5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

download 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

of 27

Transcript of 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    1/27

    CHAPTER-5

    RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

    5.1 Ratio Analysis

    Ratio analysis is one of the techniques to evaluate the financial condition and

    performance of a business concern. Simply, ratio means the comparison of one figure

    to other relevant figure or figures. Ratio analysis is the fundamental analysis of anycompany. It has so many advantages and helps to find out the following things.

    1. To workout the profitability2. To workout the solvency3. Helpful in analysis of financial statement4. Helpful in comparative analysis of the performance5. To simplify the accounting information6. To workout the operating efficiency7. To workout short-term financial position8. Helpful for forecasting purposes

    There are mainly six types of ratios. These are Liquidity ratio, profitability ratio,

    management efficiency ratio, operating ratio, cash flow ratioand investment ratio.

    5.1.1 Liquidity Ratio

    Current Ratio

    The current ratio is a popular financial ratio used to test a company's liquidity driving

    the proportion of current assets available to cover current liabilities.The concept

    behind this ratio is to ascertain whether a company's short-term assets (cash,

    cash equivalents, marketable securities, receivables and inventory) are readily

    available to pay off its short-term liabilities (notes payable, current portion of term

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    2/27

    debt bles, accrued expenses and taxes). In t eory, t e hi herthe current ratio, the

    better.

    Formul

    Y r 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Current

    Ratio

    5.01 3.27 3.21 2.65 2.56

    able 5.1 CurrentRatio

    Fi ure 5.1 CurrentRatio

    Interpretation

    1. The company is maintaining current ratio more than 2 which is good.2. As the companys current assets can be quickly converted in cash so it should

    not keep current assets more than 3. More the current assets, the profit will be

    less.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Current Ratio

    CurrentRatio

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    3/27

    3. As the companys inventory has quick liquidity, current ratio is moresignificantthan quick ratio forthis company.

    QuickRatio

    The quick ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the current ratio by

    measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there are to cover current

    liabilities. The quick ratio is more conservative than the current ratio because it

    excludes inventory and other current assets, which are more difficultto turn into cash.

    Therefore, a higher ratio means a more liquid current position.

    Formula

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Quick

    Ratio

    4.51 2.99 2.96 2.46 2.39

    Table 5.2 QuickRatio

    Figure 5.2 QuickRatio

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    5

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    QuickRatio

    QuickRatio

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    4/27

    Interpretation

    1. The companys quick ratio is more than 2, it shows the companys healthyfinancial position.

    2. Company has good liquidity.3. It can meetthe short term stress with no stress.4. As the difference in current ratio and quick ratio is less, so companys

    inventory managementis very good. And the companys current assets are not

    dependent on inventory.

    5. In previous years it has maintained quick ratio more than 4 also, which is thereason ofless profit.

    Debt E uity Ratio

    The debt equity ratio compares a company's total liabilities to its total share holders

    equity. This is a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders, creditors and obligors

    have committed to the company versus whatthe shareholders have committed.

    Formula:

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Debt

    Equity

    Ratio (%)

    16.1 18.12 30.98 43.11 39.87

    Table 5.3 Debt Equity Ratio

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    5/27

    Figure5.3 Debt Equity Ratio

    Interpretation

    1. Companys debt equity ratio is less than 50%, which is not good.2. Forthe less debt equity ratio the company ROE is less.3. It shows companys inefficient fund management.4. Though itis increasing, butin very slow manner.5. The company is taking minimum risk.

    5.1.2 Profitability Ratio

    Return on E uity

    This ratio indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its net income toits

    average shareholders' equity. Thereturn on equity ratio (ROE) measures how much

    the shareholders earned for their investment in the company. The higher the ratio

    percentage, the more efficient managementis in utilizing its equity base and the better

    return is to investors.

    Formula

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Debt E uity Ratio

    Debt Equity Ratio

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    6/27

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    R E (%) 8.79 6.82 12.23 8.72 12.20

    Table 5.4 Return on Equity

    Figure 5.4 Return on Equity

    Interpretation

    1. Average R E is less than 10%, which is bad enough.2. It should gain 15% R E to show its good performance.3. In the new projects in should utili e the maximum debt.4. It is maintaining huge amount of working capital. It should reduce the working

    capital and invest in some long term to get more profit.

    5. Share holders money is not efficiently employed.

    Return on Assets

    This ratio indicates how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. The return

    on assets (R A) ratio illustrates how well management is employing the company's

    total assets to make a profit. The higher the return, the more efficient management is

    in utili ing its asset base. The R A ratio is calculated by comparing net income to

    average total assets, and is expressed as a percentage.

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    ROE (%)

    ROE ( )

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    7/27

    Formula:

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    ROA (%) 9.93 6.76 13.63 9.66 12.32

    Table 5.5 Return on Assets

    Figure 5.5Return on Assets

    Interpretation

    1. As itis a production company it has to maintain large amount of assets for itsoperation. Stillits average ROA is more than 11% which is very good.

    2. The good ROA is showing efficient utilization of assets.Return on CapitalEmployed

    The return on capital employed (ROCE) ratio, expressed as a percentage,

    complements the return on equity (ROE) ratio by adding a company's debt liabilities,

    or funded debt, to equity to reflect a company's total "capital employed". This

    measure narrows the focus to gain a better understanding of a company's ability to

    generate returns from its available capital base.

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    ROA (%)

    ROA

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    8/27

    Formula

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    ROCE 7.27 6.09 12.36 8.83 11.17

    Table 5.6 Return on Capital Employed

    Figure 5.6 Return on Capital employed

    Interpretation

    1. Companys average ROCE is less than 10, which shows companys inabilityto generate profit from the employed capital.

    2. Though the companys borrowing cost is less than 8%, but its ROCE is lessthan ROE. It shows the inefficient capital budgeting.

    3. Itis because of keeping so much money in shortterm unnecessarily.Operating Profit Margin

    Operating profit margin analysis is to detect consistency or positive/negative trends in

    a company's earnings. Positive profit margin analysis translates into positive

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    200

    -06 2006-0 200 -08 2008-0 200 -10

    ROCE

    ROCE

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    9/27

    investment quality. To a large degree, it is the quality, and growth, of a company's

    earnings that drive its stock price.

    Formula

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    OPM (%) 38.84 34.38 42.79 22.82 32.05

    Table 5.7 Operating Profit Margin

    Figure 5.7 Operating Profit Margin

    Interpretation

    1.

    Companys OPM is more than 34% which is very good.2. To increase companys return, it should increase the sell by reaching the

    maximum limit of mining oflignite and by producing more power.

    5.1.3 Management Efficiency Ratio

    Inventory Turnover Ratio

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    OPM (%)

    OP

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    10/27

    The inventory turnover ratiomeasures the number of times a company sells its

    inventory during the year. A high inventory turnover ratioindicated that the product is

    selling well and vice versa.Inventory Turnover Ratio = cost of goods sold / average inventory.

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Inventory TO

    ratio

    6.17 5.24 6.67 6.82 7.93

    Table 5.8 Inventory Turnover Ratio

    Figure 5.8 Inventory Turnover Ratio

    Interpretation

    1. Companys inventory turnover ratio is more than 6%, which shows thatcompany is selling its product very well.

    2. The company has good inventory management3. As the raw material for power production is readily available, so the company

    can decrease the inventory and increase more inventory turnover ratio. It will

    result more profit.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    2005-06 2006 -07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Inventory TO ratio

    Inventory TO ratio

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    11/27

    5.1.4 Operating Performan e Ratio

    Value Added per Employee

    It simply measures the amount of value added that is (sales-raw materials-outsiders

    services)/total no of employee.

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Value added/

    employee (in Rs)

    1036468 1090907 1276836 1218369 1844515

    Table 5.9 Value Added/ Employee (in Rs)

    Figure 5.9 Value Added/ Employee (in Rs)

    Interpretation

    1. Companys value added/employee is good enough.2. It indicates the good human resource management.3. Companys operating performance is high.

    0

    200000

    400000

    600000

    800000

    1000000

    1200000

    1400000

    1600000

    1800000

    2000000

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Val e a e / em loyee (i s)

    Value added/ employee

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    12/27

    5.1.5 Cash Flow Indi ator RatioDividend Payout Ratio

    This ratio identifies the percentage of earnings (net income) allocated to pay

    cash dividends to shareholders.

    Formula

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Dividend

    Payout Ratio

    (%)

    46.83 30.92 33.28 40.89 26.88

    Table 5.10 Dividend Payout Ratio

    Figure 5.10 Dividend Payout Ratio

    Interpretation

    1. The dividend payout ratio is very less. It distracts the investors.

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Dividend Payout Ratio(%)

    Dividend Payout Ratio

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    13/27

    2. As the company has more amount of money, needed for operation andmaintenance it should pay much more dividend

    5.1.6 Investment RatioA stock's dividend yield is expressed as an annual percentage and is calculated as the

    company's annual cash dividend per share divided bythe current price ofthe stock.

    Formula:

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    DividendYield (%)

    4.20 2.52 3.72 3.57 3.25

    Table 5.11 Dividend Yield

    Figure 5.11 Dividend Yield

    Interpretation

    1. The dividend yield is very poor. The investors are getting only 3-4% return ontheir hand.

    2. It wont attractthe investors who depend on the return of share.

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Dividend Yield( )

    Dividend Yield(%)

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    14/27

    5.2 Wor ing Capital Management

    Working capital is a financial metric which represents operating liquidity available to

    a business, organi ation, or other entity, including governmental entity. Along with

    fixed assets such as plant and equipment, working capital is considered a part of

    operating capital. Net working capital is calculated as current assets minus current

    liabilities. If current assets are less than current liabilities, an entity has a working

    capital deficiency, also called a working capital deficit.

    Net Working Capital = Current Assets Current Liabilities

    Statement of urrent assets

    (Rs in rore)

    Current Assets 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Inventories 358.45 455.59 448.05 535.85 502.96

    Sundry Debtors 168.34 89.41 218.83 781.44 1611.62

    Cash And Bank

    Balance

    2549.12 4253.06 4749.56 5452.20 4823.61

    OtherCurrent Assets 202.85 232.52 159.67 189.47 164.56

    Loans And Advance 337.64 367.61 307.64 598.11 581.59

    Total Current Assets 3616.40 5398.09 5883.75 7557.07 7684.36

    Table 5.12 Statement ofCurrent Assets

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    15/27

    Figure 5.12 Total Current Assets

    Statement of urrent liabilities

    (Rs in rore)

    Current liabilities 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Sundry creditors 246.32 258.64 439.68 734.16 1175.70

    Work in progress 92.75 418.76 486.65 471.41 426.60

    Other liabilities 254.75 559.26 539.63 454.13 296.21

    Mine closure 0.00 0.00 0.00 399.2 491.40

    Provision 146.33 416.62 368.08 792.66 613.28

    Total Current

    liabilities

    740.15 1653.28 1834.04 2851.56 3003.19

    Table 5.13 Statement ofCurrent Liabilities

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Total rre t ssets

    Total Current Assets

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    16/27

    Figure 5.13 Total Current Liabilities

    Figure 5.14 Sundry Debtors & Sundry Creditors

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    000

    500

    3000

    3500

    005-06 006-07 007-08 008-09 009-10

    TotalCurrent liabilities

    Total Current liabilities

    0

    00

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1

    00

    1400

    1600

    1800

    005-06

    006-07

    007-08

    008-09

    009-10

    Sundry Debtors

    Sundry creditors

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    17/27

    Net Working Capital

    (Rs in crore)

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Total Current Assets 3616.40 5398.09 5883.75 7557.07 7684.36

    Total Currentliabilities 740.15 1653.28 1834.04 2851.56 3003.19

    Net Working capital 2876.25 3744.81 4049.71 4705.51 4681.17

    Table 5.14 Net Working Capital

    Figure5.15 Net Working Capital

    Interpretation

    1. Total current assets are increasing with the increase of currentliabilities.2. Net working capitalis increasing exceptin the year 2009-10.3. Sundry debtor and sundry creditor both a/c are increasing. Butthe percentage

    ofincrease in debtoris more than the creditor. The company should manage

    the sundry debtor efficiently.

    4. The cash and bank balance ofthe company show the good liquidity position ofthe company.

    5. Though the sales are increasing butthe company is maintaining the sameinventory level, which shows companys good inventory management.

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Total Current Assets

    Total Currentliabilities

    Net Working capital

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    18/27

    2pages

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    19/27

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    20/27

    Figure 5.16 CF from operating activities

    Figure 5.17 CF from investing activities

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    CF from o erati g a tivities

    CF from operating

    activities

    -1500

    -1000

    -500

    0

    500

    1000

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    CF from investing a tivities

    CF from investment

    activities

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    21/27

    Figure 5.18 CF from financing activities

    Figure 5.19 Net cash inflow

    -1000

    -800

    -600

    -400

    -200

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    CF from fi a i g a tivities

    CF from financing

    activities

    -1000

    -500

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Net ash inflow

    Net cash inflow

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    22/27

    Figure 5.20 Cash Flow

    Interpretation

    1. Cash flow from operating activities is good enough, which shows the companyis performing well.

    2. Cash flow from operating activities is greater than investing and financingactivities for most of the years.

    3. There is cash outflow from investing activities, which shows the company istaking new project.

    4. The cash outflow from financing activities describes the dividend payment.5. Cash flow from investing and financing activities is fluctuating very highly.6. The company has good cash inflow for all year except 2009-10.7. The companys average cash inflow is 489.8 per year, which means the

    company is in good position.

    8. The main source of cash outflow is purchasing fixed assets.9. In the year of 2008-2009 the company had high amount of other non- cash

    charges.

    10.Either cash inflow or outflow from or to sundry debtors is very high.11.In the year of 2005-06 it has cash inflow of Rs109.77 crore for extra-ordinary

    items.

    -2000

    -1500

    -1000

    -500

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    CF from operatingactivities

    CF from investment

    activities

    CF from financingactivities

    Net cash inflow

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    23/27

    12.The company is not paying dividend regularly. So, the cash out flow fordividend is not constant. Though the dividend is constant except year 2006-07.

    13.It took huge long-term loan during the year 2007-08 and 2008-09.

    As a result

    the amount of paying is interest is also increasing.

    14.The company is not giving any loan and advances for last 5 years.15.In the year of 2006-07 the company sold its major amount of investments and

    purchased same amount of fixed assets.

    16.The company is managing same level of inventory. So the cash outflow orinflow for inventory is minimum.

    17.The company is selling its fixed assets least amount.

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    24/27

    1page

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    25/27

    Figure 5.21 Fund Flow

    Interpretation

    1. This Fund flow statement shows that sources and applications of fund are wellmanaged.

    2. The major sources of fund are long term secured loan and operating activities.3. Fixed asset is the main application of fund.4. The company has average fund flow of Rs.1500 crore which describe sound

    financial position of the company.

    5. Misc. expenses are increasing every year.6. The company is mainly trying to decrease the deferred tax liability. And it is

    the application of fund.

    7. The company is increasing its working capital every year except 2010, whichtells that company is in good position.

    5.5Statisti al AnalysisCorrelation between wor ing apital and profit.

    (Rs. in rore)

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    FundFlo

    Fund Flo

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    26/27

    Net Wor ing

    apital

    2876.25 3744.81 4049.71 4705.51 4681.17

    Net Profit702.35 566.78 1101.57 821.09 1247.46

    Table 5.17 Correlation between Net WC & Net Profit

    Correlation coefficient =0.585

    Interpretation

    1. Net profit is not positively related with working capital.2. As the correlation coefficient is less, so net profit is less related with working

    capital.

    Correlation between sales and net profit.

    (Rs. in rore)

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Sales 2201.41 2108.11 2981.65 3354.91 4121.03

    Net Profit702.35 566.78 1101.57 821.09 1247.46

    Table 5.18 Correlation between sales& Net Profit

    Correlation coefficient =0.86

    Interpretation

    1. Net profit is strongly positively correlated with sales.2. Net profit is increasing with more sales and decreasing with less sales.

    Correlation between net profit and dividend.

    (Rs. in rore)

    Year 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

    Net Profit702.35 566.78 1101.57 821.09 1247.46

    Dividend335.54 201.33 335.54 335.54 335.54

    Table 5.19 Correlation between Net Profit& Dividend

  • 8/4/2019 5-CHAPTER-5(by mukul)

    27/27

    Correlation coefficient=0.64

    Interpretation

    1.

    Dividend is positively correlated with net profit.2. The correlation coefficient value is less, which tells that dividend policy is

    not including net profit.