23 Article

download 23 Article

of 23

Transcript of 23 Article

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    1/23

    23 Table 9Parameter Estimates for the Bivariate EGARCH Model with Dynamic CorrelationChina EquityMarket Returns and WTI PricesChina WTIMean equation

    j,0

    0.0018 (1.72)oil,0

    0.0022 (1.31)

    j,1

    -0.0337 (-1.61)j,2

    0.0082 (0.41)oil,2

    -0.0491 (-1.60)Variance equation

    j,0

    -0.2675 (-2.66)oil,0

    -0.4420 (-2.32)

    j,1

    0.2151 (2.94)oil,1

    -0.0860 (-1.42)

    j,2

    0.0068 (0.05)oil,2

    0.0991 (1.73)

    j

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    2/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    3/23

    Positive size bias test0.316 0.118

    Joint test0.496 0.680z represents the standardised residual for the corresponding equation i.e. either

    country index return or regionalor world index return. z

    1.z2

    indicate product of the two standardised residuals.

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    4/23

    24Figure 1: Time Varying Conditional Correlation between Brazil EquityReturns and Oil

    Price ReturnsJan 1995Feb 2007

    -0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.100.10.20.30.40.5

    2 5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 5 2 5 / 0 1/ 1 9 9 6 2 5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 7 2

    5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 8 2 5 / 0 1 / 19 9 9 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 0 2 5 /0 1 / 2 0 0 1 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0

    2 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 3 2 5 / 01 / 2 0 0 4 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 52 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 6 2 5 / 0 1 /

    2 0 0 7Brazil_Oil Correlation

    Figure 2: Time Varying Conditional Correlation between Russian EquityReturns and Oil

    Price ReturnsJan 1995Feb 2007

    -0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.100.10.20.30.40.5

    2 5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 5 2 5 / 0 1/ 1 9 9 6 2 5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 7 2

    5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 8 2 5 / 0 1 / 19 9 9 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 0 2 5 /0 1 / 2 0 0 1 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0

    2 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 3 2 5 / 01 / 2 0 0 4 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 5

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    5/23

    2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 6 2 5 / 0 1 /2 0 0 7

    Russia_Oil Correlation

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    6/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    7/23

    25

    Figure 3: Time Varying Conditional Correlation between Indian EquityReturns and WTIOil Price ReturnsJan 1995Feb 2007

    India

    -0.5-0.3-0.10.10.30.5

    2 5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 5 2 5 / 0 1/ 1 9 9 6 2 5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 7 2

    5 / 0 1 / 1 9 9 8 2 5 / 0 1 / 19 9 9 2 5 / 0 1 / 2 0 0 0 2 5 /

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    8/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    9/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    10/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    11/23

    Key Indicators and StatisticsOriginal BRIC Articles and Related Content

    BRICs, Emerging Market Consumer InsightsChina in Africa: South Africa Joins BRICsSummitChinas Development Plans Lead World, BRICsChina and IndiaPlanning vs.

    JugaadGlobal Science Research and CollaborationGlobalizationBackground, Rankings and Articles

    Country pages:China,India (all with live news feeds, country background and statistics, andlinksto original articles)

    Economic Growth and Development of theBRICs

    From 2000 to 2008, the BRIC countries combined share of total world economic outputrosefrom 16 to 22 percent. Together, the BRIC countries accounted for 30 percent of the increase

    inglobal output during the period.To date, the scale ofChinas economy and pace of itsdevelopment has out-distanced those of itsBRIC peers. China alone contributed more than half of

    the BRIC countries share and greater than 15 percent of the growth in world economic outputfrom 2000 to 2008. The chart above onkey development indicators for the BRIC countries shows

    the sharp contrast in GDP,merchandise exports and the UNDPs Human Development Index(HDI) between China and theother BRIC countries.

    http://www.globalsherpa.org/bric-emerging-market-research-china-brazil-indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-africa-bricshttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-africa-bricshttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-africa-bricshttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/research-science-technology-internationalhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/globalization-globalisationhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/globalization-globalisationhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/globalization-globalisationhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/globalization-globalisationhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/chinahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/chinahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/globalization-globalisationhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/research-science-technology-internationalhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-africa-bricshttp://www.globalsherpa.org/china-africa-bricshttp://www.globalsherpa.org/bric-emerging-market-research-china-brazil-indiahttp://www.globalsherpa.org/bric-emerging-market-research-china-brazil-india
  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    12/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    13/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    14/23

    Growing BRIC Middle Class

    The rapid economic growth and demographics of China and India are expected to give rise toalarge middle class whose consumption would help drive the BRICs economic developmentandexpansion of the global economy. The charts below depict how the increase in the middleclass population of the BRIC countries is forecasted to more than double that of the developed

    G7economies. (Click on the images below to view the full-size charts in separate tabs orbrowser windows.)

    Science and Technology in the BRICs

    The BRIC countries of China, India and Brazil account for much of the dramatic increaseinscience research investments and scientific publications. Since 2002, global spending on

    scienceR&D has increased by 45 percent to more than $1,000 billion (one trillion) U.S. dollars.From2002 to 2007, China, India and Brazil more than doubled their spending on science

    research,raising their collective share of global R&D spending from 17 to 24percent.Chinasdevelopment planning has targeted a number of scientific fields and related industries,includingclean energy, green transportation and rare earths, among others. Since 1999, Chinasspending

    on science R&D has grown 20 percent annually to more than $100 billion. By 2020,China plansto invest 2.5 percent of GDP in science research.

    Next 11 Emerging Markets

    http://www.globalsherpa.org/research-science-technology-internationalhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/research-science-technology-internationalhttp://www.globalsherpa.org/research-science-technology-international
  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    15/23

    Many analysts and commentators have suggested expanding the original group of fourBRICnations to include other emerging markets. Goldman Sachs has resisted conferring BRIC

    statuson other developing countries on the grounds that their demographics andeconomiccharacteristics do not hold the potential for them to rival the economic size or

    influence of theBRIC countries or todays leading economies (e.g., U.S. and Japan).In a nod to

    the interest in other emerging markets, Goldman Sachs identified another group of economicallydynamic and promising developing countries creatively labeled the Next11 inits 2005Economics Paper No. 134 How Solid are the BRICs? The Next 11 consists of a broader group

    of emerging markets with the potential to play significant roles in the global

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    16/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    17/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    18/23

    Hong Kong, South Korea and Singapore. Combined with China and India, these fiveeconomies are likely to be the world's five most influential economies outside of the G6.

    On the other hand, when the "R" in BRIC is extended beyond Russia and is used as aloose term

    to include all of Eastern Europe as well, then the BRIC story becomes morecompelling. At issue

    are the multiple serious problems which confront Russia (decliningpopulation, potentially

    unstable government, environmental degradation, critical lack ofmodern infrastructure, etc), and

    the comparatively much lower growth rate seen in Brazil.However, Brazil's lower growth rate

    obscures the fact that the country is wealthier thanChina or India on a per-capita basis, has a

    more developed and global integrated financialsystem and has an economy potentially more

    diverse than the other BRICs due to its rawmaterial and manufacturing potential. In terms of

    GDP per capita, Brazil ranks 65th,Russia 59th, China 86th and India 118th. By comparison

    Korea currently ranks 36th,Singapore 25th, and Hong Kong 27th.

    Brazil's stock market, the Bovespa, has gone from approximately 8,700 in September2002 to

    over 70,000 in May 2008. Government policies have favored investment(lowering interest rates),

    retiring foreign debt and expanding growth, and a reformulationof the tax system is being voted

    in the congress. The British author and researcher MarkKobayashi-Hillary is editing a new book

    titled 'Building a Future with BRICs' forEuropean publisher Springer Verlag that examines the

    growth of the BRICs region andits effect on global sourcing. Contributors to the book include

    Nandan Nilekani, and ShivNadar, with publication scheduled for October 200740

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    19/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    20/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    21/23

    Findings:

    India will become third largest economy in world after China & United States in

    2050.41

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    22/23

  • 8/3/2019 23 Article

    23/23

    India will be in G-7 countries by 2027 about 10yr sooner than initially believed.

    India and Brazil are demographically in a substantially more favourable positionthan China and

    Russia... India, by contrast, will enjoy a very favourabledemographic momentum for another

    three decades.

    BRICs

    a

    10%

    player

    in

    the

    global

    economy.

    Total land area: 29%. Population: 43% of the world.Nominal GDP: 9%. Exports10% share. Foreign direct investment 6%. Foreign reserves: 24% of the world.

    Primary energy consumption among the BRICs rose 61.7% from 1985 to 2004,while global

    primary energy consumption increased 42.1% (contribution byBRICs: 33.2%). As a result, the

    percentage share of BRICs primary energyconsumption in the world rose from 22.7% in 1985 to

    25.8% in 2004

    CONCLUSIO