40. German High Command Case
-
Upload
james-peter-garces -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of 40. German High Command Case
-
8/17/2019 40. German High Command Case
1/2
40
DOCTRINE: Criminality does not attach to every individual in this chain of
command from the fact alone. There must be a personal dereliction.
That occur only where the act directly traceable to him or where his
failure to properly supervise his subordinates constitutes criminal
negligence on his part.
The United States of America vs. Wilhelm von Lee! et al
"erman #i$h Command Case
%ACTS: Wilhelm von Leeb together with other thirteen accused were former
high-ranking ocers in the German army and navy and ocers holding high
positions in the German !igh Command were indicted for crimes against
peace war crimes crimes against humanity and a common plan allegedly
committed during the "uropean War . General Wilhelm von Leeb was
charged with implementing !itler#s Commissar and $arbarossa %rders.
&uring the meeting held by !itler when the proposed e'termination of the
commissars was announced (on Leeb protested against its implementation
by discussing it with other high-ranking ocials who supported him for it is in
violation of the international law. )otwithstanding such opposition the order
was issued to the subordinate units of the German army. The $arbarossa
*urisdiction order was received directly by the army group under (on Leeb#s
command that pertains to the conduct and discipline of troops particularly
*udicial authority to shoot those who are merely suspected of certain acts.
The order was not put into the chain of command nor was disapproved by
him. +ecords show that the order was criminally applied by his subordinates.
The implementation of the Commissar and $arbarossa orders resulted to the
murder of +ussian political ocers and maltreatment of +ussian Civilian.
ISSUE: Whether or not a superior is automatically responsible for atrocities
perpetrated by his subordinates.
#ELD: The court ruled in favor of (on Lieb and re*ected the thesis that a
superior is automatically responsible for atrocities perpetrated by his
subordinates. ,t acknowledged however that a superior#s negligence may
provide a proper basis for his accountability even absent direct participation
in the commission of crimes.
Criminality does not attach to every individual in this chain of command from
the fact alone. There must be a personal dereliction. That occur only where
the act directly traceable to him or where his failure to properly supervise his
subordinates constitutes criminal negligence on his part
repared by
-
8/17/2019 40. German High Command Case
2/2
40
/01"2 "T"+ ". G0+C"2