3.Theoretical Analysis 3.1.Oral Controlled Release...
Transcript of 3.Theoretical Analysis 3.1.Oral Controlled Release...
85
3.Theoretical Analysis
3.1.Oral Controlled Release Drug Delivery System
Definition:
It provides the continuous oral delivery of drugs at predictable and
reproducible kinetics for predetermined period throughout the course of
GIT.140
Advantages:
1.) Reduction in plasma drug level fluctuations.
2.) Reduction in adverse effects and health care cost.138
Polymers used:
These are broken down into biologically acceptable molecules that are
metabolized and removed from the body.
Poly (2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate)
PolyN vinyl pyrrolidine
Polyvinyl alcohol
Polyacrylic acid
Polyacrylamide
Polyethylene glycol
Additional Polymers3
Polylactides
Polyglycolides
Polyanhydrides
86
Natural Polymers
Albumin
Gelatin
Chitosan
Cellulose
Collagen
Continuous Release Systems
These release the drug for prolonged time with normal transit of dosage
form. Various systems are –
1) Dissolution Controlled Release Systems :
In this drug, particle is coated with polymer layer which controls the rate
of release of drug.
(i) Encapsulated Dissolution Control: The individual particles or
granules are coated with slowly dissolving material, compressed
directly into tablets as in spansules.141
(ii) Matrix Dissolution Control: Drug is homogenously dispersed
throughout a rate controlling medium which controls the drug
dissolution by controlling rate of dissolution fluid penetration into
matrix.
2) Diffusion Controlled Release Systems :
In this, diffusion of dissolved drug through a polymeric barrier occurs.
The two types are –
87
Reservoir Devices (Laminated Matrix Devices) :
In this, water insoluble polymeric material encloses a core of drug,
partitions into membrane and exchange with fluid surrounding
tablet and additional drug will enter the membrane diffuse to
periphery and exchange with surrounding media.141
Matrix Devices :
In this, solid drug is dispersed in a insoluble matrix and the drug
release is dependent on rate of drug diffusion and not on solid
dissolution rate.
88
3) Diffusion and Dissolution Controlled Release Systems:
Drug core is with partially soluble membrane where dissolution part of
membrane allows for diffusion of contained drug through pores in
polymer coat.
4) Ion Exchange Resins:
Resins are special granules passes ion active site for acidic/cationic
drugs.
5) pH Independent Formulation :
By mixing basic/acidic drug with buffering agents and finally coating
with GI fluid permeable film forming polymer.141
6) Osmotic Pressure Controlled Systems:
A drug fabricated by semi-permeable membrane is delivered by osmosis
through delivery orifice.140
89
The hydrodynamic pressure created squeezes the collapsible drug
reservoir to release medicament through delivery orifice.141
Delayed Transit and Continuous Release Systems:
These detain residence time in stomach by prolonging residence time in
GIT.
Altered Density Systems:
By altering density, the residence time of drug is prolonged.
Mucoadhesive Systems:
The bioadhesive polymer continuously releases a fraction of drug into
intestine over prolonged periods of time.
Size Based System:
Based on size, the gastric emptying is delayed allowing once daily dosing
Intestinal Release Systems:
Drugs designed to prevent destabilization in gastric pH.
Colonic Release Systems:
These are used in ulcerative colitis to deliver drug in colon.140
Currently Marketed Oral Controlled Release Systems:
1.) Coating tablets, granules and non pereil sugar beads.
2.) Matrix systems made of swellable or non-swellable polymers.
3.) Slowly eroding devices.
4.) Osmotically controlled devices.
90
3.2. Methods of Preparation of Nanoparticles
Definition of Nanoparticles:
Nanoparticles are defined as particulate dispersions or solid
particles with a size range of 10-1000 nm.
These are more reactive because of their greater surface area per
unit weight than larger particles.
Methods of Preparation:
1.) Preparation from natural macromolecules
2.) Emulsion Based method
3.) Coacervation method
4.) Salting-out methods
5.) Controlled Gelatin process
6.) Direct Precipitation method
Preparation of Nanoparticles from Natural Macromolecules:
By using proteins such as albumin, gelatin, leguminor vicillin and
polysaccharides such as alginates and agarose, a water in oil emulsion is
prepared and is subjected to subsequent heat denaturation or chemical
cross linkng of macromolecules. These proteins and polysaccharides
have a wide interest because of their properties of biodegradability and
biocompatibility.
91
Emulsion based Method:
In this process, emulsification of an aqueous solution of albumin
in vegetable oil142 (cottonseed oil) is carried at room temperature and is
homogenized. This highly dispersed emulsion is added to a large volume
of preheated oil at about 7120C under constant stirring.144 This leads to
coagulation of solid nanospheres of albumin by denaturation due to
immediate vaporization of water. Then, the suspension is allowed to cool
down at room temperature in an ice bath.
92
Coacervation Method :
This is a controlled desolvation method in which, nanoparticles are
produced by phase separation process in an aqueous medium and is
subsequently stabilized by crosslinking with Glutaraldehyde. This
method is mainly to overcome the utilization of large amount of organic
solvent to obtain nanoparticles.144
93
Salting-out Methods :
An aqueous phase of saturated electrolytes like Magnesium acetate
and Magnesium chloride with PVA as stabilizing and viscosity increasing
agent is added to acetone solution of polymer under vigorous stirring.
Electrolytes in aqueous phase prevent the miscibility of aqueous and oil
phases. The addition of aqueous phase is carried until a phase inversion
occurs to form o/w emulsion. Then, the equilibrium between the two
phases is disrupted by adding pure water sufficiently to allow complete
diffusion of acetone into water thereby, spherical nanospheres are
formed by polymer precipitation.145 This techniques permits the usage of
water miscible solvents like acetone and tetrahdyrofuran instead of
traditional chlorinated solvents and also avoids the usage of surfactants
to produce nanospheres. A broad spectrum of polymers including PLA,
94
methacrylic acid and co-polymers such as cellulose derivatives can be
employed in this technique.
Controlled Gelation Process :
By changing the pH, temperature or by addition of appropriate
counteriors in the protein or polysaccharides, phase separation is
induced in aqueous solution. In this, nanospheres are produced by
induction of divalent cation, calcium chloride and are stabilized by
polyelectrolytic complexation with a polyamine, poly (L-lysine).
95
Direct Precipitation Method :
In this, direct polymer precipitation is induced in an aqueous
medium with or without surfactant by progressive addition of polymer
solution under stirring without emulsification. The solvent is vaporized
under reduced pressure after nanoparticle formation. But completely
miscible solvents with aqueous phase, mainly acetone and also ethanol
and methanol should be only used for precipitation.
3.3. Standardization of Nanoparticles
Particle Size:
Particle size determines the in-Vivo distribution, biological fate,
tonicity and the targeting ability of nanoparticle system and also
influences drug loading, drug release and stability of nanoparticles. Due
96
to their smaller size and relative mobility, nanoparticles have relatively
higher intracellular uptake compared to the microparticles.
Desai et al. 146 found that 100 nm particles had a 2.5 fold greater
uptake that 1µm particles and 6 fold greater uptake than 10µm
microparticles in a caco 2 cell line.
Smaller particles have larger surface area where drug associated
would be at or near the particle surface leading to fast drug release.
Hence, the challenge is always to formulate the nanoparticles with
smallest size possible with maximum stability.
Currently, the fastest and most routine method of determination of
particle size is by Photon Correlation Spectroscopy or Dynamic Light
Scattering which requires the viscosity of medium to be known and is the
diameter of the particle determined by Brownian motion147 and Light
Scattering properties.
The results are usually verified by Scanning or Transmission Electron
Microscopy(SEM/TEM)
Scanning Electron Microscopy:
SEM is an instrument that produces largely magnified image by
using electrons instead of light to form an image. Electron gun produces
a beam of electrons which follows the vertical path through the
microscope between electromagnetic fields and lenses towards the
sample due to which electrons and X-rays are ejected from sample.
97
Detectors collect the X-rays, backscatter electrons and secondary
electrons and convert them to signal and produce a final image on
screen.
The water must be removed from sample before the water would
vaporize in the vaccum.
Surface properties of Nanoparticles:
Zeta potential of a nanoparticle reflects the electric potential of particles
and is used to characterize the surface charge properties and to
determine whether the charged particle is encapsulated within the centre
or adsorbed on to the surface of nanocapsule.
Drug loading:
2 methods – 1) Incorporation method
2) Adsorption/Absorption method
It depends on solid state drug solubility in matrix material or polymer.
Macromolecules of protein show greatest loading efficiency when loaded
at a point nearer to its isoelectric point.12 when it has minimum
solubility and maximum absorption.
Drug Release:
The drug release rate depends on:
1) Solubility of drug
2) Desorption of surface bound/adsorbed drug
3) Drug diffusion through matrix
4) Matrix erosion/degradation149
98
5) Combination erosion and diffusion process
Methods to study the in-Vitro release of drug are:
a. Side by side diffusion cells
b. Dialysis bag diffusion
c. Reverse dialysis bag technique150
d. Agitation followed by centrifugation
e. Ultrafiltration or centrifugal ultrafiltration technique
3.4. Evaluation of Bio-pharmaceutical Parameters
Pharmacokinetics is defined as kinetics of drug adsorption,
distribution, metabolism and excretion and their relationship with the
pharmacologic, therapeutic or toxicologic response in man and animals.
Pharmacokinetic Parameters:
1) Peak Plasma Concentration Cmax140: Expressed in mcg/ml
99
It is also known as Maximum drug concentration or peak height
concentration.
When Cmax is attained by a drug in the plasma, the absorption rate is
equal to the elimination rate of the drug.
We can calculate plasma concentration by using equation,
2) Time of Peak Concentration (Tmax)151: Expressed in hrs. It is
defined as the time taken for a drug to reach the peak concentration in
plasma.
Useful in estimating the rate of absorption.
tpeak = Ιn (Ka/Ke) / (Ka-Ke)
Cp = [ F*Dose*Ka (e-Ket – e-Kat) ] / V* (Ka – Ke)
100
3) Area Under the Curve (AUC): Expressed in mg/ml hr. It represents
the total integrated area under the plasma level-time profile and
expresses the total amount of drug that comes into the systemic
circulation after its administration.
Estimation of AUC : 1) By using trapezoidal rule
2) By integration method
4.) Half-Life (140,152): Defined as the time period required for the
concentration of drug to decrease by one half.
Ct = Coe-Kt
Co/2 = Coe-K/2 log Co/2 = log Co – Kt1/2/2.303
For Zero order : t1/2 = Co/2Ko
For First order: t1/2 = 0.693/K
Relationship between the elimination rate constant and t1/2 given by,
K=0.693/t1/2
Other equations used for calculating are, t1/2 = 0.693/K,
T1/2 = 0.693Vd/cl
5.) Absorption Rate Constant: Differential Equations, Drug amount to
be absorbed Xg
Drug in GIT → Drug in patient → Drug eliminated
Xg = F.Dose.e-Kat
Ka is calculated by using,
i) Method of residuals and
101
ii) Wagner Nelson Method
6.) Bioavailability16 : It is Defined as the extent or rate at which active
moiety enters systemic circulation thereby, accessing the site of action.
The most reliable measure of a drug‟s bioavailability is by measuring
AUC.
AUC α the total amount of unchanged drug that reaches systemic
circulation
Method of assessment of bioavailability :
Indirect/Pharmacokinetic Methods :
(i) Plasma data
a.) tmax
b.) Cmax
c.) AUC
(ii) Urine data
a.) dxu/dt
b.) xu
c.) tu
F → absolute bioavailability
Fr = [AUC]test * [dose]std / [AUC]std * [dose]test
F relative bioavailability
7.) Apparent Volume of Distribution152 : Expressed in litres
F = [AUC]oral * [dose]iv / [AUC]iv * [dose]oral
102
Apparent volume of distribution is the theoretical volume of fluid
into which the total drug administered would have to be diluted to
produce the concentration in plasma.
Given by Vd =
Vd = i.v bolus dose/Co
8.) Total Clearance151 : units of clearance rate clt → volume/unit time
Total clearance is the sum of metabolic clearance, renal clearance, etc. It
is constant for a given drug.
Rate of elimination of a drug from the body is directly proportional
to the plasma concentration.
dx/dt α Cp
dx/dt = clt . Cp
9.) Elimination Rate Constant : It is the sum of all individual rate
constants used to calculate the rate at which drugs are removed from the
system.
It is found by two methods : i) Excretion Rate Method
ii) Sigma Minus Method
103
4.Experimental Investigation
4.1.1 MATERIALS USED
1) Ciprofloxacin – procured from the Dr.Reddy‟s Labs, Hyderabad.
2) Amoxicillin – gift sample from Tiny Pharma, Tirupati
3) Ofloxacin-gift sample from Pharmafabrikon,Maduai
4) Ampicillin- gift sample from Pharmafabrikon,Maduai
5) Chitosan – gift sample from the Fisheries College and Research
Institute, Thoothukudi, TamilNadu, India.
6) Sepia officinalis (cuttlefish) ink – procured from fish vendors in
Thoothukudi and authenticated by Dr.R.Santhanam, Professor,
Fisheries College and Research Institute, Thoothukudi, India
7) Hydrochloric acid – Qaligens Fine Chemicals (GLAXOSMITHKLINE
PHARMACEUTICALS, MUMBAI).
8) Sodium acetate - Qaligens Fine Chemicals (GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS MUMBAI).
9) Calcium chloride (Sd Fine Chem Ltd., Mumbai).
10) Peptone – Merck Ltd., Mumbai.
11) Yeast extract - Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai.
12) Beef extract - Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai.
13) Sodium chloride – Sd – Fine Chem Ltd.,Mumbai.
14) Agar-agar Himedia Laboratories, Mumbai
104
4.1.2 INSTRUMENTS USED:-
1) UV- double beam spectrophotometer – Analytical Instruments
Pvt.Ltd.
2) Laminar Air Flow (Model No Car 1200 Clean air, Chennai)
3) Centrifuge - (R-24 Remi)
4) Sonicator
5) Dissolution Test apparatus – (TDT – 08L – Electro lab)
6) Scanning Electronic microscope
7) Zetasizer
8) FTIR (Analytical Instrument Pvt .Ltd.
9) Differential Scanning Calorimetry
Experimental animals used:-
1) Healthy Rabbits
Group I – 4Nos.
Group II – 4Nos.
4.2 General Physical Characterization of Sepia officinalis
4.2.1 Organoleptic properties :
Taste, colour and odour are observed using physical appearance..
Many of the properties are observed.
4.2.2 Particle Size analysis :
Eyepiece micrometer was first calibrated by using stage
micrometer which consists of 100 divisions. Each division of stage
105
micrometer = 10µm. A drop of given polymer solution was diluted with
water. The drop spreads over a glass slide and viewed through
microscope. The diameters of particles were measured and average
diameter average particle size was determined.
4.2.3 Bulk Density :
The sample was introduced into a graduated cylinder. Cylinder was
fixed on a table of bulk density apparatus and allowed to tap. The volume
of cylinder was noted and tapped for 500 times. If the subsequent
volume is reduced to some volume, then it is noted as the Bulk Volume.
The Bulk Density is given by mass per bulk volume.
4.2.4 True Density :
First an empty specific gravity bottle was weighed (w1). Then add
some amount of sample was added and it was weighed again(w2). Then w
the weight of specific gravity bottle + drug + water (w3) was observed.
Then the weight of the specific gravity bottle and water (w4) was noted.
True density of the polymer was determined.
4.2.5 Porosity :
25 ml of measuring cylinder was filled with a given powder and the
displacement liquid was added upto 12.5ml mark. All the liquid volume
of the powder was displaced. The flask was then emptied and the same
was filled with water upto 12.5 ml mark and its weight was determined.
Using these readings, bulk density and true density of given powdered
sample were calculated.
106
4.2.6 Angle of Repose :
The powder was poured through funnel and its height and radius
were measured.
4.2.7 Viscosity :
Viscometer was washed thoroughly with water and rinsed with
acetone and dried. The liquid was taken with the help of pipette and
interfused into viscometer from the broad end of viscometer. Then it was
sucked from other end. Then the liquid was allowed to flow by removing
the rubber till liquid reaches the mark. The time was noted with the help
of stop clock. After reaching lower mark of bulb.The Stop clock was
stopped. The density of liquid under test was determined.
4.2.8 Surface Tension :
Stalgamometer was cleaned well with water and rinsed with
acetone. A rubber tube was attached with a screw clip at top of
stalganometer to regulate the flow of liquid. The flattened end was dipped
in beaker containing liquid and sucked through rubber tube till the level
reached mark „A‟, when the screw clip was closed. Then the liquid was
allowed to fall from mark „A‟ to mark „B‟. This was repeated for three
times and was filled with test liquid and the no. of drops was counted
from mark „A‟ to mark „B‟.
4.2.9 pH determination :
The pH was determined by using a pH meter
107
4.2.10 Melting point :
The melting point of polymer was determined by using melting
point apparatus.
4.2.11 Solubility :
The solubility tests were performed by using different solvents.
4.3 ANALYTICAL METHODS
4.3.1 Estimation of Ciprofloxacin:
A spectroscopic method based on the measurement at extension at
530nm was used for the estimation of ciprofloxacin.
4.3.2 STD – Graph of Ciprofloxacin HCl in 0.1N HCl:
100mg of Ciprofloxacin HCl was first dissolved in little amount of
0.1N HCl and later made up to 100ml by using 0.1N HCl and further
dilutions were made by using 2ml of ferric chloride and 0.1N HCl to
obtain concentration ranging from 10 to 20 mg/ml.
The absorbance of solution was measured at 540nm using ECICO – UV –
Visible Spectrophotometer. The readings obtained is tabulated in Table
5.1. The standard curve of Ciprofloxacin HCl in 0.1N HCl is shown in
Graph 5.1
4.3.3 ESTIMATION OF AMOXICILLIN.
100 mg of Amoxicillin was taken and dissolved in 100ml of sodium
acetate buffer butter so that it contains 1000μg/ml. The latter was
diluted to have the concentrations of 10μg/ml, 20μg/ml, 40μg/ml 80
108
μg/ml, and 100μg/ml. The absorbance was observed under U.V. Visible
Spectrophotometer at 285nm.
4.3.4 ESTIMATION OF AMPICILLIN
The stock solution was prepared by taking 100mg of pure drug of
ofloxacin and dissolved in 100ml of 0.1N Hydrochloric acid to get
1000μg/ml.From the solution of 1000μg/ml,0.1ml.0.2ml,0.4ml,0.8ml
and 10ml samples were taken and diluted upto 10ml in volumetric flask
to get the concentration of 10,20,40,80,100 μg/ml respectively.The
absorbance was measured for the serial dilutios at 268 nm using UV-
Visible spectrophotometer
4.3.5 ESTIMATION OF OFLOXACIN
The stock solution was prepared by taking 100mg of pure drug of
ofloxacin and dissolved in 100ml of 0.1N Hydrochloric acid to get
1000μg/ml.From the solution of
1000μg/ml,0.1ml.0.12ml,0.14ml,0.16ml.0.18,0.20 and 10ml samples
were taken and diluted upto 10ml in a volumetric flask to get the
concentration of 10,12,14,16,18,20 μg/ml respectively.The absorbance
was measured for the serial dilutios at 293 nm using UV-Visible
spectrophotometer