5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary...

55
5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS 1 Topic 5 Hawaii Click for audio

Transcript of 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary...

Page 1: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS

1Topic 5

HawaiiClick for audio

Page 2: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Relative motions between plates are most important

In some applications important to consider absolute plate motions, those with respect to the deep mantle

In general both plates and plate boundaries move with respect to the deep mantle

For example, assume Africa were not moving with respect to the deep mantle. If so, as lithosphere is added by spreading at the Mid-Atlantic ridge, both the ridge and South America move westward relative to the mantle.

Conversely, as the African plate lost area by subduction beneath Eurasia in the Mediterranean, the trench "rolls backwards, moving south relative to the mantle.

Increasingly, it seems that such motions may have significant tectonic consequences

No direct way to measure absolute motions, need to infer indirectly

ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS

2Topic 5

Page 3: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

NNR reference frame obtained assuming no net rotation of the lithosphere as a whole, so sum of the absolute motion of all plates weighted by their area is zero

NNR reference frame similar to hotspot frame

Despite unresolved questions about the nature and existence of hot spots and plumes, NNR reference frames often used to infer absolute motions

NNR - NO NET ROTATION ABSOLUTE MOTIONS

3Topic 5

Page 4: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

To compute absolute motions, recognize that motions in an absolute reference frame correspond to adding a rotation to all plates

Use Euler vector formulation and treat absolute reference frame as mathematically equivalent to another plate

For example, given NNR Euler vector relative to North America wNNR-NAits negative wNA-NNR is the absolute Euler vector ΩNA for North America in NNR reference frame

Hence relative motions are the difference in absolute motions

wij = Ωi - Ωj

i.e. for Pacific & North America

wNA-PA = ΩNA - ΩPA = wNA-NNR - wPA-NNR

and linear velocity in absolute reference frame at point r on plate i is

Vi = Ωi x r

ABSOLUTE MOTION CALCULATION

4Topic 5

Page 5: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Topic 5 5

Vj = Ωj x rVi = Ωi x r

Plate i Plate j

MIDOCEAN RIDGE MIGRATION WITH RESPECT TO DEEP MANTLE

At a point on the ridge at position r, the absolute motion of the ridge is the average of the absolute motions of the points on either side (i.e. on the two plates)

Vridge = (Vi + Vj )/2

Page 6: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

RIDGES TYPICALLY MIGRATE WITH RESPECT TO THE MANTLE

May have effects on topography, spreading process, magma chemistry

Stein et al, 1977

6Topic 5

Page 7: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

ABSOLUTE PLATE VELOCITY SEEMS TO AFFECT SPREADING

Forsyth et al., 1998

7

Results from MELT experiment in schematic cross-section of upper mantle beneath East Pacific Rise.

Melting region is asymmetric, with wider zone west of the ridge than east of it.

Topic 5

Page 8: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Results from MELT experiment in schematic cross-section of upper mantle beneath East Pacific Rise.

Melting region is asymmetric, with wider zone west of the ridge than east of it.

Spreading is asymmetric, with Pacific (west) side faster

ABSOLUTE PLATE VELOCITY SEEMS TO AFFECT SPREADING

8Topic 5

Forsyth et al., 1998

Page 9: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

RELATIVE MOTIONS

a) What’s the full spreading rate?

b) What would be the half spreading rate on either side of the ridge if spreading were symmetric?

ABSOLUTE MOTION

c) How fast is the ridge migrating with respect to the mantle and in which direction?

CLASS QUESTION 20:

9Topic 5

Forsyth et al., 1998

Page 10: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Topic 5 10

https://physics.stackexchange.com/

https://www.heddels.com

LIGHT WAVE POLARIZATION

Page 11: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

OBSERVING MANTLE FLOW WITH SEISMIC ANISOTROPY

Anisotropic materials cause seismic waves traveling through them to travel faster or slower depending on their direction.

A shear wave can be split into two pulses, each with a different polarity and traveling at a different speed

Stein & Wysession, 2003

11Topic 5

Page 12: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

a axis is fastest directionThis is also dominant slip direction, so olivine crystals align in direction of plastic flow

OLIVINE IS STRONGLY ANISOTROPIC

Babuska and Cara, 1991

12Topic 5

Page 13: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Sub-crustal oceanic lithosphere shows strong anisotropy.

Flow processes associated with plate spreading appear to orient olivine crystalspreferentially in the spreading direction

Pn head waves that sample the uppermost mantle just below the Moho show a strong azimuthal velocity dependence, with velocity highest in the spreading direction or 180 from it. This anisotropy is "frozen in" as the lithosphere ages.

ANISOTROPY FROM RELATIVE PLATE MOTION

Morris et al., 1969

13Topic 5

Stein & Wysession, 2003

Page 14: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

In eastern North America fast axis is oriented NE-SW, parallel to the direction of absolute plate motion and thus presumably asthenosphericflow.

Could also be frozen in from Appalachian mountain building

DEEPER ANISOTROPY DUE TO ORIENTED OLIVINE IN FLOWING ASTHENOSPHERE

Fouch et al., 2000

14Topic 5

Page 15: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

ANISTROPY MAPS FLOWING ASTHENOSPHERE AT SUBDUCTION ZONES

Along-arc flow associated with opening Lau Basin

Smith et al., 2001

15Topic 5

Page 16: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Hot spot hypothesis assumes certain linear volcanic trends result from plate motion over a hot spot, fixed source of volcanism, causing melting in the overriding plate.

If the overriding plate is oceanic, get progression from active volcanism that builds islands, to older islands, to underwater seamounts as sea floor moves away from hot spot, cools, and subsides. Get topographic swell around hotspot and volcanic age progression away from it.

Direction and age of volcanic chain give motion of plate with respect to hot spot.

Hot spot tracks beneath different plates and assuming hot spots fixed with respect to deep mantle (or move relative to each other more slowly than plates), yields hot spot reference frame.

ABSOLUTE MOTION FROM HOT SPOTS

16Topic 5

Stein & Wysession, 2003

Hot spot

Page 17: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

17

Stein 1997

Topic 5

CLASS QUESTION 21:To simulate a hotspot track, push a pencil (representing a hotspot) and move a piece of paper (representing a plate). Hold the pencil fixed relative to a bottom piece of paper (representing the fixed mantle).

Simulate the Hawaiian-Emperor hotspot track starting 70 million years ago and explain on the resulting plot how the Pacific plate moved relative to the presumably fixed mantle.

Page 18: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

18Topic 5

Click for animation

Page 19: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

HOTSPOT / PLUME HYPOTHESISOften assumed hot spots result from plumes of hot material rising from great depth, perhaps core-mantle boundary

Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material.

19Topic 5

Stein & Wysession, 2003

Would be important in Earths thermal & chemical evolution.

Would have tectonic significance -heads of new plume might cause continental breakup and flood basalts

Page 20: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

20

Formed by mantle plumes or…?Topic 5

LIPS – Large Igneous Provinces

Page 21: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Large Igneous Province (LIP) proposed to have originated from present Réunionhotspot which first upwelled beneath India in the late Cretaceous

Overall appearance of Deccan, roughly circular outcrop and linear Chagos-Laccadive Ridge south of India, looks like what is expected for spherical plume head and narrow plume tail

CLR would be hotspot track

DECCAN TRAPS OF INDIA

1,200-m-thick exposed section through Deccan flood basalts (H. Steh)

DECCAN

CLR

PRESENT REUNION HOTSPOT

21Topic 5

Page 22: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

22

MCR has the linear geometry of a rift and the magma volume of a

Large Igneous Province (LIP)

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0.25 km

0.5 km

1 km2 km

5 km10km

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Area (106 km2)

Average Thickness of Continental Flood Basalts

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Columbia River

Deccan

Siberia

EmeishanEthiopian

NAVP

Parana−Etendeka

Karoo−Ferrar CAMP

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

MCR

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

MCR=Midcontinent RiftCAMP=Central Atlantic Magmatic Province

NAVP=North Atlantic Volcanic Province0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Volu

me

(106 k

m3 )

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Stein et al., 2015

Combination suggestive of thick volcanics at most rifted continental margins

Topic 5

Page 23: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Concepts of hot spots and plumes are attractive and widely used, but the relation between the persistent volcanism and possible deep mantle plumes is under active investigation because of many deviations from what would be expected:

Some hot spots move significantly

Some chains show no clear age progression

Oceanic heat flow data show little or no thermal anomalies at the swells

Seismological studies find low-velocity anomalies, but assessing their depth extent and relation to possible plumes is difficult and controversial

Convection models of plumes rising from core-mantle boundary may not correctly include pressure effects

HOTSPOT / PLUME CONTROVERSY

23Topic 5

Page 24: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

HOTSPOT TYPES:MIDPLATE CONTINENTAL (Yellowstone,…)

MIDPLATE OCEANIC (Hawaii, Bermuda,…)

ON OR NEAR RIDGE (Iceland, Azores, Easter…)

24Topic 5

Page 25: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING USAType example of continental hot spot?

25Topic 5

Page 26: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

AGE PROGRESSIVE VOLCANISMTrend consistent with absolute motion of North America

Stein & Wysession, 2003

26Topic 5

Page 27: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Topic 5 27

Page 28: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

28Topic 5

MEDICAL TOMOGRAPHY (CAT scan)

Page 29: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

29Davidson et al

Topic 5

SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY

Davidson

Zhao et al., 1997

Stein & Stein, 1996

Page 30: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

SEISMIC VELOCITIES DO NOT SHOW EXPECTED DEEP MANTLE PLUME

Low velocity anomaly presumably associated with hot upwelling

restricted to upper mantle, shallower than expected from plume model

YELLOWSTONE

Upwarped 410 km discontinuity, indicative of

relatively cool mantle at this depth

Humphreys et al., 2000

Christiansen et al., 2002

30Topic 5

Page 31: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

FURTHER COMPLEXITY: additional volcanic progression to west -Newberry volcanicsProposed alternative: forced mantle flow and decompression melting resulting from local plate motions. Near subduction zone upper mantle forced to flow northwest because of corner flow driven by subducting plate.

Yellowstone and Newberry magmatism follow these trends as fertile mantle flows past residuum and ascends (red-to-white arrows).

Humphreys et al., 2000

31Topic 5

Page 32: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

MIDPLATE OCEANIC HOTSPOT: HAWAIIAN EMPEROR CHAIN

Mauna Loa

32Topic 5

Stein & Wysession, 2003

Click for video

Page 33: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Davidson 7.1

BEND ?

Diamond Head, Oahu~200,000 yr

GEOLOGIC UNCERTAINTYAGE PROGRESSION

Topic 5 33

Page 34: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Bend in the Hawaiian-Emperor chain interpreted as indicating Pacific plate changed direction about 43 Ma, leaving bend as plate moved over fixed hotspot now under Hawaii

34Topic 5

BEND ?

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Page 35: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

PROBLEM 1: THE 43 Ma NONEVENT

No evidence for change in relative plate motions at 43 Ma, since fracture zone orientations unaffected

35Topic 5

Page 36: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Fixed hotspot would cause all seamounts to have same paleolatitudeHawaiian hotspot actually drifted southward between 47 and 81 Ma

Tarduno and Cottrell (1997)

PROBLEM 2: HAWAIIAN

HOTSPOT HAS NOT BEEN

FIXED

36Topic 5

Page 37: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Davis et al, G3, 2001

Line Islands: age progression?

Topic 5 37

Page 38: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

ICELAND - NEAR RIDGE HOTSPOTHotspot now under Iceland may have been piping material to ridge from far away, since it has been active long before hotspot would have arrived on MAR from NW

Gives paired track (Iceland-Faeroe & Iceland-Greenland highs)

May have had role in Greenland continental margin breakup

Debate: is a hotspot required?

HOTSPOT POSITIONS

Vink, 1984

Foulger, 2002

38Topic 5

Page 39: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

39

ICELAND ISSUES

Does excess volcanism causing thick crust and hence subariel nature reflect high temperature plume?

Korenaga, 2003

Or is this a compositional effect due to the melting of unusual mantle?

Topic 5

Page 40: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

40

ICELAND ISSUES

Unusual mantle may be consequence of closing of Iapetus Ocean, leaving residuum from slab

Korenaga, 2003

If process forming Iceland directly reflected continental breakup, its persistence under the ridge doesnt require a hotspot or lateral mantle flow

Topic 5

Page 41: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

41

ICELAND ISSUES

How deep does seismic velocity anomaly extend?

Bijwaard & Spakman [1999]

Ritsema et al. [1999]

Topic 5

Page 42: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

42

ICELAND ISSUES

Heat flow higher on east (Eurasian) than west (North American) plate

Opposite of expected from plume model, since plume assumed to have come from northwest

Stein & Stein [2003]

Topic 5

Page 43: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

East African Rift

Gulf of Aden, Gulf of California

Atlantic

Continental rifting

Young ocean

Mature ocean with passive continental margins

Are plumes important for rifting & the Wilson cycle?

Do plumes cause continental rifting, as suggested by the large volcanic rock deposits

on continental passive margins?

Topic 5 43

Page 44: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

End-member rifting models [Sengor & Burke, 1978] differ in whether magmatism is cause or effect of rifting

1: “Active" rifting in response to melting in the underlying asthenosphere or deeper mantle as a result of mantle plumes or

shallower thermal or compositional anomalies

Ruppel, 1995

Topic 5 44

Page 45: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

End-member rifting models [Sengor & Burke, 1978] differ in whether magmatism is cause or effect of rifting2: Passiverifting is response to stresses transmitted within the

lithosphere

Ruppel, 1995

Topic 5 45

Page 46: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

46

Plume model for continental breakup – active rifting gives three arms, yielding midocean ridge and aulacogens

(failed arms)

After Dewey & Burke, 1974

Topic 5

Page 47: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

47Topic 5

Page 48: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

48

Continental Rift Evolution and Possible Paths

Stein et al., 2018

Topic 5

Page 49: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

49

Stein et al., 2018

Topic 5

Midcontinent Rift evolution model

Page 50: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

50

Thick volcanic rock sequences at rifted continental margins

Look like what the MCR would have evolved to, had it split and started seafloor spreading

Stein et al., 2018

Topic 5

Page 51: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Underplating

As low density melt rises, high density residue

(“restite”) ponds at base of crust

compensating for the thinning of

initial crust

Topic 5 51

Stein et al., 2018

Page 52: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

52

Stein et al., 2018

Topic 5

Page 53: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Topic 5 53

Chron M0 ~125 Ma

Conjugate margins formed bycontinental breakup

Molly Gallahue

Page 54: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

Topic 5 54

Palisades, Hudson River, New York

Planetware.com

Greenland

Class Question 22: Explain to a non-geologist friend why these three different places look similar

Tettegouche State Park, Minnesota

Page 55: 5: ABSOLUTE PLATE MOTIONS & HOTSPOTS...perhaps core-mantle boundary Plumes would be secondary convection mode, ~ 5% of heat transfer, bringing up deep mantle material. Topic 5 19 Stein

SUMMARYAbsolute motions can be defined relative to either No Net Rotation or Hotspot reference frames

Absolute motions may have roles in tectonics but details unclear

Hotspot/plume model has many strengths, but also major problems.

Do plumes cause continental rifting, as suggested by the large volcanic rock deposits on continental passive margins?

55Topic 5