4.2 Natural Resources...(see Table 8 and Figure 15). The most abundant soil type within the study...

2
2018 MASTER PLAN | FEDERAL RESEARCH CENTER 126 DRAFT 4.2 Natural Resources The existing natural features of the FRC defining the built-up land at the FDA campus include large wooded land areas, wooded stream valleys, and grassy meadow areas. The rolling topography, water resources, and the wildlife habitats enhance the FDA’s and Air Force’s employee and visitor experience. GSA analyzed potential direct, indirect, short-term, long-term, and cumulative impacts on the natural resources associated with each of the alternatives under consideration. 4.2.1 Soils and Topography There are eight soil unit types within the study area (see Table 8 and Figure 15). The most abundant soil type within the study area is Croom gravelly loam which accounts for over 70 percent of the soils. The next most abundant soil type is classified as Urban Land where 75 percent of the surface is covered by asphalt, buildings, or other structures. Approximately 9 acres in the FDA Campus contains Croom gravelly loam and Blocktown channery silt loam (USDA, 2017); the slope associated with these soils may have a severe hazard of erosion (USDA, 1995). Prime farmland soils are soils that have the best combination of characteristics for producing crops such as food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops. Sassafras loam with 2 to 5 percent slopes (58B) is considered prime farmland soils in all areas. Soil map unit 58B comprises approximately 3 percent of the soil within the FDA Campus. Glenelg silt loam with 8 to 15 percent slopes (2C) and Croom gravelly loam with 3 to 8 percent slopes (61B) and with 8 to 15 percent slopes (61C) are classified as farmland soils of statewide importance and account for the majority of the soils within the project area (USDA, 2017). Although there a prime farmland soils within the FDA Campus, the land is classified as urban or built-up and therefore exempt from the Farm Protection Act. Generally speaking, the topography of the FRC is generally rolling with elevations ranging from approximately 160 to 400 feet above mean sea level (msl). Within the FDA Campus, the topography is relatively flat due to grading and existing construction, ranging from approximately 350 to 390 feet msl. Towards the west end of the FRC, elevation is approximately 290 feet msl with steep slopes along the unnamed tributaries to Paint Branch. Slopes of greater than 15 percent are considered to have severe erosion potential. Figure 4-5: Soil Map Units Within the Study Areas (USDA, 2017) Figure 4-6: Area adjacent to new loop road Soil Unit Soil Type Slopes 2C Glenelg silt loam 8 to 15 percent slopes 58B Sassafras loam 2 to 5 percent slopes 58C Sassafras loam 8 to 15 percent slopes 61B Croom gravelly loam 3 to 8 percent slopes 61C Croom gravelly loam 8 to 15 percent slopes 61 D Croom gravelly loam 15 to 25 percent slopes 116E Blocktown channery silt loam 25 to 45 percent slopes 400 Urban Land 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

Transcript of 4.2 Natural Resources...(see Table 8 and Figure 15). The most abundant soil type within the study...

Page 1: 4.2 Natural Resources...(see Table 8 and Figure 15). The most abundant soil type within the study area is Croom gravelly loam which accounts for over 70 percent of the soils. The next

2018 MASTER PLAN | FEDERAL RESEARCH CENTER126

DRAFT

4.2 Natural ResourcesThe existing natural features of the FRC defining the built-up land at the FDA campus include large wooded land areas, wooded stream valleys, and grassy meadow areas. The rolling topography, water resources, and the wildlife habitats enhance the FDA’s and Air Force’s employee and visitor experience. GSA analyzed potential direct, indirect, short-term, long-term, and cumulative impacts on the natural resources associated with each of the alternatives under consideration.

4.2.1 Soils and TopographyThere are eight soil unit types within the study area (see Table 8 and Figure 15). The most abundant soil type within the study area is Croom gravelly loam which accounts for over 70 percent of the soils. The next most abundant soil type is classified as Urban Land where 75 percent of the surface is covered by asphalt, buildings, or other structures. Approximately 9 acres in the FDA Campus contains Croom gravelly loam and Blocktown channery silt loam (USDA, 2017); the slope associated with these soils may have a severe hazard of erosion (USDA, 1995).

Prime farmland soils are soils that have the best combination of characteristics for producing crops such as food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops. Sassafras loam with 2 to 5 percent slopes (58B) is considered prime farmland soils in all areas. Soil map unit 58B comprises approximately 3 percent of the soil within the FDA Campus. Glenelg silt loam with 8 to 15 percent slopes (2C) and Croom gravelly loam with 3 to 8 percent slopes (61B) and with 8 to 15 percent slopes (61C) are classified as farmland soils of statewide importance and account for the majority of the soils within the project area (USDA, 2017). Although there a prime farmland soils within the FDA Campus, the land is classified as urban or built-up and therefore exempt from the Farm Protection Act. Generally speaking, the topography of the FRC is generally rolling with elevations ranging from approximately 160 to 400 feet above mean sea level (msl). Within the FDA Campus, the topography is relatively flat due to grading and existing construction, ranging from approximately 350 to 390 feet msl. Towards the west end of the FRC, elevation is approximately 290 feet msl with steep slopes along the unnamed tributaries to Paint Branch. Slopes of greater than 15 percent are considered to have severe erosion potential.

Figure 4-5: Soil Map Units Within the Study Areas (USDA, 2017)Figure 4-6: Area adjacent to new loop road

Affected Environment and Impacts to the Human Environment  

2018 MASTER PLAN | FDA FEDERAL RESEARCH CENTER  65 

Figure 15Error! Reference source not found.). The most abundant soil type within the study area is 1 

Croom gravelly loam which accounts for over 70 percent of the soils. The next most abundant soil type is 2 

classified as Urban Land where 75 percent of the surface is covered by asphalt, buildings, or other 3 

structures.  Approximately 9 acres in the FDA Campus contains Croom gravelly loam and Blocktown 4 

channery silt loam (USDA, 2017); the slope associated with these soils may have a severe hazard of 5 

erosion (USDA, 1995).   6 

Table 8. Soil Map Units Within the Study Areas (USDA, 2017)  7 

Soil Unit  Soil Type  Slopes 

2C  Glenelg silt loam   8 to 15 percent slopes 

58B  Sassafras loam  2 to 5 percent slopes 

58C  Sassafras loam  8 to 15 percent slopes 

61B  Croom gravelly loam  3 to 8 percent slopes 

61C  Croom gravelly loam   8 to 15 percent slopes 

61 D  Croom gravelly loam   15 to 25 percent slopes 

116E  Blocktown channery silt loam  25 to 45 percent slopes 

400  Urban Land    8 

   9    10 

1

23456789101112

13

141516171819202122232425

262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152

Page 2: 4.2 Natural Resources...(see Table 8 and Figure 15). The most abundant soil type within the study area is Croom gravelly loam which accounts for over 70 percent of the soils. The next

2018 MASTER PLAN | FEDERAL RESEARCH CENTER127

DRAFT

4.2.2 Surface Water and Wetlands

All waterways on the FRC are unnamed tributaries of Paint Branch, located within the Anacostia River watershed. Perennial and intermittent streams on the FDA site are subject to Montgomery County Stream Valley Buffers (SVBs) and require a 150-foot minimum buffer, which may be expanded up to 200 feet to include steep slopes equal to or greater than 25 percent, 100-year floodplains, wetlands, and wetland buffers. No buildings, structures, impervious surfaces, or activities requiring clearing or grading are permitted within SVBs, except for unavoidable road, trail, or utility crossings.

No-Action AlternativeUnder the No-Action Alternative no significant, direct impacts would occur. GSA would provide appropriate stormwater management for non-compliant parking lots resulting in a minor, long-term, beneficial impact to streams and wetlands.

Stream Valley Buffers and Mitigation StrategiesA number of the development scenarios may require development in or adjacent to existing stream valley buffers.

M-NCPPC provides guidelines for stream valley buffers and development. Based upon those guidelines, mitigation of encroachments into the stream valley buffers could be mitigated by re-forestation plantings. The re-forested areas may be on a 1:1 basis with the impacted area.

M-NCPPC recommended guidelines for stream buffers states:

“5. The plan design provides compensation for loss of buffer function.

In reviewing buffer compensation proposals, staff

will consider such options as buffer averaging, enhanced forestation, bioengineering practices, and other environmentally beneficial techniques. Buffer averaging provides environmentally comparable on-site area outside the delineated stream buffer in exchange for the allowance of encroachment elsewhere in the delineated stream buffer. The concept of enhanced forestation (as described in detail in Chapter V, section C) goes beyond the county legal requirements for forest conservation to enhance the existing riparian forest or to accelerate the creation of healthy mature forest in afforestation/reforestation areas.”

p.19 Environmental Guidelines

Examples of Stream Valley Mitigation Improvements

1

2

3456789101112131415

16

171819202122

23

242526272829303132333435

36373839404142

434445464748495051525354555657