36828-b00

8/10/2019 36828-b00

1/110

3GPP TR 36.828 V11.0.0 (2012-06)Technical Report

3rd Generation Partnership Project;

Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network;Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access E!UTRA";

#urther enhance$ents to %TE Ti$e &ivision &uple'T&&"

for &ownlink!Uplink &%!U%" interference $ana(e$entand traffic adaptation

Release ))"

The present document has been developed within the 3rdGeneration Partnership Project (3GPPTM) and may be further elaborated for the purposes of 3GPP.

The present document has not been subject to any approval process by the 3GPP Orani!ational Partners and shall not be implemented.

This "eport is provided for future development wor# within 3GPPonly. The Orani!ational Partners accept no liability for any use of this $pecification.

$pecifications and "eports for implementation of the 3GPPTMsystem should be obtained via the 3GPP Orani!ational Partners% Publications Offices.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

2/110

&eywordsUMTS, radio

3GPP

Postal address

3GPP support office address

650 Route des Luio!es - So"#ia $%ti"o!isVa!&o%%e - 'R$*

Te!.+ 33 2 2 00 'a/+ 33 3 65 16

'nternet

#tt"+.3"".or

Copyright Notification

o part may be reproduced ecept as authori!ed by written permission.The copyriht and the foreoin restriction etend to reproduction in all media.

* +,-+ 3GPP Orani!ational Partners (/"'0 /T'$ 11$/ 2T$' TT/ TT1).

/ll rihts reserved.

MT$4 is a Trade Mar# of 2T$' reistered for the benefit of its members

3GPP4 is a Trade Mar# of 2T$' reistered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Orani!ational Partners

5T24 is a Trade Mar# of 2T$' currently bein reistered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPPOrani!ational Partners

G$M6 and the G$M loo are reistered and owned by the G$M /ssociation

8/10/2019 36828-b00

3/110

o%te%ts

7oreword..........................................................................................................................................................

'ntroduction......................................................................................................................................................

- $cope......................................................................................................................................................

+ "eferences..............................................................................................................................................

3 8efinitions symbols and abbreviations..................................................................................................3.- 8efinitions...........................................................................................................................................................3.+ $ymbols...............................................................................................................................................................3.3 /bbreviations.......................................................................................................................................................

9 Objectives of study.................................................................................................................................

: 7easibility study.....................................................................................................................................:.- Methodoloies.....................................................................................................................................................

:.+ $cenario -.................................................................................................................................................... ........:.+.- 8eterministic evaluations...............................................................................................................................:.+.+ $ystem simulation evaluations.......................................................................................................................:.3 $cenario +................................................................................................................................................. .........:.3.- 8eterministic evaluations.............................................................................................................................:.3.+ $ystem simulation evaluations.....................................................................................................................

:.9 $cenario 3................................................................................................................................................. .........:.9.- 8eterministic evaluations.............................................................................................................................:.9.+ $ystem simulation evaluations.....................................................................................................................:.: $cenario 9................................................................................................................................................. .........:.:.- 8eterministic evaluations.............................................................................................................................:.:.+ $ystem simulation evaluations.....................................................................................................................

:.; $cenario :................................................................................................................................................. .........

:.;.- 8eterministic evaluations.............................................................................................................................:.;.+ $ystem simulation evaluations.....................................................................................................................:.< $cenario ;................................................................................................................................................. .........:.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

4/110

8/10/2019 36828-b00

5/110

'oreord

This Technical "eport has been produced by the 3rdGeneration Partnership Project (3GPP).

The contents of the present document are subject to continuin wor# within the T$G and may chane followin formalT$G approval. $hould the T$G modify the contents of the present document it will be re@released by the T$G with an

identifyin chane of release date and an increase in version number as follows?

Cersion .y.!

where?

the first diit?

- presented to T$G for informationD

+ presented to T$G for approvalD

3 or reater indicates T$G approved document under chane control.

y the second diit is incremented for all chanes of substance i.e. technical enhancements corrections

updates etc.

! the third diit is incremented when editorial only chanes have been incorporated in the document.

4%trodutio%

T88 offers fleible deployments without reEuirin a pair of spectrum resources. 7or T88 deployments in eneral

interference between 5 and 85 includin both basestation@to@basestation and 2@to@2 interference needs to beconsidered. One eample includes layered heteroeneous networ# deployments where it may be of interest to consider

different uplin#@downlin# confiurations in different cells. /lso of interest are deployments involvin different carriersdeployed by different operators in the same band and employin either the same or different uplin#@downlin#confiurations where possible interference may include adjacent channel interference as well as co@channelinterference such as remote basestation@to@basestation interference.

1urrently 5T2 T88 allows for asymmetric 5@85 allocations by providin seven different semi@statically confiureduplin#@downlin# confiurations. These allocations can provide between 9,F and >,F 85 subframes. The semi@staticallocation may or may not match the instantaneous traffic situation. The current mechanism for adaptin 5@85allocation is based on the system information chane procedure. /dditional mechanisms could include e.. dynamic

allocation of subframes to 5 or 85.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

6/110

1 So"e

The scope of this study item is iven in +H

2 Reere%es

The followin documents contain provisions which throuh reference in this tet constitute provisions of the present

document.

@ "eferences are either specific (identified by date of publication edition number version number etc.) ornon@specific.

@ 7or a specific reference subseEuent revisions do not apply.

@ 7or a non@specific reference the latest version applies. 'n the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (includina G$M document) a non@specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same

Release as the present document.

-H 3GPP T" +-.>,:? ICocabulary for 3GPP $pecificationsI.

+H "P@--,9:, $tudy 'tem 8escription for 7urther 2nhancements to 5T2 T88 for 85@5'nterference Manaement and Traffic /daptation

3 ei%itio%s, s7&o!s a%d a&&re9iatio%s

Delete from the above heading those words which are not applicable.

Clause numbering depends on applicability and should be renumbered accordingly.

3.1 ei%itio%s

7or the purposes of the present document the terms and definitions iven in T" +-.>,: H and the followin apply. /term defined in the present document ta#es precedence over the definition of the same term if any in T" +-.>,: H.

Definition format (Normal)

:.

example:tet used to clarify abstract rules by applyin them literally.

3.2 S7&o!s

7or the purposes of the present document the followin symbols apply?

ymbol format (!")

JsymbolK J2planationK

3.3 $&&re9iatio%s

7or the purposes of the present document the abbreviations iven in T" +-.>,: H and the followin apply. /nabbreviation defined in the present document ta#es precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation if any inT" +-.>,: -H.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

7/110

:&;eti9es o stud7

Objectives of the study item include?

7or the isolated cell scenario i.e. without co@channel interference?

"/- should evaluate the benefits of uplin#@downlin# re@confiuration dependent upon traffic conditions.

o 'dentify the proper simulation assumptions includin traffic models.

o /ssess the appropriate time scale for uplin#@downlin# re@confiuration.

o /ssess the benefits at least in terms of performance and enery savin.

"/9 should perform coeistence analysis with multiple operator deployments in adjacent channels.

7or the multi@cell scenario i.e. with co@channel interference?

"/- should evaluate the benefits of uplin#@downlin# re@confiuration dependent upon traffic conditions.

o 'dentify the proper simulation assumptions includin traffic models.

o /ssess the appropriate time scale for uplin#@downlin# re@confiuration.

o /ssess the benefits at least in terms of performance and enery savin.

"/- and "/9 should identify the multi@cell scenarios for which T88 85@5 interference may arise and

additional T88 85@5 interference mitiation would be beneficial.

o 8eployments comprisin the same or different uplin#@downlin# confiurations should be investiated.

"/9 should perform co@eistence analysis for the above identified scenarios includin co@channel and

adjacent channel interference where adjacent channel interference may be from other operator(s).

7or all the studies above deployment scenarios should include reular homoeneous macro deployments and

layered heteroeneous deployments.

7or both isolated cell scenario and multi@cell scenario?

'f sinificant benefits are identified by "/- evaluations "/- should identify potential air interface

solutions includin necessary 2T"/B2 measurements to mitiate 85@5 interference ta#in into

account the "/9 co@eistence analysis.

0ac#ward compatibility of "el@=B>B-, terminals should be maintained.

$pecification impact should be identified and assessed.

5 'easi&i!it7 stud7

5.1 Met#odo!oies

The followin two approaches are used for the feasibility study.

/pproach -? 8eterministic calculations mainly for 0$@0$ interference case

o Obtain the minimum reEuired site separation distance in certain scenarios when different T88

confiurations are applied in neihbourin cells.

o ,.=d0 de@sensitivity criteria is applied for neliible interference level for 0$.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

8/110

/pproach +? Monte 1arlo simulations for both 0$@0$ and 2@2 interference case

o Obtain the 85B5 eometry andBor throuhput to see the performance loss due to different T88

confiurations in the networ# based on the areed simulation assumptions.

7or approach + the difference of the 85B5 eometry with and without different T88 confiurations and the absolute

85B5 eometry with different T88 confiurations are used as criteria to evaluate the feasibility of applyin differentT88 confiurations in different cells. 7urther studies of the criteria are not precluded. 't is noted that the feasibilitystudy in this section assumes full buffer traffic model.

5.2 Se%ario 1

This scenario assumes multiple 7emto cells deployed on the same carrier freEuency. The simulation assumptions areincluded in /nne /.

5.2.1 eteri%isti e9a!uatio%s

The evaluation results usin the deterministic approach are shown in Tables :.+.-@- :.+.-@+ and :.+.-@3

Ta*le +,-,)!).Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa#

/ini$u$ separation distance k$"

Source ) Source - Source 3 Source 0 Source +

0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.05

ote+ t#e reere%e se%siti9it7 o 10M? is ta@e% as t#e 9iti ae"ta&!e i%terere%e, i.e. -8.5 d>

Ta*le +,-,)!-.Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa# ro Soure 6

/ini$u$ separation distance $"

"!aed i% 1st %e/ta"arte%t 2523.8

2%d %e/t a"arte%t 633.8

3rd %e/t a"arte%t 15.22

t# %e/t a"arte%t 3.

5t# %e/t a"arte%t 10.06

Ta*le +,-,)!3. Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa# ro Soure


Re1uire$ent ) 0.00

Re1uire$ent - 0.006

ote+ ReAuiree%t 1 ea%s 4%terere%e si%a! ea% "oer is d> !oer t#a% %oise !oorB ReAuiree%t 2 ea%s4%terere%e si%a! ea% "oer is t#e !e9e! i% d7%ai ra%e reAuiree%t.

5.2.2 S7ste siu!atio% e9a!uatio%s

The evaluation results by system simulations for scenario - are shown in 7iures :.+.+@- to :.+.+@;. The followin casesare simulated?

8/10/2019 36828-b00

9/110

1ase -? 0aseline is the transmission directions of all cells are the same

1ase +? The transmission direction of 7emto cells is randomly set as 85 and 5 with a :,F probability.

#e$to!#e$to co!channel with &% power control

-5 0 5 10 15 20 250

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry of femto UE(dB)

CDF

UL Geometry of HUE (co-channel)

Baseline: all Femto cells UL

Femto cells UL/DL random

-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL Geometry of femto UE(dB)

CDF

DL Geometry of HUE (co-channel)

Baseline: all Femto cells DL


#e$to!#e$to co!channel without &% power control

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry of femto UE(dB)

CDF

UL Geometry of HUE(co channel)

Baseline:all Femto cells UL


-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL Geometry of femto UE(dB)

CDF

DL Geometry of HUE(co channel)

Baseline:all Femto cells DL


#i(ure +,-,-!). Si$ulation results fro$ Source )


-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Femto-Femto UL geometry (Co-Channel)

UE UL SINR [dB]

Baseline:All Femto Cells UL

Femto Cells UL/DL Random

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 500

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Femto-Femto DL geometry (Co-Channel)

UE DL SINR [dB]

Baseline:All Femto Cells DL



8/10/2019 36828-b00

10/110

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Femto-Femto UL geometry (Co-Channel)

UE UL SINR [dB]

Baseline:All Femto Cells UL


-40 -20 0 20 40 60 800

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Femto-Femto DL geometry (Co-Channel)

UE DL SINR [dB]

Baseline:All Femto Cells DL


#i(ure +,-,-!-. Si$ulation results fro$ Source -


-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel, without interference management

Ful:FUL

Ful:FR

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel, without interference management

Fdl:FDL

Fdl:FR

#i(ure +,-,-!3. Si$ulation results fro$ Source 3

#e$to!#e$to co!channel with and without &% power control



8/10/2019 36828-b00

11/110

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 400

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

FUE UL SINR, Co-channel, Femto Tx Power -10 dBm

FUE: 100% UL Femto

FUE: 20% DL+80% UL Femto





-40 -20 0 20 40 600

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

FUE DL SINR, Co-channel, Femto Tx Power -10 dBm






FUE: 100% DL Femto


-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 400

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

FUE UL SINR, Co-channel, Femto Tx Power 20 dBm

FUE: 100% UL Femto


FUE: 40% DL+60% UL FemtoFUE: 50% DL+50% UL Femto



-40 -20 0 20 40 600

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

FUE DL SINR, Co-channel, Femto Tx Power 20 dBm



FUE: 50% DL+50% UL FemtoFUE: 60% DL+40% UL Femto


FUE: 100% DL Femto

#i(ure +,-,-!+. Si$ulation results fro$ Source +



8/10/2019 36828-b00

12/110


5.3 Se%ario 2

This scenario assumes multiple 7emto cells deployed on the same carrier freEuency and multiple Macro cells deployedon an adjacent carrier freEuency where all Macro cells have the same 5@85 confiuration and 7emto cells can adjust5@85 confiuration. The simulation assumptions are included in /nne /.


The evaluation results usin the deterministic approach are shown in Tables :.3.-@- to :.+.-@:.

Ta*le +,3,)!).Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa#

a((ressor !victi$

A((ressor T' powerd4$"

5icti$ Accepta*le 6nterference

d4$"

/ini$u$ separation distancek$"

Source ) 7 -Source 3 7 0 7 +

'eto -CMaro 20 -106.5 0.05 0.08

Maro -C'eto 6 -8.5 0.1 0.1

Ta*le +,3,)!-.Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa# ro Soure 6

a((ressor !victi$

$ini$u$ distance R k$"

1st ad;ae%t #a%%e!Maro-C'eto 0.

'eto-CMaro 0.16

2%d ad;ae%t#a%%e!

Maro-C'eto 0.36

'eto-CMaro 0.12

S"urious doai%Maro-C'eto 0.16

'eto-CMaro 0.05

8/10/2019 36828-b00

13/110

Ta*le +,3,)!3. Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa# ro Soure

a((ressor ! victi$/ini$u$ separation distancek$"

Re1uire$ent ) Re1uire$ent -

Maro-C 'eto 0.1 0.003

'eto -CMaro 0.08 0.00


Ta*le +,3,)!0+ ReAuired $dditio%a! 4so!atio%, 4S D 500 ro Soure 8

&eplo8$ent Scenarios4S!4S 6solation

d4"Notes

Maro-'eto

o-#a%%e! 1.2 d> 4%door >S it# 20d> a!! !oss

$d;ae%t #a%%e! - 25.8 d>

o% $d;ae%t #a%%e! -31.8 d>

Ta*le +,3,)!++ ReAuired $dditio%a! 4so!atio%, 4S D 132 ro Soure 8


d4"Notes

Maro-'eto

o-#a%%e! - 1.1 d> 4%door >S it# 20d> a!! !oss

$d;ae%t #a%%e! - 6.1 d>

o% $d;ae%t #a%%e! - 52.1 d>


The evaluation results by system simulations for scenario + are shown in 7iures :.3.+@- to :.3.+@;. The followin cases

are simulated?

1ase -? 0aseline is the transmission directions of all cells (includin Macro and 7emto) are the same.

1ase +? /ll Macro cells are of the same transmission direction (i.e. either 85 or 5) and the transmission

direction of 7emto cells is randomly set as 85 and 5 with a :,F probability.

#e$to!/acro adjacent channel without &% power control

8/10/2019 36828-b00

14/110

-5 0 5 10 15 20 250

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry(dB)

CDF

UL Geometry (adjacent channel)

MUE baseline: all Macro and Femto cells UL

HUE baseline: all Macro and Femto cells UL

MUE: all Macro cells UL and Femto cells UL/DL random

HUE: all Macro cells UL and Femto cells UL/DL random

HUE: all Macro cells DL and Femto cells UL/DL random

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL Geometry(dB)

CDF

DL Geometry (adjacent channel)

MUE baseline: all Macro and Femto cells DL

HUE baseline: all Macro and Femto cells DL

MUE: all Macro cells DL and Femto cells UL/DL random



#i(ure +,3,-!). Si$ulation results fro$ Source )


-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Hetnet UL geometry (Adj-Channel)

UE UL SINR[dB]

MUE Baseline:All Macro and LPN Cells UL

LPN UE Baseline:All Macro and LPN Cells UL

MUE:All Macro Cells UL and LPN Cells UL/DL Random

LPN UE:All Macro Cells UL and LPN Cells UL/DL Random

LPN UE:All Macro Cells DL and LPN Cells UL/DL Random

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 500

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Hetnet DL geometry (Adj-Channel)

UE DL SINR[dB]

MUE Baseline:All Macro and LPN Cells DL

LPN UE Baseline:All Macro and LPN Cells DL

MUE:All Macro Cells DL and LPN Cells UL/DL Random




-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Hetnet UL geometry (Adj-Channel)

UE UL SINR[dB]

MUE Baseline:All Macro and LPN Cells UL

LPN UE Baseline:All Macro and LPN Cells UL

MUE:All Macro Cells UL and LPN Cells UL/DL Random



-40 -20 0 20 40 60 800

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Hetnet DL geometry (Adj-Channel)

UE DL SINR[dB]

MUE Baseline:All Macro and LPN Cells DL

LPN UE Baseline:All Macro and LPN Cells DL

MUE:All Macro Cells DL and LPN Cells UL/DL Random



#i(ure +,3,-!-. Si$ulation results fro$ Source -


8/10/2019 36828-b00

15/110

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF

Adj-channel, without interference management

Mul:MUL/FUL

Ful:MUL/FUL

Mul:MUL/FR

Ful:MUL/FR

Ful:MDL/FR

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF

Adj-channel, without interference management

Mdl:MDL/FDL

Fdl:MDL/FDL

Mdl:MDL/FR

Fdl:MDL/FR

Fdl:MUL/FR

#i(ure +,3,-!3. Si$ulation results fro$ Source 3


#e$to!/acro adjacent channel with &% power control


#e$to!/acro adjacent channel with &% power control

8/10/2019 36828-b00

16/110

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE UL SINR, Adjacent Channel, Femto Tx Power -10dBm

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% UL Femto

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Femto

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

FUE UL SINR, Adjacent Channel, Femto Tx Power -10dBm

FUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% UL Femto

FUE: 100% DL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Femto

FUE: 100% UL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Femto

-10 0 10 20 30 400

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE DL SINR, Adjacent Channel, Femto Tx Power -10dBm

MUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% DL Femto

MUE: 100% DL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Femto

-10 0 10 20 30 400

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

FUE DL SINR, Adjacent Channel, Femto Tx Power -10dBm

FUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% DL Femto




-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE UL SINR, Adjacent Channel, Femto Tx Power 20 dBm



-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE DL SINR, Adjacent Channel, Femto Tx Power 20 dBm



8/10/2019 36828-b00

17/110

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

FUE UL SINR, Adjacent Channel, Femto Tx Power 20 dBm




-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CD

F

SINR, dB

FUE DL SINR, Adjacent Channel, Femto Tx Power 20 dBm




#i(ure +,3,-!+. Si$ulation results fro$ Source +



5. Se%ario 3

This scenario assumes multiple outdoor Pico cells deployed on the same carrier freEuency. The simulation assumptionsare included in /nne /.

5..1 eteri%isti e9a!uatio%s

The evaluation results usin the deterministic approach are shown in Tables :.9.-@- and :.9.-@+.


a((ressor ! victi$Pathloss

$odel

A((ressor T'powerd4$"

5icti$ accepta*leinterference d4$"

/ini$u$ separationdistance k$"

Sources ) 9 :

8/10/2019 36828-b00

18/110

:utdoor Pio-Coutdoor Pio

L:S

2 -8.5

5.8

L:S 0.12

Ta*le+,0,)!-. Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa# ro Soure 8

ote+

ReAuiree%t 1 ea%s 4%terere%e si%a! ea% "oer is d> !oer t#a% %oise !oorB ReAuiree%t 2ea%s 4%terere%e si%a! ea% "oer is t#e !e9e! i% d7%ai ra%e reAuiree%t.

5..2 S7ste siu!atio% e9a!uatio%s

The evaluation results by system simulations for scenario 3 are shown in 7iures :.9.+@- to :.3.+@>. The followin cases

are simulated?


1ase +? The transmission direction of outdoor Pico cells is randomly set as 85 or 5 with a :,F probability.

1ase 3 (optional)? Pico with interference manaement. The transmission direction of outdoor Pico cells shall

be controlled by the interference manaement method.

Pico!Pico co!channel without an8 interference $iti(ation sche$e

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry(dB)

CDF

UL Geometry (co-hannel)

Baseline: all Pico cells UL

Pico cells UL/DL random

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL Geometry(dB)

CDF

DL Geometry (co-channel)

Baseline: all Pico cells DL


Pico!Pico co!channel with interference $iti(ation sche$e

a((ressor ! victi$


Pathloss ! %S Pathloss ! N%S

ReAuiree%t 1 ReAuiree%t 2 ReAuiree%t 1 ReAuiree%t 2

:utdoor Pio-C:utdoor Pio 5.80 1.230 0.120 0.025

8/10/2019 36828-b00

19/110

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry(dB)

CDF


Baseline: all Pico cells UL


Threshold Y=60dB

Threshold Y=70dB

Threshold Y=80dB



-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1UL Geometry (co-channel)

SINR [dB]

CDF


Baseline: all pico cells UL

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1DL Geometry (co-channel)

SINR [dB]

CDF

Baseline: all pico cells DLPico cells UL/DL random



-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Outdoor Pico - Outdoor Pico deployment (Co-Channel)

UL Geometry[dB]

Baseline: Pico All UL

Pico UL/DL Random

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Outdoor Pico - Outdoor Pico deployment (Co-Channel)

DL Geometry[dB]

Baseline: Pico All DL

Pico UL/DL Random


8/10/2019 36828-b00

20/110




-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel, without interference managment

Pul:PUL

Pul:PR

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel, without interference managment

Pdl:PDL

Pdl:PR

Pico!Pico co!channel with interference $iti(ation sche$e

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 250

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel, with interference managment

Pul:PUL

Pul:PR

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF


Pdl:PDL

Pdl:PR


Pico!Pico adjacent channel with and without interference $iti(ation sche$e

8/10/2019 36828-b00

21/110



ote -H? 'n all these simulations 2s are connected to Pico base stations.

ote +H? Pico cells 5B85 random in above fiures refers to the case where the transmission direction of a Pico cell is

randomly set as 85 or 5 with a probability of :,F.

#i(ure +,0,-!:. Si$ulation results fro$ source :


8/10/2019 36828-b00

22/110

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CDF

SINR, dB

PUE U% S 6NR< =o!=hannel

100% UL Pico

50% UL+50% DL Pico

50% UL Pico, 50% Pico Off

50% DL Pico, 50% Pico Off

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CDF

SINR, dB

PUE &% S6NR< =o!=hannel

100% DL Pico

50% UL+50% DL Pico

50% UL Pico, 50% Pico Off

50% DL Pico, 50% Pico Off

#i(ure +,0,-!>. Si$ulation results fro$ Source >


-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

UL geometry [dB]

CDF[%]

Outdoor Pico - Ourdoor Pico, UL Geometry (co-channel)

baseline:all pico cells DL

pico cells UL/DL random

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DL geometry [dB]

CDF[%]

Outdoor Pico - Ourdoor Pico,DL Geometry (co-channel)

baseline:all pico cells UL

pico cells UL/DL random

#i(ure +,0,-!?. Si$ulation results fro$ Source ?

5.5 Se%ario

This scenario assumes multiple outdoor Pico cells deployed on the same carrier freEuency and multiple Macro cells

deployed on an adjacent carrier freEuency where all Macro cells have the same 5@85 confiuration and outdoor Picocells can adjust 5@85 confiuration. The simulation assumptions are included in /nne /.


The evaluation results usin the deterministic approach are shown in Tables :.:.-@- to :.:.-@:.

Ta*le +,+,)!).Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa#

a((ressor !

victi$

Pathloss

$odel

A((ressor T'power

d4$"

5icti$ accepta*le

interference d4$"

/ini$u$ separationdistance

k$"

Source ) 9 + Source 2

8/10/2019 36828-b00

23/110

:utdoor Pio

-CMaro

L:S

2 -106.5

1.5 0.3

L:S 0.33 0.33

Maro >S

-Coutdoor Pio

L:S

6 -8.5

.68 .68

L:S 0. 0.

Ta*le +,+,)!-.Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa# ro Soure

1st ad;ae%t #a%%e!

a((ressor !victi$

used path loss $odel $ini$u$ distance R k$"

Maro-CPio100.23.5!o10(R) .68

125.236.3!o10(R) 0.

Pio-CMaro

100.23.5!o10(R) 1.5

125.236.3!o10(R) 0.32

2%d ad;ae%t#a%%e!

Maro-CPio100.23.5!o10(R) .

125.236.3!o10(R) 0.58

Pio-CMaro100.23.5!o10(R) 1.1

125.236.3!o10(R) 0.2

S"urious doai%

Maro-CPio100.23.5!o10(R) 1.32

125.236.3!o10(R) 0.25

Pio-CMaro100.23.5!o10(R) 0.33

125.236.3!o10(R) 0.1

Ta*le +,+,)!3.Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa# ro Soure 8

a((ressor ! victi$


Pathloss ! %S Pathloss ! N%S

ReAuiree%t 1ReAuiree%t 2ReAuiree%t 1ReAuiree%t 2

Maro-CPio .6 0.55 0.8 0.13

Pio-CMaro 1.3 0.138 0.325 0.058


Ta*le +,+,)!0. ReAuired $dditio%a! 4so!atio%, 4S D 500 ro Soure


d4"Notes

Maro-:utdoorPio

o-#a%%e! 6. d> L:S "at# !oss ode! is used

$d;ae%t #a%%e! 1. d>

8/10/2019 36828-b00

24/110

o% $d;ae%t #a%%e! - .3 d>

Ta*le +,+,)!+. ReAuired $dditio%a! 4so!atio%, 4S D 132 ro Soure

&eplo8$ent Scenarios

4S!4S 6solation

d4" Notes

Maro-:utdoorPio

o-#a%%e! 2.1 d> L:S "at# !oss ode! is used

$d;ae%t #a%%e! - 1. d>

o% $d;ae%t #a%%e! - 23. d>


The evaluation results by system simulations for scenario 9 are shown in 7iures :.:.+@- to :.:.+@>. The followin cases

are simulated?


1ase +? The transmission direction of outdoor Pico cells is randomly set as 85 or 5 with a :,F probability.

1ase 3 (optional)? Pico with interference manaement. The transmission direction of outdoor Pico cells shall

be controlled by the interference manaement method

Pico!/acro adjacent channel without an8 interference $iti(ation sche$e

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry(dB)

CDF


MUE baseline: all Macro and Pico cells UL

PUE baseline: all Macro and Pico cells UL

MUE: all Macro cells UL and Pico cells UL/DL random

PUE: all Macro cells UL and Pico cells UL/DL random

PUE: all Macro cells DL and Pico cells UL/DL random

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL Geometry(dB)

CDF

DL Geometry (adjacent channel)

MUE baseline: all Macro and Pico cells DL

PUE baseline: all Macro and Pico cells DL

MUE: all Macro cells DL and Pico cells UL/DL random



Pico!/acro adjacent channel with interference $iti(ation sche$e

8/10/2019 36828-b00

25/110

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry(dB)

CDF






MUE: all Macro cells UL and Pico cells threshold X=70,Y=80dB

PUE: all Macro cells UL and Pico cells threshold X=70,Y=80dB

PUE: all Macro cells DL and Pico cells threshold X=70,Y=80dBPUE: all Macro cells DL and Pico cells UL/DL random

#i(ure +,+,-!). Si$ulation results fro$ Source )


-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1UL Geometry (adjacent channel)

SINR [dB]

CDF

PUE: all macro cells UL and pico cells UL/DL random

PUE Baseline: all pico and macro cells UL

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1DL Geometry (adjacent channel)

SINR [dB]

CDF

Baseline: all macro and pico cells DL

PUE: all macro cells DL and pico cells UL/DL random

#i(ure +,+,-!-. Si$ulation results fro$ Source -


8/10/2019 36828-b00

26/110

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Macro - Outdoor Pico deployment (Adjacent-Channel)

UL Geometry[dB]

Macro UE Baseline: Macro and Pico All UL

Pico UE Baseline: Macro and Pico All UL

Macro UE: Macro All UL, Pico UL/DL Random

Pico UE: Macro All UL, Pico UL/DL Random

Pico UE: Macro All DL, Pico UL/DL Random

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CDF[%]

Macro - Outdoor Pico deployment (Adjacent-Channel)

DL Geometry[dB]

Macro UE Baseline: Macro and Pico All DL

Pico UE Baseline: Macro and Pico All DL

Macro UE: Macro All DL, Pico UL/DL Random

Pico UE: Macro All DL, Pico UL/DL Random

Pico UE: Macro All UL, Pico UL/DL Random

#i(ure +,+,-!3. Si$ulation results fro$ Source 3




-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF

Adj-channel, without interference managment

Mul:MUL/PUL

Pul:MUL/PUL

Mul:MUL/PR

Pul:MUL/PR

Pul:MDL/PR

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF

Adj-channel, without interference managment

Mdl:MDL/PDL

Pdl:MDL/PDL

Mdl:MDL/PR

Pdl:MDL/PR

Pdl:MUL/PR


8/10/2019 36828-b00

27/110

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF

Adj-channel, with interference managment

Mul:MUL/PUL

Pul:MUL/PUL

Mul:MUL/PR

Pul:MUL/PR

Pul:MDL/PR

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF

Adj-channel, with interference managment

Mdl:MDL/PDL

Pdl:MDL/PDL

Mdl:MDL/PR

Pdl:MDL/PR

Pdl:MUL/PR

#i(ure +,+,-!+. Si$ulation results fro$ Source +

/acro!Pico adjacent channel with@without an8 interference $iti(ation sche$e


Pico!/acro adjacent channel without interference $iti(ation sche$e

8/10/2019 36828-b00

28/110

ote -H? Pico cells 5B85 random in above fiures refers to the case where the transmission direction of a Picocell is randomly set as 85 or 5 with a probability of :,F.

#i(ure +,+,-!:. Si$ulation results fro$ Source :


-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE UL SINR, Adjacent Channel

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 100%UL Pico

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 50%UL+50%DL Pico

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% DL Pico

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

PUE UL SINR, Adjacent Channel

PUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% UL Pico

PUE, 100% DL Macro, 100%UL Pico

PUE: 100% UL Macro, 50%UL+50%DL Pico

PUE: 100% DL Macro, 50%UL+50%DL Pico

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

C

DF

SINR, dB

MUE DL SINR, Adjacent Channel

MUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% DL Pico

MUE: 100% DL Macro, 50%UL+50%DL Pico

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CDF

SINR, dB

PUE DL SINR, Adjacent Channel

PUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% DL Pico

PUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% DL Pico

PUE: 100% DL Macro, 50%UL+50%DL Pico

PUE: 100% UL Macro, 50%UL+50%DL Pico

#i(ure +,+,-!>. Si$ulation results fro$ Source >


8/10/2019 36828-b00

29/110

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

UL geometry [dB]

CDF[%]

Macro - Outdoor Pico (Adjacent channel)

MUE baseline: all UL

PUE baseline: all UL

MUE: pico random UL/DL

PUE: macro UL,pico random UL/DL

PUE:macro DL, pico random UL/DL

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DL geometry [dB]

CDF[%]


MUE baseline:all DL

PUE baseline: all DL

MUE:macro DL,pico random UL/DLPUE:macro DL,pico random UL/DL

PUE:macro UL,pico random UL/DL


-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 00

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

UL geometry [dB]

CDF[%]


MUE baseline: all UL

PUE baseline: all UL

MUE: pico random UL/DL

MUE: pico random UL/DL Interf. Mitig.

PUE: macro UL,pico random UL/DL

PUE:macro UL,pico random UL/DL, interf Mitig.

PUE:macro DL, pico random UL/DL

PUE:macro DL,pico random UL/DL, interf Mitig.

#i(ure +,+,-!?. Si$ulation results fro$ Source ?

5.6 Se%ario 5

This scenario assumes multiple 7emto cells and multiple Macro cells deployed on the same carrier freEuency where allMacro cells have the same 5@85 confiuration and 7emto cells can adjust 5@85 confiuration. The simulation

assumptions are included in /nne /.


The evaluation results usin the deterministic approach are shown in Table :.;.-@-.


a((ressor !victi$

A((ressor T'power

d4$"

5icti$ cell accepta*le interferenced4$")

/ini$u$ 4S separationdistance

k$"

8/10/2019 36828-b00

30/110

Sources ) 9 0

'eto -CMaro 20 -106.5 0.6

Maro -C'eto 6 -8.5 2.0


The evaluation results by system simulations for scenario : are shown in 7iures :.;.+@- to :.;.+@:. The followin casesare simulated?

1ase -? 0aseline is the transmission directions of all cells (includin Macro and 7emto) are the same.

1ase +? /ll Macro cells are of the same transmission direction (i.e. either 85 or 5) and the transmission

direction of 7emto cells is randomly set as 85 and 5 with a :,F probability.

#e$to!/acro co!channel with #e$to &% power control



-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry(dB)

CDF

UL Geometry (co-channel)

MUE baseline: all Macro and Femto cells ULHUE baseline: all Macro and Femto cells UL

MUE: all Macro cells UL and Femto cells UL/DL random



-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL Geometry(dB)

CDF


MUE baseline: all Macro and Femto cells DL

HUE baseline: all Macro and Femto cells DL

MUE: all Macro cells DL and Femto cells UL/DL random




8/10/2019 36828-b00

31/110

#e$to!/acro co!channel without #e$to &% power control

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel

Mul:MUL/FUL

Ful:MUL/FUL

Mul:MUL/FRFul:MUL/FR

Ful:MDL/FR

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 800

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel

Mdl:MDL/FDL

Fdl:MDL/FDL

Mdl:MDL/FRFdl:MDL/FR

Fdl:MUL/FR



-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE UL SINR, Co-Channel, Femto Tx Power 20 dBm



MUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% DL Femto

-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CDF

SINR, dB

FUE UL SINR, Co-Channel, Femto Tx Power 20 dBm

HUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% UL Femto

HUE: 100% UL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Femto

HUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% UL Femto

HUE: 100% DL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Femto

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE DL SINR, Co-Channel, Femto Tx Power 20dBm



MUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% UL Femto

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CD

F

SINR dB

FUE DL SINR, Co-Channel, Femto Tx Power 20dBm



FUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% DL Femto



8/10/2019 36828-b00

32/110

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

C

DF

SINR, dB

FUE UL SINR, Co-Channel, Femto Tx Power -10 dBm





-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CD

F

SINR, dB

MUE UL SINR, Co-Channel, Femto Tx Power -10 dBm



MUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% DL Femto

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

C

DF

SINR, dB

FUE DL SINR, Co-Channel, Femto Tx Power -10dBm



FUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% DL Femto


-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CD

F

SINR, dB

MUE DL SINR, Co-Channel, Femto Tx Power -10dBm



MUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% UL Femto




5. Se%ario 6

This scenario assumes multiple outdoor Pico cells and multiple Macro cells deployed on the same carrier freEuencywhere all Macro cells have the same 5@85 confiuration and outdoor Pico cells can adjust 5@85 confiuration. The

simulation assumptions are included in /nne /.


The evaluation results usin the deterministic approach are shown in Table :.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

33/110

Ta*le +,:,)!).Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa#

a((ressor! victi$

Pathloss$odel

A((ressorT' power

d4$"

5icti$ cellaccepta*leinterference

d4$")

/ini$u$ 4S separation distance k$"

Sources

) 9 -

Source

3

Source

0

Source

+

Source

2

:utdoorPio

-CMaro

L:S

2 -106.5131.568 131 131.5 131.02 131.03

L:S. .8 0.0 .6 .

Maro

-CoutdoorPio

L:S

6 -8.5518.63 51 518.6 516.5 516.53

L:S12.06 12 12.10 12.06 12.0

5..2 S7ste siu!atio% e9a!uatio%s

The evaluation results by system simulations for scenario ; are shown in 7iures :.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

34/110

-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 400

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1Cochannel macro and pico

UL geometry [dB]

CD

F

PUL: MUL/PUL

MUL: MUL/PUL

PUL: MUL/PR

MUL: MUL/PR

PUL: MDL/PR

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry [dB]

CD

F

Macro and pico in cochannel

MDL: MDL/PDL

PDL: MDL/PDL

PDL: MUL/PR

MDL: MDL/PR

PDL: MDL/PR

#i(ure +,:,-!-. Si$ulation results fro$ Source -

Pico!/acro co!channel without interference $iti(ation sche$e

#i(ure +,:,-!3. Si$ulation results fro$ Source 3




8/10/2019 36828-b00

35/110

#i(ure +,:,-!+. Si$ulation results fro$ Source +


-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry(dB)

CDF







-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL Geometry(dB)

CDF


MUE baseline: all Macro and Pico cells DLPUE baseline: all Macro and Pico cells DL

MUE: all Macro cells DL and Pico cells UL/DL random



Pico!/acro co!channel with interference $iti(ation sche$e

-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL Geometry(dB)

CDF

UL Geometry (co channel)

/UE *aseline. a ll /acro and P ico cells U%

PUE *aseline. a ll /acro and Pico cells U%

/UE. all /acro cells U% and Pico cells threshold AB:+d4Dd4

PUE. all /acro cells U% and Pico cells threshold AB:+d4Dd4/UE. all /acro cells U% and Pico cells threshold AB>Dd4Dd4

PUE. all /acro cells U% and Pico cells threshold AB>Dd4Dd4

/UE. all /acro cells U% and Pico cells threshold AB>+d4Dd4

PUE. all /acro cells U% and Pico cells threshold AB>+d4Dd4

/UE. all /acro cells U% and Pico cells threshold AB?Dd4Dd4

PUE. all /acro cells U% and Pico cells threshold AB?Dd4Dd4

PUE.all /acro cells &% and Pi co cells U%@&% rando$

PUE.all /acro cells &% and Pico cells threshold AB:+d4Dd4

PUE.all /acro cells &% and Pico cells threshold AB>Dd4Dd4

PUE.all /acro cells &% and Pico cells threshold AB>+d4Dd4


8/10/2019 36828-b00

36/110


-70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel

Mul:MUL/PUL

Pul:MUL/PUL

Mul:MUL/PRPul:MUL/PR

Pul:MDL/PR

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF

Co-channel

Mdl:MDL/PDL

Pdl:MDL/PDL

Mdl:MDL/PR

Pdl:MDL/PR

Pdl:MUL/PR


-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 250

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

UL geometry (dB)

CDF


Mul:MUL/PUL

Pul:MUL/PUL

Mul:MUL/PR

Pul:MUL/PR

Pul:MDL/PR

-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL geometry (dB)

CDF


Mdl:MDL/PDL

Pdl:MDL/PDL

Mdl:MDL/PR

Pdl:MDL/PR

Pdl:MUL/PR

#i(ure +,:,-!:. Si$ulation results fro$ Source :


-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE UL SINR, Co-Channel

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% UL Pico

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Pico

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% DL Pico

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

CDF

SINR, dB

MUE DL SINR, Co-Channel

MUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% DL Pico

MUE: 100% DL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Pico

MUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% UL Pico

8/10/2019 36828-b00

37/110

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

C

D

F

SINR, dB

PUE UL SINR, Co-channel

PUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% UL Pico

PUE: 100% UL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Pico

PUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% UL Pico

PUE: 100% DL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Pico

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 600

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

C

D

F

SINR, dB

PUE DL SINR, Co-Channel

PUE: 100% DL Macro, 100% DL Pico

PUE: 100% DL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Pico

PUE: 100% UL Macro, 100% DL Pico



-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

C

D

F

SINR, dB

MUE UL SINR, Co-Channel

MUE: 100% UL Macro, 50% DL+50% UL Pico

MUE: 100% UL Macro, XMP-75



MUE: 100% UL Macro, XMP-75 X

PP-70

MUE: 100% UL Macro, XPP-70

-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

C

D

F

SINR, dB

PUE UL SINR, Co-Channel


PUE: 100% UL Macro, XMP-75



PUE: 100% UL Macro, XMP-75 X

PP-70

PUE: 100% UL Macro, XPP-70

#i(ure +,:,-!>. Si$ulation results fro$ Source >


#i(ure +,:,-!?. Si$ulation results fro$ Source ?

Pico!/acro co!channel with and without interference $iti(ation sche$e

8/10/2019 36828-b00

38/110

#i(ure +,:,-!)D. Si$ulation results fro$ Source )D

5.8 Se%ario

This scenario assumes multiple Macro cells deployed on the same carrier freEuency for one operator and multiple

Macro cells deployed on an adjacent carrier freEuency for another operator where all victim Macro cells deployed onthe same carrier have the same 5@85 confiuration and all aressor Macro cells deployed on an adjacent carrierfreEuency can adjust 5@85 confiuration. The simulation assumptions are included in /nne /.


The evaluation results usin the deterministic approach are shown in Table :.=.-@-.

Ta*le +,>,)!).Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa#

a((ressor !victi$


5icti$ cell accepta*leinterference d4$"

/ini$u$ 4S separation distance

k$"

Sources )9 -

Source-

Source3

Source0

Maro-CMaro 6 -106.5 112.850 113 112.8 112.3

ote? The results are calculated based on the Macro 0$@0$ pathloss modelPLD8.520!o10(R), R i% @


The evaluation results by system simulations for scenario < are shown in 7iures :.=.+@- to :.=.+@

8/10/2019 36828-b00

39/110

/acro!/acro adjacent!channel

-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

SINR [dB]

CDF

Aggressor cells UL, Victim cells UL

Aggressor cells DL, Victim cells DL

-10 -5 0 5 10 15 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

SINR [dB]

CDF

Aggressor cells DL, Victim cells DL

Aggressor cells UL, Victim cells DL

#i(ure +,>,-!). Si$ulation results fro$ Source )


#i(ure +,>,-!-. Si$ulation results fro$ Source -


#i(ure +,>,-!3. Si$ulation results fro$ Source 3

8/10/2019 36828-b00

40/110




-35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 150

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

U% Geo$etr8 d4"

=

U% Geo$etr8 of /acro UE $ultiple operators"

4aseline. a((ressor s8ste$ cells all U%

A((ressor s8ste$ cells all &%

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

DL Geometry (dB)

CDF

DL Geometry of Macro UE (multiple operators)

4aseline. a((ressor s8ste$ cells all &%

A((ressor s8ste$ cells all U%

#i(ure +,>,-!+. Si$ulation results fro$ Source +


-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

UL geometry [dB]

CDF[%]

Macro - macro of multiple operators (Adjacent channel)

Baseline: all UL

Victim UL, Aggressor DL

-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 200

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

DL geometry [dB]

CDF[%]

Macro - macro of multiple operators (Adjacent channel)

Baseline: all DL

Victim DL, Aggressor UL



8/10/2019 36828-b00

41/110

-10 0 10 20 300

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CD

F

SINR, dB

MUE DL SINR, Adjacent Channel

MUE: One network DL, One network UL

MUE: Baseline - two networks in DL

-30 -20 -10 0 10 200

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

CD

F

SINR, dB

MUE UL SINR, Adjacent Channel

MUE: One network UL, One network DL

MUE: Baseline - two networks in UL

#i(ure +,>,-!:. Si$ulation results fro$ Source :

5. Se%ario 8

This scenario assumes multiple Macro cells deployed on the same carrier freEuency for one operator. The simulationassumptions are included in /nne /. This scenario is studied mainly based on deterministic approach.


The evaluation results usin the deterministic approach are shown in Table :.>.-@-.

Ta*le +,?,)!).Resu!ts o deteri%isti a""roa#

a((ressor !victi$


5icti$ cell accepta*leinterference d4$"

/ini$u$ 4S separation distance

k$"

Source)7-707+ Source 3 Source )

Maro-CMaro 6 -106.5 150 1 16000 1 3.82

ote -H The results are calculated based on the Macro 0$@0$ pathloss model PLD8.520!o10(R), R i% @

ote +H The results are calculated based on the Macro 0$@0$ pathloss model

>++

+=

#mRR

#mRR$%

;.-,)(lo9,);.-,(lo+,9:.>=

;.-,)(lo+,9:.>=

-,-,

-,

5. 10 Suar7

0ased on the co@eistence evaluations for the eiht scenarios followin conclusions are made?

$inificant 0$@0$ co@eistence challenes have been observed to apply different T88 5@85 confiurations

in different cells for scenarios -@9 without any interference mitiation mechanisms.

't is feasible to apply different T88 5@85 confiurations in different cells for scenarios - A 9 only provided

sufficient interference mitiation mechanisms are adopted. The interference mitiation schemes need furtherstudy.

$inificant 0$@0$ coeistence challenes have been observed when different T88 5@85 confiurations are

applied in different cells for scenarios :@= without any interference mitiation schemes. Preliminary results

8/10/2019 36828-b00

42/110

with interference mitiation mechanisms were submitted but it has not been discussed. o conclusion oncoeistence feasibility with interference mitiation mechanisms has been made.

6 Perora%e e9a!uatio%

6.1 Met#odo!oies

To evaluate the benefits of T88 5@85 reconfiuration based on traffic adaptation at least in terms of performance andenery savin the followin metrics can be used?

Pac#et throuhput defined as the pac#et si!e over the pac#et transmission time includin the pac#et waitin

time in the buffer

2 averae pac#et throuhput defined as the averae of pac#et throuhput for the 2

:F :,F >:FN 2 averae pac#et throuhput from the 187 of averae pac#et throuhput from all 2s

1ell averae pac#et throuhput defined as the mean of averae pac#et throuhput from all 2s

Other metrics e..

o Pac#et drop statistics

o Pac#et delay statistics

o 7reEuency resource (P"0s) utili!ations

o Time resource (subframes) utili!ations

o 187 of pac#et throuhput

o Total number of confiured 85B5 subframes

The ain of T88 5@85 reconfiuration is assessed by comparin its performance relative to a fied reference T885@85 confiuration where the ain is evaluated over different fied reference T88 5@85 confiurations and

different downlin#Buplin# traffic loads. 8ownlin# and uplin# transmissions are evaluated in an interated simulatorwith metrics collected separately for downlin# and uplin#. 8ifferent time scales for T88 5@85 reconfiuration arealso evaluated to show its impact on the performance.

6.2 Se%ario 1+ 4so!ated "io e!!

This section captures the simulation assumptions and evaluation results for the isolated pico cell scenario. Theevaluation assumptions are shown in Table ;.+@-.

Ta*le 2,-!). Evaluation assu$ptions for isolated pico cell scenario

Parameters /ssumptions

Pico deployment sinle cell with a radius of 9, m

Pico antenna ain : d0i

Pico antenna pattern +8 Omni@directional

Pico noise fiure -3 d0

8/10/2019 36828-b00

43/110

2 antenna ain , d0i

2 noise fiure > d0

2 power class +3 d0m (+,, m)

Minimum distance between 2 andpico

-, m

umber of 2s per pico cell -,

$hadowin standard deviation 3d0 for 5O$ and 9d0 for 5O$

Pathloss P55O$(")-,3.=Q+,.>lo-,(")

P55O$(")-9:.9Q3

8/10/2019 36828-b00

44/110

5in# adaptation M1$ selection with -,F 052" assumin ideal 1$'

'f the hihest M1$ is selected the 052" may be less than -,F which

shall be modeled

$et of T88 5@85 confiurations The seven T88 5@85 confiurations defined in "el@= can be used

for reconfiurations

$mall scale fadin ot modeled

1arrier freEuency + GR!

1yclic prefi lenth ormal 1P in both downlin# and uplin#

$pecial subframe confiuration 1onfiuration L=

Pac#et drop time The pac#et drop time is either not modeled or modeled accordin to3;.=-9 (i.e. =s for ,.:M0 and 3+s for +M0)

8ownlin#Buplin# receiver type MM$2 for both downlin# and uplin#

5 modulation order UP$& -;U/M ;9U/MN

Tables ;.+@+ to ;.+@; show the evaluation results of isolated pico cell scenario for different fied reference T88 5@85

confiurations and different downlin#Buplin# traffic loads. The values are relative ain or loss of T88 5@85reconfiuration based on traffic adaptation compared to the fied reference T88 5@85 confiuration.

Ta*le 2,-!-. #i'ed reference T&& U%!&% confi(uration D< ratio of &%@U% arrival rates of ).-

85 arrival

rateMetric Time scale

"elative ain umber of

sourcesMean Ma Min

,.+:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms --:.9=F -3;.93F >9.:9F +

+,,ms ;:.-3F ;:.-3F ;:.-3F -

;9,ms 9+.:3F :,.9+F 39.;9F +

averae 5 PTP

-,ms @+.9-F @-.9-F @3.9-F +

+,,ms @3-.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

45/110

averae 5 PTP

-,ms @+.3+F @,.:,F @3.;-F ;

+,,ms @

8/10/2019 36828-b00

46/110

;9,ms @+=.-,F @+.,,F +

:F 85 PTP

-,ms =3.:

8/10/2019 36828-b00

47/110

:F 85 PTP

-,ms @,.-,F @,.-,F @,.-,F +

+,,ms ,.-,F ,.-,F ,.-,F -

;9,ms ,.,:F ,.-,F ,.,,F +

:F 5 PTP

-,ms ,.,,F ,.,,F ,.,,F +

+,,ms ,.,,F ,.,,F ,.,,F -

;9,ms @,.,-F ,.,,F @,.,-F -

Ta*le 2,-!3. #i'ed reference T&& U%!&% confi(uration )< ratio of &%@U% arrival rates of ).)

85 arrival



sourcesMean Ma Min

,.+:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms :,.,+F :.:3F 3

+,,ms 3,.=3F +

;9,ms >.;>F -;.-,F 9.+F +;.,,F =

+,,ms +:.3-F 93.,F @-,.3,F =

averae 5 PTP

-,ms 9-.,+F -9.>+F =

+,,ms -;.:>F +.,,F -3.+:F @+=.;,F =

:F 5 PTP -,ms ;+.,;F =3.;,F 9:.-,F =

+,,ms 9,.-+F

8/10/2019 36828-b00

48/110

;9,ms +.+.,,F 3

+,,ms 3=.=,F 3=.=,F 3=.=,F -

;9,ms >..=,F -

;9,ms @,.93F -:.9,F @+-.9,F 3

:F 5 PTP

-,ms 9;.+3F :,.-,F 3>.=+F 3

+,,ms -9.;,F -9.;,F -9.;,F -

;9,ms @>.F -:.>+F @3:.-,F 3

-.:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms 9;F ::.-,F 9,.=+F +

+,,ms 3+.;,F 3+.;,F 3+.;,F -

;9,ms >.,,F --.9,F ;.;,F +

averae 5 PTP

-,ms 9

8/10/2019 36828-b00

49/110

;9,ms ,.=-F +,.:,F 9

:F 5 PTP

-,ms ;+.,:F =3.9>F 3>.9F @9.F

8/10/2019 36828-b00

50/110

;9,ms @3.F +

+,,ms -.;,F -.;,F -.;,F -

;9,ms ,.--F @,.,+F @-.=,F +

+,,ms @+.+,F @+.+,F @+.+,F -

;9,ms @,.>;F @,.,-F @-.>,F +

Ta*le 2,-!0. #i'ed reference T&& U%!&% confi(uration )< ratio of &%@U% arrival rates of -.)

85 arrival



sourcesMean Ma Min

,.+:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms :.,,F >.,,F -

;9,ms ,.3-F >.,3F @=.9,F +

:F 85 PTP

-,ms ;3.-,F >3.:,F 3+.;>F +

+,,ms ::.;,F ::.;,F ::.;,F -

;9,ms @3.;+F 3.+,F @-,.9:F +

:F 5 PTP

-,ms +>.3:F 9=.9,F -,.3-F +

+,,ms -+.,,F -+.,,F -+.,,F -

;9,ms @3,.-=F @+-..3,F 9>.3,F :

+,,ms 39.:>F :9.>,F -+.=,F 9

;9,ms -+.+-F 3:.-,F @-,.3,F :

averae 5 PTP

-,ms 93.93F 9,F 3.3,F 9

;9,ms 9.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

51/110

+,,ms -=.-3F 9-.>:F :.-,F 9

;9,ms @-9.:;F 39.,:F @9:.9,F :

-

averae 85 PTP

-,ms ;,..9,F >.9,F -

;9,ms @+=.+:F @-=..,F 9

+,,ms :,.;:F .;-F -:.=+F 3.9,F +

;9,ms @3.,+F 3.>,F @-,.3,F 9

:F 85 PTP -,ms .:,F -3+.9=F 9;.9,F 9

8/10/2019 36828-b00

52/110

+,,ms 3>.9:F :+.+,F +;.F -;.>3F ;..+,F -:.+,F 3.+,F +

;9,ms @++.;:F @=.-,F @3;.9,F 9

+.:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms ;=.9,F -,.-+F 33.->F 3+.+;F =.3,F 9

+,,ms -F @+;..=:F 3

averae 5 PTP

-,ms ,.>:F +.;,F @,.=3F 3

+,,ms @9.;,F @3.>,F @:.3,F +

;9,ms @->.::F @-=.9,F @+-..>,F +>.>,F -

;9,ms -9.:-F ->.;,F >.9-F +

averae 5 PTP -,ms @:>.>>F @9:.>=F @

8/10/2019 36828-b00

53/110

+,,ms @

8/10/2019 36828-b00

54/110

;9,ms @33.>+F @-;.>,F @99.-,F ;

:F 5 PTP

-,ms ++>.3;.-,F ;

+,,ms -::.=9F ->3.++F -+>.-,F 9

;9,ms >+.,3F -3F >.;;F =.+,F +

+,,ms +.,,F +.,,F +.,,F -

;9,ms @-+.3-F @>.-+F @-:.:,F +

averae 5 PTP

-,ms +->.>.99F +

+,,ms -:=.,,F -:=.,,F -:=.,,F -

;9,ms --9.9-F -++.+,F -,;.;+F +

:F 85 PTP

-,ms 3.=;F 9.=,F +.>+F +

+,,ms @-=.9,F @-=.9,F @-=.9,F -

;9,ms @3:.-+F @+:.,9F @9:.+,F +

:F 5 PTP

-,ms +=3.,.,,F ->>.,,F ->>.,,F -

;9,ms >;.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

55/110

:F 85 PTP

-,ms +.+=F >.+,F @3.:=F 9

+,,ms @--.>.,,F +

;9,ms -3-.,=F -=3F @,.:F +:3.93F 9

+,,ms +9>.+9F +;=.9-F ++=.+,F 3

;9,ms -=9.>>F +,=.:,F -::.-3F 9

:F 85 PTP

-,ms @+.=:F @-.-:F @:.+,F 9

+,,ms @-;.:,F @-,.+3F @->.>,F 3

;9,ms @39.-:F @+=.::F @9;.+,F 9

:F 5 PTP

-,ms 33.;3F 9

+,,ms 39,.:-F 9--.3,F +F 3

;9,ms +3=.++F +

8/10/2019 36828-b00

56/110

averae 5 PTP

-,ms :

8/10/2019 36828-b00

57/110

+,,ms @,.99F -+.-,F @+-.-:F 9

;9,ms @++..9;F ;

:F 5 PTP

-,ms +,9.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

58/110

;9,ms ;9.,:F =3.,,F +,.,,F 9

:F 85 PTP

-,ms =.=:F -;.>,F @+.+;F 9

+,,ms +.9,F 3.+,F -.;,F +

;9,ms @-:.=3F @+.,,F @3:.9,F 9

:F 5 PTP

-,ms ->.9,F -9>.:=F 9

+,,ms -33.+:F -3;.,,F -3,.:,F +

;9,ms ;,.--F

8/10/2019 36828-b00

59/110

;9,ms @3.,+F @+.,,F @9.,9F +

averae 5 PTP

-,ms @=.,:F -.,,F ;.,,F @99.,,F +

:F 85 PTP

-,ms -,.33F -9.;:F ;.,,F +

+,,ms :.3,F :.3,F :.3,F -

;9,ms F :.>+F @-=.-,F +

+,,ms @->.-,F @->.-,F @->.-,F -

;9,ms @=.-;F ;.->F @++.:,F +

6.3 Se%ario 2+ Mu!ti-e!! "io se%ario

This section captures the simulation assumptions and evaluation results for the multi@cell pico scenario. The evaluationassumptions are shown in Table ;.3@-.

Ta*le 2,3!). Evaluation assu$ptions for $ulti!cell pico scenario

Parameters /ssumptions

$cenario 1o@channel and multiple pico cells

$ystem bandwidth -, MR!


'nter@site distance :,, m

Macro deployment The typical ->@cell and 3@sectored heaon system layout

ote that macro cells are deployed but not activated

Pico deployment 9,m radius random deployment

umber of pico cells per sector 9

Minimum distance between pico cells 9, m

Minimum distance between 2 and

pico

-, m

Pico antenna pattern +8 Omni@directional

Pico antenna ain : d0i

8/10/2019 36828-b00

60/110

2 antenna ain , d0i

Pico noise fiure -3 d0

2 noise fiure > d0

Maimum pico TS power +9 d0m


umber of 2s per pico cell -, 2s uniformly dropped around each of the Pico cells within aradius of 9,m

$hadowin standard deviationbetween outdoor Pico cells

; d0

$hadowin correlation between 2s ,

$hadowin correlation between picos ,.:

Pico@to@pico pathloss 5O$? if "J+B3 #m P5(")>=.9Q+,lo-,(") free space lossHelse P5(")-,-.>Q9,lo-,(") " in #m 8ual slop model T"+:>9+

section:.-.9.3H

5O$? P5 9,lo-,(")Q-;>.3; " in #m +:.>9+?section lo-,(")

P55O$(")-9:.9Q3=.9:Q+,Vlo-,(") " in #m

'f "K:,m P5::.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

61/110

,.: ,.;+: -.+: -.=

8/10/2019 36828-b00

62/110

averae 5 PTP-,ms 99.+:F 99.+:F 99.+:F -

;9,ms 93.=-F 93.=-F 93.=-F -

:F 85 PTP-,ms 3>.=.=.=.:9F +>.:9F +>.:9F -

;9,ms 9.=+F 9.=+F 9.=+F -

,.:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms 9-.9-F :3.,3F -.:,F +

;9,ms @9.>=F 9.>,F @-+.:,F :

averae 5 PTP

-,ms 9;.-:F ;:.==F +;.,,F ;

+,,ms 39.;:F 99.:,F +9.=,F +

;9,ms +9..>F :

:F 85 PTP

-,ms 99.>:F ;;.,,F ++.:=F ;

+,,ms +F +=.-

8/10/2019 36828-b00

63/110

;9,ms +3.-=F ::.=,F @>.99F +

:F 5 PTP

-,ms :9.,

8/10/2019 36828-b00

64/110

:F 5 PTP

-,ms @3.=;F @3.=;F @3.=;F -

+,,ms @3.;:F @3.;:F @3.;:F -

;9,ms @9.9-F @9.9-F @9.9-F -

Ta*le 2,3,)!-. #i'ed reference T&& U%!&% confi(uration )< ratio of &%@U% arrival rates of -.)

85 arrival



sourcesMean Ma Min

,.+:

averae 85 PTP-,ms 9+.;:F :9.;-F 3,.F @-+.9>F @-+.9>F -

,.:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms 99.>.-3F .-3F 3

;9,ms -,.9+F 3>.,,F @-9.+=F :

:F 85 PTP

-,ms 9=.9-F F @-:.;9F :

:F 5 PTP

-,ms 3,.99F

8/10/2019 36828-b00

65/110

;9,ms @-.:

8/10/2019 36828-b00

66/110

averae 5 PTP

-,ms @-,.++F @;.9,F @-9.,3F +

+,,ms @-:.3=F @>.;,F @+-.-:F +

;9,ms @+.:-F -

:F 5 PTP

-,ms @;-.9+F @;-.9+F @;-.9+F -

+,,ms @;-.9=F @;-.9=F @;-.9=F -

;9,ms @;,.>+F @;,.>+F @;,.>+F -

Ta*le 2,3,)!3. #i'ed reference T&& U%!&% confi(uration -< ratio of &%@U% arrival rates of -.)

85 arrival



sourcesMean Ma Min

,.+:averae 85 PTP

-,ms -+.=,F -+.=,F -+.=,F -

;9,ms @33.=+F -

;9,ms ->+.,;F ->+.,;F ->+.,;F -

:F 85 PTP-,ms 9.>:F 9.>:F 9.>:F -

;9,ms @9;.,:F @9;.,:F @9;.,:F -

:F 5 PTP -,ms -F -F -F -

;9,ms -->.--F -->.--F -->.--F -

8/10/2019 36828-b00

67/110

,.:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms >.,3F -9.,:F 3.,,F ;

+,,ms @-,...+3F -:>.F -9:.,>F 9

+,,ms --

8/10/2019 36828-b00

68/110

+

averae 85 PTP

-,ms @9.9=F 3.,>F @-=.,3F 9

+,,ms @->.39F +

;9,ms @+;.>.::F +

8/10/2019 36828-b00

69/110

:F 5 PTP-,ms -+

8/10/2019 36828-b00

70/110

;9,ms +,.39F 33.3,F F +

+.:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms -9.-9F -9.:,F -3..=,F ->.,,F +

+,,ms >;.,-F >;.,-F >;.,-F -

;9,ms 3;.:-F ;:.>+F

8/10/2019 36828-b00

71/110

rate sources

,.+:

averae 85 PTP-,ms 9.+=F -

averae 5 PTP

-,ms 9;.9;F 9;.9;F 9;.9;F -

;9,ms 3=.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

72/110

;9,ms @+;.==F @-=.9F +

averae 5 PTP-,ms =>.+,F --,.-9F ;=.+:F +

;9,ms ;.;:F :,.+;F +

:F 85 PTP-,ms @3+.>-F @-=.>.+=F +

;9,ms 9F >9.>9F 9=.>:F +

+.:

averae 85 PTP-,ms @-.>:F @-.>:F @-.>:F -

;9,ms @-9.33F @-9.33F @-9.33F -

averae 5 PTP

-,ms :9.=>F :9.=>F :9.=>F -

;9,ms 9+.,+F 9+.,+F 9+.,+F -

:F 85 PTP-,ms ,.,,F ,.,,F ,.,,F -

;9,ms ,.,,F ,.,,F ,.,,F -

:F 5 PTP-,ms ,.,,F ,.,,F ,.,,F -

;9,ms ,.,,F ,.,,F ,.,,F -

Ta*le 2,3,-!-. #i'ed reference T&& U%!&% confi(uration )< ratio of &%@U% arrival rates of -.)

85 arrival



sourcesMean Ma Min

,.+:

averae 85 PTP-,ms :+.,9F :+.,9F :+.,9F -

;9,ms @3F -

;9,ms 3;.;9F 3;.;9F 3;.;9F -

:F 85 PTP

-,ms 3=.:3F 3=.:3F 3=.:3F -

;9,ms @+,.99F @+,.99F @+,.99F -

:F 5 PTP-,ms 3-.:+F 3-.:+F 3-.:+F -

;9,ms @+=.-:F @+=.-:F @+=.-:F -

,.:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms 9-.:>F 99.+9F 3=.3;F 3

+,,ms +-.--F +-.--F +-.--F -

;9,ms ;.>=F F -.==F @;.=;F +

8/10/2019 36828-b00

73/110

:F 85 PTP

-,ms 3:..->F 3

+,,ms :.;F -

;9,ms @-;.F -

;9,ms @-.3+F -;.;F +9.,>F -

;9,ms @:.3>F @,.>-F @-+.F @>.>F +:.>>F -

averae 5 PTP-,ms @+.,;F -3.9F -

;9,ms @-;.3

8/10/2019 36828-b00

74/110

+,,ms 3;.,,F 3;.,,F 3;.,,F -

;9,ms 3,.-9F ;3.3-F +.3

8/10/2019 36828-b00

75/110

-

averae 85 PTP

-,ms 3.;-F 9.,=F +.;>F 3

+,,ms @-;.->F @-;.->F @-;.->F -

;9,ms @++.::F @+,.;;F @+:.,

8/10/2019 36828-b00

76/110

Ta*le 2,3,-!0. #i'ed reference T&& U%!&% confi(uration -< ratio of &%@U% arrival rates of 0.)

85 arrival



sourcesMean Ma Min

,.+:

averae 85 PTP

-,ms @3+.+

8/10/2019 36828-b00

77/110

$cenario Multi@cell macro@pico scenario

$ystem bandwidth -, MR!


'nter@site distance :,, m

Macro deployment The typical ->@cell and 3@sectored heaon system layout

Pico deployment 9,m radius random deployment

umber of pico cells per sector 9

Minimum distance between pico cells 9, m

Minimum distance between outdoorpico and macro

d0

Maimum macro T power 9;d0m

Maimum pico TS power +9 d0m

Macro 85 power control ot modeled i.e. assumin ma macro T power


8/10/2019 36828-b00

78/110

umber of 2s per macro cell on@uniform ;,2Bmacro cell (i.e. +, Macro 2s randomly anduniformly dropped per Macro cell)

umber of 2s per pico cell -, 2s uniformly dropped around each of the Pico cells within aradius of 9,m

ser distribution 1luster Photspot+B3

$hadowin standard deviationbetween outdoor Pico cells

; d0

$hadowin standard deviationbetween outdoor Pico and Macro

; d0

$hadowin correlation between 2s ,

$hadowin correlation between picos ,.:

$hadowin correlation betweenoutdoor pico and macro

,.:

$hadowin correlation between macrocells

/ shadowin correlation factor of ,.: for the shadowin between sites(reardless aressin or victim system) and of - between sectors ofthe same site shall be used

Outdoor Pico to outdoor Pico pathloss 5O$? if "J+B3 #m P5(")>=.9Q+,lo-,(") free space lossH

else P5(")-,-.>Q9,lo-,(") " in #m 8ual slop model T"+:>9+section:.-.9.3H

5O$? P5 9,lo-,(")Q-;>.3; " in #m +:.>9+?section lo-,(") P55O$(")-9:.9Q3=.9:Q+,Vlo-,(") " in #m

'f "K:,m P5::.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

79/110

7or +GR! " in #m.

1ase -? Prob(")min(,.,-=B"-)V(-@ep(@"B,.,;3))Qep(@"B,.,;3)3;.=-9? table /+.-.-.:@+ H

Macro to outdoor Pico P55O$(") -,,.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

80/110

ot modeled

1P lenth ormal 1P in both downlin# and uplin#.

$pecial subframe confiuration $pecial subframe confiuration L=

Pac#et drop time The pac#et drop time is either not modeled or model accordin to3;.=-9 (i.e. =s for ,.:M0 and 3+s for +M0).

"eceiver type MM$2 receiver

5 modulation order UP$& -;U/M ;9U/MN

Traffic model 7TP model - in T"3;.=-9

Poisson distributed with arrival rate

umber of 2s accordin to the simulated scenario

/ pac#et is randomly assined to a 2 with eEual probability

'ndependent traffic modelin for 85 and 5 per 2

7ied si!e of ,.:Mbytes and +Mbytes as in T"3;.=-9

Possible rane of file arrivin rate () shall cover both low and

hih load cases. Proposed value rane of for 85 is ,.+: ,.: --.: + +.: :

8/10/2019 36828-b00

81/110

6..1 *9a!uatio% resu!ts it#out i%terere%e itiatio%

Tables ;.9.-@- to ;.9.-@9 show the evaluation results of co@channel multi@cell macro@pico scenario for different fiedreference T88 5@85 confiurations and different downlin#Buplin# traffic loads without interference mitiation. The

values are relative ain or loss of T88 5@85 reconfiuration based on traffic adaptation compared to the fiedreference T88 5@85 confiuration.

Table ;.9.-@-a collects the metrics separately for pico and macro and Table ;.9.-@-b collects the metrics jointly for picoand macro.

Ta*le 2,0,)!)a. #i'ed reference T&& U%!&% confi(uration )< ratio of &%@U% arrival rates of -.)

85 arrival


"elative ainum of

sourcesMean Ma Mean

Pico Macro Pico Macro Pico Macro

,.+:

/verae

85 PTP-,ms 3:.

8/10/2019 36828-b00

82/110

;9,ms 99.;+F -.=;F =,.,;F 3.9:F >.-=F ,.+

8/10/2019 36828-b00

83/110

;9,ms

36828-b00

Documents

Transcript of 36828-b00