vibration considerations that can apply to gas pipelines during the pre-construction and construction phases.

of the ES assesses the noise and vibration effects of the Scheme during its construction, operation and decommissioning phases. In accordance with the guidance

1 and EN-2, the Scheme incorporates inherent mitigation in the form of the siting of the Power Station Complex to maximise separation distances sensitive receptors and the housing of process plants within noise-


59

identified as such by the local planning authority, may be suitable for energy

tifies other factors that have influenced the selection of the MEC Site, including its proximity to grid and gas connections and its relationship to

potential adverse effects. ES Chapter 3 also explains ite that make it suitable for a fossil fuel

ite took into account the existing planning permission that industrial and storage and distribution uses.

to be used for employment use, and it would not conflict either with Policy E5 or the existing planning permission for

6 of the ES and Chapter 3 of this Planning Statement, the Scheme would create direct and indirect employment and could potentially supply heat direct to future occupiers on MBP.

Site does not constitute open space, green infrastructure or land used for sports and recreational facilities. The Scheme would not prevent the continued use of the Trent and Mersey Canal or the Barlaston

for their established recreational

Site does not constitute agricultural land. On this basis, the Scheme is not in 16 of EN-1, which aims to

the best and most versatile agricultural

On this basis, the Scheme complies with the requirements of national and local planning ructure and green belt.

4, 2.20)

2 recognises that there are noise and vibration effects associated with that excessive noise can result

in adverse effects on a range of receptors including human life, wildlife and biodiversity. 4 advises that there are specific noise and vibration considerations

construction and construction phases.

of the ES assesses the noise and vibration effects of the Scheme during its construction, operation and decommissioning phases. In accordance with the guidance

e incorporates inherent mitigation in the form of the siting of the Power Station Complex to maximise separation distances from noise

-insulated buildings.


60

4.124 Additional mitigation mea

of best available techniques to minimise potential noise and vibration effects during construction. Where reasonable and practicable, the use of quieter plant and equipment will be preferred. Subject to these mitigation measures, the Scheme during the construction phase is anticipated to result in negligible noise and vibration effects at all residential receptors.

4.125 With respect to local recreational uses, Barlaston

minor adverse effects and Barlaston Whilst adverse effects resulting in an increase in ambient noise levels are predicted for the Trent and Mersey Canal, these effects would be short term athe nature of the construction works and the transient use of the canal by receptors.

4.126 All noise impacts from temporary construction traffic will be negligible. On this basis no

construction noise or vibration are expected to bedecommissioning are expected to be consistent with the predicted construction impacts

4.127 Subject to the identified mitigation measures, operational noise effects would be

negligible at all noise sensitive receptors. All oWorld Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines to avoid or minimise annoyance.

4.128 Cumulative noise effects of the

and the SCC Highway Workssignificant cumulative noise impacts.

4.129 Para. 5.11.9 of EN-1 states that development consent will not be granted unless

significant adverse noise impacts on health and quality of life are avoided and other adverse impacts are mitigated or minimised. The paragraphdecision maker must be satisfied that, where possible, proposals contribute to improvements to health and quality of life through the effective management and control of noise.

4.130 In these terms, the Scheme complies with the aims and requirements of EN

Mitigation measures to minimise and manage potential noise and vibration effects throughout all project phases have also been fully detailed within the ES. The ES has demonstrated that the Scheme will not result in any significant noise and vibration effects.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC (EN-1, 5.12) 4.131 Para. 5.12.1 of EN-1 states that

energy infrastructure may have socioLocal planning policy within by supporting the location, diversity and intensity of new economic development.

PLANNING STATEMENT

Additional mitigation measures include the implementation of a CEMP alongside the use of best available techniques to minimise potential noise and vibration effects during construction. Where reasonable and practicable, the use of quieter plant and equipment

bject to these mitigation measures, the Scheme during the construction phase is anticipated to result in negligible noise and vibration effects at all

With respect to local recreational uses, Barlaston Bowls Club is anticipatminor adverse effects and Barlaston Golf Club negligible impacts during construction. Whilst adverse effects resulting in an increase in ambient noise levels are predicted for the Trent and Mersey Canal, these effects would be short term and temporary due to the nature of the construction works and the transient use of the canal by receptors.

All noise impacts from temporary construction traffic will be negligible. On this basis no construction noise or vibration are expected to be significant. Effects during decommissioning are expected to be consistent with the predicted construction impacts

Subject to the identified mitigation measures, operational noise effects would be negligible at all noise sensitive receptors. All operational noise levels would be within World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines to avoid or minimise annoyance.

Cumulative noise effects of the Scheme in conjunction with the development of thethe SCC Highway Works are predicted to be no more than minor, resulting in no

significant cumulative noise impacts.

1 states that development consent will not be granted unless significant adverse noise impacts on health and quality of life are avoided and other

itigated or minimised. The paragraph advises must be satisfied that, where possible, proposals contribute to

improvements to health and quality of life through the effective management and

the Scheme complies with the aims and requirements of ENMitigation measures to minimise and manage potential noise and vibration effects throughout all project phases have also been fully detailed within the ES. The ES has demonstrated that the Scheme will not result in any significant noise and vibration

1 states that ‘the construction, operation and decommissioning of energy infrastructure may have socio-economic impacts at local and regional levels’. Local planning policy within Policy E1: Local economy seeks to sustain the local economy by supporting the location, diversity and intensity of new economic development.

sures include the implementation of a CEMP alongside the use of best available techniques to minimise potential noise and vibration effects during construction. Where reasonable and practicable, the use of quieter plant and equipment

bject to these mitigation measures, the Scheme during the construction phase is anticipated to result in negligible noise and vibration effects at all

lub is anticipated to experience lub negligible impacts during construction.

Whilst adverse effects resulting in an increase in ambient noise levels are predicted for nd temporary due to

the nature of the construction works and the transient use of the canal by receptors.

All noise impacts from temporary construction traffic will be negligible. On this basis no significant. Effects during

decommissioning are expected to be consistent with the predicted construction impacts.

Subject to the identified mitigation measures, operational noise effects would be perational noise levels would be within

World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines to avoid or minimise annoyance.

development of the MBP are predicted to be no more than minor, resulting in no

1 states that development consent will not be granted unless significant adverse noise impacts on health and quality of life are avoided and other

advises also that the must be satisfied that, where possible, proposals contribute to

improvements to health and quality of life through the effective management and

the Scheme complies with the aims and requirements of EN-1 and EN-2. Mitigation measures to minimise and manage potential noise and vibration effects throughout all project phases have also been fully detailed within the ES. The ES has demonstrated that the Scheme will not result in any significant noise and vibration

‘the construction, operation and decommissioning of economic impacts at local and regional levels’.

seeks to sustain the local economy by supporting the location, diversity and intensity of new economic development.

4.132 Chapter 6 of the ES provides an assessment of the socio

Scheme. The assessment considerincluding the creation of jobs, effects on tourism and community infrastructure and cumulative effects.

4.133 The ES assessment has not identified any potential for significant adverse socio

economic effects arising from the Scheme. In accordance with parameasures are proposed to enhance the socioinclude a Requirement in the Order to encourage contractors to use local suppliers and to train and recruit construction skilled

4.134 The residual socio-economic effects of the Scheme as summarised below:

Employment 4.135 Overall beneficial effect

phase would lead to the creation of 495 jobs during the peak period of construction activity, or 220 jobs averaged over a 36 month construction periodleast approximately 29and indirect jobs. The operational phase decommissioning phase is anti

Economic 4.136 The construction phase

£230m, approximately within the UK. The construction phase is anticipated to result in approximately £direct gross value added (GVA)£3m GVA and an employment income of £1.9m in the subThe operational phase is anticipated to result in approximately £1.annually and between £0.chain.

4.137 From an economic perspective

Scheme will have in stimulating the development of the forward the SCC Highway Worksthat the MBP will provide The Scheme will potentiallyfor heat supply.

Local disruption 4.138 All socio-economic effects

construction of the Schemelocal disruption such as noise, transport and air quality have been ass


of the ES provides an assessment of the socio-economic effects relating to the Scheme. The assessment considers a range of effects highlighted in paraincluding the creation of jobs, effects on tourism and community infrastructure and

has not identified any potential for significant adverse sociomic effects arising from the Scheme. In accordance with para

measures are proposed to enhance the socio-economic benefits of the Scheme. include a Requirement in the Order to encourage contractors to use local suppliers and

nd recruit construction skilled-staff locally. economic effects of the Scheme as identified in

Overall beneficial effects are predicted for all phases of the Scheme. The consto the creation of 495 jobs during the peak period of construction

jobs averaged over a 36 month construction period9 FTE jobs locally, 67 FTE sub-regionally and 99

and indirect jobs. The operational phase would create 30 FTE permanent jobs. The decommissioning phase is anticipated to generate approximately 50 FTE jobs.

The construction phase of the Scheme is anticipated to result in an investment of y half of which (an estimated £117.3m) could

The construction phase is anticipated to result in approximately £direct gross value added (GVA). The indirect employment benefit is expected to generate £3m GVA and an employment income of £1.9m in the sub-region during construction. The operational phase is anticipated to result in approximately £1.

and between £0.6m and £2.2m of indirect GVA annually through the supply

From an economic perspective, it is important to acknowledge the catalytic role the have in stimulating the development of the MBP Site

forward the SCC Highway Works. In the socio-economic chapter of the ESthat the MBP will provide a net 1,957 jobs and an annual GVA of £64.4m at 2012 prices.

potentially offer incoming businesses with modern accommodation

effects associated with potential disturbance caused during of the Scheme have been assessed as negligible. Issues that can influence

local disruption such as noise, transport and air quality have been ass


61

economic effects relating to the s a range of effects highlighted in para. 5.12.3 of EN-1,

including the creation of jobs, effects on tourism and community infrastructure and

has not identified any potential for significant adverse socio-mic effects arising from the Scheme. In accordance with para. 5.12.9 of EN-1

economic benefits of the Scheme. These include a Requirement in the Order to encourage contractors to use local suppliers and

identified in ES Chapter 6 are

are predicted for all phases of the Scheme. The construction to the creation of 495 jobs during the peak period of construction

jobs averaged over a 36 month construction period. This equates to at 99 FTE regionally direct

0 FTE permanent jobs. The pated to generate approximately 50 FTE jobs.

sult in an investment of at least could be procured from

The construction phase is anticipated to result in approximately £3.19m of ment benefit is expected to generate

region during construction. The operational phase is anticipated to result in approximately £1.45m of direct GVA

annually through the supply

it is important to acknowledge the catalytic role the Site, as well as bringing

economic chapter of the ES, it is estimated t 1,957 jobs and an annual GVA of £64.4m at 2012 prices.

offer incoming businesses with modern accommodation with

associated with potential disturbance caused during have been assessed as negligible. Issues that can influence

local disruption such as noise, transport and air quality have been assessed within the ES,


62

with the conclusions of these assessments informing the overall socioconclusion of negligible impact. economic activity during the operational phase of the

Tourism 4.139 All identified potential effects

effects during construction and operation on local visitor amenities including Golf Course, Downs Banks

Community infrastructure 4.140 All effects of the Scheme

negligible. 4.141 It is concluded that the Scheme would result in significant net socio

On this basis the Scheme local planning policy in terms of socio

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT (NPS EN 4.142 Section 5.13 of EN-1 identifies a number of traffic and transport effects that can arise

from infrastructure developments. Examples include increased congestion and disturbances caused by traffic and abnormal loads. Local promotes sustainable transport through best use of traffic and demand management schemes.

4.143 Chapter 7 of the ES assesses

during its construction, operation and decommissioning phases. 4.144 Para. 5.13.3 of EN-1 advises that applicants ‘

Highways Authorities as appropriate on the assessment and mitigation’. ES summarises the consultation that was conducted and how this informed the assessment. Further details of the consultation are contained in the Consultation Report (document reference 5.1).

4.145 All construction traffic delivering materials to the

routed from the south via the A34/Meaford Road junction. Aleaving the MEC Site to travel north on the A34 would be required to turn left out of Meaford Road and travel south along the roundabout junction. These requirements would be secured via a ConstructManagement Plan (CTMP). A

4.146 Additional mitigation measures to be included in the CTMP include use of a wheel wash

notification of abnormal loads to the relevant authorities and a HGV

PLANNING STATEMENT

with the conclusions of these assessments informing the overall socioconclusion of negligible impact. There is no potential for disruption to local socioeconomic activity during the operational phase of the Scheme.

effects on tourism have been assessed as negligible. effects during construction and operation on local visitor amenities including

ourse, Downs Banks, the Trent and Mersey Canal and the Barlaston B

Scheme on local community infrastructure have been assessed as

the Scheme would result in significant net socio-is the Scheme would comply with both relevant national planning policy and

local planning policy in terms of socio-economic effects.

EN-1, 5.13)

1 identifies a number of traffic and transport effects that can arise from infrastructure developments. Examples include increased congestion and disturbances caused by traffic and abnormal loads. Local Plan Policy T1:

sustainable transport through best use of traffic and demand management

assesses the transport and traffic effects arising from the Scheme during its construction, operation and decommissioning phases.

1 advises that applicants ‘should consult the Highways Agency and Highways Authorities as appropriate on the assessment and mitigation’. ES summarises the consultation that was conducted and how this informed the

Further details of the consultation are contained in the Consultation Report ).

All construction traffic delivering materials to the MEC Site, including HGVs, would be routed from the south via the A34/Meaford Road junction. Any construction traffic

Site to travel north on the A34 would be required to turn left out of travel south along the A34 towards the

roundabout junction. These requirements would be secured via a ConstructManagement Plan (CTMP). A draft CTMP is provided in the ES (Appendix 17.1

Additional mitigation measures to be included in the CTMP include use of a wheel washnotification of abnormal loads to the relevant authorities and a HGV

with the conclusions of these assessments informing the overall socio-economic There is no potential for disruption to local socio-

have been assessed as negligible. This includes effects during construction and operation on local visitor amenities including Barlaston

aston Bowls Club.

on local community infrastructure have been assessed as

-economic benefits. comply with both relevant national planning policy and

1 identifies a number of traffic and transport effects that can arise from infrastructure developments. Examples include increased congestion and

Policy T1: Transport sustainable transport through best use of traffic and demand management

the transport and traffic effects arising from the Scheme

should consult the Highways Agency and Highways Authorities as appropriate on the assessment and mitigation’. Chapter 7 of the ES summarises the consultation that was conducted and how this informed the

Further details of the consultation are contained in the Consultation Report

Site, including HGVs, would be ny construction traffic

Site to travel north on the A34 would be required to turn left out of towards the Whitebridge Lane

roundabout junction. These requirements would be secured via a Construction Traffic Appendix 17.11).

Additional mitigation measures to be included in the CTMP include use of a wheel wash, notification of abnormal loads to the relevant authorities and a HGV

booking/management system to ensure an orderly flow of construction traffic. These latter measures will ensure that arrivals and departures are spread across the course of a working day.

4.147 All transport and highways effects associated with the construc

be temporary in nature, with potential adverse impacts confined to Meaford Road. During peak construction activity, the ES assessment has predicted slight adverse effects on Meaford Road. All transport and highways effects during tbeen assessed as neutral. In addition all cumulative effects have been assessed to be no worse than the existing transport and traffic baseline.

4.148 The overall conclusions of the transport and traffic assessment contained wi

are that the Scheme would result in no significant adverse effects. considered that the Schemehighways.

WASTE MANAGEMENT (EN-1, 5.14 4.149 Section 5.14 of EN-1 deals with waste management, stating that government policy is

intended to protect human health and the environment by producing less waste and by using it as a resource where possible. ENmanagement is implemented throu

4.150 Para. 5.14.4 of EN-1 recognises that ‘

generate hazardous and nonassessment of waste material generated by the Scheme and itsenvironment throughout its construction, operation and decommissioning ES identifies how this waste can be managed in accordance with the guidance contained in EN-1.

4.151 In accordance with EN

relating to the Scheme and its effects on the environment. Where appropriate, mitigation measures relating to waste management have been identified.

4.152 The Scheme has been sited away from areas where its construction could

disturb known deposits of waste material. Furthermoreimplementation of a Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) incorporating measures for the re-use of uncontaminated materials across the materials on the MEC Smaterials will be treated on site where possible or otherwise removed off site.

4.153 All waste materials removed from the

hazardous waste would be removed by an appropriately licensed contractor and sent to recycling/treatment facilities as appropriate. In accordance with paraChapter 15 of the ES identifies the capacity


king/management system to ensure an orderly flow of construction traffic. These latter measures will ensure that arrivals and departures are spread across the course of a

All transport and highways effects associated with the construction of the Scheme would be temporary in nature, with potential adverse impacts confined to Meaford Road. During peak construction activity, the ES assessment has predicted slight adverse effects on Meaford Road. All transport and highways effects during the operational phase have been assessed as neutral. In addition all cumulative effects have been assessed to be no worse than the existing transport and traffic baseline.

The overall conclusions of the transport and traffic assessment contained wiare that the Scheme would result in no significant adverse effects.

Scheme fulfils NPS requirements with respect to

1, 5.14)

deals with waste management, stating that government policy is intended to protect human health and the environment by producing less waste and by using it as a resource where possible. EN-1 identifies that sustainable waste

ent is implemented through the waste hierarchy.

1 recognises that ‘all large infrastructure projects are likely to generate hazardous and non-hazardous waste’. Chapter 15 of the ES provides an assessment of waste material generated by the Scheme and itsenvironment throughout its construction, operation and decommissioning

identifies how this waste can be managed in accordance with the guidance contained

In accordance with EN-1, the ES incorporates a full assessment of waste management relating to the Scheme and its effects on the environment. Where appropriate, mitigation measures relating to waste management have been identified.

has been sited away from areas where its construction coulddisturb known deposits of waste material. Furthermore, mitigation measures include the implementation of a Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) incorporating measures for

use of uncontaminated materials across the MBP Site as well as the MEC Site to increase the amount available for recycling. Any hazardous

materials will be treated on site where possible or otherwise removed off site.

All waste materials removed from the MEC Site relating to both hazardous and waste would be removed by an appropriately licensed contractor and sent to

recycling/treatment facilities as appropriate. In accordance with paraChapter 15 of the ES identifies the capacity of existing waste management facilities


63

king/management system to ensure an orderly flow of construction traffic. These latter measures will ensure that arrivals and departures are spread across the course of a

tion of the Scheme would be temporary in nature, with potential adverse impacts confined to Meaford Road. During peak construction activity, the ES assessment has predicted slight adverse effects

he operational phase have been assessed as neutral. In addition all cumulative effects have been assessed to be no

The overall conclusions of the transport and traffic assessment contained within the ES are that the Scheme would result in no significant adverse effects. On this basis it is

fulfils NPS requirements with respect to transport and

deals with waste management, stating that government policy is intended to protect human health and the environment by producing less waste and by

1 identifies that sustainable waste

all large infrastructure projects are likely to Chapter 15 of the ES provides an

assessment of waste material generated by the Scheme and its effects on the environment throughout its construction, operation and decommissioning phases. The

identifies how this waste can be managed in accordance with the guidance contained

sessment of waste management relating to the Scheme and its effects on the environment. Where appropriate, mitigation measures relating to waste management have been identified.

has been sited away from areas where its construction could potentially mitigation measures include the

implementation of a Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) incorporating measures for as well as the segregation of

ite to increase the amount available for recycling. Any hazardous materials will be treated on site where possible or otherwise removed off site.

ite relating to both hazardous and non-waste would be removed by an appropriately licensed contractor and sent to

recycling/treatment facilities as appropriate. In accordance with para. 5.14.7 of EN-1, of existing waste management facilities


64

within the Staffordshire area and their ability to deal with the predicted waste generated by the Scheme.

4.154 Subject to the identified mitigation measures, the Scheme would result in a small

amount of residual waste requiring disposal. Both the construction and operational phases of the Scheme are management operations. Decommissioning effects define, because waste manageOn this basis, a further assessment would be undertaken prior to decommissioning. All potential cumulative waste effects have been assessed as not significant.

4.155 The overall conclusion of the ass

significant. Therefore, the Scheme is considered to fully comply with the guidance contained in Section 5.14 of EN

WATER QUALITY AND RESOURCES ( 4.156 Para. 5.15.1 of EN-1 states that ‘

the water environment, including groundwater, inland surface water, transitional waters and coastal waters’. Section 2.22 of ENpotentially affect watercourses, aquifers, water abstraction and discharge points. Section 5.15 of EN-1 advises that, where effects on the water environment are likely, an assessment of the existing status of, and impacts owater resources and physical characteristics of the water environment should be undertaken.

4.157 Consistent with these requirements

of the Scheme on the water environment. Effects have beconstruction, operation and decommissioning Section 5.15 of EN-1. Consistent with the advice contained within parathe ES assessment complies with the requirements of the Wat(WFD). In addition, account has also been taken of the Humber River Basin Management Plan (HBMP) which is the relevant

4.158 Whilst all potential effects on the water environment have bee

insignificant, a number of mitigation measures have been proposed. These measures include use of spill kits, bunding of potential contaminant sources and implementation of a drainage strategy. The mitigation measures will be implemented as papractice and in accordance with the CEMP.

4.159 Subject to the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, all effects

associated with the Scheme have been assessed as insignificant. In addition, the WFD assessment screening conductenot:

PLANNING STATEMENT

within the Staffordshire area and their ability to deal with the predicted waste generated

Subject to the identified mitigation measures, the Scheme would result in a small waste requiring disposal. Both the construction and operational

phases of the Scheme are anticipated to result in neutral effects on local waste management operations. Decommissioning effects in relation to waste define, because waste management methods and technologies are expected to evolve

a further assessment would be undertaken prior to decommissioning. All potential cumulative waste effects have been assessed as not significant.

The overall conclusion of the assessment is that all waste effects would not be the Scheme is considered to fully comply with the guidance

5.14 of EN-1.

WATER QUALITY AND RESOURCES (NPS EN-1, 5.15, NPS EN-2, 2.10 AND NPS EN

states that ‘infrastructure development can have adverse effects on the water environment, including groundwater, inland surface water, transitional waters

Section 2.22 of EN-4 advises that the construction of pipepotentially affect watercourses, aquifers, water abstraction and discharge points.

1 advises that, where effects on the water environment are likely, an assessment of the existing status of, and impacts of a development onwater resources and physical characteristics of the water environment should be

Consistent with these requirements, Chapter 14 of the ES has assessed the likely effects of the Scheme on the water environment. Effects have been considered during the construction, operation and decommissioning phases of the Scheme in accordance with

1. Consistent with the advice contained within parathe ES assessment complies with the requirements of the Water Framework Directive

account has also been taken of the Humber River Basin Management Plan (HBMP) which is the relevant river basin management plan for the

Whilst all potential effects on the water environment have beea number of mitigation measures have been proposed. These measures

include use of spill kits, bunding of potential contaminant sources and implementation of a drainage strategy. The mitigation measures will be implemented as papractice and in accordance with the CEMP.

Subject to the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, all effects associated with the Scheme have been assessed as insignificant. In addition, the WFD assessment screening conducted as part of the ES demonstrates that the Scheme would

within the Staffordshire area and their ability to deal with the predicted waste generated

Subject to the identified mitigation measures, the Scheme would result in a small waste requiring disposal. Both the construction and operational

to result in neutral effects on local waste in relation to waste are harder to

expected to evolve. a further assessment would be undertaken prior to decommissioning. All

potential cumulative waste effects have been assessed as not significant.

essment is that all waste effects would not be the Scheme is considered to fully comply with the guidance

AND NPS EN-4, 2.22)

infrastructure development can have adverse effects on the water environment, including groundwater, inland surface water, transitional waters

4 advises that the construction of pipelines can potentially affect watercourses, aquifers, water abstraction and discharge points.

1 advises that, where effects on the water environment are likely, an a development on water quality,

water resources and physical characteristics of the water environment should be

Chapter 14 of the ES has assessed the likely effects en considered during the

of the Scheme in accordance with 1. Consistent with the advice contained within para. 5.15.6 of EN-1,

er Framework Directive account has also been taken of the Humber River Basin Management

for the Scheme.

Whilst all potential effects on the water environment have been assessed as a number of mitigation measures have been proposed. These measures

include use of spill kits, bunding of potential contaminant sources and implementation of a drainage strategy. The mitigation measures will be implemented as part of best

Subject to the implementation of the identified mitigation measures, all effects associated with the Scheme have been assessed as insignificant. In addition, the WFD

d as part of the ES demonstrates that the Scheme would

• cause deterioration in the status of the ecological/chemical elements of the water body;

• introduce impediments to the attainment of Good WFD status for the water body;

• compromise the ability of

• cause a permanent exclusion or compromise achieving the WFD objectives in other bodies of water in the same River Basin District.

4.160 The overall conclusions of the ES demonstrate that the Scheme is in corequirements of relevant planning policy in respect of water quality and resources.


cause deterioration in the status of the ecological/chemical elements of the water

introduce impediments to the attainment of Good WFD status for the water body;

compromise the ability of the water body to meet its WFD objectives; or

cause a permanent exclusion or compromise achieving the WFD objectives in other bodies of water in the same River Basin District.

The overall conclusions of the ES demonstrate that the Scheme is in corequirements of relevant planning policy in respect of water quality and resources.


65

cause deterioration in the status of the ecological/chemical elements of the water

introduce impediments to the attainment of Good WFD status for the water body;

y to meet its WFD objectives; or

cause a permanent exclusion or compromise achieving the WFD objectives in other

The overall conclusions of the ES demonstrate that the Scheme is in compliance with the requirements of relevant planning policy in respect of water quality and resources.


66

PLANNING STATEMENT

POLICY COMPLIANCE 5.1 This Planning Statement has considered the

Policy Statements on Energy and other national and local policy, including Stafford Borough. To determine the extent to which policy, reference has been made to Design and Access Statement and the

5.2 From this assessment, the following overall conclusions are drawn

i). The national need for new gasnational policy, (EN-1), the National Policy Statement for FossilInfrastructure (ENand Gas and Oil Pipelines (ENNational Infrastructure Plan 2014. Statement, proposals such as the infrastructure, enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the transition to a low carbon economy.

ii). The Scheme is consistent with

Framework concerningemployment, the use of brownfield land and environmental protection.terms it is considered to be a sustainable development.

iii). The Scheme would actively support the implementation o

Stafford Borough of brownfield landspecifically, as provided for in Plan policies concerning the natural environment and green infrastructure, nature conservation, landscape, the historic environment and the provision of infrastructure to support new commercial development

iv). Chapter 4 of this Planning Statement

presented in the ES to appraise the and guidance provided in relevant National Policy Statements. With the environmental mitigation inhefor in Requirementslow impact proposal.


Five

This Planning Statement has considered the Scheme in the context of relevant National Policy Statements on Energy and other national and local policy, including

To determine the extent to which the Scheme complies with relevant policy, reference has been made to other Application documents including the ES, the Design and Access Statement and the Order.

From this assessment, the following overall conclusions are drawn:

The national need for new gas-fired power generation is acknowledged explicitly in national policy, including the Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy

National Policy Statement for Fossil-Fuel Electricity Generation EN-2), the National Policy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructure

and Gas and Oil Pipelines (EN-4), the Gas Generation Strategy National Infrastructure Plan 2014. As explained in Chapter

roposals such as the MEC will help to replace aged power generation infrastructure, enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the transition to a low carbon economy.

is consistent with relevant provisions of the National Planning Policy ork concerning sustainable development, economic

the use of brownfield land and environmental protection.terms it is considered to be a sustainable development.

would actively support the implementation of policies in Stafford Borough (adopted 2014) concerning the economy, employmentof brownfield land and the regeneration of the Former Meaford Power Station site

, as provided for in Local Plan policy E5. It is also consistent with lan policies concerning the natural environment and green infrastructure, nature

conservation, landscape, the historic environment and the provision of infrastructure to support new commercial development.

of this Planning Statement summarises the environmental information presented in the ES to appraise the Scheme in the light of the topicand guidance provided in relevant National Policy Statements. With the environmental mitigation inherent to the Scheme design, or otherw

equirements in Schedule 2 of the Order, it is concluded that the low impact proposal. This reflects the nature of the MBP


67

Five u Conclusions

in the context of relevant National Policy Statements on Energy and other national and local policy, including The Plan for

complies with relevant documents including the ES, the

:

fired power generation is acknowledged explicitly in including the Overarching National Policy Statement for Energy

Fuel Electricity Generation icy Statement for Gas Supply Infrastructure

ation Strategy 2012 and the hapter 2 of this Planning

will help to replace aged power generation infrastructure, enhance national security of electricity supply and assist in the

relevant provisions of the National Planning Policy sustainable development, economic growth and

the use of brownfield land and environmental protection. In these

policies in The Plan for concerning the economy, employment, the use

ormer Meaford Power Station site It is also consistent with Local

lan policies concerning the natural environment and green infrastructure, nature conservation, landscape, the historic environment and the provision of

the environmental information in the light of the topic-specific policy

and guidance provided in relevant National Policy Statements. With the or otherwise provided

, it is concluded that the Scheme is a within which the MEC


68

Site will be locatedgenerally low environmental and amenity value

v). With the Power Station

which itself is in a relativesettlements, sensitive receptors are generally terrain and vegetation will help to contain views of the

vi). The ability to secure the required

Connection without substantiates the low impact the AGI and the Power Station Commajority of this (approx

CONSULTATION FEEDBACK AND SAFEGUARDS 5.3 These conclusions are reinforced by the feedback received from consultees and

stakeholders, as recorded in the Consultation Report (docconsultees have identified a need for environmental mitigation or operational safeguards not already inherent in the in Schedule 2 of the Order

• Submission of design details to the • Landscaping scheme• Construction and Environment Management Plan• Ground investigation• Piling strategy • Fencing scheme • Habitat Management Plan• Construction Traffic Management Plan• Operational Travel Plan• Limitations on construction hours• Surface water drainage scheme• Lighting scheme • Emergency access • Bridge plinths • Highway works

5.4 A particular focus of the Requirements

the MEC site and constructionneighbourly manner.

PLANNING STATEMENT

located - a large expanse of previously used brownfield generally low environmental and amenity value, with no public right of access

tation Complex to be located in the central area of the which itself is in a relatively self-contained location in relation to surrounding settlements, sensitive receptors are generally remote from the terrain and vegetation will help to contain views of the Power Station

The ability to secure the required highway access, Gas Connectiwithout the need for extensive new infrastructure

low impact nature of the Scheme. The Gas Connection between Power Station Complex is approximately 760 metres

of this (approximately 620 metres) would be underground.

CONSULTATION FEEDBACK AND SAFEGUARDS

reinforced by the feedback received from consultees andstakeholders, as recorded in the Consultation Report (document referenceconsultees have identified a need for environmental mitigation or operational safeguards not already inherent in the Scheme design, MEL has includedin Schedule 2 of the Order. These include:

Submission of design details to the Relevant Planning Authority for approvalscheme

Construction and Environment Management Plan Ground investigation

Habitat Management Plan Construction Traffic Management Plan Operational Travel Plan

construction hours Surface water drainage scheme

A particular focus of the Requirements in the Order is to ensure that the preparation and construction of the Scheme take place in a well

brownfield land of with no public right of access.

in the central area of the MBP Site, elation to surrounding

from the Scheme. Local tation Complex.

Gas Connection and Electrical the need for extensive new infrastructure further

The Gas Connection between etres in length. The

) would be underground.

reinforced by the feedback received from consultees and ument reference 5.1). Where

consultees have identified a need for environmental mitigation or operational included Requirements

Relevant Planning Authority for approval

is to ensure that the preparation of take place in a well-ordered and

LIKELY BENEFITS AND DISBEN 5.5 Section 104 of the PA 2008

impacts of the Scheme

Likely Disbenefits 5.6 The potential for adverse impacts arising from a CCGT power station and its gas and

electricity connections is identified in general terms in National Policy Statementsand EN-2 which identify that fossil fuel generating stations to adverse effects in relation to air quality and emissions, biodiversity and geological conservation, flood risk, the historic environment, landscape and visual amenity, land use/land take, noise and vibration, sociowater quality and resources. These areexplains, some of these effects could occur in respect of the Scheme but the likely impacts have been minimised wherever possible and othappropriate siting, design and mitigation.

5.7 Nevertheless, once the inherent design measures and the further mitigation

the Requirements in the Order Scheme would have some residual adverse impact on air quality, noise, traffic and highways, cultural heritage and in terms of landscape and visual effects (day and night). From a socio-economic perspective the employment use.

5.8 Many of these adverse effects

phase of the Scheme, and will be a self-contained operatiovolume of road traffic.Unavoidably, the Power views over the immediate surrounding landscape, and moon the MBP Site itself.

5.9 In summary, whilst some disbenefits are likely, they are of a nature that are inherently

likely for fossil fuel generating stations, and as such are anticipated in policy, particularly in NPS EN-2. These effectsthroughout the pre-application process, including appropriate siting, design and Requirements to be mitigation. Benefits

5.10 Balanced against the disbenefits described above, there are important benefits

Scheme that must be taken into account


NEFITS OF THE SCHEME

PA 2008 requires the decision maker to consider whether the adverse Scheme would outweigh the benefits.

The potential for adverse impacts arising from a CCGT power station and its gas and electricity connections is identified in general terms in National Policy Statements

2 which identify that fossil fuel generating stations have the potential to give rise in relation to air quality and emissions, biodiversity and geological

conservation, flood risk, the historic environment, landscape and visual amenity, land use/land take, noise and vibration, socio-economics, traffic and transport, waste and water quality and resources. These are specifically addressed

, some of these effects could occur in respect of the Scheme but the likely impacts have been minimised wherever possible and other effects avoided through appropriate siting, design and mitigation.

nce the inherent design measures and the further mitigation in the Order are taken into account. It is acknowledged

would have some residual adverse impact on air quality, noise, traffic and highways, cultural heritage and in terms of landscape and visual effects (day and night).

economic perspective the Scheme would also occupy land allocated for

Many of these adverse effects would be experienced principally during the construction , and would be temporary in nature. Once operational

contained operation, acoustically contained and generat. There will also be emissions to air for the lifetime of the

ower Station Complex and notably the Stacks will be a feature in some the immediate surrounding landscape, and more especially from elsewhere

MBP Site itself.

In summary, whilst some disbenefits are likely, they are of a nature that are inherently likely for fossil fuel generating stations, and as such are anticipated in policy, particularly

These effects have been anticipated by MEL and application process, including during consultation. This has enabled

appropriate siting, design and Requirements to be included in the

Balanced against the disbenefits described above, there are important benefits taken into account appropriately.


69

consider whether the adverse

The potential for adverse impacts arising from a CCGT power station and its gas and electricity connections is identified in general terms in National Policy Statements EN-1

the potential to give rise in relation to air quality and emissions, biodiversity and geological

conservation, flood risk, the historic environment, landscape and visual amenity, land traffic and transport, waste and addressed in the ES. As the ES

, some of these effects could occur in respect of the Scheme but the likely er effects avoided through

nce the inherent design measures and the further mitigation proposed in acknowledged that the

would have some residual adverse impact on air quality, noise, traffic and highways, cultural heritage and in terms of landscape and visual effects (day and night).

also occupy land allocated for

be experienced principally during the construction be temporary in nature. Once operational, the Scheme

generating a relatively low for the lifetime of the Scheme.

will be a feature in some re especially from elsewhere

In summary, whilst some disbenefits are likely, they are of a nature that are inherently likely for fossil fuel generating stations, and as such are anticipated in policy, particularly

anticipated by MEL and have been assessed consultation. This has enabled

in the Order to provide

Balanced against the disbenefits described above, there are important benefits of the


70

5.11 The benefits of the Scheme Statements. Considerable weight must be given to the urgent need for energy generation, including gas fired generating stations as provide in NPS ENGenerating Strategy and The National Infrastructure Plan.

5.12 Fundamentally, the Scheme

electricity generation capacity. response to demand from the networkintermittent sources of renewable enenergy supply in the UK. The Scheme would also contribute materially to the immediate and medium term needs for flexible, reliable, peak load power generation.

5.13 In addition to the national public b

the remediation and regeneration ofScheme has been designed to maximise the developable land on the MBP for employment use and the resulting positive socScheme has the potential to provide heat supply to occupiers on the MBP and should help attract occupiers to the MBP. The design of the Scheme has minimised landscape and visual effects and various measures have beenof those in the area. On balanceproceeding is considered to be

5.14 The Scheme will be a £300 million

procured from within the UK. jobs during the peak period of construction activity, or 220 jobs averaged over a 36 month construction period

5.15 Gross Added Value (GVA) is a measure of the va

area, industry or sector of an economyapproximately £3.19m of direct GVAgenerate £3m GVA and an employment incconstruction. Once operational and is anticipated to result in approximately £1.45m of direct GVA annually and between £0.6m and £2.2m of indirect GVA annually

OVERALL CONCLUSIONS 5.16 Once the benefits and disbenefits are weighed in the planning balance, i

that there are no relevant adverse impacts or disbenefits sufficient to outweigh the likely benefits of the Scheme including the regeneration of the the local and regional economic benefits, and the considerable public benefit tthe national need for electricity generation. allowing the Scheme to proceed.

PLANNING STATEMENT

Scheme align with those anticipated by relevant National Policy Considerable weight must be given to the urgent need for energy

generation, including gas fired generating stations as provide in NPS ENGenerating Strategy and The National Infrastructure Plan.

Scheme will help to meet the urgent national need for new efficient electricity generation capacity. The Scheme would provide power flexibly and reliably in response to demand from the network and, in these terms they are complementary to intermittent sources of renewable energy and will support the transition to low carbon

The Scheme would also contribute materially to the immediate and medium term needs for flexible, reliable, peak load power generation.

In addition to the national public benefit, at the local level the Scheme the remediation and regeneration of a strategically significant brownfield siteScheme has been designed to maximise the developable land on the MBP for employment use and the resulting positive socio-economic benefits. In addition, the Scheme has the potential to provide heat supply to occupiers on the MBP and should help attract occupiers to the MBP. The design of the Scheme has minimised landscape and visual effects and various measures have been included to improve the experience

On balance, the local and regional economic interest in this proceeding is considered to be a benefit.

will be a £300 million investment, approximately half of which couldprocured from within the UK. The construction phase would lead to thejobs during the peak period of construction activity, or 220 jobs averaged over a 36 month construction period.

Gross Added Value (GVA) is a measure of the value of goods and services produced in an area, industry or sector of an economy. The construction phase is anticipated to result in

f direct GVA and the indirect employment benefit is expected to generate £3m GVA and an employment income of £1.9m in the sub

operational the Power Station Complex will provide c. 30 skilled jobs is anticipated to result in approximately £1.45m of direct GVA annually and between

£0.6m and £2.2m of indirect GVA annually through the supply chain.

Once the benefits and disbenefits are weighed in the planning balance, ithat there are no relevant adverse impacts or disbenefits sufficient to outweigh the likely benefits of the Scheme including the regeneration of the the local and regional economic benefits, and the considerable public benefit t

electricity generation. There would be clear public beneto proceed.

align with those anticipated by relevant National Policy Considerable weight must be given to the urgent need for energy

generation, including gas fired generating stations as provide in NPS EN-1, the Gas

meet the urgent national need for new efficient provide power flexibly and reliably in

n these terms they are complementary to ergy and will support the transition to low carbon

The Scheme would also contribute materially to the immediate and medium term needs for flexible, reliable, peak load power generation.

Scheme would support a strategically significant brownfield site. The

Scheme has been designed to maximise the developable land on the MBP for economic benefits. In addition, the

Scheme has the potential to provide heat supply to occupiers on the MBP and should help attract occupiers to the MBP. The design of the Scheme has minimised landscape

included to improve the experience the local and regional economic interest in this Scheme

approximately half of which could be The construction phase would lead to the creation of 495

jobs during the peak period of construction activity, or 220 jobs averaged over a 36

lue of goods and services produced in an . The construction phase is anticipated to result in

he indirect employment benefit is expected to ome of £1.9m in the sub-region during

will provide c. 30 skilled jobs is anticipated to result in approximately £1.45m of direct GVA annually and between

Once the benefits and disbenefits are weighed in the planning balance, it is concluded that there are no relevant adverse impacts or disbenefits sufficient to outweigh the likely benefits of the Scheme including the regeneration of the MBP Site, the local and regional economic benefits, and the considerable public benefit to meeting

here would be clear public benefit in

5.17 The Scheme meets explicit objectives development plan policy at the local level. There is clear national interest in securing new electricity generation capacity and in the deliver this. At the local level the inwfor heat supply are all considered to represent significant net benefits.environmental and amenity safeguards should ensure that adverse effects on local residents

5.18 MEL has maintained dialogue throughout the pre

planning authorities, the Environment Agency, Natural England and other consultees and regulators and will continue to do so at all relScheme.

5.19 The Scheme is in line with the relevant National Policy Statements, being NPS EN

EN-2, NPS EN-4 and NPS ENRegulations, alternatives, grid connection, safety, health, nuisance and security have been given due regard as demonstrated in the E(document reference Connection Statement (document reference 8.2)(document reference environmental effects and has proposed apbe secured through the Requirements in the Order (see Schedule 2 to the Order, document reference 3.1

5.20 In accordance with the considerations set out in

concluded that the identified benefits of the Scheme outweigh any adverse impactsthat there is a clear and compelling for the Scheme.


The Scheme meets explicit objectives of national energy and planning policy and development plan policy at the local level. There is clear national interest in securing new electricity generation capacity and in the large financial investment requiredeliver this. At the local level the inward investment, physical regeneration and potential for heat supply are all considered to represent significant net benefits.environmental and amenity safeguards should ensure that the Scheme minimises

on local residents during construction and operation.

MEL has maintained dialogue throughout the pre-application period with the relevant planning authorities, the Environment Agency, Natural England and other consultees and regulators and will continue to do so at all relevant stages prior to the operation of the

The Scheme is in line with the relevant National Policy Statements, being NPS EN4 and NPS EN-5. Considerations as to siting, Habitats and Species

Regulations, alternatives, good design, consideration of combined heat and power (CHP), grid connection, safety, health, nuisance and security have been given due regard as demonstrated in the ES (document reference 6.2), the Design and Access Statement(document reference 5.3), this Planning Statement (document reference Connection Statement (document reference 8.2) and the Grid Connection Statement (document reference 8.1). The ES has also assessed all relevant likely significant environmental effects and has proposed appropriate mitigation measuresbe secured through the Requirements in the Order (see Schedule 2 to the Order,

3.1).

In accordance with the considerations set out in Section 104 of the identified benefits of the Scheme outweigh any adverse impactsand compelling case in the public interest for


71

national energy and planning policy and development plan policy at the local level. There is clear national interest in securing

large financial investment required to , physical regeneration and potential

for heat supply are all considered to represent significant net benefits. The proposed the Scheme minimises

construction and operation.

application period with the relevant planning authorities, the Environment Agency, Natural England and other consultees and

evant stages prior to the operation of the

The Scheme is in line with the relevant National Policy Statements, being NPS EN-1, NPS 5. Considerations as to siting, Habitats and Species

, consideration of combined heat and power (CHP), grid connection, safety, health, nuisance and security have been given due regard as

the Design and Access Statement s Planning Statement (document reference 5.2), Gas

and the Grid Connection Statement all relevant likely significant

measures. This would be secured through the Requirements in the Order (see Schedule 2 to the Order,

104 of the PA 2008, it is identified benefits of the Scheme outweigh any adverse impacts, and

case in the public interest for the Order to be made


72

PLANNING STATEMENT

GLOSSARY

Full Text AcronymAbove Ground Installation

AGI

Above Ordnance Datum

AOD

Air Cooled Condenser

-

Air Quality Limit Value Regulations 2010

-

Air Quality Management Area

AQMA

Air Quality Management Plan

AQMP

Air Quality Modelling and Assessment Unit

AQMAU

Air Quality Strategy

AQS

Ancient Woodland - Annual Average Daily Traffic

AADT

Application -

Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure Regulations

APFP

Asbestos Containing Material

ACM

Automatic Traffic Count

ATC

Automatic Urban and Rural Network

AURN

Best Available Technique

BAT

Biodiversity Action Plan

BAP


Acronym Notes Compound where the Gas Connection connects to the Local Transmission System (work numbered 2A in Schedule 1 of the Order). Height of land surface above sea level.

A direct dry cooling system where the steam is condensed and returned condensate to the boiler without water loss. Situated within the Power Station Complex. UK regulations to limit the levels of air borne pollutants emitted from industries.

An area designated by a local authority as being at risk of not meeting air quality standards.

A plan developed to improve the air quality in the air quality management area.

AQMAU An Environment Agency team that targets air quality related issues.

The AQS for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland provides details of national air quality standards and objectives for a number of local air pollutants. A woodland that has existed continuously since 1600 or before.

Measurement unit for the total volume of vehicle traffic to indicate how busy the road is. The DCO application for the Scheme made to the Secretary of State under the PA 2008. The Infrastructure Planning Regulations 2009, as amended, which prescribe various matters in connection with the making of an application for development consent under the

Any material containing more than 1% asbestos.

Means of determining traffic levels in the vicinity.

Air quality monitoring site.

The most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicates the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing the basis for emission limit values and other permit conditions designed prevent and, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions and the impact on the environment as a whole. Plan concerned with the protection of identified species and habitats.


73

Compound where the Gas Connection connects to the Local Transmission System (work numbered 2A in Schedule 1 of the

A direct dry cooling system where the steam is condensed and returned condensate to the boiler without water loss. Situated

UK regulations to limit the levels of air borne pollutants emitted

An area designated by a local authority as being at risk of not

eveloped to improve the air quality in the air quality

An Environment Agency team that targets air quality related issues.

Northern Ireland provides details of national air quality standards and objectives for

A woodland that has existed continuously since 1600 or before. t for the total volume of vehicle traffic to indicate

The DCO application for the Scheme made to the Secretary of State

The Infrastructure Planning Regulations 2009, as amended, which prescribe various matters in connection with the making of an application for development consent under the PA 2008.

estos.

Means of determining traffic levels in the vicinity.

The most effective and advanced stage in the development of activities and their methods of operation which indicates the practical suitability of particular techniques for providing the basis for emission limit values and other permit conditions designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions and

Plan concerned with the protection of identified species and


74

Full Text Acronym British Geological Survey

BGS

BS 4142 -

BS 8233 -

BS5228 -

CAoL Guidance

-

Canal Bridge 101 or Canal Bridge No.101

-

Carbon Dioxide CO2

Carbon Monoxide CO

Chamber of Commerce

CoC

Civil Aviation Authority

CAA

Classified Turning Counts

CTC

Coal Authority -

Construction Industry Research and Information Association

CIRIA

Code of Construction Practices

CoCP

Combined Cycle Gas Turbine

CCGT

Combined Heat and Power

CHP

Commercial and Industrial waste

C&I

Common Bird Census

CBC

Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants

COMEAP

Conceptual Site Model

CSM

Conservation Areas CA

PLANNING STATEMENT

Notes The UK public body responsible for all aspects of geoscience.

Method for Rating Industrial Noise Affecting Mixed Residential and Industrial Areas (1997). Guidance on sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings (2014). Code of Practice for Noise and Vibration Control on Construction and Open Sites 2009 (2009). Department of Communities and Local Government guidance ‘2008: Guidance related to procedures for the compulsory acquisition of land’ (September 2013). The bridge known as Malkin's Bridge traversing the Trent and Mersey Canal at Grid Reference SJ 889 370.

A primary greenhouse gas emitted through human activities as well as natural sources. One of the combustion products discharged by CCGT power stations. A network of businesses to represent business interests.

A statutory corporation that oversees and regulates civil aviation in the UK. Measurement of vehicle traffic in particular at junctions.

A non-governmental body that manages coal mining operations and coal reserves throughout the UK. -

A guidance document that sets out standards and procedures for managing environmental impact of constructing major schemes.

A form of power station that uses an efficient combination of gas and steam turbines to generate electricity. A means of using waste heat generated by power station e.g. through a local heat distribution network. A type of waste from businesses that does not include construction and demolition waste. A standardised methodology to map breeding bird territories.

An advisory body that advises the UK government on all matters concerning the health effects of air pollutants.

A model that identifies the possible pathways by which a contaminant from a particular source can affect a particulareceptor. An area of special architectural and historic interest designated by

lic body responsible for all aspects of geoscience.

Method for Rating Industrial Noise Affecting Mixed Residential and

Guidance on sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings

Practice for Noise and Vibration Control on Construction

Department of Communities and Local Government guidance ‘PA : Guidance related to procedures for the compulsory

The bridge known as Malkin's Bridge traversing the Trent and

A primary greenhouse gas emitted through human activities as well

One of the combustion products discharged by CCGT power

A network of businesses to represent business interests.

A statutory corporation that oversees and regulates civil aviation in

Measurement of vehicle traffic in particular at junctions.

governmental body that manages coal mining operations and

A guidance document that sets out standards and procedures for managing environmental impact of constructing major schemes.

A form of power station that uses an efficient combination of gas

A means of using waste heat generated by power station e.g.

A type of waste from businesses that does not include construction

A standardised methodology to map breeding bird territories.

An advisory body that advises the UK government on all matters

A model that identifies the possible pathways by which a contaminant from a particular source can affect a particular

An area of special architectural and historic interest designated by

Full Text Acronym

Construction Stage -

Construction and Demolition Waste

C&D

Construction Environmental Management Plan

CEMP

Construction Traffic Management Plan

CTMP

Construction Travel Plan

CTP

dB(A) -

Decibel dB Decommissioning Stage

-

Department for Energy and Climate Change

DECC

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

DEFRA

Department for Transport

DfT

Deposition -

Design Manual for Roads and Bridges

DMRB

Determinand -

Development Consent Order

DCO


Acronym Notes the local planning authority. The construction stage of the Scheme begins with enabling works, which will include site set-up and groundworks and will take in the region of 3-6 months. Following this, construction of the Power Station Complex, Gas Connection and Electrical Connection will be undertaken over a period of approximately 18 months, with commissioning taking in the region of six months.A type of construction waste as identified by the Environment Agency.

A plan by the contractor describing how the environmental impacts of construction activities of a project will be minimised and mitigated.

A plan by the construction contractor for managing construction traffic that is submitted to the relevant Highway Authority for approval A plan by the construction contractor for managing staff travel during the construction stage of a project (e.g. car sharing, public transport) that is submitted to the relevant Highway Authority for approval. A-weighted decibel – a correction applied to each frequency between 20 Hz and 20 kHz that effectively represents the way the human ear works. Logarithmic scale for measuring sound levels.After a notional lifetime of 35 years, the plant for the Scheme would be decommissioned and the MEC Site will revert to open bare ground. The Electrical Connection is likely to be dismantled along with the Power Station Complex. The existing gas pipes are likely to be left in-situ in order to avoid the adverse environmental effects associated with their removal, with the gas supply diverted.

Government department responsible for energ

The UK Government department responsible for environmental protection, food production and standards, agriculture, fisheries and rural communities in the UK. Government department responsible for transport.

The main pathway for removing pollutants from the atmosphere, by settling on land.

A suite of technical documents produced by the Highways Agency that include guidance for environmental appraisal that are also used for non-highways schemes and as such are commonly used in EIA. A substance or parameter that is determined analytically, e.g. arsenic concentration in soil, pH of water, conparticular gas in air quality modelling. An order made under the PA 2008 granting development consent for a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project


75

The construction stage of the Scheme begins with enabling works, groundworks and will take in the

6 months. Following this, construction of the Power Station Complex, Gas Connection and Electrical Connection will be undertaken over a period of approximately 18 months, with

of six months. A type of construction waste as identified by the Environment

A plan by the contractor describing how the environmental impacts of construction activities of a project will be minimised and

A plan by the construction contractor for managing construction hat is submitted to the relevant Highway Authority for

A plan by the construction contractor for managing staff travel during the construction stage of a project (e.g. car sharing, public

to the relevant Highway Authority for

a correction applied to each frequency between 20 Hz and 20 kHz that effectively represents the way the

Logarithmic scale for measuring sound levels. After a notional lifetime of 35 years, the plant for the Scheme would be decommissioned and the MEC Site will revert to open bare ground. The Electrical Connection is likely to be dismantled

The existing gas pipes are situ in order to avoid the adverse environmental

effects associated with their removal, with the gas supply diverted. Government department responsible for energy policy.

The UK Government department responsible for environmental protection, food production and standards, agriculture, fisheries

Government department responsible for transport.

The main pathway for removing pollutants from the atmosphere, by

A suite of technical documents produced by the Highways Agency hat include guidance for environmental appraisal that are also

highways schemes and as such are commonly used in

A substance or parameter that is determined analytically, e.g. arsenic concentration in soil, pH of water, concentration of a

granting development consent for a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project


76

Full Text Acronym Electrical Connection

-

Electricity Market Reform

EMR

Electric and Magnetic Fields

EMF

Emission -

Emission Limit Value

ELV

Energy Efficiency Directive 2012

-

English Heritage EH

English Heritage Archives

EHA

Environment Agency

EA

Environmental Health Officer

EHO

Environmental Impact Assessment

EIA

Environmental Permit

EP

Environmental Permitting Regulations

EPR

Environmental Protection Act 1990

EPA

Environmental Quality Standards

EQS

Environmental Statement

ES

Environmentally Sensitive Area

ESA

Flood Defence Consent

FDC

PLANNING STATEMENT

Notes The integral underground cable circuit connecting the Power Station Complex to the existing Barlaston Substation (numbered work 3 in Schedule 1 to the Order and as shown on the Works Plans). UK government's policy to reform the electricity market. The policy aims to deliver a low carbon energy and reliable supplies for the UK, while minimise costs to consumers. EMF’s comprise electric and magnetic fields. Electric fields are the result of voltages applied to electrical conductors and equipment. Magnetic fields are produced by the flow of electric current. The direct or indirect release of substances, vibrations, heat or noise from individual or diffuse sources into air, water or onto land, e.g. pollution may be discharged into the atmosphere from a stack or vent. Legal enforcement limit on the physical, chemical or biological characteristics of a point source of emission to water or air.The Directive establishes a framework of measures for the promotion of energy efficiency within the European Union. The executive non-departmental public body that advises the public and other bodies on the care of the historic environment in England. A public archive of architectural and archaeological records.

The non-departmental government body responsible for protection and enhancement of the environment in England and Wales.A local authority health professional responsible for carrying out measures for protecting public health. The process of assessing the likely significant environmental impacts of a proposed project as part of gaining planning consent.A permit required in accordance with the Environmental Permitting Regulations. The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/675) as amended that regulates practices that have pollution potential through a permitting system. The Act that covers, amongst other things, the regulation of contaminated land in the UK.

The concentration of a particular pollutant or group of pollutants in water, sediment or biota which should not be exceeded in order to protect human health and the environment. The document which reports the process, findings recommendations of the EIA carried out to assess the environmental impacts of the Scheme informed by the Scoping Opinion. A designation for agricultural areas needing special protection by virtue of their landscape, wildlife or historical value.A consent required by the Environment Agency, for construction or maintenance work on over, under or near a main river (usually

cable circuit connecting the Power Station Complex to the existing Barlaston Substation (numbered work 3 in Schedule 1 to the Order and as shown on the Works

UK government's policy to reform the electricity market. The policy aims to deliver a low carbon energy and reliable supplies for the UK,

ectric fields are the result of voltages applied to electrical conductors and equipment. Magnetic fields are produced by the flow of electric current. The direct or indirect release of substances, vibrations, heat or

iffuse sources into air, water or onto land, e.g. pollution may be discharged into the atmosphere from a stack

Legal enforcement limit on the physical, chemical or biological to water or air.

The Directive establishes a framework of measures for the promotion of energy efficiency within the European Union.

departmental public body that advises the public and other bodies on the care of the historic environment in

A public archive of architectural and archaeological records.

departmental government body responsible for protection and enhancement of the environment in England and Wales. A local authority health professional responsible for carrying out

The process of assessing the likely significant environmental impacts of a proposed project as part of gaining planning consent. A permit required in accordance with the Environmental Permitting

The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2010 (SI 2010/675) as amended that regulates practices that have

on potential through a permitting system. The Act that covers, amongst other things, the regulation of

The concentration of a particular pollutant or group of pollutants in water, sediment or biota which should not be exceeded in order to

The document which reports the process, findings and recommendations of the EIA carried out to assess the environmental impacts of the Scheme informed by the Scoping

A designation for agricultural areas needing special protection by wildlife or historical value.

A consent required by the Environment Agency, for construction or maintenance work on over, under or near a main river (usually

Full Text Acronym

Flood Risk Assessment

FRA

Full Time Equivalents

FTE

Gas Connection -

Gas Turbine GT Great Crested Newt

GCN

Groundwater Source Protection Zone

GSPZ

Guidance for the Environmental Assessment of Road Traffic

GEART

Guidance on Transport Assessment

GTA

Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, 3rd Edition

GLVIA

Habitat Regulations Assessment

HRA

Habitat Suitability Index

HSI

Health and Safety Executive

HSE

Heat Recovery Steam Generator

HRSG

Heavy Goods Vehicle

HGV

Highway Authority HA

Highways Agency HA

Historic Environmental Record

HER

Home and HCA


Acronym Notes within 8-10 metres). An assessment that determines the risk of flooding to a proposed project. The equivalent number of full time jobs provided by a project two half-time jobs equates to one FTE.

The integral gas pipeline connecting the Power Station Complex to the Local Transmission System, including the Above Ground Installation, (numbered works 2A and 2B in Schedule 1 to the Order and as shown on the Works Plans). A turbine driven by hot combustion gases at high temperature.A species of newt protected by European Legislation.

Areas around groundwater abstraction sources that are defined in order to help protect drinking water from contamination.

The IEMA guidance on the environmental assessment of road traffic.

Department for Transport guidance dated March 2007 preparation of Transport Assessments as archived 22 October 2014 and replaced by NPPG “Transport evidence bases in plan making”

Guidance produced by the Landscape Institute Environmental Management and Assessment dated 17 April 2013

An assessment required under the European Directive 92/43/EEC.

A method for assessing the suitability of ponds for their potential to support Great Crested Newts. The non-departmental government body responsible for workplace safety in the UK.

A means of recovering heat energy from hot to produce steam for driving a turbine. A truck that when laden has a total weight of more than 3500 kg.

The relevant highway authority responsible for the nonnetwork (i.e. roads other than trunk roads and motorways), usually the county council in two-tier authority areas.The executive agency of the Department for Transport responsible for the core road network in England. The record held by the local planning authority of known archaeological sites, buildings and landscapes of relevance to the historic environment. The executive non-departmental public body responsible for


77

ermines the risk of flooding to a proposed

The equivalent number of full time jobs provided by a project - e.g.

The integral gas pipeline connecting the Power Station Complex to the Local Transmission System, including the Above Ground Installation, (numbered works 2A and 2B in Schedule 1 to the Order

ven by hot combustion gases at high temperature. A species of newt protected by European Legislation.

Areas around groundwater abstraction sources that are defined in drinking water from contamination.

The IEMA guidance on the environmental assessment of road

Department for Transport guidance dated March 2007 on the preparation of Transport Assessments as archived 22 October 2014 and replaced by NPPG “Transport evidence bases in plan making” Guidance produced by the Landscape Institute and the Institute for Environmental Management and Assessment dated 17 April 2013

An assessment required under the European Directive 92/43/EEC.

onds for their potential to

departmental government body responsible for workplace

A means of recovering heat energy from hot exhaust gases in order

A truck that when laden has a total weight of more than 3500 kg.

The relevant highway authority responsible for the non-core road ads other than trunk roads and motorways), usually

tier authority areas. The executive agency of the Department for Transport responsible

The record held by the local planning authority of known archaeological sites, buildings and landscapes of relevance to the

departmental public body responsible for


78

Full Text Acronym Communities Agency Hover - Indices of Multiple Deprivation

IMD

Industrial Emissions Directive

IED

Infrastructure Planning Commission

IPC

Institute of Acoustics

IOA

Institute of Air Quality Management

IAQM

Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment

IEMA

Institute of Gas Engineers and Managers

IGEM

Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive

IPPC

ISO 9613-2 -

Joint Nature Conservation Committee

JNCC

Kilovolt kV LA10 -

LA90 -

LAeq - LAmax -

Landscape Character Assessment

LCA

PLANNING STATEMENT

Notes housing and regeneration across England. Also the regulator of registered social housing providers. An otter’s day nest or resting site. An index to measure deprived areas in the wards of English local authorities. EU Directive on industrial emissions that came into force in January 2011. The public body that previously examined applications for development consent to build Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects, abolished through the Localism Act 2011 with the role replaced by PINS. Professional body for Acoustics, Noise and Vibration professionals.

IAQM is a professional body for air quality professionals.

IEMA is a professional body for environmental professionals that provides industry guidance on many topics including EIA.

IGEM is a chartered professional body, licensed by the Engineering Council.

The EU Directive (2008/1/EC) incorporated into UK law by the Environmental Permitting Regulations on prevention and control of industrial emissions. The Directive aims to achieve a high level protection of the environment through measures to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions to air, water and land from activities listed in Annex I of the Directive (e.g. energy industries, production and processing of metals, mineral industry, chemical industry, intensive pig and poultry farming, waste management, some food and drink industries etc.). Acoustics- Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors 2: General method of calculation. The public body that advises the UK government and devolved administrations on UK-wide and international nature conservation.

A measure of electrical potential. A-weighted noise level exceeded for 10% of the measurement period. A-weighted noise level exceeded for 90% of the measurement period. A-weighted equivalent continuous sound level. A-weighted maximum sound pressure level recorded over a given period. An assessment used to understand and articulate the character of a landscape, by identifying what give a locality it’s 'sense of place' and what makes it different from neighbouring areas carried out

housing and regeneration across England. Also the regulator of

An index to measure deprived areas in the wards of English local

EU Directive on industrial emissions that came into force in January

The public body that previously examined applications for lly Significant Infrastructure

Projects, abolished through the Localism Act 2011 with the role

Professional body for Acoustics, Noise and Vibration professionals.

IAQM is a professional body for air quality professionals.

IEMA is a professional body for environmental professionals that provides industry guidance on many topics including EIA.

IGEM is a chartered professional body, licensed by the Engineering

The EU Directive (2008/1/EC) incorporated into UK law by the gulations on prevention and control of

industrial emissions. The Directive aims to achieve a high level protection of the environment through measures to prevent or, where that is not practicable, to reduce emissions to air, water and

listed in Annex I of the Directive (e.g. energy industries, production and processing of metals, mineral industry, chemical industry, intensive pig and poultry farming, waste management, some food and drink industries etc.).

Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part

The public body that advises the UK government and devolved wide and international nature conservation.

weighted noise level exceeded for 10% of the measurement

weighted noise level exceeded for 90% of the measurement

weighted maximum sound pressure level recorded over a given

An assessment used to understand and articulate the character of a landscape, by identifying what give a locality it’s 'sense of place' and what makes it different from neighbouring areas carried out

Full Text Acronym

Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland

LCAG

Land Plan -

Large Combustion Plant Directive

LCPD

Laydown Areas -

Lead Local Flood Authority

LLFA

Light Duty Vehicles LDV Listed Building

Local Development Framework

LDF

Local Enterprise Partnership

LEP

Local Nature Reserve

LNR

Local Transmission System

LTS


Acronym Notes pursuant to the Landscape Character Assessment Guidance England and Scotland.

Guidance on Landscape Character Assessment issued by The Countryside Agency (now Natural England) and Scottish Natural Heritage dated 2002.

The plan showing the land required for the Scheme which is to be the subject of the power to acquire new rights, to extinguish or suspend existing rights and/or impose restrictive covenants submitted with the Application (Document Reference 2.2). European legislation to reduce acidification, ground level ozone and particles throughout Europe by controlling emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and from large combustion plants in power stations. The temporary (Work numbered 5A on the Works Plans) and temporary/permanent (Work numbered 5B on the Works Plans) laydown areas required for the Scheme. The Laydown Area shown on the Works Plan5A in Schedule 1 to the Order is the southern laydown area located in the southern part of the Order Limits and will be up to 0.6ha in size. It will be used during construction of the Scheme only. The Laydown Area shown on the Works Plan5B in Schedule 1 to the Order is the primary laydown area for the Scheme and will be up to 1.8ha in size and located immediately to the north of the Power Station Complex. It will be used during construction of the Scheme and for maintenance activities during operation. The authority responsible for developing, maintaining and applying a strategy for local flood risk management in their areas and maintaining a register of flood risk assets. Vehicles with a weight less than 3.5 tonnes (gross weight).A building that has been placed on the statutory list of buildings of Special Architectural or Historic Interest and protected by the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended). A spatial planning strategy introduced by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. A sub-regional body responsible for setting strategic direction and implementation of economic development. Statutory designation for places with wildlife or geological features that are of special interest locally. The Local Transmission System which transports gas from National Transmission System off-takes towards and between urban areas.


79

pursuant to the Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for

Guidance on Landscape Character Assessment issued by The Countryside Agency (now Natural England) and Scottish Natural

The plan showing the land required for the Scheme which is to be the subject of the power to acquire new rights, to extinguish or suspend existing rights and/or impose restrictive covenants submitted with the Application (Document Reference 2.2). European legislation to reduce acidification, ground level ozone and particles throughout Europe by controlling emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and from large combustion plants in power

The temporary (Work numbered 5A on the Works Plans) and temporary/permanent (Work numbered 5B on the Works Plans)

The Laydown Area shown on the Works Plans and numbered Work e southern laydown area located

in the southern part of the Order Limits and will be up to 0.6ha in size. It will be used during construction of the Scheme only.

The Laydown Area shown on the Works Plans and numbered Work s the primary laydown area for the

Scheme and will be up to 1.8ha in size and located immediately to the north of the Power Station Complex. It will be used during construction of the Scheme and for maintenance activities during

The authority responsible for developing, maintaining and applying a strategy for local flood risk management in their areas and

3.5 tonnes (gross weight). A building that has been placed on the statutory list of buildings of Special Architectural or Historic Interest and protected by the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as

A spatial planning strategy introduced by the Planning and

regional body responsible for setting strategic direction and

Statutory designation for places with wildlife or geological features

The Local Transmission System which transports gas from National takes towards and between urban areas.


80

Full Text Acronym

Local Transport Plan

LTP

Local Wildlife Site LWS Made Ground -

Maintenance -

Manual for Streets MfS

Meaford Business Park

MBP

MBP Site -

Meaford Energy Centre (also referred to as the "Scheme")

MEC

MEC Site (also referred to as the "Site")

-

Meaford Energy Limited

MEL

Megawatts of electrical power

MWe

Megawatts of thermal power

MWth

Milligrams per normal cubic metre

mg/ Nm3

Multi Agency Geographical Information for the Countryside

MAGIC

National Character Area

NCA

PLANNING STATEMENT

Notes In the area of the Scheme, the LTS is the PL1134 Barlaston to Sandon. A plan by a local Highway Authority that sets out a strategy for the future of transport in its area. The LTP for the administrative area of the Scheme is the Staffordshire Local Transport Plan 3, adopted by Staffordshire County Council in 2011. Wildlife rich sites selected for their local nature conservation value. Man-made deposits artificially placed comprising a wide variety of material e.g. concrete, brick etc - typical of previously developed sites. Maintenance can comprise inspections, repair, adjustments or alterations, removal, refurbishments, reconstruction, replacements and improvements. The guidance produced by the Department for Transport and Department for Communities and Local Government on road layout and balancing the needs of different road users, with a focus on residential roads, dated 29 March 2007. The business park with extant planning permission (and bearing planning references: 1998/35897/OUT and issued 1 May 2007, 2010/13609/EXT and 2014/21379/EXTO)) for 110,000 sqm of commercial, warehousing and business support activities on the MBP Site within which the majority of the Scheme will be constructed. The location of Meaford Business Park. The construction, operation, maintenance and eventual decommissioning of the Power Station Complex, the Gas Connection and the Electrical Connection, the constof the Northern Access Road, the Laydown Areas and landscaping (Work numbered 7 in Schedule 1 to the Order). The area in which the Scheme will be constructed, operated and decommissioned as defined by the Order Limits.

The applicant for the Application and the developer of the Scheme.

Measurement of electrical power.

Measurement of thermal power.

Unit of concentration of emission limit values.

A web-based mapping browser showing various geographical designations e.g. nature conservation sites, heritage sites.

Distinct natural areas of England, defined by a unique combination of landscape, biodiversity, geodiversity and cultural

In the area of the Scheme, the LTS is the PL1134 Barlaston to

A plan by a local Highway Authority that sets out a strategy for the future of transport in its area. The LTP for the administrative area of the Scheme is the Staffordshire Local Transport Plan 3, adopted by

Wildlife rich sites selected for their local nature conservation value. made deposits artificially placed comprising a wide variety of

typical of previously developed

Maintenance can comprise inspections, repair, adjustments or alterations, removal, refurbishments, reconstruction, replacements

The guidance produced by the Department for Transport and Communities and Local Government on road layout

and balancing the needs of different road users, with a focus on

The business park with extant planning permission (and bearing rences: 1998/35897/OUT and issued 1 May 2007,

2010/13609/EXT and 2014/21379/EXTO)) for 110,000 sqm of commercial, warehousing and business support activities on the MBP Site within which the majority of the Scheme will be

construction, operation, maintenance and eventual decommissioning of the Power Station Complex, the Gas Connection and the Electrical Connection, the construction and use of the Northern Access Road, the Laydown Areas and landscaping

The area in which the Scheme will be constructed, operated and decommissioned as defined by the Order Limits.

The applicant for the Application and the developer of the Scheme.

mapping browser showing various geographical designations e.g. nature conservation sites, heritage sites.

Distinct natural areas of England, defined by a unique combination of landscape, biodiversity, geodiversity and cultural and economic

Full Text Acronym

National Cycle Network

NCN

National Grid Company

NGC

National Monuments Record

NMR

National Nature Reserve

NNR

National Planning Policy Framework

NPPF

National Planning Practice Guidance

NPPG

National Policy Statements

NPS

National Transmission System

NTS

Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project

NSIP

National Air Traffic Control Services

NATS

Natural England NE

Nitrate Vulnerable Zone

NVZ

Nitrous oxides NOx

Noise Policy Statement for England

NPSE

Noise Sensitive Receptor

NSR

Non-Technical Summary

NTS

Northern Access Road

Okta -

Operation - Order -


Acronym Notes activity. A network of signed and promoted cycle routes across the UK.

National Grid's principal operations are the ownership and operation of regulated electricity and gas infrastructureCurrently known as English Heritage Archive.

Statutory designations, where places with wildlife or geological features that are significant at a national level.

The National planning policy framework for England, dated March 2012

The Planning Practice Guidance web based resource for England first introduced in March 2014 (and which largely supersededplanning policy statements (PPGs)) providing guidance on National planning policy and the operation of the planning systemOverarching legislative policy concerning the planning and consenting of NSIPs in the UK. The strategic natural gas pipeline serving the UK.

As defined by the PA 2008, which includes within the definition of an NSIP any onshore generating station in England and Wales ofMwe capacity or above.

-

The non-departmental government body responsible for England's natural environment. A designated area where land drains into and contfound in nitrate-polluted waters. One of the combustion products discharged by CCGT power stations .

Policy that sets out the long term vision of government noise policy.

Receptors principally residential dwellings (existing or for which planning consent is being sought/ has been given) and any building used for long term residential purposes (such as nursing home). The non-technical summary of the Environmental Statement.

The existing haul road to the MBP Site located off Meaford Road in the borough of Staffordshire being upgraded pursuant to the Order (work numbered 4 in Schedule 1 of the Order). A unit used in expressing the extent of cloud cover, equal to one eighth of the sky. The routine day to day functioning of the MEC. The Meaford Energy (Gas Fired Power Station) Order, being the


81

A network of signed and promoted cycle routes across the UK.

National Grid's principal operations are the ownership and operation of regulated electricity and gas infrastructure networks. Currently known as English Heritage Archive.

Statutory designations, where places with wildlife or geological features that are significant at a national level. The National planning policy framework for England, dated March

The Planning Practice Guidance web based resource for England first introduced in March 2014 (and which largely superseded planning policy statements (PPGs)) providing guidance on National planning policy and the operation of the planning system Overarching legislative policy concerning the planning and

The strategic natural gas pipeline serving the UK.

, which includes within the definition of an NSIP any onshore generating station in England and Wales of 50

departmental government body responsible for England's

A designated area where land drains into and contributes to nitrate

One of the combustion products discharged by CCGT power stations

Policy that sets out the long term vision of government noise policy.

Receptors principally residential dwellings (existing or for which planning consent is being sought/ has been given) and any building used for long term residential purposes (such as nursing home).

technical summary of the Environmental Statement.

The existing haul road to the MBP Site located off Meaford Road in the borough of Staffordshire being upgraded pursuant to the Order (work numbered 4 in Schedule 1 of the Order). A unit used in expressing the extent of cloud cover, equal to one

The routine day to day functioning of the MEC. The Meaford Energy (Gas Fired Power Station) Order, being the


82

Full Text Acronym

Order Land - Order Limits -

Ordnance Survey OS Otter Faeces Spraint Overhead Line OHL Part II A - Annual Average Flow Rate for surface water runoff

QBAR

Particulate Matter PM Pathway -

Peak Particle Velocity

PPV

PEIR site boundary

Percentage Heavy Goods Vehicles

%HGV

Permitted Development

-

Personal Protective Equipment

PPE

Pipeline Inspection Gauge

PIG

PA 2008 PA 2008

Planning Inspectorate

PINS

Pollution Prevention Guidance

PPG

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon

PAH

Potential Contaminant Linkages

PCL

PLANNING STATEMENT

Notes development consent order to be made by the Secretary of State authorising the Scheme, a draft of which is submitted with the Application (Document Reference 3.1) The land shown on the Land Plan which is within the Order Limits The limits shown on the Works Plans within which the Scheme may be carried out. National mapping agency for Great Britain - Network of overhead electricity transmission linesThe section of EPA 1990 that deals with contaminated land.-

Very small solid particles discharged by CCGT power stations.The route by which contamination moves from a source to a given receptor. A term used to measure vibration through a solid surface. When a vibration is measured, the point at which the measurement takes place can be considered to have a particle velocity.The wider site boundary identified for environmental survey purposes within the Preliminary Environmental Information Report.Percentage of traffic that is classified as Heavy Goods Vehicles in a 16hr period. Development that is deemed under legislation to have planning consent without the need to obtain planning permission. Equipment a person may wear to protect themselves from risks e.ghigh-visibility jackets, gloves, steel toe capped boots.

Pipeline cleaning device.

England and Wales legislation which established the legal framework to apply for, examine and determine applications for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects. Executive agency supported by the Department for Communitiand Local Government which deals with planning appeals, national infrastructure, planning applications, examinations of local plans and other planning related and specialist casework in England and Wales. Environment Agency published guidance on pollution prevention and best practice.

One of the combustion products discharged by CCGT power stations. The existence of a contamination source and a rpathway is also present linking the two.

development consent order to be made by the Secretary of State authorising the Scheme, a draft of which is submitted with the

The land shown on the Land Plan which is within the Order Limits The limits shown on the Works Plans within which the Scheme may

Network of overhead electricity transmission lines The section of EPA 1990 that deals with contaminated land.

Very small solid particles discharged by CCGT power stations. from a source to a given

A term used to measure vibration through a solid surface. When a vibration is measured, the point at which the measurement takes place can be considered to have a particle velocity. The wider site boundary identified for environmental survey purposes within the Preliminary Environmental Information Report. Percentage of traffic that is classified as Heavy Goods Vehicles in a

Development that is deemed under legislation to have planning consent without the need to obtain planning permission. Equipment a person may wear to protect themselves from risks e.g.

visibility jackets, gloves, steel toe capped boots.

England and Wales legislation which established the legal framework to apply for, examine and determine applications for

Executive agency supported by the Department for Communities and Local Government which deals with planning appeals, national infrastructure, planning applications, examinations of local plans and other planning related and specialist casework in England and

Agency published guidance on pollution prevention


The existence of a contamination source and a receptor where a

Full Text AcronymPower Station Complex

-

Preliminary Environmental Information Report

PEIR

Public Right of Way PRoW Pulverised Fuel Ash PFA Rail Bridge 104 -

Receptor -

Registered Parks and Gardens

-

Remediation -

River Basin Management Plan

RBMP

Scheduled Ancient Monument

SAM

SCC Highway Works

-

Scheme (also referred to as the "MEC")

-

Scoping Opinion -

Secretary of State SoS


Acronym Notes The building element of the power station, including gas turbine building, Stack(s), HRSG(s), transformers, steam turbine building, admin/control building, heat interface building, pressure regulation installation, water tanks, car parking, internal site rwater treatment plant, switchyard, switchgear room and surface and foul water drainage (please refer to Works numbered 1 and 6 in Schedule 1 to the Order). A report describing the preliminary environmental assessment during the pre-application process of an NSIP.

Paths on which the public have legally protected rights to pass. A solid waste product of coal fired power stations.The bridge known Railway Bridge 104 crossing the West Coast Mainline Railway at Grid reference SJ 891 371. An identified aspect of the environment - e.g. a resident, protected species, heritage asset, controlled water etc by the Scheme and, as such, has been assessed as part of the EIA undertaken. Gardens and designed landscapes of special architectural and historic importance, placed on a national register by English Heritage. The clean up of contaminated soil to make it suitable and safe for future use.

A management tool created by Environment Agency to use for integrated water resources management. A "nationally important" archaeological site or historic building, protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979. The construction of a new southern access by Staffordshire County Council to the MBP Site together with associated highway improvements including a new A34 Meaford Road roundabout, footpath/cycleway, lighting and landscaping at Meaford Road, Stone, Staffordshire to be carried out pursuant to the planning permission (bearing planning reference S.14/07) dated 16 January 2015. The construction, operation, maintenance and eventual decommissioning of the Power Station Complex, the Gas Connection and the Electrical Connection, the construction and use of the Northern Access Road, the Laydown Areas and landscaping (Work numbered 7 in Schedule 1 to the Order). The Scoping Opinion provided by the Secretary of State in April 2014 and included in the Appendices to the Environmental Statement (Document Reference 6.4 (section 5.1)). The decision maker for a NSIP application and head of the rgovernment department. In the context of the Scheme the decision maker is the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.


83

The building element of the power station, including gas turbine building, Stack(s), HRSG(s), transformers, steam turbine building, admin/control building, heat interface building, pressure regulation installation, water tanks, car parking, internal site roads, workshop, water treatment plant, switchyard, switchgear room and surface and foul water drainage (please refer to Works numbered 1 and 6

preliminary environmental assessment application process of an NSIP.

Paths on which the public have legally protected rights to pass. A solid waste product of coal fired power stations. The bridge known Railway Bridge 104 crossing the West Coast Mainline Railway at Grid reference SJ 891 371.

e.g. a resident, protected species, heritage asset, controlled water etc - that may be affected by the Scheme and, as such, has been assessed as part of the EIA

Gardens and designed landscapes of special architectural and historic importance, placed on a national register by English

The clean up of contaminated soil to make it suitable and safe for

A management tool created by Environment Agency to use for

A "nationally important" archaeological site or historic building, protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas

The construction of a new southern access by Staffordshire County Site together with associated highway

improvements including a new A34 Meaford Road roundabout, footpath/cycleway, lighting and landscaping at Meaford Road, Stone, Staffordshire to be carried out pursuant to the planning

ence S.14/07) dated 16 January

construction, operation, maintenance and eventual decommissioning of the Power Station Complex, the Gas Connection and the Electrical Connection, the construction and use

f the Northern Access Road, the Laydown Areas and landscaping (Work numbered 7 in Schedule 1 to the Order).

The Scoping Opinion provided by the Secretary of State in April 2014 and included in the Appendices to the Environmental Statement (Document Reference 6.4 (section 5.1)). The decision maker for a NSIP application and head of the relevant government department. In the context of the Scheme the decision maker is the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.


84

Full Text Acronym Severn Trent Water

STW

Site (also referred to as the "MEC Site")

-

Site of Nature Conservation Interest

SNCI

Site of Special Scientific Interest

SSSI

Site Waste Management Plan

SWMP

Sound Power Level SWL Sound Pressure Level

SPL

Special Area of Conservation

SAC

Special Landscape Areas

SLA

Special Protection Area

SPA

Stack -

Stafford Borough Council

SBC

Staffordshire County Council

SCC

Statement of Community Consultation

SoCC

SuDs Approval Body

SAB

Sulphur Oxides SOx

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems

SuDS

Switchgear -

Tonnes per annum tpa Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

TPH

Transport Analysis Guidance

TAG

PLANNING STATEMENT

Notes -


Non-statutory areas of local importance for nature conservation.

A geological or biological conservation designation denoting a protected area in the UK. The strategic document dealing with the effective management of materials used for the construction and the operation of the Scheme ensuring that waste is considered at all stages of the Scheme. The SWMP will form part of the CEMP for the Scheme. The Sound Energy flow per unit of time. Logarithmic measure of the sound pressure of a sound relative to a reference value, the threshold of hearing. Area of protected habitats and species as defined in the European Union's Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC). Local designation to provide protection for locally significant and attractive landscapes. A designated area for birds under the European Union Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds (2009/147/EC) The structure by which the exhaust gases and waste heat from the Scheme will be emitted to the atmosphere. . The borough council and relevant planning authority for the area within which the MEC Site is located. The county council and Highway Authority for the area in which the MEC Site is located. A statement describing how an applicant proposes to consult the local community about a project.

-

One of the combustion products discharged by CCGT power stations. -

The combination of switches, fuses or circuit breakers used to control, protect and isolate electrical equipment. Can be airinsulated or gas-insulated. Unit for measuring waste produced. One of the combustion products discharged by the type of power station proposed by the Scheme. Guidance from the Department for Transport on how to assess transportation schemes first published on 29 October 2013 and updated on 10 November 2014.


statutory areas of local importance for nature conservation.

A geological or biological conservation designation denoting a

The strategic document dealing with the effective management of materials used for the construction and the operation of the Scheme ensuring that waste is considered at all stages of the Scheme. The SWMP will form part of the CEMP for the Scheme.

Logarithmic measure of the sound pressure of a sound relative to a

species as defined in the European

Local designation to provide protection for locally significant and

under the European Union Directive on

The structure by which the exhaust gases and waste heat from the

relevant planning authority for the area

The county council and Highway Authority for the area in which the

t describing how an applicant proposes to consult the


The combination of switches, fuses or circuit breakers used to control, protect and isolate electrical equipment. Can be air-

One of the combustion products discharged by the type of power

Guidance from the Department for Transport on how to assess transportation schemes first published on 29 October 2013 and last

Full Text AcronymTree Preservation Order

TPO

Waste (England & Wales) Regulations 2011

-

Water Framework Directive

WFD

Water Resources Act 1991

WRA

Weighted Sound Reduction Index

Rw

Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981

World Health Organisation

WHO

Works Plans -

Zone of Theoretical Visibility

ZTV


Acronym Notes A written order made by the local authority which makes it an offence to intentionally damage or remove a tree protected by that order without the authority's permission. Legislations for the waste prevent, management and introduction of waste hierarchy. The regulations apply to England and Wales only. The Water Framework Directive is a European Union directive which commits EU member states to achieve good qualitative and quantitative status of all water bodies by 2015. Legislation to prevent and minimise pollution of wate

Single-number quantity which characterises the airborne sound insulation of a material or building element over a range of frequencies when tested in a laboratory. Legislation which protects animals, plants and certain habitats in the UK.

A United Nations agency concerned with public health.

The plans showing the numbered Works referred to in the Order and submitted with the Application (Document Reference 2.3). A computer generated plan showing a maximum area of the surroundings within which a project could theoretically be viewed.


85

A written order made by the local authority which makes it an offence to intentionally damage or remove a tree protected by that

Legislations for the waste prevent, management and introduction of waste hierarchy. The regulations apply to England and Wales

The Water Framework Directive is a European Union directive which commits EU member states to achieve good qualitative and quantitative status of all water bodies by 2015. Legislation to prevent and minimise pollution of water.

number quantity which characterises the airborne sound insulation of a material or building element over a range of

protects animals, plants and certain habitats in

A United Nations agency concerned with public health.

The plans showing the numbered Works referred to in the Order and submitted with the Application (Document Reference 2.3). A computer generated plan showing a maximum area of the

d theoretically be viewed.

5.2 Planning Statement

Documents

Transcript of 5.2 Planning Statement