30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6...

13
30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science Institute) + GOODS (Alexander, Bauer, Brandt, Chary, Conselice, Cristiani, Daddi, Dickinson, Elbaz, Grogin, Mainieri, Tozzi,..) + COSMOS-XMM (Brusa, Comastri, Elvis, Finoguenov, Fiore, Gilli, Hasinger, Impey, Mainieri, Salvato, ..)
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    212
  • download

    0

Transcript of 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6...

Page 1: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 1

EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6

and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer (Space Telescope Science Institute)

+ GOODS (Alexander, Bauer, Brandt, Chary, Conselice, Cristiani, Daddi, Dickinson, Elbaz, Grogin,

Mainieri, Tozzi,..)

+ COSMOS-XMM (Brusa, Comastri, Elvis, Finoguenov, Fiore, Gilli, Hasinger, Impey, Mainieri,

Salvato, ..)

Page 2: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 2

Large X-ray/optical/IR surveys are opening up new regions of parameter space:

Depth probes faint end of AGN LF to high zArea probes high end of AGN LF at high zCombined optical + X-ray depth allows wider

exploration of FX/FOpt and new populations

FOpt (mag)

log

FX (

erg

s-1cm

-2)

AGN Relevant surveys:

GOODS/CDFN+S (15’)E-CDFS (30’)XMM-LH (30’)EGS (10’x 60’)COSMOS (1.4o x 1.4o) ..

Page 3: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 3

FX/FOpt parameter space:AGN typically ~1-2 dexSB are lower Fx/Fopt

Highest FX/FOpt:“EXO’s” - Extreme X-ray /

Optical sources:– Fx/Fopt > ~100– Only revealed by

extending optical depthbelow i or z ~ 24 - 25

– Appear to have no comparable analogs in the local universe

Why do we only start seeing them at faint magnitudes?What produces the high FX/FOpt - these sources likely

consist of two sub-populations:– Balmer break: z ~ 2 - 3 evolved or dusty hosts (DRGs,

EROs)– Lyman break: candidate z > 6-7 agn

FX/Fopt =

0.1

FX/Fopt = 10

Page 4: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 4

Fx/Fopt vs Colour:Sources with low FX/FOpt

are generally blue: low-zstar-forming galaxies

Some blue sources alsohave FX/FOpt typical ofunobscured AGN- quasars

Moderately red galaxies(z - K > 2) all have higherFX/FOpt, obscured AGN

Reddest z - K sources: for z - K > 4, FX/FOpt increases to ~ 10 - 100x the value

for even typical obscured AGNNot a selection effect:

– high FX/FOpt should not necessarily imply bright IR flux

Thus red opt/IR colour is intrinsic characteristic of EXOs

Page 5: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 5

Previous studies of optically faint X-ray sources:

Initial Deep Chandra/XMM fields revealed that ~20-30% ofX-ray sources are “optically faint”, R > 24(Koekemoer et al. 2002, Tozzi et al. 2002)

Most optically faint sources are also X-ray faint, ie have fairly normal FX/FOpt typical of obscured AGN at z ~ 1-3 (Brusa et al. 2003, Mainieri et al. 2004, Fiore et al 2005)

Some optically faint sources are ERO’s (z ~ 1-1.5) - but also have normal FX/FOpt (Stevens et al. 2003, Yan et al. 2003, Rigby et al. 2005)

EXO’s:Optically faint sources with anomalously high FX/FOpt

>100No apparent local analogs at brighter magnitudesTypically have redder z-K than ERO’s (Koekemoer et al.

2004, 2006)

Page 6: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 6

Nature of EXOs:Need further IR constraints on SED to determine which

sub-population a given EXO belongs to based on its red opt/IR:

– Balmer break (z ~ 2 - 3 evolved or dusty populations)– Lyman break (z >6 AGN)

NOTE: expect EXOs to contain both z~2-3 and z>6 sources

Spitzer data:currently based purely on GOODS CDFS + HDFN

(Dickinson)all EXOs are detected in IRAC data:

– red K - IRAC colour– across IRAC, have a mixture of SEDs (red, flat or blue)

MIPS detections/non-detections are consistent with IRAC properties:

– flat/red IRAC -> MIPS detections, usually brighter than IRAC– blue IRAC colours -> generally undetected in MIPS

Page 7: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 7

HST/ACS SPITZER/IRAC MIPS

HST/ACS VLT/ISAAC SPITZER/IRAC

Page 8: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 8

Page 9: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 9

SED fitting:Parameters SSP + constant SFR, reddening, IMF, dust Models:

– initally used CB2003– will also now include Maraston

Results:Most EXOs are

well fit by:– z ~ 2 - 3– evolved– ~1010-11 Mo

Some requirereddening AV ~1

A few EXOs arenot well fit byz ~ 2 - 3 models

Page 10: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 10

Using EXOs to trace high-z AGN evolution:AGN regulate galaxy growth / SFR via feedbackmay trace hierarchical dark matter halospossibly different types of accretion mechanisms:

– luminous AGN may trace major mergers– lower-luminosity AGN may trace more minor interactions and

accretion events (e.g. Merloni et al. 2004)Hasinger etal. luminosity-dependent density evolution LDDE:

– High-lum AGN grow earlier in universe, peak at z ~ 2– Lower-lum AGN peak much later, z~1, decline by 10x to z=0

Questions:how does the faint end of the AGN LF evolve beyond z ~6?does obscured/unobscured AGN ratio increase beyond z ~6? does more rapid evolution of high-lum AGN trace merging

history of spheroid formation? (e.g, Franceschini et al 1999)

Page 11: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 11

Using EXOs to count high-z AGN in GOODS:Use XLF to estimate expected number of optically

unidentified sources as a function of redshiftMost of the optically unidentified AGN are evolved

interlopers at intermediate z > 2Compare with observed number of undetected

sources:– use existing X-ray detection limits– apply optical detection cut-off (z(AB) ~ 27.5 for ACS)

Integrate over X-ray luminosities at each redshift binassume Type 1/2 ratio found in GOODS by Treister et

alUse the difference to calculate cumulative number

N(>6)Compare with N(>6) from XLF

Page 12: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 12

Predict optically unidentified sources in each redshift bin using Hasinger et al. LDDE description, extrapolating upto z ~ 7

Apply to GOODS X-rayselection, including theoptical detection limits, tocalculate EXOs expected.

Number of optically unID’d sources N(z) based onz(AB)=27.5 limit, for currentChandra catalogs:

LDDE predicts 9 - 16 EXOs in GOODS (out of 607 X-ray sources):

– 8-13 should be at z ~ 2 - 5– 1-3 should be at z ~ 6 - 7

Actually detect 13 EXOs:– SED modelling confirms

that 10 are at z ~ 2 - 4– 3 are indeterminate

Page 13: 30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice1 EXOs: Candidate AGN at z ≥ 6 and intermediate-z evolved populations Anton Koekemoer.

30 March 2006 Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Times, Venice 13

Conclusions:Number of EXO’s found in GOODS agrees well with that

expected based on LDDE (13 vs 9-16, respectively)Number of intermediate-z interlopers among EXOs also

agrees with expected from LDDE (10/13 vs 8-13/9-16)Remaining number of 3 EXOs in GOODS with possible

high redshifts (ie > 6) is consistent with the 1-3 EXOs expected at z > 6 based on extending LDDE to z ~ 6 – 7

Therefore LDDE appears to extend up to at least z ~ 6 - 7

This suggests that AGN growth/accretion mechanisms continue to track galaxy growth into reionization:

– AGN feedback regulating star formation up to early epochs– black holes tracing dark matter halos since at least z ~ 7

Future:extend to COSMOS to improve LF constraints (whenever

Spitzer catalogs are available for SED fitting..)