3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM
Transcript of 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM
![Page 1: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
M. L. L. Wijerathne (Lalith)Hide Sakaguchi
Kenji OguniMuneo Hori
3D crack propagation analysis withPDS-FEM
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)The University of Tokyo
![Page 2: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Motivation
uniform tension
0.0 0.3-0.3 0.0 0.3-0.3…
Minor heterogeneity play a significant role
Necessary to consider minor local heterogeneitySize and distribution local heterogeneity cannot be measuredMonte-Carlo simulations with randomly distributed heterogeneity
Meshless or adaptive methods are to complicated for stochastic studies Difficult to introduce heterogeneity to the numerical modelSophisticated and computationally intensive
PDS-FEM provides simple means of modeling size and distribution of local heterogeneity with numerically efficient failure treatments
No two experiments generate identical crack profiles
![Page 3: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Organization
Discretization scheme and formulation of PDS-FEM
Failure treatment with torsional failure as an example
Dynamic model and kidney stone breaking as an example
![Page 4: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Smooth, overlapping interpolation functions
u1
u2
u3
Background: two models of deformable body
fracture
continuum
BVP
FEM / BEM / FDM DEM
equivalence to continuum is not verified and springs are mysterious
cont
inuu
m
Rig
id-b
ody
sprin
g
difficult to deal with failure
Numerically intensive failure treatment Efficient failure treatment
spring properties ?
![Page 5: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Discretization schemes of FEM and DEM
Ordinary FEM
Smooth and overlapping shape functions
DEM
Particles can be interpreted as non-overlapping shape functions
u1
u2
u1
u2
PDS-FEM: numerical method to solve BVP of a continuum with particle discretization
u3
discontinuities
![Page 6: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1-D particle discretization
αu∑=α
ααϕ )()( xx uud
fα is the average value taken over the domain ϕα
1−αϕ αϕ
mother points
)(xu
Domains between neighboring mother points
βψ 1+βψ
∑==α
ββψ )()()( xxx ggdxdf
An average value for derivative is obtained on a conjugate geometry ψα
βg
Function and derivative are discretized using conjugate geometries.
![Page 7: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
βψ
2D-Particle discretization
∑=α
ααϕ )()( xuxud∑==β
ββψ )()()( xgxgdx
xduj
dj
j
d
Voronoi tessellation for function u(x) Delaunay tessellation for derivative u,i(x)
αϕ
Function and derivative are discretized using conjugate geometries, Voronoi and Delaunay tessellations
1u2u
![Page 8: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Particle discretization for continuum: PDS-FEMBoundary Value Problem for Linear Elasticity
FunctionalOrdinary FEM functional
Functional used in PDS-FEM
∫ −−−=B jjijijijklijklijijijj dvubucuJ )(),,( ,2
1 εσεεεσ
⎩⎨⎧
∂==+
BuxuBxbxuc
ii
jilkijkl
on )(in 0)()),( ( ,
uB
B∂
∫ −+−+−−= dvucbuJ ijijijklijklijijjiijj )()()( ,, εδσεσδεσδδ
first variation
∫ −=B iilkijklji dvubucuI
21)( ,,u
u2
u3
u1
![Page 9: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Particle discretization for continuum: PDS-FEM
∑∫
∫∫∑′
′
′
′
′′ ==βαα
ααβ
βαββα
αα
αααα
ψ
ψϕψϕ
,,21
,21
,,ki
B
B lijklB jkiik uu
dv
dvcdvuuKJ
1. Functional
2. Conjugate discretization
3. determination of uα
4. With Voronoi and Delaunay tessellations, coincides with stiffness matrix of FEM with linear characteristic functions
∫ −−−=B jjijijijklijklijijijj dvubucuJ )(),,( ,2
1 εσεεεσ
αϕ ∑= )()( xuxu iiααϕ
∑= )()( xx ijijββψσσ
∑= )()( xbxb iiααϕ ∑= )()( xx ijij
ββψεε
∑= )()( xcxc ijklijklββ ψ
βψ
Voronoi Delaunay
αα ′ikK
![Page 10: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Organization
Discretization scheme and formulation of PDS-FEM
Failure treatment with torsional failure as an example
Dynamic model and kidney stone breaking as an example
![Page 11: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Failure treatment
⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
]k[]k[]k[]k[]k[]k[]k[]k[]k[
333231
232221
131211
]k[]k[]k[ indirect12
direct1212 +=
ϕ3
ϕ1
ϕ2
for direct interaction
for indirect interaction
stiffness matrix of FEM-βSpring properties are rigorously determined with material properties; E and ν
Failure is modeled by appropriately modifying the components of element stiffness matrix
ψβ
![Page 12: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ϕ1 ϕ2
ϕ3
ψβ
Failure treatment: modeling brittle failure
( )∑ Ψ= ′′
β
βαβββαααlijkljik bcbK
∫Ψ=
B jj dvb βαβ
βα ψϕ,1
CBBK T=
⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
=33
3
3
22
2
2
11
1
1
12
2
1
12
2
1
12
2
1
βαβα
βα
βα
βαβα
βα
βα
βαβα
βα
βα
bbb
b
bbb
b
bbb
bB
Candidate crack paths
No new DOFs or elements are introduced to accommodate the new crack surfaceComputational overhead is almost equal to re-computation of element stiffness matrix
an infinitesimally thin crack
ψβγ2
ψβγ1
ψβγ3
∫Ψ=
B jj dvd βγαβ
βγα ψϕ,1
⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
−000
0
2121
21
21
1111
11
11
12
2
1
12
2
1
αβγαβγ
αβγ
αβγ
αβγαβγ
αβγ
αβγ
ddd
d
ddd
d
![Page 13: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ϕ3
ϕ3
Failure treatment of PDS-FEM is approximate
No new DOFs or elements are introduced to accommodate the new crack surfaceCannot guarantee the satisfaction of BCs on new crack surface
PDS-FEM
new crack surfaces
No new nodes are introduced
ϕ2
FEM
One new node ad four elements are introduced
new crack surfaces
![Page 14: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Accuracy of approximate failure treatment: problem setting
Far field stress σyy
Accuracy of crack tip stress field with J-integral
∫ ∂∂
−=s
ji
ijijij dsnxuJ σεσ
21
yyσ
yyσ
![Page 15: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Accuracy of crack tip stress field
PDS-FEM crack tip stress filed is as accurate as the FEM solution, regardless of approximate failure treatment. The accuracy of crack tip stress filed can be improved by including rotational DOF
![Page 16: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Accuracy of rotational component
PDS-FEM estimates the rotational component fairly accurately, leading to better estimation of crack tip stress filed
![Page 17: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Example problem: torsion testing
Problem setting: torsion testing
E =70GPaν = 0.3
80 mm
φ15 mm
Real experiment Helical spiral fracture surface
![Page 18: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Example problem: torsion testing
Helical spiral fracture surfaceGhost layer
(computed using MPI)
![Page 19: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Organization
Discretization scheme and formulation of PDS-FEM
Failure treatment with torsional failure as an example
Dynamic model and kidney stone breaking as an example
![Page 20: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Time integration approaches for PDS-FEM
FEM like continuum representation N-body problem like particle representation
( ) ( ) 0 ., , 1
0
1
0
=+ ∫∫ dtqqqFdtqqLt
t
t
tδδ &&
∑∑ ′′+=+=α
αααα
α
αααijijii uuKuumVTH
21
21
&&
Candy’s method: 4th order symplectic
41)()(
11
11
, ..,ktatb
kkkk
kkkk
=Δ+=
Δ+=−−
−−
pPqqqFpp
qqqF
∂∂
−=)()( V
pppP
∂∂
=)()( T
ααii uq = ααα
ii ump &=
∑∑ ′′−=−=α
αααα
α
αααijijii uuKuumVTL
21
21
&&
Hamiltonian principle
Lagrangian based Hamiltonian based
Second order explicit algorithm(a range of Variational integrators)
![Page 21: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Simulating failure of concrete wall under tsunami load
Snaps of the experiment Damaged concrete wall
Conc. wall
Conducted at the LHC facility at the Port and Airport Research Institute , Japan
![Page 22: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Model details
Material parameters
2.45
m
2.7m
100mm
300x300mm100mmFixed boundaries
Concrete SteelE /(GPa) 30 210ν 0.2 0.3σt /(MPa) 5 400
Reinforcement mesh (φ6@200mm x 200mm)
A A
Section A-A
![Page 23: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Input data: pressure time histories at 5 heights
Locations of pressure gauges
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Pressure histories are interpolated for the intermediate points
![Page 24: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Crack patterns : front side of 100mm thick wall
![Page 25: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Crack patterns : back side of 100mm thick wall
Semicircular crack patterns of the front side are reaching the back
![Page 26: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Shockwave Lithotripsy: kidney stone breaking
Complete phenomena is not well explained Simulation of this mechanism would help further development of this technology
Ultrasonic pulse generator
X-ray source
Typical pressure history in water induced by a single ultrasonic pulse
Pressure pulse is focused into kidney
![Page 27: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Current studies of Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL)
Xufeng Xi and Pei Zhong, J of Acoust. Soci. Am. 2001
P-wave in Epoxy
High speed photoelasticity and ray tracing are used to find the possible high stress regions and the locations of crack initiationPredicting the crack path of this dynamic phenomena has not yet been done
![Page 28: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Interesting crack patterns in plaster of Paris samplesCylindrical Rectangular prism
Plane wave Plane wave
Crack initiation and propagation is due to a dynamic state of stressThis could be one of the toughest crack propagation problem to be simulated
![Page 29: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Simulation of SWL: problem setting
60
0 42 6 8 Time μs
0
20
40
MPa
4 μs
Input pressure pulse
48mm
50mm 48mm
12.7mm
14mm
Pressure pulse applied on this plane
~ 6 million elements~ 3.5 million DOFs
E = 8.875 GPaν = 0.228Vp = 2478 m/sVs = 1471 m/s
Plaster of ParisΚ= Vp = 1483 m/s
Water
Yufeng Zhou and Pei Zhong, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; 119(6) 2006
![Page 30: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Stress waves of σyy
vertical plane
horizontal plane
x
y
z
cylindrical sample
![Page 31: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Crack patterns at different sections of cylinder
f
t
t Kdt ≥−∫0
21 )( σσ
Tuler and Butcher failure criterion :
tσ tensile strength
-5mm -4mm -3mm -2mm -1mm
5mm 4mm 3mm 2mm 1mm
![Page 32: 3D crack propagation analysis with PDS-FEM](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022012413/616d1ce352491a0d700edfd1/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Summary
Particle discretization for continuum mechanics problemsuses a set of non-overlapping characteristic functions on conjugate geometriesnumerically efficient approximate failure treatmentaccuracy of crack tip stress field can be improved with rotational DOFparticle physics type dynamic simulations (i.e. a simplified N body problem)
We simulated several 3D crack profiles with complicated geometries