3854705
-
Upload
mohamed-nassar -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of 3854705
-
8/11/2019 3854705
1/5
-
8/11/2019 3854705
2/5
TOPOGRAPHICAL
NOTES
ON
THE
CENTRAL
CITY,
TELL
EL- AMARNAH
BY
H.
W.
FAIRMAN
IN
a well-known
passage
in
the so-called
early
text of the
Amarnah
Boundary
Stelae
(Stelae
K, M,
and
X),
Akhenatenenumerates
he
chief
buildings
which
he
will erect in
his
new
city.
The
precise
nature and
position
of
some
of these
places
is
still in
doubt,
and
dis-
cussion
of them would be out of
place
here,
but
the
opening phrases
of
the
building
passage
are
of no little
interest,
and
worthy
of
quotation.
The
followingcopy
is
based
on
my
own
collation
of
Stela
K
(Davies,
The
Rock Tombs
of
El
Amarna,v,
Pls.
xxix,
xxx),
with
a
few
restorations
rom
X,
and one or
two additional
estorationswhich
seem
probable,
and
which
are
inserted
for the sake
of
clarity
and
continuity.
1 1
1
1
2
(14)
.....
0[n]R (^
XaE-
11
^AQ0Ia,
(15)
I
3
4
Ca000
[JI), S17]
AntH[x0] S
q
0
q
k
il
T
5 6 7
?
(14)
...... I
am
making
a
House
of
the
Aten
for
the
Aten
my
father
in
Akhetaten
n
(15)
this
place.
I am
making
the
Mansion
of
the
Aten
for
the
Aten
my
father
in
Akhetaten
in
this
place.
I
am
making
the
Sunshade
of
Rec
of
the
[great] royal
wife
........ for the
Aten
my
father
in
Akhetaten n
this
place.
I
am
making
a
House
of
Rejoicingfor
the
Aten
my
father
in
the island
of
Aten
distinguished
in
jubilees
in
Akhetaten
n
this
place.
I
have
made
a
House
of
Re-(16)[joicing
of
the
Aten] for
the
Aten
my father
in the
island
of
Aten
distinguished
in
jubilees
in Akhetaten n
this
place.
In the following lines a brief discussion is given of those places mentioned in Akhenaten s
declaration whose
identification
with
excavated sites
in the
Central
City
is certain
or
probable, together
with
notes on
other
parts
of
the
same
area
which
it has
been
possible
to name. These
notes aim
solely
at
affording
a
preliminary
presentation
of
the
present
state
1
Restored from
X.
2
Battered but
certain.
3
The
top
of
the
sign
is
destroyed.
It is
difficult to
decide
whether
there
is room
for
-,
but
it
is
im-
probable
that
there
is
any
need
to
restore it-this
name
is
normally
spelt
with
the direct
genitive.
Sign
almost
completely
destroyed,
but it
must
obviously
be 1.
K
has e
clearly;
Davies
gives
_
by
mistake;
X
has .
6
A
mere trace
of
E-,
but it is
certain: X
has
7
slightly
damaged.
Both stelae have a lacunahere, but the restoration s sufficientto fill the
gap.
The name is
clearly
a
longer
one than
that of the
first
Pr-hcy.
This content downloaded from 193.227.1.127 on Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:20:07 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp -
8/11/2019 3854705
3/5
NOTES
ON
THE
CENTRAL
CITY,
TELL EL- AMARNAH
137
of
our
knowledge,
and
of the
theories
upon
which,
at
present,
we are
working.
A fuller
discussion
of these
and other
names,
together
with
copies
of the
inscriptions,
will
appear
in
due course
in
The
City
of
Akhenaten,
in.
1.
~
-
x
:n
q-
,
:
The Mansion
of the Aten. The
excavations
of 1931-2
have
proved that this is the smaller of the two Amarnah temples (cf. the preliminary report in
Journal, 18,
143-9).
The
identification
is
supported by
(a)
the
sign
E
which
is
stamped
on
many
of
the
bricks,
and
(b)
the
fact that this is
the
only
name
to
be
found on
any
of
the
237
portions
of
reliefs and
inscriptions
found and
registered.
The
building
is
clearly
a
product
of
the
early
Aten
period:
not
a
single example
of the late name of the
Aten
is known from
this
site.
It
would
appear
that the name Mansion of the
Aten
covers not
merely
the
temple
itself,
but
those
parts
of the
palace1
which lie
immediately
to
the north
of
it,
and
on
the
east
side
of
the
Royal
Road:
both
buildings
used bricks
stamped
~.
2.
[7
L
q
:
The House of the Aten. This is the
larger
of
the two
temples,
which was
finally
excavated
in
the
seasons 1932-4
(cf.
the
preliminary reports
in
Journal,
19,
113-18; 20,
129-36).
There
can be little
doubt about the
accuracy
of the
identification,
which is supportedby the evidence of the inscriptions,and by the strikingcorrespondence
between
the final
plans
and the
tomb-drawings
f the
temple.
Undoubtedly
each
portion
of
the
temple
originally
had its
own
name,
but at
presentonly
two
sections
can be named
with
any certainty:
(a)
The concrete
platforms
immediately
to the east
of the
second
pylon
are
probably
called
.X
~ q V~, q
~ q
,
,
The
House
of
Rejoicing.
(b)
The
sunken courts which
succeed the
platforms appear
to
bear
the name