3 September 2015 Tighes Hill Remediation Project...

27
This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Actual future conditions (including economic conditions, energy demand, and energy supply) could differ materially due to changes in technology, the development of new supply sources, political events, demographic changes, and other factors discussed herein (and in Item 1A of ExxonMobils latest report on Form 10-K or information set forth under "factors affecting future results" on the "investors" page of our website at www.exxonmobil.com). This material is not to be reproduced without the permission of Exxon Mobil Corporation. Tighes Hill Remediation Project Update 3 September 2015

Transcript of 3 September 2015 Tighes Hill Remediation Project...

This presentation includes forward-looking statements. Actual future conditions (including economic conditions, energy demand, and energy supply) could differ materially due to changes in technology,

the development of new supply sources, political events, demographic changes, and other factors discussed herein (and in Item 1A of ExxonMobil’s latest report on Form 10-K or information set forth

under "factors affecting future results" on the "investors" page of our website at www.exxonmobil.com). This material is not to be reproduced without the permission of Exxon Mobil Corporation.

Tighes Hill Remediation Project Update

3 September 2015

• Introduction

• Site History

• Investigation Works and Remediation Planning

• Remediation Project Status

• Community Communications

• Questions?

Agenda

Tighes Hill former Terminal & Depot

• 3.7 ha site located

at 110 Elizabeth

Street, Tighes Hill

Site History

• 1936 - Atlantic Union Oil Co

petroleum bulk handling Terminal,

Depot vacant

• 1962 – Atlantic changed name to

Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Pty

Ltd, wharf pipeline constructed

• 1980s – Depot started as Esso

trucking terminal

• 1991 – Site purchased by Mobil -

Terminal operations ceased.

Depot continued as Mobil

distributor trucking terminal

• 1994-96 – Depot operations

ceased

• 1997-99 – Demolition – all tanks

removed

• 2008 – Demolition final – removal

of office and gatehouse

Terminal & Depot (looking SE)

Entrance to Terminal - 2008

• Office and Gatehouse prior to demolition

7

Investigation Works

Test Pits

Desktop Phase 1 ESA Boreholes/Wells Off-site ESA incl vapour

sampling In Kings Rd

Groundwater Monitoring

To assess:

• background

• history

To investigate:

• geology

• hydrogeology

• site impacts

To understand

• seasonal changes

• trends

8

Investigation Works (cont’d)

• LIF=capability to ‘see’ LNAPL with depth

• 41 locations across Terminal

• Used to verify/delineate extent of LNAPL

• Helps better target remediation efforts

Laser Induced Fluorescence (LIF

Some

molecules

emit light

9

Investigation Works (cont’d)

LIF Results

• LNAPL extends through eastern

central part of the Terminal, to max

depth of 2.6m (central part)

• LNAPL occurrence from both LIF

and soil bores has good correlation

• LNAPL largely residualised, not

mobile Detailed investigation =

better understanding

10

Conceptual Site Model (CSM)

Geology and Hydrogeology

• Fill (up to 1.5 m thick) underlain by natural sand/clay

• Shallow groundwater within fill and natural material

Impacts

• LNAPL – isolated well locations at depot (north

west) and terminal (central east)

• Adsorbed and dissolved HC impacts ‘mirror’ the

LNAPL.

• Impacts confined to site and considered stable

Receptors incl qualitative risk assessment

• On-site commercial site users and maintenance

workers

• Off-site commercial users and maintenance workrs

• Off-site residents

• Environment of Throsby Creek

CSM =

picture of

environmental

data gathered

11

Remedial Pilot Trials

Pump & treat MPVE

Ex-situ Bioremediation

Try before you

buy

12

• Site-specific, assessment of potential risk from site impacts

• Identify hazard (site contamination), identify potential

receptors (humans, environment), assess ways for

exposure to hazard, evaluate risk from exposure

• 4 step process

- CSM review/update

- exposure assessment

- toxicity assessment

- risk characterization and risk based trigger

levels (RBTL)

• Potential for unacceptable risk to commercial site users from LNAPL

impact

• RBTL developed for soil and groundwater to inform future remedial works

• Fate and transport (F&T) modelling showed unlikely negative impact to

Throsby Creek from site impact migration

• QRA incl F&T to be updated post remedial monitoring (if required)

Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) &

Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA)

13

• LNAPL impact identified at depot and

terminal

• Potential for unacceptable risk exists to

commercial site users and intrusive

workers on site from LNAPL

• Remediation required to remove this

unacceptable risk

• Remedial trials identified excavation, ex-

situ bioremediation and re-use as

preferred remedial option

• 12 areas (across depot and terminal)

identified for remediation

• Remediation scope and timing in

accordance with VMP

Remediation Action Plan (RAP)

Ready to

commence Site

Remediation

14

Remediation Works Status

Stage 2 -

Principal Works

• 6,000m3

impacted soil

excavated &

treated

• 10,000m3 treated

soil backfilled in

excavations

• Enhanced

environmental

controls:

• Odour

• Vapour

Stage 1 -

Principal Works

• 7,000m3

impacted soil

excavated &

treated

• 3,000m3 treated

soil backfilled in

excavations

• Environmental

controls:

• Groundwater

• Sediment

• Dust

• Odour

• Vapour

• Air Monitoring

15

Potential for Asbestos in Soils

• WorkCover NSW

notified & removal

permit obtained

• Licensed asbestos

removal contractor

engaged

• Asbestos Removal

Control Plan (ARCP)

prepared to

document safe work

practices for

handling asbestos

during remediation

and disposal

• Historical filling =

potential for

buried asbestos

• Found at low

concentrations in

depot

(uncontrolled fill)

• Found at very low

concentrations

and limited extent

in terminal

Higher standard of care

adopted = all soils managed as potential

asbestos

ARCP protects health of

workers and members of the public

16

Enabling Works – Making a Start

Concrete breaking &

crushing for

backfilling or disposal

Removal & disposal

of redundant

infrastructure

Environmental controls =

negligible dust or pipe spills

17

Excavation & Treatment of Impacted Soil

• Excavation of

impacted soils

• Transfer to stockpile

for treatment

• Soil mixing with

nutrients

• Completed

excavation & soil

validation sampling

Environmental controls = negligible dust

18

Backfilling & Reinstatement

Finished surface

Controlled compaction

Backfilling with

treated soils

Environmental Controls

=

Negligible Dust

19

Environmental Controls: Water Management

(Groundwater Protection)

Product separation

& recovery by

absorbent booms

Product capture &

recovery

absorbent peat

Protection of Throsby Creek &

local users

20

Environmental Controls: Sediment Management

Boundary protection of

storm drains - hay bales and

silt fencing

Protection of internal

storm drains

Protection of Throsby Creek &

Recreational Users

21

Environmental Controls: Dust and Odour

Management

Dust suppression by water

spraying of truck loads

Odour suppressant application to

stockpiles (controls airborne dust too!)

Protection of site workers & local

community

22

Environmental Controls: Dust and Odour

Management

Stockpile covering to

prevent or minimise

dust & odour generation

Protection of site workers & local

community

23

Dedicated Fogger Units

• Odour suppressant spray

mist

• Excavation areas and

boundary locations

Prevent / minimise odour emissions

Environmental Controls: Dust and Odour

Management

24

Environmental Controls - Air Quality Monitoring

• Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC’s)

and odours constantly monitored

• Subjective odour surveys beyond site

boundary in local community

• Asbestos and

VOCs at site

boundary are

monitored

throughout the

working day

25

Stage 2 Remediation Works – What Can

We Do Better to Prevent Odour?

• Odour control ring main along sensitive

boundaries + Met Station

• Enhanced misting effect to prevent

offensive odour

• Apply direct to excavations on digging

• Use in-situ encapsulating agents to

capture vapour

• Apply direct to excavations on digging

• Apply to stockpiles during treatment

Prove to EPA & local

community it works!

Performance Test

26

Community Communications

• Community meetings – share information on remediation activities and

remediation progress, discuss concerns

• Neighbourhood letters – distribute project-related information to a wider

community

• Fact sheet – information on specific issues of interest

• Tighes Hill webpage (in Sep) - keep community abreast of remediation

progress and provide avenue for questions or enquiries

• www.exxonmobil.com.au/tigheshill

• www.mobil.com.au/tigheshill

Questions?