4007S1_05_Kimel

download 4007S1_05_Kimel

of 18

Transcript of 4007S1_05_Kimel

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    1/18

    Focus Group Methodology

    Miriam Bar-Din Kimel PhD

    Senior Project Manager

    MEDTAP International, Inc.

    Presentation prepared forThe FDA Drug Safety & Risk Management Advisory Committee Meeting

    Gaithersburg, Maryland

    December 4, 2003

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    2/18

    Overview of Presentation Overview of study method

    Methodology

    Strengths & limitations

    Application to the drug naming process

    Conclusions

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    3/18

    Overview of Study Method Qualitative research method

    Address research questions that requiredepth of understanding that cannot beachieved through quantitative methods.

    Purpose: exploratory, pretesting,triangulation, phenomenology

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    4/18

    Purpose Gather background information

    Diagnose problems Stimulate new ideas or identify new

    relationships

    Generate hypotheses Evaluate programs

    Interpret quantitative results

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    5/18

    Focus Group Methodology Independent investigation

    Principal data source

    Multi-method study or program

    Qualitative & quantitative methods

    Triangulation

    Supplement

    Interpretation of quantitative data

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    6/18

    Types of Focus Groups Traditional

    In-person, directive, structured Internet alternative

    Brainstorming In-person, nondirective, unstructured

    Nominal/Delphi technique Mail, directive, structured Internet alternative

    Field, natural In-person, spontaneous, unstructured

    Field, formal In-person, directive, semi-structured

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    7/18

    Traditional Focus Groups 8-12 participants

    Under direction of trained moderator Formal, directive, structured

    60-150 minutes

    Recorded, supplemented by field notes Observed by scientific team

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    8/18

    Traditional Focus Groups Participants

    Break characteristics populations

    Control characteristics

    # & nature of groups & sessions Purpose

    Design complexity Break characteristics

    Resources

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    9/18

    Data Qualitative/Textual Tape recordings

    Transcriptions 2 hour session: 40 to 50 pages

    Field notes

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    10/18

    Data Analysis Driven by underlying research question Qualitative

    Interpretive, constrained by context

    Topics linked to group guidelines Steps

    Mechanical organizing, subdividing Interpretive developing subdivisions (code mapping),

    search for patterns within subdivisions, drawing meaningfulconclusions

    Software: e.g.,The Ethnograph; Atlas.ti; QSR N6 Reliability

    Repeated review of data Independent analysis by > two experienced analysts

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    11/18

    Results Qualitative:

    Themes, Issues, Concerns

    Substantiating Quotes

    Quantitative:

    No. of participants who agreed or disagreed

    Frequency of themes within the group discussion

    Sample characteristics

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    12/18

    Strengths & Limitations

    Focus group methodology is only asuseful and as strong as its link to theunderlying research question and the

    rigor with which it is applied.

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    13/18

    Strengths Provides concentrated amounts of rich data,

    in participants own words, on precisely the

    topic of interest Interaction of participants adds richness to

    the data that may be missed in individualinterviews

    Provides critical information in developmentof hypotheses or interpretation of quantitativedata

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    14/18

    Limitations Small number of participants

    Limited generalizability Group dynamics can be a challenge

    Particularly if moderator is inexperienced

    Interpretation Time-consuming

    Requires experienced analysts

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    15/18

    Application to Drug Naming (1:2)

    Focus groups can: Elicit potential sources of confusion from the users

    perspective Physicians, pharmacists, nurses, patients, caregivers Practice and real world factors

    Identify situations in which confusion is most likely to occur Situations, conditions, patient populations

    User x situation interactions

    Prioritize empirical study Inform expert panels

    Participants, conditions, names

    Test conclusions of expert panels Alternative users patients, caregivers

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    16/18

    Application to Drug Naming (2:2)

    Focus groups can: Inform quantitative research design

    Laboratory or simulations

    Provide qualitative data to aid in the interpretationof quantitative results Unexpected areas of confusion or lack of confusion

    Serve as an integral part of a multi-methodevaluation program Triangulation

    Provide qualitative foundation for designing riskassessment and management studies Professional practice and home-use patterns

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    17/18

    Conclusions Focus group methodology

    provides rich depth of understanding of thephenomenon of interest

    can be used in isolation, or to complementor supplement quantitative methods

    is as useful and as strong as its link to theunderlying research question and the rigorwith which it is applied.

  • 8/8/2019 4007S1_05_Kimel

    18/18

    Author Contact InformationMiriam Bar-Din Kimel PhD

    Senior Project ManagerMEDTAP International, Inc

    7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600

    Bethesda, MD 20814(301) 654-9729

    [email protected]