F/SOP FYDP/09/00 Final Year Design Project (FYDP) Report ...
2a-c) Program Description & Organization NSS-03-01 SMC/XR Template KDP B Phase A Concept Development...
3
C onceptD evelopm ent Logic D iagram R equired InputP riorto Initiation 1. Com pleted A nalysis ofA lternatives 2. System CONOPS 3. Funding 4. TRL 4 orhigherforallsubsystem s 5. A pproved U ser R equirem ents PE O E xecution 1 M aterialS olution 3-10 D etailed S olutions S ole Source Multiple Source (prefered) Issue R FP A lpha C ontracting R isk ID & Mitigation Plan Source Selection Planning and E xecution Establish M etrics,Specs and testcriteria Tailored System Engineering Plan (SEP ) E xecute C ontract C ontract Aw ard D raft System Spec Technical P erform ance M easurem ent (TPM ) Prototype C reation Initial B aseline R eview (IB R) EVM S,IM S reporting SRR TR L 5 R evise Metrics, S pecs and test criteria U pdated S EP for targetdem o M od C ontract D own S elect C ontractor to <= 3 A pproved System Spec TPM (TR L 6) Prototype C reation IBR EVM S,IM S reporting System Functionality R eview (SFR ) Functional B aseline K D P B required A ctivities (IPA ,C A RD,Etc) KDP B R eady Meets C ost, Schedule and P erform ance Targets C ontract M od Does notm eet targets Yes D raft Functional B aseline KDP B KDP R equired D ocum ents (C D D ,TEM P,etc) C onceptStudies M ultiple MaterialS olutions TR L 4 H ardware A ctivities R equirem ents R efinem ent C O N O P S,IC D ,D O TM LPF, A rchitecture Conduct AOA AOA results M aterial Solution KDP A required A ctivities (see reverse) KDP A R eady Yes D raftA nalysis ofA lternative (AO A )Plan KDP A A pproval A cq S trategy KDP R equired Docum ents (IC D,T&E S trategy, etc) No C onceptD ecision A cq Strategy to m ature technology 2a-c) Program Description & Organization NSS-03-01 SMC/XR Template KDP B Phase A Concept Development Pre KDP-A Concept Studies Full Funding in FYDP KDP A SMC April 2008; rev19 JCIDS process, architecting process, and operators/using entities develop JCIDS products (e.g., Initial Capabilities Development Document (CDD), Joint Operation Concepts, etc.) with support from space acquisition organizations as requested. Once it is clear that a space system needs to be acquired, J8 will notify DoD Space MDA. Includes concept studies, assessments and requirements (e.g., technology development, Capability Development Document). During this phase, baseline development is mature enough to enter the formal acquisition process. Program Management Affordability Assessment POE CCA IC E CARD (Designated Programs) Technical Systems Engineering Test & Evaluation Supportability ICD •Program Structure •Acquisition Approach •Capability Needs •Corrosion Prevention •Data Management •Life Cycle Sustainment •T&E Considerations •Risk Management •Resource Management •Systems Engineering •Information Technology •Interoperability •Research & Tech Protection •Information Assurance •Product Support •Human Systems Integration •ESOH •MOSA •Business Considerations •Best Practices •Relief, Exemptions & Waivers NSS Decision Support Systems Effective Interaction is Essential Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System VCJCS Oversight CJCSI 3170.01F National Security Space Acquisition Process NSS-03-01 Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution DEPSECDEF Oversight DoD 7000.14-R 18) ADM 9) Risk Management & Probability of Program Success Assessment 11-14) High Level Document Approvals 4a-c) Requirements 2f-j-8-16) Prog Estimate/Executability & Cost Drivers 2d) Technologies/Studies Accomplished Mature Acquisition Strategy 5) SEP 1) MDA Approved Acquisition Strategy 2a-d) Program Description, Organization & Progress 2f-j) Detailed Budget Information 3) Exit/Entry Criteria Analysis/Review 4) Requirements & Architecture Summary 5) SEP 7-8) Cost Drivers & Trades 9) Detailed Risk Management & Probability of Program Success Assessment 10) Support Issues 11-15) High-Level Document Approvals 16) Program Estimate, POM, CARD 17) IMS 18) ADM/APB Key PM Topic Areas for KDP Preparation (Details on back side of chart) Usage Note: This flow chart has been modified using information from NSS03-01, DoD 5000 and other applicable documentation for use by SMC/XR as a training aid/template (including some draft documentation) It has been tailored for that organizations use and other organizations may follow a different/modified version of what is presented here Concept Characterization Key Activities Flow Diagrams Describing Major Activities and their relationships Solution Identification # of options reduced from 1000 + Pre KDP A to final solution by KDP B Objectives: Develop & document a systems engineering process for developing pre-AoA materiel solutions Validate the process using a case study with a stated capability shortfall & document the results Deliverables: Systems Engineering Plan specifically tailored for pre-AoA material concepts Characterization & technical data of the materiel solutions developed for the stated capability shortfall Objectives: Plan and Conduct an AoA to determine preferred materiel solution Match User Requirements to available technology Deliverables: Analysis of Alternatives Report KDP A required documentation Objectives: Mature Technologies to TRL 6 Develop a firm, cost effective program baseline meeting user requirements Deliverables: Approved System Specification and Function Baseline (Note: Key NSS 03-01 requirement that differs from DoD 5000) KDP B required documentation (see reverse side) Planning must allow time and schedule for iterative technology development – Maturing technology may not achieve SRR or SFR criteria on first attempt Concept Decision Meeting Develop Component Solutions, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies, Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Interpret User Needs, Analyze Operational Capability Shortfalls & Environmental Constraints Develop Capability Tradespace& Constraints & Verification Objectives Decompose Capability Tradespaceinto Solution Sets & Verification Objectives Decompose Capability Solution Sets into Component Solutions & Assessment Objectives Assess/Analyze Capability & Verify Tradespace Performance Assess/Analyze Enabling/Critical Component Solutions Versus Shortfalls Assess/Analyze Solution Sets Versus Functional Performance Analyze/Assess Capability Versus Defined User Needs & Environmental Constraints Trades Trades INPUTS OUTPUTS CRA Service/JROC Validation & Approval ASR Analyze/Assess Concepts Versus Defined User Needs & Environmental Constraints Develop Concept Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Verification Objectives Decompose Concept Performance into Functional Definition & Verification Objectives Assess/Analyze System Concept Versus Functional Capabilities Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts & Assessment Objectives Develop Component Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies, Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Assess/Analyze Enabling/Critical Components Versus Capabilities Trades Assess/Analyze Concept & Verify System Concept’s Performance ITR Trades OUTPUTS •Analysis of Alternatives •System-Level CONOPS •Acquisition Strategy •Initial CDD •OV Arch Products •IPS •T&E Strategy •ICD •AoA Plan •Exit Criteria INPUTS Interpret User Needs, Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Interpret User Needs. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Develop System Perf (& Constraints) Spec & Enabling/Critical Tech Verification Plan Develop Functional Definitions for Enabling/ Critical Technologies & Associated Verification Plan Decompose Functional Definitions into Critical Component Definition & Tech Verification Plan Trades • ICD & Draft CDD • Preferred Sys Concept • Exit Criteria • T&E Strategy • Support & Maintenance Concepts & Technologies •AoA •SEP • Sys Performance Spec •TEMP • Validated Sys Support & Maintenance Objectives & Requirements • SEP •PESHE • PPP • TRA • Inputs to: - IBR - ISP -STA - CDD - Acq Strategy - Affordability Assessment - Cost/Manpower Est. Trades INPUTS OUTPUTS Demo & Validate Sys Concepts & Technology Maturity Versus Defined User Needs Demo System Functionality Versus Plan Demo Enabling/ Critical Technology Components Versus Plan Develop System Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies, Update Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Demo/Model Integrated System Versus Performance Spec ConSEP Concept Characterization & Technical Description Inputs into: Plan draft ICD Preliminary Integrated Architecture Demo Plan • • • - - - - AoA • Capability Shortfall • Proposed Materiel Solution Characterized Concept Preferred System Concept Tech Demonstrations & Prototypes Implementable Prgm Baseline AOA SRR ICD Service/JROC Validation & Approval Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) KPPs CDD Service/JROC Validation & Approval Exit Criteria Met APB DSAB MDA Exit Criteria ADM SFR Key Management Considerations Phase 1: Tech Maturation Phase 2: System Maturation Exit Criteria Met DSAB Exit Criteria MDA ADM C oncept Technology Forecast Long Term Threat A nalysis S olution S ets C onstraints Cost Perform ance Schedule Likely Technology A pplications D oD Influence Marketplace influence Projected Im provem ents Possible Growth Paths PotentialA dvisaries Im provem ents in C urrentSystem s Future W arfighting Strategy Impacton C urrentSystem s ADM – A cquisition D ecision M em orandum AoA – A nalysis ofA lternatives APB – A cquisition Program B aseline CD – C onceptD ecision D AB – D efense A cquisition B oard DSAB – D efense Space A cquisition B oard ESO H – Environm ent,Safety & O ccupational H ealth EVM – Earned Value M anagem ent IB R – Integrated B aseline R eview ITA B – Inform ation Technology A cquisition B oard M DA – M ilestone D ecision A uthority M O SA – M odularO pen System s A pproach PSR – Program SupportR eview T&E – Testand E valuation TLCSM – TotalLife C ycle S ystem s M anagem ent O versight& R eview A cronym s C ostA cronym s CARD – C ostA nalysis R equirem ents D escription CC A – C om ponentCostAssessm ent IC E – IndependentC ostEstim ate PO E – P rogram O ffice Estim ate PM O – P rogram M anagem entOffice RDT&E – R esearch,D evelopm ent,Test& Evaluation Technical& Logistics A cronym s ASR – A lternative S ystem s R eview CDD – C apability D evelopm entDocum ent C I– C onfiguration Item CRA – XXXXXXXX DOTM LPF – D octrine,O rganization,Training M anpow er,Leadership,Personnel and Facilities DT&E – D evelopm entalTest& Evaluation ESO H – Environm ental,Safety & O ccupationalH ealth IC D – InitialC apabilities D ocum ent IP A – IndependentProgram A ssessm ent IPS – IndependentProgram Sum m ary ISR – In-Service R eview ISP – Inform ation SupportPlan ITR – InitialTechnicalR eview JR O C – JointR equirem ents O versightC ouncil KDP – K ey D ecision Point KPP – K ey Perform ance Param eter PESHE – Program m atic Environm ent,Safety & O ccupation H ealth Evaluation PPP – Program Protection Plan RM S – R eliability,M aintainability & Supportability SEP – System s Engineering Plan SFR – System FunctionalR eview SRR – S ystem R equirem ents R eview STA – System ThreatA ssessm ent SVR – S ystem Verification R eview T&E – Test& Evaluation TEM P – Test& Evaluation M asterPlan TDS – Technology D evelopm entStrategy TRA – Technology R eadiness A ssessm ent
-
Upload
hollie-baldwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
1
Transcript of 2a-c) Program Description & Organization NSS-03-01 SMC/XR Template KDP B Phase A Concept Development...
Concept Development Logic Diagram
Required Input Prior to Initiation1. Completed Analysis of Alternatives2. System CONOPS3. Funding4. TRL 4 or higher for all subsystems 5. Approved User Requirements
PEO Execution 1 Material Solution
3-10 Detailed Solutions
Sole Source
Multiple Source (prefered)
Issue RFPAlpha Contracting
Risk ID & Mitigation Plan
Source Selection Planning and
Execution
Establish Metrics, Specs and test criteria
Tailored System Engineering Plan (SEP)
Execute Contract
Contract Award
Draft System
Spec
Technical Performance Measurement
(TPM)
Prototype Creation
Initial Baseline Review (IBR)
EVMS, IMS reporting
SRRTRL 5
Revise Metrics, Specs and test
criteria
Updated SEP for target demo
Mod Contract Down Select Contractor to
<= 3
Approved System
Spec
TPM(TRL 6)
Prototype CreationIBR
EVMS, IMS reporting
System Functionality Review (SFR)
Functional Baseline
KDP B required Activities
(IPA, CARD, Etc)
KDP B Ready
Meets Cost, Schedule and Performance
Targets
Contract Mod
Does not meet targets
YesDraft
Functional Baseline
KDP B
KDP Required Documents
(CDD, TEMP, etc)
Concept StudiesMultiple Material SolutionsTRL 4 Hardware Activities
Requirements RefinementCONOPS, ICD, DOTMLPF,
Architecture
Conduct AOA
AOA results Material Solution
KDP A required Activities
(see reverse)
KDP A Ready Yes
Draft Analysis of Alternative
(AOA) Plan
KDP AApproval
Acq Strategy
KDP Required
Documents(ICD, T&E Strategy,
etc)
No
Concept DecisionAcq Strategy to
mature technology
2a-c) Program Description
& Organization
NSS-03-01 SMC/XR Template
KDP B
Phase AConcept Development
Pre KDP-AConcept Studies
FullFunding in
FYDP
KDP A
SMC April 2008; rev19
JCIDS process, architecting process, and operators/using entities develop JCIDS products (e.g., Initial Capabilities Development Document (CDD), Joint Operation Concepts, etc.) with support
from space acquisition organizations as requested. Once it is clear that a space system needs to be acquired, J8 will notify DoD Space
MDA.
Includes concept studies, assessments and requirements (e.g., technology
development, Capability Development Document). During this phase, baseline development is mature enough to enter
the formal acquisition process.
Program Management
AffordabilityAssessmentPOE CCA ICE
CARD(Designated Programs)
TechnicalSystems EngineeringTest & EvaluationSupportability
ICD
•Program Structure•Acquisition Approach•Capability Needs•Corrosion Prevention•Data Management•Life Cycle Sustainment•T&E Considerations•Risk Management•Resource Management•Systems Engineering•Information Technology
•Interoperability•Research & Tech Protection•Information Assurance•Product Support•Human Systems Integration•ESOH•MOSA•Business Considerations•Best Practices•Relief, Exemptions & Waivers
NSS Decision Support SystemsEffective Interaction is Essential
Joint CapabilitiesIntegration &
Development SystemVCJCS OversightCJCSI 3170.01F
National Security Space Acquisition
ProcessNSS-03-01
Planning,Programming,
Budgeting & ExecutionDEPSECDEF Oversight
DoD 7000.14-R
18) ADM
9) Risk Management & Probability of Program Success Assessment
11-14) High Level Document Approvals
4a-c) Requirements
2f-j-8-16) Prog Estimate/Executability& Cost Drivers
2d) Technologies/StudiesAccomplished
MatureAcquisition Strategy
5) SEP
1) MDA ApprovedAcquisition Strategy
2a-d) Program Description, Organization & Progress
2f-j) Detailed BudgetInformation
3) Exit/Entry Criteria Analysis/Review
4) Requirements& Architecture Summary
5) SEP
7-8) Cost Drivers & Trades
9) Detailed Risk Management & Probability of Program Success Assessment
10) SupportIssues
11-15) High-LevelDocument Approvals
16) Program Estimate,POM, CARD17) IMS
18) ADM/APB
Key PM Topic Areas for KDP Preparation(Details on back side of chart)
Usage Note: This flow chart has been modified using information from NSS03-01, DoD 5000 and other applicable documentation for use by SMC/XR as a training aid/template (including some draft documentation) It has been tailored for that organizations use and other organizations may follow a different/modified version of what is presented here
Concept Characterization
Key ActivitiesFlow Diagrams Describing Major Activities and their relationships
Solution Identification# of options reduced from 1000 + Pre KDP A to final solution by KDP B
Objectives:Develop & document a systems engineering process for developing pre-AoA materiel solutionsValidate the process using a case study with a stated capability shortfall & document the results
Deliverables:Systems Engineering Plan specifically tailored for pre-AoA material conceptsCharacterization & technical data of the materiel solutions developed for the stated capability shortfall
Objectives:Plan and Conduct an AoA to determine preferred materiel solutionMatch User Requirements to available technology
Deliverables:Analysis of Alternatives ReportKDP A required documentation
Objectives:Mature Technologies to TRL 6Develop a firm, cost effective program baseline meeting user requirements
Deliverables:Approved System Specification and Function Baseline (Note: Key NSS 03-01 requirement that differs from DoD 5000) KDP B required documentation (see reverse side)Planning must allow time and schedule for iterative technology development – Maturing technology may not achieve SRR or SFR criteria on first attempt
ConceptDecisionMeeting
Develop Component Solutions,i.e., Enabling/Critical
Technologies, Constraints& Cost/Risk Drivers
Interpret User Needs,Analyze Operational
Capability Shortfalls &Environmental Constraints
Develop CapabilityTradespace & Constraints
& VerificationObjectives
Decompose CapabilityTradespace into
Solution Sets &Verification Objectives
Decompose CapabilitySolution Sets into
Component Solutions &Assessment Objectives
Assess/AnalyzeCapability & Verify
Tradespace Performance
Assess/AnalyzeEnabling/Critical
Component SolutionsVersus Shortfalls
Assess/AnalyzeSolution Sets Versus
Functional Performance
Analyze/AssessCapability Versus
Defined User Needs &Environmental Constraints
Trades Trades
INPUTS OUTPUTS
CRA
Service/JROCValidation &
Approval
ASR
Analyze/Assess Concepts Versus
Defined User Needs &Environmental Constraints
Develop Concept Performance (& Constraints)
Definition & VerificationObjectives
Decompose ConceptPerformance into
Functional Definition &Verification Objectives
Assess/AnalyzeSystem Concept
Versus FunctionalCapabilities
Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts &Assessment Objectives
Develop Component Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical
Technologies, Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers
Assess/AnalyzeEnabling/Critical
Components VersusCapabilities
Trades
Assess/AnalyzeConcept & Verify System Concept’s
Performance
ITR
Trades
OUTPUTS
•Analysis of Alternatives•System-Level CONOPS•Acquisition Strategy•Initial CDD•OV Arch Products•IPS•T&E Strategy
•ICD•AoA Plan•Exit Criteria
INPUTS
Interpret User Needs,Analyze Operational
Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Interpret User Needs.
Analyze Operational Capabilities &
Environmental Constraints
Develop System Perf(& Constraints) Spec &Enabling/Critical Tech
Verification Plan
Develop FunctionalDefinitions for Enabling/Critical Technologies &
Associated Verification Plan
Decompose FunctionalDefinitions into CriticalComponent Definition
& Tech Verification Plan
Trades
•ICD & Draft CDD•Preferred Sys Concept•Exit Criteria •T&E Strategy•Support & Maintenance
Concepts & Technologies•AoA•SEP
•Sys Performance Spec•TEMP•Validated Sys Support &Maintenance Objectives & Requirements
•SEP •PESHE •PPP •TRA• Inputs to:
- IBR - ISP -STA -CDD- Acq Strategy- Affordability Assessment- Cost/Manpower Est.
Trades
INPUTS OUTPUTS
Demo & Validate SysConcepts & Technology
Maturity VersusDefined User Needs
Demo SystemFunctionalityVersus Plan
Demo Enabling/Critical Technology
ComponentsVersus Plan
Develop System Concepts,i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies,
Update Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers
Demo/ModelIntegrated System Versus
Performance Spec
ConSEPConcept Characterization & Technical DescriptionInputs into:
Plandraft ICDPreliminary Integrated ArchitectureDemo Plan
••
•---
-
AoA
• Capability Shortfall• Proposed Materiel Solution
CharacterizedConcept
Preferred SystemConcept
Tech Demonstrations & Prototypes
Implementable Prgm Baseline
AOA SRR
ICD
Service/JROCValidation &
ApprovalClinger-Cohen Act- Compliance (all IT)- Certification (MAIS)
KPPs CDD
Service/JROCValidation &
Approval
ExitCriteria
MetAPB DSAB MDA
Exit Criteria
ADM
SFR
Key Management Considerations
Phase 1: Tech Maturation Phase 2: System Maturation
ExitCriteria
MetDSAB
Exit Criteria
MDA ADM
Concept
Technology Forecast
Long Term Threat Analysis
Solution Sets Constraints
Cost
Performance
Schedule
Likely Technology Applications
DoD Influence
Marketplace influence
Projected Improvements
Possible Growth Paths
Potential Advisaries
Improvements in Current Systems
Future Warfighting StrategyImpact on Current Systems
ADM – Acquisition Decision MemorandumAoA – Analysis of AlternativesAPB – Acquisition Program BaselineCD – Concept DecisionDAB – Defense Acquisition BoardDSAB – Defense Space Acquisition BoardESOH – Environment, Safety & Occupational
HealthEVM – Earned Value Management
IBR – Integrated Baseline ReviewITAB – Information Technology Acquisition
BoardMDA – Milestone Decision AuthorityMOSA – Modular Open Systems ApproachPSR – Program Support ReviewT&E – Test and EvaluationTLCSM – Total Life Cycle Systems Management
Oversight & Review Acronyms
Cost Acronyms
CARD – Cost Analysis Requirements DescriptionCCA – Component Cost AssessmentICE – Independent Cost Estimate
POE – Program Office EstimatePMO – Program Management OfficeRDT&E – Research, Development, Test & Evaluation
Technical & Logistics Acronyms
ASR – Alternative Systems ReviewCDD – Capability Development DocumentCI – Configuration ItemCRA – XXXXXXXXDOTMLPF – Doctrine, Organization, Training
Manpower, Leadership, Personneland Facilities
DT&E – Developmental Test & EvaluationESOH – Environmental, Safety & Occupational HealthICD – Initial Capabilities DocumentIPA – Independent Program AssessmentIPS – Independent Program SummaryISR – In-Service ReviewISP – Information Support PlanITR – Initial Technical ReviewJROC – Joint Requirements Oversight Council
KDP – Key Decision PointKPP – Key Performance ParameterPESHE – Programmatic Environment, Safety
& Occupation Health EvaluationPPP – Program Protection PlanRMS – Reliability, Maintainability &
SupportabilitySEP – Systems Engineering PlanSFR – System Functional ReviewSRR – System Requirements ReviewSTA – System Threat AssessmentSVR – System Verification ReviewT&E – Test & EvaluationTEMP – Test & Evaluation Master PlanTDS – Technology Development StrategyTRA – Technology Readiness Assessment
9 Guiding Principles of Space Acquisition- Mission Success- Accountability- Streamlined / Agile- Inclusive- Flexible- Stable- Disciplined- Credible- Cost Realism
DSAB Process Notional Flow Diagram
DSAB Planning Meeting
ICAT does cost analysis SPO/PM compiles IPS
DSAB Planning Meeting
DSAB
DSAB Process Notional Flow Diagram
DSAB Planning Meeting
ICAT does cost analysis SPO/PM compiles IPS
DSAB Planning Meeting
DSAB
