3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

download 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

of 31

Transcript of 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    1/31

    1

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    2/31

    2

    Department of Geology

    Salt rangeField report

    Submitted to:

    Sir Naveed AnjumSir M. Azhar

    Submitted by:

    AHMAD GHANI

    B.S part-2

    University of Peshawar

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    3/31

    3

    Brief

    Contents

    Preface

    Acknowledgments

    To the teachers

    Chapter 1:

    Introduction

    Location

    Accessibility

    Geology

    Chapter 2:

    Introduction to the study Region

    Stratigraphy of the RegionChapter 3:

    Chharat Group

    1.Nammal Formation2. Sakesar Limestone3. Chorgali Formation

    Nilawahan Group

    1. Tobra Formation2. Warchha sandstone3. Sardhai Formation

    Zaluch Group

    1. Amb Formation2. Wargal Limestone3. Chhidru Formation

    The Permo-Triassic Boundry

    Salt Range Formation

    i. Sehwal marl memberii. Bandarkas gypsum member

    iii. Billianwala salt member

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    4/31

    4

    Musakhel Group

    1. Mianwali Formation2. Tredian Formation3. Kingriali Formation

    Surghar Group1. Datta Formation2. Shinawari Formation3. Samana Suk Formation

    K.T Boundry

    Makarwal Group

    1. Hangu Formation2. Lockhart Limestone3. Patala Formation

    Chapter4:

    CREDITS

    REFRENCE

    DEDICATED TO

    To my parents, teachers, fellows

    &

    All the

    DIAMONDS

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    5/31

    5

    PrefaceOur ApproachToday'sstudents are tomorrow's decision-makers, whether their future careers

    are in politics, finance, technology, medicine, geology, or other sciences. It is

    their decisions that collectively will decide the fate of our planet-earth. The

    instructors in Earth science or geology must ensure that their students have the

    opportunity to obtain a basic understanding of the Earth so that they areequipped to make informed, environmentally responsible decisions in theirfuture careers.

    I will definitely say that our teachers/ instructors helped us a lot in

    attaining goals that were selected for we students during salt range (lesser

    Himalayas) held on 8th-11th dec. 2009. I convey the message that understanding

    the Earth is exciting, and that it enriches and heightens our sense of awarenessof the world around us.

    Our field to salt range was to recognize and understand various

    lithologies, structures, fossils, economically important mines in the sedimentarystrata ranging from the Cambrian to recent age of the geologic time scale. If, at

    the end of my report, you urge to have a glance over again, then I will have

    definitely done my best job in preparing this report and achieving the goals

    through the ever best help of my teachers.

    Organization of the reportThis report is divided into four days studies of various formations, groups and

    members of the formations in salt range. The salt range is basically divided into

    three parts naming as eastern salt range, central salt range and western saltrange. All these four days study deals with the lithologies, structures and fossil

    contents of those formations.

    Acknowledgments

    An undertaking such as this one is impossible to complete without the help and

    expertise of many people. The team at the field encouraged and advised me

    every step of the way. Their expertise and cheerfulness kept me motivated and

    ensured that I completed the task at hand and made it a pleasurable experience.My teachers Mr. Naveed anjum and M.Azhar navigated me through many of

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    6/31

    6

    the members, formations and groups of the salt range and also through various

    secrets of writing this report which made substantial improvements to the text

    and artwork. I greatly appreciate the impressive skills of my teachers. I also

    acknowledge the department of geology and university of Peshawar that helped

    a lot in arranging the field for us in such crucial circumstances of ourhomeland.

    To my family who helped me along every step of my life and in

    understanding of my geology life while I was out of the native town in field

    studies and was a constant source of inspiration.

    Abstract:The Salt Range contains the most important geologic andpaleontologic localities in Pakistan, and is one of the outstanding field

    areas in the entire world. Despite its easy accessibility, it has a

    wealth of geological and paleontological features. In fact, it represents anopen book of geology where various richly fossiliferous stratified rocks

    are very well exposed due to lack of vegetation. These include the

    Permian carbonate succession with its outstanding brachiopod fauna,

    Lower Triassic ammonoid beds (the Mianwali Formation, formerlyknown as "Ceratite Beds"), and Lower Tertiary marine strata with age

    diagnostic foraminifera. These rocks also provide an excellent

    opportunity for appreciation of tectonics in the field.

    In addition to the easily available roadside geology,

    some prominent gorges provide fantastic locations to study thesedimentary succession. Older strata are exposed in the eastern Salt

    Range between the Khewra-Choa Saidan Shah and Fort Kussak including

    the famous Khewra Gorge. In the west, beyond Kallar Kahar, are younger

    strata such as in the Nilawahan Gorge at Nurpur, the Nammal Gorge near

    Mianwali, the Chichali Gorge near Kalabagh, and further west theLumshiwal Nala at Makerwal. This succession has been rightly called a

    Field Museum of Geology and Paleontology and can be classified as one

    of the great paleontological areas of the world, fully worthy of

    conservation and protection efforts.

    To the teachersWe live in amazing times. In the past 20 years we have learned an enormous

    amount about our Earth, and new information confronts us almost daily. We

    can scarcely watch the news or read a newspaper without learning of some new

    and exciting discovery related to Earth. This information had come at such a

    bewildering pace, that it was difficult to assimilate it all without the help of ourteachers.

    I convey that during field our teachers gave us excitement of discovery

    while heightening our knowledge, appreciated us, and made us interested in the

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    7/31

    7

    geologic field work and in displaying an appetite for learning more. In the near

    future, we students will make decisions, big and small, that will impact the

    environment on a local, regional, and even global scale. Facing to such

    decisions, I hope that our teachers, in greater way, helped us in making the right

    ones.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    8/31

    8

    INTRODUCTION

    The Indus Basin of Pakistan is divided into two parts i.e. Lower Indus

    Basin and Upper Indus Basin. The Upper Indus Basin is further divided

    by Sargodha high way in to two parts. Towards the east of the Sargodhahighway is Potwar Plateau and towards the west is Kohat Plateau. The

    region of the North Punjab called as Potwar Plateau, is bound in the

    South by Salt range and in North by MBT as shown below.

    Fig. 1. Location of the study area with reference to regional tectonic framework. The Indus River in the

    east Separate Kohat from the Potwar Plateau and the MBT marks its northern extremity.

    The name of Salt range was first use by ELPHISTON in 1808. The name

    is derived from the fact that area contains huge reserve of the common

    table salt.

    Salt range is one of the few most important localities in the Sub-continent

    for its interesting structural, valuable stratigraphic and paleontological

    record. Salt range is characterized by extensive Anticlines folds,

    Synclines folds and various types of Faults. It is also important as a

    source of minerals e.g. Halite, gypsum, Coal, fire clay etc. The

    occurrence of these minerals is important in stratigraphic as well as

    paleontological point of view. Thatswhy Salt range sequence of Pakistan

    has fascinitated Geologist from all over the world due to its wellpreserved faunal assemblages.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    9/31

    9

    The Salt range is mainly divided into two parts. The area to the east of the

    river Indus Main Salt range or Cis-Indus Salt range and the area to

    the west of river Indus is called Trans-Indus Salt range. The main Salt

    range is further divided into three parts:

    Western Salt Range

    Central Salt Range

    Eastern Salt range.

    Eastern Salt range is about 16km and its height about the sea level is

    760m. The western range is widens westward to the width of about 32km

    with highest attitude of 1422m at Sakessar. Similar central Salt range is

    more wider then eastern and western Salt range.

    The Salt range strikes almost East-West and terminates at Kalabaghwhere the range is intersected by river Indus. Beyond the river Indus the

    ranges beaks out into various ranges collectively referred as Trans-Indus

    ranges. The rocks in the Salt ranges are generally folded and are typically

    marked by large and small scale faulting as well as local over-thrusting

    with movements towards south. The sedimentary sequence ranges fromPre-Cambrian to the Eocene and recent age. It is also marked by several

    unconformities.

    In our field visit to the Salt range, we have visited only eastern andwestern Salt range of the main Salt ranges. In the Eastern Salt range, we

    studied the Khewra Gorge, while in the western Salt range we studied the

    Nammal Gorge and Zaluch Nala section. We have studied the

    stratigraphy and detailed litology of the various formation exposed in the

    above said Gorges.

    We also observed some of the very important mineral deposits e.g.

    Khewra Salt mine, Coal deposits, Iron ores etc.

    STRATIGRAPHY OF THE REGION

    The rocks of the Salt ranges stratigraphic units ranges in the age from

    Pre-Cambrian to the Tertiary with the marked absence of Ordovician ,

    Silurian, Devonian and Carboniferous age throughout the region.

    Locally a given stratigraphic rock sequence pinches out laterally to the

    point of vanishing e.g Mesozoic sequence is well developed in the

    western salt range and Trans-Indus ranges but the Triassic and Jurassic

    and perhaps all the cretaceous formations are conspicuously absent in themost of the central and eastern Salt range.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    10/31

    10

    An igneous intrusion of the younger age is also present in the Cambrian

    age rock called as Khewrite or Khewra Trap. Several types of

    unconformities are also present in the area which also includes

    paraconformity, Permotriassic unconformity and Permocambrian

    unconformity.

    We have visited the following three Gorges in the main Salt range

    during our field to that region:

    Khewra Gorge (Eastern Salt range)

    Nammal Gorge (Western Salt range)

    Zaluch Nala (Western Salt range)

    The description and Stratigraphy of the above three Gorges are

    explained as:

    AGE GROUP &FORMATION LITHOLOGY

    Pleistocene and late

    pliocene

    Kalabagh Conglomerates

    (naushahra sandstone and

    conglomerates)

    Brown and gray

    conglomerates with

    sandstone and clay

    interbedsMajor Unconformity

    Pliocene &

    late Miocene

    SIWALIK

    GROUP

    SOAN

    light coloured sandstone &

    conglomerate light red and

    gray clays

    Late Miocene

    Dhok Pathan

    Red-brown clays with gray

    sandstone; conglomeratic

    near Indus

    Nagri

    Greenishgray sandstone

    and clays; Conglomeraticnear Indus

    Middle

    Miocene Chinji

    Bright red clays with

    sandstone

    Early MioceneRawalpindiGROUP

    Kamlial

    Massive red and brown

    sandstones, dark red clays

    Muree

    Massive sandstones, dark

    red and purplish clay-shales;basal conglomerate

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    11/31

    11

    Major Unconformity

    Early

    Eocene

    Chharat

    Group

    Chor Gali

    (Bhadar Beds)

    Olive-green shales with

    bedded Limestones

    Sakesar

    Massive and nodular

    limestones, with marls;chert in upper part

    Nammal

    Light gray calcareous

    shales and limestone

    Paleocene

    Makarwal

    Group

    Patala

    Green shales with coal

    seam in east; thinlimestones

    Lockhart

    (Khairabad)

    Gray, semi-nodular and

    marly limestones

    Hangu

    (dhak pass)

    Impure limestones,

    sandstones, and shales,

    often carbonaceous

    Major UnconformityEarly

    cretaceous Surghar

    group

    Lumshiwal Light-colored sandstones

    with carbonaceous bands

    Early

    cretaceous &late Jurassic

    Chichali

    (belemnite beds)

    Dark green to black

    glauconitic shales andsandstones

    UnconformityMiddle Jurassic

    Baroch

    Group

    Samana suk

    (barochlimestones)

    Gray and purple bedded

    limestones with shaleinterbeds

    EarlyJurassic

    Shinawari Alternating limestone,

    shale and siltstone;sandstone at top

    Data

    (variegated beds)

    Sandstones with

    limestones, carbonaceousshales and lateritic zones

    UnconformityLate

    Triassic

    Musakhel

    Group

    Kingriali

    (kingriali

    dolomite)

    Massive light colored

    dolomite and dolomitic

    limestones, with sandstones

    MiddleTriassic

    Tredian

    (kingrialisandstone)

    Massive gray and purplish

    sandstone, with thincarbonaceous bands

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    12/31

    12

    Early

    Triassic

    Mianwali

    (ceratite beds)

    Olive-green and gray shales

    with thin limestones and

    sandstones

    Paraconformity

    Late

    PermianZaluch

    Group

    Chhidru(Up. Productus)

    Limestone, marl andcalcareous sandstone

    Wargal

    (Middle

    Productus)

    Massive gray limestones;

    occasional thin

    carbonaceous bands

    Amb

    (Lower

    Productus)

    Calcareous sandstone and

    impure limestone;

    carbonaceous shale

    interbeds

    Early

    Permian

    Nilawahan

    Group

    Sardhai(Lavender clays)

    Dark purple and lavenderclays with subordinate

    sandstones

    Warchha

    (Speckled

    sandstones)

    Red and light colored

    sandstones and grits in part

    arkosic; calys interbeds

    Dandot

    (conularia beds)

    Olive-green and gray

    sandstones and shales,

    occasionally carbonaceous

    Tobra

    (talchir

    conglomerates)

    Conglomeratic sandstones

    and shales, boulders mainly

    igneous or metamorphic

    Major Unconformity

    Middle

    &Early(?)

    Cambrian

    Jhelum

    group

    Jhelum

    Group

    Baghanwala( salt

    pseudomorph

    beds)

    Blood-red shales and

    flaggy sandstones; with salt

    pseudomorphsJutana

    (magnesian

    sandstone)

    Massive light-colored

    dolomite and dolomitic

    sandstones; subordinate

    shales

    Kussak(neobolus shales)

    Gray and purplish shalesand glauconitic sandstones;

    pebble-bed at base

    Khewra

    (purple

    sandstones)

    Massive maroon fine-

    textured sandstones;

    maroon shales and flagsbelow

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    13/31

    13

    Eocambrian Salt Range Formation

    Red gypseous marl with

    rocksalt; gypsum-dolomite

    above; occasional oil shale

    Central Salt Range:

    CHHARAT GROUP:

    NAMMAL FORMATION:This formation is the first member of the Cherat group. Cherat

    group represents the Eocene strata of the Salt range.

    HISTORY:Nammal limestone and shale by Gee (1935), Nammal

    Shale by Danilchik and Shah (1967), is named as Nammal formation byStratigraphic committee of Pakistan.

    LITHOLOGY:

    Main lithology of this formation is shale, marl and limestone

    alterations. Shale is gray to green and fossiliferrous. Lime stone is gray to

    bluish, argillaceous and highly fossiliferrous. Marl is light gray to bluish

    gray and is also fossiliferrous.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is shallowmarine to lagoonal environment.

    THICKNESS:

    Thickness of this formation at its type locality is 100m.

    CONTACT:

    The upper contact of this formation is with overlying

    Sakessar formation and is transitional and conformable. The lowercontact of this formation is with underlying Patala formation and this

    contact is also conformable.

    FOSSILS AND AGE:

    Various fossils found in this formation are Foraminifera andmollusks. Due to the presence of these fossils, age assigned to this

    formation is Early Eocene.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    14/31

    14

    SAKESSAR LI MESTONE:This formation is the second member of the Cherat Group.

    HISTORY:

    Sakessar Limestone by Gee in 1935 was accepted by the

    Stratigraphic committee of Pakistan.

    LITHOLOGY:

    Bulk of lithology of this formation is limestone which is cream to

    light gray in color, nodular, and massive in the upper part and also highly

    fossiliferrous. Light gray colored Marl is also found in the top most part

    and having Chert nodules.

    THICKNESS:

    Thickness of this formation in Salt range is from70-150m.

    CONTACT:The upper contact is with Chorgali formation and this contact istransitional and conformable. The lower contact is with Nammalformation and it is also conformable.

    FOSSILS AND AGE:

    Various fossils

    found in this formation are

    Foraminifera, Mollusks

    and Echinoids. Due to the

    presence of these fossils,the age assigned to this

    formation is Early Eocene.

    The last member of Cherat

    group is missing in theNammal gorge. So the

    Sakessar formation is the

    last formation that we have seen in the Nammal gorge.

    CHORGALI FORMATION:This is the 1st member of Cherat Group.

    HISTORY:

    Chorgali beds by Pascoe (1920) has been formalized as Chorgali

    Formation by SCP. This formation also represents the Passage beds ofPinfold (1918) in the Attock area Badhrar beds of Gee and Evans (in

    Davies and Pinfold 1937) in the Salt Range and Lora Formation of

    Latif (1970a) in the Hazara area.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    15/31

    15

    LOCATION & TYPE SECTION:

    The section exposed in the Chorgali Pass (Lat. 3326'30"N :Long. 7241'E) in the Khair-e-Murat Range, has been chosen as the type

    section.

    LITHOLOGY:According to Cheema et al. (1977), the formation is

    composed of shale and limestone.

    In the Khair-e-Murat Range, it is divisible into two distinct units.The lower unit comprises dolomitic limestone and shale. The upper unit

    is composed predominantly of shale with one thick bed of dark grey

    limestone and a bed of nodular argillaceous limestone near the top.

    In Salt Range, the formation is also divisible into two parts. The

    lower part consists of shale and limestone, while the upper part is mainly

    limestone.DISTRIBUTION:

    The formation is distributed in the eastern Salt Range, Kala

    Chitta Range, Khair-e-Murat Range and in the Hazara area.

    THICKNESS:

    It is 150 m thick at Chorgali Pass, 30 m in Tarki, 15m at

    Bahadurkhel and about 45 m in southeastern Hazara.

    CONTACT:

    In the Salt Range, the formation conformably overlies the

    Sakesar Limestone and at other places Margala Hill Limestone.

    In the Salt Range, it is unconformably overlain by the

    Murree Formation, while conformably in other areas by the Kuldana

    Formation.

    FOSSILS:

    A rich fossil assemblage including foraminifers, mollusks

    and ostracodes has been reported by Davies and Pinfold (1937), Eames

    (1952), Gill (1953) and Latif (1970c).

    WESTERN SALT RANGE:

    ZALUCH NALA:

    Zaluch Nala is located in the western Salt range. It is the typelocality of the Zaluch group rocks.

    In this Nala we have studied

    Lei Conglomerate which are Quaternary deposits.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    16/31

    16

    LEI CONGLOMERATE:

    Lei conglomerates are quaternary deposits. The name LeiConglomerates was introduced by Gill in 1952 but it was earlier named

    as Boulder Conglomerate by Pilgrim in 1910.

    This conglomerate consists of poorly sorted pebbles and boulders ofmostly Eocene rocks, with a small proportion of older sedimentary rocks,

    quartzites and igneous rocks. The conglomerate is intercalated with bedsof soft sandstone and siltstone of pale brown to dark brown color.

    This conglomerate is different from the conglomerate of the Tobra

    formation in sense that there are no bedding planes in Lei Conglomerate

    but they are present in Tobra formation.

    Lei conglomerates are known as FANGLOMERATES because theenvironment of deposition of this formation is Fluvial.

    Lei conglomerate

    NILAWAHAN GROUP:These rocks are of Lower Permian age. It includes Tobra

    formation, Dandot formation, Warcha Sand stone and Sardhai formation.

    TOBRA FORMATION:This formation is the first member of the Neela Wahan group.

    Neela Wahan group represent

    the Lower Permian strata of

    the Salt range.

    HISTORY:

    Talchir boulder beds byGee and Talchir stage by

    Pascoe in 1959 was nownamed as Tobra formation by

    stratigraphic committee of

    Pakistan.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    17/31

    17

    LITHOLOGY:

    Main lithology of this formation is conglomerate, sandstone and shale.Conglomerate of this formation is polymictic which means that clasts of

    this formation are derived from various sources. Pink colored Granite

    clasts are very common in these conglomerates which are the part of theNager Parker granite in Sindh. Metamorphic slates are also present in

    this formation. Striations are also present in this formation whichindicates Glacio-Fluvial environment of deposition of this formation.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITIION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is

    Glacio-Fluvial and Fluvial environment.

    THICKNESS:

    Thickness of

    this formation is 20m in typelocality but 133m in the western

    Salt range.

    CONTACT:

    The upper

    contact of this formation is with

    Dandot formation which is

    transitional and conformable.

    The lower contact of this

    formation in Zaluch Nala is with Lei conglomerate which is anunconformable contact.

    FOSSIL AND AGE:

    Various fossils reported from this formation are pollens,

    spores etc. Age assigned to this formation is Lower Permian.

    WARCHHA SANDSTONE:

    This formation is the third member of the Neela Wahangroup. The second member of this group i.e. Dandot formation is missing

    in the Zaluch Nala.

    HISTORY:

    Warcha Group by Noetling (1901) is named as

    Warcha Sandstone by Hussein Ahmed in 1967.

    LITHOLOGY:

    This formation is mostly consisting of Sandstone of redto maroon color which indicates oxidizing conditions. Sandstone is

    medium to coarse grained and mostly thick bedded and massive. Pebblesof granite and quartzite are also present. Carbonaceous shale and coal are

    also present.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    18/31

    18

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation isnon-marine, sub aerial to paludal.

    THICKNESS:

    Thickness of this formation at its type locality is 26-80m.

    CONTACT:

    The upper contact of this formation is with overlying Sardhai

    formation which is conformable. The lower contact of this formation is

    with underlying Dandot formation which is also transitional and

    conformable.

    FOSSIL AND AGE:

    Some plants remains are found in this formation. Age

    aasigned to this formation is Early Permian.

    SARDHAI FORMATION:This formation is the fourth and last member of the

    Neela Wahan group.

    HISTORY:

    Upper part of the Warcha group by Noetling (1901) is named

    as Lavender Clays or Sardhai formation by Gee and Pascoe in1959.

    LITHOLOGY:This formation mainly consists of bluish to greenish

    colored clay, minor gray sandstone and gypsum and calcareous beds in

    the upper part.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is very

    shallow reducing marine to estuarine environment.

    THICKNESS:

    Thickness of this formation at its type locality is 42m

    and in western Salt range its thickness is 65m.CONTACT:

    Upper contact of this formation is with overlying Amb

    formation which is conformable contact. Lower contact of this formation

    is with Warcha Sandstone which is also conformable.

    FOSSIL AND AGE:

    Brachiopods are commonly found in this formation. Age

    assigned to this formation is Early Permian.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    19/31

    19

    Sardhai Clays.

    ZALUCH GROUP:

    AMB FORMATION:It is the first member of Zaluch Group. Zaluch group

    represents the Upper Permian strata of the Salt range.

    HISTORY:

    Amb sandstone beds by Waagen (1891), Amb

    formation by Teichert is now called as Amb formation by SCP.LITHOLOGY:

    This formation consists of thin to medium bedded

    sandstone and limestone. Thin beds of shale are also present. In some

    portion limestone and sandstone are mixed. When limestone is less then

    sandstone, then it is called as Limy sandstone. Limestone is light grey on

    fresh surface and grey to brown on weathered surface. Fractures are also

    present in limestone. Thin layers of organic shale are also present in this

    formation.

    ENVIROMENT OF DEPOSITION:Environment of deposition of this

    formation is Shallow marine to palludal.

    THICKNESS:

    This formation is well developed

    in the western Salt range and thin out east wards.Thickness of this formation is 80m in type locality

    and 47 m in Khisor range.

    CONTACTS:

    Upper contact with Wargallimestone is conformable and the lower contact

    with Sardhai formation is also conformable but

    not present in the Nammal gorge.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    20/31

    20

    FOSSIL AND AGE:

    This formation is highly fossiliferrous. Typical microfossilsare Forms. Most important fossil group is foraminifera. Example of this

    group is fusulina which is macrofossil in this microfossil group.

    Brachiopods are also present. Due to presence of these fossils the ageassigned to this formation is Upper Permian. Monodeoxydiacathonxis

    (rice like fossils) also seen here.

    WARGAL L IMESTONE:It is the second member of the Zaluch group.

    HISTORY:

    Wargal group by Noetling (1901), Middle Productus

    limestone by Waagen (1879), is now called as Wargal limestone bystratigraphic committee of Pakistan.

    LITHOLOGY:

    This formation is consists of limestone and dolomite.

    Limestone is argillaceous, somewhat nodular, thin to medium bedded and

    highly fossiliferous. Dolomite is pinkish grey in color and massive. Blackcolored chert nodules are also present in it. Small scale fault is also

    visible in this formation.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is shallow marine

    shelful, and littoral to super-0tidal environment.

    THICKNESS:

    This formation is well distributed in the Salt range and Khisor

    Range. Its thickness in Zaluch Nala is 182m.

    CONTACT:

    Lower contact with Amb formation is sharp and conformable and

    upper contact with Chidru formation is also transitional and conformable.

    FOSSILS AND AGE:This formation is highly fossiliferous. Various fossils found

    are Brachiopods, Gastropods, Ammonoids, trilobites etc. Index specie

    Productus (brachiopod) is also found abundantly in this formation. Due to

    presence of these fossils age assigned to this formation is Middle

    Permian.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    21/31

    21

    CHH IDRU FORMAITON:This formation is third member of Zaluch group.

    HISTORY:

    Chidru beds by Waagen (1891), Chidru Group by

    Dunbar (1932) is now called as Chidru formation by the stratigraphiccommittee of Pakistan.

    LITHOLOGY:

    Main lithology of this formation included limestone,

    sandstone, and limy sandstone. At the base of the formation, Shale unit of

    grey to dark grey color is also present. The upper most part has well

    marked Sandstone bed, which is the marker horizon and distinguishingcharacter of this formation.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is shallow

    marine, littoral to palludal.

    THICKNESS:

    This formation is well distributed in the western Salt

    ranges and Trans Indus ranges. Its average thickness at the type locality is

    64m.

    CONTACT:

    The lower contact of this formation with Wargal

    limestone is conformable and transitional. The upper contact withMianwali formation is disconformable.

    FOSSILE AND AGE:Various fossils reported from Chidru formation

    are Brachiopods and ammonoites. Due to the presence of these fossils age

    assigned to this formation is Late Permian.

    THE PERMO-TRIASSIC BOUNDARY:(The passage of Marine Permian to Marine Triassic)

    The Permian rocks located in the Salt Range have

    richness of fauna and having relationship with the rocks of Triassic

    system, the strata near the Permo-Triassic boundary are marine and

    having conformable relationship but there is significant break in the fauna

    at the contact.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    22/31

    22

    Kummel and Teichert in 1966 referred to the body as Paraconformity

    showing sub-Arial exposure at the end of the Permian time. In support to

    this view, they thoroughly studied the contact throughout the Salt range to

    find out the lithological and textural changes across the boundary. Their

    work is briefly summarized as under. The upper most lithological unit ofChidru formation is sandstone bed called as white sandstone bed. Thesandstone is fine to medium grained, thinly bedded with interbeds of

    shale while the upper contact with Kathwai member of Mianwali

    formation is dolomite.

    The Permo-Triassic boundary is marked by the following properties:

    There is abrupt change in the lithology at the boundary of the two systemi.e. white sandstone of Upper Permian and dolomite at the base of

    Triassic.

    The upper most sandstone bed shows decrease in faunal contents which

    indicate change in depositional environment during the deposition of

    white sandstone bed. Kathwai member on the other hand also lack fossils,

    indicating shallow intertidal environment.

    The variation in thickness of white sandstone bed indicates time gap

    between Permian and Triassic rocks.

    SALT RANGE FORMATION:It is the oldest and only Pre-Cambrian age formation

    exposed in the Khewra Gorge. It has three members:

    Sehwal marl member:

    This member is further divide into two parts:

    It consists of dull red marl beds with some salt seems. Thick beds of

    Gypsum are also found. Thickness of this part is >40m.It consists of the bright red marl beds with irregular gypsum. KHEWRA

    TRAP is also present in this part. Thickness of this part is 3-100m.

    Bandarkas Gypsum member:

    It is mainly massive gypsum with some salt seems. Minor beds of

    dolomite and clay are also present. Its thickness is >80m.

    Billianwala Salt member:

    It consists of Ferrogenous red marl with thick seems of salt. Its thickness

    is >650m.

    Conjugate fractures are present in all the members.CONTACT:

    Lower contact of the Salt range formation is not exposed but in some oil

    wells crystalline basement rocks are found. The upper contact with the

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    23/31

    23

    Khewra sandstone of Jehlum group is conformable. Thickness of this

    formation is >830m.

    ENVIROMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition is restricted basin condition with high rate of

    evaporation and climate is hot and arid.

    Salt Range Formation.

    KHEWRA TRAP:

    Khewra trap is highly weathered igneous body about 6m

    thick present in the upper member of the Salt rage formation. It is purple

    to green in color. Characteristic feature is that it consists of highly

    decomposed radiating needles of light colored Pyroxene mineral. Its

    origin is crustal thinning due to normal faulting.

    MUSAKHEL GROUP:

    MIANWALI FORMATION:It is the first member of the Musa Khel group. Musa Khel

    group represents the Triassic strata of the Salt range.

    HISTORY:

    Lower part of Mianwali series by Gee (1959), Top most

    limestone and dolomite beds by Waagen (1879) was named as

    Mianwali formation by Kummel in (1969).

    LITHOLOGY:

    This formation is mainly composed of limestone, siltstone,

    dolomite, shale and sandstone. This formation is divided into three

    members:

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    24/31

    24

    Kathwai member:It is the lower most part of the Mianwali formation and

    mainly consist of crystalline dolomite and interbedding of Shale.

    Mitti wala member:

    It is the middle part of the Mianwali formation and consistsof green shale beds with sandstone and limestone interbedded.

    Narmia member:It is the lower most member of the Mianwali formation and

    mainly consists of sandy dolomite, and dark gray to brown color

    limestone. Sandstone interbeds are also found in this part.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is openmarine to deltaic environment.

    THICKNESS:Thickness of this formation is 127m.

    CONTACT:

    The lower contact with Chhidru formation is marked

    by Paraconformity and the upper contact with overlying Tredian

    formation is sharp, well defined and conformable.

    FOSSIL AND AGE:

    The various fossils found in this formation are

    ceratites (cephalopod), brachiopods, and conodonts. Due to the presence

    of these fossils the age assigned to this formation is Lower Triassic.

    TREDIAN FORMATION:It is the second member of the Musa Khel group.

    HISTORY:

    Kingriali Sandstone by Gee (1948),is called as Tredian

    formation by Kummel and Gee in 1966.

    LITHOLOGY:Main lithology of this formation is sandstone, which ismedium to thick bedded and upper part is massive. Few beds of shale,

    siltstone and sandy limestone are also found.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is shallowmarine to deltaic.

    THICKNESS:

    The thickness of this formation in Zaluch Nala is 76m.

    CONTACT:Lower contact with Mianwali formation is sharp, well-

    defined and conformable. The upper contact with Kingriali formation is

    also gradational and conformable.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    25/31

    25

    FOSSIL AND AGE:

    The various fossils found in this formation are plantmicrofossils. Due to the presence of these fossils the age assigned to this

    formation is Middle Triassic.

    Contact between Tredian and Kingrilai Formations

    KINGRIALI FORMATION:It is the third and last member of the Musakhel group.

    HISTORY:

    Kingriali Dolomite by Gee (1943) is named by Gee againin 1945 as Kingriali formation.

    LITHOLOGY:

    The bulk of lithology is dolomite, dolomitic limestone with

    interbeds of dolomitic shale. The dolomite is thin to medium bedded, fine

    grained with inter beds of shale and marl. Cross beds are also present inthis formation.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is shallow

    marine environment.

    THICKNESS:

    The average thickness of this formation is 76-106m.

    CONTACT:

    Lower contact of this formation is with Tredian formation

    and is conformable. Upper contact is with Datta formation of Jurassic age

    and the contact is Disconformity.

    FOSSIL AND AGE:Poorly preserved Brachiopods, Bivalves, and crinoids are

    present in this formation. Age assigned to this formation is Early Triassic.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    26/31

    26

    SURGHAR GROUP:

    DATTA FORMATION:This formation is the first member of the Surgher Group.

    Surgher group represents the Jurassic and Cretaceous strata of the Salt

    Range.

    HISTORY:

    Variegated stages by Gee

    (1945), Lower part of Samana beds by

    Davies (1930) is named as Datta

    formation by Danilchik in1961.

    LITHOLOGY:Variegated beds of

    sandstone, siltstone and shale of different

    colors are present in this formation.

    Sandstone is red to maroon, grey, green and

    white in color. Shale, siltstone and

    mudstone are irregularly distributed. In the upper part thick beds of

    maroon shale are also present. Sulpher is mostly present in this formation

    indicating swamp or deltaic environment.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:Environment of deposition of

    this formation is very shallow marine to

    deltaic and alluvial plains.

    THICKNESS:

    Thickness of formation at its

    type locality is 212m.

    CONTACT:

    Upper contact of this

    formation with overlying Shinawri formationis gradational and conformable. Lower contact

    with underlying Kingriali formation is

    disconformable.

    FOSSIL AND AGE:

    This formation is poorly fossiliferrous but some petrified

    wood is present there. Age assigned to this formation is Jurassic.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    27/31

    27

    SH INAWARI FORMATION:This formation is the second member of the Sur Gher group.

    HISTORY:

    Lowest Samana Beds by Davies (1930), Lower part of

    Kyoto Limestone by cutler (1933), is named as Shinawri formation byFatmi in 1961.

    LITHOLOGY:

    Main lithology of this formation is medium to coarse

    bedded limestone which is of gray to brownish gray color. It is well

    bedded, sandy, oolitic with nodular marl, shale and sandstone. Lime stone

    in the lower part has thick sandstone bed in middle and maroon shale inthe upper part.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    Environment of deposition of this formation is shallow

    marine, deltaic, tidal flats and estuarine environment.

    THICKNESS:

    Thickness of this formation at type locality is 400m.

    CONTACT:

    Upper contact of this formation is with overlying Samana

    Suk formation and is transitional and conformable .Lower contact with

    underlying Datta formation is also Conformable.

    FOSSIL AND AGE:Various fossils found in this formation are Ammonoites,

    Brachiopods and corals. Due to the presence of these fossils age assigned

    to this formation is Middle Jurassic.

    SAMANA SUK FORMATION:This formation is third member of Sur Gher group. Few beds

    of this formation are present in Nammal gorge but it is undifferentiated

    from the Shinawri formation.

    HISTORY:

    Bared limestone by Gee, Upper part of Kyoto limestone

    by Cutler (1933) is named as Samana Suk formation by Davies in 1930.

    LITHOLOGY:

    Main lithology of this formation is medium to thick bedded

    limestone of gray to dark gray color. This limestone is oolitic with shale

    beds with subordinate marl and calcareous shale.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:Environment of deposition this formation is shallow marineshelful to supertidal environment.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    28/31

    28

    THICKNESS:

    Thickness of this formation at type locality is 186m.

    CONTACT:

    Lower contact of this formation with underlying Shinawri

    formation is conformable and upper contact with overlying Chichaliformation is disconformable.

    FOSSIL AND AGE:

    Various fossils found in this formation are Brachiopods,

    bivalves, Gastropods and Crinoids. Due to presence of these fossils age

    assigned to this formation is Middle Jurassic.

    The rest of the three members of Sur Gher group i.e. Chichali formation,

    Lumshiwal formation and Kawagarh formation are absent in along a

    major unconformity Named as K.T Boundary.

    K.T BOUNDARY:(Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary)

    At the end of the Mesozoic era and before the beginning

    of the Cenozoic era, there was a major Disconformity in geologic history.

    If we study the rocks of the Paleocene age, we find a total displacementof almost all the life on earth. The dinosaurs, plants, invertebrates etc. all

    are disappeared. This major Disconformity is seen all over the world. It isrepresented in Pakistan in the form of the laterite bed at the bottom of the

    Hangu formations as we go from Kawagarh formation within Hangu

    formation. In the lower Indus basin, it is represented between the Moro

    group and Ranikot group.

    Scientists all over the world have presented their ideas on

    this matter out of which three are well known.

    Meteorite impact theory:According to this a meteorite stuck the earth near the Gulf

    of Mexico. As a result a huge cloud rose which block the sun rays from

    reaching the earths surface. As a result all living creatures died due to

    their dependence on sunlight as a primary source of energy.

    Volcanic activity:

    According to this theory, during this period repeated

    volcanic activity cause the formation of the huge dust clouds. Eventuallyblocking sunlight and other sources, thus causing the death of the living

    creatures on the earth.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    29/31

    29

    Change in the earths Magnetic field:

    According to this theory, the sudden reversal of the earthsmagnetism distributed the living systems, which could not adjust to the

    new magnetic field and thus resulted in the death of all the living

    organisms.After this event some of the organisms survived. Thus these organisms

    are seen nowadays having different structural features as compared tothese before this event.

    MAKARWAL GROUP:

    HANGU FORMATION:This formation is the first member of the Makarwal group.

    Makarwal group represents the Paleocene strata of the Salt range.

    HISTORY:

    The Hangu Shale and Hangu Sandstone by Davies

    (1930) have been formalized by the stratigraphic committee of Pakistan

    as Hangu formation.

    LITHOLOGY:

    This formation consists of dark grey, rarely variegated

    sandstone, shale, carbonaceous shale, and some nodular argillaceouslimestone. The sandstone is white, light gray, and reddish brown,weathers dark rusty

    brown, fine to coarse

    grained and medium to

    thick bedded.

    THICKNESS:

    In the

    Salt range area this

    formation is 40 to 45mthick.

    CONTACT:

    The upper

    contact of this

    formation is with

    Lockhart formation and this contact is transitional and conformable. Theupper contact of this formation is with Samana Suk formation and this

    contact is unconformable.

    FOSSILS AND AGE:The various fossils found in this formation are foraminifera

    with some corals, gastropods and bivalves. Due to the presence of these

    fossils, the age assigned to this formation is Paleocene.

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    30/31

    30

    LOCKHART FORMATION:This formation is the second member of the Makarwal Group.

    HISTORY:

    Davis (1930) introduced the term Lockhart Limestone for apaleocene limestone unit in the kohat area.

    LITHOLOGY:

    Grey to dark gray, medium to thick massive bedded, brecciated

    limestone. The limestone displays very well developed nodularity. The

    nodularity may be caused by any of the following four reasons.

    Organic activity

    Differential compaction

    Pressure solution

    Stretching

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    The environment of deposition is shallow marine shelf

    conditions where calcite is precipated in warm water to form limestone.

    THICKNESS:

    In the Samana Range the formation is 60 meter thick.

    CONTACT:

    The upper contact with Patala formation is transitional and

    conformable. The lower contact is with Hangu formation and the contactis also conformable.

    FOSSILS AND AGE:

    The limestone contains abundant foraminifers, corals,

    mollucs, Echinoids and algea. On the basis of these fossils the age of the

    formation is assigned as Middle Paleocene.

    PATALA FORMATION:This formation is the third member of Makarwal group.

    HISTORY:

    Davies Pinfold (1937) named it as Patala shale which later

    was renamed as the Patala Formation by the SCP.

    LITHOLOGY:

    Alternate beds of Shale, Clay and limestone. Thin bedded

    sandstone and some interbedded marl and conglomerate are also present.

    ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION:

    The environment of deposition is transitional, continental anddeltaic marine environment.

    THICKNESS:

  • 7/29/2019 3-copy-130818021234-phpapp01

    31/31

    31

    Type locality is in Patala nala located in the salt range area,

    where the thickness of the formation is 90 meters.

    CONTACTS:

    The upper contact with overlying Nammal formation is

    transitional and conformable. The lower contact is with Lockhartformation and it is also transitional and conformable.

    FOSSILS AND AGE:

    The formation is richly fossiliferrous and contains abundant

    foraminifera and mollusks. On the basis of the above mentioned fauna,

    the age assigned to this formation is Late Paleocene.

    CREDITS With the Grace of ALLAH (THE most merciful

    and beneficent ) I have completed my this report of Salt Range Field.

    This all credit goes to my dear Parents, respected Teachers and fellows

    who always remembered me in their prayers, guided me through their

    best and gave me a backup while doing this tough job.I want to thank them all.

    REFRENCE:1.The Geological Survey of Pakistan (volume 22)

    2.Stratigraphy of Pakistanby S.M.Ibrahim Shah

    3.www.brooks/cole.com/geology

    4.www.mcgraw-hill.co.uk/geology

    5.www.gsp.gov.pk/pakistan/index.html6 iki di / l

    http://www.brooks/cole.com/geologyhttp://www.brooks/cole.com/geologyhttp://www.mcgraw-hill.co.uk/geologyhttp://www.mcgraw-hill.co.uk/geologyhttp://www.gsp.gov.pk/pakistan/index.htmlhttp://www.gsp.gov.pk/pakistan/index.htmlhttp://www.wikipedia.com/geologyhttp://www.wikipedia.com/geologyhttp://www.wikipedia.com/geologyhttp://www.gsp.gov.pk/pakistan/index.htmlhttp://www.mcgraw-hill.co.uk/geologyhttp://www.brooks/cole.com/geology