4 April 2011, Exeter Framework for Ocean Observing Eric Lindstrom, OOPC Chair 4 April 2011, Exeter...
-
date post
15-Jan-2016 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 4 April 2011, Exeter Framework for Ocean Observing Eric Lindstrom, OOPC Chair 4 April 2011, Exeter...
4 April 2011, Exeter
Framework for Ocean Observing
Eric Lindstrom, OOPC Chair4 April 2011, Exeter UK
2
Sponsorship• IOC Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO• GEO Group on Earth Observations• CEOS Committee on Earth Observation Satellites• POGO Partnership for Observation of the Global Oceans• SCOR Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research• SCAR Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research• GCOS Global Climate Observing System• GOOS Global Ocean Observing System• JCOMM Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine
Meteorology• PICES North Pacific Marine Science Organization• ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Sea• CoML Census of Marine Life• IGBP International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme• WCRP World Climate Research Programme
January 2011
Task Team Membership
April 2011
Input(Requirements)
Output(Data &
Products)
Process(Observations)
A Simple System
April 2011
RequirementRequirement
What to MeasureWhat to Measure
Essential Ocean Variables Essential Ocean Variables
IssuesIssues
Structure of the FrameworkStructure of the Framework
Dat
a A
ssem
bly
Dat
a A
ssem
bly
Dat
a P
rodu
cts
Dat
a P
rodu
cts
Issu
es I
mpa
ctIs
sues
Im
pact
ObservationsObservations
ArgoArgo
VOSVOS
SatelliteSatelliteConstellationConstellationSOOPSOOP
IOOSIOOS
SatelliteSatellite
… …… …
…
…
…
…
…
IMOSIMOS
April 2011
Framework: Societal Driver 2010
Weather & Climate•UNFCCC/IPCC
•WCRP
April 2011
Regional•Regional Seas•CCAMLR
Framework: Societal Drivers Next Decade
Fisheries•FAO•RFMOs
Ecosystem services/Biology•CBD•CSD•WSSD
Real-time services•Emergency support•Ocean forecasting
Assessments•Global Marine (UN)•TWAP (GEF)•Regional
Weather & Climate•UNFCCC/IPCC•WCRP•Climate services
RequirementsExpanded EOVs
Expanded observing systems and
networks
Dat
a P
rod
uct
s
April 2011
Readiness LevelsReadiness Levels
Concept:Initial articulation of ideas, and appropriatefeasibility studies. Increasing Readiness Levels
Attributes:Peer review of ideas and studies at science, engineering, and data management community level.
Pilot: Plans evolve from draft to projects andvetted in real-world implementation.
Attributes: Planning, negotiating, testing, and approval within appropriate local,
regional, global arenas.
Mature: Requirements, systems, and data become elements of the sustained global ocean observing system.
Attributes: Products of the global ocean observing system are well understood, documented, consistently available, and
of societal benefit.
January 2011
Key Concepts of the Framework
• Articulated for global sustained ocean observing systems• Designed for multidisciplinary approach• Builds on existing structures and best practices• Introduces “Essential Ocean Variables” as the common
language• Assesses “readiness” based on feasibility and impact –
integrates developmental activity (R&D) into the framework• Seeks to connect requirements setting process directly to
scientific and society needs (with feedback from products)• Systems approach better defines interfaces for all actors in the
framework, promoting collaborative alignment of independent groups/communities/networks
4 April 2011, Exeter
Aligning organizations to implement the Framework
• The team considered several approaches for governing the Framework– Characterized by Simplicity
– Based on Functional Needs
– Bring Stakeholders Together
– Nominal Operating Costs
• Requires ongoing engagement of international sponsors and other bodies
• Recommends establishment of a Framework Steering Group: representatives of international sponsors of OO’09, including WCRP– ephemeral, not permanent
– allow progress to more permanent governance structure
April 2011
Deep Ocean Observing Strategy (Workshop 3/30/11-4/1/11)
High Level Outline for Strategy built on FOO
• Rationale and science drivers (Climate, Carbon Chemistry, Biodiversity/Ecosystems)
• The Essential Ocean Variables for the deep ocean• Strategy for developing/improving recommendations• Strategy for observing: existing, scalable, and potential
observing networks and programs; addressing readiness• Strategy for data management and policy• Strategy to develop information to answer the questions
(rationale and science drivers)• Priorities [phased implementation]• Strategy for integration and development (roll-out of strategy)
April 2011
Deep Ocean Observing Strategy
Executive committee responsible for monitoring progress
• Eric Lindstrom (OOPC/FOO)Bob Molinari (WCRP/CLIVAR)Albert Fischer (OOPC)Kathy Tedesco (IOCCP)Bill Westermeyer (GCOS)Myriam Sibuet (post-CoML)
Initial Core writing [bold: co-leads]climate [could have sub-organization]Greg JohnsonStephen RiserBernadette SloyanBrian KingPatrick HeimbachDetlef Stammersea level: ?circulation: ? [include tracers]
carbon/biogeochemistryRik WanninkhofToste Tanhuabiogeochemistry, and interface with ecology/biodiversity[US: OCB]carbon capture/storage, sedimentary flows [Peter Haugen]
biodiversity and ecosystemscontacts developed from Myriam SibuetReggie Beach (NOAA ocean exploration)
April 2011
RequirementRequirement
What to MeasureWhat to Measure
Essential Ocean Variables Essential Ocean Variables
IssuesIssues
Structure of the FrameworkStructure of the Framework
Dat
a A
ssem
bly
Dat
a A
ssem
bly
Dat
a P
rodu
cts
Dat
a P
rodu
cts
Issu
es I
mpa
ctIs
sues
Im
pact
ObservationsObservations
ArgoArgo
VOSVOS
SatelliteSatelliteConstellationConstellationSOOPSOOP
IOOSIOOS
SatelliteSatellite
… …… …
…
…
…
…
…
IMOSIMOS
April 2011
Back-up Slides
4 April 2011, Exeter
OceanObs’09: calls for action
(1) Calls on all nations and governments to fully implement by 2015 the initial physical and carbon global ocean observing system originally envisioned at OceanObs’99, and refined at OceanObs'09.
(2) Calls on all nations and governments to commit to the implementation and international coordination of systematic global biogeochemical and biological observations, guided by the outcomes of OceanObs’09, and taking into account regional variations in ecosystems.
4 April 2011, Exeter
OceanObs’09: calls for action(3) Invites governments and organizations to embrace a framework for
planning and moving forward with an enhanced global sustained ocean observing system over the next decade, integrating new physical, biogeochemical, biological observations while sustaining present observations. Recommendations on this Framework, considering how to best take advantage of existing structures, will be developed by an post-Conference working group of limited duration.
(4) Urges the ocean observing community to increase our efforts to achieve the needed level of timely data access, sensor readiness and standards, best practices, data management, uncertainty estimates, and integrated data set availability.
(5) Asks governments, organizations, and the ocean observing community to increase their efforts in capacity-building and education.
17
Working Group terms of reference
The WG will consider the outcomes and recommendations from the OceanObs’09 Conference and, in consultation with the international organizations and expert advice, shall:– Recommend a framework for moving global sustained ocean
observations forward in the next decade; integrating feasible new biogeochemical, ecosystem, and physical observations while sustaining present observations; considering how best to take advantage of existing structures,
– Foster continuing interaction between organizations that contribute towards and are in need of sustained ocean observations, and
– Report back to its sponsors late 2010.
• 100% implementation of initial system by 2015, as called for by OceanObs'09.
• Deep ocean observations to address gap in monitoring of net transports of mass, heat and freshwater.
• Ocean reference stations - surface flux and transport stations in boundary currents to address gaps in understanding air-sea interactions in mid-latitudes and in regions where high spatial resolution is necessary; and for providing data for assimilating into weather, ocean and climate models and for assessing their products.
• Biogeochemical observations for carbon uptake and ecosystems - improve knowledge of dissolved oxygen and sea surface salinity- and the eternal note about improved coordination between satellite and in situ observations of key ECVs.
Priority for global ocean observing systems
April 2011
Framework Flow: Requirements
Framework Flow: Observations
Framework Flow: Data Products
January 2011
January 2011
Readiness Levels
Requirements Observations Data & Information
Framework for Ocean ObservingFramework for Ocean Observing
Need for informationidentified and characteristics determined. Feasibility study of measurement strategy and technology.
Measurement validated through peer review, implemented at regional and/or global scales and capable of being sustained.
The system is articulated, capability is documented and tested. Proof of concept validated by a basin scale feasibility test.
Following validation of observation via peer review of specifications and documentation, system is in place globally and indefinitely.
Data model is articulated, expert review of interoperability strategy. Verification of model with actual observational unit.
Measurement and sampling strategy verified at sea. Autonomous deployment in an operational environment.
Establishment of international governance mechanism, international commitments, and sustaining components. Maintenance and servicing
logistics negotiated.
Validation of data policy via routinely available and relevant information products.
Data management Practices determined and tested for quality and accuracy throughout the system. Creation of draft data policy.
LowestLowestReadiness Readiness
LevelLevel
Highest Highest Readiness Readiness
LevelLevel
MatureMature
PilotPilot
ConceptConcept
January 2011
• For Ocean Observing Communities– Focus on variables allows innovation, research, while sustaining
the key output of the observing system– Clear path to selling utility of observations to high level,
articulation of societal importance– learn from best practices and principles of other observing
systems– reduce/remove duplication of measurements– cross-disciplinary synergy: shared platforms, data systems– other data available to set your data in context
Benefits of the Framework
January 2011
• For Scientists– Measure once use many times– Consistent methods and standards– “One-stop-shop” that generates new scientific opportunities
• For Sponsoring Organizations– Improve the integration among the many independent
communities– Maximize cost savings and quality assurance– Enable the development of a wide range of information products– Development of a multi-faceted and interoperable elements – Increased utility of data within and external to the ocean
observing community– Facilitates identification of: new opportunities for integration,
redundancies, and gaps– Flexible response to future marine and societal issues
Benefits of the Framework
January 2011
• For Society– Core contribution from the science community towards ensuring
sustained ocean “services” – Improved response to issues impacting human health and
security– Improved response to issues impacting ocean ecosystem health– Generate a strong evidence base for decision making – Focus ocean science community attention toward investments in
sustained observing where societal need is the greatest– Assist in the evolution of coordinated prioritization for emerging
societal needs
Benefits of the Framework
• Aligning existing organizations to the framework– A central tenet of working group’s discussions was to build on
existing structures– needs sustained dialogue and negotiation amongst the
sponsors, transition over time– Framework articulates ‘best practices’ of a systematic approach,
a theory that needs to be put into practice– now in ‘roll-out’ phase soliciting feedback and input from the
sponsors (will come back to this)– Organizations need to articulate the function they would like to
play
Needs of the framework
• Education, outreach– culture of decision-making is often distant from scientific
knowledge– developing societal understanding of role of oceans in their lives,
the ocean-related threats, ecosystem services, and human-generated stresses on the oceans
– Formal education and outreach both important
• Capacity development– Develop local scientific infrastructure to support local decision-
making– Can be mainstreamed into development strategy
Needs of the framework