2019 Report INSIGHT‚ INNOVATION & INTENTION FOR IMPACT
Transcript of 2019 Report INSIGHT‚ INNOVATION & INTENTION FOR IMPACT
CONTENTS
02 INTRODUCTION 41 ASSOCIATIONPROGRAMME
05 2019 SOUTH AFRICAN CONTEXT 55 ENTREPRENEURIAL
EDUCATION
09 PROGRAMME THEORY OF CHANGE (TOC) 58 ALLAN GRAY
ENTREPRENEURIAL CHALLENGE
12 SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAMME 61 THE FOUNDATION
IN 2019
23 FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMME 64 CONCLUSION
2
INTRODUCTIONThis report provides an overview of the key changes in the context of the South African entrepreneurial ecosystem. It situates the Foundation’s programmes within this context by providing an overview of the highlights of each programme, the key demographic statistics, and key themes and indices related to the experiences of Programme Participants. It then provides an operational overview of the Foundation as it relates to Talent Management, Finance and Operations, and Impact Assurance.
The great American psychologist and philosopher, William James, once said “The great use of life is to spend it for something that will outlast it.”
To create a legacy is to ensure immortality, as the impact of one’s life is felt for generations to come. This Annual Report is the first that we have issued since the passing of our founder, Mr Allan Gray, on 10 November 2019 and the demonstration of our impact created within the document is proof that his legacy lives on well beyond the years of his life.
The themes of entrepreneurship, education, philanthropy and poverty alleviation were central to Mr Gray’s thinking. His values of long-term thinking; humility; and 'lifting as you rise', live on in our initiatives; and especially, in our commitment to a spirit of significance where success goes beyond personal wealth creation to reflect the contribution made to community, country, and to the world.
On that note, 2019 may be seen as a year that helped ready us for the context of the crisis that lay ahead. Of course, there was no way we could have foretold the coronavirus pandemic or the havoc it would wreak on South Africa’s economy, but it is nonetheless gratifying to know that our work is geared towards providing the kind of thinking that we need now, more than ever.
This has been demonstrated through our strategic theme for 2019 – I3 for Impact – which sought to emphasise the need for Insight, Innovation and Intention, all of which, properly applied, lead to impact. Put another way, insight is about thinking deeply, innovation is about thinking broadly, and intention is about thinking “straight” – being focused ahead on what you need and want to do. Each is necessary, individually and collectively, to achieve the kind of impact we envision. Thus, our new Strategic Initiatives, that go beyond our core programmes to add greater efficiency and efficacy to our work, were mapped against this theme.
This was the lens through which we viewed 2019; a year that was celebrated in South Africa for many achievements in areas like sport, culture and the arts. Behind all the applause and jubilation, however, is another reality; that of a country crippled by high unemployment and stagnant economic growth, with few opportunities for millions of young people who were unable to access a high-quality education. Contrasted harshly against the many accolades we earned last year is a title we are far less proud to have been awarded by Time magazine: that of the most unequal country in the world, with the glaring discrepancies between the rich and poor highlighted in grim detail on its May cover.
3
4
We are faced with deep structural problems that require a groundswell of strong, focused, ethical leadership and entrepreneurial thinking – and the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation’s work is at the nexus of creating and nurturing just that; the deep inequities as evidenced during this crisis are a stark reminder of the crucial need to identify this potential and develop the mindset from early on.
Our approach takes the form of a long-term investment in young people with entrepreneurial potential, from as early as 12 years old. It recognises that entrepreneurship is often the outcome of years of nurturing the type of mindset that allows opportunities to be discovered, validated and created into a viable offering. In line with this, it requires entrepreneurial behaviour to be practised and honed. The Foundation therefore believes that entrepreneurship is both an art and a science, and we believe in rooting our work within both spheres – ensuring it is based on deep research and thought, but also incorporating artistic flair, imagination and intuition.
CapeBio, founded by AGOF Fellows Dineo Lioma and Daniel Ndima, is a case in point. It is our objective to ensure that programme participants are able to recognize a societal need, and create an innovative solution to address it. Dineo and Daniel demonstrated this ability with their response to the Covid-19 crisis, with the development of a testing kit that can provide results in less than two hours. This speaks directly to our goal of fostering socially responsible entrepreneurs. It is also an excellent example of how an entrepreneurial mindset can help to create logic out of patterns and innovation in chaos, and help you forge ahead amid great uncertainty and hesitation.
Seeing the contribution such ventures are making to society is a rewarding validation of our work and serves to keep us focused on what can be achieved. We have often spoken of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the need to future-proof individuals against the challenges it would bring. Those challenges are no longer in the future. They have arrived. And we need to be able to create ways of supporting the youth that cut through the resulting disruption and complexity to enable them to identify and optimise the opportunities.
The impact of these early inputs into young people is visible from our outcomes: during the past year, we had the best throughput rate in the history of our Scholarship programme, which means that more talented young people from marginalized communities were able to harness their entrepreneurial potential and grow their leadership skills while attending leading high schools across the country. Meanwhile, our Candidate Fellows have impressed us with their entrepreneurial ability, with a significant number having established businesses while still at university. Our Allan Gray Fellows have been busy, too: a number have gone on to establish dynamic ventures which we are certain will have a marked impact on their communities. Yet others, are practising entrepreneurial leadership within other business and social environments.
This is an exciting confirmation that identifying entrepreneurial potential early; and providing the right training, support and resources to nurture and develop it will result in the dynamic, responsible changemakers of the future that we are aiming for. That said, we acknowledge that there is still much to be done. And with one of the most challenging times in modern history upon us, we are up for the task.
2019 SOUTH AFRICAN CONTEXT
A key challenge facing South Africa is its chronically high unemployment rate. Figures from the fourth quarter of 2019 report that 29.1% of economically active people aged 15–64 years are unemployed, and this figure rises to 38.7% when individuals who have given up searching for a job are included (Statistics South Africa, 2019). Youth unemployment is particularly concerning, with approximately 40.1% of young people aged 15–34 years not in employment, education or training. Internationally, there is a growing interest in the role that entrepreneurship can play as a catalyst to achieve employment, innovation, growth and equity, through both high-growth enterprises as well as necessity driven-entrepreneurship (Valerio et al., 2014).
The Global Entrepreneurship Indicator (GEI), an annual index that measures the health of entrepreneurship ecosystems in 137 countries, recognises that entrepreneurs do not exist in a vacuum and that the entrepreneurship ecosystem affects the entrepreneurial activity of a country (GEDI, 2020). The GEI is made up of three building blocks or sub-indices: entrepreneurial attitudes, entrepreneurial abilities and entrepreneurial aspirations (the 3As). These three building blocks stand on 14 pillars, each of which contains an individual and an institutional variable that corresponds to the micro- and the macro-level aspects of entrepreneurship.
In 2019 South Africa was ranked 58th out of 137 countries with a GEI score of 31.6 (Ács et al., 2019). This score suggests that South Africa is operating at 31.6% of its entrepreneurial capacity, compared to the United States which is ranked 1st with a score 86.8. South Africa’s GEI score has fluctuated over recent years but has declined over the 2015–2019 period, from a score of 40 to 31.6. While this suggests that the health of the ecosystem has been declining, South Africa performs well relative to other Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries (Knoema, 2019). South Africa is ranked 2nd in the region, behind Botswana (ranked 1st in the region and 51st overall, with a score of 34.4) and ahead of Namibia (ranked 3rd in the region and 62nd overall, with a score of 30) (Ács et al., 2019).
31.6—2019
SOUTH AFRICA GEI SCORE
—SOUTH AFRICA RANKED #58
OUT OF 137 COUNTRIES
—SOUTH AFRICA RANKED #2
IN THE SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAN REGION
“ INTERNATIONALLY, THERE IS A GROWING INTEREST IN THE ROLE THAT ENTREPRENEURSHIP CAN PLAY AS A CATALYST TO ACHIEVE EMPLOYMENT, INNOVATION, GROWTH AND EQUITY, THROUGH BOTH HIGH-GROWTH ENTERPRISES AS WELL AS NECESSITY DRIVEN-ENTREPRENEURSHIP. ”Valerio et al., 2014
5
6
South Africa’s strong performance vis-à-vis countries in SSA is largely driven by the aspirations sub-index that measures the quality aspects of startups and new businesses. Specifically, it looks at whether early-stage entrepreneurs want to create high-growth businesses (i.e., introduce new products and/or services, develop new production processes, penetrate foreign markets, substantially increase their company’s staff, and finance their business with formal and/or informal venture capital) (Ács et al., 2019). South Africa is ranked 49th (39.2 score) overall for the aspirations sub-index, ahead of both Botswana and Namibia, which are ranked 72nd and 60th, respectively.
South Africa performs worse in both the attitudes and abilities sub-indices. Specifically, South Africa is ranked 81st (26.3 score) in the attitudes index that measures society’s attitudes towards entrepreneurship (including the population’s general feelings about recognising opportunities, knowing entrepreneurs personally, endowing entrepreneurs with high status, accepting the risks associated with business startups, and having the skills to launch a business successfully). South Africa also ranked 62nd (29.3 score) in the abilities score, which measures the entrepreneurs’ characteristics and those of their businesses.
The table below reports South Africa’s GEI results on the pillar level, where pillar scores provide an indication of the strengths and bottlenecks in the ecosystem. South Africa’s weakest pillar is startup skills (0.079), followed by risk capital (0.163), risk acceptance (0.242), technology absorption (0.243) and human capital (0.277). South Africa’s strongest pillars are high growth (0.611), internationalisation (0.529), process innovation (0.525) and product innovation (0.511) – all of which drive the strong entrepreneurial aspirations score that suggests South Africa is able to innovate and create high-growth firms (SABF & AGOF, 2017).
TABLE 1: South Africa’s GEI results
PILLAR-LEVEL GEI SCORES OF SOUTH AFRICA IN 2019
Entrepreneurial Attitudes 26.29 (81st)Opportunity Perception 0.459
Startup Skills 0.079Risk Acceptance 0.242
Networking 0.298Cultural Support 0.376
Entrepreneurial Abilities 29.35 (62nd)Opportunity Startup 0.328
Technology Absorption 0.243Human Capital 0.277
Competition 0.445Entrepreneurial Aspirations 39.19 (49th)
Product Innovation 0.511Process Innovation 0.525
High Growth 0.611Internationalisation 0.529
Risk Capital 0.162Global Entrepreneurship Index 31.6 (62nd)
Source: Ács et al., 2019
Turning to another global measure of entrepreneurship, the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index ranks South Africa 84th out of 190 economies with a score of 67 (World Bank, 2020). This index measures the regulations applying to small and medium-size companies through their life cycle including quantitative indicators for starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts, and resolving insolvency. While South Africa’s ranking classifies it as “easy” to do business in, its ranking has steadily declined from 28th in 2006 to 84th in 2019.
Despite South Africa’s strong GEI performance relative to other SSA countries and its relative ease of doing business, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor reports suboptimal entrepreneurial activity in the country. Specifically, South Africa’s total early-stage entrepreneurial activity (TEA) score is 10.77, below both the regional (12.08) and global (12.81) average (GEM, 2019).
As a way to promote entrepreneurship and its attendant consequences, various organisations and interventions aim to provide support and alleviate constraints in South Africa’s entrepreneurship ecosystem. The Aspen Network for Development Entrepreneurs’ (ANDE, 2017) ecosystem map provides a view of support available to entrepreneurs in South Africa. As of 2017, 340 organisations are providing financial and non-financial support to businesses in the ideation to growth maturity phases. These organisations include direct finance providers (such as government/DFIs, fund managers, venture capitalists and angel funders, private equity, specialised finance, and crowd funders) who offer debt, equity and grant funding. There are also capacity development providers, including government, corporate, non-profit and for-profit service providers. In addition, a number of other foundations and academic, consulting, media and networking organisations provide support in the entrepreneurial ecosystem.
The Allan Gray Orbis Foundation, established in 2005, is one such organisation providing support in the form of entrepreneurship education and training. The overarching vision and mission of the Foundation is to contribute to an entrepreneurial, equitable South Africa, flourishing with meaningful employment by nurturing the entrepreneurial potential of young individuals. To achieve this goal, the Foundation offers three core programmes: a Scholarship Programme for high school learners, a Fellowship Programme for university students, and an Association for graduated Programme Participants who then become the Fellowship alumni.
#84—
SOUTH AFRICA WORLD BANK’S EASE OF DOING
BUSINESS INDEX RANK
—SOUTH AFRICA
TEA SCORE 10.77
“ THE OVERARCHING VISION AND MISSION OF THE FOUNDATION IS TO CONTRIBUTE TO AN ENTREPRENEURIAL, EQUITABLE SOUTH AFRICA, FLOURISHING WITH MEANINGFUL EMPLOYMENT BY NURTURING THE ENTREPRENEURIAL POTENTIAL OF YOUNG INDIVIDUALS. ”
7
8
The Scholarship Programme and Fellowship Programme focus on entrepreneurship education, specifically entrepreneurial mindset development, personal and academic development. The overall aim of the two programmes is to select young individuals with entrepreneurial potential, and develop their passion and potential to become high-impact, responsible entrepreneurs. Fundamental to these two programmes is the belief that education plays an important role in an entrepreneur’s journey. Scholarship Programme Participants are selected in Grade 6, prepared in Grade 7 and placed at an esteemed partner school to start in Grade 8. Fellowship Programme Participants are selected in Grade 12 or in their first year of university and receive educational funding to complete their degree at one of our 11 partner universities.
All graduated Fellowship Programme Participants (i.e., Fellows) become part of the Association, which focuses on entrepreneurship training and includes programme offerings in five portfolios: Capital, Ventures, Careers, Community, and Leadership. The Association community has access to merit-based postgraduate funding, entrepreneurial and business development support as well as business funding from our partner organisation, E2.
In addition to the three core programmes, the Foundation runs the Allan Gray Entrepreneurship Challenge (AGEC) in partnership with Allan Gray Limited. Launched in 2017, the AGEC aims to provide access to entrepreneurship education across South Africa through a 6 week entrepreneurship programme. It is open to all high school students who seek to cultivate an entrepreneurial mindset through gamified learning in the form of online micro-challenges.
FIGURE 1: The Foundation’s Value Chain
MINDSET
SKILLSET
High-impact Responsible Entrepreneur
ScholarshipFellowship
AssociationE2
Entrepreneurship Education
Building capabilities, skills and mindsets for the purpose of entrepreneurship. The goal is to expand
the pool of potential entrepreneurs.
Entrepreneurship Training
Building knowledge and skills in preparation for starting or operating a business. The goal is to aid
entrepreneurs to become high-impact entrepreneurs.
AGEC
PROGRAMME THEORY OF CHANGE (TOC)
A theory of change is a way of demonstrating how an organisation achieves impact through the work it does. It shows the pathway between action, outcomes and impact, and conditions under which impact can occur. It is core to measuring impact as it highlights important areas that need to be tracked to better understand the impact an organisation is making. The Foundation has recently undertaken an external evaluation of its programmes. Through this process, its ToC was reviewed. These changes will be communicated in future, but for the purpose of this report, the following outcomes and scores still hold.
The Foundation’s ToC shows the progression from the selection of Programme Participants to their personal and entrepreneurial development. It illustrates how Programme Participants move from achieving developmental milestones related to where they are in their lives, to being able to work with one another, to becoming intent on starting up an entrepreneurial venture and eventually taking entrepreneurial action. The result of such follow through is the creation of meaningful jobs through their ventures, which in turn can bring about socio-economic prosperity in the country.
High-potential individuals are selected
Programme Participants are responsible high-impact entrepreneurs
Enterprises are created that offer meaningful employment for South Africa
Self-Awareness Academic Excellence Collaboration Community Responsible Entreprene
urship
Com
peten
ce
Mind
set
Lifelong Learning
Collaboration
Activating Starting up
Displayin
g high
-impac
t entr
epren
euria
l valu
es
81.25%
—OUTCOME 10
Programme Participants intend to become high-impact responsible entrepreneurs
80.5%
—OUTCOME 2
Programme Participants have a greater self-awareness and awareness of themselves in
relation to others
9
Although all the programmes align with the Foundation’s Theory of Change, they were not all measured on the same or on all of the outcomes (refer to Table 2). This is because some outcomes are not relevant for a particular phase of development for Programme Participants in a particular programme. Programme Participants’ agreement with a series of statements are assessed. Each statement is linked to a TOC outcome that is relevant to their programme and the phase of development they are in.
The Foundation’s ToC index scores (i.e. all 10 outcomes as measured across the three programmes) improved by 1% overall in 2019. This was largely due to an improvement in the ToC index scores for the Association. However, it should be noted that the sample size of Fellows for the year-end review (YER) survey was small and that the YER index scores are aggregated across all three programmes. Those outcomes related to academics, life-long learning and valuing responsible entrepreneurship also scored low. These need to be focused on as areas of improvement for the programmes in 2020. Nevertheless, the outcome scores that emphasise our impact pathway were higher.
The highest scoring outcomes across all programmes were:
Programme Participants have a greater self-awareness and awareness of themselves in relation to others
OUTCOME 2
Programme Participants work collaboratively together on entrepreneurial activitiesOUTCOME 9
Programme Participants intend to become high-impact responsible entrepreneursOUTCOME 10
The lowest scoring outcomes across all programmes were:
Programme Participants achieve academic excellenceOUTCOME 3
Programme Participants value responsible entrepreneurshipOUTCOME 6
Programme Participants pursue life-long learningOUTCOME 8
10
TABLE 2: ToC outcomes and scores across programmes
Theory of Change Outcome Scholarship Programme
Fellowship Programme
Association of Allan Gray Fellows Overall
O1: Programme Participants are selected who display the potential to become high-impact responsible entrepreneurs 51 156 Not applicable 207
O2: Programme Participants have a greater self-awareness and awareness of themselves in relation to others 83% (up 8%) 78% (down 3%) Not applicable 80.5%
O3: Programme Participants achieve academic excellence 53% (down 3%) 50% (up 1%) Not applicable 51.5%O4: Programme Participants value collaboration 60% (down 4%) 64% (down 1%) 65% (down 4.8%) 63%O5: Programme Participants value the Allan Gray Orbis community 79% (down 4%) 79% (down 8%) 63.3% (down 2.9%) 73.8%
O6: Programme Participants understand and value responsible entrepreneurship – 39% (down 2%) 84.8% (up 13.9%) 61.9%
O7: Programme Participants have developed an improved of entrepreneurial mindset and competencies – 78% (up 1%) 74.4% (down 0.4%) 76.2%
O8: Programme Participants pursue life-long learning – 25% (down 7%) 65% (down 5.9%) 45%O9: Programme Participants work collaboratively on entrepreneurial activities – 77% (up 4%) – 77%
10: Programme Participants intend to become high-impact responsible entrepreneurs – 77% (down 4%) 85.5% (up 30.6%) 81.25%
Overall score 64.9% (down 2.2%) 64% (down 1.7%) 74.6% (up 7.4%) 67.8% (up 1%)
11
The Scholarship Programme was able to achieve higher numbers of applications to the programme through the Scholarship selection process in 2019. Moreover, in 2019 the programme increased the intake of Grade 8s to 51 (the highest it has been over the past three years). In addition to that, there were 14 Scholars who were offered the Fellowship opportunity, and two who were offered the Jakes Gerwel Fellowship opportunity. Scholars performed well academically, with 74% of Grade 8–12 Scholars achieving the benchmark academic requirements for the Fellowship Programme. Moreover, all Scholars who took part in the Scholarship Programme were retained.1
While the programme did very well in terms of these key metrics, programme changes in 2019 did result in changes and a drop in key ToC outcome scores and the programme’s net promoter score. This is covered extensively in the section that follows. The following section also captures key demographic statistics, year-end review (YER) survey results and feedback captured during the survey and interview processes.
SCHOLARSHIP Programme
12
1 Two more were offered the Jakes Gerwel Fellowship opportunity, a programme funded by the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation Endowment and aimed at entrepreneurially minded students who would like to become educators and change agents in the South African education system.
149scholars
GENDER AND RACE DISTRIBUTION
58%female
42%male
2019 COHORT BY GRADE
“ [WHAT HAS BEEN THE MOST BENEFICIAL PART OF THE PROGRAMME THIS YEAR?]…I THINK THAT THE MOST BENEFICIAL ASPECT OF THE PROGRAMME TO ME THIS YEAR WAS THE, PROMOTION OF GROUP WORK WHEN WORKING THROUGH SPECIFIC PROBLEMS OR WHEN TRYING TO ADOPT BEST ENTREPRENEURIAL SOLUTIONS. ”(Grade 9 Scholar, Female, Epworth Independent High School for Girls)
DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
HIGHLIGHTS
100%Retention
74%Scholars
performing above academic eligibility
4 660Applications
received
56Scholars received
distinctions
TOTAL SCHOLARS 2019149ONBOARDED 201951GRADUATED 201922EXITED 20190
34
Grade 8
30
Grade 9
30
Grade 10
32
Grade 11
23
Grade 12
130Black African
13Coloured
2White
1Indian
1Asian
1Mixed Race
1Other/Unkown
BECOMING A FELLOW IN
THE FUTURE
77%yes
23%unsure
BECOMING AN ENTREPRENEUR
90%yes
10%unsure
13
SCHOLARSHIP SELECTION
Scholarship Programmme
Highlights
� The application forms received numbered 4 660, which is a 51% increase from the forms received in the 2018/2019 campaign.
� Of these applicants, 1 182 were eligible to write the Foundation’s Maths and English exams in December of 2019.
� The selection campaign did not meet the target of reaching 1 000 Black African eligible applicants. Only 990 of the 1 182 eligible applicants were Black African (i.e. 99% of the target), which was 1% short of meeting the target. The Scholarship opportunity was offered to 51 applicants. They were successfully placed and are set to start Grade 8 in January of 2020.
Scholar achievements
There were numerous Scholars who achieved leadership recognition at their placement schools in 2019. The table below summarises these achievements as well as other opportunities accessed by Scholars.
TABLE 3: Scholar achievements in 2019
Scholar School Achievement
Ayabukwa Mntalo – Grade 11 Clarendon GirlsHead of HostelSchool Prefect
Achuma Koshitini – Grade 11 Clarendon Girls Deputy Head of Hostel
Exchange in Europe for 1 weekSange Tshakumane – Grade 11 Clarendon Girls School Prefect
Kiara Bouw – Grade 11 Collegiate Girls School PrefectIfhechukwu Ludjoe – Grade 11 St Cyprian Deputy Heat of Hostel
John Torcida – Grade 11 St Andrews Boys Exchange to India for 6 weeksUbaid-Dullah Samsodien Grade – 11 Bishops Exchange in Netherlands
Thandiswa Nkosi – Grade 11 St Mary’s Girls Deputy Head of HostelImitha Gala – Grade 11 Pietermaritzburg Girls School Prefect
Phiwokuhle Mzobe – Grade 12 Pietermaritzburg Girls School Prefect
—4 660
APPLICATION FORMS RECEIVED
74%
—ACHIEVED THE FELLOWSHIP
ACADEMIC BENCHMARK
—100%
SCHOLARS RETAINED
14
In order to be eligible for Scholarship selection, applicants need to meet the demographic (race and income level) and academic requirements as set out in the Scholarship Selection protocol. Moreover, eligible applicants are also assessed against the Foundation’s organisational pillars to screen for motivational fit and entrepreneurial potential.
The 2019 selection campaign saw more applications than ever before and most of these were from females. Most of the eligible applicants who could proceed with the Scholarship selection process were from Gauteng, the Western Cape, the Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal; similar to previous years.
FIGURE 2: Scholarship applications received between the years 2013–2019
Applications Eligible Applications
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2 090 563 2 265 449 3 035 858 3 432 1 216 4 157 1 014 3 079 773 4 660 1 182
TABLE 4: Regional distribution of eligible applicants participating in the test-writing phase of the Scholarship selection process
Year Gauteng Western Cape KwaZulu-Natal Eastern Cape Mpumalanga Northern Cape North West Limpopo Free State Total Test Writers
2018 34 35 11 37 3 0 2 6 7 1352019 28 49 9 16 2 0 1 1 1 1072020 24 34 23 23 6 1 2 0 0 113
FIGURE 3: Gender split of applicants who were eligible to proceed with the selection process
78%female
22%male
15
Scholar demographics and trends
The demographic distribution of Programme Participants in the Scholarship Programme in 2019 was similar to that of 2018. The current cohort was comprised of 58% female Scholars and 42% male Scholars. 87% of the group identified as Black African. In terms of distribution by Grade, the Grade 8s was the largest group in this cohort of Scholars, which is indicative of the programme taking on a few more Scholars compared to previous years. The grade with the smallest group of Scholars was the Grade 12s.
Scholars were placed in various schools across four of the country’s provinces: the Western Cape, the Eastern Cape, Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal. While the trend of the top ten placement schools remain the same, the most Scholars were placed in King Edward VII School (n=14). This is reflected in the table below.
TABLE 5: Distribution of Scholars by placement school
School name Number of Scholars
King Edward VII School 14Bishops Diocesan College 13
Epworth Independent High School for Girls 12St Alban’s College 12
St Andrew’s School for Girls 11Clarendon High School for Girls 10
St Cyprian’s School 10St Mary’s School, Waverley 9Rhenish Girls’ High School 8
Pietermaritzburg Girls’ High School 7Collegiate Girls’ High School 6Pretoria Boys High School 6
Roedean School 6Maritzburg College 4Selborne College 4
Rondebosch Boys’ High School 3St Stithians GC Girls’ College 3The Diocesan School for Girls 3
Michaelhouse 2Rustenburg Girls’ High School 2St Stithians BC Boys’ College 2
Grey Boys High School 1St Andrew’s College 1
Total 149
16
Scholars are required to maintain high academic averages. The benchmark currently used is aggregate passes, which are quality passes, and passes that are above 70% for the final year Scholars. This is used to determine eligibility for the Fellowship Programme early on. It is also used as a means of understanding year-on-year improvement in Scholar academic results.
FIGURE 4: Scholar eligibility rate for the Fellowship Programme
Overall
Grade 11
Grade 10
Grade 9
Grade 8
Eligible Ineligible
74%
75%
57%
70%
76%
30%
24%
43%
26%
25%
Of the Grade 12 Scholars registered in 2019, 22 of them passed matric; one Scholar took a leave of absence. They achieved a total of 56 distinctions across subjects, and 95.6% (n=22) of them had bachelor passes. Notably, four Scholars achieved academic averages above 80%.
The number of Scholars intent on becoming Candidate Fellows rose from 76% in 2018 to 77% in 2019.
The entrepreneurial intent of Scholars in 2019, in terms of percentage, was similar to that of the 2018 cohort. In each cohort, 90% of them wanted to become entrepreneurs in the next 10–15 years. This is displayed in Figure 7.
FIGURE 5: Scholarship throughput into the Fellowship Programme
SCOLARS IN GRADE 12
14Scholars selected into Fellowship
23Scholars in Matric
21Applied for Fellowship
opportunity
56—
DISTINCTIONS
22—
GRADE 12 BACHELOR’S PASSES
90%—
INTEND TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURS
FIGURE 6: Scholar intention to become a Candidate Fellow
2019
2018
No Unsure Yes
23% 77%
76%22%
2%
FIGURE 7: Scholar intention to become an entrepreneur
2019
2018
No Unsure Yes
10% 90%
90%
6% 4%
17
Theory of Change outcomes
The Scholarship Programme is measured against Outcomes 2, 3, 4 and 5. The highest scoring outcome (and the only outcome that showed a higher score than 2018) was Outcome 2: Scholars have greater self-awareness and awareness of themselves in relation to others. The lowest scoring outcome was Outcome 3: Scholars achieve academic excellence. This is because Scholars indicated that they were unable to achieve their academic goals in 2019. This is reflected in Figure 8.
FIGURE 8: Theory of Change index scores for the Scholarship Programme
2015 (n=122) 2016 (n=113) 2017 (n=157) 2018 (n=55) 2019 (n=71)
O2: Scholars have greater self-awareness & awareness of themselves
in relation to others
O3: Scholars achieve academic excellence
O4: Scholars value collaboration O5: Scholars value the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation Community
84% 74% 73% 75% 83% 54% 56% 58% 56% 53% 63% 62% 63% 64% 60% 84% 85% 83% 83% 79%
—85%
SCHOLARS VALUE ALLAN GRAY ORBIS COMMUNITY
FIGURE 9: Scholar experience of the Scholarship Programme in 2019
SCHOLARSHIP EXPERIENCE
2019
45% good
39% wow
15% ok
1% bad
Programme experience
Scholars had a positive experience of the programme in 2019. However, their overall rating of the programme was lower in 2019 compared to previous years. The increased workload brought about through revisions to the programme curriculum and the introduction of the online learning platform was cited as part of the reason for their less positive views this time around. The same downward trend is apparent in the Scholars’ Net Promoter Score (NPS) rating of the programme in 2019. The NPS rating is a measure of how likely Programme Participants are to recommend their programme to others.
18
Figure 11 illustrates how the NPS score for the Scholarship Programme dropped in 2019, but nevertheless remained above the 70 mark, indicating that Scholars are highly satisfied by what the programme has to offer.
FIGURE 10: Net Promoter Score (NPS) of Scholars in the Scholarship Programme over time
Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Overall67 83 57 83 75 72 92 91 87 83 75 83
2019 2018
FIGURE 11: NPS Score of Scholars of the Scholars across grades in 2019
–100 +100
0
+30–30
+50–50
–70
SCHOLARSHIP 2019
75
Not likely at all
Extremely likely
Neutral
NPS
FIGURE 12: Scholars’ self-perception of their leadership development journey
LEADERSHIP SELF RATING
2019
73% yes
24% unsure
3% no
19
20
Scholars enjoyed what the programme had to offer in 2019. The in-person events such as Jamboree and Development Camps were among their highlights. They valued the learning and support provided in the form of Courageous Conversations, Breakthrough Sessions, the online learning platform. The support they received from their SDOs (Scholarship Development Officers, which have recently been renamed as Programme Officers) was also invaluable. The following quotes from Scholars highlight how these programme offerings contributed to their growth and development in 2020. These quotes form part of the YER Survey that requires Scholars to specify what aspect of the programme was the most important to them that year.
JAMBOREE
“ Jamboree showed me becoming an entrepreneur has no age limit or time frame. ” (Grade 11 Scholar, YER survey)
GRADE 8 AND 9 DEVELOPMENT CAMP
“ The talks at the Grade 8 & 9 Development Camp. ” (Grade 8 Scholar, YER survey)
COURAGEOUS CONVERSATIONS
“ The Courageous Conversations between my SDO and myself. ” (Grade 10 Scholar, YER survey)
BREAKTHROUGH SESSIONS
“ The Breakthrough helped us understand entrepreneurship and [meet] people who are passionate about this rather than [watching] a slideshow or [doing] a worksheet. We managed to interact more effectively with different angles of businesses. ” (Grade 9 Scholar, YER survey)
SCHOLARSHIP DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DISCUSSIONS
“ Honesty and courage. My SDO has helped me in so many ways and has given me courage to face challenges I had previously swept under the carpet. Thank you. ” (Grade 12 Scholar, YER survey)
ONLINE LEARNING PLATFORM
“ The online learning platform and the challenges keep me abreast [of] my entrepreneurial endeavours. I am constantly looking and analysing my performance in different challenges. The competition aspect makes it more fun and the prizes are awesome. ” (Grade 9 Scholar, YER survey)
GROWTH MINDSET
“ It taught me to have a growth mindset. I can now grow from my failures to do even better. I know that if I fail, I can overcome that failure by dedication and pure hard work. ” (Grade 8 Scholar, YER survey)
I WAS NOT TAUGHT TO BECOME A LEADER, I WAS ENCOURAGED
TO NURTURE THE SEED THAT WAS ALREADY PLANTED INSIDE ME.
Kiara Bouw
SCHOLARSHIP IMPACTKIARA BOUW
She was a mere nine months old when her parents got divorced. Society might regard her being raised by a single mom with financial difficulties as the quintessential girl from a broken home, but she doesn’t. Kiara and her two older sisters were swaddled in their mother’s love. Their home was never broken and even though they struggled, Kiara feels that they were never robbed of any experiences.
In fact, Kiara regards every struggle as a stumbling block that has turned into a building block for a better future. These struggles built her character and laid the foundation for a future in and passion for entrepreneurship. She remembers selling earrings to buy electricity for their home. Sweets were sold for birthday parties and the proceeds from raffle tickets were put towards her first cell phone.
Kiara cannot remember a time when she wasn’t ambitious. “I believed in making things happen,” she says. She chased success, from earning little stickers to eventually earning trophies. She excelled as a mini entrepreneur at their school’s entrepreneur days and she excelled as an orator in competitions, having her confidence boosted to boot. These achievements were fuelled by a desire to create a better life for her and her family.
An encounter with a younger schoolmate made her realise that success just for the sake of it wasn’t all she wanted. This younger learner called Kiara her role model – a title that both surprised and inspired her. While Kiara couldn’t think of anything specific she had done to be dubbed a role model, she proudly recalled the smiles and respect she always bestowed on her peers. That encounter made the first thought of being a leader pop into her head and in her final year at her primary school, Kiara was made head girl. This was also the year she was awarded the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation Scholarship.
21
Kiara’s adventures in leadership and entrepreneurship have continued through her high school career, growing in variety and magnitude. She has hosted high teas, sold cosmetics, and organised booze cruises (for adults). She has also learned to deal with large amounts of money. “Once you work with a relatively large amount of money, you realise what little power it actually has.” This realisation made her question the impact her business ventures were having. Her most recent business idea highlights the plight of the environment, particularly the mountain of plastic ending up in our oceans. The idea entails creating an app that encourages shoppers to dispose of plastic waste correctly by rewarding them with discount vouchers at grocery stores. While it will take a few more years of app development before PlastiGo is a fully fledged business, the idea itself has received recognition from the Foundation community. In 2019 she was nominated as the Emerging Entrepreneur at the Foundation’s National Jamboree.
As regards leadership, Kiara has taken on many more roles since leaving primary school. She has been appointed as school prefect at her high school, as deputy head girl of her hostel and as a member of the school’s governing body. As a little cherry on top, she has been invited to the 2020 MIT Conference in Singapore.
She believes that a leader serves as a candle that sets others on fire, so she has used the platform created by her leadership positions to launch a tutoring system in her hostel. Recalling one of the songs sung at Scholarship Camp, Kiara bursts into song: “Shape the future! Start here!” These lyrics, she says, are still etched in her mind. Of the Scholarship’s impact on her life she explains: “I was not taught to become a leader, I was encouraged to nurture the seed that was already planted inside me.”
Kiara’s goal of pursuing her studies in Accounting and eventually becoming a CA is rooted in her fascination with education. From a young age she realised that not every child was able to attend school. Her best friend, who lived in an orphanage had to drop out of school due to financial constraints. She hopes that as a CA she could one day use her skills to successfully manage many schools’ finances and maybe even provide free education for all. She also dreams of building a community centre that teaches sustainable skills. Giving somebody a fish every day is one thing but teaching them how to fish is something very different!
Her greatest dream come true would be to eradicate unemployment in its totality, but she acknowledges that this is wishful thinking. All I can do is heed Nelson Mandela’s words: “Do what you can with what you have where you are.”
The Foundation has served as a source of hope in my life and in the lives of my family. Their financial support resembles the steel frames that are characteristic of any building’s strength. The Foundation has not only provided me with resources and opportunities that would otherwise be a far-off dream, they have also carried me through trying times and nurtured my spirit of entrepreneurship. They have become my soft place to fall. Being awarded the Scholarship will remain one of my life’s biggest accomplishments.
22
FELLOWSHIP Programme
2019 was a great year for the Fellowship Programme; time was spent reflecting on and evaluating the programme’s performance against key success factors. The mandate and vision of the programme was unpacked and clarified, and the typical realities and scenarios facing the Programme Participants were explored. Knowledge like this allows us to better adapt the strategic programme directives going forward. A major highlight this year was the fact that the number of Programme Participants grew significantly. This and other highlights are further discussed below. There is also a summation of key demographic figures regarding the composition of the Fellowship Programme and a description of the Fellowship selection process. Thereafter, an overview of the key YER survey results is provided according to each outcome measured for the Fellowship Programme.
23 23
Highlights
� Stakeholder engagement was a key theme in the 2019 highlights of the Fellowship Programme.
� Foundation Talent who represent the Fellowship Programme again participated in the Circle of Excellence Conference and strengthened the programme’s partnerships with all University Vice-Chancellors and organisations, such as SACE (South African Council for Educators), Vula Outreach Programme, Fun Learning for Youth, the South African Principals Association, and Kagiso Trust, to name a few.
� The programme’s most recent partnership with the Entrepreneurship Development in Higher Education Programme saw the Foundation partner with the inaugural national Entrepreneurship Intervarsity – an entrepreneurship competition involving each of South Africa’s 26 public universities.
� It was a great delight as well to observe some evidence that our programme participants were indeed developing their entrepreneurial mindset's as each of the four category winners in this competition was a Fellowship Programme Participant and was awarded a trophy as well as a R10 000 prize intended to bolster their businesses.
� Furthermore, a Candidate Fellow, Mvelo Hlophe walked away with the title of 2019 Student Entrepreneur for the best existing business with potential to make ground-breaking social impact; he also received a R50 000 prize.
“ [HOW DID YOU EXPERIENCE THE COE EVENT?] … WHAT A LOVELY
EXPERIENCE! I WAS AMAZED AT THE PROGRAMMES THAT ALLAN GRAY HAS IN PLACE
TO SUPPORT SOUTH AFRICA THROUGH EDUCATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP. ”
(Educator, Free State)
24
GENDER AND RACE DISTRIBUTION
58%female
42%male
455
DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL CANDIDATE FELLOWS 2019455ONBOARDED 2019156GRADUATED 201981EXITED 201935
COHORT 2019SOUTH AFRICAN UNIVERSITIES ATTENDED BY CANDIDATE FELLOWS
HIGHLIGHTS
7 212Applications
received
34Candidate Fellows on the Dual track
programme
EMILE FERRERIA won the MTN award
for the most Innovative Solution
4Each of the
categories won at Entrepreneurship
intervaristy
110
Engage
52New Equip
88Equip
107Explore
84Experience
14
Nelson Mandela University
University of the Free State
University of the Western Cape
Rhodes University
University of JohannesburgStellenbosch
UniversityUniversity of
PretoriaUniversity of the
WitwatersrandUniversity of
Cape Town
6
10
10
14
16
45
54
84
197 Post Programme
77% 11% 8% 3% 1%
Black African
White Coloured Indian Asian
“ [WHAT WAS THE HIGHLIGHT OF THE YEAR FOR YOU?] … THE APPLIED ACTIVITIES WE HAD. FROM THE ENTREPRENEURIAL INITIATIVE GROUPS TO SWEAT. I LEARNT A LOT FROM THESE PROGRAMMES AS A RESULT OF THE HANDS ON APPROACH WE HAD TO TAKE. ”(Year Engage, Female, University of Cape Town, BCom)
25
FELLOWSHIP SELECTIONThe Grade 12 selection campaign commenced on the 9th of January 2019 and concluded later that year on the 8th of December with the close of the Fellowship Selection Camp. The number of schools that were visited exceeded the initial target of 250 schools by a further 138 schools. Of the 156 successful applicants to whom Fellowship offers were made, most came from a very diverse list of 112 schools spread across the country, notably rural and township schools. The completion of a research endeavour regarding entrepreneurial competencies provided the selection department with an opportunity to review and refine selection tools to ensure their validity, reliability and fairness.
Applicants are eligible when they meet the academic benchmark criteria for the Fellowship Programme, which are a level 6 achievement for pure Maths in Grade 12 and an average level 5 achievement across all subjects in Grade 11. Applicants who are already enrolled in university must have achieved a 70% average in their first year of studies. The Fellowship opportunity is open to applicants from South Africa, Botswana, Namibia and Swaziland. All applicants go through a screening process, where their application is reviewed, followed by an interview and, finally, a selection camp. The figures below display the key trends in the 2019 Fellowship selection campaign. More applications were received in the 2019 campaign (considering applicants from both Grade 12 and university) than in 2018 (see Figures 13 and 14).
—388
SCHOOLS VISITED
—156
APPLICANTS SELECTED
FIGURE 13: Applicant throughput of the university campaign for Fellowship selection in 2019
Grade 12 campaign 2018
university campaign 2018
Grade 12 campaign 2019
university campaign 2019
1 209
1 244
1 409
5 804
775
614
749
977
361
183
364
164
211 88202
148
Applications Received Application Assessment Interview Camp
FIGURE 14: Applicant throughput of the Grade 12 campaign for Fellowship selection in 2019
FIGURE 15: Total Applicant throughput of the university and Grade 12 campaign for Fellowship selection in 218 and 2019
TOTAL GRADE 12
TOTAL UNIVERSITY CAMPAIGN
2 556 2018
2 7242019
2 129 2018
7 0932019
26
Most applicants who were offered the Fellowship opportunity, whether in Grade 12 or already at university, hailed from Gauteng, followed by residents from the Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal. Also noteworthy is the fact that the majority of successful applicants identified as female and/or Black African (see Figures 16 and 17).
“ MOST APPLICANTS WHO WERE OFFERED THE FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITY, WHETHER IN GRADE 12 OR ALREADY AT UNIVERSITY, HAILED FROM GAUTENG. ”
FIGURE 16: Race distribution of successful applicants in the 2019 Fellowship selection campaign
Black African Coloured White Indian Asian
Grade 12 campaign 2019
82 10 10 3 0
university campaign 2019
40 5 4 1 1
FIGURE 17: Successful applicants (whether in Grade 12 or already at university), who hailed from Gauteng outnumbered those in other provinces
WESTERN CAPE30
EASTERN CAPE16
FREE STATE6
NORTH WEST3
NORTHERN CAPE1
KWA-ZULU NATAL27
MPUMALANGA5
GAUTENG56
LIMPOPO12
FIGURE 18: Gender distribution of successful applicants in the 2019 Fellowship selection campaign
male female
Grade 12 campaign 2019
32
73
university campaign 2019
19
32
27
28
Candidate Fellow achievements
The Programme Participants in the Fellowship Programme are commonly referred to as Candidate Fellows or CFs. Below is a table outlining their achievements for 2019 by category. The largest category is Notable Entrepreneurial Achievements, which is a clear indication of the CFs’ progression towards significant entrepreneurial action.
TABLE 6: Candidate Fellow achievements in 2019
Achievement Category Achievement
Notable Entrepreneurial Achievements
Namhla Juqu – Won The Pitch @ UCT competition; Dual-Track Candidate Fellow; Validating Penang Shirindza – Category winner at the International Intervarsity Pitch CompetitionMasedi Mathe – Released two songs this year Jessica Mandel – Expanded their Yoga studio and is now employing more instructors; turns over approximately R2mil; Dual-Track Candidate FellowVuyani Langa – Food & Connect turning of his businesses into franchise; Dual-Track Candidate FellowMvelo Hlophe – Social Entrepreneurship ambassador for Red BullMvelo Hlophe & Thandolwethu Hlongwane – Their business Zaio accepted into Injini EdTech Incubator; cohort 3 (8 companies, 1 of 2 South African)Mvelo Hlophe – Grand prize winner at the International Intervarsity Pitch CompetitionStan Shikwambana – Expanded the business Visionary Writers across the South African borders to a few neighbouring marketsLeila Siljeur – Won the inaugural Lion’s Den at Jamboree; not currently a Dual-Track Candidate Fellow, but engagements will be treated as suchGrace Masitha – Won Innovation Award at Jamboree Xabiso Lombo – Social Entrepreneurship ambassador for Red BullDenislav Marinov – Category winner at the International Intervarsity Pitch Competition Musa Maluleke – Category winner at the International Intervarsity Pitch Competition
Exchange Programme Lutholwethu Dabula – TrepCamp
International Leadership Opportunities
Denislav Marinov – Visited to Oxford to contribute to the work being done on developing low-cost medical equipment Lunako Mthenjana – Attended the 2019 Business International Conference in New York to discuss discuss “The New Era of Globalization” with other undergraduates and top business executives
Other Notable achievements
Henry le Roux – Bodyboard SA Pro Competition; placed 4th and won “move of the contest” award (2019)Nthatisi Mota – SA Water Polo team; participated in Korea’s (July 2019) Games and won UFS sportswoman of the year (2019)Phumzile Konile – Wrote an article about the Zeitz MOCAA for DETAIL magazine (an international architecture magazine)Ntobeko Sishi – Permanent host presenter of Youth TV show Hectic9nine on SABC (2019);starred in Signal High, which aired on SABC (2018)
National Achievement
Emile Ferreira – Named developer of the year at the App of the Year awards hosted by MTN; “Bestee” won the category for the most innovative solutionSikholiwe Mdletshe – Qualified for South Africa’s under-21 netball team; captained under-20 national netball team at the Africa Union Sport
The table below outlines the Candidate Fellows who participated in the Entrepreneurship Intervarsity and their respective business ideas.
TABLE 7: Candidate Fellows participating in the Intervarsity Pitch Competition
# Name and Surname Business/Idea
1 Iviwe Mosana Eagle Eye2 Mvelo Hlophe Zaio3 Sinqobile Mashalaba Nisa Finance4 Tsepang Khoboko TAQA5 Xabiso Lombo Guardian Gabriel6 Stan Shikwambana Visionary Writings7 Elijah Djan Nubrix8 Thamsanqa Hoza Hot Nozzle9 Denislav Marinov DVM Designs
10 Cameron Lovemore Eatin11 Thembi Khumalo Sew What Repairs12 Tshegofatso Bogatsu Tsi-Tsi Edible Pacifier13 Bulelani Mbanga Ellipsis14 Edward Moetapele Plug15 Mufunwa Mudzanani Phanda16 Phetha Mchunu Grid Pit
29
30
Fellowship Programme
Candidate Fellow trends
The Fellowship Programme tracks the success of its Candidate Fellows (CFs) and the programme itself according to three key indicators – programme intake, academic and entrepreneurship indicators. Measuring the extent to which Programme Participants are retained in or exited (released) from the programme and measuring the extent to which they are academically and entrepreneurially engaged allow for more nuanced assessments of the Fellowship Programme’s growth and the challenges faced by Programme Participants. What follows is a discussion of the three key indicators.
Programme Intake Indicators
—458
TOTAL NUMBER OF CANDIDATE FELLOWS
September 2019
—3
INTERNATIONAL CANDIDATE FELLOWS
GRADUATEDSeptember 2019
—35
CANDIDATE FELLOWS EXITED FROM THE
PROGRAMMEDid not meet the Fellowship
Programme’s academic requirements for annual renewal
—156
APPLICANTS OFFERED FELLOWSHIP
OPPORTUNITYEnd of 2019
Academic Indicators
—81
GRADUATED IN 2019
—342
PROGRESS TO THE FOLLOWING
YEAR
—83
ACHIEVED 75% & ABOVEFirst Class Pass
60%—
AND ABOVE PASS ATTAINED BY
314
50%—
AND ABOVE PASS ATTAINED BY
320Entrepreneurship IndicatorsDual Track is a programme stream within the Fellowship Programme that allows Candidate Fellows who have businesses to participate in the programme while being fully committed to operating their businesses.
The Fellowship Programme’s academic related requirements are reduced for Dual-Track Candidate Fellows so that they are able to manage their academic, programmatic and business workloads. Moreover, Dual-Track Candidate Fellows participate in a business incubation programme of the Association of Allan Gray Fellows called IVC (Ideation, Validation and Creation).
This is to ensure that they receive the best guidance, advice and mentorship to help grow their businesses. In 2019 there was 34 Dual-Track Candidate Fellows, running 34 businesses.
—34
DUAL-TRACK CANDIDATE FELLOWS
—34
RAN BUSINESSES
31
Candidate Fellow demographics
The demographic profile of the Fellowship Programme in 2019, was similar to that of 2018. South African nationals (94.5%) formed the majority of the cohort, while 77% of all Candidate Fellows identified as Black African and 58% of Candidate Fellows identified as female.
The Fellowship Programme is organised according to the year in which a Candidate Fellow is in their Fellowship Programme journey. This runs parallel to their year of study at university as well as their participation in the programme content for that particular year. The year group categories are as follows: � Year Engage (referring to Candidate Fellows who have been
selected through the Grade 12 campaign and are in their first year of university study),
� Year Equip (referring to Candidate Fellows in their second year of university study, some of whom were selected through the university campaign),
� Year Explore (referring to Candidate Fellows in their third year of university study),
� Year Experience (referring to Candidate Fellows in their fourth year of university study); and
—430
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONALS MAJORITY OF THE COHORT
—58%
CANDIDATE FELLOWS IDENTIFIED AS FEMALE
32
� Post Programme (referring to Candidate Fellows whose degree programmes extend beyond four years). Post-Programme Candidate Fellows usually pursue specialised degree streams, some of which are offered at international partner universities. The name of each year group also reflects the type of personal and entrepreneurial development Candidate Fellows are set to experience that year. In other words, Year Engage Candidate Fellows engage with the topics of personal and entrepreneurial development whereas in their second year, as part of Year Equip, they are equipped with skills and tools to develop themselves further. In their third year, Candidate Fellows begin to explore future career paths and where it might take them. In their fourth year Candidate Fellows consolidate their learning and experiences over the previous years of the programme and begin to chart their futures.
Most Candidate Fellows in 2019 were in the formative year groups – Year Engage and Year Equip – and make up 55% of the total cohort in the Fellowship Programme. This figure is consistent with previous years.
In 2019 the largest cohort of Candidate Fellows according to year group was Year Equip. This year group is separated into New Equip, referring to Candidate Fellows that were newly selected through the university campaign, and Equip, referring to those Candidate Fellows who were selected through the Grade 12 campaign and had progressed from their first year of study. This pattern was consistent with that of previous years.
FIGURE 20: Distribution of Candidate Fellows by year of study at university in 2019
110
140107
84
14 Year Engage Year Equip Year Explore Year Experience Post Programme
As in previous years, Candidate Fellow enrolment at the University of Cape Town exceeded that of other universities. The two other universities that drew the largest number of Candidate Fellows were Wits and the University of Pretoria.
—55%
YEAR ENGAGE AND YEAR EQUIP FELLOWSHIP PROGRAMME
COHORTS
—140
YEAR EQUIP CANDIDATE FELLOWS
—197
CANDIDATE FELLOWS ENROLLED AT THE UNIVERSITY
OF CAPE TOWN
FIGURE 19: Distribution of Candidate Fellows by nationality
Botswana
6
Namibia
15
South Africa
430
Swaziland
4
33
Fellowship Programme attrition The Foundation has maintained a consistent but worrying retention rate of 84% over time. This has been due to the various challenges that our beneficiaries continue to experience. Of the Candidate Fellows who exit the programme, most are in their first or second year, or put differently in Year Engage and Year Equip.
In all cases the Faculties of Commerce, Science and Engineering were the ones with high attrition. More often than not the reasons for attrition are related to mental health challenges, ineffective coping methods, the inability to adjust to the new context and having chosen an unsuitable degree. Most first year students tend to feel overwhelmed by the changes presented by the campus environment. When students become negative for whatever reason, it impacts on their academic achievements.
Psychosocial issues Psychosocial issues continue to grow among Programme Participants. Before the end of the 2019 exams, 65 Candidate Fellows were reported to have experienced, or were still experiencing, some form of psychosocial distress. This accounts for 15% of the entire Fellowship community who are based in South Africa.
Entrepreneurial action Until recently, the Foundation has only assisted Fellows (i.e. those who had already graduated the Fellowship and their degree programmes) with their business ideas through an Association incubation programme called the Ideation, Validation and Creation (IVC) programme.
In 2018, however, a Dual-Track programme was piloted to assist Candidate Fellows who already had businesses. Both the IVC and Dual-Track programmes have been relatively successful to date. In September 2019 a proposal was put forward to the renewals board sub-committee that the Dual-Track programme should be available to any Candidate Fellow who has developed an idea or a business.
This motion was approved. There are currently 34 Dual-Track Candidate Fellows, of whom 16 have been awarded grant allocations of either R50 000, R100 000 or R150 000 from E2 through our programme called, “Varsity Pitch”.
34 34
Theory of Change outcomes
The Fellowship Programme is measured against nine of the ten ToC outcomes. There was a decrease of 2% in the overall Theory of Change index scores for the Fellowship Programme in 2019 compared to previous years. For all but two ToC outcomes, the scores have dropped.
Outcome 7 and 9, which relate to Programme Participants developing improved entrepreneurial mindset, competencies and the ability to work collaboratively, were the highest scoring outcomes.
Outcome 6 and 8, pertaining to the understanding of responsible entrepreneurship and pursuing life-long learning, were among the lowest scoring outcomes.
TABLE 8: Theory of Change index scores for the Fellowship Programme in 2019
Outcome 2015 (n=194) 2016 (n=228) 2017 (n=263) 2018 (n=255) 2019 (n=303)
O2 Beneficiaries have a greater self-awareness and awareness of themselves in relation to others 87% 77% 79% 81% 78%
O3 Beneficiaries achieve academic excellence 52% 51% 49% 49% 50%O4 Beneficiaries value collaboration 72% 71% 63% 65% 64%O5 Beneficiaries value the Allan Gray Orbis Community 87% 87% 86% 87% 79%O6 Beneficiaries understand and value responsible entrepreneurship 40% 68% 39% 41% 39%
O7 Beneficiaries have developed an improved entrepreneurial mindset and competencies 74% 77% 77% 77% 78%
O8 Beneficiaries pursue life-long learning 26% 29% 31% 32% 25%O9 Beneficiaries work collaboratively on entrepreneurial activities 65% 66% 73% 73% 77%
O10 Beneficiaries intent on becoming high-impact responsible entrepreneurs 75% 76% 80% 81% 77%
INDEX 65% 68% 65% 66% 64%
78%
—OUTCOME 2
Greater self-awareness and awareness of themselves in relation to others
79%
—OUTCOME 5
Valuing the Allan Gray Orbis Community
35
Programme experience
Overall, Candidate Fellows had a positive experience of the Fellowship Programme in 2019. While the satisfaction ratings were lower compared to the previous year, it still remained high. Some Candidate Fellows experienced an increase in workload due to the introduction of the online learning platform and its related curriculum. These trends are illustrated in the accompanying figures.
The Fellowship Programme had a Net Promoter Score of 68, which was 16 points lower than the previous year, where the NPS rating for the programme was 84. The decrease in score is due to Candidate Fellows’ increased workload mentioned above. Figure 23 illustrates the NPS rating of various Fellowship Programme events held during the year. In most cases the events were rated above 30, indicating relative satisfaction.
FIGURE 21: Candidate Fellow experience of Fellowship Programme in 2019
CANDIDATE FELLOW
EXPERIENCE 2019
51% good
15% ok
2% terrible
27% wow
6% bad
FIGURE 22: NPS scores of the Fellowship Programme across events in 2019
Jamboree
COE
Selection Camp 1 – Talent
Selection Camp 2 – Talent
Selection Camp 2 – Candidates
YER
73
100
21
46
94
68
FIGURE 23: NPS scores of the Fellowship Programme by year group
Year Engage Year Equip Year Explore Year Experience Post Programme
76 59 64 6077
–100 +100
0
+30–30
+50–50
–70
CANDIDATE ALLAN GRAY
FELLOW RATING 2019
68
Not likely at all
Extremely likely
Neutral
NPS
36
FIGURE 26: Candidate Fellows in Year Equip and Year Engage intent on entrepreneurship
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree
Strongly Agree
0
4
2
8
12
9
28
32
35
34
Year Engage Year Equip
FIGURE 24: Candidate Fellow leadership self-rating
LEADERSHIP SELF RATING
(N=242)
88.97% yes
10.66% unsure
0.37% no
There was a 2% drop in the total number of Candidate Fellows who considered themselves leaders when compared to 2018 results (see Figure 23).
Across year groups, Candidate Fellows exhibited a strong intention to become entrepreneurs within the next seven years (see Figures 24 and 25). This is an indication that the Fellowship Programme’s curriculum and content compels Programme Participants to think about their careers differently. It is also an early indication of the Fellowship Programme’s impact.
In 2019 the aspects of the programme that Candidate Fellows enjoyed were consistent with those indicated by previous cohorts. They included connecting with other Candidate Fellows, interacting with Personal Leadership Programme Officers (PLPOs) and Entrepreneurship Leadership Officers (ELOs), participating in Jamboree, engaging with the online learning platform (OLP) and receiving mentorship. Key sentiments from Candidate Fellows that elaborate on these aspects are quoted below.
FIGURE 25: Candidate Fellows in Year Explore, Year Experience and Post Programme intent on entrepreneurship
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neither Agree or Disagree
Agree Strongly Agree
2 0 0 7 4 2 6 6 0 20 15 2 28 16 1
Year Explore Year Experience Post Programme
37
38
JAMBOREE
“ Jamboree. It opened my eyes to the incredible minds of those around me and truly inspired me. ” CF, Year Engage, YER survey
The national Jamboree has always been a flagship initiative of the Fellowship Programme, but in 2019 the event was opened to not only Candidate Fellows but to Scholars as well as Fellows for the first time in Foundation history. From 5–7 July 2019, the Jamboree became the gathering place for over 800 South African youth in a bid to inspire, educate, connect and engage with one other.
As before, the Jamboree focused on celebrating entrepreneurship. The 2019 theme was “ideas can change the world!” During the three days of Jamboree, Programme Participants considered the African entrepreneurship context, the needs of business clients, and the practicality of going out and doing entrepreneurship. Throughout the weekend Programme Participants had the opportunity to pitch their business ideas and receive input from their peers. Long before the actual Jamboree, participants from all three programmes submitted videos showcasing their business ideas. We received a total of 72 ideation pitches and 15 venture pitches or “Lion’s Den” pitches. The latter are called venture pitches because they are from individuals who are already running a business. Candidate Fellows dominated in both categories: they presented 12 of the final 15 ideation pitches and 7 of the final 10 venture pitches. It was no surprise then that the Jamboree winners of both categories were Candidate Fellows: the ideation pitch was won by a Candidate Fellow from the University of Johannesburg and the Ideation pitch by a Candidate Fellow from Stellenbosch University.
The 2019 Jamboree was rated higher than in 2018, and all the pitching activities were rated in the top five events.
CONNECTING WITH OTHER CANDIDATE FELLOWS
“ Connecting with like-minded people has been of more value to me than I can describe. It has reignited my desire to make a significant difference in the world and leave it a better place than I found it. To be honest, I have always felt like an outlier. Which I something I had come to accept, but in the Fellowship, for the first time, I have felt that you can feel like an outlier but still feel like you belong. There is no feeling quite like it. ” (Dual-Track CF, Year Equip, YER survey)
PLPO AND ELO SUPPORT
“ The sessions with the PLPOs and ELOs as well as the submissions that highlighted the importance of constant awareness of self and reflection. ” (CF, Year Engage, YER survey)
ONLINE LEARNING PLATFORM
“ I enjoyed the modules; on the platform although it was sometimes a bit hectic with all the academic work. ” (CF, Year Equip, YER survey)
MENTORSHIP
“ The mentorship has been the greatest thing. Having a mentor that guides me emotionally and in my career has been amazing. ” CF, Year Experience, YER survey
Mentor recruitment was very successful in 2019. Our initial goal was exceeded and we now have 76 mentors (and counting). 2019 also saw the development of a guide for mentors called the Mentorship Module and the launch of a platform called Everwise.
QUOTE TEXT, QUOTE TEXT, QUOTE TEXT, QUOTE TEXT, QUOTE TEXT,
QUOTE TEXT, QUOTE TEXT.Quote Author
YOU MUST LEARN TO SWALLOW YOUR PRIDE, BE AWARE OF
YOUR LIMITS AND REACH OUT FOR HELP ALONG THE JOURNEY.
Denislav Marinov
FELLOWSHIP IMPACT STORY DENISLAV MARINOV
“A whole new world” the popular theme song of the movie Aladdin pops into a one’s head when the name Denislav Marinov comes up. A modern-day Aladdin, Denislav emerged from his parents’ garage, a fictional mountain cave, jumped onto a magic 3D carpet and began shaping a whole new world.
Eight years ago, while still in high school, Denislav started a 3D printing and design business as a service for family and friends. Denislav’s curiosity and desire to understand the inner workings of the universe led him to pursue a BSc in Physics and Chemistry at the University of Cape Town. He has since graduated and is now working towards a postgraduate degree in Materials Science – a science he says, will revolutionise industry and shape the world of tomorrow.
From its humble beginnings in a garage, his 3D printing and design business has since grown tremendously. Rebranded in 2020 as Amnova Tech, it now services schools and large organisations, and boasts completed projects for institutions such as the University of Oxford and Nescafé. Amnova Tech designs and manufactures its own range of additive manufacturing technologies ranging from educational 3D printers to industrial grade manufacturing machines. They also use their own proprietary tech to offer customisable 3D printing services. They have vertically integrated the entire rapid prototyping process and offer their clients a quick and affordable path to get their products to market.
Denislav’s eyes twinkle when asked about his greatest achievements. No, he’s not thinking about all his feats in business. For Denislav, his greatest achievement is sparking curiosity in the youth.
39
To help a person find their passion and take action is far more rewarding for him than any recognition or honour. During a 3D printing workshop he conducted at his alma mater, St Stithians Boys’ College, he did just that. A student was inspired to design and build his own 3D printer from scratch. That student continues to develop his tech and consistently contributes to the knowledge in this field. Denislav believes that the art of teaching is the art of assisting discovery, which is how he aspires to nurture and encourage future engineers and scientists.
His passion for the community fuels his love of technology. Not only does he want to develop new materials through 3D printing to transform and uplift the community, he also hopes to advance education. The youth is the African continent’s most powerful tool for upliftment, but their power can only be unleashed through quality education that promotes questioning and critical thinking as opposed to submissiveness. African youth are conscious of the current socioeconomic landscape and yet our thinking transcends our immediate surroundings; it has the potential to drive global change.
If Denislav could make a wish like the fictional Aladdin, he would wish away the inequality in our society. As much as technology can empower people and improve their living conditions, it can also widen the inequality gap. He strives to address this issue by democratising technology and using it for social justice. Enter his affordable 3D printing housing programme. Growing up, Denislav witnessed countless families living in substandard conditions, becoming increasingly aware of the immense housing challenge in South Africa. That awareness has turned into a burning desire to end the housing crisis and ensure that every person has a safe, secure and sustainable home to live in. Using his 3D Printing, he has been developing a large format construction system intended to mass produce affordable housing for all.
When asked about leadership and entrepreneurial skills he is quick to answer that everyone has the potential to become a leader and/or an entrepreneur. However, only those whose enterprising spirit is nurtured will eventually succeed. He believes that entrepreneurship is not so much taught as it is untaught. You can learn how to more effectively manage people or solve problems, but the fundamental entrepreneurial drive is deeply ingrained in all of us. He is saddened by the fact that the current societal structure hampers this imaginative spirit, causing many to stray from the path of entrepreneurial discovery, falling – unknowingly – from their magic carpets!
He was fortunate to have grown up in a home where his curiosity and creativity was encouraged. A grateful Denislav also recounts the support of the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation throughout his academic career. The Foundation has equipped me with priceless skills and knowledge to assist me in navigating the complex entrepreneurial landscape. They identified my talents and nurtured them, investing not only money but time to ensure I get the support I need to become a high-impact leader. Being part of the Fellowship Programme has also taught me the value of community and that working in isolation will only get you so far. An often repeated mantra among the Foundation community is this: “If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” You must learn to swallow your pride, be aware of your limits and reach out for help along the journey, says Denislav. Thanks to the Foundation, he has been linked with likeminded individuals who have become friends and confidantes on this entrepreneurial journey.
As long as Denislav stays balanced on his magical 3D carpet and as long as he is supported by likeminded allies, he will continue on his journey to show us dazzling places we never knew, and take us, wonder by wonder, to a whole new world!
40
41
In 2019 the Association of Allan Gray Fellows revised its strategy, using a market segmentation approach. This resulted in tailored interventions for each Fellow profile that emerged from various data analysis and research exercises. There were also considerable efforts to drive up Fellow engagement, address concerns that have been raised by Fellows in the past, and fully understand what factors motivated engagement or disengagement. This section highlights the key trends related to the work carried out by the Association in 2019 as well as the demographics of the Fellow population. Thereafter, it discusses key findings from the YER survey.
The Association is gaining significant momentum. The revised strategy, the five-portfolio offering and adjustments to the messaging (that entrepreneurship is part of a journey) are paying dividends. The results achieved during the year are summarised below.
ASSOCIATIONProgramme
41
42
HIGHLIGHTS
—The refined Ideation, Validation
& Creation (IVC) incubation programme was successfully
launched, which allowed Fellows to engage in venture building at a pace suitable to
each individual’s context.
—The number of participants in the IVC increased by 257%,
from seven Fellows in 2018 to 25 Fellows in 2019.
—The Association recruited and
trained 21 top business coaches to assist with the provision
of the IVC.
—The Nostalgia Campaign,
a marketing initiative conducted by the
Association, was highly successful. The response
rate was significantly higher than previous years. Data were gathered from 267 Fellows (62% of the community), revealing
important insights, especially with regard to the
number of entrepreneurs within the Association.
—The team has developed
strategic partnerships with numerous organisations in the
entrepreneurial ecosystem that have been key to
enabling quality support and development for Fellows, both in their personal capacity but
also in their ventures.
—Findings from the Nostalgia
Campaign show that 132 Fellows (30% of the
community) were engaging in entrepreneurial action and
venture development. This was a significant increase (59%
increase) from the 83 Fellows (21% of the community) who
took action in 2018.
—The total number of Fellows who operated as full-time
entrepreneurs totalled 66 in 2019 (15% of the community).
The comparative figure for 2018 was 42 Fellows. This represents an increase of 24 new full-time
entrepreneurs.
DEMOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
GENDER AND RACE DISTRIBUTION
57%female
43%male
432
GEOGRAPHICAL SPREAD
600+
Jobs created
132
Fellows engageing in entreprneurial activity
25
IVC Entrants 257% growth
from 2018
2
2 Fellow businesses valued at R1 Billion
HIGHLIGHTS
49%211 Gauteng
34%146 Westen cape
9%37 Other SA
4%18
1%3 SADC
4%17
International
No Location
—432
FELLOWS IN THE ASSOCIATION
—132
ENGAGING IN ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTION
—66
FULL-TIME ENTREPRENEURS
—21
TOP BUSINESS COACHES RECRUITED
AND TRAINED61% 15% 12% 10% 2%
Black African
White Indian Coloured Asian
43
Fellow achievements
There were several significant success stories related to Fellow-run ventures this year. Yoco and Go1 continued to be standout ventures, each making a significant impact in their relevant markets. 2019 also saw the largest single investment by E2 into a Fellow business: Suzie Nkambule managed to secure financing for the buy-out deal of Aveng Water in order to become Nafasi Water. 2019 certainly confirmed that momentum was starting to build in the community. Table 9 shows the Fellows that sought funding in 2019 and the outcome of their efforts.
There were also noteworthy achievements made by Fellows in areas outside of venture development. Several of them were nominated, recognised and selected as winners of numerous awards and accolades for their success and impact across many areas of society. The Association is incredibly proud of each of their achievements. Table 10 provides details about the Fellows who received awards, accolades and scholarships from other prestigious organisations.
TABLE 9: Fellow funding obtained in 2019
Funder Amount Fellow
E2 Investment Committee Funding (six deals)
Undisclosed Suzie Nkambule – Nafasi WaterUndisclosed Dineo Lioma & Daniel Ndima – Cape BioUndisclosed Matthew Piper – Khula!Undisclosed Sakhile Mabena – Opulous FinanceUndisclosed Benjamin Shaw – House MeUndisclosed Esethu Cenga – The Rewoven Company
E2
Soft Funding DealsValidation grants (R30k)Creation grants (R60k)Accelerator Equity (R300k)
Validation R30k
Thandeka Xaba – Glam AllyKarabo Thinane – My GradOnkgopotse Khumalo – Mindcast Jennifer Mpho Lebethe – Building BlocDaniel Ndima & Esethu Cenga – Cape Bio
CreationR60k
Thandeka Xaba – Glam AllyMeshack Muluadzi – Kaelo Black BeautyDaniel Ndima & Esethu Cenga – Cape BioSeadimo Tlale – Resilient Entrepreneurs Drive
AcceleratorR300k
Esethu Cenga – The Rewoven CompanyLesedi Kgaka – OccuPi SpaceBlaine Fortuin – Migration Tatoos
Savant CapitalDIAGEO Empowerment Trust Undisclosed Ntandoyenkosi Shezi – Jonga
SA SME Fund Undisclosed Thandeka Xaba – Digital African VenturesDIAGEO Empowerment Trust Undisclosed Prince Nwandeyi – Ispani GroupUndisclosed Undisclosed Lethabo Motsoaledi – Voyc.ai Microsoft Venture Fund (M12) Undisclosed Melvyn Lubega – Go1
44 44
TABLE 10: Fellow accolades awarded in 2019
AWARD FELLOW
Mail & Guardian 200 Young People Thato Mabudusha (Health Sector):https://200youngsouthafricans.co.za/thato-mabudusha-health-2019/Kentse Radebe (Health Sector):https://200youngsouthafricans.co.za/kentse-radebe-health-2019/Dineo Lioma (Business & Entrepreneurship):https://200youngsouthafricans.co.za/dineo-lioma-business-2019/Thato Lufuno Mahosi (Civil Society):https://200youngsouthafricans.co.za/thato lufuno mahosi-civil-2019/
Forbes 3 Under 30 Matthew Piperhttps://www.forbesafrica.com/30-under-30/2019/07/01/30under30-technology-category-2019/
SAICA 35 Under 35 Nkatekp Mathebulahttps://magazine.accountancysa.org.za/publication/?i=606572&Reference_ID=62408447#{%22issue_id%22:606572,%22page%22:68}
Obama Programme Thandeka Xabahttps://www.obama.org/africa/
FirstRand Laurie Dippenaar Scholarship Lonwabo Mgoduso (marked as the top candidate)Studying a master's in engineering at Cambridge University in the UK.
Promotions and Job Movements • Sizwe Nxumalo, Head of Strategy: Vitality Discovery• Danisa Nkuna, Business Development Executive, Discovery• Kihisha Suleman, Customer & Strategy Operations Manager, Uber• Sharon Kunaka, qualified for CA in 2019
45
Fellow demographics and trends
At the start of 2019 49 more Candidate Fellows were inducted as fully-fledged Fellows into the Association of Allan Gray Fellows, representing a 13% increase from the number of Fellows inducted in 2018. This brought the total number of Fellows in the Association to 432; a number made up from 11 graduating classes since 2008.
Our community has grown to 432 members. A community size that exceeds 500 members is expected by March 2020, following Candidate Fellows’ graduation and induction into the Association.
The geographic spread of Fellows is greater than any of the other Programme Participants. Most Fellows still reside in South Africa, with 49% of them residing in Gauteng and 34% living in the Western Cape. However, there is a growing group of Fellows who reside in other parts of the world. At present 9% of Fellows live abroad.
—132
NUMBER OF ENTREPRENEURS IN THE ASSOCIATION
—66
ACTIVELY PURSUING PART-TIME BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES
46
Table 11 gives a breakdown of the Association community by type of career being pursued. The part-time entrepreneur list is made up of Fellows who are either studying or working full-time while developing a venture. The total entrepreneurial conversion rate for the community (i.e. those who are actively engaged in developing a venture) was 30.6% in 2019.
TABLE 11: Distribution of Fellows by employment type
2019 (#) 2019 (%)
Full-time Employed Only 264 61%
Full-time Student Only 36 8.33%
Part-time Entrepreneur 66 15.33%
Full-time Entrepreneur 66 15.33%
Total Fellows 432 100%
As in previous years, the top five employers of Fellows in 2019 were Allan Gray Limited, Deloitte, Bain & Co., Investec, and the First Rand Group. A summary of the top ten employers of Fellows are found in Table 12.
TABLE 12: Top Employers of Fellows
Company 2017 2018 2019
Allan Gray Ltd 10 15 16Deloitte 10 3 12Bain & Co 9 6 12Investec 8 7 11FirstRand Group (RMB, FNB) 5 12 9McKinsey & Co 13 9 9Standard Bank 8 7 9Discovery 5 7 6PwC – 4 6Old Mutual 5 3 6
2019 was an outstanding year for the Association in terms of recorded ventures. With 49 new ventures recorded, the total number of entrepreneurs in the Association now stands at 132 Fellows (30% of the community). In addition to this, the team noted a total of 25 Fellows taking part in the Ideation, Validation and Creation (IVC) programme, a remarkable 257% increase from the number of Fellows that were part of IVC Programme in 2018.
TABLE 13: Distribution of IVC Fellows
Maturity Stage
FT 2018
PT 2018
Total 2018
FT 2019
PT 2 019
Total 2019
New 2019
Ideation 3 6 9 5 19 24 15Validation 13 20 33 25 36 61 28Creation 12 11 23 17 8 25 2
Scale 14 4 18 19 3 22 4Total 42 41 83 66 66 132 49
30.6%
—TOTAL ENTREPRENEURIAL
CONVERSION RATE 2019
15.33% Part-time
Entrepreneur
8.33% Full-time
Student Only
61% Full-time
Employed Only
15.33%Full-time
Entrepreneur
DISTRIBUTION BY EMPLOYMENT
TYPE 2019
47
Entrepreneurial Intent
Adapting the messaging within the Association – that entrepreneurship is part of a journey – seems to have resonated with Fellows. This approach as acknowledges that everyone’s journey is different. The mindset change has been integral to getting more Fellows engaged in their own journeys and this has been a key step on the path to helping Fellows become more entrepreneurial. The strategy for the Association team has been to first get Fellows engaged in community-related events and activities after which the messaging is positioned to develop intent.
The gender breakdown of Fellow entrepreneurs is an important metric that the Association team focused on as we are looking to increase the ratio of women entrepreneurs to reflect the demographics of the Association. The gender breakdown for 2019 showed that of the 132 entrepreneurs in the Association 74 (56%) were male and 58 (44%) were female, despite the fact that the majority of Fellows in the Association were female. The gender breakdown for 2018 was 1% less in each case: 57% male and 43% female. The New Frontiers conference aspires to close this gender gap by encouraging and supporting woman entrepreneurs to join the IVC or embark on their own journeys.
One of the focus areas for the year involved connecting with disengaged Fellows. A number of initiatives were carried out to ensure that the team was able to understand and better address any concerns that may have been causing the Fellows to disengage historically. As a result, community engagement and participation greatly improved in 2019 (see Figure 27).
The increase in engagement in 2019 was enabled by several factors: a revised newsletter, an improved communication strategy, improved messaging, a marketing campaign (Nostalgia Campaign), a range of tailored events and activities relevant to the various Fellows’ contexts, and the introduction of the new portfolio offerings. Several Fellows highlighted that the new value proposition was a compelling reason for them to become and stay engaged with the Association, something that they did not feel existed before.
FIGURE 26: Gender Distribution of Association Entrepreneurs
132entrepreneurs
44%female
56%male
“ [VALUE DERIVED FROM ATTENDING THE ASSOCIATION
IMBIZO EVENT] … LEVERAGE NETWORK FOR MARKET
ACCESS + DEALS + SUPPORT IN ENTREPRENEURIAL
JOURNEY. ”(Fellow, 2016 Induction Cohort)
48
FIGURE 27: Pipeline of Fellow engagement
—414
—325
—215
—130
Baseline Engagement�
Intermediate Engagement�
Advanced Engagement�
Fellow Entrepreneur
�
Opened NewsletterOr
Contacted via Phone
OrResponded to Survey
Baseline Engagement And
Attended an EventOr
Interacted on FacebookOr
Attended One-on-one Meeting
Intermediate Engagement
AndMember of a Forum
OrIn Active Service for
AssociationOr
Fellow Entrepreneur
Attended IVCOr
Running a BusinessOr
Providing Employment
96%
—BASELINE
Up from 91% in 2018
75%
—INTERMEDIATE
Up from 50% in 2018
50%
—ADVANCED
Up from 33%in 2018
30%
—ENTREPRENEUR
Up from 14%in 2018
As can be seen from Figure 27 and Table 14, the majority of Fellows had two contact points with the Association in 2019: attendance at an event and engaging with the newsletter. There were instances were Fellows attended more than one event, but attending more than three events was rare. Fellows’ selectiveness with regard to frequency of engagement reflects their individual time constraints and also what they find appealing.
TABLE 14: Fellow engagement in 2019
Events # Engaged (Survey & Newsletter incl.) % # Engaged (Survey &
Newsletter incl.) %
0 Events 18 4% 137 32%1 or more Events 414 96% 295 68%2 or more Events 311 72% 192 44%3 or more Events 208 48% 129 30%4 or more Events 152 35% 86 20%5 or more Events 101 23% 57 13%
4949
Theory of Change outcomes
The Association Programme is measured against Outcomes 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10. In 2019 there were many initiatives aimed at collecting data from Fellows to understand their programme experience. Many of these efforts overlapped with each other. As a result, Fellows experienced research fatigue, which led to a lower YER survey response rate than the previous year. Nonetheless, the overall ToC index scores were higher compared to the previous year.
The two highest outcome scores were related to entrepreneurship development. Outcome 6: Programme Participants value and understand responsible entrepreneurship; and Outcome 10: Programme Participants intend to become high-impact responsible entrepreneurs. The two lowest-scoring outcomes were Outcome 5: Programme Participants value the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation community; and Outcome 8: Programme Participants pursue life-long learning (see Figure 28 and Table 15).
85.5%
—OUTCOME 10
Programme Participants intend to become high impact responsible entrepreneurs
84.8%
—OUTCOME 6
Programme Participants understand and value responsible entrepreneurship
FIGURE 28: Theory of Change Index Scores for the Association of Allan Gray Fellows
2015 (n=?)
2016 (n=89)
2017 (n=136)
2018 (n=134)
2019 (n=15)
71%
74%
63.8%
67.2%
74.6%
TABLE 15: Theory of Change Index Scores for the Association of Allan Gray Fellows
Outcome 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
O4: Programme Participants value collaboration 68% 69% 64.2% 69.8% 65.0% (down from previous year)
O5: Programme Participants value the Allan Gray Orbis community 81% 76% 67.0% 66.2% 63.3% (down from previous year)
O6: Programme Participants understand and value responsible entrepreneurship 66% 78% 62.9% 69.9% 84.8% (down from previous year)
O7: Programme Participants have developed improved entrepreneurial mindset and competencies 77% 79% 74.0% 74.8% 74.4%
(down from previous year)
O8: Programme Participants pursue life- long learning 89% 89% 66.9% 70.9% 65.0% (down from previous year)
O10: Programme Participants intend to become high impact responsible entrepreneurs 54% 60% 50.2% 54.9% 85.5% (up from previous year)
50
Programme experience
The Association had a lower Net Promoter Score (NPS) score in 2019 than in previous years (see Figure 29). In comparison, the Fellowship Programme was rated higher than the Association but the NPS score for the Fellowship Programme was nonetheless lower than previous years. It should be noted, however, that these scores are reflective of only a subsample of the total Fellow population.
FIGURE 29: Net Promoter Score of the Association of Allan Gray Fellows
Fellowship Programme Association of Allan Gray Fellows
NPS 2016 NPS 2017 NPS 2018 NPS 2019
80% 47% 80% 44% 82% 64% 80% 53%
–100 +100
0
+30
+50
–30
+70
–50
–70
FELLOWS NPS FOR
FELLOWSHIP
80
Not likely at all
Extremely likely
Neutral
NPS
53
–100 +100
0
+30
+50
–30
–50
–70
FELLOWS NPS FOR
ASSOCIATION
Not likely at all
Extremely likely
Neutral
NPS
51
MY GOAL IS TO INVEST IN COMPANIES SO EXCITING THEY KEEP ME UP AT NIGHT,
OR TO INVEST IN BUSINESSES I WISH I HAD STARTED.
Melvyn Lubega
ASSOCIATION IMPACTMELVYN LUBEGA
Entrepreneurship: A way of viewing the worldAs a kid, Melvyn Lubega was always on the lookout for opportunities to make some money, whether that meant watering the garden or selling toasted sandwiches to hungry school friends after the tuckshop had closed. That entrepreneurship is in his blood is indisputable – but, says the director of Go1, there’s no doubt that his time with the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation honed this innate quality.
Melvyn still has a notebook dating from his time as a participant in AGOF’s Fellowship programme. On its cover is written the quote, “There are none so blind as those who do not see” – a saying which summarises how Melvyn feels about entrepreneurship. “It’s one thing to be a business owner, but quite another to have the ability to view your world through an entrepreneurial lens, which enables you to find opportunities and solutions to challenges,” he explains.
Melvyn’s parents created the foundation for his entrepreneurial leanings – he reveals that his father was a medical doctor who also owned businesses such as a butchery and food takeaway. “He had three doctorates, but he was always looking for the next thing,” Melvyn recalls. Meanwhile, his mother – who, like his dad, hailed from Uganda – had earned a scholarship to study, and it was from her that he learned the value of hard work and education, which he still regards as the most valuable tool for changing your circumstances.
This is a philosophy he put into practice in his own life: when he joined St John’s College as part of AGOF’s Scholarship programme, he made sure he excelled on the sports field and the cultural arena, and was appointed head boy in his final year. From there, he went on to study actuarial science at the University of Cape Town.
52
This was where the first small seed for Go1 was planted, after Melvyn set up a small investment club with some friends. The club started focusing on small businesses after several members gained employment at large corporates, making for a potential conflict of interest when it came to investing in listed companies. “Speaking to various entrepreneurs, I realized that many faced a common challenge: they couldn’t find the right people for their business.” This was not the time to act on the insight, however. First, Melvyn spent time at Goldman Sachs; then he was appointed the first associate of the Boston Consulting group in sub-Saharan Africa. Again, he was alerted to pitfalls experienced by companies in the area of human capital: “I found that many of our clients, all of which were large multinationals, could have done more to improve their companies by providing better training for their staff. Instead, they had to try fix the problems that arose in the absence of such training.” Simply put, the small players didn’t have the money to get human capital right, but the big players weren’t succeeding here, either.
It was after Melvyn went to Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar to complete a double Masters in public policy, education learning and technology that he took the first step towards establishing Go1. Occupied as he was with questions of how technology can be harnessed to unlock human capital development, it was fortuitous to meet Andrew Barnes, an Australian student who was similarly fascinated by the learning and development space. He also had the technology competencies to complement Melvyn’s experience in the field.
The duo joined Y Combinator, the same incubator to have nurtured Air BnB – “so we were privileged to learn from some of the greats; real legends in the technology space.”
Go21 was launched in 2015, and grew by 20% month on month for two years. After bringing on board some investment capital, and then institutional investors (including Sale Force, the first company to invest in Amazon, and Microsoft), raising a total of 40 million pounds.
53
Melvyn attributes the company’s rapid ascendance to the founders’ mindset, which allowed them to address problems as they were identified. For example, one of the biggest challenges he initially encountered was clients’ perception of Go1 in its earliest iteration as a highly efficient platform – but one hampered by a lack of content.
“The company was like a bookshelf – but no one buys a bookshelf without books”. This made the team realise the need to introduce content to augment the learning management system, prompting them to evolve Go1 into what Melvyn describes as “the world’s largest corporate training marketplace”; a platform not dissimilar to Netflix in that a multitude of resources are available in a single ecosystem. Go1 Premium, as this aggregated marketplace is known, now accounts for 90% of the company’s revenue. Melvyn reports that the company will continue to develop and improve its offering, always seeking to live its aim of helping people fulfil their potential through learning.
At the same time, he is interested in applying his entrepreneurial mindset to solve other problems, again leveraging technology. “My goal is to invest in companies so exciting they keep me up at night, or to invest in businesses I wish I had started,” he says.
His time with AGOF was invaluable not only because it brought to the fore the entrepreneurial flair he was so eager to express and explore, but also because it granted access to a community that remains an important part of his life. In fact, says Melvyn, some of his closest friends today are people he met at the selection camp he attended back n Grade 11. “That speaks to the richness of the connections I’ve made through AGOF,” he says, adding that perhaps the most important part of becoming a member of the Foundation is that he was able to join a community where entrepreneurship is something that’s taken for granted, rather than a rarity.
“When I finished my undergraduate degree, people assumed that if you wanted to start a business, it was because you hadn’t been able to land a job in corporate. People would try to dissuade you from what they saw as a big mistake. Here, entrepreneurship is not a black swan event; it’s the way you look at the world. I wouldn’t have been able to develop my skills without this community.”
54
ENTREPRENEURIALEducation
Entrepreneurial education is a function that deals with the development of the various programmes’ curricula and assessments. A new team was formed in 2019 and tasked with integrating the curriculum and assessment of each programme into the broader programme operating structure. During this time an online learning platform was launched and a research project was conducted by the University of Pretoria. The completion of the Success Profile research project helped the Foundation uncover and understand the developmental trajectories of its Programme Participants. Below are some of the highlights that pertain to how this function has been set up and has evolved.
55
HIGHLIGHTS
—The new Allan Gray Orbis
Foundation online campus was launched and made available to all Scholarship and Fellowship
Programme Participants.
—An entrepreneurship curriculum
was launched, carefully designed to elevate the way
that both entrepreneurial mindset and skillsets
are imparted.
—A mobile app was developed and launched for the online
campus to enable Programme Participants to access the online learning platform on
their mobile devices.
—The first set of online content modules were developed to launch this curriculum and
Programme Participants started to engage with this content. Positive application of the
content in the real world was reported in the feedback.
—The Success Profile, made up of 14 entrepreneurial
competencies, was researched and communicated throughout the Foundation. This will enable
us to measure behavioural shifts against these
competencies through the new selection and assessment tools
we develop in 2020.
—Rubrics and assessments
were developed to accurately track and measure Programme
Participants through a points system.
—AGOF 2019 Annual Report: Curriculum Development 2
—A new Director for
Entrepreneurship Education was appointed in order to align the strategic direction of the curriculum, the content and selection starting from 2020
across functions.
Another aim of filling this position is to see that the current content is elevated to ensure greater impact with regard to foundational strategic objectives and greater combined Afrocentric, and 4IR impact of businesses and initiatives created by Programme Participants. A new Director for Entrepreneurship Education was appointed to align the curriculum and assessment requirements as well as the delivery approach with each Foundation programme’s development approach. In the past this department and role did not exist, which meant that the operationalisation of curriculum and assessment practices were dependent on the programmes reaching out (and vice versa) to the specialists outside of the broader programme team for assistance; this often led to implementation gaps.
56
Elevated entrepreneurship education strategy
Work is being done to elevate the curriculum and content from an online learning platform to strategic Entrepreneurship Education for the entire Foundation. This new strategy aligns the activities of the functions that make up the Foundation’s ecosystem, including the Association, Fellowship, Scholarship, AGEC, Selection and the external ecosystem partners. This will in turn enable the ecosystem to function at an improved level to the benefit of Programme Participants with direct impact on strategic measurables for the Foundation.
A new cohesive strategy sees the focus being shifted to the Programme Participant’s lifelong journey with the Foundation. A journey may include one or more of the following: a for-profit business, a not-for-profit business, a leadership role in an organisation or a community, or a specialist role in society. These can in turn branch in sub-journeys such as industry specific journeys. All journeys incorporate entrepreneurship mindset, skillset and application skills. This is because 21st century skills are the same as entrepreneurship skills.
All content, whether current, new or sourced, is categorised under one of three categories:1. Developmental Mindset2. Developmental Skillset3. Application (currently in the form of IVC – Ideate/Validate/Create).
The goal is for IVC to becoming one branded process for the Programme Participants.
In order to execute the new strategy, co-creation teams have been introduced. These include subject matter experts, content delivery specialists, Programme Participants themselves and foundation team members. These new skills need to be practiced at the foundation, in order to teach these skills. Collaboration and co-creation are important 21st century skills.
The Entrepreneurship Competencies researched by the selection team will be used to measure behavioural shifts at specific points over the course of a Programme Participant’s learning and application journey.
The idea is to develop an “AGOF way” of creating and delivering content so that a standardised level of quality is ensured.
57
The Allan Gray Entrepreneurship Challenge (AGEC) is a gamified experiential learning process aiming to develop entrepreneurial mindsets in secondary school learners, delivered via an online application. The game uses action-oriented micro-challenges as a fun and engaging learning tool – students immediately apply areas of entrepreneurial mindset to real world scenarios, and through repeated application of the concepts, deeply embed the entrepreneurial mindsets that the game seeks to develop. With the primary goal of embedding ownership of the game as well as strategic and operational management of the game into the fabric of the Foundation’s portfolio, the AGEC has retained its lean structure. The long-term goal is to achieve strong performance, strong growth in its user-base and the establishment of strategic partnerships with national and provincial governments. Registration for the AGEC opened on Friday, 2 August 2019, and gameplay commenced as scheduled on Monday, 2 September 2019. The game was played over five weeks and ended on Friday, 4 October 2019. The AGEC was able to reach more learners than it was able to in 2018. Moreover, during this period the challenge was reviewed in order to inform future strategy. Below are some of the highlights of the as well as a summary of the challenge’s reach over time (see Figure 30).
ALLAN GRAY Entrepreneurial Challenge
58
Highlights
� The 2019 AGEC attracted 14 959 learners, which represents an 81% increase from the previous year.
� The number of schools registered this time around was 618.� The total number of teachers who registered in support of the
learners was 1 259 in 2019.� There was unprecedented growth in the challenge’s inclusivity
quotient: a high proportion (27%) of learners from disadvantaged schools featured among the top 11 performers, with the top performer being from the Eastern Cape.
� A provincial MEC of Education promoted the AGEC for the first time in 2019.
� Another first was the written endorsement of the AGEC directly from the Director General of the Department of Basic Education, opening channels of engagement with each of the nine provincial Heads of Department of Education across South Africa.
� This year’s content strategy was robust: 60% of the topics covered in the AGEC were directly aligned to the UN Sustainable Development Goals for South Africa.
� An appetite for actual entrepreneurship was stimulated among learners via the AGEC’s business pitch challenge, which saw the winner receiving investment for an actual startup venture.
FIGURE 30: Number of Schools and Learners participating in the Allan Gray Entrepreneurial Challenge
Learner registrations
* In 2019, there were 1 259 teachers from all 9 provinces involved (unprecedented)** Total number of schools represented by the collective body of learners in the given year
Schools with registrations**
14 959 8 252 4 431 618 628 161
2019 2018 2017
81% Increase
—14 959
LEARNERS ATTRACTED BY AGEC IN 2019
—618
SCHOOLS REGISTERED
—1 259
TEACHERS REGISTERED
—27%
TOP 11 PERFORMERS FROM DISADVANTAGED SCHOOLS
5959
GROWTH GOALS
FOR 2020—
The HoD/MEC of Education in each of the nine provinces will
be engaged
—Host two additional information
sessions by including developing communities in Limpopo and Mpumalanga
—An official Memorandum of
Agreement will be signed with the DG of the DBE to solidify government’s participation in
the outreach and expansionary efforts of the Programme
—Create personalised
gaming experiences for the beneficiaries of the
Scholarship, Fellowship and Association Programmes to
promote inclusivity
—The product development
strategy will retain optimisation of user-experience as a key
focus for maximal retention of learners, year upon year from
2020 onwards
—AGEC Primary will be launched as a pilot Programme in Gauteng province primarily
focusing on the development of an entrepreneurial mindset amongst young learners
(target audience 9–12 years old)
—The project management segment
will witness the Programme leading the development of a fully integrated product to be used for deployment of AGEC in the very long-
term horizon of the game.
60
THE FOUNDATION in 2019
Our team
In 2019 the Talent who formed part of the Foundation team numbered 85. Fewer Talent exited the organisation in 2019 compared to previous years. There were 14 new hires and 7 promotions (see Figure 32). The Net Promoter Score for the Foundation as rated by Talent was 46 (which reflects a positive organisational culture).
Talent demographics point to more female than male Talent, and this is consistent across both offices. Moreover, more staff members are located in the Cape Town office than in the Johannesburg office (see Figures 31 and 33).
This is displayed in the accompanying figures below.
61
FIGURE 32: Talent composition and movement in 2019
Total promotions
Total new hires
Total exits/resignations
Total Talent 85
6
14
7
FIGURE 33: Distribution of Talent by region and gender
Cape Town
Johannesburg
23
35
10
17
Males Females
FIGURE 31: Gender distribution of Talent in 2019
61%female
39%male
2019 ORGANISATIONAL STRATEGIC INITIATIVES PER FUNCTION
S1 01 S1 02 S1 03 S1 04PROGRAMMES PROGRAMMES FINANCE TALENTBuild Academic GPS Create and Entrepreneurship GPS Implement a continuous
improvementprojectDevelop and implement Talent
Development Framework
S1 05 S1 06 S1 07 S1 08IMPACT ASSURANCE IMPACT ASSURANCE PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND
COMMUNICATIONSIMPACT ASSURANCE
External Evaluation Phase 1 – Data Strategy Create a Digital Strategy Protection of Personal Information Act (POPI) Response
62
The racial breakdown of the Foundation is also representative across all race groups, and different levels within the organisation. The table below shows the breakdown of Talent according to job type and race.
TABLE 16: Race distribution of Talent according to job type
Diversity/Occupational Level Black African Coloured Indian White Foreign
National
Top Management (Exco) 4 2 1 0 0Senior Management Directors) 1 1 0 2 0Professionally Qualified, Experienced Specialists, Middle Management 9 9 3 4 0Skilled Technical and Academically Qualified, Junior Management 19 5 0 5 0Semi-skilled and Discretionary Decision Making 13 2 1 0 0Unskilled and Defined Decision Making 3 1 0 0 0
FIGURE 34: Total spend per Programme in 2019
SPEND BY PROGRAMME
69% Fellowship
27% Scholarship
4% Association
FIGURE 35: Spend by programme activity
SPEND BY ACTIVITY
82% Academic
13% Programme
5% Selection
—85
FOUNDATION TALENT TEAM MEMBERS
—14
NEW HIRES
—7
PROMOTIONS
Our investment
The biggest portion of the programme budget in 2019 was dedicated to academic fees, which was consistent with previous years’ reported spend.
63
Embracing a world of change
In 1665, Isaac Newton was sent home from Trinity College at Cambridge to take shelter from the advancing plague. During this time, he worked on theories that later developed into calculus, optics and, of course, gravity.
Three and a half centuries later, we can relate to the tension and uncertainty of his time. We’ve also seen similar innovation emerge from our own time of crisis. While the world is grappling with the Coronavirus pandemic and lockdown, a number of new inventions have been launched, certain to change the way we live, from buffs coated with a virus-killing substance to dining pods, from see-through masks to hands-free door handles.
We believe it is only a matter of time until the ingenuity of our own Fellow entrepreneurs result in innovations that take their place beside these game changers. In fact, we have already started to see the contributions of our high impact entrepreneurial leaders as they find opportunities to create value for response efforts and the much-touted “new normal”. As trying as these times are, our programme participants have a natural advantage: the uncertainty that has become a part of daily life is a part of the entrepreneur’s natural condition. Entrepreneurs are accustomed to operating in an environment populated with unknowns; comfortable with taking decisions based on calculated risk and propelled to action while others may hesitate.
CONCLUSION64
AGOF is confident that it has equipped its programme participants with the mindset to meet the need that has arisen from the current global conditions. And while we have been empowering our participants with skills on how to ask questions that uncover and develop opportunities, we have been asking ourselves some important questions too. Guided by our 2020 theme of Achieving Growth in Lean Environments (AGILE), we have reviewed how we work and refined our processes so that we are able to amplify our impact; and enhanced our programmes so that we can be sure that our participants have what they need to leave a lasting legacy in the country.
Our revised way of working includes the introduction of customized entrepreneurial development journeys, ensuring that each participant’s engagement with the programme is both meaningful and relevant.
We are also implementing a digital strategy, a significant step towards achieving digital transformation in order to ensure that we leverage the power of technology for scale, for efficiency and for impact. Remarkable in its depth, the strategy will be phased in as we build on what we have already achieved in this area. Importantly we will work towards integrating technologies to create a seamless, more efficient user experience that is customised to the needs of our programme participants.
“ AGOF IS CONFIDENT THAT IT HAS EQUIPPED ITS PROGRAMME PARTICIPANTS WITH THE MINDSET TO MEET THE NEED THAT HAS ARISEN FROM THE CURRENT GLOBAL CONDITIONS. ”
65
Our efforts in this regard are supported by a hard-hitting data strategy which enables us to measure our impact accurately. This entails clarity on why and how data comes in to ensure we are focused on what purpose it will serve. It also means that the decisions we make regarding future strategies and best practice are based on clean, validated data which allows us to predict and forecast future impact – making for the best possible result. How we analyse and disseminate that data is equally important and our POPIA compliance project has resulted in a framework that guides us.
Much attention has been paid to ensuring that we have the systems, tools and intelligence in place to accelerate the drive towards our important mission. However, we have invested much more into our people – from ensuring our Talent are supported and developed, to creating meaningful partnerships within the ecosystem and to staying connected to our community of programme participants.
We believe that this combination will be instrumental in helping us reach our ultimate goal: shaping a pool of responsible, high impact entrepreneurs with a strong spirit of significance – or, as AGOF Fellow and developer of the Phanda app, Mufunwa Mudzanani, puts it, “people who are able to see the solution within the problem”.
This is the mindset that has, and will continue, to distinguish AGOF programme participants. It is also what will see them ignite the entrepreneurial leadership of those around them, setting in place a chain reaction which has the potential to change our country, and even the world.
It has been a pleasure and a privilege to be able to work with so many young dynamic changemakers during the past year. Young people who envision a new and different South Africa and who will find many ways of helping build it. May we continue to see even more of them rising to the challenge and the opportunity – and may we continue to find the best ways to help them as and when they do.
66
GLOSSARY4IR Fourth Industrial Revolution
AGEC Allan Gray Entrepreneurial Challenge
AGOF Allan Gray Orbis Foundation
CEO Chief Executive Officer
DFI Development Finance Institute
ELO Entrepreneurship Leadership Officer
Function This term is commonly used in the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation to refer to a specific department.
GBV Gender-based violence
GEI Global Entrepreneurship Indicator
IVC Ideation, Validation and Creation Programme
Ideation: Fellows in the Ideation category have a problem they want to solve or an opportunity they wish to pursue. Typically, the companies are not yet registered, the solution, product or service is not clearly defined, and market research has been predominately desk bound.
Validation: The Validation category is for Fellows who are actively looking for product-market fit. Fellows would be engaging in customer discovery, customer development and or have a prototype or MVP of their product in the market. They could be post revenue, but normally pre-breakeven.
Creation: Businesses in the creation category, have product-market fit to some degree. A clear indication of this is repeat customers and month-on-month growth. The focus on this stage should be on growth, company building and governance. Usually, companies at this stage would be applying to Accelerators or Seed funding.
Scale: At this stage companies are established and have been in business for over 2–3 years. They would be growing quickly and close to either breakeven or profitability. At this stage companies have raised previous rounds of funding and are looking to raise Series A or B funding.
OLP Online Learning Platform
NPS Net Promoter Score. A Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a commonly used metric to gauge customer satisfaction and engagement (Satmetrix, 2017). This helps predict customer behaviour and sentiment towards a service offering or product. It is a score selected by a survey respondent on a scale of 0–10 (1-not likely at all to 10-highly likely/extremely likely). Scores are grouped together into three categories of response types. Those are namely: Promoters (scores of 9 and 10, are highly satisfied and are likely to promote or encourage others to the service/product). Passives (7 and 8, are likely to be swayed by another more compelling offering) and are satisfied but not entirely enthusiastic about the product/service. Lastly, Detractors (respondents that select a score between 0 and 6), are unhappy with a service/product and are likely to damage your brand through word of mouth. Survey scores over 30 are generally considered to be good (Orencia, 2017). Moreover, scores above 50 are regarded as being excellent, and scores about 70 are considered to be world-class.
PC Personal computer
PLPO Personal Leadership Programme Officer
SDO Scholar Development Officer
SSA Sub-Saharan Africa
TEA Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity. TEA is defined as the percentage of the 18–64 year-old population who are either entrepreneurs or owner-managers of a new business (GEM, 2018).
ToC Theory of Change
UCT University of Cape Town
UP University of Pretoria
Wits University of the Witwatersrand
YER year-end review
67
REFERENCESÁcs, Z. J., Szerb, L., Lafuente, E., & Márkus, G. 2019. Global
Entrepreneurship Index: 2019. The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute, Washington, D.C. Available at: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17692.64641
Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs (ANDE). 2017. South Africa’s entrepreneurial ecosystem map. South Africa Chapter, Johannesburg. Available at: https://assets.aspeninstitute.org/content/uploads/files/content/upload/ANDE%20ENTREPRENEUR%20ECOSYSTEM%20MAP%202015.pdf
Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute (GEDI). 2020. Global Entrepreneurship Index. Washington, DC. Available at: https://thegedi.org/global-entrepreneurship-and-development-index/
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). 2018. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Global Report 2017/2018. Available at: https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2017-2018-global-report
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM). 2019. Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Attitudes: South Africa profile. Available at: https://www.gemconsortium.org/economy-profiles/south-africa
Knoema. 2019. World Rankings: South Africa Global Entrepreneurship Index. Available at: https://knoema.com/atlas/South-Africa/topics/World-Rankings/World-Rankings/Global-entrepreneurship-index
SAB Foundation and Allan Gray Orbis Foundation (SABF & AGOF). 2017. The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem of South Africa: A Strategy for Global Leadership 2017. Available at: https://sabcms.blob.core.windows.net/wp-content/2017/03/GEDI-South-Africa-Analysis2.pdf
Statistics South Africa. 2019. Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Quarter 4: 2019. Statistical Release PO211. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa. Available at: http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0211/P02114thQuarter2019.pdf
Valerio, A., Parton, B., & Robb, A. 2014. Entrepreneurship Education and Training Programs Around the World: Dimensions for Success. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0202-7
World Bank. 2020. Doing Business 2020 Economy Profile: South Africa. Available at: https://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/country/s/south-africa/ZAF.pdf
68