2QH URRP - SNUkj-ph.snu.ac.kr/xml/05627/05627.pdf · y`ox^u\_p xzox\uxyp x]oywuy\p t wuz_]\...

14
Kim et al. KJPH, 52(2):45-58, 2015 DOI:10.17262/KJPH.2015.09.52.2.45 * Corresponding author: Do-yeon Kim (sweetcali@snu ac kr) 45 Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 599 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea 1 2 1 2 3 A Study on Cognitive Function and Awareness of Dementia in the Elderly in Chok Bang (Shabby One-room) Doyeon Kim 1,* , Nayeon Kim 1 , Yongjin Yi 1,2 , Kyeonghyun Oh 1,3 , Juseong Han 1 1 Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Seoul National University 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital 3 The Korean Institute of Tuberculosis Abstract Objectives: The purpose of this study was to Evaluate cognitive function and awareness of dementia in the elderly in Chok Bang(shabby one-room), compared with elderly in apartment, and confirm its correlated factors. Methods: This cross-sectional, comparative study which targeted elderly in Yong-San Gu Chok Bang(shabby one-room) was conducted between June 2014 and August 2014. Those who were 60 years old and more in both Chok Bang(shabby one-room) and apartment were included. Socio-demographic, MMSE and awareness of dementia data were collected. Determinants of cognitive function and awareness of dementia were investigated by using logistic regression analysis. Results: The proportion of declining cognitive function among elderly in Chok Bang was higher than elderly in apartment (31.4% (12.2%-50.6%) vs 8.8% (2.5%-15.1%)), but there was no difference of awareness score (total 15 points) of dementia between two groups. (8.28 points vs 8.34 points, NS) Conclusion: Elderly in Chok Bang show high prevalence of mild cognitive impairment. Correlation between mild cognitive impairment and awareness/LSNS-score/PHQ2-score were not statistically significant. This result may reflect complexity of dementia prevention services. More multi-disciplinary approach to high prevalence were needed. keywords: elderly, cognitive decline, cognitive function, awareness of dementia, Chok Bang (shabby one- room): . 2013 65 12.2% . . . 2008 65 ( , 2008) 8.4% 24.08% . 8 7 10

Transcript of 2QH URRP - SNUkj-ph.snu.ac.kr/xml/05627/05627.pdf · y`ox^u\_p xzox\uxyp x]oywuy\p t wuz_]\...

Kim et al. KJPH, 52(2):45-58, 2015 DOI:10.17262/KJPH.2015.09.52.2.45

* Corresponding author: Do-yeon Kim (sweetcali@snu ac kr) 45Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 599 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea

1 2

1

2

3

A Study on Cognitive Function andAwareness of Dementia in theElderly in Chok Bang (Shabby One-room)

Doyeon Kim1,*, Nayeon Kim1, Yongjin Yi1,2, Kyeonghyun Oh1,3, Juseong Han11Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Seoul National University

2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital3 The Korean Institute of Tuberculosis

AbstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was to Evaluate cognitive function and awareness of dementia in theelderly in Chok Bang(shabby one-room), compared with elderly in apartment, and confirm its correlatedfactors.Methods: This cross-sectional, comparative study which targeted elderly in Yong-San Gu Chok Bang(shabbyone-room) was conducted between June 2014 and August 2014. Those who were 60 years old and more inboth Chok Bang(shabby one-room) and apartment were included. Socio-demographic, MMSE and awarenessof dementia data were collected. Determinants of cognitive function and awareness of dementia wereinvestigated by using logistic regression analysis.Results: The proportion of declining cognitive function among elderly in Chok Bang was higher than elderlyin apartment (31.4% (12.2%-50.6%) vs 8.8% (2.5%-15.1%)), but there was no difference of awareness score(total 15 points) of dementia between two groups. (8.28 points vs 8.34 points, NS)Conclusion: Elderly in Chok Bang show high prevalence of mild cognitive impairment. Correlation betweenmild cognitive impairment and awareness/LSNS-score/PHQ2-score were not statistically significant. Thisresult may reflect complexity of dementia prevention services. More multi-disciplinary approach to highprevalence were needed.keywords: elderly, cognitive decline, cognitive function, awareness of dementia, Chok Bang (shabby one-room):

. 2013

65 12.2%

.

.

. 2008 65

(

, 2008) 8.4%

24.08%

.

8 7 10

A Study on Cognitive Function in the Elderly in Chok Bang

46 The Korean Journal of Public Health

(

, 2013).

, 1

1

8 ,

25% ( ,

2008).

. 2008

65 100

60 , 2012

64.7

.

. (

, 2012)

,

( , , ),

, ,

.

,

,

.

,

,

.

.

.

1.

.

2.

.

3.

.

,

,

,

,

.

.

.

.

, , , ,

5 .

.

,

.

.

.

. ,

,

.

Kim et al. KJPH, 52(2):45-58, 2015

The Korean Journal of Public Health 47

.

( , 2013).

,

,

,

( , 2002). ,

,

2 .

.

, 1

(2008~2014)

, 60

. 2

, ,

,

. 2014

7

5

.

,

2050 65

15.06%

( , 2012).

2008 ( , 2008)

2012 ( , 2012)

, ,

.

,

. ,

( , 2014), ( , 2013),

( 2007), ( , 2014),

( , 2007), ( ,

2012)

.

.

.

60

(Mini mental state examination,

MMSE) ,

, .

,

60

. 2014 6 2014 8

.

(2010)

.

.

8 2745

.

. 3 MMSE

,

,

.

60

A Study on Cognitive Function in the Elderly in Chok Bang

48 The Korean Journal of Public Health

(N) 300 ,

0.35, 0.05, 95%

n=Nz2pq/d2(N-1)+z2pq

162

.

.

.

2012 8 1 [

] 2013

[

]

.

(Korean version of Mini Mental State

Examination for Dementia Screening; MMSE-

DS) ,

5 -10

. 19 ,

, , , ,

. ,

,

.

2008

2012

.

5 , 3 ,

4 ,

3 , 15 ,

. 1 ,

0 .

; , , , ,

, , , , , ,

, , , , ,

, ,

Social Network Scale, Patione Health

Questionnare-2, ,

.

14

,

. short form-IPAQ scoring

protocol , ,

, METs

.

3,000 METs 3

1,500 METs

, 5

600 METs

.

twork Scale ,

12

. 2

Patione

Health Questionnare-2 3

.

,

,

( %) .

.

.

t-test , ,

Chi-square test

.

MMSE

.

.

adjusted odd ratio (aOR) .

MMSE

ANOVA test . p-value

0.05 .

SAS 9.4 version

(SAS Institute) .

Kim et al. KJPH, 52(2):45-58, 2015

The Korean Journal of Public Health 49

n=1 ) (n= 6) n= or 2

e d) ) p v l e

90(54.55) 62(72.09) 28(35.44) 22.31***

75(45.45) 24(27.91) 51(64.56) (<.0001)

73.59(8.47) 69.16(6.92) 78.42(7.32) 8.35***

(<.0001)

0 32(19.39) 29(33.72) 3(3.80)

26(15.76) 18(20.93) 8(10.13)

0 27(16.36) 18(20.93) 9(11.39)

5 36(21.82) 13(15.12) 23(29.11)

0~ 4 24(14.55) 6(6.98) 18(22.278)

20(12.12) 2(2.33) 18(22.79)

( )

6.96(4.76) 6.77(4.59) 7.18(4.97) 0.55

-0.5825

52(31.52) 27(31.40) 25(31.65)

49(29.70) 26(30.23) 23(29.11)

24(14.55) 14(16.28) 10(12.66)

27(16.36) 14(16.28) 13(16.46)

13(7.88) 5(5.81) 8(10.13)

56(35.67) 52(64.20) 4(5.26) 59.35***

101(64.33) 29(35.80) 72(94.74) (<.0001)

117(71.34) 73(85.88) 44(55.70) 18.25***

47(28.66) 12(14.12) 35(44.30) (<.0001)

80(48.48) 20(23.26) 60(75.95) 45.77***

85(51.52) 66(76.74) 19(24.05) (<.0001)

(8), (1), (1), (1) .

* p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<.0001

A Study on Cognitive Function in the Elderly in Chok Bang

50 The Korean Journal of Public Health

)

(8), (1), (1), (1) .

* p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<.0001

= ) (n= ) n=7 r 2

me ) r n ) p v e

91(55.15) 31(36.05) 60(75.95) 33.07***

23(13.94) 12(13.95) 11(13.92) (<.0001)

51(30.91) 43(50.00) 8(10.13)

137(83.03) 66(76.74) 71(89.87) 5.04*

28(16.97) 20(23.26) 8(10.13) -0.0248

126(76.36) 62(72.09) 64(81.01) 1.82

39(23.64) 24(27.91) 15(18.99) -0.1779

136(82.42) 73(84.88) 63(79.75) 0.75

29(17.58) 13(15.12) 16(20.25) -0.3865

153(92.73) 80(93.02) 73(92.41) 0.02

12(7.27) 6(6.98) 6(7.59) -0.8786

154(93.33) 78(90.70) 76(96.20) 2.01

11(6.67) 8(9.30) 3(3.80) -0.1567

131(79.88) 57(67.06) 74(93.67) 18.04***

33(20.12) 28(32.94) 5(6.33) (<.0001)

145(8.41) 74(87.06) 71(89.87) 0.32

19(11.59) 11(12.94) 8(10.13) -0.5736

146(88.48) 72(83.72) 74(93.67) 4.00*

19(11.52) 14(16.28) 5(6.33) -0.0455

103(62.42) 75(87.21) 28(35.44) 47.04***

62(37.58) 11(12.79) 51(64.56) (<.0001)

Kim et al. KJPH, 52(2):45-58, 2015

The Korean Journal of Public Health 51

86 , 79

. 72.09%,

27.91

35.44%, 64.56%

.

73.59

69.16 , 78.42

.

6.77 ,

7.18

.

85.88% ,

14.12% 44%

55.70%

.

76.74%,

24.05% .

,

50%,

10.13% ,

13.95%,

13.92%

.

23.26%, 10.13%

.

.

, , , ,

, ,

,

.

16.28%,

6.33% . LSNS-

6 5.79 , 15.63

,

87.21%,

35.44%

.

31.4%(95% CI

12.2%-50.6%) 8.8%(95% CI

2.5%-15.1%) . 2010

: DB

, 31.1%,

42.1%, 37.2%

9.0%, 2.2%, 5.1%

. ( 2,3)

~ 1057035 0.348 367664 1125201 0.333 375067

5 833242 0.313 260388 978926 1 978926

672894 0.25 168224 893120 0.167 148853

5 410726 0.375 154022 673641 0.2 134728

260126 0.333 86709 606549 0.2 121310

3

0 1057035 0 0 1125201 0 0

5 833242 0.2 166648 978926 0 0

0 672894 0.125 84112 893120 0 0

5 410726 0 0 673641 0 0

0 280744 0.143 40106 681374 0.138 93983

AStudy

onCognitive

Functionin

theElderly

inChok

Bang

4

R

9 % )

u OR

(95 C

Cru R

% )

d OR

(9 C

Cru R

5 )

j R

(9 )

1

4.71 (1.91-11.57)***1

4.11(1.04-16.22)**

1

0.50 (0.23-1.11)

1

1.41(0.42-4.77)

1

0.87 (0.31-2.42)

1

2.69(0.68-0.68)

1

0.71 (0.15-3.42)

1

n/a

5

5

5

1

0.98 (0.32-2.99)

0.50 (0.15-1.70)

0.28 (0.08 0.99)**

0.42 (0.14 1.25)

1

1.62(0.40-6.55)

0.45(0.09-2.18)

0.43(0.09-2.12)

0.93(0.16-5.26)

1

1.21 (0.36-4.09)

0.54 (0.14-2.09)

0.84 (0.21 3.44)

0.63 (0.11 3.73)

1

1.84(0.54-0.54)

0.26(0.06-0.06)

0.58(0.12-0.12)

0.09(0.02-0.02)*

1

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1

0.34 (0.12-0.98)

0.65 (0.20-2.06)

0.43 (0.13-1.45)

1.10 (0.29-4.11)

1

0.21(0.06-0.80)**

0.58(0.13-2.70)

0.25(0.05-1.27)*

1.43(0.24-8.55)

1

0.44 (0.13-1.44)

0.58 (0.15-2.34)

0.58 (0.15-2.34)

0.97 (0.14-6.80)

1

0.19(0.03-0.03)*

0.49(0.13-0.13)

0.31(0.07-0.07)

0.92(0.18-0.18)

1

n/a

0.58 (0.06-5.97)

n/a

1.75 (0.26-11.99)

1

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

1

3.97 (1.67-9.41)***1

2.56(0.82-7.94)*

1

2.14 (0.64-7.15)

1

1.95(0.32-0.32)

1

2.63 (0.53-12.96)

1

5.42(0.30-96.57)

1

2.12 (0.86-5.24)*1

1.74(0.53-5.71)

1

1.65 (0.58-4.67)

1

1.41(0.45-0.45)

1

1.55 (0.16-14.77)

1

n/a

1

1.16 (0.34-3.92)

2.51 (1.11-5.71)**

1

0.51(0.08-3.03)

1.45(0.41-5.03)

1

0.42 (0.08-2.29)

1.13 (0.42-3.00)**

1

0.98(0.08-3.03)

0.25(0.41-5.03)

1

3.11 (0.50-19.54)

2.00 (0.20-20.51)

1

0.37(0.00-27.18)

n/a

1

0.38 (0.17-0.88)**

0.19 (0.05-0.72)***

1

0.31(0.11-0.90)**

0.09(0.02-0.48)**

1

0.32 (0.11-0.93)**

0.12 (0.02-0.66)***

1

0.32(0.10-0.10)

0.04(0.01-0.01)**

1

0.23 (0.04-1.48)

0.30 (0.03-2.98)

1

0.05(0-inf)*

0.00(0.00-1.27)*

p<0.25 * p<0.10 **p<0.05 ***p<0.01

adjusted for area, sex, age, education, living alone, drinking, smoking, exercise, DM, stroke, head injury, LSNS

adjusted for sex, age, education, living alone, drinking, smoking, exercise, DM, stroke, head injury, LSNS

52The

KoreanJournalofPublic

Health

4)

rud

5% C )

A u R

% )

Cru e R

5 )

A u d R

5 )

r OR

5 )

A R

5% )

1

0.92 (0.43-1.96)

1

0.79(0.30-2.06)

1

0.91 (0.37-2.26)

1

0.39(0.11-1.41)

1

1.07 (0.22-5.11)

1

0.46(0.03-7.82)

1

0.49 (0.18-1.37)

1

0.23(0.06-0.84)**

1

0.34 (0.10-1.12) *1

0.11(0.02-0.59)**

1

0.69 (0.08-6.21)

1

n/a

1

1.61 (0.64-4.04)

1

1.97(0.61-6.67)

1

2.12 (0.64-7.06)

1

1.52(0.30~7.81)

1

1.66 (0.29-9.45)

1

2.41(0.05-119.22)

1

0.76 (0.16-3.63)

1

0.81(0.14-4.86)

1

1.10 (0.10-6.41)

1

1.21(0.15~9.9)

1

n/a

1

n/a

1

5.4 (1.54-18.95)**1

7.99(1.33-48.01)**

1

8.14 (1.52-43.55)**1

40.0(7.33-7.33)**

1

n/a

1

n/a

1

2.48 (1.05- 5.83)**1

0.91(0.29-2.85)

1

1.42 (0.54- 3.74)

1

0.89(0.15-0.15)

1

2.83 (0.27- 29.56)

1

n/a

1

0.42 (0.09-1.89)

1

0.14(0.02-1.16)*

1

0.44 (0.09-2.17)

1

0.17(0.01~1.94)

1

n/a

1

n/a

SNS 30

5

1

1.89 (0.82-4.36)

1

0.64(0.18-2.21)

1

0.32 (0.09-1.18)

1

0.17(0.02~1.19)*

1

2.67 (0.55-12.88)

1

2.93(0.19-44.87)

1

1.56 (0.52-4.74)

1

1.24(0.28-5.60)

1

1.45 (0.43-4.93)

1

1.6(0.16~5.9)

1

n/a

1

n/a

p<0.25 * p<0.10 **p<0.05 ***p<0.01

adjusted for area, sex, age, education, living alone, drinking, smoking, exercise, DM, stroke, head injury, LSNS

adjusted for sex, age, education, living alone, drinking, smoking, exercise, DM, stroke, head injury, LSNS

TheKorean

JournalofPublicHealth

53

Kimetal.KJPH

,52(2):45-58,2015

A Study on Cognitive Function in the Elderly in Chok Bang

54 The Korean Journal of Public Health

, ,

.

, 75-79 , , ,

, , ,

,

,

.

, ,

.

. ( 4)

15

, 1

15 ,

. (

, 2008) ,

8.28 , 8.34

( 5).

65

2008

9.3 , ( , 2008)

2012 9.7 . (

, 2012) 5

17.44%, 18.99%

. , 14

93.02%, 91.14%

,

. 6 100

37.21% 22.78%

(p=0.0440). 10,11,14,15

.

)

= )

N

n=7 )

N (%)

lu

me ( D) 8.28 (1.90) 8.34 (2.07) 0.8397

1 41 (47.67) 38 (48.10) 0.9563

2 75 (87.21) 70 (88.61) 0.7834

3 43 (50.00) 47 (59.49) 0.2212

4 ( ) 52 (60.47) 53 (67.09) 0.3769

5 15 (17.44) 15 (18.99) 0.7971

6 100 32 (37.21) 18 (22.78) 0.0440 *

7 33 (38.37) 31 (39.24) 0.9090

8 17 (19.77) 22 (27.85) 0.2223

9 77 (89.53) 73 (92.41) 0.5217

10 68 (79.07) 65 (82.28) 0.6025

11 38 (44.19) 25 (31.65) 0.0977

12 36 (41.86) 36 (45.57) 0.6313

13 74 (86.05) 73 (92.41) 0.1906

14 80 (93.02) 72 (91.14) 0.6536

15 31 (36.05) 21 (26.58) 0.1911

*by t-test, by Chi-square test; * p<.05

Kim et al. KJPH, 52(2):45-58, 2015

The Korean Journal of Public Health 55

, ,

,

.

8.39

, 8.00 .

,

. 7.56

, 7.81 , 8.50 ,

10.21 , 8.60

,

. ,

9.12

7.92 .

8.31 , 8.27

( 6).

18.60%, 32.91%

(p=0.0351).

,

- 53.22%, 39.73%-,

- 14.52%,

26.03% - , ( ),

. ( 7).

)n ( ) R v e

* 62 8.39 (1.94) 3.00-12.00 0.4003

24 8.00 (1.82) 4.00-11.00

6

65

5

29

18

18

13

8

8.90 (1.80) 5.00-12.00 0.0249*

8.67 (1.64) 6.00-12.00

8.06 (1.51) 5.00-10.00

7.62 (2.06) 4.00-12.00

6.75 (2.43) 3.00-11.00

27

26

14

14

5

7.56 (1.85) 3.00-11.00 0.0002**

7.81 (1.52) 5.00-11.00

8.50 (1.79) 5.00-12.00

10.21 (1.19) 8.00-12.00

8.60 (2.61) 6.00-12.00

26 9.12 (1.93) 5.00-12.00 0.0065**

60 7.92 (1.79) 3.00-11.00

16 8.31 (1.78) 4.00-11.00 0.9384

70 8.27 (1.94) 3.00-12.00

*by t-test, by ANOVA; ** p<.01, * p<.05

A Study on Cognitive Function in the Elderly in Chok Bang

56 The Korean Journal of Public Health

7

*by Chi-square test; * p<.05

60

,

.

.

60

8.28 8.34 , 2012 65

9.3 .

32.91% 18.6%

. ,

,

.

,

2008

.

,

Social Network Scale

.

,

.

,

.

,

1

MMSE

.

. 1

) )

N (%) N %)

* 70 (81.40) 53 (67.09) 0.0351*

16 (18.60) 26 (32.91)

33 (53.22) 29 (39.73)

6 (9.68) 4 (5.48)

0 (0.00) 3 (4.11)

3 (4.84) 7 (9.59)

9 (14.52) 19 (26.03)

11 (17.74) 11 (15.07)

Kim et al. KJPH, 52(2):45-58, 2015

The Korean Journal of Public Health 57

. ,

.

e

.

.

,

,

.

,

.

,

.

.

.

1. Chun MY, Validity and Reliability of KoreanVersion of International Physical ActivityQuestionnaire Short Form in the Elderly,Korean J Fam Med, 2012; 33(3):144-151

2. Han JW et al, A normative study of the Mini-Mental State Examination for DementiaScreening (MMSE-DS) and Its Short Form

(SMMSE-DS) in the Korean elderly, J KoreanGeriatr Psychiatry 2010; 14:27-37.

3. Hye-suk Min. Cognitive Function among theElderly and Its Correlated Factors. The Journalof Korean Academic Society of Adult Nursing.2007 ; 19(1) : 78-88

4. Hye Ryoung Kim. Prevalence and Risk factorsof Depression in Women Elderly Living alonein Korea. Journal of Safety and CrisisManagement. 2014 ; 10(2) : 307-326

5. Hyo-jin Kim. Life of the Split-Room Village inYeongdeungpo and the Function as a Space forthe Urban Poor. Hanyang University. 2009

6. Jae-Hyun Shin et al. The Standardization of theKorean Version of the Patient Health

7. Jung-Ah Park, Young-Chae Cho. Comparisonof Depression and Cognitive Function betweenElderly Welfare Recipients and Non-ElderlyWelfare Recipients in a Public Health Center.Journal of agricultural medicine andcommunity health , 2007 ; 32(1) : 1-12

8. Kim Min-Jin ,Jo Hyun-Mi. Living Status ofJjok-bang (small single room) RegionResidents and Reproduction of Poverty.Discourse and policy in social science. 2013;3(2):183-205.

9. Kim, T. H., Jhoo, J. H., Park, J. H., Kim, J. L.,Ryu, S. H., Moon, S. W., et al. Korean versionof mini mental status examination for dementiascreening and its short form, PsychiatryInvestigation2010; 7:102-108.

10. Kwang-Hi Park,Hye-Soon Kim , Yeo-Jin Yi.Comparison of Risk Factors in CognitiveImpairment between Non-depressive Elderlyand Depressive Elderly. The Journal ofthe Korea Contents Association. 2013 ; 13(7) :301-310

11. Kyung Woo Lee, MD. The Validity andReliability of Korean Version of Lubben SocialNetwork Scale, Korean J Fam Med, 2009;30:352-358

A Study on Cognitive Function in the Elderly in Chok Bang

58 The Korean Journal of Public Health

12. ML Booth et al, International physical activityquestionnaire: 12-country reliability andvalidity, Medicine & Science in Sports &Exercise, 2003; 195:3508-1381

13. Questionnaire-2, J Korean Neuro Assoc,2013;52:115-121

14. Reinert, Duane F. et al, The alcohol usedisorders identification test: an update ofresearch findings, Alcoholism: Clinical andExperimental Research, 2007; 31(2):185-199.

15. Sang-kyu et al. Park.Gender Differences inCognitive Impairment related to the Elderly.The Journal of Korea Society for Wellness.2012 ; 7(3) : 85-95

16. Study for assessment of health status and policydevelopment of health promotion amonghomeless . Ministry of health and welfare. 2012

17. Young-Sook Kwon. Factors associated withCognitive Decline in the Elderly in Community.The Society of Digital Policy & Management.2014 ; 12(2) :587-594

18. .. 2012

19. . .2008

20. . 2013. 2013