23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

download 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

of 12

Transcript of 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    1/12

    1

    IIT Kanpur

    Combustors

    •   In the combustor, the working fluid is heated (increase in stagnation temperature) by

    chemical reactions, the stagnation temperature rise across the combustor depends on

    the fuel/air ratio (f real) and the combustion efficiency (b)

    •   Liquid fuel (Jet‐A, JP‐8) is atomized and burned with air to form hot gases, the above

    process is carried out in a combustor which facilitates stabilization of reactions, with

    minimal stagnation pressure loss (~5% for gas turbine combustor)

    •   Gas turbine combustors are designed compact to reduce its weight and size and

    typically have high heat release intensity (20‐50 MW/m3‐atm), with residence time for

    gases ~10 ms, hence within a very short time, the fuel should atomize, vaporize, mixand burn with the air

    •   High combustion efficiency is expected (>99%) to minimize fuel wastage as well as to

    reduce pollutant emissions (unburned hydrocarbon (UHC), carbon‐monoxide (CO))

    •   For gas turbine combustors, reduction in pollutant emissions (oxides of Nitorgen (NOx),

    CO, UHC, soot) has gained interest and is one of the factors for combustor design due

    to enforced emission norms for civilian aircrafts

    Ramjet or afterburner

    Gas turbine combustor

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    2/12

    2

    IIT Kanpur

    Fundamental Stagnation Pressure Loss

    •   Constant area (A) duct, steady, 1D frictionless flow, assume calorically perfect gas

    and constant properties of air (, cp)

    •   No flow enters or leaves from the combustor sides, consider negligible fuel mass

    flow rate as compared to air mass flow rate so that the flow rate is assumed to besame at inlet and outlet

    •   u1, T1, P1 (T01, P01 can be calculated) and T02 and the inputs, knowledge of T02 and

    T01 gives the heat addition rate

      We want to find the stagnation pressure loss: Pb = (P01‐P02)/P01

    Mass balance:   0  

        ∀     ·

    0, steady

    0    

     

    Reactants   Products

    x

    CS

    CV

    21

    T1, P1   T2, P2

    u1   u2

    T02, P02T01, P01

    Frictionless

    A

     

    Rayleigh flow:

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    3/12

    3

    IIT Kanpur

    Fundamental Stagnation Pressure Loss

    Linear momentum relation:

    ∑  

        ∀     ·

    0, steady

           

       

       

     

     

    Energy conservation:

    State and stagnation relations:

     

     

           If T01 and T02 are inputs then f real can be calculated

           

       

           

        1  

        1  

     

     

         

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    4/12

    4

    IIT Kanpur

    Example

    •   Given: u1 = 128.5 m/s, T01 = 486.81 K, P01 = 3.144 bar and T02 = 1200 K

    •   cp = 1148 J/kg‐K, = 1.333, R = 287 J/kg‐K

    •   Find: fundamental stagnation pressure loss due to heat addition: Pb = (P01‐P02)/P01

        

    486.81

      .

      479.62  (M1 = 0.3)

      

      .

    .  2.152

     

      

      .

    ..

    .. 2.962

     

      2.152 128.5 276.53

    276.53 287 79364.11

    Stagnation properties:

    Density:

    Mass conservation:

      79364.11

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    5/12

    5

    IIT Kanpur

    Example

    Linear momentum relation:

           

    2.962 10

      276.53

      128.5

    2.962 10   276.53  35534.11

    331734.11   276.53

      331734.11 276.53

    Stagnation temperature relation:

        1  

    1200   

      1200  

    Substituting in mass conservation:

      79364.11

    331734.11 276.53     79364.11 1200  

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    6/12

    6

    IIT Kanpur

    Example

    331734.11  276.53 95236932 34.57

    241.96 331734.11  95236932 0

    1371.37  393606 0

      409 / (M2 = 0.62)

      1200  

      1127.14

      331734.11 276.53 409 2.186

      2.186  .

    .. 2.809

     ..

    .  0.107 10.7%

    (note: the other root will give supersonic speed neglected)

    for: u1 = 128.5 m/s (M1 = 0.3)

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    7/12

    7

    IIT Kanpur

    Example (lower inlet speed)

    •   note: significantly lower loss in the stagnation pressure if heat is added at lower inlet speeds

    for: u1 = 43.12 m/s

      486  (M1 = 0.1)

      3.123   2.239

     

      108.5 /

      1194.87  (M2 = 0.16)  3.060

    inputs: T01 = 486.81 K, P01 = 3.144 bar, T02 = 1200 K

      3.113

    0.98%   for: u1 = 43.12 m/s (M1 = 0.1)

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    8/12

    8

    IIT Kanpur

    Stagnation Pressure Loss

    •   Combustor stagnation pressure loss is due to (a)

    friction and aerodynamics and (b) heat addition,

    generally, frictional losses are ~ 2.5‐5% and heat

    addition losses are ~ 0.5‐1%•   Velocities at the exit of compressor are high

    (~100‐150 m/s), hence, the flow needs to be

    decelerated (~20‐30 m/s) before feeding it to

    the combustor this is done in a diffuser

    mounted upstream of the combustor Fig. A.7 Stagnation pressure loss in Rayleigh flow(Gas Turbine Theory by HIH Sarvanamuttoo, GFC

    Rogers, H Cohen, Dorling Kindersley, New Delhi, 2009)

      1

     

      1

     

     

     

     

     

    expanding in Taylor series:

      1

      1

     

      ⋯

     

     

      ⋯Higher order terms negligible for small M (

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    9/12

    9

    IIT Kanpur

    Incompressible (M < 0.3)

       

    Linear momentum relation:

             

    Stagnation pressure, incompressible flow:

       

     

     

     

     

     

      1

     

    Mass conservation:

     

     

    1 ≅ 

    1 ≅

     

    1inlet dynamic

    pressure

     

     

     

     

       ≅ 

     

    1

    For M < 0.3

     

    .

      .

    .

      .

      1.003

     .

    .

    1.021

    example:

    example:

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    10/12

    10

    IIT Kanpur

    Incompressible (M < 0.3)

       ≅ 

     

    1

    For u1 = 128.5 m/s

    ≅   .

    2.152 128.5   .

    1 8.3%

    For u1 = 43.12 m/s

     

    .

    2.152 43.12  

    . 1 0.93%

    in this case: M1 = 0.3 and M2 = 0.62

    in this case: M1 = 0.1 and M2 = 0.16

      ≅

     

    1  

    . 1 1.47 (typical value: 1‐2)

    loss in stagnation pressure due to heat addition is approximately 1.47 times the inlet

    dynamic head for the example problem (it is typically 1‐2 times the inlet dynamic head)

      ~ 20

    loss due to

    heat addition:

    loss due to

    friction and

    aerodynamics:

    typically frictional losses are dominant as compared to heat addition losses

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    11/12

    11

    IIT Kanpur

    Gas Turbine Combustor

    Fig. 1.8 Derivation of conventional combustor configuration.

    (Gas Turbine Combustion by Arthur H. Lefebvre, Second Edition, Taylor and Francis, New York, 1999)

    Simplest possible form of combustor – straight walled duct

    connecting the compressor and turbine, however, due to

    high compressor outlet velocities (~170 m/s) fundamental

    pressure losses would be very high

    To reduce this pressure loss, a diffuser is used to lower the

    velocity by a factor of about 5, still the air speed is high as

    compared to flame speed (~1 m/s)

    To provide a low velocity region combustion is sustained by

    recirculatory flow of burned products (e.g. by use of swirler

    or wake of a bluff body). The alloys used for combustor

    cannot sustain high flame temperatures

    Cooling arrangement (using film or back side cooling) is

    facilitated by a part of inlet air. The combustor outlet

    temperature is tailored by using dilution air to acceptable

    limit of turbine blades

  • 8/18/2019 23 - Air Breathing Engines - Combustors

    12/12

    12

    IIT Kanpur

    Gas Turbine Combustor (air flow distribution)

    Fig. 6.31 Air flow distribution in gas turbine combustor.

    (Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Propulsion by Philip Hill and Carl Peterson, Second Edition,

    Dorling Kindersley India Pvt. Ltd., Noida, 2010)

    •   About 12% of inlet air passes through swirling vanes that surround the fuel jet, inprimary zone, fuel/air ratio is nearly stoichiometric and is fed by other air flows

    (8% and 20%)

    •   Swirling flow creates low static pressure region near the centerline and results in

    recirculation of hot product gases and also facilitates low velocity region to

    stabilize combustion

    •   In dilution zone (~20% of inlet air) the temperature of gases is reduced to a level

    acceptable to turbine, uniform temperature at the combustor exit is desired to

    minimize thermal stresses in the turbine blades

    •   Cooling of the combustor liner is facilitated by film cooling from a part of theinlet air (~40%)