38°

19
38° 37.5° 37° 123° 122° 121° google: cisn shakemap nc http://www.cisn.org/shakemap/ nc/shake/

description

38°. google: cisn shakemap nc http://www.cisn.org/shakemap/nc/shake/. 37.5°. 37°. 123°. 122°. 121°. The Next Bay Area Earthquake. What to expect. What is the Hazard in San Jose?. Dr. John Boatwright, Bay Area Earthquake Alliance Co-Chair - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 38°

Page 1: 38°

38°

37.5°

37°

123° 122° 121°

google: cisn shakemap nchttp://www.cisn.org/shakemap/nc/shake/

Page 2: 38°

The Next Bay Area Earthquake

What to expectWhat is the Hazard in San Jose?Dr. John Boatwright, Bay Area Earthquake Alliance Co-Chair

Co-Regional Coordinator for Northern California US Geological Survey

Page 3: 38°

California urban areas areprisoners of the Plate Boundary

E-ASF Bay Area

Greater LA

North American Plate

Pacific Plate

Page 4: 38°

Pacific platePacific platePacific platePacific plate

North AmericanNorth Americanplateplate

North AmericanNorth Americanplateplate

40 mm/yr Farallons-Sierra Nevada

17171717

24242424

99996666

9999

15151515

2222

5555

7777

7777

Page 5: 38°

“We need to correct our style of architecture … to work a savings of untold sums of money in the future” - San Jose Mercury News

October 29, 1868

Hayward Earthquake

1868

Page 6: 38°

San Francisco

1906

Page 7: 38°

1989

Loma Prieta

Page 8: 38°
Page 9: 38°

Bay Area Earthquake History

1600-2000 A.D.

Page 10: 38°

Cum

ulat

ive

M0,

dyn

e-cm

Moment Accumulation in the SF Bay Region

Page 11: 38°

In the next 30 years there is a 63% prob-ability, nearly a 2/3rds chance, of an M6.7 or larger earthquake in the greater Bay Area. Hazard is highest in the East Bay due to the larger number of faults there, including the Hayward fault.(UCERF2 Report, 2007)

2007-2036

21%

31%

6%

3%

1%

3%63%

7%

11%

Page 12: 38°

M ≥ 6.7

Hazard is highest in the East Bay due to the larger number of faults including theHayward Fault.

Page 13: 38°

1868 Hayward

Earthquake

this ShakeMapis based on

damage reports-there were only

260,000 people in the Bay Area

38°

-121.5° -121°

the shakingwas strongest in San Leandro and Hayward

Page 14: 38°

14

Hayward Fault Earthquake:The Infrastructure Earthquake

Page 15: 38°

QuickTime™ and aH.264 decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Animation of Shaking from a M7.0 on the Hayward FaultSan Leandro Epicenter

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/simulations/hayward/

QuickTime™ and aH.264 decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and aH.264 decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 16: 38°

Losses by county - M7.0 scenario

16

Solano

Sonoma

Santa Clara

Santa Mateo

San Francisco

Marin

Contra Costa

Alameda

$0 $40B $80 $100

Economic Loss ($Billions)

Page 17: 38°

What will happen in the next large earthquake?

• Soft-Story Damage & Failures

• Fire Following Earthquake

Page 18: 38°

Soft-Story Buildings

18

soft-story retrofits in San Francisco are still voluntary

rather than mandatory

Page 19: 38°

1989 Favorable Fire Conditions

caused by soft-story failure