22/10/20151 CHAIRPERSON FOR FINANCE COMMITTES AG’S ACTION PLAN DATE: 29 MAY 2012.
-
Upload
tyler-preston -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of 22/10/20151 CHAIRPERSON FOR FINANCE COMMITTES AG’S ACTION PLAN DATE: 29 MAY 2012.
20/04/23 1
CHAIRPERSON FOR FINANCE COMMITTES
AG’S ACTION PLAN
DATE: 29 MAY 2012
PURPOSE
• Role of council and audit committee in the action plan
• To provide the status of municipalities in terms of implementation of the action plan
2
ACTION PLAN• Audit committee will have to check the progress on
the implementation of the action plan .• The committee is responsible for providing advice/
recommendations to Council• Based on the issues raised by AG, finance committee
can monitor or play an oversight role by analysing reports (e.g. sec 71, quarterly reports, etc) tabled in Council for the current financial year
• Chairperson of finance can request a report on the progress on implementation of AG’s Action plan
3
Action Plans to Address Findings
4
Municipality Number of findings
No of findings addressed
No of findings outstanding
Percentage addressed
Capricorn 37 28 9 76%
Polokwane 73 28 45 38%
Blouberg 62 8 54 13%
Aganang 81 3 78 4%
Lepelle-Nkumpi Action plan not ready as the AGSA is currently finalising the management letter and audit report with the municipality
Molemole 69 44 25 64%
Mopani 27 11 16 41%
Ba-Phalaborwa 46
Tzaneen 100
Maruleng 24 11 13 46%
Giyani 85
Letaba 40 24 16 60%
Action Plans to Address Findings
5
Municipality Number of findings
No of findings addressed
No of findings outstanding
Percentage addressed
Waterberg 10
Mogalakwena 20
Mookgophong 107 24 83 22%
Modimolle 60
Bela Bela 102
Lephalale 62 32 27 52%
Thabazimbi 57
Sekhukhune 85
Fetakgomo 30 30 0 100%
Makhuduthamaga 86 14 72 16%
Tubatse
Elias Motsoaledi 65 12 53 18%
Ephraim Mogale 31 8 23 26%
Action Plans to Address Findings
6
Municipality
Number of findings
No of findings addressed
No of findings outstanding
Percentage addressed
Vhembe 45 27 18 60%
Mutale
Thulamela 5 3 2 60%
Musina Action plan not developed
Makhado 56 26 30 46%
PT developed a Provincial standardised action plan to be used by municipalities.28 municipalities developed action plans which have been reviewed by the Audit Committee.Of 28 submitted action plans 17 have reported progress
Challenges on implementation of the Action Plans
• Audit steering committees not functional throughout the year
• Internal Audits not reviewing the implementation of audit action plans timeously
• Root causes not properly identified• Management not attending all audit steering
committee meetings• High vacancy rate / Inappropriate appointment• Lack of technical skills ( GRAP Standards)
7
Audit Outcomes per District
8
Audit Outcomes per District
9
Concerns and Challenges
10
1. Lack of timely submission of requested information2. Lack of supporting documentation to support balances3. Availability of key personnel such as the following
– CFOs– Section 54, 56 and 57 managers– Finance personnel– Technical Services personnel– Human resource personnel
4. Lack of knowledge and understanding of accounting standards 5. Expectations of the auditors to identify and correct
misstatements6. High reliance on consultants to do work on behalf of municipal
employees
Concerns and Challenges
11
7. Lack of monitoring and review of work done by consultants8. Lack of monitoring and review by managers and heads of
departments9. Action plans on prior year findings drawn up for
compliance purposes, recommendations not implemented10. No action plans on IT findings and it doesn’t seem to be
taken seriously, because there is a perception that it does not affect financials
11. MFMA Circular 50 and presentations made to CFOs on ideal audit file not adhered to
12. Commitments made by management on addressing control weaknesses as per key controls not done
Concerns and Challenges
12
13. Management does not see the value of a fully fledged internal audit department
14. Numerous non compliances with SCM policy and PPP15. Reporting on pre-determined objectives not taken seriously16. Lack of knowledge and understanding on how to report on
pre-determined objectives17. Non adherence to SLA’s with regard to water related
services18. Lack of constant monitoring and ensuring the correctness
of transferred balances with regard to water related transactions
19. Financial systems that are unreliable, differences between trial balances and AFS
13
Thank you