3.3 Managing stress

24
Psychology 3.3 Managing stress

description

3.3 Managing stress. Learning outcomes. Understand the following three studies on managing stress: Cognitive (Meichenbaum, D. (1972) ‘Cognitive modification of test anxious college students’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 39, 370–80); - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of 3.3 Managing stress

Page 1: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

3.3 Managing stress

Page 2: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Learning outcomes

Understand the following three studies on managing stress:• Cognitive (Meichenbaum, D. (1972) ‘Cognitive

modification of test anxious college students’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 39, 370–80);

• Behavioural (Budzynski et al. (1970) ‘Feedback induced muscle relaxation applied to tension headache’, Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychology 1, 205–11);

• Social (Waxler-Morrison et al. (1993) ‘Effects of social relationship on survival or women with breast cancer’, Social Science and Medicine 33 (2), 177–83).

Page 3: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Cognitive methodKey theory: Meichenbaum (1972), Stress inoculation therapy (SIT)

Meichenbaum suggests that there are three components of SIT:

• The patients with the stress have to become aware of the thoughts they have in any stressful situations.

Page 4: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Key theory: Meichenbaum (1972), Stress inoculation therapy (SIT) (cont.)

• The second component is the coping strategies that patients are taught to enable them to restructure their thoughts.

• Finally the person puts into practice what they have learned in a real-life stressful situation.

Page 5: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Key study: Meichenbaum (1972)

Aim• To compare SIT with standard behavioural

systematic desensitisation and a control group on a waiting list.

Method• A field experiment where students were

assessed before and after treatment using self-report and grade averages.

Page 6: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Participants

• 21 students aged from 17 to 25 who responded to an advert for treatment of test anxiety.

Design• Matched pairs design with random allocation

to either the SIT therapy group, the waiting list control group or the standard systematic desensitisation group.

• Matched groups on gender and anxiety levels.

Page 7: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Procedure

• Each participant was tested using a test anxiety questionnaire and allocated to their group.

• In the SIT group the participants received eight therapy sessions. They were given the ‘insight’ approach to help them identify their thoughts prior to the tests. They were then given some positive statements to say and relaxation techniques to use in test situations.

Page 8: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Procedure (cont.)

• In the systematic desensitisation group the participants were given eight therapy sessions with progressive relaxation training, which they were encouraged to practise at home.

• The control group were told they were on a waiting list and that they would receive therapy in the future.

Page 9: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Findings

• Performance on the tests improved in the SIT group compared with the other two groups.

• The significant difference was between the two therapy groups and the control group.

• Participants in the SIT group showed more reported improvement in their anxiety levels, although both therapy groups showed overall improvement compared to the control group.

Page 10: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Conclusions

• SIT is a more effective way of reducing anxiety in students who are anxiety prone in test situations. It is more effective than behavioural techniques such as systematic desensitisation as it adds a cognitive component to the therapy.

Page 11: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Behavioural method Key study: Budzynski et al. (1970)

Aim• To see whether biofeedback is an effective

method of reducing tension headaches.

Method• Experimental method, with patients being

trained in a laboratory.

Page 12: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Participants

• 18 participants who replied to an advertisement in a local paper in Colorado.

Design • Independent design. The participants were

randomly allocated to one of three groups.

Page 13: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Procedure

• For two weeks patients kept a record of their headaches.

• Groups A and B were given 16 sessions of training, with 2 sessions each week for 8 weeks.• Group A were taught relaxation and told

the ‘clicks’ of the biofeedback machine would reflect their muscle tension, with slower clicks indicating less muscle tension.

Page 14: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Procedure (cont.)

• Group B were told to concentrate on the varying clicks. They were given pseudo-feedback.

• Group C were given no training but were told they would begin training in two months.

Page 15: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Findings

• The muscle tension of Group A was significantly different from Group B by the end of the training, and after three months, Group A’s tension was significantly lower than Group B’s.

• Group A’s reported headaches dropped significantly from their baseline, whereas the other didn’t, and was also significantly less than Group B’s and Group C’s reported headaches.

Page 16: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Findings (cont.)

• Drug usage in Group A decreased, more than in Group B.

• Group A reported less headache activity than Group B.

• There was a follow up for Group A after 18 months, when four out of the six participants were contacted. Three reported very low headache activity, and the fourth reported some reduction.

Page 17: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Conclusions

• Biofeedback is an effective way at training patients to relax and reduce their tension headaches, so can be seen as an effective method of stress management.

• Relaxation training is also more effective than just being monitored, but is better when used together with biofeedback.

Page 18: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Social support Key study: Waxler-Morrison et al. (1993)

Aim • To see how social relationships influence

response to breast cancer and survival.

Method • A quasi-experiment with women who were

diagnosed with breast cancer.

Page 19: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Participants

• 133 women under 55 years (pre-menopausal).

Design • Independent design as women had

existing social networks.

Page 20: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Procedure

• Patients were mailed a self-administered questionnaire to gather information on: their demography and existing social networks, their educational level, who they were responsible for (e.g. children), contact with friends and family, perception of support from others.

• They were given a psychometric test of social network that combined marital status, contact with friends and family and church membership.

Page 21: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Procedure (cont.)

• The details of their diagnosis was abstracted from their medical records between June 1980 and May 1981, and then their survival and recurrence rates were checked in their medical records in January 1985.

Page 22: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Findings

• Six aspects of social network were significantly linked with survival. These were: marital status, support from friends, contact with friends, total support, social network and employment.

• The qualitative data from the interviews showed that practical help such as childcare, cooking and transport to hospital were the concrete aspects of support.

Page 23: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Findings (cont.)

• Married women who survived tended to report supportive spouses.

• Jobs were seen as important, even if they were not financially important, as they were a source of support and information.

Page 24: 3.3 Managing stress

Psychology

Conclusions

• The more social networks and support, the higher the survival rate of women with breast cancer, although type of cancer was still the main factor in survival.