328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham...

39
FINAL REPORT Asbestos-Containing Building Material Assessment Toronto Catholic District School Board St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario PROJECT NO. 1025760

Transcript of 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham...

Page 1: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

FINAL REPORT Asbestos-Containing Building Material Assessment Toronto Catholic District School Board

St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario

PROJECT NO. 1025760

Page 2: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board

80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario M2N 6E8

FOR Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment – Final Report

ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario

May 2, 2008

Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue

Markham, Ontario L3R 5X5

Phone: 905-474-7700

Fax: 905-479-9326

www.jacqueswhitford.com

Page 3: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of St. Augustine Catholic School, located at 98 Shoreham Drive in Toronto, Ontario.

The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.

The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this information for construction or renovation.

The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.

Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present at the subject facility. Table 1 below provides a summary of the materials identified and recommendations on their management.

Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations

Issue Comments Recommendation

Asbestos Friable asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present in the form of insulating cement of pipe fittings. The material was observed to be in good condition.

Non-friable asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present in the form of 12”x12” vinyl floor tile. These materials were observed to be in good condition.

Presumed asbestos-containing materials (PACMs) were identified to be present in the form of cement pipe, caulking materials, roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity.

Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content. Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05. Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

The statements made in this Executive Summary text are subject to the same limitations included in the Closure Section 8.0, and are to be read in conjunction with the remainder of this report.

Page 4: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 ii

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ i 

Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment ......................................................... 1 

1.0  INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1  Assessment Objectives .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2  Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................ 1 

2.0  ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 2 

3.0  ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................. 2 

4.0  REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................. 3 

5.0  ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................................ 4 5.1  Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ...................................................................................... 4 5.2  Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ............................................................................... 4 5.3  Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................. 5 5.4  Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials ........................................................................................... 5 

6.0  RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 5 

7.0  CLOSURE .................................................................................................................................. 6 

List of Tables

Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations ..................................................................... i

List of Appendices

APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials ....................... 1 APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos Content .............. 2 APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................ 3 APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos: Polarized Light Microscopy ................. 4 APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos-Containing Materials ......................... 5 APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions ............................................................................................ 6

Page 5: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 1

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

1.0 INTRODUCTION Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of St. Augustine Catholic School, located at 98 Shoreham Drive in Toronto, Ontario.

The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.

The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this information for construction or renovation.

The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.

1.1 Assessment Objectives

The objective of the assessment was to:

prepare an assessment report that identifies asbestos-containing materials present at the subject facility; and,

provide recommendations for the management of these materials.

1.2 Scope of Work

The scope of work for this assessment involved the following:

a “room-by-room” visual assessment of readily accessible room spaces of the subject facility for the presence of asbestos-containing building materials;

an inventory of building materials/components that are suspected to contain asbestos;

the collection of representative bulk samples from building materials suspected of containing asbestos fibres;

laboratory analysis for the determination of the type and concentration of asbestos present in the samples submitted; and,

preparation of a report documenting the results of the assessment, providing an interpretation of the laboratory analysis results and recommendations for the management of any asbestos containing materials.

Page 6: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 2

2.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY A room-by-room visual assessment of the subject facility was made in order to check for the presence of materials suspected of containing asbestos.

During the assessment, locations to collect discrete bulk asbestos samples of suspect building materials were identified. Samples of representative materials were then collected at these locations in accordance with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

An assessment of the condition, accessibility and exposure risk was completed for each occurrence of an asbestos-containing material. The Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised June 16th, 1999) was used as the basis for the criteria that was applied in evaluating the presence of asbestos-containing materials at the subject areas, where applicable.

Samples of suspect ACMs from various building materials were collected and submitted to EMSL Laboratories Inc. (EMSL) located in Westmont, New Jersey, for analysis using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining. The analysis was conducted following the U.S. EPA/600/R-93/116 Methods. EMSL is certified under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) to perform asbestos analysis of bulk samples.

The number of bulk samples was based on the requirements of the new asbestos regulation that specifies the minimum number of samples of a particular building material that should be collected and tested to consider a material non-asbestos-containing. A positive stop option was used during the laboratory analysis of the building materials suspected to contain asbestos. Multiple samples of visually similar material were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis.

The positive stop option involves testing a series of samples from a particular building material until test results indicate the presence of asbestos. When this occurs, the remaining samples are not tested. This is a cost effective method of limiting the number of samples that are ultimately tested.

Additionally, materials that had been previously sampled and identified to contain asbestos were referenced from available reports and not re-tested.

A summary list of the bulk samples collected by Jacques Whitford, including a description of the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2.

3.0 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS This report reflects the observations made within the subject facility only, and the results of analyses performed on specific materials sampled during the assessment. Analytical results reflect the sampled materials at the specific sampling locations.

Due to access restrictions imposed by working in occupied and operational spaces, the asbestos content of some building materials could not be determined at some locations. Where applicable, building materials that were not sampled but that may contain asbestos include, but are not limited to the following:

Page 7: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 3

sub-grade materials;

curtains;

flooring material concealed beneath carpeting, ceramic tile, brickwork, hardwood flooring and/or concealed beneath existing sub-floors;

drywall and/or wall plaster materials concealed behind new and/or additional walls;

woven tape inside duct connection joints;

inner ducting insulation;

refractory brick;

insulation material present inside walls (i.e. suspected asbestos-containing vermiculite insulation inside concrete block and/or brick walls);

pipe straight-run and pipe elbow insulation within wall cavities, inaccessible ceiling spaces or crawlspaces;

insulation materials inside fire doors;

the mechanical inner linings of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and,

heat protection materials inside mechanical installations and light fixtures.

If encountered during renovation or other activities, any suspected ACMs not identified within this report should be presumed to contain asbestos and handled as such until otherwise shown to be non asbestos-containing through analytical testing.

4.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Asbestos is included in the Designated Substances Regulations made under Ontario's OHSA. The Designated Substance Regulation respecting Asbestos (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 837, amended to O. Reg. 279/05) primarily regulates worker exposure to asbestos during manufacturing of asbestos containing products, but also includes requirements related to respiratory equipment, measurement of airborne fibres, and medical surveillance of exposed workers.

The Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the OHSA for Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations, clearly defines asbestos-containing material as a material that contains 0.5 per cent or more asbestos by dry weight. The new asbestos regulation (O. Reg. 278/05) became effective as of November 1, 2005.

The General Waste Management Regulation (O. Reg. 347/90), under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) of Ontario, sets out the requirements for the proper disposal of asbestos waste in Ontario. The waste must be placed in a double sealed container, properly labeled, free of cuts, tears or punctures and disposed of at a licensed waste station which has been properly notified of the presence of asbestos waste.

Page 8: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 4

5.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The result of the assessment for asbestos-containing building materials is discussed below. The evaluation criterion for assessing asbestos-containing materials is provided in Appendix 5. A list of definitions for technical terms used in this report is provided in Appendix 6.

Asbestos-containing materials are grouped into two classifications, friable and non-friable materials. Friable ACMs are those that can easily be crumbled or broken apart by mere hand pressure. When these materials break apart asbestos fibres are then released into the atmosphere. Non-friable ACMs or “manufactured products” are materials that by the nature of their manufacturing/construction do not readily allow the release of asbestos fibres. These materials should not be cut or shaped with power tools, since this procedure may allow for the release of the asbestos fibres.

O. Reg. 278/05 requires that an Asbestos Management Program (AMP) be implemented in buildings that have been identified to contain friable and non-friable ACMs.

A summary list of the bulk samples that were collected during the assessment including a description of the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2.

A copy of the PLM laboratory Certificate of Analysis is provided in Appendix 4.

A summary of occurrences of asbestos-containing materials for areas that were inspected is provided in Appendix 3. Each ACM occurrence includes the following information:

room component that contains ACM;

location of the ACM within the room space;

ACM description;

estimated quantity;

original sample number or representative sample number;

friability; and,

condition.

5.1 Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials

During the assessment, friable ACMs were identified by laboratory analysis to be present at the subject facility in the form of:

insulating cement on pipe fittings.

Refer to Appendix 2 for the type and asbestos content; and Appendix 3 for specific location and condition of these ACMs.

5.2 Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials

During the assessment, non-friable ACMs were identified by laboratory analysis to be present at the subject facility in the form of:

12”x12” vinyl floor tiles.

Page 9: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 5

Refer to Appendix 2 for the type and asbestos content; and Appendix 3 for specific location and condition of these ACMs.

5.3 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

Presumed asbestos-containing materials were observed to be present at the subject facility. The following materials were identified but not sampled:

Window and door caulking materials;

Roof caulking materials;

Roofing materials;

Mastics;

Chalkboards; and,

Cement pipe.

The cement pipe was not sampled due to height limitations. The remaining materials were not sampled during the assessment to avoid damage. The materials were observed to be in good condition. As these materials are known to have been manufactured with asbestos, they should be presumed to be asbestos-containing unless proven otherwise by laboratory analysis.

5.4 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials Refer to Appendix 2 for a list of materials identified as non-asbestos containing through sampling and laboratory analysis.

6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, Jacques Whitford recommends the following with regards to the ACMs and PACMs in the facility assessed:

Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content;

Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05; and,

Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

Page 10: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 6

7.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the Toronto Catholic District School Board. The report may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Jacques Whitford Limited and the Toronto Catholic District School Board.

Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Jacques Whitford Limited accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.

The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. Conclusions presented in this report should not be construed as legal advice.

The conclusions presented in this report represent the best technical judgment of Jacques Whitford Limited based on the data obtained from the work. The conclusions are based on the site conditions encountered by Jacques Whitford Limited at the time the work was performed at the specific assessment and/or sampling locations, and can only be extrapolated to an undefined limited area around these locations. The extent of the limited area depends on building construction and conditions, weather, building usage and other factors. Due to the nature of the investigation and the limited data available, Jacques Whitford Limited cannot warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities.

If any conditions become apparent that differ significantly from our understanding of conditions as presented in this report, we request that we be notified immediately to reassess the conclusions provided herein.

We trust that the above is satisfactory for your purposes at this time. Should you have any questions or concerns, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your convenience.

This report was prepared by Simon Wong and reviewed by Martin Ling and Steven D. Fulford.

Sincerely,

JACQUES WHITFORD LIMITED

ORIGINAL SIGNATURE ON FILE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE ON FILE Simon Wong Steven D. Fulford Report Author Senior Technical Reviewer ORIGINAL SIGNATURE ON FILE Martin Ling Project Manager Enclosures P:\CMiC Jobs\1025xxx\1025760\REPORTS\328 - St. Augustine of Cantebury\328 - St. Augustine - Final Report.docx

Page 11: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of

Asbestos-Containing Materials

Page 12: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario
Page 13: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario
Page 14: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples

for Asbestos Content

Page 15: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos Type and Content

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

328-BS-01A None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern

Room 106 - by windows

328-BS-01B None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern

Room 101

328-BS-01C None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - medium fissure pinhole pattern

Room 103 - by window

328-BS-02A 4% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - light blue with white streaks

Room 126 - door

328-BS-02B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - light blue with white streaks

Room 126 - door

328-BS-02C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - light blue with white streaks

Room 126 - wall

328-BS-03A None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

Room 122

328-BS-03B None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

Room 122A

328-BS-03C None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - small fissure pinhole pattern

Room 121

328-BS-04A 35% Chrysotile PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 112 - boiler room

328-BS-04B SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 112 - boiler room

328-BS-04C SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 112 - boiler room

328-BS-04D SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 112 - boiler room

328-BS-04E SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 112 - boiler room

328-BS-04F SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 112 - boiler room

328-BS-04G SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 112 - boiler room

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

1

Notes:

02-May-08

Page 16: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

328-BS-05A None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissure pinhole pattern

Room 218 - by window

328-BS-05B None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissure pinhole pattern

Room 218 - by window

328-BS-05C None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissure pinhole pattern

Room 218 - center

328-BS-06A None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - random fissure pinhole pattern

Room 217 - by window

328-BS-06B None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - random fissure pinhole pattern

Room 217 - by window

328-BS-06C None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - random fissure pinhole pattern

Room 217 - center

328-BS-07A None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 224 - east wall

328-BS-07B None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 222 - east wall

328-BS-07C None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 222 - east wall

328-BS-07D None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 218 - west wall

328-BS-07E None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 217 - north wall

328-BS-07F None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 216 - north wall

328-BS-07G None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 221 - north wall

328-BS-08A 3% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks

Room 106 - door

328-BS-08B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks

Room 106 - door

328-BS-08C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks

Room 106 - door

328-BS-09A 3% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks

Room 111 - door

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

2

Notes:

02-May-08

Page 17: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

328-BS-09B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks

Room 111 - door

328-BS-09C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks

Room 111C - door

328-BS-10A 4% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with multicolour streaks

Room 105 - closet door

328-BS-10B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with multicolour streaks

Room 105 - door

328-BS-10C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with multicolour streaks

Room 105 - by 104 door

328-BS-11A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smears

Room 127 - door

328-BS-11B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smears

Room 127A - door

328-BS-11C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smears

Room 127C - door

328-BS-12A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with smudges

Room 115A - door

328-BS-12B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with smudges

Room 115 - door

328-BS-12C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with smudges

Room 115A - door closet

328-BS-13A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown smudges

Corridor 116 - by room 117

328-BS-13B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown smudges

Corridor 116 - by room 102

328-BS-13C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown smudges

Corridor 116 - by room 118

328-BS-14A None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greyRoom 122 - closet

328-BS-14B None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greyRoom 122 - door

328-BS-14C None Detected PLMVinyl sheet flooring - greyRoom 122 - door

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

3

Notes:

02-May-08

Page 18: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

328-BS-15A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with dark grey and light grey smudges

Room 122A - door

328-BS-15B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with dark grey and light grey smudges

Room 122B - door

328-BS-15C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with dark grey and light grey smudges

Room 122AB- door

328-BS-16A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with blue smudges

Room 121 - door

328-BS-16B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with blue smudges

Room 121 - door

328-BS-16C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with blue smudges

Room 121 - door

328-BS-17A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - light blue with blue and white smudges

Room 202 - door

328-BS-17B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - light blue with blue and white smudges

Room 203 - door

328-BS-17C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - light blue with blue and white smudges

Room 202 - door

328-BS-18A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smudges

Room 224 - door

328-BS-18B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smudges

Room 224 - door

328-BS-18C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smudges

Room 223 - door

328-BS-19A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smudges

Room 222 - door

328-BS-19B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smudges

Room 212 - door

328-BS-19C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey smudges

Room 213 - door

328-BS-20A 3% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with white streaks

Room 209A - door

328-BS-20B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with white streaks

Room 221 - door

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

4

Notes:

02-May-08

Page 19: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

SampleNumber AnalysisDescription of Sampled

MaterialAsbestos Typeand ContentSampling Location

328-BS-20C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with white streaks

Room 221 - door

328-BS-21A 3% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with grey streaks

Room 211 - door

328-BS-21B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with grey streaks

Room 211 - door

328-BS-21C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with grey streaks

Room 211 - door

328-BS-22A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beigeCorridor 214 - Room 213 doorway

328-BS-22B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beigeCorridor 214 - Room 216 doorway

328-BS-22C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beigeCorridor 214 - Room 215 doorway

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy TEM - Transmission Electron MicroscopyBS - Bulk Samplend - None DetectedSP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

5

Notes:

02-May-08

Page 20: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos

Containing Materials

Page 21: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials

RoomSpecificLocation

ACM Type EstimatedQuantity

SampleNumber

OriginalSample?

Asbestos Content

Friable?Visible?

Access. Comments/Notes

ACMConditionLevel

ACMLocation

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with multicolour streaks

20 sq. m. REF 328-BS-10A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM103 floorthroughout1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with multicolour streaks

24 sq. m. 328-BS-10A Yes 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM105 floorthroughout1

12' x 12' vinyl floor tile - white with grey streaks

56 sq. m. 328-BS-08A Yes 3% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM106 floorthroughout1

cement pipe 5 m ns No ns No Yes C good PACM - INACCESSIBLE

DUE TO HEIGHT

LIMITATIONS

111 mechanicalbelow ceiling1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown streaks

295 sq. m. 328-BS-09A Yes 3% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM111, 111A, 111C floorthroughout1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 7-10 fittings REF 328-BS-04A No 35% chrysotile No Yes C good ACM111, 111C mechanicalbelow ceiling1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 80-85 fittings 328-BS-04A Yes 35% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM112 mechanicalbelow ceiling1

12' x 12' vinyl floor tile - light blue with white streaks

24 sq. m. REF 328-BS-02A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM114 floorthroughout1

12' x 12' vinyl floor tile - light blue with white streaks

12 sq. m. 328-BS-02A Yes 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM126 floorthroughout1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 12-15 fittings REF 328-BS-04A No 35% chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACMStairs D mechanicalbelow ceiling1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with white streaks

12 sq. m. 328-BS-20A Yes 3% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM209A floorthroughout2

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with grey streaks

15 sq. m. 328-BS-21A Yes 3% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM211 floorthroughout2

Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.

A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos

Accessibility Classification

Visibility

Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample

1

* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.

Notes:

02-May-08

Page 22: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

RoomSpecificLocation

ACM Type EstimatedQuantity

SampleNumber

OriginalSample?

Asbestos Content

Friable?Visible?

Access. Comments/Notes

ACMConditionLevel

ACMLocation

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - yellow with white streaks

16 sq. m. REF 328-BS-20A No 3% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM221 floorthroughout2

Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.

A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos

Accessibility Classification

Visibility

Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample

2

* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.

Notes:

02-May-08

Page 23: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos:

Polarized Light Microscopy

Page 24: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-01A050702944-0001

Room 106 - By Windows

Tan/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose40%Glass20%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-01B050702944-0002

Room 101 Tan/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose35%Glass20%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)25%

328-BS-01C050702944-0003

Room 103 - By Window

Tan/Copper None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose30%Glass35%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-02A050702944-0004

Room 126 - Door Blue/BlackNon-FibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile4%Ca Carbonate40%Non-fibrous (other)56%

328-BS-02B050702944-0005

Room 126 - Door Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-02C050702944-0006

Room 126 - Wall Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-03A050702944-0007

Room 122 White/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose30%Glass30%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)20%

1

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 25: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-03B050702944-0008

Room 122A White/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose25%Glass35%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-03C050702944-0009

Room 121 White/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose20%Glass35%Min. Wool25%

Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-04A050702944-0010

Room 112 - Boiler Room

GrayFibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile35%Cellulose20% Non-fibrous (other)45%

328-BS-04B050702944-0011

Room 112 - Boiler Room

Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-04C050702944-0012

Room 112 - Boiler Room

Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-04D050702944-0013

Room 112 - Boiler Room

Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-04E050702944-0014

Room 112 - Boiler Room

Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

2

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 26: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-04F050702944-0015

Room 112 - Boiler Room

Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-04G050702944-0016

Room 112 - Boiler Room

Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-05A050702944-0017

Room 218 - By Window

White/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose30%Glass30%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-05B050702944-0018

Room 218 - By Window

White/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose35%Glass25%Min. Wool20%

Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-05C050702944-0019

Room 218 - Center White/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose30%Glass20%Min. Wool40%

Non-fibrous (other)10%

328-BS-06A050702944-0020

Room 217 - By Window

White/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose20%Glass30%Min. Wool30%

Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-06B050702944-0021

Room 217 - By Window

White/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose15%Glass30%Min. Wool15%

Non-fibrous (other)40%

3

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 27: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-06C050702944-0022

Room 217 - Center White/Gray None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose20%Glass30%Min. Wool15%

Non-fibrous (other)35%

328-BS-07A050702944-0023

Room 224 - East Wall

Gray/White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose6% Ca Carbonate45%Non-fibrous (other)49%

328-BS-07B050702944-0024

Room 222 - East Wall

Gray/White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose8% Ca Carbonate55%Non-fibrous (other)37%

328-BS-07C050702944-0025

Room 222 - East Wall

Gray/White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose6% Ca Carbonate55%Non-fibrous (other)39%

328-BS-07D050702944-0026

Room 218 - West Wall

Gray/White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose8% Ca Carbonate60%Non-fibrous (other)32%

328-BS-07E050702944-0027

Room 217 - North Wall

Gray/Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose3% Ca Carbonate65%Non-fibrous (other)32%

328-BS-07F050702944-0028

Room 216 - North Wall

Gray/Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose4% Ca Carbonate60%Non-fibrous (other)36%

328-BS-07G050702944-0029

Room 221 - North Wall

Gray/Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose7% Ca Carbonate70%Non-fibrous (other)23%

4

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 28: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-08A050702944-0030

Room 106 - Door White/GrayNon-FibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile3%Ca Carbonate65%Non-fibrous (other)32%

328-BS-08B050702944-0031

Room 106 - Door Tan/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-08C050702944-0032

Room 106 - Door White/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-09A050702944-0033

Room 111 - Door Beige/BrownNon-FibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile3%Ca Carbonate70%Non-fibrous (other)27%

328-BS-09B050702944-0034

Room 111 - Door White/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-09C050702944-0035

Room 111C - Door White/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-10A050702944-0036

Room 105 - Closet Door

Beige/VariousNon-FibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile4%Ca Carbonate60%Non-fibrous (other)36%

328-BS-10B050702944-0037

Room 105 - Door White/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

5

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 29: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-10C050702944-0038

Room 105 - By 104 Door

White/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-11A050702944-0039

Room 127 - Door White/Gray/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate80%Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-11B050702944-0040

Room 127A - Door White/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-11C050702944-0041

Room 127C - Door White/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate75%Non-fibrous (other)25%

328-BS-12A050702944-0042

Room 115A - Door Beige/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate80%Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-12B050702944-0043

Room 115 - Door Beige/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose3% Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)12%

328-BS-12C050702944-0044

Room 115A - Door Closet

Beige/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-13A050702944-0045

Corridor 116 - By Room 117

Beige/Brown None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

6

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 30: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-13B

050702944-0046

Corridor 116 - By Room 102

Beige/Brown/Yellow

None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate80%Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-13C050702944-0047

Corridor 116 - By Room 118

Beige/Brown None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate90%Non-fibrous (other)10%

328-BS-14A050702944-0048

Room 122 - Closet Gray/Tan/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose10% Non-fibrous (other)90%

328-BS-14B050702944-0049

Room 122 - Door Gray/Tan/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose6% Non-fibrous (other)94%

328-BS-14C050702944-0050

Room 122 - Door Gray/Tan/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose7% Non-fibrous (other)93%

328-BS-15A050702944-0051

Room 122A - Door Gray/Black None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-15B050702944-0052

Room 122B - Door Gray/Black None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate90%Non-fibrous (other)10%

328-BS-15C050702944-0053

Room 122AB - Door

Gray/Black/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate90%Non-fibrous (other)10%

7

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 31: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-16A050702944-0054

Room 121 - Door White/Blue/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-16B050702944-0055

Room 121 - Door White/Blue/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate80%Non-fibrous (other)20%

328-BS-16C050702944-0056

Room 121 - Door White/Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-17A050702944-0057

Room 202 - Door White/Blue/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate75%Non-fibrous (other)25%

328-BS-17B050702944-0058

Room 203 - Door White/Blue/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose3% Ca Carbonate80%Non-fibrous (other)17%

328-BS-17C050702944-0059

Room 202 - Door Blue/White/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-18A050702944-0060

Room 224 - Door Gray/White/Black None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-18B050702944-0061

Room 224 - Door White/Gray/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose8% Ca Carbonate72%Non-fibrous (other)20%

8

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 32: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-18C050702944-0062

Room 223 - Door Gray/White/Yellow None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate75%Non-fibrous (other)25%

328-BS-19A050702944-0063

Room 222 - Door Blue/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate95%Non-fibrous (other)5%

328-BS-19B050702944-0064

Room 212 - Door White/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-19C050702944-0065

Room 213 - Door White/Gray None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate90%Non-fibrous (other)10%

328-BS-20A050702944-0066

Room 209A - Door Yellow/White/BlackNon-FibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile3%Ca Carbonate85%Non-fibrous (other)12%

328-BS-20B050702944-0067

Room 221 - Door Gray/Black Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-20C050702944-0068

Room 221 - Door Gray/Black Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-21A050702944-0069

Room 211 - Door Gray/BlackNon-FibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile3%Cellulose5% Ca Carbonate74%Non-fibrous (other)18%

9

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 33: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

050702944

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760P985Received: 08/23/07 11:39 AM

1025760 Phase 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:9/5/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 9/5/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.1056 Stelton Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854Phone: (732) 981-0550 Fax: (732) 981-0551 Email: [email protected]

328-BS-21B050702944-0070

Room 211 - Door Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-21C050702944-0071

Room 211 - Door Gray/Black Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

328-BS-22A050702944-0072

Corridor 214 - Room 213 Doorway

Beige/Black None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose8% Ca Carbonate75%Non-fibrous (other)17%

328-BS-22B050702944-0073

Corridor 214 - Room 216 Doorway

Beige/Black None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose10% Ca Carbonate75%Non-fibrous (other)15%

328-BS-22C050702944-0074

Corridor 214 - Room 215 Doorway

Beige/Black None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Ca Carbonate65%Non-fibrous (other)35%

Individual sample layers combined and analyzed as on at client request

10

Chaiyut Sae Lao, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL Piscataway (NY State ELAP #11423, NVLAP #101048-2)

Maurice Carchman (74)

Page 34: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos

Containing Materials

Page 35: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 Appendix 5-1

Criteria for Assessing Asbestos Containing Materials

A description of the criteria used in evaluating the condition, accessibility and exposure risk of asbestos-containing materials is provided below. The criteria is generally based on the Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised 1999/07/16) and industry standards of practice.

Assessment of Condition

Spray Applied Fireproofing, Insulation and Textured Finishes

In evaluating the condition of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, thermal insulation or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes, the following criteria apply:

Good

Surface of material shows no significant signs of damage, deterioration or delamination. Up to one percent visible damage to surface is allowed within range of GOOD. Evaluation of sprayed fireproofing requires the Assessor to be familiar with the irregular surface texture typical of sprayed asbestos products. GOOD condition includes unencapsulated or unpainted fireproofing or texture finishes, where no delamination or damage is observed, and encapsulated fireproofing or texture finishes where the encapsulation has been applied after the damage or fallout occurred.

Poor

Sprayed materials show signs of damage, delamination or deterioration. More than one percent damage to surface of ACM spray.

In observation areas, where damage exists in isolated locations, both GOOD and POOR condition may be reported. The extent or percentage of each condition will be recorded on the Assessor reassessment form.

FAIR condition is not utilized or considered as a valid criterion in the evaluation of sprayed fireproofing, sprayed insulation, or texture coat finishes.

The evaluation of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, non-mechanical thermal insulation, or texture, decorative or acoustic finishes which are present above ceilings, may be limited by the number of observations made, and by building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct the above ceiling observations. Persons entering the ceiling area are advised to be watchful for ACM DEBRIS prior to accessing or working above ceilings in areas of building with ACM, regardless of the reported condition.

Other ACM

In evaluating the condition of mechanical insulation (on boilers, breaching, ductwork, piping, tanks, equipment etc.) the following criteria are used:

Page 36: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 Appendix 5-2

Good

Insulation is completely covered in jacketing and exhibits no evidence of damage or deterioration. No insulation is exposed. Includes conditions where the jacketing has minor surface damage (i.e., scuffs or stains), but the jacketing is not penetrated.

Fair

Minor penetration damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or delamination) or undamaged insulation that has never been jacketed. Insulation is exposed but not showing surface disintegration. The extent of missing insulation ranges should be minor to none.

Poor

Original insulation jacket is missing, damaged, deteriorated or delaminated. Insulation is exposed and significant areas have been dislodged. Damage cannot be readily repaired. The evaluation of mechanical insulation may be limited by the number of observations made and building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct observations. In these circumstances, it is not possible to observe each foot of mechanical insulation from all angles.

Non-Friable and Potentially Friable Materials

Non-friable materials generally have little potential to release airborne fibres, even when damaged by mechanical breakage. However, some non-friable materials, i.e., exterior asbestos cement products, may have deteriorated so that the binder no longer effectively contains the asbestos fibres. In such cases of significantly deteriorated non-friable material, the material will be treated as a friable product.

Evaluation of Accessibility

The accessibility of building materials known or suspected of being ACM is rated according to the following criteria:

Access (A)

Areas of the building within reach of all building users. Includes areas such as gymnasiums, workshops, and storage areas where activities of the building users may result in disturbance of ACM not normally within reach from floor level.

Access (B)

Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladder. Includes: frequently entered pipe chases, tunnels and service areas or areas within reach from a fixed ladder or catwalk, i.e., tops of equipment, mezzanines.

Access (C) Exposed

Areas of the building above 8'0" where use of a ladder is required to reach the ACM. Only refers to ACM materials that are exposed to view, from the floor or ladder, without removing or opening other building components such as ceiling tiles, or service access doors or hatches. Does not include infrequently accessed service areas of the building.

Page 37: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 Appendix 5-3

Access (C) Concealed

Areas of the building which require the removal of a building component, including lay-in ceilings and access panels into solid ceiling systems. Includes rarely entered crawl spaces, attic spaces, etc. Observations are limited to the extent visible from the access points.

Access (D)

Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc. where demolition of the ceiling, wall or equipment, etc., is required to reach the ACM. Evaluation of the condition and extent of ACM is limited or impossible, depending on the Assessor's ability to visually examine the materials In Access D.

Page 38: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions

Page 39: 328 - St. Augustine - Final Report · 2016-07-28 · ON St. Augustine Catholic School 98 Shoreham Drive Toronto, Ontario May 2, 2008 Jacques Whitford 7271 Warden Avenue Markham, Ontario

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 May 2, 2008 Appendix 6-1

Terms and Definitions

Asbestos

Any of the following asbestiform silicate minerals: actinolite asbestos, anthophyllite asbestos, chrysotile, crocidolite, cumming tonite-grunerite asbestos (amosite), tremolite asbestos with a dry weight concentration greater than 0.5%.

Friable

Capable of being crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

HEPA Filter

A high efficiency particulate aerosol filter that is at least 99.97 per cent efficient in collecting a 0.3 micrometre aerosol.

Homogeneous Material

A material that is uniform in colour and texture

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

Polarized Light Microscopy is a technique accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency as a screening method for detecting asbestos fibres in bulk material samples.

Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials (PACMs)

Materials that are known to have been manufactured contain asbestos. Testing of the material is required to determine if the material contains asbestos fibres.

Recommended Corrective Actions (RCAs)

Areas identified to consist of asbestos-containing or presumed asbestos-containing materials that require attention to repair or remove damaged materials.

Building

Any structure, vault, chamber or tunnel including, without limitation, the electrical, plumbing, heating and air handling equipment (including rigid duct work) of the structure, vault, chamber or tunnel.