ATC 기술자격시험 응시자참고자료 · 2015-01-22 · 에만수험번호.dwg파일에그내용이기록되게됩니다. 답안을다작성하시고도마지막에저장하지않고파일제출을할경우에는
4) ATC 2015 Assessment - Preliminary Needs Stakeholder · 1/4/2015 · 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010...
Transcript of 4) ATC 2015 Assessment - Preliminary Needs Stakeholder · 1/4/2015 · 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010...
atcllc.com
2015 10-Year AssessmentPreliminary Needs
Stakeholder and Customer Presentation – February 16, 2015
Josh Kerr
atcllc.com
Purpose
• Assumption reminders
• Summarize preliminary changes to needs
• Solicit input on needs
• Public Policy Requirements reminders
• Next steps
atcllc.com
Preliminary Key Messages
• Load forecast growth slightly higher in early years, but
has a slightly lower long-term growth rate relative to 2013
Assessment.
• Generation assumption changes
• Impacts of implementing TPL-001-4
• Continue to participate in Regional Studies
• Result - some need date changes, new needs, and
eliminated needs
atcllc.com
Core Assessment Studies
2014 TYA 2015 TYA
Model Year(s) Studied Model Year(s) Studied
Summer Peak2015, 2019, 2024,
2029Summer Peak 2016, 2020, 2025
Shoulder 2019, 2024 Shoulder 2020, 2025
40% Minimum Load 2015, 2019 40% Minimum Load 2016, 2020
atcllc.com 5
• 90/10 2025 Summer Peak
• No bias cases
• Generator Retirement Study
Sensitivities being analyzed
atcllc.com
Generator Retirement Study
• Assumptions– At least 50 years old by 2030– Primarily Coal or Diesel– Exclude conversions to natural gas, or pollution controls– Roughly 1,700 MW retired (study assumption only)– 2025 Summer All-Project Peak model– Power will be made up with imports into ATC
• Sensitivity being considered– Generators in the MISO DPP cycle added to retirements– Roughly 1,500 MW of generation added (study assumption
only)
• Not proposing additional projects
atcllc.com
Gen. Retirement Continued
Retirements (study
assumptions only)Additions
Biron, Dafter, Detour,
Edgewater 3 & 4, Escanaba,
Gladstone,
Kraft, Lakefront 5 & 6,
Manistique, Melissa,
Munising, Nelson Dewey,
Newberry Village, Portage,
Presque Isle, Pulliam, Shiras2,
Thilmany,
Weston 1 & 2, White Pine
• J293
• J384
• J390
• J394
• J395
atcllc.com
Generation Dispatch Changes
• Studies without Pulliam 5,6 and Weston 1
• ATC Net Interchange Comparison to 2014 TYA– 2016 Peak: 16 MW reduction to exports– 2020 Peak: 140 MW reduction to imports– 2025 Peak: 140 MW reduction to imports
atcllc.com
Preliminary Need Changes
• Potential needs – P2-1
• Low voltage at Charter – P3-2
• Overload at City Limits – Long lead time
• Low voltage near Boscobel
• Potential needs eliminated– 1 Generation increase isn’t materializing – 1 Need eliminated by resurveying line– 15 potential need eliminations, continued low load growth
atcllc.com 10
• Following Attachment FF Processes
• Previously Identified Requirements – State Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) Mandates– EPA Regulations– State Mandates and Goals for Energy Efficiency (EE) and Demand Side Management
(DSM) Programs– No New Requirements from the October 2014 Study Design review with stakeholders
• For the 2015 10-Year Assessment, assessing combined impacts using:– Expected Load Forecasts from LSEs– Generation Additions– Generation Retirements– Multiple Year Analysis over a range load levels
• Minimum• Shoulder• Peak• High Load Sensitivity
– Updating Potential Retirements Study
• Any public policy driven needs that may not be covered by the Assessment process?
Public Policy Requirements
atcllc.com
Process Status
• Completed 2014– Requested load forecast from LDCs– Sent final load forecast back to LDCs– Process and assumptions meeting– Suggested sensitivity studies
• Next Steps – Preliminary solutions meeting/presentation– Develop cost estimates– Draft study write-up– Complete multiple outage study– ATC review/approval – 2015 Assessment publication
atcllc.com 12
For more information, please contact David Smith
Phone: 920-338-6537
Email: [email protected]
Questions?
atcllc.com
Load Forecast Trends
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
15,000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
AT
C P
ea
k M
W (
Off
icia
l w
/co
-op
s &
mu
nis
)
ATC System Peak Demand Forecast Comparison
ATC Actual* Peak ATC Normalized Peak 2014 Forecast (reconciled)
2013 Forecast (reconciled) 2012 Forecast (reconciled) 2011 Forecast (reconciled)
Note: ATC peak data series prior to 2001 is estimated using ATC Top 5 customers' peaks and applying a typical diversity factor.
The "reconciled" forecast adjusts the LSE forecasts downward by 144 MW to account for load "netted" in the historic data but "load only" in the forecasts. This is done for comparative purposes only.