50156-001: Muara Laboh Geothermal Power Project

Environmental and Social Monitoring Report (Part 3)

Project Number: 50156-001

January 2020

INO: Muara Laboh Geothermal Power Project (Republic of Indonesia) Semi-Annual Report (July to December 2017)

Prepared by PT Supreme Energy Muara Laboh for the Asian Development Bank

The Environment and Social Monitoring Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

ATTACHMENT 9

ATTENDANCE LIST OF MEETING

WITH NGO‐ICS

ATTACHMENT 10

INCIDENT REGISTER JULY UP TO DECEMBER 2017

ATTACHMENT 10 2H 2017

ACTIVITY Jul-

Dec DESCRIPTION

CORRECTIVE

ACTION PIC

DATE OF

TARGET STATUS

Number of

Occupational

Fatality Incident

(Company and

Contractor)

0 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Number of

Occupational

Lost Time

Incident

(Company and

Contractor)

0 ___ ___ ___ ___ ___

Number of

Medically

Treated

Incident

(Company and

Contractor)

1 ML-IR0178-0001 : 11 Nov 2017

During installing Quick Lock

Well Head and wing valve, four

people were standing on metal

plank scaffolding. 2 persons

were working on installing

Quick Lock Well Head nuts /

bolts and the other 2 persons

installing wing valve. When the

wing valve is lowered onto the

metal plank scaffolding, the

metal plank scaffolding

suddenly curved and

eventually broken. Four

personnel fell into the

wellhead cellar. Three persons

fell in a standing position, and

the other 1 roustabout fell in a

sitting position. When the

roustabout stood up, he

complained that his upper

right-hand felt sore. He then

was brought to the site medic

facility for observation and to

RSUD Muara Laboh hospital for

X-Ray. Results showed no new

fracture / dislocation was

observed.

a) Need certified

scafolder as

inspector / planne

Rig Mgr Done

b) Need to develop

scafolding tag to

identify that

scafolding’s construction is

inspected already or

not

HSE Done

c) Need general

design for

scafolding

construction for

cellar job

Rig Mgr Done

d) Provide cellar

cover

SEML Done

Number of First

Aid Treatment

(Company and

Contractor)

4 1) ML-IR0160-0001 : 31 Jul

2018 : DKB driver fell from

his motorcycle after office

hours near the Kampung

Baru Junction (offsite)

2) ML-IR0170-0001 : 31 Aug

2017 : A drilling crew stung

by bee on the rig floor

3) ML-IR0181-0001 : 21 Nov

2017 Incident flying

object (First Aid) at ML-F

(EPC-C)

4) ML-IR0189-0001: 29 Dec

2017 A Well Test crew

ACTIVITY Jul-

Dec DESCRIPTION

CORRECTIVE

ACTION PIC

DATE OF

TARGET STATUS

fell to cellar due to broken

wooden plank when tried to

close master valve of ML-A2.

IP has scratch at cheek.

Brought to nearest clinic,

received 1st Aid Treatment,

confirmed no serious injury,

and able to back to work.

Number of High

Potential

Serious

Incidents or

High Potential

Near

Misses/Near

Hits (Company

and Contractor)

1 1) ML-IR0177-0001: 03 Nov

2017 During POOH,

travelling block hit safety

timber bumper of crown

blocks causing the timber to

disintegrate and fell to rig

floor. Tool pusher instructed

all floor man to take cover

under doghouse. Failure of

crown-o-matic lever due to

improper connection (loose

bolting).

a) Develop Standard

Operation

Procedure to setting

Crown-O-Matic as

value and target to

achieved

Rig Mgr

15 Nov 17 Done

b) Develop Daily

Checklist for Crown-

O-Matic as enforce

Driller / Toolpusher

to do regularly

Crown-O-Matic

checking

Rig Mgr

15 Nov 17 Done

c) Make sure Driller /

Toolpusher fully

understand to

Crown-O-Matic

Setting & Checking

Procedure

Rig

Supt.

15 Nov 17 Done

Number of Near

Misses / Near

Hits (Company

and Contractor)

7 1) Near Miss : 19 Aug 2017: ML-

IR0161-0001

Schlumberger Cementing

Truck and EPC Dump Truck

were almost be in contact

2) Near Miss : 21 Aug 2017

Dump Truck Supplier is stuck

& mired

3) Near Miss: ML-IR0174 : 15

Oct 2017 A stone (size

approx’ 300mmx400mm)

slipped from a slope and

rolled down to the

excavation area, 1m away

from Rekin Engineers who

wanted to see the sub grade

test (Vane Shear Test). Slope

was 4m high and stone was

rolled from a position under

tarpauline / unseen.

4) ML-IR0173-0001 : 16 Oct

2017 During excavation

and installation of HDPE

liner, a worker used a stone

(approx 10kg weight) to hold

the HDPE liner from

windblow. Strong wind blew

the HDPE, caused the stone

to roll into the trench and

almost hit a worker's feet.

ACTIVITY Jul-

Dec DESCRIPTION

CORRECTIVE

ACTION PIC

DATE OF

TARGET STATUS

Will use sand bag to hold

the liner from windblow.

5) Near Miss : ML-IR0183-0001

: 26 Nov 2017 EPC-C

Dump truck was slip at the

road shoulder near with

EPC-C Site Office

6) ML-IR0184-0001 : 04 Dec

2017 EPC-C Dump truck

(supplier crash rock) was slip

at drainage STA 6000

7) ML-IR0186-0001 : 6 Dec

2017 EPC-C Dump Truck

(supplier crash rock) was

slipped at drainage channel

on front of SEML nursery

area

Number of

Incident /

Accident

(Company and

Contractor)

20 1) Minor Environmental Spill

:12 Jul 2017 : ML-IR0156-

0001 Vibro compactor

SAKAI hydraulic hose was

failure

2) Minor Property Damage :

21 Jul 2017 : ML-IR0157-

0001 PLTMH cable get

caugh cut off while rig

mobilization

3) Theft & Crime : ML-

IR0158-0001 : 21 Jul 2017

Camera trap lost


23 Aug 2017 ML-

IR0163-0001 Property

damage due to fallen tree

5) Theft&Crime : 27 Aug 2017

: ML-IR0164-

0001Indicator Lamp of

Water Pump was missing.

6) Minor Environmenttal Spill

: ML-IR0159-0001 : 30 Jul

2017 Grey water

discharged directly to

open ditch at Yard#3

7) Minor Vehicular Crash :

ML-IR0165-0001 : 1 Sept

2017 Light Vehicle PRA

plugged into roadside ditch

due to avoid collision with

the villager motorcycle

8) Minor Vehicle Crash : ML-

IR0166-0001 : 4 Sep 2017

Cement Truck vendor

of BAUER for hauling

cement bags to Muara

Laboh, suddenly truck

moved forward and hit the

front vehicle

9) Natural Phenomena : ML-

ACTIVITY Jul-

Dec DESCRIPTION

CORRECTIVE

ACTION PIC

DATE OF

TARGET STATUS

IR0167-0001 : 8 Sep 2017

Bangko Putih river flood

due to extreme heavy rain

and the bridge was

blocked

10) Minor Vehicle Crash: ML-

IR0168-0001 : 14 Sep 2017

EPC dump truck (base

course supplier) BM 9036

TN had single vehicle

accident, no one get

injured


ML-IR0169-0001 : 15 Sept

2017 3” HDPE pipe for utility water supply was

leak due to dig by loader

bucket teeth


ML-IR0171-0001 : 24 Sep

2018 4” HDPE pipe for fire hydrant HYD01 was

leak due to dig by bucket

teeth of backhoe loader

owned by WKS


IR0172-0001 : 26 Sep 2018

EPC Dump truck was

hauling material from ML-

B to Disposal area,

suddenly driver loss

control and caused single

vehicle incident (almost

flip over)


IR0175-0001: 24 Oct 2017

Side sweep between

crane mounted trailer

(WKS) and Innova (Rekind)

at access road near Yard 2.

R/H rear vender and lamp

were brushed. Narrow

road.


IR0176-0001: 25 Oct 2017

LV (BH-9808-GK)

suffered cracked at front

windshield due to stone

thrown by unknown when

crossing in front of EPC-C

labor camp.


ML-IR0179-0001 : 19 Nov

2017 Windshield glass

of SDI Slick line Logging

Unit in Wellpad ML-E was

broken due to throwing by

unidentified person

ACTIVITY Jul-

Dec DESCRIPTION

CORRECTIVE

ACTION PIC

DATE OF

TARGET STATUS


ML-IR0180-0001 : 19 Nov

2017 Convex mirror was

damaged at access road

ML-B


ML-IR0182-0001 : 21 Nov

2017 : Demolition of

traffic sign at access road

bangko putih

19) Minor vehicle Crash : ML-

IR0185-0001 : 6 Dec 2017

Rear collision between

security patrol car

SECURINDO and light

vehicle DKB on SEML site

office-parking area.


IR0187-0001 : 9 Dec 2017

Supplier Dump Truck

BM-9463 TS with driver

Adek, on the way he look

another Dump Truck (BA-

9952 S) have failure

engine/stoppage then he

took initiative to overtake

that stop car. His right tire

slipped into the drainage

channel.

ATTACHMENT 11

CAMERA TRAP LOCATIONS

No Camera Trap Code No Series Closed Location Coordinate Documentation Installed

1 SEML CT-005 B141005548 Access to Intake#1

47 m

UTM 0737719,

9819346

1403 mdpl

5-Sep-17 10-Oct-17 20-Nov-17 11-Jan-18


47 m

UTM 0737730,

9819335

1408 mdpl

5-Sep-17 10-Oct-17 20-Nov-17 11-Jan-18


47 m

UTM 0737679,

9819311

1387 mdpl

5-Sep-17 10-Oct-17 24-Nov-17 11-Jan-18

4 SEML CT-001 B141005553 Adjacent to ML-F

47 m

UTM 0736513,

9819645

1459 mdpl

15-Sep-17 15-Oct-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18

5 SEML CT-007 B141005546 Adjacent to ML-H

47 m

UTM 736727,

9819098

1586 mdpl

22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18


47 m

UTM 736665,

9819045

1549 mdpl

22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18


47 m

UTM 736719,

9819066

1599 mdpl

22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18


47 m

UTM 736853,

9819134

1542 mdpl

22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18


47 m

UTM 736686,

9819083

1573 mdpl

22-Sep-17 1-Nov-17 5-Dec-17 23-Jan-18

SEML CAMERA TRAP INSTALLATION

Download

ATTACHMENT 12

STAKEHOLDER MEETING CSR 2018

ATTENDANCE LIST

ATTACHMENT 13

SEML SOCIO‐ECONOMIC PROFILE

AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

OF COMMUNITIES AFFECTED

29112017

SOCIO-ECONOMICPROFILEAND

VULNERABILITYASSESSMENT

OFCOMMUNITIESAFFECTEDBY

PROJECTLANDACQUISITION

REVISEDFINALREPORT

PTSupremeEnergyMuaraLaboh

Geothermalpowerplantdevelopment

project1stphase90MW

(250MWinstalledcapacity)

SESVAFinalReportOktober2017SenttoClient i

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

Supreme EnergyMuara Laboh is developing a Geothermal Power Plant Project in Muara Laboh,

locatedinSouthSolokRegencyinWestSumatra.Currentlytheprojectisintheexploitationphase.

FinancialClosehasbeen reachedearly2017after financingagreementwassignedwith JBIC,ADB

andaseriesofcommercialbanks.CconstructionhasnowcommencedwithCommercialOperation

plannedtostartin2019.

Likeothergeothermaldevelopments,theprojectrequiresacomparativelysmallfootprint,forStage

1developmentonly71hectares.Thecompanyhassofaracquired141hectaresofland,grantedto

PTSEMLbyvirtueoflocationpermitissuedbytheSolokSelatanRegent(DecreeNo540-94-2013).

The land, designated by the government as other use area (APL=area penggunaan lain) was

formerlydevelopedasteaplantationbytheDutchEasternIndiesCompanyaround100yearsago.

AfterIndependence,aroundthe1970s,PTPekoninarestartedoperationoftheteaplantationunder

therighttocultivate(HGU)schemewhilethenationalgovernmenthadownershipoftheland.After

thecompanyceaseditsoperationaround30yearsago,thelandwasreturnedtothegovernment,

andhassincebeenusedbythelocalcommunitiesforirrigatedriceanddrylandfarming.

PTSEMLidentified202householdsandafewfarminggroupswhomtheycompensatedona‘willing

buyer-willingseller’basis.Therewasnoinvoluntaryrelocationasallaffectedhouseholdshavebeen

compensatedabovethemarketpriceandapproximately10timesthetaxablevalue(NJOP).Atthe

time of compensation, no detailed socio-economic study was undertaken by SEML, however the

landacquisitionprocess isdocumentedandwasbasedon fairandopennegotiationsbetweenPT

SEMLandaffectedpeople,includingoversightbythegovernmentandlocalelders.

PTSEML instructed IntiHexaSemesta todevelopaCommunityDevelopmentProgramwith those

communities affected by the land acquisition. In 2015, IHS undertook a study with the 75

householdswhoresideinthenearbyvillages inring1.AnIntegratedSocialDevelopmentProgram

(ISDP)was developed based on the findings of that study. TheADB social audit corrective action

planrecommendedtheneedofacomprehensivesocioeconomicbaselineandsurveyprofilingand

vulnerabilityassessmentofalloftheaffected202householdsthathavebeencompensatedaspart

ofthelandacquisitionprocessfortheproject.

ThepresentstudycarriedoutbyPTGreencap/ESC,namelySocio-EconomicSurveyandVulnerability

Assessment (SESVA), covers the remaining households in the other villages in the vicinity of the

project. In addition to the socioeconomic profile and vulnerability assessment, the present study

alsoincludesidentificationoflivelihoodandskillsdevelopmentopportunitiestounderstandcurrent

needs for and community perception on livelihood and skills training and consultation with

governmentandeducational institutionstounderstandcurrentavailablefaciltiesthatareonoffer

to support livelihood and skills development training. The results will be used to refine the

Company’sownIntegratedSocialDevelopmentProgram(ISDP).

TheSESVAstudyhasbeencarriedout fromDecember2016toApril2017,coveringa totalof133

households affected by SEML land acquisition, 4 (four) targeted focus group discussions with

potentially vulnerable segments of the community and traditionalMinang women leaders and 6

(six)keyinformantinterviewswithrelevantgovernmentandothereducationalinstitutions.Thefield

activitieswerecarriedoutasperfollowing:

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx ii

1. ScopingVisit(26-30December2016)

2. Socio-EconomicProfileandVulnerabilitySurvey(1-7February2017),and

3. FocusedGroupDiscussion(FGD)andKeyInformantInterview(KII)(12-17March2017).

Thefindingsofthestudyareasfollows:

SocioEconomicProfile

• ThepovertylineforSolokSelatanRegencyfor2015isRp292,292permonthwhichisalmost

Rp100,000lowerthanthatoftheProvincewhilearoundRp40,000lowerthantherural

averageacrossIndonesia.

• ThemajorityoftherespondentsidentifiedasethnicMinang(93%).TherestareMelayu

(3%),Javanese(1%)andotherethnicgroups(1%).InactualfacttheMelayuthemselvesare

asubgroupofMinang.PeoplefromJavaandotherpartsofIndonesiamigratedtothearea

becauseofseveralreasonsincludingworkinginDutchplantationinPekoninaandeconomic

reason.TheTownofMuaraLabohisinfactanoldDutchTown.

• SESVAsurveyrespondentsaremostlymenandwomenof40to60yearsold.Mostofthem

felthealthyduringthesurveyandveryfewindicatedfeelingunwell.Membersoffamilies

rangefrom4to5members,whichisslightlybiggerthanthenationalaverageof3.9.The

dependencyratioofSESVArespondentsis43%,whichislowerthanthenational

dependencyrateof51%.

• Intermsofliteracyandeducationalattainment,mostofallmenandwomensurvey

respondentsindicatedthattheycanread,onlyoldergroupofpeople,mainlywomen,who

areperceivedhavingliteracydifficulties(illiterate).Householdmembersaged20andolder

(uptotheageof49)morethanhalfbothmaleandfemalehavefinishedseniorhighschool

orhaveattainedtertiaryeducation.Womenseemtobeingeneralbettereducatedthan

menandhigherintertiaryratio.Theolderorseniorpeoplehaveonlycompletedprimary

schoolornotfinishedschool.

• Majorityofthosewholookforworksaremenbetween20and30yearsold,whiletotal

laborparticipationoftherespondentsis60%.

• 93householdsstillhavelandwithinPTSEMLarea(indicatedtobeabout245haaccording

tothesurvey),mainlyintheformofdryland(84%)andwetland(13%).9outof133

householdsusedthecompensationmoneytobuynewland(intotal5haor0.04haon

averageperhousehold),intheformofdryland(69%)andwetland(39%).17outof133

householdsindicatedthattheyownorsharecropotherlandof8ha.

• Inregardstolandownershipandstatus,majorityoftheremaininglandarewithoutpapers

(50%),withvillageheadnotice(30%),andonlyafewsaidtheyhadalandtitle/certificates

(12%).34%ofhouseholdsindicatedtheyinheritedtheland,while18%boughttheland.

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx iii

PerceptiontowardtheProject

• TheProjectAffectedHouseholds(PAHH)withintheSESVAscopehavenotallbeenawareof

theCompany’sGrievanceMechanism.Someofthemareawarethattherearegrievances

raisedbycommunitiestowardSEML.Majorityoftherespondentsalsoimpliedthatlodging

grievancenotdifficult.TheresponsetimefromSEMLanditsmaincontractortowardthe

grievancesareconsideredquitefastaswellastheresponsesandresolutionstothe

grievances.SEMLemployeesassignedforgrievancehandlingmechanismaremorewell-

knownthanthirdpartypeopleappointedbySEMLforGMcontact.

• IntermsoftheProject’slandacquisition,majorityofthelandacquisitionaffected

householdsarehappywithprocessandfoundittobefairandthattheywoulddoitagainif

theyweretoreturntothattime.SmallpercentageofPAHHsaidthepricewaslowandthat

theyhadnochoicebuttoletgo.

• ThenumberofPAHHwhoworkforSEMLoritssuppliers/contractorsisverylow,

nonethelessthepercentageoflocalworkerscomparedtomigrantworkersishigher(SEML

monthlyreport).AlmosthalfoftherespondentswereawareofSEMLCSRprogramsdespite

thenumberorlevelofparticipationandbeneficiariesofthePAHHintheprogramislowas

wellastheirsatisfaction.

• IntermsofSEMLCommunityCommittee,almosthalfoftherespondentswereawareofthe

Committee.(NotethatSEML’scommunityengagementuntilrecentlyfocusedmainlyonring

1villages,whicharethe5villagesthatsurroundtheproject).

Vulnerabilities

• Vulnerabilityisassessedbasedonanumberofsecurityaspects,i.e.food,social,economic,

environment,healthandotheraspects,gender,educationalattainment,andsatisfaction

withSEMLlandacquisition.Householdsassessmenttowardthevariousvulnerability

indicatorsisasfollows

o Noneofthesurveyedhouseholdsreportedtohaveexperiencedstarving.

o Intermsofsocialsecurity,themajoritydonotactivelyparticipateinvillage

organizations.Ineventsoffamilyorneighborhoodmattersandconflictsthe

communityappearstostillhavestrongsupportfromfamilyandvillageapparatus.

o Intermsofeconomicsecurity,onlyafewreportedtobeunemployed.5households

wereidentifiedaspotentiallyvulnerableintermsofdebtpressure(thatismonthly

installmentsversushouseholdincome).

o Morethanathirdofhouseholdscollectwoodforfiringtheircookingstoves.

o Onlyafewhouseshadeitherroofsmadefromthatchedstrawandorwooden

planksorearthernfloors.

o Inregardstoenvironmentalsecurity,only1householdreportedthathis/herfamily

wasaffectedbynaturaldisaster.

o Intheaspectofhealthsecurity,15householdsindicatedthatoneoftheirfamily

membershadamajorhealthproblemandintermsofsanitationandaccessto

water,17%useriverwaterfordefecationand5%usecommunaltoilet.

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx iv

o Genderwise,24womenbetween27to58yearsoldindicatedcompletedifeveronly

primaryschoolandnotworking.

o Intermsofeducationalattainment,12youngsters(betweentheage20and30)

identifiedonlyfinishedprimaryschoolandnotmarried.Twooutofthe12were

reportedtohavingdifficultiesinreading.

o IntermsofsatisfactionofthepriceofSEMLlandacquisition,5householdsindicated

thattheywerenotsatisfied.

• Based on the above vulnerability indicators, 18 households have been identified as

vulnerableorpotentiallyvulnerable,theyeitherapplytomorethanoneofthevulnerability

indicators (6 households) or have a low per capita income (11 households) or high debt

pressureversusincome(1household).Atotalnumberof19householdswerealsoidentified

as vulnerable because they tick two vulnerability indicators. These households could be

potentiallyvulnerableorbecomevulnerablewhenasuddenchangeoflifehappens,suchas

forexampleanillnessthatpreventsthemainbreadwinnertocontinuetoworkorbecoming

unemployedforavarietyofreasons.

SkillandLivelihoodDevelopment(CapacityBuilding)

• Like other newly split and established regency, Solok Selatan try to improve economy,

revenue and welfare of the people. Government institutions such as social, labor and

transmigrationagencyprovidescapacitybuildingprogramtoworkersalthoughitislimited.

AnumberofeducationalinstitutionssuchasVocationalHighSchoolorSMKareavailablein

theRegencyespeciallyaroundtheMuaraLabohvicinity.CommunityAcademy,aDiploma3

certificate,isestablishedbytheRegencygovernmentincollaborationwithPoliteknikNegeri

Padang. SEML may cooperate or partner with relevant government agencies and local

vocational educational institutions to implement its skill or capacity and livelihood

developmentprogram.

• Themain pressing security issue thatmight thwart capacity building program is livestock

theft. Livestock theft is alarming that even though the Project affected people suggested

support to livestockprogram, theyare stillworriedwith theft especially if livestock farms

arefarfromwheretheylive.

• The project affected people have lack of trust toward the village elites and they are

pessimistic to work in a group based on previous capacity building implemented by the

Governmentintheregion.

• Thefutureskillandlivelihooddevelopmentprogramshouldconsiderthefollowingaspects:

Individual or bundled base program rather than group base; Needs base; Sustainability;

Communal Base, Gender equality; Flexible mode of debt/loan payment; Assisting the

families/householdswhosupportvulnerablepeople;andPartnershipandengagementwith

localstakeholders.

In general, the Project affected people have eagerness to improve their livelihood and economic

condition.DuringFGD, they suggestedcapacitybuilding through trainingandskilldevelopment in

agriculture, livestock, furniture/carpentry, business development, cooking, food industry, and

embroidery;provisionofcapital;andprovisionofcapitalgoods.

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx v

In summary, of the 133 households, around 13.5% have been identified as most likely to be

vulnerable while another 14.3% are potentially vulnerable. Whether this vulnerability has been

causeddue to land acquisition by SEML is not confirmed at this stage. The results of the various

parts of the study fit well together and confirm individual findings. The major issues can be

summarisedareevolvingaroundeducation,financeandbusinessdevelopment.

CurrentCSRandStakeholderengagementactivitiesofSEMLuntilnowhavefocusedmainlyonring1

PAHH.With the construction stagenow started, SEML is expanding this to theother rings and in

particular to all of thePAHH thatwereaffectedby landacquisition, inparticular those thatwere

identifiedasbeingvulnerable.TostrengthenSEML’sapproachaspecificlivelihoodrestorationplan

forthoseidentifiedasmostvulnerableshouldbedevelopedthatlinksinwithexistinggovernment

programsinadditiontoCSRactivitiesthatfocusoncapacitybuilding.

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx vi

TABLEOFCONTENTS

EXECUTIVESUMMARY........................................................................................................................i

TABLEOFCONTENTS........................................................................................................................vi

LISTOFFIGURE...............................................................................................................................viii

LISTOFTABLE...................................................................................................................................ix

LISTOFAPPENDICES.........................................................................................................................xi

ABBREVIATIONS..............................................................................................................................xii

1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1

1.1 PTSupremeEnergyMuaraLabohProject.......................................................................1

1.2 Landacquisition.............................................................................................................1

1.3 Presentstudyaim,targetandlocationsbrief.................................................................2

2 SEMLCSRANDOTHERENGAGEMENTACTIVITIESTODATE......................................................3

2.1 CorporateSocialResponsibilityProgram........................................................................3

2.2 Grievancemechanism....................................................................................................3

3 OBJECTIVEOFSTUDY...............................................................................................................5

4 METHODOLOGY&APPROACH.................................................................................................6

4.1 Literaturereview...........................................................................................................6

4.1.1 DefinitionofVulnerability..........................................................................................6

4.1.2 IndonesianGovernmentPovertyindicators...............................................................7

4.2 Scoping..........................................................................................................................8

4.3 Socio-EconomicSurveyandVulnerabilityAssessment(Questionnaire)........................11

4.4 FocusGroupDiscussion(FGD)......................................................................................12

4.4.1 SelectionProcessofVulnerableGrouptobeincludedinFGDs...............................13

4.4.2 ClassificationofgroupsforFGD...............................................................................13

4.4.3 TheimplementationofFGD.....................................................................................14

4.5 KeyInformantInterview(KII).......................................................................................17

4.6 ChallengesandLimitations...........................................................................................18

4.6.1 Scopingstudy............................................................................................................18

4.6.2 Householdsurveyforsocio-economicandvulnerabilityassessment......................18

4.6.3 FGDandKII...............................................................................................................18

4.6.4 Questionnaireandanalysis.......................................................................................19

5 SOCIO-ECONOMICPROFILE....................................................................................................20

5.1 Demographics..............................................................................................................20

5.2 Families,familycomposition,agestructureandgender...............................................22

5.3 SkillsandLivelihood.....................................................................................................25

5.3.1 OccupationsofHouseholdMembers.......................................................................25

5.3.2 PerceivedAdultLiteracy...........................................................................................26

5.3.3 EducationalAttainment............................................................................................27

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx vii

5.4 LandOwnershipandAssets..........................................................................................28

5.5 IncomeandExpenditures.............................................................................................30

6 COMMUNITYPERCEPTIONOFTHEPROJECT..........................................................................31

6.1 Community’sunderstandingofGrievanceMechanism.................................................33

6.2 Community’ssatisfactionwiththelandacquisitionprocess.........................................35

6.3 Community’sunderstandingofCurrentSEMLCSRProgram.........................................36

6.4 Community’sunderstandingofCommunityCommittee...............................................37

7 VULNERABILITYASSESSMENT................................................................................................40

7.1 Screeningofresults......................................................................................................40

7.1.1 Foodsecurity............................................................................................................40

7.1.2 SocialSecurity...........................................................................................................40

7.1.3 Economicsecurity.....................................................................................................43

7.1.4 Environmentalsecurity.............................................................................................47

7.1.5 Healthsecurity..........................................................................................................47

7.1.6 OtherVulnerabilityIndicators..................................................................................49

7.1.7 SummaryofVulnerabilityAssessment.....................................................................50

7.2 ResultsfromFGDs........................................................................................................55

8 SKILLSANDLIVELIHOODDEVELOPMENT................................................................................56

8.1 ReviewofskillandcapacitybuildingprogramcurrentlyonofferbySEML....................56

8.2 ResultsfromFGDsandKIIs...........................................................................................57

8.2.1 Existingcapacitybuildingprogram...........................................................................57

8.2.2 Challengeandlimitationofcurrentcapacitybuilding..............................................58

8.2.3 Solutionforeconomicandwelfareimprovement....................................................59

8.2.4 NeedsandExpectation.............................................................................................60

9 DISCUSSIONANDRECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................60

9.1 IdentifiedneedsfromVulnerabilityAssessmentandSocioEconomicProfile.................60

9.2 IdentifiedneedsfromCommunityandprioritization....................................................61

9.2.1 PresentdayCSRprogramsufficienttocoverorwhatitalreadycover....................63

9.2.2 Availability of local government/public and private educational/vocational

trainingsforskillsdevelopment/improvement..................................................................64

9.3 RecommendationofthefutureCommunityCapacityBuilding.....................................65

10 CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................................68

11 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................70

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx viii

LISTOFFIGURE

Figure2-1 GrievanceMechanism....................................................................................................4

Figure4-1 Human Development Index compared (BPS Sumatra Barat and Indonesia),

2017...............................................................................................................................7

Figure4-2 MapofproposedsurveyedprojectaffectedlandownersforSESVAstudy.................10

Figure5-1 Domicileofthe133surveyedhouseholds...................................................................20

Figure5-2 Ethnicbackgroundofsurveyedhouseholds.................................................................20

Figure5-3 JorongswithethnicgroupsotherthanMinaninsurveyedhouseholds......................21

Figure5-4 Ageandgenderofrespondents1and2......................................................................21

Figure5-5 Self-assessedHealthstatus..........................................................................................22

Figure5-7 Householdstructure–householdmembers................................................................23

Figure5-8 HouseholdMembers....................................................................................................24

Figure5-9 Theagerangeofthedifferentfamilymembers..........................................................24

Figure5-10 Main(a)andSecondary(b)OccupationofHouseholdHead.......................................25

Figure5-11 Main(a)andSecondary(b)OccupationsofWife........................................................26

Figure5-12 Otherhouseholdmembersmaineconomicactivity,N=16..........................................26

Figure5-15 EducationalAttainmentofAdults,aged20andolder.................................................27

Figure5-16 EconomicActivityofsurveyedHouseholds..................................................................28

Figure9-1 VulnerableGroups,needsandexpectations...............................................................61

Figure9-2 Percentageandtypeofrequestedcapacitybuilding...................................................62

Figure9-3 Typeofrequestedtrainings/skilldevelopment...........................................................63

Figure11-1 IdentificationofSESVArespondentinPakanSalasa..................................................105

Figure11-2 IdentificationofSESVArespondentnearMuaraLabohMarket................................105

Figure11-3 SESVArespondentinfrontofhishouseandshop.....................................................105

Figure11-4 IdentificationofSESVARespondent...........................................................................105

Figure11-5 IdentificationofSESVArespondent...........................................................................105

Figure11-6 IdentificationofSESVArespondentinLolo................................................................105

Figure11-7 SESVAhouseholdsurveybeingcarriedoutbyenumerators fromUniversitas

Andalas.......................................................................................................................106

Figure11-8 SESVArespondentinfrontofherhouse....................................................................106

Figure11-9 SESVArespondentinherhouse.................................................................................106

Figure11-10 HouseconditionofoneofSESVArespondents..........................................................106

Figure11-11 TheconditionofkictheninoneofSESVArespondents'house..................................106

Figure11-12 Smallchickenandducklivestockwhichiscommonamongcommunities.................106

Figure11-13 SEML representatives duringWomen Group FGD,Mr. Asyarry Sofyan (Site

SupportManager)andMr.MuhammadRoza(FieldRelationsOfficer).....................107

Figure11-14 Mr. Bujang Joang (SEML Field RelationsOfficer ) socialized contact number

forSEMLGrievanceMechanism................................................................................107

Figure11-15 MenGroupDiscussion...............................................................................................107

Figure11-16 OneofMenFGDparticipantsintroducedhimself.....................................................107

Figure11-17 YouthFGD..................................................................................................................107

Figure11-18 BundoKanduang/WomenLeaderFGD......................................................................107

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx ix

Figure11-19 OneofwomenleaderspresentedtheiropinionduringFGD.....................................108

Figure11-20 DR.Indraddin,FGDfacilitatorfromUniversitasAndalas...........................................108

Figure11-21 Key Informant InterviewwithDR.Syamsurizaldi,S.IP,SE,MM,HeadofSolok

Regency's Regional office of Planning, Development, and Ivestment

(BPPMD/BAPPEDA)....................................................................................................108

Figure11-22 CookingTrainingintheCenterofWorkTraining(BLK)..............................................108

LISTOFTABLE

Table1-1 Fieldtrips/studies...........................................................................................................2

Table4-1 DefinitionofVulnerabilitybyInternationalBanks.........................................................6

Table4-2 PovertyLine....................................................................................................................8

Table4-3 Landownerswhonolongeravailableforsurvey.........................................................11

Table4-4 ResourcePersonsforSESVASurvey.............................................................................11

Table4-5 ListofMenFGDParticipants........................................................................................14

Table4-6 ListofWomenFGDParticipants...................................................................................14

Table4-7 ListofYouthFGDParticipants......................................................................................15

Table4-8 ListofBundoKanduang/WomenLeaderFGDParticipants..........................................16

Table4-9 Attendance,participationandinsightofFGDparticipants..........................................17

Table5-1 DependencyandGenderRatio....................................................................................23

Table5-2 Laborparticipationrate...............................................................................................28

Table5-3 LandAssetsofthe133households,SESVASurvey2017.............................................29

Table5-4 IncomeRangeofSurveyedHouseholds,N=133(inRupiah)........................................30

Table5-5 MonthlyExpenditureRangeofSureveyedHouseholds,N=133(inRupiah)................30

Table6-1 Respondentsawareness(heard)ofSEMLGrievanceMechanism...............................33

Table6-2 ThesourceofinformationaboutGrievanceMechanism.............................................33

Table6-3 DifficultiesinlodgingGrievances.................................................................................34

Table6-4 AwarenessofgrievancestowardSEMLinthecommmunity.......................................34

Table6-5 TypesofgrievancesaddressedtoSEML.......................................................................34

Table6-6 PerceivedSEMLresponsestowardgrievances............................................................35

Table6-7 PerceivedresponsivenessofSEMLtowardgrievances(quickness).............................35

Table6-8 Dotheyknowwhotocontactforgrievances?.............................................................35

Table6-9 Whotoreportto?........................................................................................................35

Table6-10 HaveyoueverworkedorareworkingforSEMLorcontractors/suppliers?................36

Table6-11 Awareness(Heard)ofSEMLCSR/ISDP.........................................................................36

Table6-12 ParticipatedorbeneficiariesofSEMLCSR/ISDP...........................................................37

Table6-13 PerceptionaboutSEMLCSR/ISDP................................................................................37

Table6-14 AwarenessofComunityCommittee............................................................................38

Table6-15 SourceofinformationaboutCommunityCommittee.................................................38

Table6-16 ParticipationinCommunityCommitteeevents/activities...........................................38

Table6-17 PerceptiontowardtheperformanceandbenefitsofCommunityCommittee............39

Table7-1 Activeinvillageorganizations......................................................................................40

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx x

Table7-2 Typeofvillageorganizations/activities........................................................................41

Table7-3 Whoisconsultedforfamilymatters?..........................................................................42

Table7-4 Whoisconsultedforneighborhoodmatters?.............................................................42

Table7-5 Typesocialconflict.......................................................................................................43

Table7-6 Reasonsfortakingoutaloan.......................................................................................45

Table7-7 Debtpressureof12households..................................................................................45

Table7-8 HouseholdswithMonthlyPerCapitaIncomenearorbelowPovertyLine..................46

Table7-9 Householdsimpactedbynaturaldisasters..................................................................47

Table7-10 ReportedHealthIssues................................................................................................47

Table7-11 AccesstoWater,Numberofhouseholds.....................................................................48

Table7-12 IdentifiedVulnerableandPotentiallyVulnerableSurveyedPAHH..............................52

Table8-1 ExistingSEMLCapacityDevelopmentProgram............................................................56

Table8-2 ListofNeedsandExpectationsforSkillandLivelihoodDevelopment.........................60

Table9-1 Proposed future capacity building for project affected people/vulnerable

people..........................................................................................................................67

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx xi

LISTOFAPPENDICES

AppendixI a ListofProjectAffectedHouseholds

b ListofVulnerableHouseholds

AppendixII Questionnaire

AppendixIII KIIAndFGDGuideline

AppendixIV ActivitiesPhotographs

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx xii

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB AsianDevelopmentBank

CSR CorporateSocialResponsibility

EPC Engineering,ProcurementandConstruction

FGD FocusedGroupDiscussion

GM GrievanceMechanism

HDI HumanDevelopmentIndex

IFC InternationalFinanceCorporation

ISDP IntegratedSocialDevelopmentProgram

KII KeyInformantInterview

PAHH ProjectAffectedHouseholds

PAP ProjectAffectedPeople

SEML PTSupremeEnergyMuaraLaboh

SEP StakeholderEngagementPlan

SESVA Socio-EconomiSurveyandVulnerabilityAssessment

SESVARevisedFinalReport29November2017SenttoClientntc.docx 1

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PTSupremeEnergyMuaraLabohProject

Supreme Energy Muara Laboh is developing a Geothermal Power Plant Project in Muara

Laboh, located in South Solok Regency in West Sumatra. Currently the project is in the

exploitationphase.FinancialClosehasbeenreachedendofJanuary2017(afterthefinancing

agreement was signed with JBIC, ADB and a series of commercial banks). Engineering

procurementandconstructionhasnowbegunwhilecommercialoperationisplannedtostart

by2019.

The ADB social audit corrective action recommended the need of a comprehensive

socioeconomic baseline and survey profiling and vulnerability assessment of the 202

households that have been compensated as part of the land acquisition process for the

project.Theresultsof this studywillbeusedto refine theCompany’sown IntegratedSocial

DevelopmentProgram(ISDP).

The revised ISDP will be developed in line with the company’s commitment to the

communities surrounding the project, in particular those affected by the previous, ongoing

andfutureprojectoperations(exploration,construction,operation,andpost-operation).The

ISDPaddressesadverse impactsand implementsvariousactivities thatarebeneficial for the

communities based on community needs and expectations. The company’s community

relationsteamhasalreadybeguntoimplementtheCSR.

1.2 Landacquisition

Likeothergeothermaldevelopments,theprojectrequiresacomparativelysmallfootprint.The

total area required for Stage 1 development is only 71 hectares. The company has already

acquiredmorethan141hectareswhichismorethansufficientforthetotalprojectfootprint.

The site is locatedonAPL (ex-HGU) land (PTPekonina'splantation’s teapermitarea),which

has been utilized by the community for wet rice fields, coffee and quinine planting, and

generalcommunityland(settlementsandcultivation).

TheCompanyhasaletterfromtheSolokSelatanRegencyRegionalDevelopmentPlanningand

CapitalInvestmentBoardconfirmingthattheProject’slanduse(i.e.forelectricitygeneration)

is in accordance with the Regency Detailed Spatial Plan (Location permit Letter No.

540.542.257.2010,19-8-2010andLetterNo050/43/BPPPMD-2013,4March2013).

Although the project area has been granted by the government to PT SEML by virtue of

location permit issued by the Solok Selatan Regent (Decree No 540-94-2013), the company

nevertheless pursued land acquisition and compensation involving 202 households on a

‘willing buyer-willing seller’ basis. There was no involuntary relocation as all affected

householdshavebeencompensatedabovethemarketpriceandapproximately10timesthe

taxablevalue(NJOP).The landacquisitionprocess isdocumentedandwasbasedonfairand

open negotiations between PT SEML and affected people, including oversight by the

governmentandlocalelders.Detailsonthecompensationprocess,theaffectedpeople, land

area and crops compensated and actual compensation amounts can be found in the ESIA

documentandpertaininedAppendices.


1.3 Presentstudyaim,targetandlocationsbrief

Thescopeofthisstudywasthreefold,

• Activity 1: Socio-Economic Profile of affected households and vulnerability/needs

assessment- to gather an understanding of the current socioeconomic livelihood

situationofaffectedhouseholdsandtoassessthevulnerabilityoftheseinlightofthe

landthathasbeenacquiredaspartfotheproject.

• Activity 2: Identification of livelihood and skill development opportunities - to

understand current needs for and community perception on livelihood and skills

trainingthattheaffectedhouseholdsrequiretoreducetheirvulnerability

• Activity3:Consultationwithgovernmentandeducationalinstitutions-tounderstand

currentfacilitiesandtrainingthatisonofferbythegovernmentandothereducational

instituitions.

The Socio Economic andVulnerabilityAssessment (SESVA) employs a rangeofmethods, i.e.

HouseholdSocio-EconomicandVulnerabilitySurvey,Key Informant Interview(KII)andFocus

GroupDiscussion(FGD)toexplorefurtherneedsandaspirationfromaffectedcommunitiesfor

skill and livelihood development as well as company document and activities review and

interviewswithgovernmentinstitutionstoexaminehowbesttheseneedsandaspirationscan

beaddressed.

Followingisasummaryofthefieldvisitactivitiesthatwerepartofthisstudy.

Table1-1 Fieldtrips/studies

ScopingStudy 26-30December2016

Socio-EconomicandVulnerabilitySurvey 1-7February2017

FocusGroupDiscussion(FGD)andKey

InformantInterview(KII)

12-17March2017


2 SEMLCSRANDOTHERENGAGEMENTACTIVITIESTODATE

2.1 CorporateSocialResponsibilityProgram

SEMLhas started its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)programasearly as 2011.All CSR

programs developed up to date were derived from stakeholder meetings. The 2016 CSR

programwasdesignedbasedon the StakeholderMeeting inOctober 2015. Thebudget and

activitiesaredistributedacross4pillars: Infrastructure,Health,EconomicEmpowermentand

CommunityRelations.In2016moreisinvestedintotheinfrastructurepillar.Around31%was

planned to be used for building classrooms for schools with the aim to improve local

communityaccesstoeducation.Another8%areallocatedtothehealthpillar.Moneywillbe

spent on mass circumcision for around 60 children in the four villages near the project

location.FortheEconomicEmpowermentactivitiesaround10%ofthetotalbudgetisspentto

support potential livelihood opportunities such as fresh water fish breeding. For the

community relations pillar the remainder of the budget is spent which helps to maintain

community support and relationship and to support existing government programs. A total

budgetofUSD99,300wasspentduring2016.

2.2 Grievancemechanism

Thegrievancemechanismhasrecentlybeenupdatedandseveralmeetingshavetakenplace

with the community to disclose the new mechanism (see flowchart in below figure). The

grievancemechanismhas been integrated into the Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) that

was also recently updated and completed. Contact details of relevant staff at site and in

JakartaarealsolistedintheSEP.

The company keeps records of all grievances received and response appropriately to these

according to the mechanism set out. Public consultation and disclosure of information

activitiesarealsorecorded.


Figure2-1 GrievanceMechanism


3 OBJECTIVEOFSTUDY

Thedetailedscopeincludesthefollowing:

(1) Socio-EconomicProfileofaffectedhouseholdsandvulnerability/needsassessmentof202

households to assess current livelihood status of economically displaced households

whoselandsorratherpartsthereofhavebeenacquiredbythecompanyforprojectuse.

Theaimofthesurveyandassessmentisto

a. Coverarepresentativesamplebymeansofasoundmethodologicalapproach

b. Understand household income and generation of income from productive land

(retrospectively)toshowextentofeconomicdisplacement

c. Identifymostvulnerablehouseholds

d. Verifycompensationversusreplacementcosts

e. Showhowcompensationwasinvestedandwherehouseholdsareatnow

f. Identify any change in quality of life based on economic indicators and people’s

perceptions

(2) Identification of livelihood and skill development opportunities through community

consultationwithaffectedhouseholdsthatareincludedintheISDP

a. ExaminethevariousactivitiesidentifiedintheISDPandusefulnesstocommunityas

wellasidentifyotheractivities

b. Developbudgetforproposedactivitiesimplementationandtimeboundactionplan

(3) Conduct consultation with relevant government agencies and academic/educational

institutionsto

a. Understandexistingavailabilityofregionaltrainingfacilitiesforskillsdevelopment

b. Understandneedsandprioritiesofcommunitiesonskillsdevelopmentandtraining

initiatives


4 METHODOLOGY&APPROACH

4.1 Literaturereview

A short literature review was carried out to update ESC’s current socio-economic census

surveywithcurrentpracticesinthefieldandguidelinesbyInternationallenders.Otheronline

resources were also accessed, such as Badan Pusat Statistik for the latest statistics and

definitionofpovertyandthepovertylineinPadang.

4.1.1 DefinitionofVulnerability

Different disciplines weigh different aspects of vulnerability greater than others, some

disciplines specify vulnerability as social or economic, while others focus more on natural

disastersandpronenessofthecommunitytothese.Inthisstudyvulnerabilityisdefinedasa

generalconditionofbeingexposedtopotentiallyharmfuleventsandorexposuretorisksthat

canhaveanimpactonfuturewelfare,suchasforexampletheriskofremainingorbecoming

poor.Poor isgenerallyreferredtoawell-defined lowlevelofconsumptionof foodandnon-

food goods aswell as limited access to services. Various external aswell as internal factors

influencethevulnerabilityofahousehold.External factorsaretheavailabilityofeducational

andhealthfacilitiesforexample,whileinternalfactorsarereferredtoafamilyorhousehold’s

capacityofcopingwithexposurestorisksandharmfuleventsanditscapacitytogeneratean

incomethatissufficienttosustainallofitsdependentmembers.

Those particularly vulnerable are generally those who are in some way or another

disadvantagedinaccessingresourcesandbenefits.

The International banks guidelines define vulnerable groups as is outlined in the following

table.

Table4-1 DefinitionofVulnerabilitybyInternationalBanks

IFCPS1.12 Thisdisadvantagedorvulnerablestatusmaystemfromanindividual’sor

group’srace,color,sex,language,religion,politicalorotheropinion,

nationalorsocialorigin,property,birth,orotherstatus.Theclient

shouldalsoconsiderfactorssuchasgender,age,ethnicity,culture,

literacy,sickness,physicalormentaldisability,povertyoreconomic

disadvantage,anddependenceonuniquenaturalresources.

IFCHandbookfor

Resettlement

Peoplewhobyvirtueofgender,ethnicity,age,physicalormental

disability,economicdisadvantage,orsocialstatusmaybemore

adverselyaffectedbyresettlementthanothersandwhomaybelimited

intheirabilitytoclaimortakeadvantageofresettlementassistanceand

relateddevelopmentbenefits.

ADBInvoluntary

Resettlement

Sourcebook

Especiallythosebelowthepovertyline,thelandless,theelderly,women

andchildren,andIndigenousPeoples,andthosewithoutlegaltitleto

land

ADB

Environmental

VulnerableGroups,includingthepoor,women,children,indigenousand

tribalpeople,ethnicminorities,illegalsettlersandsquatters,disabled


assessment

guidelines2003

people,newandoldimmigrants,whoseconditionmaybemadeworse

byapolicyreform,anewprogram,orsomeformofprojectintervention,

andforwhomsocialsafetynetsandcompensationmechanismshaveto

beprovidedsothattheyarenotadverselyaffectedbysuchchanges

4.1.2 IndonesianGovernmentPovertyindicators

Badan Pusat Statistik, The Indonesian Statistics Department (BPS) uses in general two

indicators to determine the poverty or welfare status of the various regions in Indonesia,

whicharetheHumanDevelopmentIndexandthepovertyline(gariskemiskinan).

4.1.2.1 HumanDevelopmentIndex

TheHumanDevelopmentIndex(HDI)isacompositestatisticoflifeexpectancy,education,and

per capita income indicators,whichmeasures the achievement of human development and

thequalityoflife.TheHDIiscomposedofthreedimensions,health,knowledgeandwelfare.It

isusedtorankcountriesintofourtiersofhumandevelopment.Indonesiahasrecentlybegan

calculating and recording the HDI on the regional level. Level of achievement is shown in

percentagewhere100%isequivalenttothehighestachievement.

CurrentdataavailableonBPSshowsthattheHDIforSolokSelatancomparedtothatofWest

Sumatra and Indonesia overall is considerably lower. Most likely limited access to public

infrastructuresuchasenergysupply,roads,healthandeducationalfacilitiesandpoorhuman

resourcescapacitycontributetoalowerlevelHDIindexinSolokSelatanregency.

Figure4-1 HumanDevelopmentIndexcompared(BPSSumatraBarat

andIndonesia),2017

4.1.2.2 Povertyline

ThePovertyLine(GK)isthesumoftheFoodPovertyLineandtheNon-FoodPovertyLine.The

population with average per capita expenditure per month under the Poverty Line is

categorizedaspoor.TheFoodPovertyLinerepresentstheminimumfoodexpenditureneeds

equivalentto2100kilocaloriesperday.Thebasicfoodcommoditypackageisrepresentedby


52 typesof commodities (grains, tubers, fish,meat,eggsandmilk, vegetables,beans, fruits,

oils and fats, etc.). The Non-Food Poverty Line is the minimum requirement for housing,

clothing,educationandhealth.Thebasicfoodnon-foodcommoditypackageisrepresentedby

51 urban commodities and 47 rural commodities. Themain data sources used areNational

Socio-EconomicSurvey(Susenas)PanelofConsumptionandCorrectionModules.

ThepovertylineforSolokSelatanRegencyfor2015isRp.292,292permonthwhichisalmost

Rp. 100,000 lower than that of the Province while around Rp. 40,000 lower than the rural

averageacrossIndonesia(Table4-2).

Table4-2 PovertyLine

RegionPovertyLine2015

(IDR/month)

PovertyLine2016

(IDR/month)

SolokSelatanRegency 292,292 n.a.

SumateraBaratProvince 384,277 425,520(Rural)

IndonesiaAverage 333,034 350,420(Rural)

Source:BPSIndonesiaandSumateraBarat,2017

TheISDPstudyreportfrom2015definedthepovertylineatRp.291,000permonth.

4.2 Scoping

Scopingstudywasconductedon26-30December2016toidentifyrespondentsofSESVAstudy

andtheiraddresses.Therespondentswereselectedfromthelistoflandownerswhoselands

have been compensated by SEML excluding those that previously have been surveyed by

SEML.

Ofthe202householdsitwasdeterminedthatonly127householdswouldbeincludedinthe

survey,since75hadbeenstudiedaspartoftheISDPstudyin2015.Thestudyatthetimeonly

focused on the affected households in Ring 1. The present study therefore covered the

remainder.

Before the scoping trip, the lists thatwereavailablehad tobeconsolidated,as someof the

households were listed twice or more because they have more than one parcel of land

acquiredbySEML.

Outof127respondentsinitiallytargetedforSESVAstudy,approximately70participantswere

identifiedduringthescopingvisitincludingcoordinatorswhowillhelpcontactingrespondents

duringsurvey.Thecoordinatesofthe70respondents’addresswererecordedbyGPSforeasy

access by enumerators during survey. Other details such as villages, sub-villages or jorong,

contact numbers, time of availability, were also recorded. The respondents live mainly in

several Nagari in Pauh Duo Sub-District, i.e. Nagari Alam Pauh Duo, Nagari Pauh Duo Nan

Batigo,NagariKapauAlamPauhDuo,andNagariLuakKapauAlamPauhDuo.


Figure4-2 MapofproposedsurveyedprojectaffectedlandownersforSESVAstudy


Some landowners or cultivatorswere no longer available for the survey due to either pass

awayorhe/shehasmovedtootherplacesfarfromMuaraLabohortheProjectarea.

Table4-3 Landownerswhonolongeravailableforsurvey

No Name Remark

1 Yuhardiman Deceased

2 Basraini Deceased

3 FemiRianto Moved

4 GuHendri Moved

5 Anasril Deceased

6 Arpendi Moved

ThescopingactivitywascloselyassistedbySEMLfieldrelationsofficer,MuhammadRoza,who

hastheinformationoftheaddressandlocationoflandowners.

Afterreturningfromthesite,scopingcontinued.Eventually,thenumberofhouseholdstobe

surveyedwasincreasedto133inordertoincludemembersofthefarmergroupsorKelompok

TaniwhoselandwasacquiredbySEMLnotonanindividualbasisbutasagroup.

4.3 Socio-EconomicSurveyandVulnerabilityAssessment(Questionnaire)

Thesocio-economicsurveyandvulnerabilityassessment(SESVA)wascarriedoutbycollecting

datafrom133householdswithoneortworespondentsperhouseholdtoanswerquestions.

The respondents of the SESVA survey is based on the result of Scoping activity and other

additional names of land owners identified and examined by SEML andGreencap. Any land

owners that have been interviewed in the previous study were not included in the list.

DetailedofSESVA listof respondents ispresented intheAppendix I.Thesurveywascarried

outbyGreencapandlocalUniversity,UniversitasAndalas.

The survey team consisted of enumerators and supervisors. The analysis of the data was

backed up by an SPSS analyist/statistician. The enumerators were briefed about the

questionnaires by Supervisor from Universitas Andalas, DR. Alfan Miko, and by Greencap,

MuhammadZaki.

Everymorninganevaluationmeetingwasconductedwithenumeratorsandfieldsupervisorto

spotanychallengesanddifficultiesfacedbyenumeratorsinthefieldaswellasdifficultieswith

feedbacksinthequestionnaire.Thedatainputofthefilledupquestionnaireswascarriedout

bySPSSspecialistfromUniversitasAndalas.

Table4-4 ResourcePersonsforSESVASurvey

Resource Pax

Supervisor 2

Enumerators 5

SPSSanalyst 1


Questionnaires developed for household survey consisted of open and closed questions

(SESVAQuestionnairesisattachedinAppendixII).Ingeneral,thequestionsaredividedinto5

topicsasfollows.

1. Demography: to identify family structureandother familymemberswho live inother

places.

2. Household Economy: to find out occupation of family members; assets; income and

expenditure;vulnerability.

3. LandAcquisitionbySEML;toevaluaterespondents’perceptiononlandacquisitionand

price.

4. The existence of SEML: job opportunity with SEML; CSR; Community Committee and

GrievanceMechanism.

5. Closing:respondents’feedback/expectationtoSEML.

Ineachhouseholdtworespondentswereapproachedtoanswerthequestionnaire.Thiswas

done to increase accuracy of data received as knowledge about income, income generation

activities and expenses is often partial, for instance women tend to knowmore about the

expenseswhilemenmayknowmoreaboutthelandtheycultivateandrelatedexpensesand

income.

Dependingonthetimeoftheday,andavailabilityofhouseholdmembers,notallofthetwo

respondentswereheadofhouseholdandwife.

4.4 FocusGroupDiscussion(FGD)

Focus Group Discussion (FGD) were used to explore the understanding of current capacity

building programs, issues with current program implementation and to identify needs and

expectationofprojectaffected landowners.Greencapalsocooperatedwith localuniversity,

Universitas Andalas, to facilitate the FGDs. The FGD was undertaken through the following

processes.

FGD is aimed to identify livelihood and skill development opportunities with the affected

persons,whichincludes,butnotlimitedto:

1. Labor skills: automotive training, computer operator/administration/accounting,

construction,driverandheavyequipmentoperator,wielder,chef,tailor,security;

2. Local business skills: laundry and cleaning services, catering, canteen, car rental,

equipmentrentalsandtailorservices;

3. Fruitplantationmanagement; access to financial support forprocurementof tractors,

and agricultural implements, training on processing and marketing of agricultural

products,financialliteracytraining.


4.4.1 SelectionProcessofVulnerableGrouptobeincludedinFGDs

Theresultofthesurveywasanalysedintermsofsocio-economicconditionsandanumberof

respondents were selected to be participants for FGDs. The selection is based on the

considerationforvulnerability,whichisbasedonthefollowingcriteria:

1. Womanheadedfamily:womansingleparentwhoiseconomicallyweaktosupporther

family.

2. Lowincome:thatistherespondentswhohavelowhouseholdincomebylookingattheir

monthlygrossincomedividedbynumberoffamilymembers.

3. Debt pressure versus income: In addition, debts versus income also become the

considerationforvulnerabilitywheresomerespondentsshowtheamountofdebtthey

havetopayisalmostequaltoincomeandthosepeoplewhoareindebttocoverfamily

dailyneeds.

4. Lowlevelofeducation:manyoftherespondentseitherdidnotcompleteorcompleted

onlyprimaryschoolandtheydidnotcontinuetheirstudiestoahighereducation.

5. Unemployed: the productive age people especially the youth who have completed

primary, junior and high school, as well as higher education, but they do not work

and/orarenotemployed.

6. Noskill:Onlysmallnumbersofrespondentswhohaveskilllikesewingandembroidery

and furniture expertise. The rest have either none or limited skills that made them

vulnerableandunabletoimprovetheireconomiccondition.

Otherfactorusedtoscreenvulnerablegroup is throughhouseconditionsuchaswhetheror

nottherespondenthavepoorconditionofhouses;foodsecuritysuchaswhetherornotthey

haveeversufferedfromfamineorfoodshortage;healthconditionsuchasdiseasesthatmake

respondent unable to work and earn income; and natural disaster that affect economic

activitiesoftherespondents.

4.4.2 ClassificationofgroupsforFGD

Basedontheabovecriteria,approximately50peoplewereselectedtorepresentthefollowing

vulnerablegroupsforFGDexercises:

1. Womenvulnerablegroup

2. MenVulnerableGroup

3. YouthVulnerableGroup

Besidesvulnerablegroupofpeople,FGDswerealsoorganizedwithanothergroupofpeople

which are used as comparison to the groups of vulnerable people as well as to explore

informationandperceptiontowardtheProject.OneoftheadditionalFGDswasorganizedby

GreencapandtheothertwowereorganizeddirectlybySEMLasseenbelow:

1. WomenleaderandBundoKanduanginthelandacquisitionaffectedarea.

2. YouthLeader(organizedbySEML)


3. CustomaryLeader(organizedbySEML)

PleasenotethatonlytheresultsoftheadditionalwomenleaderandBundoKanduangFGDis

includedinthediscussionandresultsinthisreport.

4.4.3 TheimplementationofFGD

TheFGDwasorganizedinWismaGemini,about5kmfromMuaraLabohmarketand12kmto

SEMLproject site. The location is relatively central toall FGDparticipantswhomostly come

from3Nagariandthetimeforinterviewwassetintheafternoonfortwosessionstomakeit

easy for participants to attend the FGDs. The first session is from 13.00 to 15.00 and the

secondsessionisfrom16.00to18.00.

ThenumberofparticipantswhoattendedtheFGDsis43participants(outofapproximately50

participantsinvited)consistsofmengroup8people,womengroup11people,youthgroup13

people,andBundoKanduang/womenleadergroup11peopleasshowninthetablebelow.

Table4-5 ListofMenFGDParticipants

No Name

NoofProject

AffectedHousehold

(SESVA)*

Relationtohousehold

(familyhead)Remark

1 CandraDarma 39 HeadofHousehold -

2 Yusra 43 HeadofHousehold -

3 Hendra 138 HeadofHousehold -

4 ZainalDtTalanan 114 HeadofHousehold -

5 SyamSyahril 137 HeadofHousehold -

6 Nasrul 86 HeadofHousehold Thereare2people

namedNasrul(S),theone

invitedandjoiningthe

FGDisNasrulfromPinang

Sinawa

7 MuhammadYulis 89 HeadofHousehold -

8 Dasril 141 HeadofHousehold -

*NumberofParticipantsasinAttachmentIa.ListofProjectAffectedHouseholds

Table4-6 ListofWomenFGDParticipants

No WomenGroupNoofProjectAffected

Household(SESVA)*

Relationto

household(family

head)

Remark

1 DaniRumantika 83 Wife -

2 NetriYenti 3 Wife -

3 Nurleli 118 Wife -

4 Isas 85 Wife -

5 Nurimis 114 Wife -

6 Yuli 50 Wife -


No WomenGroupNoofProjectAffected

Household(SESVA)*

Relationto

household(family

head)

Remark

7 Rosnawati 103 Wife -

8 SusYunita 89 Daughter Sherepresentedher

mother,Nurjuliswho

couldnotattendthe

FGD

9 SusiSusanti 103 Daughter Accompanyingher

motherandparticipated

intheFGD

10 Ernita 134 Wife ErnitaisLandOwner,

WifeToArdi

11 Pasriati 118 Daughter Sherepresentedher

mother,Nurleli(Nurlaili)


Table4-7 ListofYouthFGDParticipants

No YouthGroupNoofProjectAffected

Household(SESVA)*

Relationto

household(family

head)

Remark

1 YoseSaputra 134 Son -

2 HendraEkaPutra 63 Son -

3 EdoJatiJaya 100 Son HisLandwasAcquiredBy

Seml

4 ErsisWirmansyah 96 Son HisLandwasAcquiredBy

Seml

5 ZulfahRoni^ - Son Memberof landcultivators

inMudiakLolo

6 Ijan 114 Son His father is Zainal (Dt

Talanan)

7 RigaSaputra 13 Son -

8 DindaRatulasmi 3 Daughter DaughterofAldiZamri

9 Mulhandri 72 InLaw Mulhandri isbrotherin law

ofAfdal,sonofNurjani/Aris

Afrianto

10 Ardison 40 Headof

household

-

11 IndraPutra 40 Nephew NephewtoArdison

12 RandaUsmanto^ - Son MemberofLandCultivator,

unemployed

13 Hasnatullah

Khairiah

3 Niece NiecetoAldiZamri



^ZulfahRoniandRandaUsmantoweremembersofFarmersGroup/landcultivators

Table4-8 ListofBundoKanduang/WomenLeaderFGDParticipants

No

Bundo

Kanduang/Women

LeaderGroup

Position

1 WiraYulita RepresentativefromJorongBlokNol,Pekonina

2 ErmaNeti RepresentativefromJorongKampungBaru,

Pekonina

3 YusneliM BundoKanduang

4 SalmawatiSalta HeadofBundoKanduang

5 Rusdanelly HeadofPKKTeam,NagariPauhDuoNanBatigo

6 Hj.Agustina BundoKanduang,HeadofMajlisTa’lim,PauhDuo

Sub-District

7 YosiAfrianita HeadofPKKTeam,NagariLuakKapau

8 Yurmailis HeadofPKKTeam,NagariKapauAlamPauhDuo

9 WilnaGuspawati HeadofPKKTeam,AlamPauhDuo

10 WiraSantika RepresentativefromJorongTaratakTinggi,Pekonina

11 GusmaYeti RepresentativefromJorongTaratakTinggi,Pekonina

The FGDwas carried out by 1 facilitator, 1 co-facilitator, and 1 note taker and attended by

representatives from SEML to inform SEML Project update as well as to disseminate the

Project’sGrievanceMechanismcontactnumber.

To explore information from the participants, the facilitator usedmetaplan papers and the

participantsweregivenopportunitiestodiscussandexpresstheiropinion.Facilitatorassisted

theprocessofbrainstorminganddiscussionwhiletheco-facilitatortookimportantpointsona

flipchartpaperinfrontoftheparticipants.FortheBundoKanduang/Womenleadergroup,the

FGDsettingwaschangedslightlybyaddingasessionwheretheparticipantsweregroupedinto

three and then they were asked to discuss about women role in economy in the nagari,

load/burdenandresponsibilityofwomen,andwomenroleinthepublicsector.Theresultsof

thediscussionwerepresentedtoallparticipantsintheFGDofwomenleaders.

ThediscussionwascarriedoutinIndonesianlanguageaswellasMinanglanguage.Theuseof

localorethnic language isnotan issuebecause theFGD facilitator isoriginallyMinangwho

speaks the language fluently and understand the context and meanings of the statements

expressedbyFGDparticipants.

Itisobservedthatthelevelsofattendance,participationandinsight,variedfromonegroupto

another.MenGroup has sufficient number of attendance for FGDs of 8 peoplewhile other

groupshavemorethan10people.TheparticipationofYouthGroup intheFGDdiscussion is

lowercompared toothergroups,whichmightbebecauseof low levelof confidenceamong


theyouthtoexpresstheiropinionandnotusedtohavingdiscussionsuchasFGD.Thelevelof

insight also shows that the youth group demonstrates low level of insight while men and

womengrouphaveamediumlevelofinsightsandtheBundoKanduang/womenleadergroup

hashighlevelofinsight.ThiscanbeseenduringthediscussionintheYouthGroupwherethe

opinion,information,andideasexpressedweremainlyaroundtheactivitiesthattheyaredaily

involved in. It is commonthatyouthwhodonot further their studiesafterprimaryschools

will stay in the village and work as farmers. The highest level of insight is in the Bundo

Kanduang/women leader Group where all participants actively express their opinion about

families, women roles, the system in the society, and the information about development

programsintheirareas.

Table4-9 Attendance,participationandinsightofFGDparticipants

Groups Attendance Participation Insight

MenGroup Sufficient VeryActive Medium

WomenGroup High Veryactive Medium

YouthGroup High Medium Low

Bundo

Kanduang/Women

LeaderGroup

High VeryActive High

4.5 KeyInformantInterview(KII)

In addition to the FGD, a semi structured interviews were carried out with several key

stakeholders in the local government and educational institution. The points of discussion

were about community development programs implemented by government to improve

communityskillandlivelihood,challengesandlimitation,aswellasfutureplanofcommunity

development program in the regency and especially in the area adjacent to the Project site

andlandacquisitionaffectedcommunities.

Thelistofinterviewedkeystakeholderisasinthetablebelow:

No Name Office PositionDay/Dateof

Interview

1 DR. Syamsulrizaldi,

S.IP,SE,MM

RegionalPlanningandDevelopment

AgencyorBadanPerencanaan

PembangunanDaerah(BAPPEDA)of

SolokSelatanRegency

Head Wednesday,15

March2017

2 Hafison Social,Workforce,andTransmigration

AgencyorDinasSosial,TenagaKerja

danTransmigrasi(Dinsosnakertrans)

andVocationalTrainingCenteror

BalaiLatihanKerja(BLK)

Head Wednesday,15

March2017

3 WindraNardi Social,Workforce,andTransmigration

AgencyorDinasSosial,TenagaKerja

danTransmigrasi(Dinsosnakertrans)

SectionHeadof

WorkforceTraining

Wednesday,15

March2017

4 Zulkarnain EducationAgencyorDinasPendidikan Head Friday,17March


No Name Office PositionDay/Dateof

Interview

2017

5 Novrizon EducationAgencyorDinasPendidikan

FormerHeadofVocationalHigh

SchoolorSekolahMenengah

Kejuruan(SMK)I

SectionHead Friday,17March

2017

6 Efrizal VocationalHighSchoolorSekolah

MenengahKejuruan(SMK)ISolok

Selatan

ActingHead Friday,17March

2017

4.6 ChallengesandLimitations

The study encountered a number of challenges, difficulties and limitation during the

implementationasfollows.

4.6.1 Scopingstudy

1. DifficultyindeterminingnamesoflandownerstobeincludedintheSESVAstudy.Some

landownershavenotonlyoneparceloflandbutanumberofparcelsoflandacquired

bySEML.

2. Thelocationofparticipantsisscatteredinanumberofjorongsinawiderangearea.

3. Not all of the households could be identified during the scoping study due to time

constraint,butcontactpersonswere identifiedwhoknewtheaddressesofother land

acquisitionimpactedhouseholds.

4.6.2 Householdsurveyforsocio-economicandvulnerabilityassessment

1. To find the location of new identified respondents who were not identified during

scopingactivitywasdifficultbecauseofthedistanceandlocation.

2. Negative/unwelcome response from respondents who were not happy or who felt

disadvantagedwiththeProjectandlandacquisitionprocess.

3. Nicknameversusofficialname; respondentsareknown to the communitieswith their

nicknamesratherthatofficialnamesaswritteninthelist.

4.6.3 FGDandKII

1. The location of FGD participants spreads in several sub-villages aroundMuara Laboh,

Projectsiteareaandinthecapitalcityoftheregency,PadangAro.

2. Change of status of survey respondents; dynamic progress and changes of status of

respondentsduringandafterthesurveyforinstanceunemployment.Somerespondents

wereunemployedduring thesurvey,but inapproximatelyone-month time theygeta

job.


4.6.4 Questionnaireandanalysis

Notalloftheenumeratorsfilledintheanswersastheywererequested. Inparticular,where

we asked for more details this was not filled in. Enumerators had been trained at the

beginningandweresupervised.

Enumerators faced difficulties and spent a lot of time in getting the answer on assets,

especially on land ownership. Some of the respondents knew only howmuch money they

werecompensatedwith,butnotthewidthofcultivatedlandacquiredbySEML.

Duringdataentrythereweresomemistakesoccurringduetotheamountofdatatobeadded.

Someof these errors havebeen identified and addressedduring the analysis.However, the

cleaningupofthedatahasledtodelaysintheanalysis.


5 SOCIO-ECONOMICPROFILE

5.1 Demographics

Therewere133householdssurveyedinatotalof26differentjorongin3differentnagarinear

SEML’sprojectlocation.Thebulkofthehouseholds(ornearlyhalf)liveinthefourJorongsof

TaratakBukareh,PinangSinawa,TaratakTinggi,andKampungBaru.

Figure5-1 Domicileofthe133surveyedhouseholds

Themajorityof the respondents identifiedasethnicMinang,3%asMelayu,3%as Javanese

and1%asothers.Inactualfact,theMelayuthemselvesareasubgroupofMinang(Figure5-2).

Figure5-2 Ethnicbackgroundofsurveyedhouseholds

Those other ethnic groups are only represented in 8 of the 26 jorongs.Most Javanese are

found to be living in Pekonina (100%) and in Pasar Muara Laboh around 50% of the total

households surveyed. The Javanese who settled in Pekonina have come here around one


hundredyearsagowhentheywerehiredtoworkintheteaplantationestate,whilethearrival

oftheJavaneseinPasarMuaraLabohisnotclear,butassumedtobeduringtheDutchcolonial

time.PasarMuaraLabohisanoldDutchtown.

In8ofthevillagestherewereotherethnicgroupspartofthehouseholdssurveyed,whilein

theremaining19villagesallwereMinang.

Figure5-3 JorongswithethnicgroupsotherthanMinaninsurveyedhouseholds

The figures on the ethnic distribution show that themajority of the surveyedhouseholds is

Minang. Other ethnic groups who were affected by land acquisition make up a larger

percentage of all affected households are present in all villages. In Pekonina 100% of the

affectedhouseholdsare Javanese,while inPasarMuaraLaboh, theymakeup50%. InPakan

SelasaandothervillagesalsosomeaffectedhouseholdsidentifiedasMelayuandotherethnic

groups.

Figure5-4 Ageandgenderofrespondents1and2.

Most people interviewedwere in the age brackets of 40 to 60 years old, women andmen

acrossthevillages.


Figure5-5 Self-assessedHealthstatus

Almostallof the interviewed respondents feelhealthyandonlyvery few indicated they felt

unwell.

5.2 Families,familycomposition,agestructureandgender

Figure5-6 Agestructureofsurveyedhouseholds

Thepopulationpyramidshowsarelativelyagedpopulationoftheaffectedhouseholdsandnot

manyveryyoung(0-4)atthispointintimecomparedtotheotheragebrackets.


Table5-1 DependencyandGenderRatio

AgeGroup Male Female Total Indonesia

Young(0-14) 83 86 169

Senior(65+) 13 4 17

Totaldependent 96 90 186

WorkingAge(15-64) 205 225 430

Total 301 315 616

DependencyRatio 47% 40% 43% 51%

GenderRatio 105 100

The dependency ratio which is the ratio of the young and senior over the working age

population,ortheaffectedhouseholdmembersisbelow50%whichislowcomparedtoother

regionsinIndonesiaandtheIndonesianaverageofaround49%.DependencyRatiomeasures

the pressure on productive population (15-65 of age) by economically inactive population

sections(childrenandoldage).

Figure5-7 Householdstructure–householdmembers

Mostfamilieshave4or5membersoreven6or7members.Themaximumrecordedwas8.A

family usually consists of husband and wife head of household, children and other family

members.


Figure5-8 HouseholdMembers

HouseholdMembers Number Indonesia

Mean 4.6 3.9

Median 5

Min 1

Max 8

Figure5-9 Theagerangeofthedifferentfamilymembers


Theage rangeof thedifferent familymembers shown in the figuresaboveshows thatmost

parentsrangebetween25to55whilechildren’sagebetween0and30to35.

Italso shows that in some families thechildren livewith theparentsandalreadyhave their

ownchildren.

5.3 SkillsandLivelihood

5.3.1 OccupationsofHouseholdMembers

Householdswereaskedabout the typeof themain, secondary andotheroccupationsof its

members and the frequency of these economic activities pursued. In Indonesia, most

householdspursueavarietyofeconomicactivities,forinstancewhileafarmermaybemainly

occupiedwithmanagingthecrops,hemayatthesameworkonanoccasionalbasisasaday

labourer,andhiswifemaybetendingtothecattleandhaveashop,andayoungermemberof

thefamilymayhavealreadystartedemploymentatalocalmotorbikeworkshopandsoon.

In this study,most household heads indicated their primary occupation to be irrigated rice

farmer, or 56%. The remaining 44% of the household heads pursued a variety of different

occupations.Forthewives,themainoccupationswereother(36%),followedbygovernment

employee(26%)andricefarmer(25%)whileothermembers’mainoccupationindicatedwere

rice farmer or other (Figure 5-10, Figure 5-11, Figure 5-12). It turns out that multiple

occupationsoreconomicactivitiesarenot thatmuchofanorm in thesehouseholds.Of the

126householdheadsonlyaroundaquarteror32havea secondoccupation,with themain

secondaryoccupations in farmingmainly.For thewives, itwas fourwho indicated that they

wereworkinganotherjobbesidestheirmainoccupation,whichwaseitherfarming,tradingor

other.

(a)N=126

(b)N=32

Figure5-10 Main(a)andSecondary(b)OccupationofHouseholdHead


(a)N=73

(b)N=4

Figure5-11Main(a)andSecondary(b)OccupationsofWife

Figure5-12 Otherhouseholdmembersmaineconomicactivity,N=16

5.3.2 PerceivedAdultLiteracy

Respondentswereaskedabouttheliteracyabilityoftheirhouseholdmembers, iftheycould

read,haddifficulties, couldn’tatallor if theywouldnotknow.The resultsaccording toage

groupsoftheworkingagepopulationshowsthatinmostagebracketsbothmaleandfemale

can read and only in the older age brackets there are some, in particularwomen,who are

perceivedashavingliteracydifficultiesorareilliterate.


Figure5-13 Levelofliteracy

5.3.3 EducationalAttainment

Theeducationalattainmentthehouseholdmembersaged20andoldershowsthatuptothe

ageof 49 inbothmale and femalemore thanhalf have finished seniorhigh school orhave

attained tertiary education. Also across the ages, women seem to be in general better

educated thanmen.On average tertiary ratio is higher forwomen thanmen across all age

groups. In theolder agebracketsmanyhaveonly completedprimary school or not finished

school.

LiteracyrateinIndonesia95.8%,femaleliteracy90.1%andmaleliteracy95.6%

SolokSelatan97.72%,SUMBAR97.38(2013,BPSSUMBAR)

Figure5-14 EducationalAttainmentofAdults,aged20andolder

In termsofeconomicactivities, themajorityof those looking forworkaremenbetween20

and30.Althoughmanywomenarehousekeeperstheyarealsoactiveworking.


Figure5-15 EconomicActivityofsurveyedHouseholds

Table5-2 Laborparticipationrate

LaborParticipationRate Male Female All

Totalworkingagepop 203 220 423

Working 151 89 240

Lookingforwork 9 5 14

Totalactive 160 94 254

Housekeeper 4 67 71

Atschool 33 55 88

Othernoteconomicallyactive 6 4 10

Totalnon-active 43 126 169

LabourParticipationRate(LPR) 79% 43% 60%

TheLPRamountsto79%inmalesand43%infemalesandoverallin60%.

5.4 LandOwnershipandAssets

Land owned by the affected households thatwas leftoverwithin PT SEML contract ofwork

area, landthatwasboughtaftercompensationswerereceivedfromPTSEMLandother land

thatwasownedorsharecroppedhasbeenlistedinbelowtable.

Accordingtothesurvey,therearestill93householdsthathavelandwithinthePTSEMLarea.

Mostofthatlandisidentifiedasladang(84%)andassawah(13%)withatotalsizeofaround

245ha(oranaverage1.84haperhousehold).Thosewhoboughtlandaftertheyhadreceived

compensationare9outof133households.Theyinvestedthatintodryland(ladang)(69%)or


wetland(sawah) (39%)withatotalareaofaround5ha.17of the133households indicated

that theywerealsoowningor sharecroppingother landwitha total areaof8haandagain

aroundtwothirdsareladangandonethirdissawah.

Intermsofownershipstatusandorigin,thelandleftoverwithinPTSEMLwasmostlywithout

papers(50%)orwithanoticeofthevillagehead(30%)and12%hadtheirlandregistered.34%

indicatedtheyhadinheritedthatland,while18%boughtit.Therewere9householdswhosaid

tohavebought landafter compensation,with7of thesehouseholdsdetailing that the land

boughtwasmostlyeitherwithoutpaperorwithadeedofsales/purchaseandonlyone land

parcel bought had a land title. Of the 16 households with other land, 19% had an oral

sharecrop agreement, 6 % had leased that land, and 13% had land with a title, while the

majorityofthehouseholdsindicatedthattheotherlandwaseitherwithavillageheadnotice

or without papers (31% each). In terms of origin of the other land, 38% indicated they

inheritedtheland,while25%boughtit,19%leaseditand19%wasunspecified.

Table5-3 LandAssetsofthe133households,SESVASurvey2017

ItemLandleftover

withinPTSEML

Landboughtafter

PTSEML

Compensation

Otherlandowned

/sharecropped

N= 133 133 133

1land 76 9 15

2lands 16 0 2

3lands 1 0 0

Noland 40 124 116

Totalsize(ha) 244.72 5.25 8.01

Averagesize(ha) 1.84 0.04 0.06

%ladang(dryland) 84% 61% 62%

%sawah(wetrice) 13% 39% 34%

%tambak(aquaculture) 0% 0% 3.1%

%hutan(forest) 0.4% 0.0% 0%

%tanahrumah(residential) 2.7% 0% 0%

OwnershipStatus N=92 N=7 N=16

landtitle 12% 14% 13%

sale/purchasedeed/grant 2% 43% 0%

villageheadnotice 30% 0% 31%

Borrow/Leaseright 2% 0% 6%

withoutpapers 50% 43% 31%

tenantwithwritten

contract 1%

0%

0%

tenantwithoralagreement 2% 0% 19%

Origin N=88 N=7 N=16

inherited 34% 0% 38%

bought 18% 100% 25%

leased 2% 0% 19%

other 45% 0% 19%


Source:SESVASurvey

5.5 IncomeandExpenditure

Household income was calculated based on the information received in the questionnaires

from the different household members from their main and other occupations. Note that

however informationon income isusuallynot thataccurateas it isdifficult tomeasure. For

instance,thosewhofarmdonothaveregularpaidmonthlyincome.Thesamegoesforcasual

daylaborersandshopkeepers.Therangethatwasindicatedbythehouseholdswasbetween

Rp.300,000touptoRp.175millionorifcalculatedpercapitaorperhouseholdmemberfrom

lessthanRp.200,000touptoRp.35million.GiventhattheStandarddeviationisalmostashigh

as the average, the income figure here first of all show there is great variation in what

households earn or perceive to earn but theremay also be not very exact. For this reason,

expenditureisagoodmeasuretobetterunderstandthestatusofhouseholds.

Table5-4 IncomeRangeofSurveyedHouseholds,N=133(inRupiah)

HouseholdIncome PerCapitaIncome

Average 33,903,180 7,412,983

Min 300,000 85,000

Max 175,000,000 35,000,000

StandardDeviation 27,166,316 6,053,362

Householdswereaskedabouttheirdaily,monthlyandregularexpendituresforfood,non-food

and specific occasion expenses. These were then calculated and approximated to monthly

expenditurestobeinlineandcomparablewiththeIndonesianpovertylineclassification.

Unfortunately, the numbers gathered in the field were not checked and calculated to a

monthlybasis.For instance, somehouseholds indicated that theydidnotbuyriceeveryday,

buttheenumeratorsdidnotrecordhowmanytimesricewasboughtwithinonemonth.Thus

someapproximationhadtobeused.Someofthenumbersindicatedlookexorbitantandsome

too small. In any case, this record is momentary. For a more exact representation of

expenditure patterns of PAHH, one would have to do recording of expenditures of a few

householdsovera coupleofweeksorevenmonths.Therefore thenumberspresentedhere

havetobetreatedcarefully.

Comparing thesenumbers to thepoverty line,allof thesurveyedhouseholdsareabove the

povertyline.

Table5-5MonthlyExpenditureRangeofSureveyedHouseholds,N=133(inRupiah)

Monthly FoodExpenditures Non-FoodExpenditures TotalExpenditures

Average 1,709,695 844,734 2,554,429

Min 309,000 115,500 424,500

Max 6,650,000 18,235,000 24,885,000

StandardDeviation 1,436,876 222,182 1,659,058


5.6 LandSoldto/AcquiredbySEML

Households were asksed about the land that was acquired by SEML at the time, what

compensation thathad receivedandwhat theydidwith thecompensationmoney received.

Following tables show the results.1 Accordingly, most land was dry land and only a small

percentage irrigatedricefields,grass landorwoodlots.Noneofthe landsoldtoSEMLwere

houselots.Morethanhalfofthelandwasprivatelyowned,whileaboutathirdwasownedin

partnershipwithothers.Inbothquestions,20%didnotreturnananswer.

Table5-6TypeofLandSoldto/Acquired

bySEML

N=133

DryLand/Garden 96(72%)

IrrigatedRicefield 10(8%)

Meadow/Grassland 2(2%)

WoodLot/Forest 1(1%)

HouseLot 0

Noanswer 24(18%)

Table 5-7 Ownership Status of Land Sold to /

AcquiredbySEML

N=133

OwnLand 67(51%)

OwnedinPartnership 38(29%)

Other 1(1%)

NoAnswer 26(20%)

Table 5-8 Total Area of Land Sold to/

AcquiredbySEML

N=101

Total 146,69ha

Average 1.11ha

Smallest 0.01ha

Largest 8ha

StandardDeviation 1.53ha

Noanswer 31

Table 5-9 Previous Yearly Earnings from Land

Soldto/AcquiredbySEML

N=9

Total IDR52,215,000

Average IDR395,568

Smallest IDR15,000

Largest IDR15,000,000

StandardDeviation IDR1,953,342

Noanswer 123

1 Note that the survey returned a significant number without any answers which indicates the

uptightness of the local community. Another reasons for no answer is also the time that has lapsed

between the time when land was acquired and this survey. And finally, in some cases, those who

participated in the survey were not the same household members who were involved in the land

acquisitionprocess.Therefore,theresultsherehavetobetreatedwithsomecaution.


Total land thatwassaid tohavebeensold toSEMLwas146,69hectareswithanaverageof

1.11hectares,rangingbetween0.01to8hectares.2Only9households indicatedtheiryearly

earningsofthelandsold,withyieldsrangingfromIDR15,000to15millionandanaverageof

nearlyIDR400,000peryear.

Table 5-10 Compensation Received

fromSEML

N=108

Total IDR6,353,564,000

Average IDR47,771,158

Smallest IDR20,000

Largest IDR551,000,000

StandardDeviation IDR90,761,223

Noanswer 25

Table 5-11 Total Area of Land Left After Land

Acquisition and Percentage of Total Sold to /

AcquiredbySEML

N=62

Total 154.61 -

Average 1.16 48.6%

Smallest 0.16 2.0%

Largest 11.00 100.0%

StandardDeviation 2.11 40.2%

Noanswer 71 32

Compensationpayments received fromSEMLranged from IDR20,000tomore than IDR550

million,whilelandremainingafterthelandacquisitionprocessrangedinsizebetween0.16to

11hectares.Percentageofsoldlandwithintheprojectarearangedfrombetween2to100%

withanaverageofnearly49%.

2 Note, total land sold to Supreme was 140 hectares. The total found in the survey is higher, this

inaccuracymaybeduetothedifficultiesmentionedearlierduringthesurvey.


6 COMMUNITYPERCEPTIONOFTHEPROJECT

6.1 Community’sunderstandingofGrievanceMechanism

The project affected people were also surveyed in terms of their understanding of SEML

Grievenacemechanism(GM).Only57(43%)outof133respondentsindicatedthattheyhave

heardoftheCompanyGrievanceMechanism.Majorityoftherespondentsorabout55%are

eithernotheardof,don’tknow,orjustknewaboutGrievanceMechanism.Tworespondents

gavenoanswer.Table6-2 indicates that the informationaboutGM is received fromfriends

(18%),SEML(14%),andvillageapparatus(10%).ThedatasuggeststhatdisseminationofSEML

GMhasnot thoroughly reachedPAPsuchas landacquisitionaffectedpeople.Thismightbe

thecasebecauserespondentsofthisstudyliveconsiderablyfarfromtheProjectsiteorthat

mediumofGMdisseminationdidnotreachtheareaoftherespondents.

Table6-1 Respondentsawareness(heard)ofSEMLGrievanceMechanism

N=133

Heardof 57(43%)

Notheardof 26(20%)

Don’tknow 44(33%)

Justknownow 4(3%)

Noanswer 2(1%)

Table6-2 ThesourceofinformationaboutGrievanceMechanism

N=133

Familymembers 5(4%)

Friends 24(18%)

VillageApparatus 13(10%)

SEML 18(14%)

Media 2(2%)

Other 1(1%)

Noanswer 70(53%)

In termsof lodginggrievances,majorityof respondents (56%)outof133 indicatedthatthey

facenodifficultiesinlodginggrievances.Meanwhile,29respondents(22%)implieddifficultyin

lodginggrievancesand35respondents(26)didnotgiveanswertothequestion.


Table6-3 DifficultiesinlodgingGrievances

N=133

Yes 29(22%)

No 69(52%)

Noanswer 35(26%)

Inregardstorespondents’awarenessofgrievancesaddressedtoSEML,50respondents(37%)

answeredthattheyareawareofgrivances,21(16%)respondentanswerednotawareofthe

grievances,and62respondents (47%)gavenoanswerontheawarenessofgrievance (Table

6-4). Out of 44 respondents who responded on issues or types of grivances lodged by

communities,25respondents (57%) indicatedthe issueof irrigationwaterproblem(clogging

ofcanals,dryingupricefields),followedbylandacquisitionandcompensationindicatedby13

respondents (30%), employment opportunities (7%), and lastly both land compensation and

irrigationwaterproblems(4%)andprojectnegativeimpacts(2%)(Table6-5).Theresponses

fromrespondentarerelevantwiththestagesofSEMLprojectwhichhavepassedthroughpre-

constructionphasewhereissuesofprojectnegativeimpactsareverylowandotherissueslike

landacquisitioncompensationandemploymentopportunitieshigh.

Table6-4 AwarenessofgrievancestowardSEMLinthecommmunity

N=133

Yes 50(37%)

No 21(16%)

Noanswer 62(47%)

Table6-5 TypesofgrievancesaddressedtoSEML

N=44

Irrigationwaterproblems(cloggingofcanals,dryingupricefields) 25(57%)

Landacquisitionandcompensation 13(30%)

Employmentopportunities 3(7%)

Bothlandacquisitionandcompensationaswellasirrigationwaterproblems 2(4%)

Projectnegativeimpacts 1(2%)

Out of 131 respondents who provided answers to SEML responses toward grievances, 34

respondents (26%) indicated that SEML straight away responded to the grievances and 25

respondents(19%)impliedthegrievancedirectlyresolved.15%ofrespondentsperceivedthat

SEMLneededlongtimetorespondtogrievancesand7%ofrespondentsperceivedthatissues

orgrievanceshavenotbeenresolvedbySEML(Table6-6).Intermsoftheperceivedquickness

in responding grievances, 56 respondents out of 132 or 42% indicated that SEML response

quitefast,2%suggestedveryfast.25respondentsor19%perceivedtheresponsequiteslow


and 5% very slow. Both questions were not answered by 34 % and 33 % respondents

respectively.

Table 6-6 Perceived SEML responses toward

grievances

N=131

Straightawayresponded 34(26%)

Straightawayresolved 25(19%)

Neededalongtime 19(15%)

Hasnotbeenresolved 9(7%)

Noanswer 44(34%)

Table6-7Perceived responsivenessof SEML

towardgrievances(quickness)

N=132

Veryfast 2(2%)

Quitefast 56(42%)

Quiteslow 25(19%)

Veryslow 6(5%)

Noanswer 43(33%)

48respondentsoutof133indicatedthattheyknowwhotocontacttoconveytheirgrievances

orabout36%oftotalrespondentsand33%impliedtheydidnotknowwhotocontact.41%or

41respondentsdidnotanswertothequestion(Table6-8).Intermofwhotoreportto,outof

20 respondents, 12 (60%) people reported to Mr. Muhammad Roza, SEML Assistant Field

Relations Officer, 6 respondents (30%) reported to Mr. Datuk or Bujang Joan, SEML Field

Relations Officer, and finally, 2 persons (10%) answered reporting toWali Nagari (Head of

Village).

Table 6-8 Do they knowwho to contact

forgrievances?

N=133

Yes 48(36%)

No 44(33%)

Noanswer 41(31%)

Table6-9Whotoreportto?

N=20

MuhammadRoza,

SEMLAssistantField

RelationsOfficer

12(60%)

BujangJoanDt.

Panyalai,SEMLField

RelationsOfficer

6(30%)

Wali(villagehead) 2(10%)

TheresponsesfromPAPrespondentshowedthatSEMLrepresentativesaremorewell-known

tothepeoplethanthirdpartyappointedbySEMLforGMcontact.

6.2 Community’ssatisfactionwiththelandacquisitionprocess

Of 132 households, 5 (4%) abstained, 12 (9%) thought the compensation was above

expectations,82(62%)foundthecompensationtobeatthemarketprice,11(8%)foundittoo

lowbutstillaccepteditwhile22(17%)feltitwastoolowbuttheydidnothaveanotherchoice


(“terpaksaditerima”)3.Overall77%werehappywiththelandacquisitionprocessandfoundit

tobefair,while18%werenotsatisfied.Aroundthesamesharesfoundthe informationthat

wasgivenatthetimesufficient.Around69%woulddoitagainiftheyweretoreturntothat

time, while 18%would not. 58% felt that compensation had a positive effect on their life,

while8%thoughtitdidnotand8%thoughtitdidnotchangeathing.Aquarteror26%didnot

answerthisquestion.Ofthe72householdswholeftareason,saidthecompensationwasused

to build or renovate a house, help with school fees, or for daily needs or the household

economy.

6.3 Community’sunderstandingofCurrentSEMLCSRProgram

In terms of PAP participation and occupation with SEML, out of 131, only 7 persons (5%)

answeredtheyhaveworkedforSEMLorSEML’scontractors/suppliers,45respondents(34%)

indicated that they have not worked for SEML or its contractors/suppliers, the rest of the

respondentseitherdidnotknoworgavenoanswer.

Table6-10 Have you everworked or areworking for SEML or

contractors/suppliers?

N=131

WorkingforSEML 0

HaveworkedforSEML 7(5%)

NeverworkedforSEML 45(34%)

Don’tknow 6(5%)

Noanswer 73(56%)

63 respondents or 47% out of 133 respondents indicated that they are aware of SEML

CSR/ISDPProgram.MostoftheCSR/ISDPactivitiesbySEMLtheyknowofhavebeendelivered

in2013or2014eithertotheirneighbours,thejorong,orthemosque,informofascholarship,

seedlingsassistance,andfundingforthemosque.35respondentsor26%answeredhavenot

heardoftheCompany’sCSR/ISDPprogram.Therestofrespondentsansweredeither,donot

know23%,justknownow2%,andgavenoanswer2%(Table6-11).

Table6-11 Awareness(Heard)ofSEMLCSR/ISDP

N=133

Heard 63(47%)

Havenotheardyet 35(26%)

Don’tknow 31(23%)

Justknownow 2(2%)

Noanswer 2(2%)

3SEMLhasstatedinalllandacquisitionprocessthatitisbasedon‘willingbuyerwillingseller’.


When asked about their participation and whether or not they have been beneficiaries to

SEMLCSR/ISDP,29(22%)respondentsoutof131respondedthattheyhaveparticipatedinthe

Company’s CSR/ISDP. Those who have not yet received SEML CSR/ISDP is as many as 60

respondents(45%)andtherestrespondedwithdonotknowabouttheprogram(32%),orjust

knownow(1%).

Table6-12 ParticipatedorbeneficiariesofSEMLCSR/ISDP

N=131

Yes,have 29(22%)

Notyet 60(45%)

Don’tknow 42(32%)

Justknownow 2(1%)

Noanswer 0

The perception of the PAP toward SEML CSR/ISDP implementation varied, 29 respondents

(22%)outof133, indicatedthattheyweresatisfiedwiththeCSR/ISDPprogram.Noneofthe

respondentsansweredthattheywerenotsatisfiedwiththeprogram.Therestofrespondents

eitherindicateddonotknow(41%)orgavenoanswer(37%).

Table6-13 PerceptionaboutSEMLCSR/ISDP

N=133

Satisfied 29(22%)

Notsatisfied 0

Don’tknow 55(41%)

Noanswer 49(37%)

The involvementofPAPscoped in this study is considered lowasper theTable6-13 above,

thisprobablybecauseof the focusofpreviousSEMLCSR/ISDPhavenot reachedtheareaor

thesegroupsofpeople.

6.4 Community’sunderstandingofCommunityCommittee

Community Committee was formed by SEML to bridge between Company’s and the

community’sneedsaround theproject area. Theexpectedoutput is a favourable conducive

relationshipbetweentheCompanyandsurroundingcommunities.

Out of 133 respondents surveyed, 60 persons (45%) indicated that theywere aware of the

existenceofCommunityCommittee.12(9%)respondentsdidnotgiveanswerwhiletherest

respondedunawareoftheCommittee21(16%),donotknowaboutthecommittee33(25%),

and those who just knew during the survey 7 (5%) (Table 6-14). In terms of the source of


informationabouttheCommittee,mostoftheinformationisreceivedfromSEML(23%),from

friendsandvillageapparatus(11%each),family(3%)andheadofRW/RT(1%),andfromother

sources(2%).NoneoftherespondentsobtainedtheCommitteeinformationfrommedia.The

numberofrespondentswhodidnotanswertothequestionis67persons(50%)(Table6-15).

Thedata suggests thatabouthalfof the surveyedPAPawareof the community committee.

Moredisseminationactivitiesof theCommitteeneed tobecarriedout toPAP througheasy

andaccessiblecommunicationtoolsandevents.

Table6-14 AwarenessofComunityCommittee

N=133

Yes,have 60(45%)

Notyet 21(16%)

Don’tknow 33(25%)

Justknownow 7(5%)

Noanswer 12(9%)

Table6-15 SourceofinformationaboutCommunityCommittee

N=133

Family 4(3%)

Friends 14(11%)

VillageApparatus 14(11%)

Rukun Warga (RW)/Rukun

Tetangga (RT) or cluster of

populationinavillage

1(1%)

SEML 30(23%)

Media 0(0%)

Other 3(2%)

Noanswer 67(50%)

TheparticipationofthePAPintheCommunityCommitteeisalsolow(Table6-16).50%or67

outof133 respondents indicated that thehavenotparticipated in thecommitteeeventsor

activities,14%or18persons impliedthatthehaveparticipatedoror joinedtheactivitiesof

theCommitteeand36%or48personsdidnotanswer.

Table6-16 ParticipationinCommunityCommitteeevents/activities.

N=133

Notyet 67(50%)

Yes,have 18(14%)


Noanswer 48(36%)

InregardtounderstandingoftherolesoftheCommittee,7outof126respondnetsknewwhat

therolewas,whiletheremainderdidnotrespond(whethertheyknewornot,isnotknown).

Answersofthe7respondentsvariedandwereasfollows:

§ Forjobrecruitment(2)

§ BridgingthepublicandgovernmentofficialswithPTSupreme(1)

§ Communitycomplaintscentre(1)

§ Fordiscussinglandmeasurementissues(1)

§ Collectinglocalworkforcedataandaccommodatingpeople'saspirations(1)

Formulatingactivities(1)

Table6-17 PerceptiontowardtheperformanceandbenefitsofCommunityCommittee

N=131

Good 3(2%)

Notgoodenough 7(5%)

Noanswer 121(93%)

Although45%haveheardofthiscommunitycommittee,theyseemtonotbeveryimpressed

aboutit.Thatshouldbefurtherinvestigated.Thosewhothoughtittobegoodreasonedthat

it was the link between SEML and the community (1) or that it was easy to deal with the

committee(1).Thosewhodidnotfinditusefulorgoodenoughsaidthatthey

§ Donotknow/haveseenitsperformance(2)

§ havenotseenitsactivities/itsrealization(2)

§ donotknowthepurpose(1)

§ thoughtifwasnotperformingwell(1)

§ thoughtitdoesnotconveytheaspirationsofthepeople(1)

§ founditalittleforced(1)


7 VULNERABILITYASSESSMENT

Vulnerability can be defined as a general condition of being exposed to potentially harmful

eventsortorisksthatcanhavean impactonfuturewelfare,suchasforexampletheriskof

remaining or becoming poor. Poor is generally referred to a well-defined low level of

consumptionoffoodandnon-foodgoodsaswellaslimitedaccesstoservices.Variousexternal

aswellas internal factors influencethevulnerabilityofahousehold.External factorsarethe

availabilityofeducationalandhealthfacilitiesforexample,whileinternalfactorsarereferred

toafamilyorhousehold’scapacityofcopingwithexposurestorisksandharmfulevents.This

assessment has focused on food, health, environment, and social and economic security as

wellasatgenderandeducationalattainment.

Theindicatorsbelowwereusedtoidentifyvulnerableindividualsandhouseholdsaspotential

participantsinthefocusgroupdiscussionsinordertofurtherstudytheirparticularneedsfor

skillsdevelopmentandchallengesforlivelihoodimprovement.

7.1 Screeningofresults

7.1.1 Foodsecurity

Householdswereaskediftheyhadeverexperiencedanytimeofhungerorstarvinginthelast

3years,forhowlongandforwhatreasonsandhowtheywerecopingwiththat.Noneofthe

households surveyed indicated that they had ever experiencedperiods of starving (113 had

not,and19didnotwishtoanswer).

7.1.2 SocialSecurity

Thesurveyquestionslookedatifhouseholdswereinvolvedinanysocialactivities,suchasany

villageinstitutions,andwhotheyapproachedtosolveconflictswithintheirfamilyorwiththeir

neighbours.Typeofconflictsandhowoftenthesewereexperiencedwasalsoasked.

Most of the households are not active in any of the village organizations, of thosewho are

active (18%) they either work for the local government or are involved in traditional

organizations related toMinangkabautraditions (adat leader,clan leader ,etc)or Indonesian

villageorganizations(scouts,women’sgroup)(Table7-1).

Table7-1 Activeinvillageorganizations

Activeinvillageorganization

Active 24 18% 21%

NotActive 93 70% 79%

Noanswer 15 11%

Total 132 100% 100%

Theformalandinformalinstitutionsincarryingoutitsrolesandfunctionshavenotyetbeen

supported by adequatemeans, especially from the village administration (Nagari) and sub-

village (Jorong). Institutions existing in the study area in general is the KAN, Nagari


ConsultativeBody(Bamus), InstituteforCommunityEmpowerment inNagari(LPMN),farmer

groups, theVillageUnitCooperatives (KoperasiUnitDesa/KUD), YouthOrganization (Karang

Taruna), Religious Study Club (Majelis Ta'lim), groups on Islamic studies, funeral organizing

groups (kelompok kematian), Quranic recital group (kelompok yasinan), Family Welfare

Improvement Society (PKK) and youth groups.Details of the functionof theseorganizations

andwhetherthesearepaidorhonorarypositionsarelistedinTable7-2.

Table7-2 Typeofvillageorganizations/activities

Organization Acronym Explanation Paid/Honorary

BadanMusyawarah

DesaorVillage

Forum

Bamusor

BPD

BPDisthevillagelevellegislativethatconsists

ofcommunityfiguressuchascustomary

leaders,headsofcommunityclusterorRukun

Warga,professionals,andreligiousleaders.

MembersofBPDareselectedevery6years

throughBPDSpecialmeeting.

Honorary

Gabungan

PerkumpulanPetani

PemakaiAiror

AssociationofWater

UsingFarmers

GP3A Theassociationoffarmerswhousewateris

formedbythegovernmentwiththebasic

functionto,a).distributeirrigationwaterjustly

andefficiently,b)tomanageconflictjustly

amongwaterusers,and3)tomaintaintertier

irrigationnetwork.P3Aiscloselysupported

andfacilitatedbytheGovernment.

Honorary

KerapatanAdat

Nagari

KAN KANisacustomaryinstitutionattheNagarior

villageleveltopreservetheMinangkabau

customs,whichconsistsofdatukfromevery

clan,intellectual,religiousleader,anddubalang

whoisinchargeforcommunitysafetyand

security.KANisunderabiggerinstitutionatthe

provinciallevelnamelyLembagaKerapatan

AdatAlamMinangkabau(LKAAM).

Honorary

Lembaga

Pemberdayaan

MasyarakatNagari

orInstitutionfor

NagariCommunity

Development

LPMN LPMNisformedtosupportNagarigovernment

toaccommodateandrealizetheneedsand

aspirationofcommunities.ThetasksofLPMN

aretodevelopaprticipativedevelopmentplan,

tomobilizecommunitymutualassistance,and

toimplementandcontroldevelopment.

Honorary

MajilisTa’lim MT MajlisTa’limisreligiouseducationalactivities

organizedorganizedbycommunitiesattended

byparticipantsofallages,usuallyexcept

childrenbecausechildrenwillattendPengajian.

Gathering

Mamak,Ninik

Mamak

- NinikMamakisheadoftheclan(suku)whilea

Mamakisthemother’sbrother,theyhavethe

authoritytodecideinaccordancewithadatlaw

Honorary

Pengajian - PengajianisaregularAlQuraneducation

activitiesorganizedbycommunitiesforlearning

purposessuchaslearninghowtorecite

Alqur’andalsotounderstandthemeaningand

contentofAlQur’anfromchildren,adult,and

adult.

Gathering

PegawaiKantor

PemerintahDaerah

Pemda Localgovernmentofficer Paid


Organization Acronym Explanation Paid/Honorary

Pertolongan

PertamaPada

Kecelakaan

P3K FirstAid Honorary

Pembinaan

Kesejahteraan

KeluargaorFamily

WelfareCouching

PKK PKKiswomenonlycommunitybased

organizationestablishedandsupportedby

Governmenttoempowerwomenin

development.

Honorary

GerakanPramuka

(PrajaMudaKarana)

Pramuka Scouts Honorary

RukunTetangga RT NeighbourhoodGroup Honorary

KelompokTani Famersgroup Honorary

WaliJorong - HeadofJorong,governmentposition,dicided

byWaliNagariDecreebasedonelectionof

decisionbycommunityevery3years

Paid

WaliNagari - HeadofNagari,governmentposition,elected

every6years.

Paid

Problemswithinthefamilyaresolvedeitherwithinthefamily,theparents,siblings,thelarger

family or the Mamak. For matters relating to neighbours the majority of the households

consulttheheadofthejorong.

Table7-3 Whoisconsultedforfamilymatters?

Helpwithfamilyinternal

conflicts

Percentagedistribution

Family 50%

LargerFamily 7%

Mamak 6%

Parents 14%

Siblings 2%

Alone 8%

Noanswer/Abstained 14%

Total 100%

Table7-4 Whoisconsultedforneighborhoodmatters?

Helpwithneighborhood

conflicts


Family 8%

LargerFamily 2%

Mamak 5%

HeadofJorong 60%

HeadofScouts/Youthgroup 8%

Alone 1%

Nagariinstitution 1%

Closestfriend 1%


Helpwithneighborhood

conflicts


Traditionalvillageleaders 1%

Noanswer/Abstained 14%

Total 100%

Onlytwooutof133householdsrespondedthattheyoftenexperiencedconflictinthefamily

orwithneighbours,15indicatedrarelyand90saidnever,while26didnotrespond.Typesof

conflictsthatwerementionedare listed inTable7-5.Accordinglydisputesoveremployment

opportunities, land and thefts were mentioned most often whereas young community

members and environmental concerns seem to be less of an issue that can potentially turn

intoaconflict.

Table7-5 Typesocialconflict

Typesofconflicts Frequency

EmploymentOpportunity 10

Land 8

Theft 6

Children&youngsterssocializing 2

Noise 2

Waterpollution 2

Airpollution 1

Source:Greencap,SESVASurvey,2017

7.1.3 Economicsecurity

Economicsecurity lookedatemploymentstatus, family incomeanddebtpressureaswellas

electricityandhousingcondition.

Ofa totalof124headofhouseholds6 indicated theywereunemployed.Halfof themwere

seekingajobforlessthan2yearswhiletheotherswerelookingforajobsincemorethanfour

years.Mostly itwasduetonoopportunitiesarisingaccordingtothesurveyed.Whileforthe

women,therewasonlyonewifewhoreportedthatshewasunemployednotmorethanone

year.

41outof 124households indicated theyhad topaydebt instalments regularly. Reasons for

takingoutaloanwerevaried(


Table7-6). Itwasassumedthathavingtotakeouta loanforpayingforchildren’seducation

andordailyexpensesaswellas forhaving tobuymedicinewasdeemedasan indicator for

potentiallybeingvulnerable.Forthese12householdsthedebtswereexaminedinmoredetail

Table 7-7. Debts ranged between IDR 1million to IDR 140million andmonthly instalments

betweenIDR200,000andIDR2.4million.


Table7-6 Reasonsfortakingoutaloan

Type Frequency Vulnerable?

Buildhouse 3

Buycar 1

Buyland 3

Buylivestock 1

Buymedicine 1 couldbevulnerable

Buymotorbike 1

Childreneducation 7 couldbevulnerable

Dailyexpenses 4 couldbevulnerable

Invest 18

Work 1

Total 40

Debt pressure of the 12 households that took out a loan for children’s education, buying

medicinganddailyexpenseswasasfollows:

Table7-7 Debtpressureof12households

Measure TotalDebt(IDR)MonthlyInstalments

(IDR)

Average 27,250,000 796,333

Min 1,000,000 200,000

Max 140,000,000 2,400,000

StandardDeviation 43,703,807 759,531

For5ofthetotal12households identifiedaspotentiallyvulnerabletherewasdataavailable

on income. Monthly debt pressure varied between IDR 200,000 to IDR 2,4 million. Debt

pressureversusmonthlyincomewasanalysedaspertablebelow.

7.1.3.1 Housingcondition

Intermsofhousing,mosthousesofthesurveyedhouseholdsweremadeofstone(78%)and

cementwhilearound20%weremadeofhardwood.Mostroofsweremadeofcorrugatediron

(85%),whilearound7%were tiled,and7%were straw thatched.Most flooringwascement

(67%), some 23% had tiles, 8% had wooden planks and 3% of the houses had an

earthen/adobefloor.


Table7-8 AccesstoElectricity

Measure Percentageof

Households

InstalledCapacity

• 90W 0.8%

• 450W 31.8%

• 900W 62.8%

• 1300W 4.7%

PaymentSchedule

Prepaid 12%

Postpaid 88%

Blackouts

• Often 47%

• Notreally 53%

7.1.3.2 Cookingfuel

AlmosttwothirdsofthesurveyedhouseholdsboughttheircookingfuelinformofLNG,while

38%collectedwoodforfiringtheircookingstoves.

7.1.3.3 Householdincomeandexpenditure

Households whose monthly per capita income was below Rp.1,000,000 were considered

vulnerablewithreferencetotheSouthSolokpovertylineofRp.292,292.Twohouseholdswere

classifiedasbelowthepovertyline(Table7-9).

Table7-9 HouseholdswithMonthlyPerCapitaIncomenearorbelowPovertyLine

HHSurvey

NoHhmembers peryearincome

percapitaper

yearincome

percapitaper

monthincome

1 5 36,000,000 7,200,000 600,000

3 4 4,080,000 1,020,000 85,000

18 6 14,436,000 2,406,000 200,500

19 2 18,000,000 9,000,000 750,000

21 1 3,600,000 3,600,000 300,000

54 5 57,600,000 11,520,000 960,000

68 3 24,000,000 8,000,000 666,667

97 5 57,600,000 11,520,000 960,000

112 3 28,800,000 9,600,000 800,000

115 5 55,200,000 11,040,000 920,000

Debt pressure versus monthly income from paid work was also looked at. One of the

householdshadahighdebtpressurewithlittlemonthlyincometocover.


Table7-10 Debtpressureversusmonthlyincome

NKMonthly

InstallmentsTotalDebt

Total

Monthly

IncomeofHH

Incomeminus

monthlyInstallment

7 1,500,000 60,000,000 n.a. -1,500,000

18 1,000,000 25,000,000 1,203,000 203,000

97 300,000 10,000,000 4,800,000 4,500,000

115 2,000,000 150,000,000 4,600,000 2,600,000

7.1.4 Environmentalsecurity

Environmental security lookedat if therewereanynaturaldisasters that thehouseholdwas

affectedby.Accordingly,107outof131hadexperiencedanaturaldisasterinthepast,while

only10outof93indicatedthattheirfamilywasimpactedinsomeway.Andonly4households

statedwhat kindof impact itwaswhich ranged from theirhousebeingdamagedor slightly

damagedandtwomentionedthericefieldbeingdamagedwithresultingharvestfailure.

Table7-11Householdsimpactedbynaturaldisasters

Detail Frequency N

Experienceddisaster 107 outof131

Familyimpactedbydisaster 10 outof93

Houseslightlydamaged 1

Housedamaged 1

Ricefielddamaged 1

Ricefieldanddryland(ladang)harvestfailure 2

7.1.5 Healthsecurity

Thehealth securityquestionsexaminedanymajorhealth issuesoccurring in thehousehold,

theconditionofthehouse,accesstowaterandsanitation.Only15householdsindicatedthat

oneoftheirfamilymembershadamajorhealthproblem.Formosttheseproblemsoccurredin

the last10yearsandwererelatedtostomach, lungsand lightstroke.Mosthouseholds that

wereaffectedusedthegovernmenthealthinsuranceschemetopayforthebills.

Table7-12 ReportedHealthIssues

Item No N Typeofhealthissue

Healthproblem 15 outof121

Howlong

• <5yrs 7 Lungs,pinchednerve,kidney,gastricacid,cyst

removed,breathingdifficulties

• 5-10yrs 5 Neckpain,lightstroke,stomachulcer,prostate,

typhoid


Item No N Typeofhealthissue

• >10yrs 2 Lightstroke,stomachulcer

Seenadoctor

• notyet 1 outof14

• already 12 outof14

• everynowand

then

1 outof14

Doctorbillspaidfor

Jaminankesehatan

(Jamkes)*help

1 outof9

OwnpocketandBPJS* 2

BPJS 4

BPJSandFamily 1

Ownpocket 1

*JaminanKesehatan=BadanPenyelenggara JaminanSosial (BPJS)KesehatanorSocial SecurityAdministrator for

HealthisanappointedagencybyGovernmenttoimplementnationalsocialsecuritysystemforworkforceaswellas

forhealthinIndonesia.

7.1.5.1 AccesstoWater

Water is a natural resource essential to sustain humanhealth andwell-being;Many factors

affectwaterqualityandavailabilityandseveralinfectiousdiseasesarewaterbornediseasesor

water becomes the habitat of disease vectors for diseases, such as for examplemalaria or

dengue. Sanitation is definedas “provisionof facilities and services for the safedisposal of

humanurineandfeces”and“themaintenanceofhygienicconditions,throughservicessuchas

garbage collection and wastewater disposal.” Many diseases are caused by improper

sanitationandimprovingfacilitieshasamajorbeneficialimpactonhealth,suchasforexample

diarrhoeaandtyphoid.

Overall,inIndonesia,threeinfourhouseholdshaveaccesstoanimprovedsourceofdrinking

waterand70%ofhouseholdsuseanappropriatewatertreatmentmethodpriortodrinking.

With respect to sanitation, 68% of households have improved toilet facilities that are not

shared with other households and about 12% use the natural water environment, such as

rivers,streamsorcreeksastoilets.

In thesurveyedhouseholds,mostusetownwater forall theirwaterneeds,whilesomealso

havetheirownwellorspringneartheirhouse.Mostusethesamesourceforalltheirwater

needs.75%havetheirowntoilet,whilestillalargenumber(17%)usetheriverfordefecation

and5%useacommunaltoilet(Table7-13andTable7-14).

Table7-13 NumberofHouseholdsandAccesstoWater

Source Drinking Cooking Washing/Toilet

PDAM/TownWater 73of127 72of128 67of128


Source Drinking Cooking Washing/Toilet

Ownwell 27of129 24of129 20of129

Communalwell 3of128 2of128 1of128

Springaroundthehouse 9of128 10of128 10of128

Pond 0of128 0of128 0of128

River 2of128 2of128 2of128

Other 16of128 17of128 18of128

Table7-14 NumberofHouseholdsandAccesstoSanitation

Defecationlocation Numberof

Households

Share

OwnToilet 99 75%

PublicToilet 7 5.3%

River 23 17.3%

Other 3 2.3%

Total 132 100%

7.1.6 OtherVulnerabilityIndicators

7.1.6.1 UseofCompensation

Householdswereaskedforwhattheyusedthecompensationreceivedandiftheyhadputany

of the compensation aside as savings.Most of the households needed themoney for daily

expenses(62%)andschoolfees(35%),andonlyafewinvestedintoland(8%)orsavedupthe

compensationreceived(5%).

Table7-15NumberofHouseholdsandUseofCompensationMoney

N=133 Yes No Noanswer

DailyNeeds 82 31 20

SchoolFees 47 48 38

Bike/Car 28 69 36

Other 28 84 21

Land 11 86 36

House 6 91 36

Saved 7 105 21

Themoneythatthe9%paidintothebanktosaverangedbetweenIDR5millionto70million,

withanaverageofIDR1.6milion.


Landsoldto/acquiredbySEMLasapercentageofthetotalland(includinglandboughtafter)

rangedfromlessthan10%to100%,thatisallthelandthatpeopleownedorfarmedwassold

toSEML.Detailsareaspertablebelow.

Table7-16 NumberofHouseholdsandPercentageof Landsold to/acquiredbySEML

fromTotalLand(includinglandboughtafter)

N=93

Morethan75% 21

Between25%and75% 50

Lessthan25% 22

Lessthan10%(partof

theabove)

7

Mosthouseholds,forwhichnumbersforareaoflandwasavailable,havesoldbetween25%to

75%oftheirtotallandownedandorfarmedtoSEML.4

7.1.6.2 Gender

Therewere24womenidentifiedbetweentheageof27and58whohadonlyprimaryschool

attained ifeverandwhowerenotworking.19of the24werehousewifesand5wereother

membersofthefamily.

7.1.6.3 Educationalattainment

Thesurveyidentifiedintotal12youngstersbetweentheageof20and30,whohadeitheronly

finished primary school if ever and who were not married yet. Two out of the 12 were

reportedtohavingdifficultiesinreading.Oneofthe12wasunemployed,whileallothershad

work.

7.1.6.4 SatisfactionwithSEMLLandacquisition

There were 5 households (or 4% of the total surveyed) that felt the compensation they

received for the land acquired by SEML was below standard price.While three of the five

householdwerestillsatisfiedwiththatprice,twoofthemfelttheywereforcedtoreceiveit.

Allofthe5householdshoweverindicatedthattheywerenotsatisfied,thatwouldnotwantto

sellagainiftheycouldgobackagainandthattheyfelttheimpactwasnotpositive.

7.1.7 SummaryofVulnerabilityAssessment

Tobeclassifiedasa(potentially)vulnerablehousehold,morethanoneoftheabovediscussed

indicatorhastoapply.Theoneexceptionwasmadetotheaveragepercaptiaincomeanddebt

44Note, the veracityof this statementmayneed tobe further investigated, as thenumbers for total

landmaynotallbeaccurate.40ofthe133householdsdidnotdetailtheirlandowningsorinformation

didnotmatch.


pressure versus income as these are the most significant indicators that can impact on a

household’s ability to survive in today’s society and economic system. A household with

insufficient financial means will struggle regardless of other indiciators of security being

sufficiently covered. The following table lists all the households that were applicable with

regardstothisclassification.

Whilemanyof thesehouseholdshavebeen invited in the focusgroupdiscussions,notallof

themhaveparticipated. It is thereforeparamount forSEML toeventually follow-upon their

status,asthissocio-economicprofileisonlythebeginning.

Also,otherhouseholdsthathavenotbeenidentifiedhere,maybecomevulnerableforsome

reasonoranotherorarevulnerablebutdatacollectedonthesewasincompleteorincorrect.

TheCSRprogramthatSEMLisimplementingintheregion,willhoweverhelptoaddresssuch

insufficiencies or new emerging (if ever) cases. It assumed, once the project runs and CSR

activities run at full speed, continuedmonitoring and evalution of the programswill ensure

thatvulnerablehouseholdswillbesupported.

Atotalnumberof18householdshavebeenidentifiedasvulnerableorpotentiallyvulnerable

(colour highlighted), they either apply to more than one of the vulnerability indicators (6

households, light yellow highlight) or have a low per capita income (11 households, orange

higlight)orhighdebtpressureversus income(1household,yellowhighlight)(SeeTable7-17

below).

Itisrecommendedthatthesearebeingcloselymonitoredandactivelyincludedinanumberof

CSRactivites.

Another19households(notcolourhighlighted)havebeenincludedinthetablebelowasthey

tick two vulnerability indicator boxes. These households could be potentially vulnerable or

becomevulnerablewhenasuddenchangeoflifehappens,suchasforexampleanillnessthat

preventsthemainbreadwinnertocontinuetoworkorbecomingunemployedforavarietyof

reasons.

It is suggested that these households are included in the monitoring activities and where

deemednecessaryalsoparticipatedintheCSRprograms.

Notethatforallidentifiedhouseholdsitwillbeimportanttoconfirmidentifiedindicatorsof

vulnerabilitytofindspecificmeanstosupporttheseinbecomingmoreresilient.


Table7-17 IdentifiedVulnerableandPotentiallyVulnerableSurveyedPAHH

PAHHSurveyNo

Periodsofstarving

Conflictwith

neighbours/family

Familyor

neighborhoodconflict

UnemployedHeadof

HH

UnemployedW

ife

Loan-m

edicine

Loan-schoolfees

Loan-dailyneeds

Loan-2forbuying

land

Incomevsdebt

pressure

Percapitaincome

Houseing-Strawroof

Houseing–Earthern

/Woodenfloor

Health-Chronicissue

Sanitation-River

wateruseforMCK

SEMLLA

process-Not

happy

Male<30,lowEA

Male<30,lowEA&

unemployed

Male-notactive,low

EAilliterate

W’n-W

ives,15-64,

notwork’g,lowEA

W’n-Other,15-64,

notwork’g,lowEA

Count

Sum

PercentageLandSold

34

3 1

2 3 6 0%

54

1

1 1

1 1

5 5 na

75

1

2

2 3 2%

83

1

1

1

3 3 67%

97

1 1 1

3 3 100%

107

1

1

1 3 3 73%

7

1

1

2 2 14%

18

1 1

2 2 11%

19

1

1

2 2 na

68

1

1

2 2 na

115

1 1

2 2 na

1

1

1 1 25%

3

1

1 1 na

10

1

1 1 100%

21

1

1 1 0%

44

1

1 1 36%

78

1

1 1 50%

112

1

1 1 100%


PAHHSurveyNo

Periodsofstarving

Conflictwith

neighbours/family

Familyor

neighborhoodconflict

UnemployedHeadof

HH

UnemployedW

ife

Loan-m

edicine

Loan-schoolfees

Loan-dailyneeds

Loan-2forbuying

land

Incomevsdebt

pressure

Percapitaincome

Houseing-Strawroof

Houseing–Earthern

/Woodenfloor

Health-Chronicissue

Sanitation-River

wateruseforMCK

SEMLLA

process-Not

happy

Male<30,lowEA

Male<30,lowEA&

unemployed

Male-notactive,low

EAilliterate

W’n-W

ives,15-64,

notwork’g,lowEA

W’n-Other,15-64,

notwork’g,lowEA

Count

Sum

PercentageLandSold

24

1

1

2 2 50%

30

1

1

2 2 40%

35

1

1

2 2 50%

62

1 1

2 2 na

69

1

1

2 2 na

70

1

1

2 2 na

71

1

1

2 2 na

72

1

1

2 2 na

77

1 1

2 2 50%

82

1

1 2 2 50%

89

1

1

2 2 44%

98

1

1

2 2 29%

102

1

1

2 2 14%

103

1

1

2 2 50%

105

1

1

2 2 94%

106

1

1

2 2 33%

113

1

1

2 2 100%

127

1 1 2 2 na

129

1

1

2 2* 14%


*Thosehouseholdsidentifiedwithonlyonecriterionforvulnerability,arenotincludedinthistable.

householdswithmorethan2areasofvulnerability

householdsotherwiseidentifiednearpovertyline(accordingtopercapitaincome)

householdsotherwiseidentifiedwithhighdebtpressure


7.2 VulnerabiltyandLandAcquisition

Whilewecannotknowtheexactimpactlandacquisitionhadontheaffectedhouseholdssince

baselinedataisnotavailable,thevulnerabilityassessmentcomparedwiththepercentageland

soldcanshedsomelightontheissue.5

Consideringthoseonlywhoindicatedtohavesoldmorethan0%land,thevastmajorityhave

soldmorethan10%,andmorethanhalfhavesoldmorethan50%oftheirtotalland.Allbut

oneofthehouseholdshave lowpercapita incomeandtwoofthesehouseholdsalsohavea

highdebtpressure.

Thus, clearly, having sold land did not benefit all of the households, in fact, having sold so

muchlandonlyacoupleofyearsago,onewouldthinktheywouldn’tbeappearingatthetop

ofthelistofthemostvulnerable.

Table7-18PercentageLandSoldandVulnerabilityofHouseholds

7.3 ResultsfromFGDs

In terms of vulnerability, men participants identified several factors that make people and

householdbecomevulnerableasfollows:

5Notehowever,thattheresultshavetobetreatedcarefullyandneedtobere-examined,householdby

household.Forexampleforthe18householdsidentifiedasvulnerable,5didnotrevealthepercentage

oflandsoldtoSEML,whiletwoofthehouseholdsdeclaredtheyhadsoldnone.Oneofthereasonsfor

theseincrongruenciesmaybethatthosewhowereinvolvedinthelandacquisitionatthetimemaynot

havenecessarilybeenpresentwhilethissurveywascarriedout.

PAHHSurveyNo

Incomevsdebt

pressure

Percapitaincome

Count

Sum

PercentageLandSold

97 1 1 3 3 100%

10 1 1 1 100%

112 1 1 1 100%

107 3 3 73%

83 1 3 3 67%

78 1 1 1 50%

44 1 1 1 36%

1 1 1 1 25%

7 1 2 2 14%

18 1 1 2 2 11%

75 1 2 3 2%


1. Ageingpopulationandvulnerablepeople:ingeneralproductiveageofmenaccordingto

participants is 65 years old,who can still work as farmers or livestock farmers.More

than65yearsoldisconsideredageingwhocannolongerbeproductive;

2. Young people with low level of educational attainment and who cannot work

productivelycomparedtoiftheyhavehighereducationalattainment;

3. Household who have no land and depend on other people’s request to work during

cultivationseason;thesepeoplebecomevulnerableduringnon-cultivationseasonwhen

theydonothavesourceofincome;

4. Household with many family members or dependents: head of family has limited

incomebutmanydependentsthathehastosupport.

Thewomen group identified vulnerability as those peoplewho have limited ability towork

suchaspeoplewithdisabilities,e.g.blindnessandsenilepeoplewhodonothavesupporting

familyofeitherkinorchildren.

8 SKILLSANDLIVELIHOODDEVELOPMENT

8.1 ReviewofskillandcapacitybuildingprogramcurrentlyonofferbySEML

Despite SEML project is not yet operating and productive, the Company has already

commencedcapacitybuildingthroughCSRprogramstoenhancecommunitycapacity/income

and self-sustaining capabilities. The Company’s Community Empowerment Policy is ‘helping

people to help them selves’, which mean building the capacity and capabilities of the

communitiestosustainablydevelopthemselves.

Until 2016, there are about 8 CSR program activities aimed to improve and develop the

capacity the theProjectaffectedcommunities,3activitiesunderEducationandHealthPillar

and 5 activities under Economic Empowerment Pillar. These activities are carriedout at the

regency,sub-districtandJoronglevelneartheProjectarea.

Table8-1belowshowsexistingcapacitybuildingactivitiesofSEMLinthepillarsofeducation

andhealthandeconomicempowerment.

Table8-1 ExistingSEMLCapacityDevelopmentProgram

Pillar Activities Location

EducationandHealth Provisionof10unitsofcomputersto

6schoolsinSolokSelatan

SolokSelatan

Developmentofnewclassroomof

JuniorHighSchoolandKindergarten

inAlamPauhDuovillages

SolokSelatan

EconomicEmpowerment Developmentofproductionsystem

andinternship/coachingof

embroideryartisans

Jorongnearprojectsite,

Pekonina,KampungBarum

PinangAwan,andTaratakTinggi

Continueprovisionofcapitalsupport

forLembagaKeuanganMikro-

Agribisnis,LKMAoragribusiness

microfinanceinstitutionandprovide

PauhDuoSub-District


Pillar Activities Location

trainingtonewenterpreneurs

Supportthedevelopmentof

traditionalmarketinKampungBaru

sub-village/hamlet.

PauhDuoSub-District

DonationforbuyingfishseedsofIkan

Larangan(literallymeansprohibited

fish)

SolokSelatan

Provisionof2000Macadamia

seedlingsforselectedhouseholds

PauhDuoSub-District

8.2 ResultsfromFGDsandKIIs

This sub-section highlights the results of four FGDs (Men, Women, Youth and Bundo

Kanduang/Woman Leaders Groups) based on four themes of discussions, that is the

knowledge of local communities of existing capacity building programs, challenges and

limitation, solutions for economic andwelfare improvement, andneeds andexpectation for

livelihoodandskilldevelopment.

8.2.1 Existingcapacitybuildingprogram

Therehavebeenanumberofcapacitybuildingprogramscarriedoutbygovernment for the

communitiesaroundMuaraLabohandProjectarea.Theprogramrangesfromdirectallocation

of cash, rice (food), and health card for the poor, financing, and community empowerment

programssuchastrainingandcapacitybuilding.

The list of community development programs identified during FGD that have been

implementedorreceivedbysomeoftheparticipantsareasfollows:

1. FishbreedingfromFishBreedingCenterorBBI(BalaiBenihIkan).

2. Cattleandlivestockallocatione.g.cows,ducks.

3. Houserenovationprogramforthepoor

4. Plantortreesseedlinge.g.mangosandmahogany.

5. Gasstoveallocation.

6. Riceforthepoor.

7. CommunitySocialDirectAssistance(inCash)orBantuanLangsungSosialMasyarakator

BLSM.

8. Skilltraining,e.g.wielding,electricity,motorbikeworkshop,andcooking,.

9. Revolvingfundandmicrofinance.

10. ProvisionofsewingMachine.

11. Provisionofricefieldplowingmachine.

12. National Program for Community Empowerment, Program Nasional Pemberdayaan

Masyarakat (PNPM), such as building bridge through community based public

infrastructuredevelopment.


13. FamilyWelfare andEmpowerment,PemberdayaandanKesejahteraanKeluarga (PKK),

e.g.counselingonabalancednutrition,measurestoimprovefamilyempowerment.

14. DasaWismaGroupof20people toanticipateanycommunitiesvulnerable topoverty,

illness,anddeceases.

15. Integratedhealthservicesfortheelderlyandbabiesunderfive.

16. Irrigation.

17. Scholarship.

8.2.2 Challengeandlimitationofcurrentcapacitybuilding

CurrentcapacitybuildingprogramaccordingtotheFGDparticipantsencountersmany issues

thatmaketheprogramsnotsustainable.Thesechallengesandlimitationsareasfollows:

Securityissue

Mostpressingsecurityissueislivestocktheftsuchascows,chicken,andfish.Theftbecomesa

big issue and concern among communities that any community development needs to

considerthisaspect.

Lackofsupportingassistance

Mostoftheassistanceprovidedtothepeopleisnotsupportedwithsufficientknowledgeand

proper training which becomes not sustainable. In other cases, communities do not have

resourcetocontinuetheactivityforinstancetheydonothaveenoughmoneytobuyfishfeed

forfishbreedingprogram.

NaturalDisaster

Naturaldisasterlikefloodcausesfailureinagriculturalactivities.Forsmallfarmers,thecapital

they invest in agriculturemay easily disappear as the result of disaster and it is difficult for

themtogetnewcapitalandtostartthelivelihoodagain.

Difficultyinpayingdebtinstallment

This is attitude issues where to some people it is very difficult to pay debt installment.

“Meminjamrasadiberi, kalaumembayar rasakehilangan”,or“loaned is likegranted,paying

debtislikeloss”,thatistheexpressionsharedbyFGDsparticipantsthataccordingtothemone

ofthefactorscontributetothefailureofrevolvingloanprogram.Topayafixedmonthlydebt

payment is also difficult for the people because their ability to pay debt depends on their

revenueor income.Thewomengroupshowsmoresuccessl inmanagingrevolving loanthan

menaccordingtoFGDparticipants,whichiswhyoneofrevolvingfundwhichwasallocatedfor

meneventuallyshiftedtowomen.

NoCapitaltostartabusiness

Someparticipants said that theyalreadygot trainedonparticularexpertisesuchaswielding

andfurniturebuttheydonothavecapitaltostartupabusinessrelatedtotheirexpertise.

NoSkilltostartabusiness

Someparticipantssaidthattheydonothaveskillorexpertisetostartabusinesssuchashome

industry.


Weakmarketingoffarmers’produce

The marketing of farmers produce are very weak that results in low income of farmers

especiallyduringharvestseason.

Lackoftrustongroupcooperation

Currentcommunitycapacitybuildingsfailedbecauseofthegroupscreatedfortheprogramis

notsolidandnotrustamonggroupmembers.Thegroupswereformedbasedonlocationand

notbasedonemotionalbonding,whichiswhymanygroupbasedcooperationfailed.

Lackoftrustonvillageleaders/elites.

The communities have trust crisis toward local or village leaders to manage any capacity

buildingprogram.Theysuggestedthatfuturecapacitybuildingshouldbedirectlymanagedby

SEMLorotherthirdparty.

Landavailabilityissues

Land becomes an issue for some community members especially in the areas near Muara

Laboh.Anylandbasedcapacitybuildingsuchasagricultureorfishfarmingwillnotbepossible

ifbeneficiarydonothaveland.

8.2.3 Solutionforeconomicandwelfareimprovement

The FGD participants realized that the capacity building assistance provided by the

governmentdonot last longor sustainable.Mostof theassistance lasted shortand left ‘no

evidence’forthecommunitiesandeventothebeneficiariesthemselves.Thatiswhy,looking

backtopastexperience,FGDparticipantssuggestedthefollowingsolutionsforfutureplanof

communitycapacitybuildingandcommunitydevelopmentprogram,i.e.:

1. Anycommunityassistanceordevelopmentprogramshouldbedesigned for long term

development.

2. Assistance in the formof infrastructure,suchasbridges topaddy fieldswillbehelpful

andsustainable.

3. Assistanceshouldbedistributedthroughaneutralinstitutionsuchasdirectdistribution

bySEML.

4. Groupshouldbebasedonemotionalbonding,notbasedonlocation.

5. Marketingoffarmers’produceshouldbeimproved

6. Needtonurturesolidarityandcooperationamongcommunitymembers

7. Tosupportcontinuededucationthroughgovernment’seducationalPaketA,B,Cprogram

forthosewhocouldnotcontinuetheireducationduetoeconomicorotherreasons.

8. To raise the habit of giving donation (Santunan) to the elderly who is no longer

economicallyproductivesuchastoraisedonationfortheelderlyintheMosque.

9. Fortheelderly,assistanceshouldbegiventochildrenwhotakecareoftheelderlysuch

astoprovidetrainingtoimprovethefamilyeconomyso,

10. Promotethehabitofhelpingthepoor,generallythevulnerablepoorwomen.


8.2.4 NeedsandExpectation

FGD participants expressed their 25 needs and expectations to improve their skills and

livelihood which can be categorized into three main requests that are training and skill

development,capital,andprovisionofgoodsascapitalsuchasqualitybreedsandseeds.Table

8-2belowshowslistofneedsandexpectationsofeachgroupduringtheFGD.

Table8-2 ListofNeedsandExpectationsforSkillandLivelihoodDevelopment

MenGroup WomenGroup YouthGroup

Bundo

Kanduang/Women

LeaderGroup

1. Trainingonfish

farming.

2. Trainingon

qualitycow

livestock.

3. Trainingon

agriculture.

4. Trainingon

Furniture/carp

entry

1. Sewingand

embroideryskill.

2. Homebasefood

industrysuchas

dendengbaluik,

dendengpucuak

paranci.

3. Trainingon

Agriculture.

4. Trainingonduck

livestock.

1. Farmingskill

2. Qualitycommodity

seeds.

3. Hatcheryskill,how

toincubateeggs

usingmachine.

4. Furnitureexpertise.

5. Foodindustryskill.

6. Business

Managementskill.

7. Techniquesofhow

tomarket

products.

8. Trainingon

Kampongchicken

farming.

9. Trainingonfish

farmingandhowto

makefishponds

correctly.

1. Capitaltostart

businesswithout

interest.

2. Sewingmachine

toimprove

familyeconomy.

3. Quality

seeds/breeds

suchas

vegetableand

fish.

4. Trainingon

sewing.

5. Trainingon

cooking(tata

boga).

6. Trainingon

chicken

7. Trainingonfish

farming.

8. Trainingoncow

livestock.

9 DISCUSSIONANDRECOMMENDATIONS

9.1 IdentifiedneedsfromVulnerabilityAssessmentandSocioEconomicProfile

Vulnerability of the surveyed households is mainly centered around ecomic security and

educationalattainmentoftheyoungeragedmalepopulation.

Themainoccupationsofhouseholdmembersinthesurveyedareaarestillfocusedonfarming

activities.Thosewhoarelookingforjobsarethoseagedbetween20and30yearsold.Theyall

have in general a good educational attainement with most having completed secondary

highschoolandeventertiaryeducation.

However,inthissegment,therewerealsothosemostvulnerabletohavingdifficultiesfinding

a job, themale population surveyed with low educational attainment. Targeting the young

male to support them with targeted livelihood and skills development programs will be a

usefulapproach.Jobsthatevolvearoundtheprocessingoffarmingproduceorthemarketing


offarmingexperience(agroecotourism),astepfurtherinthesupplychainwouldhelptokeep

economicvalueintheregion.

Another area of vulnerability was the type of loans that are being taken out by the local

communityandthedebtpressurethatsomehouseholdsexperiencewhenlookingatmonthly

instalmentsversushouseholdincomefrompaidwork.

9.2 IdentifiedneedsfromCommunityandprioritization

As it is stated in the section 7.2.4, there are 25 needs and expectation raised by FGD

participants, 20 of which or about 80% requesting the provision of training and skill

development. Trainings and skill development are requested by all groups. The provision of

goods as capital such as quality breeds and seeds requested by the youth and Bundo

Kanduang/women leader groups, 12% or 3 requests. Finally, the request for capital to start

businessor livelihood,2outof25needsandexpectationorabout8percent.Figure9-1and

Figure9-2shownumberofneedsandexpectationsbygroupsanditspercentage

Figure9-1 VulnerableGroups,needsandexpectations

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Training/skill Capital Provisionof

goodsas

capital

MenGroup

WomenGroup

YouthGroup

BundoKanduang/Women

Leader


Figure9-2 Percentageandtypeofrequestedcapacitybuilding

Out of 20 trainings/skill development requested, the most frequently asked is training on

agricultureandfishfarming,whichare3requestsor15%respectively, followedbybusiness

management/marketing,Kampongchickenlivestock,sewing/embroidery,furniture/carpentry,

andcowlivestockwith2requestsor10%respectively.Othertrainingandskilldevelopments

are on duck livestock, food industry, hatchery, and cooking. Figure 9-3 shows types of

trainingsandskillsrequestedanditsfrequencyamongFGDgroups.

80%

8% 12%

Typeofcapacitybuildingrequested

Training/skill

Capital

Provisionofgoodsas

capital


Figure9-3 Typeofrequestedtrainings/skilldevelopment

Therequestforprovisionofcapitalwasraisedtostartuphomebasefoodindustryandcapital

tostartbusinesswithoutinterest.Thepaymentofdebtshouldbemanagedinsuchawaythat

iseasyforthepeopletopay.

Intermsoftheneedsfortheprovisionofgoodsfor livelihoodcapital, therearethreeneeds

raisedbyparticipants,theyare2requestsforqualitycommodityseedsandbreedssuchasfish

breeds,andsewingmachine.

9.2.1 PresentdayCSRprogramsufficienttocoverorwhatitalreadycovers

SEMLhasstartedcapacitybuildingprogramsasabovementioned insection7.1whichcovers

not only economic empowerment, but also education and health such as to provide sport

coachestoimproveathleteperformance.

SomeoftheneedsandexpectationsraisedbyFGDparticipantsinthisSESVAinfacthavebeen

implementedbySEMLintheselectedJorongnearandaroundProjectsiteandPauhDuoSub-

districtsuchasprovisionofinternshipforcattlefarmers,provisionofcapitalforfishfarmers,

internship of embroidery artisans, and distribution ofMacadamia seedlings. Some of these

activitiescanbereplicatedandadjustedwiththeconditionofprojectaffectedpeoplecovered

bythisSESVA.

FishFarming/FishPonds

CowLivestock

Agriculture

Furniture/carpentry

Sewing/embroidery

Cooking

KampongChickenLivestock

Hatchery

Foodindustry

BusinessManagement/marketing

Ducklivestock

TotalRequests

05

1015

20

3

2

3

2

2

1

2

1

1

2

1

20

TypeofTrainings/skillsRequested


9.2.2 Availabilityoflocalgovernment/publicandprivateeducational/vocationaltrainingsforskills

development/improvement

Solok Selatan Regency is newly established regency that splitfrom Solok Regency. As a new

regency, local governmentof Solok Selatanpromotes thedevelopment in the regency in all

aspectsincludingsocio-economicaspect.TheareaaroundMuaraLabohandSEMLProjectsite

haslimitedlandspacebecauseabout60%iswithinTamanNasionalKerinciSeblat(TNKS)or

Kerinci-SeblatNationalPark.

Considering this challenge, the local government promotes ecotourism, agro tourism, and

culturalsiteofSaribuRumahGadangnearMuaraLabuhandSEMLprojectareas.Toanticipate

thedevelopmentofindustriesandgreenandrenewableenergyinthearea,localgovernment

hasestablishedAkademiKomunitas(AK)orcommunityacademywithappliedvocationswhose

graduatesexpectedlycanbeeasilyemployedbyindustries.

The following list of local government offices and educational institutions provide capacity

buildingandvocationaltrainingtothelocalcommunities.

1. Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi (Disnakertrans) provinsi Sumatra Barat, Jalan.

UjungGurunNo.7Padang,KodePos25114,Telp.(0751)27417.

Provincial office for transmigration and workforce or of West Sumatra provides

workforceempowermentprogramstoanyareaswherethere isnoBalaiLatihanKerja

(BLK)orWorkTrainingCentre.Theofficealsocooperateswithregencyworkforceoffice

to provide services such as internship for Indonesian workforce before being sent

overseas.

2. Dinas Sosial Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Kab. Solok Selatan, Jalak Raya Lubuk

Gadang,KodePos27378,Telp.(0755)583438

Office for transmigration and workforce of Solok Selatan Regency provides capacity

buildingprogramforpeoplewhocannot furtherstudyanddisadvantagedpeoplesuch

asTenagaKerjaMandiri(TKM)orindependentworkforceprogramandMobilTraining

Unit (MTU) or Mobile Training Unit. The office implements central and provincial

governmentprogramsonworkforcetrainingandempowerment.

BalaiLatihanKerja(BLK)orWorkTrainingCentreisjustnewlyestablishedintheoffice

oftransmigrationandworkforce.Thereareseveralvocationaltrainingsareorganizedin

theCentre, that iswielding,cooking,garmentandfurniture(mobiletrainingunit).The

officeisnowintheprocessoffindingnewlocationtoaccommodatebetterfacilitiesfor

BLK. Vocational training can be requested by communities through Nagari to

DisnakertransandBLK.

3. DinasPendidikanKab.SolokSelatan,LubukGadang,Sangir,SolokSelatan,27778

DinasPendidikan (Disdik)orOfficeof Educationof Solok SelatanRegencyorganized a

number of educational programs to assist the poor and those who cannot continue

studydue toeconomicandother reasons.TheseprogramsareeducationalpackageA

(equal to primary school), B (junior high school), and C (high school plus life skill) to


improve one’s capacity. Besides educational package, the office established Sanggar

KegiatanBelajar(SKB)orStudioforLearningActivity.

4. AkademiKomunitasSolokSelatan,alamatsepertidiSMK1danSMK5dibawah.

AkademiKomunitasorCommunityAcademyiscollaborationDiploma1and2between

SolokSelatanRegencywithStatePolytechnicofPadang.TheAcademytemporarilyuses

thebuildingsofSMK1andSMK5(theaddressasbelow).SimilartoSMK,theAcademy

provides vocational classes for accounting, computer network engineering, and

electricity engineering. The Academy provides 70 percent practices and 30 percent

theories.

5. SekolahMenengahKejuruan(SMK)1,SolokSelatanJl.RayaKotoBaru–MuaraLabuh

Km.3,PulakekKotoBaru,Kec.SungaiPagu,Kab.SolokSelatan.

The vocational school offers three main expertises that is business management,

technology,andhotelandtourism.TheschoolorganizesPraktekKerjaIndustri(PKI)or

industrialwork internship. The school also initiated to invite industries as partners to

employstudentsfromthevocationalschool.

6. SekolahMenengahKejuruan(SMK)4,SolokSelatanJl.RayaMuaraLabuh-PadangAro

Km.6,2Kec.PauhDuo,Kab.SolokSelatan.

SimilartoSMK1,SMK4alsoprovidesvocationalstudybutindifferentfieldofexpertise

whichisonbuildingconstructionandmachine.

7. SekolahMenengahKejuruan(SMK)5,SolokSelatanJl.AnakLoloBancahPakanRabaa

TengahKec.KotoParikGadangDiateh,PakanRabaa,Kab.SolokSelatan.

Thevocationalschoolprovidestheexpertiseonelectricityandcomputernetworking.

9.3 RecommendationofthefutureCommunityCapacityBuilding

SEMLcapacitybuildingforthevulnerablepeopleshouldconsiderthefeedbacksreceivedfrom

theaffectedpeopleduringtheSESVAstudy.Thefollowingprinciplesshouldbeconsideredin

thedevelopmentandimplementationofskillandlivelihooddevelopmentprogram.

Individualbase(bondedbase)programratherthangroupbase

Thefeedbackobtainedfromthestudyshowsthatthepeopledonothavestrongspirittowork

andimplementaprograminagroup.Lackofgroupcooperationandbondingmayleadtothe

failureofcapacityprogramimplementationasithappenedinothercommunitydevelopment

programs and capacity building activities previously. While implementing individual base

program,SEMLmaydevelopthespiritofcooperationinateamorgroupamongcommunities

throughpilotprogramwith theexpectation that in the futuregroupbasedprogrammaybe

abletobeimplementedmoresuccessfully.

Needbase

Skills and livelihood development should be based on real needs and expectations of the

people identified such as through needs assessment study. Different project affected


individual hasdifferent needs that canbe included in theCompany’s developmentprogram

basedontheirpriorities.

Sustainability

Any capacity building and community development program should be designed

comprehensivelyincludingtoprovideanysupportingfundingormaterials/goodstomakesure

thattheintendedobjectiveandtargetofimprovingone’seconomicconditionisachieved.

Communalbase

Besidecertaincapacitybuildingprogramsthatshouldbeimplementedonindividualbase,the

feedbackfromcommunityshowthatcorporatesocialresponsibilityprogramandcommunity

development in the form of infrastructure development is more beneficial and useful for

communityatlarge.It isimportancetokeepthedevelopmentand/orrehabilitationofpublic

infrastructureandfacilities,whichcanbecarriedthroughcommunitycollaboration.

Genderequality

Any capacity developmentprogram shouldbe inclusiveof all genders andnodiscrimination

towardanyparticulargender.

Flexiblemodeofdebt/loanpayment

Capacitybuildingprograminmicro-financingsuchasthroughrevolvingfundshouldconsidera

flexiblewayofparticipants topay their loanordebt.The failureofpreviousmicro financing

scheme, among others, was because the participants (debtors) depend on their revenue of

sellingtheirproductstopaytheirdebtinstallment.

Assistingthefamilies/householdwhosupportvulnerablepeople

The communities around theProject areaespecially theMinang communityhas very strong

religiousandtraditionalpracticesthattheystillexerciseuntilnow.Vulnerablepeoplesuchas

the elderlywill be taken care by their children or by their closest families. That iswhy any

capacity building for vulnerable people in some cases can be directed toward improving

economicincomeofthefamilieswhosupportthevulnerablepeople.

Partnershipandengagementwithlocalstakeholders

Capacitydevelopmentprogramcanbe implementedand in some instanceseven stronger if

local stakeholderare involvedsuchas localgovernmentsuchas theDinasofTransmigration

andWorkforce that provides services for improving the skill of local workers and Dinas of

Educationthatprovideseducationalpackages(A,B,C)forthepeoplewhocannotcontinueand

completebasiceducationalrequirement.

SinceSEMLhasstartedCSRprogramthatcoverssomesuggestedcapacitybuildingactivities,it

canreplicatetheexistingactivitiestotheprojectaffectedcommunitieswithinthescopeofthis

study.ThesuggestedcapacityprogramsthathavenotbeenimplementedintheexistingCSR

canbeimplementedbyengagingorpartneringwithrelevantinstitutionwhohastheexpertise

suchasVocationalHighSchoolandCenterforWorkTraining.

Base on the needs identification and prioritization in the section 8.1.1 above, table below

show suggested method/approach and potential partner in implementing future capacity

buildingprogram.


Table9-1 Proposedfuturecapacitybuildingforprojectaffectedpeople/vulnerablepeople

No Proposedactivities Method/Approach Implementer PotentialPartner

I Training/Skilldevelopment

1 FishFarming/Fish

Ponds

Replicationofcurrent

CSRprogramandwhere

possibleimproveto

adjustwiththelocation

anddemand

SEML DinasPertanian,Peternakan,

danPerikanan,KabSolokor

Agriculture,AnimalHusbandry,

andFisheryDinasofSolok

Selatang

2 Agriculture Developandprovide

trainingsongood

agriculturepractices





Selatang

3 Business

Management/Mark

eting

Developandprovide

trainingsonBusiness

Managementand

Marketing

SEML VocationalHighSchool(SMK)1,

CommunityAcademy(AK)

4 KampongChicken

Livestock


CSRprogramandwhere

possibleimproveto


anddemand





Selatan

5 CowLivestock Replicationofcurrent

CSRprogramandwhere

possibleimproveto


anddemand





Selatang

6 Furniture/carpentry Developandprovide

trainingsonfurniture

andcarpentry

SEML DinasofSocial,Transmigration

andWorkforce

(Dinsosnakertrans),Centrefor

WorkTraining(BLK)

7 Sewing/embroidery Replicationofcurrent

CSRprogramandwhere

possibleimproveto


anddemand


andWorkforce


WorkTraining(BLK)

8 Cooking(Tataboga) Developandprovide

trainingsonCooking

(tataboga)


andWorkforce


WorkTraining(BLK),SMK1

9 Hatchery Developandprovide

trainingsonhatchery





Selatang

10 Foodindustry Developandprovide

trainingsonfood

industry


andWorkforce




No Proposedactivities Method/Approach Implementer PotentialPartner

11 Ducklivestock Replicationofcurrent

CSRprogramandwhere

possibleimproveto


anddemand





Selatang

II Capital

1 ProvisionofCapital

forfoodhome

industry


CSRprogramandwhere

possibleimproveto


anddemand


andWorkforce



2 Loan/capitalfor

businesswithout

interest

Developmechanismfor

loan/capitaldistribution,

controlandmonitoring

SEML Localornationalexperienced

NGOsonmicrofinance

III Provisionofgoodsaslivelihoodcapital

1 Provisionofquality

commoditybreeds

andseeds


CSRprogramandwhere

possibleimproveto


anddemand





Selatang

2 Provisionofsewing

machine


CSRprogramandwhere

possibleimproveto


anddemand

SEML -

10 CONCLUSION

Theaimofthisstudywastogatherdataonthesocio-economicprofileofPAHHandtoassess

theirvulnerability.ThePAHHhaveallbeenaffectedbylandacquisitioncarriedoutaspartof

SEML’s project development. Although the landwas designated as area for other use (APL)

ownedby thegovernment, the communityhadbeenusing the landapproximatelyover the

last two decades. SEML recognised the community’use of the land and thus carried out a

properlandacquisitionprocessandfaircompensationbasedonthewillingbuyerwillingseller

principle.

At the time, no detailed socio-economic census survey was carried out. This study now

attemptstofillthisgap,alsocomplementingthestudythathasbeencarriedoutin2015with

75ofthePAHHwhostillresidewithinthering1areaofSEMLprojectareaof influence.It is

noteworthytohighlightthatasinitialbaselinedataisnotavailable,thisstudycannotcoverall

aspects thatareusuallyexamined. Inparticular changeof livelihoodsand incomes following

compensationpaymentsaredifficulttoshow.Thatiswhyavulnerabilityassessmenthasbeen

conducted to identify those households that are at risk and those that are vulnerable,

regardlessofpreviousachievementsandimpacts.

The present survey has covered 133 households who were all affected by SEML land

acquisition.Apart froma socioeconomicprofile and vulnerability assessment, livelihood and


skillsdevelopmentneedsandexpectationsofPAHHandcommunityleadersandlivelihoodand

skills development existing facilities and programs offered by local government and other

educationalfacilitiesandSEMLitselfthroughitsCSRprogramwerealsoexamined.

Anumberof challengeswere facedwhile carryingout the survey, suchas the identification

andlocatingofaffectedhouseholds,thedissatisfactionofhouseholdswiththelandacquisition

process and a corresponding dislike in responding to surveyors’ questions as well as

inadqueacy of enumerators in filling in the requested information, errors in data entry and

subsequentdelaysindataanalysisaswellasdistanceintermsofresidenceofhouseholdsand

arrangeingoffocusgroupdiscussions.

In summary,of the133households,around13.5%havebeen identifiedasmost likely tobe

vulnerablewhile another 14.3% are potentially vulnerable. These households could become

vulnerablewhenasuddenchangeoflifehappens,suchasforexampleanillnessthatprevents

themainbreadwinnertocontinuetoworkorbecomingunemployedforavarietyofreasons.

Whetherthevulnerabilitiesidentifiedaredirectlylinkedtotheamountoflandsold,hasyetto

be confirmed. As indicated earlier, the accuracy of some of the data may be skewed and

baseline data is not available.Nonetheless, it is clear, thatmany households are vulnerable

anddorequirespecialattention.Andsomeofthemostvulnerablehouseholdsalsoappearto

havesoldalargepercentageoftheirland.Thisindicatesthatthecompensationsreceiveddid

notcontributetoabetterandwealthierlive.

The fact that the majority of households has sold between 25 to 75% of their total lands

farmedorownedrevals thatpeoplemayhavehopedfora lifeoutsideof farming.However,

compensation payments were only marginally invested for longterm projects such as

children’seducationandsavingsinthebank,whilethemajoritywasusedforeverydayneeds.

It showsthat there isclearlyaneed for investingmore intopeople’s skillsdevelopmentand

openingupnewemploymentopportunities.

Theresultsofthevariouspartsofthestudyfitwelltogetherandconfirmindividualfindings.

The major issues can be summarised are evolving around education, finance and business

development.Amajor impediment to improvements in farmingskillsare the riskof theftof

livestock thoughwhichmayneed tobe looked into inmoredetailwould suchprogramsbe

considered.ESC/Greencap’srecommendationforfutureimprovementfocusonallofthethree

areasmentionedabove.

A furtherpart lookedat SEML’sexisting stakeholderengagement, currentandpast, and the

satisfaction with the land acquisition process, in particular the working of the grievance

mechanism.Responsetimeisconsideredfastandmostgrievancesarebeingdealtwithtothe

satisfactionof thecommunity, thoughnotallof thecommunity isawareof themechanism.

MostPAHHwerealsosatisfiedwiththelandacquistionprocessandonlyafewfeltnegatively

impacted.

Local employement within SEML is very low. Considering that construction phase has not

started yet, that can become another area of main focus for SEML in looking at ways to


increaselocalparticipation.Theyoungmalepopulationwithloweducationalattainmentmay

be a good target as potential future workforce during construction to build their work

experienceandcapacity.

ItisalsoclearfromthissurveythatSEMLCSRactivitieshavemainlyfocusedonring1villages,

assuchparticipationofPAHHsurveyedinthepresentstudyisratherlow.

AlthoughSouthSolokisanewregencywithlimitedfunds,thereisgreatopportunitytolinkin

with the existing educational programs and collaborate on a number of livelihood and skills

improvementdevelopmentprograms.

11 BIBLIOGRAPHY

ADB, 2012. Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards – A Planning and Implementation Good

PracticeSourcebook–DraftWorkingDocument,

ADB1998.HandbookonResettlement–AGuidetoGoodPractice,

IFC2002.HandbookforPreparingaResettlementActionPlan,

IHS (Inti Hexa Semesta), 2015. Provision of Integrated Social Development Program Study

Services–FinalReport–SkillDevelopmentPlanandLivelihoodOpportunitiesDevelopment

Moret,W.,2014.VulnerabilityAssessmentMethodologies:Areviewoftheliterature

Accessedwebsites:

BadanPusatStatistics(BPS),IndonesiaandSouthSolokRegency


LISTOFAPPENDICES

AppendixI a ListofProjectAffectedHouseholds

b List of Potentially Vulnerable Households invited

toattendFGDs

AppendixII HouseholdSurveyQuestionnaire

AppendixIII KIIAndFGDGuideline

AppendixIV PhotographicEvidenceofFIeldActivities


Appendix I a List of Project Affected Households And Survey Status

b List of Potentially Vulnerable Households to be Invited to FGDs

c List of Identified Vulnerable Households (by survey)


APPENDIXIA-LISTOFPROJECTAFFECTEDHOUSEHOLDSANDSURVEYSTATUS

NoNo

GPSNama Jorong(Kampung) Alamat Pekerjaan

Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

1 119 BAIDARWAR KepalaBukit Bertani M 20823-8728-6146

(no.istri)DONE

2 134 ERNITA KepalaBukit 0852-7451-3986

(erna)DONE

3 135 ALDIZAMRI KepalaBukit DONE

4 136 DASMARIJAL/Elfariza KepalaBukit DONE

5 137 MASRIZAL KepalaBukit DONE

6 109 SUKARNI Kotobaru DONE

7 122 EDIWISRAF Kotobaru kepalajorong M 4 0813-7450-6935 DONE

8 130 YURNALIS Kotobaru petani M 6 0853-7489-9312 DONE

9 150 DONISAPUTRA Kotobaru wiraswasta M 0821-7050-7623

(doni)DONE

10 156 AFRIZALDT.ITAM Kotobaru petani M 0821-6986-6421 DONE

11 79 Nofriadi Lolo

Meninggal,Istri

sudahpindahdan

tidakdiketahui

lokasinya

12 80 DodiPutra(42thn) Lolo wiraswasta M 0813-6375-9500

(dodi)DONE

13 82 Syafrizal Lolo 0852-6600-8610

(syafrizal)DONE

14 102 SopianSoriPinang

Sinawa/Lolo petani M

0812-6618-4466

(sofian)DONE

15 115 EDISUWARNO Lolo DONE

16 154 ZULKARNAINI LubukPeraku Sarapansari wiraswasta M 3 0813-7463-1572 DONE


NoNo


Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

17 120 M.SALIMIN PadangAro DONE

18 95Hengki (42 thn)/Sri

NofriantiPakanRabaa wiraswasta M 4 0853-6463-6501

Tidakada

dirumah,sedang

disolok

19 101 Edward(56thn) PasarMuaraLabuh Pensiunan M 3 0812-6626-569 DONE

20 103 ROSNELI(72thn) PasarMuaraLabuh Iburumah

tanggaF 4

0821-7025-6216

(ibuumi)DONE

21 111 ZAINI(60thn) PasarMuaraLabuh

Batang

Labuh,Nagari

asabarat

wiraswasta M 6 0813-7493-5012 DONE

22 151KOSNEDI YUSDI

(43thn)PasarMuaraLabuh

PasarMuara

LabuhBaratPNSRSUD M 3 0853-7461-2611 DONE

23 104 NOFRIZON PekanSelasaTubo,

TaratakTinggiPetani M 2 0853-7473-9671 DONE

24 112 MASFURIZAL PekanSelasa Jualan M 3 0812-6710-8775 DONE

25 116DARWIS (60 thn) (DT

Panggao)PekanSelasa

DurianTigo

CapangPetani M 5 NA DONE

26 117 HASNULFIKRI(42thn) PekanSelasa petani M 3 0852-7215-3842 DONE

27 118 EDIMIAN/RahmaDeni PekanSelasa dagang M 3 0812-6847-6972 DONE

28 123 DONIP.N PekanSelasa DONE

29 125 ROSNANI(51thn) PekanSelasa wiraswasta F 3 0823-8340-0708 DONE

30 143KHAIRUL AMRI (48

thn)PekanSelasa Petani M 3 0812-7599-9947 DONE

31 148 IRWANTOSAHPUTRA PekanSelasa DONE

32 149 YERISANDRIO(36thn) PekanSelasa wiraswasta M 2 0812-6737-0979 DONE

33 153 ELIMURNI(55thn) PekanSelasa GuruSMP F 4 0813-7416-0395 DONE


NoNo


Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

(suami)

34 90 ZahariWahyudi(45thn) Pekonina Dagangdan

taniM 3 0852-7243-7322

Tidak bisa

dihubungi

35 94 Osriado/Sulastri PinangAwan M 3 0823-8966-4337 DONE

36 144 SUARDI PinangAwan 0812-6636-2472 DONE

37 93 Orfitwandri/Efrida PinangSinawa petani M 2 0852-7231-6559 DONE

38 97 Ediarianto/samsiDewi PinangSinawa M 0852-7118-4146 DONE

39 126 CANDRAD PinangSinawa Petani M 3 0823-9032-8155 DONE

40 128 ARDISON PinangSinawa DONE

41 133SYAIFUL ARFAN (54

thn)PinangSinawa

pegawaikantor

camatM 6 0852-7823-3691 DONE

42 91Burahman (53

thn)/MulhandriPulakek PNS M 2 0813-7463-1171 DONE

43 76Yusra (40thn)

/YulmetraSako kontraktor M 3 0812-6608-7581 DONE

44 139 ANASRIL Sei.Durian SudahMeninggal

45 141 M.ZEN/Istri Sijunjung/Pekonina DONE

46 138 ARMENSIS Sipotu DONE

47 142 SYAHRIAL Sipotu DONE

48 147 JALALUDIN(65thn) Sipotu Petani M 0823-8469-7003 DONE

49 78 Hasran/DeriHasnan Sipotu DONE

50 84 NofriEfendi TaratakBukareh honorersatpol

PPM 2 0853-3541-5370 DONE

51 85 Herdi/EmraYelfi TaratakBukareh petani M 3 0812-6686-0268 DONE

52 89 AhmadTarmizi(43thn) TaratakBukareh pedagang M 5 0823-8209-1566 DONE


NoNo


Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

53 89Giri Indah Purta

(26thn)TaratakBukareh kontraktor M 0813-7489-3701 DONE

54 131 ZULNASRI(60thn) TaratakBukareh pedagang M 0852-7414-1150 DONE

55 155 HERMANANDIKA TaratakTinggi DONE

56 99 RomiYantito/Nefrida UjungJalan petani M 40852-6335-5931

(zia,adik)DONE

57 108 HIDAYATI UjungJalan petani F 2 DONE

58 129 AFRIWANDI UjungJalan supirtruk M DONE

59 132 DIANAYURSYAH UjungJalan petani F 4 0821-7035-1093 DONE

60 152 AFRINALDI UjungJalan perawat DONE

61 Syafrial PinangSinawa Petani M 0852-6364-5535 DONE

62 90a Erwin(44thn) Pekonina M 2 0821-7466-9626 DONE

63 Anizar KampungBaru DONE

64 Yulison

tidak

diketemukan

lokasinya

65 Baharrudin KampungBaru DONE

66 SyamsulAnwar/Yeni TaratakTinggi DONE

67 Syafrudin, Meitina,

LidiaPutri, DONE

68 Darlis/Misnawati TaratakTinggi DONE

69 Wilyedi TaratakTinggi DONE

70 Sahabir KampungBaru DONE

71 dediindra KampungBaru DONE

72 nurjani/Arisafrianto KampungBaru DONE


NoNo


Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

73 Ngatijok

anak di padang,

tidakdiketahuino

kontaknya

74 Ngatiman DONE

75 Tukiran Pekonina DONE

76 Maruli TaratakTinggi DONE

77 Agusman TaratakTinggi DONE

78 Embriadi Mandaro

(Embri)KampungBaru

Tidakada

dirumah

79 Tasril KampungBaru DONE

80 MilPatra/AdeBeno DONE

81 Halnedi KampungBaru DONE

82 Kudun (Syafrizal

Makudun)KampungBaru DONE

83 MasrialMalano TaratakTinggi DONE

84 Kasmir TaratakTinggi DONE

85 Muliadi KampungBaru DONE

86 Nasrul PinangSinawa DONE

87 Armas PasarPakanSalasa 0812-6636-2472 DONE

88 JendriNedi Lolo 82390163025 DONE

89 Muhamadyulis TaratakBukareh Petani DONE

90 JoniHartono GOR/Pekonina DONE

91 Irsyad TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

92 RomiSyahputra TaratakBukareh Wiraswasta Herdi0812-6686- DONE


NoNo


Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

0268

93 Syaifullah TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

94 NewinKoprin TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

95 Yasri TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

96 ErsisWirmansyah TaratakBukareh Wiraswasta Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

97 Firdaus TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

98 Nelson TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

99 ZefriMaindra TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

100 EdoJatiJaya TaratakBukareh Pegawai

Swasta

Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

101 MediGandra TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

102 Anwar TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

103 Muhamad Zaini

ZakariaTaratakBukareh Wiraswasta

Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

104 RamadhanTanjungTaratak

Bukareh Petani

Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE

105 Usman TaratakBukareh Petani Herdi0812-6686-

0268DONE


NoNo


Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

106 Roni Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

107 Dedi Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

108 DodiSalfari Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500

SudahPindahdan

tidakdiketahui

lokasinya

109 Doni(Safrijoni) Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

110 EpiLasrianto Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

111 Gupran Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

112 Ijan Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

113 MulyadiS Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

114 Zainal(Dt.Talanan) Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

115 Suwarmen Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

116 Darul Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

117 Syahril/Jangbogor Lolo Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

118 JangPilin SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE


NoNo


Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

119 AyahnyaHAM SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

120 Muid SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

121 EdiMando SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-

9500DONE

122 SimanT/Sasmiwarti PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

123 Syahri(Amris) PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

124 Arizal PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

125 CondriDarson PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

126 Asdin PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

127 Febrinaldi PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

128 MetraOktavia/Yurnalis PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

129 Dian PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

130 Desmawati/Riki PinangSinawa EdiArianto:0852-

7118-4146DONE

131 Jalinus Tarataktinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE

132 ALHadi TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE

133 Asril TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE


NoNo


Jenis

Kelamin

Jumlah

Anggota

keluarga

NoTelp Status

134 Suklirman TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE

135 Yunadi TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi DONE

136 Hermanto/daraman

bengkePasiaTalang

Sec

Waterboom DONE

137 Syam Syahril (syam

milis)PinangSinawa DONE

138 Hendra Alai Yusra DONE

139 Nasrul LoloKaciak Yusra DONE

140 Yulmetra SungaiTalu Yusra DONE

141 Dasril LoloKaciak Yusra DONE

142 TafifRedi AlaiSako Yusra DONE

143 DediSuhendra AlaiSako Yusra DONE


APPENDIXIB-LISTOFPOTENTIALLYVULNERABLEHOUSEHOLDSTOBEINVITEDTOFGDS

No NamaRespondenSurvey Jorong(Kampung) Alamat NoTelp PesertaFGDStatusdi

Keluarga

Jenis

Kelamin

Peserta

Umur

PesertaAlasan/CriteriaPesertaFGD NamaKelompok

1ALDIZAMRI KepalaBukit Netriyenti Istri P 44

Perempuan 15-64 th/SD/tidak tamat SD/ Tidak

Kerja;TamatSD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan

2M.SALIMIN PadangAro Yuliarti Anak P 31


Kerja;SD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan

3nurjani/Arisafrianto KampungBaru Desmayeni Anak P 27 TidaktamatSD/IbuRumahTangga KelompokPerempuan

4MasrialMalano TaratakTinggi DaniRumantik Istri P 30 TamatSD/IbuRumahTangga KelompokPerempuan

5Muliadi KampungBaru Isas Istri P 43


Kerja:TamatSD/ObuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan

6Zainal(Dt.Talanan) Lolo Dody0813-6375-9501 Nurmis(Nurimis), Istri P 55


Kerja;SD/IbuRumahTangga;KelompokPerempuan

7JangPilin(Sapril) SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-9501 nurlaili Istri P 58



8EdiMando SawahSiluwak Dody0813-6375-9501 EliMurni Istri P 40 TamatSD/IbuRumahTangga; KelompokPerempuan

9MetraOktavia/Yurnalis PinangSinawa

EdiArianto:0852-7118-

4148Helmaini Anak P 36



10Asril TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi Elfiza Istri P 37



11

ARMENSIS sipotu yurmaningsih Istri P 44


Kerja; Tamat SLTP/Keahlian Menjahit/Ibu Rumah

Tangga

KelompokPerempuan

12

Muhamadyulis taratakbukareh nurjulis Istri P 56

Perempuan15-64th/SD/tidaktamatSD/IbuRumah

Tangga/ Tidak Kerja; Tamat SD/Keahlian buat

makanankueh2goranganpecal,dll;

KelompokPerempuan

13nurjani/Arisafrianto KampungBaru Nurjani Istri P 50 PerempuanKK KelompokPerempuan

14Erwin(44thn) Pekonina KampungBaru 0821-7466-9627 partiyum Istri P 36 Perempuan15-64th/SD/tidaktamatSD/TidakKerja KelompokPerempuan

15Baharrudin(ALM) KampungBaru Nurhidayati Anak P 45 Perempuan15-64th/SD/tidaktamatSD/TidakKerja KelompokPerempuan

16Ngatiman Pekonina Surmi Istri P 64

Usia LanjutAnak ada yang Gangguan Jiwadr kecil,

lantaipapankayuKelompokPerempuan

17ARDISON pinangsinawa Ardison L 45 Pendapatanrendah KelompokLelaki

18ERNITA KepalaBukit 0852-7451-3986(erna) Ardi KK L 44

Pendapatan rendah Rp. 85,000/dibawah garis

kemiskinanKelompokLelaki

19 Nasrul PinangSinawa Nasrul L 65 SulitBaca/TamatSD/KerjaKelompokLelaki

20JendriNedi lolo 82390163025 Jendri L 34

Untang untuk modal usaha 1 juta dari 25jt,

pendapatan1,2jt;KelompokLelaki

21Zainal(Dt.Talanan) lolo Dody0813-6375-9500 Zainal L 58 KelompokLelaki

22SyamSyahril(syammilis) pinangsinawa Syam L 68 TertulisdiSPSSRp.666,667/bulan KelompokLelaki

23Suklirman TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi Sukirman L 60 PendapatanRendah KelompokLelaki

24DediSuhendra AlaiSako Yusra DediSuhendra L 47 PendapatanrendahRp600rb/bulan KelompokLelaki



Keluarga

Jenis

Kelamin

Peserta

Umur


25Yusra(40thn)/Yulmetra

JorongAlaiNagarisako

Selatan 0812-6608-7581 Yusra L 40 utanguntukkebutuhanharian KelompokLelaki

26

KOSNEDIYUSDI(43thn) pasarmuaralabuhpasarmuara

labuhbarat0853-7461-2611 KosnediYusdi L 44

Utanguntuk rumahdanmobildari koperasi cicil 2jt

dari 150jt (income 4,6jt); yang tertulis di SPSS

Rp.920,000

KelompokLelaki

27

CANDRADarson pinangsinawa

JoSungai

Durian,Nagari

Bomas

0823-9032-8155 Candra L 32Utanguntukusahaitik300rbperbulandari10jtdari

PNPM(income4,8jt);TertulisdiSPSSRp.960,000KelompokLelaki

28ROSNANI(51thn) pekanselasa 0823-8340-0709 Auzan Anak L 20

Tidak sekolah/SD tidak tamat/bukan KK/dibawah

30th/bekerjaataudirumah;KelompokPemuda

29M.SALIMIN PadangAro Musfir Anak L 25



30ELIMURNI(55thn) pekanselasa

0813-7416-0395

(suami)Aris Anak L 22



31Anizar KampungBaru Hendaka Anak L 20


30th/bekerjaataudirumah;WorkingKelompokPemuda

32Baharrudin(ALM) KampungBaru Busra Anak L 30



33Suklirman TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Yose Anak L 26



34nurjani/Arisafrianto KampungBaru Afdar Anak L 25



35Kasmir(ALM)

Taratak Tinggi

(KampupngBaru) RahmatFauzi Anak L 24 Pengangguran,mencarikerja KelompokPemuda

36EdoJatiJaya taratakbukareh Herdi0812-6686-0268 EdoJatiJaya Anak L 21

pengangguran, terbatas karena ijazah, syalfitri

(KK)sakitleherKelompokPemuda

37Agusman TaratakTinggi RioNofianto Anak L 17 Kurangdanauntukmelanjutkansekolah KelompokPemuda

38ErsisWirmansyah taratakbukareh Herdi0812-6686-0268

Ersis W (Anak

Syafrial)Anak L 28


30th/bekerjaataudirumah;KeahlianMainGitarKelompokPemuda

39M.SALIMIN PadangAro Yusmarni Anak P 28



40Jalinus Tarataktinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi Afridayanti Anak P 25 Pengangguran KelompokPemuda

41Jalinus Tarataktinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi

MitriWulandari, 21

yr.Anak P 21 Pengangguran KelompokPemuda

42SyamSyahril(syammilis) pinangsinawa YuldaAfni, Anak P 20 Pengangguran,belumdapatkerja KelompokPemuda

43DediIndra KampungBaru

Unknown Istri P

PendapatanrendahKelompokPerempuan

44Dasril

Alai,NagariSako

Selatan(LoloKaciak) Dasril

L

utanguntukkebutuhanharian KelompokLelaki

45Febrinaldi PinangSinawa

EdiArianto:0852-7118-

4146Febrinaldi

L

UtanguntukbeliObat KelompokLelaki

46Orfitwandri/Efrida pinangsinawa

0852-7231-6559 Orfitwandri/Efrida

L AtapJerami KelompokLelaki

47SopianSori PinangSinawa/lolo

0812-6618-4466

(sofian)SopianSori

L

Utanguntukpendidikan KelompokLelaki

48Tukiran Pekonina

Hesi Istri P 50



49JoniHartono GOR/Pekonina

ernawati Istri P 30 TamatSD/IbuRumahTangga; KelompokPerempuan



Keluarga

Jenis

Kelamin

Peserta

Umur


50Syafrial PinangSinawa

0852-6364-5536 YurliS, Istri P 51


Kerja:TamatSD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan

51

Ayah nya HAM (Katiak

Samu)SawahSiluwak

Dody0813-6375-9501 Nurhayati Istri P 58


Kerja;SD/IbuRumahTangga;KelompokPerempuan

52Suklirman TaratakTinggi BukiiBulek Farmaidi M.Nakli Anak L 28



53Tasril KampungBaru

Warnatis Istri P 52


Kerja:SD/IbuRumahTanggaKelompokPerempuan

54MuhamadZainiZakaria taratakbukareh

Herdi0812-6686-0269 Rosmawati Istri P 55


Kerja;SD/Lainlainkeahliahmenjahit; KelompokPerempuan


Table11-1 ProjectAffectedHouseholdsandvillagesthatwereidentifiedasvulnerable.

PAHH

No Livein Respondent1 StatusR1 AgeR1 SexR1 Respondent2 StatusR2 AgeR2 SexR2 NameHeadofHH

34 padangaro salmin 1 66 1 dermala 2 65 2 salmin

54 pinangsinawa sahrul 1 65 1 nursam 2 60 2 sahrul

75 tarataktinggi sukirman 1 60 1 sariana 2 54 2 sukirman

83 tarataktinggi agusman 1 42 1 desniyenti 2 30 2 agusman

97 sungaidurianchandra

darson1 32 1 evi 2 30 2 chandradarson

107 kampungbaru nurjani 2 50 2 desmayeni 3 27 2 nurjani

7 pinangsinawa syaifularfan 1 54 1 almawati 2 52 2 syaifularfan

18 mudiaklolo jendri 1 34 1 santimulya 34 2 jendri

19 lolo zainal 1 58 1 nurmis 2 55 2 zainal

68 pinangsinawa syamsyahril 1 68 1 ramilis 2 68 2 syamsyahril

115 pasarmuaralabuh koesnedy 1 44 1 nuriah 2 39 2 koesnedy

1 alai suhendradedi 1 47 1 nabila 2 40 2 dedisuhendra

3 kepalabukit ardi 1 44 1 ernita 2 43 2 ardi

10 kampungbaru indradedi 1 38 1 hasnawati 2 33 2 indradedi

21 lolo doni 1 30 1 rina 2 28 2 doni

44 pinangsinawa sahrul 1 75 1 nursam 2 60 2 sahrul

78 tarataktinggi zainal 1 60 1 dahlina 2 55 2 zainal

112 lolo ijan 3 24 1 zainak 1 58 2 zainal

24 taratakbukareh syafril 1 55 1 Syamsiar 2 49 2 Syafril

30 taratakbukareh irsyad 1 60 1 elimurni 2 50 2 irsyad

35 taratakbukareh dasrial 1 57 1 muhitah 2 56 2 dasrial

62 matoaia muid 1 50 1 fasniati 2 45 2 muid

69 taratakbukareh yasri 1 43 1 weri 2 40 2 yasri

70 pekonina tukiran 1 63 1 hesi 2 50 2 tukiran

71 taratakbukareh elimurni 2 56 2 masni 1 60 1 masni

72 kampungbaru erwin 1 44 1 partiyum 2 36 2 erwin

77 tarataktinggi nuar 1 50 1 jalinus 2 40 2 nuar

82 kampungbaru almbaharudin 1 75 1 syaribanun 3 39 2 almbaharudin

89 taratakbukareh edo 3 21 1syahyuni

yendni2 42 2 syalfitri

98 ujungjalanromi

syahputra1 31 1 maisatulfitria 2 29 2 romisyahputra

102 tarataktinggimasrial

malano1 35 1 deniromantik 2 30 2 masrialmalano

103 pinangawan satiudin 1 59 1 meltina 2 56 2 satiudin

105 pekonina surmi 1 64 2 adihermawan 3 27 1 surmi

106 kampungbaru jonihartono 1 32 1 ernawati 2 30 2 jonihartono

113 mudiaklolobarat mulyadis 1 45 1 titisumarni 2 36 2 mulyadis

127Bariangrawo-

rowoyurnalis 1 55 1 yulharnet 2 50 2 yurnalis

129 taratakbukareh nelson 1 55 1 navalma 2 50 2 nelson

50156-001: Muara Laboh Geothermal Power Project

Documents

Transcript of 50156-001: Muara Laboh Geothermal Power Project