30 4ateria& andshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/61755/11/11_chapter 3.pdfField application...
Transcript of 30 4ateria& andshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/61755/11/11_chapter 3.pdfField application...
30 4ateria&and
methods
3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1. COLLECTION OF RAW MATERIALS
The waste materials were obtained from nearby poultry farm, orchard, cow's farm
and goat's herd etc. Coir waste was collected from Tenkasi, which is one among the
largest producers of coir fibre in Tamil Nadu. Biofertilizers like Phizobium and
Azospirillwn were collected from Agricultural Extension Centre, Alangulam. The
collected materials were stored sally in Sri Paramakalyani Centre for Environmental
Sciences for production of composts and maintaining organic manure stock.
List of different materials utilized are goat manure, vermicompost, coir pith
compost, neem compost, pig manure, poultry manure, farm yard manure (FYM), ground
nut oil cake, agricultural biomass (crop residues), Eichhornia crossipes, Ipomea cornea,
Coiotrophis gigantia, Cassia auriculata, Coleus parvWorus etc..
3.2. COMPOSTING OF ORGANIC MATERIALS
31.1. VERMICOMPOSTING
The raw materials used for vermicomposting are leaf litter and cow dung. The
earthworm species used for verniicomposting was Lampito mauritii - an anecic
indigenous species. The vermi pits were prepared in the dimension of 2x2xlm. The
bottom layer was filled with pebbles and sand, which Infiltrate the excess water from the
composting pit. The second layer was filled with rich garden soil and old compost as
noculuxn. The worms were introduced on the old compost layer. Cow dung and leaf
EEO
litter were mixed at the rate of 1:2 ratio and added in the pit as a feed for the earthworms.
Finally the pit was covered by coconut fronds in order to prevent moisture evaporation
by direct sunlight and to protect the earthworms from its natural predators. Water was
sprinkled once in 2 or 3 days, the contents of the pit were turned once in a week for even
decomposition and enhanced aeration. After 60 days the matured compost was collected,
sieved and packed.
3.2.2. COIR COMPOSTING
The coir waste was composted by using Pie urotus sajorcaju - an oyster
mushroom and urea. S bottles of mushroom spawn per ton and 0.5 % urea as a nitrogen
source were used. The coir waste was spreaded in layers with mushroom spawn and urea
in alternate layers. The compost heap was given turning fortnightly. The heap was
moistened with water spray on alternate days. After 60 days the compost was matured
and was ready for field application.
3.2.3. NEEM LEAF COMPOST
The dried neem leaves collected from our campus was used to form a heap along
with cow dung for 20 days of initial decomposition because of which the
vermicomposting of the same was made easier. The cow dung and neem leaves were
added in the 1:4 ratio. Vermicomposting of predigested neem leaves combined with cow
dung was carried out as given in sub heading 3.2.1.
41
3.2.4. GREEN MANURES
The green manures collected were directly applied to the paddy field during the
first ploughing, where the decomposition of green manures took place. The green
manures include Eichhornia crassipes, Ipomea cornea, Calotrophis gigantia Cassia
auricutata and Coleus parvflorus.
3.3. FIELD APPLICATION STUDIES33.1. SELECTION OF FIELD
The compost produced by various methods and other manures collected from
various sources has been taken to field trial experiments. The field selected is located in
Karambai near Kallidalkurichi. The selected field was levelled and applied with pond silt
® 15 tons per hectare. This is to minimize the residual effect of the chemical fertilizers
once used. The plots were made in randomized block design (RBD) manner and
triplicates for each treatment were put.
33.2. CROP S11LCTION AND TREATMENTS
Field application of organic manures was carried out on crop cultivation viz., soy
bean, paddy and black gram. The variety of soy bean used for the present study was
for paddy It was 'white ponni' and that of black gram was 'Co-3'. The field was
partitioned into many small plots. The plot size for soybean and black gram was 20 in2
and for paddy it was 30 in2. The plots were put in randomized block design manner. Soil
bond was made in between each plot in order to minimize the seepage effect to the
maximum possible way. Vermicompost was applied at the rate of S tons per hectare and
green manures were applied at the rate of 12 tons per hectare. The dosage were made as
per the recommendations of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU). The field
application studies were carried out during the following period.
.7 '! •'
•..-
7
•.. No,..,
ZoLA
• t '' i- -^,
7.• 'y V4Vj. f.'"!
,.'/'4k t•1
4
rLILIE 3
PREPARATION OF LAND FOR ORGANIC CULTIVATION
.•:' :> ••
-
Awl
-
.. f• .• ..--,'
'i
I•r_-4- -'i, - _i
_
I!COMPOST PREPARATION
VEIIMICOMPOSTINC COlD PITH COMPOSTING
42
Soy bean (Glycine max) - from May 2000 to July - 2000
Paddy (Oryza saliva) - from October 2000 to January - 2001
• Black gram( Vigna mungo) - from February to April - 2001
The following were the treatments for the soybean and black gram field application
studies
TI - Control plot (with out application of any manures)
12 - Goat manure applied plot
T3 - Vermicompost applied plot
T4 - Coir compost applied plot
T5 - Neem compost applied plot
16 - Pig manure applied plot
T7 - Poultry manure applied plot
T8 - Farm yard manure applied plot
19 - Biofertilizer (Rhizobium) applied plot
0\ 00 - N - Q 00 r- 00 N
N r r e ('1 .j '
C
r 00 N__ N N *N V 00 N _ ' I
r -
0000 - \C N 00 00— N . *- N
kn
0. r N — N \O4)
N N \C 00 00 N 00 O CN*
N -. N t - C14 N N
L)
N \O 00 N 'O C 00 *
t N O .- - N N _ - N
tn
N N -
if 00
- - - N
C14 00kn00ci© oo v
- • - - N - -
t-N Q\ - Ntn C4
CZ
z - -
4) 4) CI
4) o0
QCh•
ca rz3 0 _
E oLn
It
E
4)
c)
1.0
C
0
0
EC0
4)
z
4)
H
4)0
*4
The following were the treatments for paddy cultivation with different organic manures
Ti - Control plot (with out application of any manures)
T2 - Goat manure applied plot
T3 - Vermicompost applied plot
T4 - Coir compost applied plot
T5 - Neem compost applied plot
16 - Pig manure applied plot
T7 - Poultry manure applied plot
18- Farm yard manure applied plot
19- Biofertiizer (Azospirillum) applied plot
T10 - Eichhornia crasipes applied plot
111 - Ipomea cornea applied plot
TI 2- Calotrophis gigantea applied plot
T13- Cassia auriculata applied plot
T14- Coleus parv Worus biomass (waste product) applied plot
115- Agricultural biomass (crop residues of belmoschus esculentus,
Beta vulgaris, Raphanus salivus, Alium cepa etc..) applied plot
T16 - Ground nut oil cake applied plot
The following were the treatments for paddy cultivation with different organic manuresand vermicompost
117 - Goat manure and vermicompost applied plot
Ti 8- Coir pith compost and vermicompost applied plot
119- Neem compost and vermicompost applied plot
T20- Pig manure and vermicompost applied plot
T21-Poultry manure and vermicompost applied plot
122 - Farm yard manure and vermicompost applied plot
T23 - Biofertilizer (Azospirillum) and vermicompost applied plot
T24 - Eichhornia crasipes and vermicompost applied plot
T25 - Ipomea cornea and vermicompost applied plot
T26 - Calorrophis giganlea and vermicompost applied plot
T27 - Cassia auriculata and vermicompost applied plot
45
T28 - Co1euparvjflorus biomass and vermicompost applied plotT29 - Agricultural wastes (crop residues of Abelmoschus esculentus,
Beta vulgaris, Raphanus sativus, Alium cepa etc..) and vermiconipost applied plotT30 - Ground nut oil cake and vermicompost applied plot
3.3.3. SOIL SAMPLING
The soil samples of all the trial plots were collected periodically. For soybean
and black gram growth studies the soil sampling was done on 25th day (first stage), 50th
day (second stage) and 75th day (third stage) and for paddy on 40 th day (first stage), 80th
day (second stage) and the day of harvesting (third stage). Wedge shaped cuts about half
a feet depth were made in the field away from the bunds in different locations of a plot,
the soil along the wedge surface was scraped, collected and pooled together. The
collected samples were kept in a polythene pack in order to protect the soil flora and to
maintain the moisture content of the soil.
3.3.4. SOIL ANALYSIS
The collected soil samples were taken for bacterial, fungal and actinomycetes
count. After enumeration of microbial count and estimation of moisture content the
collected samples were dried. This was to prevent the evaporation of nutrients from the
samples. The physicochemical properties like electrical conductivity, pH, bulk density,
porosity, water holding capacity, moisture content, NPK and micro nutrients were
analyzed. The methods used for the analysis of the samples are as follows.
1 Physical parameters
a) pH - Jackson, 1973
b) Electrical conductivity (EC) - Jackson, 1973
C)
Bulk density (BD) - Tandon, 1993
d) Porosity -Chandraboseet.aL, 1988
e) Moisture content - Chandrabose et. a/., 1988
0
Water holding capacity - Chandrabose et.al., 1988
ii Chemical parameters
a) Estimation of Nitrogen - Kjeldahl method
b) Estimation of Phosphorus - Colorimetric method
c) Estimation of Potassium - Flame photometric method
d) Estimation of Calcium & Magnesium— As above
e) Estimation of Zinc & Copper - Atomic AbsorptionSpectroscopy (AAS)
f) Estimation of Iron - Spectrophotometric method
g) Estimation of Manganese - Spectrophotometric method
iii Microbiological parameters
a) Enumeration of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes
46
Tandon, 1993
Tandon, 1993
Tandon, 1993
Tandon, 1993
Tandon, 1993
Jackson, 1973
Chopra andKanwar, (1991)
Allen, 1953
3.3.5. GROWTH PARAMETERS
The sampling was done during the initial (25th day), intermediate (50th day) and
final stages (75th day) of crop cultivation. From the triplicate plot a plant from each
plot/pot was randomly picked out carefully and examined for its various growth
parameters. From the triplicate for each parameter mean value was calculated. The
growth parameters including root length, shoot length, number of nodules, leaves, pods
flowers, buds and fresh & dry weight were observed.
Root length
The plants were picked out carefully and the length of the root system was
measured using a scale and recorded in centimetre (cm).
47
Shoot length
The length of the shoot system from the base to the shoot tip was measured using
a scale and recorded in centimetre (cm).
Inter nodal distance (IND)
The inter nodal distance observed in between two nodes of the shoot system was
measured using a scale and recorded in centimetre (cm).
Number of nodules, leaves, flowers and pods
The number of nodules, leaves, flowers and pods were counted and recorded in
the observation book.
Fresh weight
The fresh weight of the whole plant was weighed using a physical balance and
was recorded in grams (g).
Dry weight
The dry weight of the whole plant was taken by sun drying them for two days and
then keeping them in hot air oven for 12 hours. After that, it was weighed using a
physical balance and was recorded in grams (g).
Yield
The yield from each triplicate plot was collected and weighed in kilograms (kg).
The mean of them was calculated, this was yield obtained from twenty square metres.
From that, yield per hectare in terms of tons was calculated.
48
3.4. POT CULTURE STUDIES
The pot culture studies were carried out in Sri Paramakalyani Centre for
Environmental Sciences, Aiwarkurichi. The pots were filled with organic manures, sand
and red soil at 1:2:3 ratio. Each treatment was made in triplicate. The same composition
and number of treatments were chosen for soybean and black gram. The following are the
T9 - Biofertilizer (A.zospirillum) applied pot
T10 — VC + Goat manure applied pot
TI 1 - VC + Coir compost applied pot
T12 - VC + Neem compost applied pot
T13 - VC + Pig manure applied pot
T14 - VC + Poultry manure applied pot
T15 - VC + Farm yard manure applied pot
T16 - VC + Biofertilizer (Azospiri/Iwn)applied pot
treatments for pot culture of paddy.
T —Control pot
T2 - Goat manure applied pot
T3 - Vermicompost applied pot
T4 - Coir pith compost applied pot
T5 - Neem compost applied pot
T6 - Pig manure applied pot
T7 - Poultry manure applied pot
T8 - Farm yard manure applied pot
3.5. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The data on various physico-chemical characteristics of soil samples and growth
parameters of the experimental plants were fed into computer and mean values (X) with
SE were obtained. The differences in the mean values of experimental physico-chemical
analysis were tested for their statistical significance using ANOVA (Analysis of
Variance) test and 'Q' test.