~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

download ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

of 25

Transcript of ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    1/25

    ~~!3 -4 s . + 7 . 4 t 'fl"~ -~ ZA-~T P A ' -

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    2/25

    IF

    1

    COPY NO .

    TOBACCO AND HEALTH-R&D APPROfiC~~

    I

    L

    L

    O

    Presentation to R & D Committee

    by Dr. H. Wakeham

    at meeting held in New York Of fi ce

    on

    November 1'5y 101

    G4

    t

    1 F 1 D

    s , g I

    l A

    x -

    4

    I

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    3/25

    t I

    a

    Partial List of Compounds in Cigarette Smoke

    also Identified as Carcinogens . . . . . . . . . . . . 9Cancer Promoting Agents in Cigarette Smoke . . . . . . . 1 0

    Phenols 'ui Cigarette Smoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 !

    Anti-Carcinogens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2

    I I I . Sznoking and Cardiovasc ular Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    IV . R & D Program Lead ing to a Medically Acce ptable-

    TOBACCO AND HEALTH - R & D APPROACHPaae

    _Chemistry of Cigarette Smoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

    Composition of Mainstream Smoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : 2

    Major Constituents of Mainstream

    Particulate Phase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    Flavor and Irritation Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    The Cancer Controversy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

    Evidence Linking Cancer and Tobacco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    The Problem of Carcinogen Identification . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    Relative Potency of Carcinogens to the Skin

    of Mice ; Comparison of Different Systems

    of Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

    C i g a r e t t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4

    Reduction of Irritating Factors in Smoke . . . . . . . . . . . 1 5

    Controlled Nicotine in Filler and Smoke . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6

    Reduction of Carcinogens in Smoke . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . 1 7

    The Production of Polycyclic Hydrocarbons

    frorn Tobacco vs . Cigarette Paper . . . . . . . . 18

    Polycyclic Hydrocar bons from Tobacco

    Constituents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

    Some Possible Ways to Reduce Carcinog ens

    in Tobacco Srnoke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    4/25

    o more than 4Q0 compound,g of which about 50 have been~I d e n t i f i e d f o r t h e f i r a t t t n , a r , y + t i e r x .,,- . . _ri1111P morris Kesearch Cen!ter .

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    5/25

    ~- _

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    6/25

    4 4 r .

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    7/25

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    8/25

    : THE CANCER CONTROVERSY

    . TUMOR

    Some Definitions

    a malignant growth arising from

    epithelial tissue (sk in, gastric or

    intestinal mucosa, lungs, etc . )

    a malignant growth arising from

    connective or muscle tissues (musc les,

    lymph, etc . )

    d b l o o d v e s s e l s , c a r t i l a g e , b o n e , _ : . '

    a substance which applied to the tissue

    of a test animal gives rise to tu mor _

    formation . I n t e s t s f o r c a r c i n o g e n s I t

    is assumed that tumors u ltimately lead -

    to cancerou s growths and that a_

    carcinogen so demonstrated in test

    animals is dangerous to man .

    P R O M O T ER - a substanc e which by itself does not

    show carcinogenic ac tivity but which

    applied before or c oncurrently with a

    ., c arcinogen enhances the effect of the

    . l a t t e r .

    activity of a carc inogen in a test animal .

    ANTICARCINOGEN- a sub stanc e which Inhib its the norm al -

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    9/25

    S t a t i s t i c a 1 e v i d e n c e t h a t c e r t a i n d i s e a s e s a r e m o r e

    prevalent among smokers than non-smokers .

    P h y s i o 1 o g i c a 1 t e s t s i n w h i c h a n i m a l s t r e a t e d w i t h

    smoke condensates, extracts, or compounds therefrom,

    suffer from increased tumor frequency . Most tests ' .

    involve skin painting or injections on special strains of

    , m i c e . Smoke inhalation experiments . h a v e f a i l e d

    produce lung cancer. , _ . . . . .

    CO 1

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    10/25

    : THE PROBLEM OF CARCiNOGEN IDENTIFTCATION

    Green ste in, Bioche mistry of Cancer - "The carc inog enic. J . P .

    Many fac tors ne ed to be considered in studying carcinogenesis .

    ~

    (a) The dosage, t he nature of th e vehicle, the mode and

    alone but is a function of the following factor s :

    potency of an agent does not reside in the nature o f the agent

    length of t ime of administrat ion of the ag ent ;

    (c) The site of application, the presenc e of c oncomitant ; = :

    test animals ;

    (b) The strain, the species, the sex, and the age of the

    factors s uch as the level of essential dietary c onstituents

    and the number of andmals kept in a caqe . "

    2. One in five of all ran domly per form ed chro nic toxicity tes ts

    reveals the presence of a carcinogen .

    Hartw ell, Survey o f Compounds Which Have Been Tested for

    Ca .rc inoa enic Activity, U . S. Public Health Service - About

    one-ha li 8 of the new ca rcinogens belongs t o five cheinical

    classes as follows :

    C 1 , _ a s s : New Compounds CarcinogensAlipha tic Carba mat es

    Tricyclic Aminofluo ren es 1 4

    Tetracy clic Cyclopent enophe nanthr enes 1 4

    Azo compoun ds 88

    Hete roc yclic Benzacridine 22 .

    CpNFI' O Ej q - n AL

    1 5 '

    1 2

    6

    - 3 6

    1 4

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    11/25

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    12/25

    .

    Araenic .

    Beni. o ( a ) p y r e n e + + + +

    Benzo(e)py rene +

    Beazo(c)py rene + :

    Henz(o) anthraceBe

    ; : 8enzo{YK luoranthene +

    Benzo(b)f luorsnthene ++

    : :Benzene

    p-Benzoquinone `

    n-Butyric acid

    : - B e n z o ( q , h , i ) p e r y l e n e + -

    Chryscne

    C h r om i um

    Cobalt.

    5 , 8 - C y c l o p e n t e n o -

    1 , 2 - b e n z a n t h r a c e n e

    8 , 7 - C y c l o p e n t e n o -

    t . 1 , 2 - b e n z a n t h r a ce n e

    D i b e n z ( a , h ) a n t h r a c e n e + + t

    ,

    l'

    PARTIAL LIST OF COMPOUNDS IN QGARETTE SMO$E_ AL3'J IDENTIFIED AS C ARCINOGENS

    ~ . .. - . . . '~

    > . .

    -

    ti,

    . . ~: . . ' .i . . ~ ~ .' _ . ~ie. . .l '~ . . . - . - .

    I

    I r :

    t~

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    13/25

    f

    ?

    rFb . ' 1 1 0 1 5O L i Q u i d p m r s l f l n l y C i r o c a r b o o s

    Orqanic acid sters

    Fats

    : O~e a t e s_. ' ~hagMY y . _ . 1 A. ~_

    y

    -

    r .

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    14/25

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    15/25

    t

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    16/25

    : .

    .1 1

    .

    I

    . ,

    r

    I 'y

    e

    . t= o N F l D E ~ 1 ~ l A ~ - . . : . ;C

    .

    , ;

    r

    I

    I

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    17/25

    R & D PROGRAM LEADING TO A

    c h e m i s t r y , f l a v o r a n d I r r i t a t i o n s t u d i e s , a n d s e l e c t i v e

    T h i s i n v o l v e s e x t e n s i o n o f c u r r e n t w o r k i n t o b a c c o

    g a s p h a s e f i l t r a t i o n . Cost questimat . e : $ 3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . . :

    MEDICALLY ACCEPTABLE CIGARETTEPresent knowledge and current r esearch indicate three main

    approaches :

    I . : R e d u c t i o n o f I r r i i a i i n q 7 a c t o r s i n S m o k e .

    C o n t r o l l e d N i c o t i n e i n F i l l e r a n d S m o k e .

    s m a l l p i l o t p l a n t a t a y e ) : $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 .

    f i n i s h e d i n 1 8 - 2 4 m o n t h s . Cost questimate (to

    This program is pe. r t i a l l y c o m p l e t e a n d c o u l d b e

    Reduction of the General Level of Carcinogenic 3ubstances

    in Smoke (bui without Complete Elimination of More than a

    Few Specific Co mpounds . )

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    18/25

    *

    PEDrUC'I"!ON OF IRFUTA'~'IN4 FAC'T'4RS IN SMOKS~~r~~~A. This approach ia bssed on the hypotbeaia that

    p h y a i o l o q i c a l i r r , i t a t i o n s a r e a g r a t s t e p I n t h e

    . i n i t i a t i o n o f m o r e s e r i o u s a i l m e n t a .

    :L Development of objecti ve teat for irritatiou .

    _ 2 . I d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f i r r i t a z i n q c o n a t i t u e a t a . . : ' . ~

    . 9 . Selective elimiaation of frritanta from smoke .

    a . B y a e l e c t i v e f i l t r s t i o n o f q z s p h a a e .

    .b . By modificP. t i o n o f c i g a r e t t e c h e m i s t r y

    throuqh;

    ( 1 ) Ad d i t i v e s t o c o n t r o l p y r o l y s i a r e a c t i o n s

    : (2) Selection of fillor blends ~.

    : . . . . . _ . - _ _. ., _ . _ - . . _ : . .C. This program Is closely related to flavor' improvement; ` a a d i n c r e a s e d c o n s u m e r a c c E i ~ t a b i l i t y ; h en c e I t h as a

    d o u b l e a . d v s nt a q e t o p r o d u c t t - t i a , n c e m e n t .

    f

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    19/25

    ~_NTR4LIED NICOT'II1E IN FILLER AND SMOKE

    burley or brights

    d e s i q n a s m a l l p i l o t p l s n t , a p p l i c a b l e t o e i t h e r

    ( r . ) . T o p r o v i d e e n g i n e e r i n g p r o c e s s d a t a u a e f u l

    f o r u p s c c l i n q i f d e s i r e d . . .

    ( b ) T o s e r v e a s a s t a n d b y u n i t s u i t a b l e f o r p r o - _ ~ :

    d u c t i o n o f a m i n o r b r a n d w h i c h c o u l d b e

    -introduced in response to public demand .

    u s e o f l o w - n i c o t i n e t o b a . c c o s w i l l a l s o b e c o n s i d e r e d .

    t

    a c c e p t a b i l i t y , a r e d u c t i o n i n l e v e l m a y b e d e s i r a b l e

    . , E v e n t h o u q h n i c o t i n e I s b e l i e v e d e s s e n t i a l t o c i g a r e t t e

    for medical reasons .

    Pr o b l e m a :

    tobacco :

    . -. -- . . . . , _ . . - - . . .T w o p r o c e a s e s a v a i l a b l e f o r f l a v o r h t l , l o w n i c o t i n e

    How much nicotine reduction will be acceptable

    .low nicotine product of maximum consumer

    I s i t b e t t e r t o e x t r a c t b u r l e y , b r i g h t , o r b o t h f o r

    'to the smok er?

    W h a t t a s t e d i f f e r e n c e w i l l b e t o l e r a t e d ?

    a c c e p t a b i l i t y ?

    Consumer tests are under w ay to answer these questions .

    8 . The MLK extrac tion pr ocess -it is pla nned to '

    I . Th2 Rosentha l process- -now bein g negotiated .

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    20/25

    REDUCTION OF CA.RCINOGENS IN SMOKE

    . T o a c h i e v e t h i s o b j e c t i v e w i l l r e q u i r e a m a j o r

    r e s e a r c h e f f o r t , b e c a u s e

    . C a r c i n o q e n s a r e f o u n d i n p r a c t i c a l l y e v e r y

    class of compounds in smoke .

    T h i s f a c t p r o h i b i t s c o m p l e t e s o l u t i o n o f t h e

    problem by eliminating one or tw o classes

    of compounds .

    T h e b e s t w e c a n h o p e f o r I s t o r e d u c e a

    p a r t i c u l a r l y b a d c l a s s , i . e . , t h e p o l y n u c l e a r -

    hy drocarbons, or phenols. -Pr esent technology does not permit selective

    filtrat ion of part iculate smoke . . ,Flavor substances and carcinoqenic substances

    come from th e same classes, in many inst ances.

    i n t o b a c c o . -Many pYi'olycls products have multiple precuraors

    CONFiDENT1AL

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    21/25

    PRADUCTION OF POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARBONS FROM TOBACCO

    i n c i g a r e t t e a m o k e .

    CONFIDEN-TIM-

    AMOUNTFROM TOBACCO

    VLlues are Srluq CiqareLiea

    2 0 . 5 *

    48 . 0

    5 5 . 0

    4 .0

    0. 5

    C OIdCLUSION : Tobacco is the main source of polynuclear hydrocarbona

    VS. CIGARETTE PAPER

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    22/25

    POLYCYCLIC HYDROCARBONS CONiE FROMMANY TOBACCO~ CONSTITUENTS

    L 2-Benzanthracene

    1 :2-Benzpyrene

    ' 3 :4-Benzpyrene

    Cellulose LS in Pectin,

    9 . 0 3 . 5 1 0 . 7

    1 6 0 8 0 20

    584 8000 2 8 7

    337 5 4 4 539

    2 1 9 33 133

    1 6 4 5 8 1 5 2

    1 3 1 - 29

    . 1 8 6 4 4 2 7 3

    65 22 34 `

    7 8 47 4 5

    4 . 0 1 1 . 0

    56 2 7

    32 7

    1 0 4 3 6 _

    35 66

    94 4 5

    1 1 1

    . 1 1 6 . 4 3

    4 1 1

    1 7 29

    CONCLUSION: Removal of any single precursor will not eliminatepolycyclic hydrocarbons from smoke .

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    23/25

    . t

    W

    T

    SOME PO3SIBLE WAYS TO REDUCECARCINOGENB IN TOBACCO SMOKEDiscover ma jor precursors for carcinogens

    aWor cancer promoters .

    Discover mechsnism or conditions by which

    aarcinoqens are produced and modify those

    c o n d i t i o n s. - . , . .8 e l e c t e x p e ri m e n t a I t o h a . c c o s w h i c h p r o d u c e a .

    minimum of carcinoqens .

    . Add enticarcfnoqens .

    D i s c o v e r d i f f e r e n c e s i n p a r t i c u l a t e f r a c t i o n s

    w h i c h w i l l p e r m i t s e p a r a t i o n o f c a r c i n o q e n s '

    i n s m o ke :.

    GD ~F1D ~~~t~L

    .

    . 2 0

    'S,

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    24/25

    ." ~

  • 8/14/2019 ~~!3 -4 s . +7 .4 t'ZA-~ }~ Fl"`

    25/25