4 Reasons Why 2013 Will Be the Year of the Innovator

download 4 Reasons Why 2013 Will Be the Year of the Innovator

of 2

Transcript of 4 Reasons Why 2013 Will Be the Year of the Innovator

  • 7/30/2019 4 Reasons Why 2013 Will Be the Year of the Innovator

    1/2

    4 Reasons Why 2013 Will Be The Year of The Innovator

    A couple of years backwhen I edited Innovation Management, I was a strong innovation skeptic.

    A lot of the writing that came my way sounded really like cheer-leading rather than analysis.

    I pushed back on one after another stoke their fire or 4 Ways. type article. It was mushystuff and largely predictable.

    Enterprises, meanwhile, paid lip service to innovation, but did little more than that.

    Times change. Innovation is ripe again. Here are four reasons, apart from competitive pressures,

    why 2013 will see a surge in intelligent, strong ROI-related innovation writing, thinking and

    action. It could be your opportunity, too.

    #1. The enterprise is more deeply engaged by innovation than ever before. The reason is simple

    enoughmost organizations are overwhelmed by the requirement to change.

    I just completed 30 interviews with CIOs and Chief Innovation Officers for myCognizantFuture

    of Work project. For the first time in all the years Ive been observing enterprises I got the

    feeling that they were now becoming innovation engines, or trying to become so.

    Innovation is becoming embedded as a transformation method. Unlike social it is necessary and

    objectives-driven. And it has the broadest possible relevance to the future.

    The drawback is: how do you get a coherent overview of change in your orgfor sure it is

    happening but do you know enough about it? Are you in control of the transformation? That will

    be a big question in 2013.

    #2. Method is maturing and expanding. Go back only three years and innovation revolvedaround those corny inspirational ideas about stoking up the troops and unleashing their

    creativity.

    The problem for a lot of enterprises was that formal methods likeTRIZappeared to be too

    formal, or somehow not relevant (I think the opposite, TRIZ is highly relevant).Six Sigmawas

    too closely associated with cost reduction. Employees needed educating but enterprises were

    often too scared of opting for the wrong education.

    Now innovation is often reactive if your people are using iPhones, you had better react. You

    need to start thinking about re-architecting your infrastructure. Theres no time to lose. If youare marketing-led, you have to be multi-channel, in fact hyper-channel. Whatever business you

    are in,you are impacted by radical adjacencies.

    Methods are being adopted from start-ups and the lean philosophy in order to cope with this

    and it is a liberation. You also have genuine innovation method in instanceslike MMI see my

    post here -and a growing understanding of the complicatedbusiness environment. That means

    leaders are beginning to trust to a little bit of chaos not too much of course but enough to

    allow their organizations to reset. But it leads to point 3.

    http://www.innovationmanagement.se/http://www.innovationmanagement.se/http://www.innovationmanagement.se/http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:CTSHhttp://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:CTSHhttp://www.unevenlydistributed.com/http://www.unevenlydistributed.com/http://www.unevenlydistributed.com/http://www.unevenlydistributed.com/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIZhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIZhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIZhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigmahttp://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2011/07/14/the-rise-of-radical-adjacency/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2011/07/14/the-rise-of-radical-adjacency/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2011/07/14/the-rise-of-radical-adjacency/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/12/05/when-innovation-succeeds/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/12/05/when-innovation-succeeds/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/12/05/when-innovation-succeeds/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/12/05/when-innovation-succeeds/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/12/05/when-innovation-succeeds/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/12/05/when-innovation-succeeds/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/12/05/when-innovation-succeeds/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/12/05/when-innovation-succeeds/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2011/07/14/the-rise-of-radical-adjacency/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIZhttp://www.unevenlydistributed.com/http://www.unevenlydistributed.com/http://www.unevenlydistributed.com/http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:CTSHhttp://www.innovationmanagement.se/
  • 7/30/2019 4 Reasons Why 2013 Will Be the Year of the Innovator

    2/2

    #3. Strategic options management is growing in importance

    Most companies are faced with at least two innovation models that they are forced to function

    with. One will be a formal lab-to-market or legacy model. Another will be a service model.

    But this service model can come in two flavors. On the one hand, seeking out a service layer toprotect product. On the other, trying to find your way among all the service options inSaaSand

    Cloud and ecosystems, to form and reform offers to the long tail.

    The strategic options portfolio is becoming an essentialmanagement tool because of this

    complexity. Companies are managing hundreds of simultaneous innovation projects (P&G told

    me they manage at least 400 at any one time, and that means not just managing the science but

    also the customer input and the go-to-market pathways). And the numbers of growing.

    Fortunately, platforms are maturing to meet that need.

    # 4. Finally the Chief Innovation Office is proving its worth. Chief Inno Officers are often

    working on a shoestring but it is largely a new profession and a new office. They are beginningto prove themselves, and not just as cost-savers, a role they are often forced in to by platform

    vendors as much as by their own corporate culture.

    Many large companies now know cost-cutting has gone too far and that they need to re-open a

    space for innovation beneath the radar, among peers,, innovation on the bench, or from

    entrepreneurial service managers. Companies in fact are looking to design freedom back in,

    through the innovation office. Carefully!

    These four reasons convince me that 2013 innovation will be the exciting place for ideas and

    action. Innovation needs new thinking, though, so if it is not your area, maybe now is the time to

    switch.

    http://www.wikinvest.com/concept/Software_as_a_Servicehttp://www.wikinvest.com/concept/Software_as_a_Servicehttp://www.wikinvest.com/concept/Software_as_a_Servicehttp://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/06/26/microsofts-apple-killer-strategy-options/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/06/26/microsofts-apple-killer-strategy-options/http://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2012/06/26/microsofts-apple-killer-strategy-options/http://www.wikinvest.com/concept/Software_as_a_Service