4ps 186 Gate 0 Gateway Review Planning Meeting Luton Borough Council Building Schools for the Future...
-
Upload
lorena-edwards -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 4ps 186 Gate 0 Gateway Review Planning Meeting Luton Borough Council Building Schools for the Future...
4ps 186 Gate 0 Gateway Review
Planning Meeting
Luton Borough Council
Building Schools for the
Future
02 May 2006
what is a gateway review?
An independent peer review process applied to a project at key decision points in it’s life cycle, to:
• Provide assurance it can progress successfully to the next stage
• Facilitate the delivery of better quality projects for local authorities, to achieve:
• Better scoping of projects
• Faster delivery of benefits
• Appropriate structure of contracts
• Better VFM
what are the benefits? (1)
The 4ps Gateway process provides assurance & support for Project Owners by:
• Delivering an unbiased assessment carried out by an independent team
• Evaluating whether the best available skills & experience are deployed on the project
• Assessing whether all stakeholders fully support the project’s status & the issues involved
what are the benefits? (2)
The 4ps Gateway Process provides assurance & support for Project Owners by promoting:
• The achievement of more realistic time & cost targets for projects
• The development of knowledge & skills among local government staff through participation in review teams
• The provision of advice & guidance to project teams by fellow practitioners
• The practice of partnership between the project team and the Gateway review team
project owners & gateways (1)
• Always regarded as client for the report
• Consulted as to the issues the teams will concentrate on
• Privacy of results:
• Copy to PO only
• PO can use to best advantage
• 2nd copy to 4ps Gateway Team for extraction of generic lessons learnt
• Post review the 4ps Gateway Team will ask PO for permission to share the report with others within 4ps – this is not mandatory
• 4ps Executive will also discuss other 4ps services that may be appropriate for the project
project owners & gateways (2)
At the request of the PO issues can be classified as Red / Amber / Green (RAG)
• Red – one or more issues are critical & must be addressed before proceeding
(it does not mean stop)
• Amber – some issues are critical before the next review
• Green – these issues are potential areas for improvement
the generic gateway process
Procurement Projects
Develop Business Case
Develop Procurement
Strategy
Competitive Procurement
Award and Implement Contract
Manage Contract
Closure
Develop Business Case
Execute Programme
Close Programme
Contributes
Gateway 1 Business
Justification
Gateway 2 Procurement Strategy
Gateway 3 Investment
Decision
Gateway 4 Readiness for Service
Gateway 5 Benefits
Realisation
Gateway 0 Strategic
Assessment
Gateway 0 Strategic
Assessment
Gateway 0 Strategic
Assessment
Strategic Programme
100%
Whole Life Expenditure
Confirm Justificatio
n
OJEC Contract Award
In-Service
Confirm Benefits
Time
0%
Confirmstrateg
y
Strategic
Assessment
Business
Justification
Procurement
Approach
Competitive
Procurement
Readiness for
Service
Benefits
Evaluation
opportunity to influence outcome
The teams will work together in the following ways:
A statement of principles for the conduct of the Review Team, agreed with the Project Team. To ensure a consistent professional manner in interactions with individuals and in the approach and attitude to the review.
code of conduct
Team meeting
PO meeting
PO report meetingFact finding Fact finding Fact finding
Report writing Report writing Report writing
Report Template Preparation
Emerging findings with PO/project
manager
Emerging findings with PO/project
manager
Typical 3 Day ReviewDay 1 Day 2 Day 3
Interviews to be loaded into first 2 days and to be avoided on Day 3.
multi - tasking essential
• Review the business need
• Supported by users and stakeholders
• Contributes to the Authority’s strategy
• Proposed governance arrangements
• Management of project or programme
• Managing the main project risks
• Financial provision for the project through to next stage (Gateway Review 1) properly resourced & authorised.
gateway 0 – strategic assessment
some issues/topics for the review
Project Owner’s issues:
Others:• Learning from elsewhere
people to see
• Tony Dessent• Roger Lucas• Project Manager• Consultant Project Manager Adviser• Procurement Manager• Education Adviser• SEN Adviser• ICT Adviser• Asset Manager• Council Leader• Childrens Services Portfolio Holder• Leader of the Opposition• Council CEO• Head Legal & Democratic Services• Chief Financial Officer• Head of Regeneration
• ? Heads of other Council Directorates• Financial Adviser• Legal Adviser• BSF Commission members• PfS• DfES• 4ps BSF Adviser• 3 Head Teachers• 2 School Governors• Parents rep• Diocesan rep?• LSC• Unions?
documents to see
• Council Corporate Plan• BSF Education Vision• Summary of “Every Child Matters”/Childrens Services strategy• School Improvement Plan• Schools asset Management Plan• SEN strategy• ICT strategy• PID/PEP/Project Brief or equivalent• Governance arrangements/ terms of reference etc.• Project plans• Corporate risk register• BSF risk management strategy/risk register/risk plans• Issues log• Activity & resource plans
• Project financial control documents• LEP procurement strategy• Stakeholder/communications/ consultation strategy• Sample set of minutes – 3 max from BSF Commission,
Project Board/Steering Gp. &/or Project Team• Relevant Council/Cabinet/ reports, minutes of approvals• Options appraisals/schools BSF options• Relevant Ofsted report(s)• 14-19 Agenda documents• Performance Assessments• Council/Project Organogram
review logistics
• Documentation requested needs to be available by Monday 15 May. Copy x 1 of key project documents on site
• 2 rooms available through the review
• Access, car parking and security passes, if necessary
• Interviews to start from 9.30am Day 1; 9.00am Day 2
• Interview time & gap between (i.e. 45 mins discussion + 15 mins to confer) 30mins interviews acceptable with Members and/or for telecons
• Strong preference for individual face-to-face interviews rather than telecon & for 1 interview stream for key stakeholders.
• Working lunch and refreshments during day
• Equipment needed (ie. access to printers, flipcharts, conference/hands free phones for telecon).