5 Paris Convention

download 5 Paris Convention

of 30

Transcript of 5 Paris Convention

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    1/30

    Protection of industrial

    property in the pastand today

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    2/30

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    3/30

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    4/30

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    5/30

    Paris convention for the

    Protection of IndustrialProperty

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    6/30

    Revisions of the Paris Convention

    20.03.1883

    1900 Brussels

    1911 Washington 1925 Hague

    1934 London

    1958 Lisbon 1967 Stockholm

    28.09.1979

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    7/30

    Paris Convention

    Patents

    Utility models

    Industrial design Trademarks

    Service marks

    Trade names Indication of source

    Appelletion of origin

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    8/30

    General rule of ParisConvention:

    National treatment of otherconvention members citizens in

    the field of the protection of their

    industrial property

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    9/30

    art.2

    1. Nationals of any country of the Union shall, as regards

    the protection of industrial property, enjoy in all the othercountries of the Union the advantages that their respectivelaws now grant, or may hereafter grant, to nationals; allwithout prejudice to the rights specially provided for by thisConvention.Consequently, they shall have the same protection as thelatter, and the same legal remedy against any infringementof their rights, provided that the conditions and formalitiesimposed upon nationals are complied with.

    2. However, no requirement as to domicile orestablishment in the country where protection is claimedmay be imposed upon nationals of countries of the Unionfor the enjoyment of any industrial property rights.

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    10/30

    Rights under art.2

    Gives same rights concerning protection of IPas the country they are visiting provides fortheir nationals

    Will give same rights in the future Same legal protection

    Same legal remedies

    + extra rights given by the Paris Convention No requirement as to the domicile may be

    imposed for the enjoyment of any industrialprotection rights

    To the countries of the Union

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    11/30

    Whom does Paris convention

    protect

    Nationals of the other states of the Union (art.2)

    Nationals of the countries outside the Unionif:

    Effective industrial establishement

    Effective commecial establishement

    is situated in the territory ot one of the

    countries of the Union (art. 3)

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    12/30

    Winner takes it all

    AlexanderGraham Bell invented the telephone in 1876. The first words hespoke on his telephone were, "Watson, come here. I need you." Watsonwas his assistant's name.

    That happened in 1875-76. However Antonio Meucci had a workingtelephone since 1848 in Havana and a perfected model by 1871. On

    that year Meucci filed for and obtained a patent for the telephone.Meucci could not afford the $250 needed for a definitive patent for his"talking telegraph" so in 1871 filed a one-year renewable notice of animpending patent. Three years later he could not even afford the $10 torenew it.

    He sent a model and technical details to the Western Union telegraphcompany but failed to win a meeting with executives. When he asked

    for his materials to be returned, in 1874, he was told they had been lost.Two years later Bell, who shared a laboratory with Meucci, filed apatent for a telephone, became a celebrity and made a lucrative dealwith Western Union.

    Meucci sued and was nearing victory - the supreme court agreed to hearthe case and fraud charges were initiated against Bell - when theFlorentine died in 1889. The legal action died with him.

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    13/30

    Right of precedence

    Art. 4

    Everyone who correctly filed an application for

    patent (or his succesor) in one state will havea right of precedence in other states of theunion before anyone other wanting toapplicate for the patent.

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    14/30

    What kind of filling gives rise

    to the right of priority?

    Any filling (done accordingly to the rule of

    law) equivalent to regular national filling or

    filling equivalent to filling under international

    treaties concluded between the countries of

    the Union.

    Equivalent to regular national filling

    Regular national filling (giving date) Equivalent to international treaties

    Regular international treaties filling (giving date)

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    15/30

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    16/30

    How long is priority rule

    effective?

    12 months patents and utility models

    6 months industrial designs, trade marks

    The term start from the date of filling theapplication.

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    17/30

    Idependence of obtained

    patents

    Patents obtained in different countries of theUnion are independent from each other.

    Error Lack of payment

    Expiration

    Effects only in one country not in all.

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    18/30

    Industrial property rights fees

    Depending on national legislation

    Not less than 6 months extra time for

    payment

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    19/30

    Compulsory License

    Forfeiture of patent

    Compulsory license

    This method can not be used forfaiture of

    the rights from the industrial designs

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    20/30

    Actions not infringementing

    the rights of patentee

    Use on board of vessels of other countries ofdevices subject to patent in the body,

    machinery, tackle, gear or other accesories ifsuch vessel temporary enters the waters ofthe countries of the Union

    Use of devieces subject to patent on

    airplanes or land vehicles if those vehiclestemporarly or incidentally enter the countriesof the Union

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    21/30

    Well known marks (art. 6 bis)

    Well known marks are being protected exofficio (it domestic law allows it) or on requestof interested party in all countries of theUnion

    Protection:

    Cancellation

    Refusal

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    22/30

    Imitations of well known marks

    Reproduction

    Imitation

    TranslationLiable to create confusion with the mark

    considered by the authority to be a well

    known mark.

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    23/30

    Time for cancellation the

    imitations of well known marks

    5 years from the date of registration

    No time limits if the mark was registered or

    used in bad faith.

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    24/30

    Registration of trademarks

    Conditions for filling the registration aredepending from the countries internallegislation

    Registration can not be refused on theground that filling registration (or renewal)has not been effected in the country of origin

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    25/30

    Assignement of mark

    If the law of member state states that atrademark may be assigned only if it takesplace in the same time and with the transferof business to which the mark belongs it shellbe enough for the validity of suchaddignement that the portion of business

    located in that country be transfered to thenew owner of the trademark.

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    26/30

    Protection of trademark allready

    registered in one country in other

    countries

    Every mark accepted for registration incountry of origin should be accepted for

    registration in the other

    Exceptions:

    Infringes rights acquired by third parties

    Are indistinctive in its character Are contrary to morality or public order

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    27/30

    Service marks, Trade names

    A trade name, also known as a trading name or abusiness name, is the name which a businesstrades under for commercial purposes, although itsregistered, legal name, used for contracts and other

    formal situations, may be another. Pharmaceuticalsalso have trade names (e.g. "Aspirin"), oftendissimilar to their chemical names ("acetylsalicylicacid").

    A service mark differs from a trademark in that the

    mark is used on the advertising of the service ratherthan on the packaging or delivery of the service,since there is generally no "package" to place themark on, which is the practice for trademarks.Transportation carriers would paint their service

    marks on their vehicles, such as on planes or buses

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    28/30

    Service marks, trade names

    Are being protected by the convention

    There is no need of registration of such

    marks

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    29/30

    Goods unlawfully Bearing a

    Mark orTrade Name

    Seizure on importation

    Prohibition of importation

    Civil remedies and actions

  • 8/3/2019 5 Paris Convention

    30/30

    International invention

    competitions orexhibitions