2019-2024 - Live Healthy Napa County€¦ · is also a lens through which the collaborative can...
Transcript of 2019-2024 - Live Healthy Napa County€¦ · is also a lens through which the collaborative can...
1
2019-2024 Napa County
Community Health Improvement Plan A Napa County Public Health publication based on collaboration with Live Healthy Napa County community partners and our local community.
2
Our Vision for a Livable Napa County
A livable Napa County will be diverse, inclusive, equitable, and safe for
community members across cultures and generations. It will have
affordable and appropriate housing, multiple transportation options,
and supportive community features and services. Once in place, these
resources will enhance both personal independence and
interdependence, effectively engaging residents in the area’s civic,
economic, and social life.
Livable Communities Framework
3
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Community Health Improvement Plan - Development Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Population Health Goals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Priority 1: Respect and Social Inclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Priority 2: Food Insecurity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Priority 3: Housing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Priority 4: Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4
5
Introduction
Live Healthy Napa County (LHNC) is a unique public-private partnership focused on realizing a shared
vision of a healthier Napa County. LHNC members include representatives from healthcare
organizations, non-profit and social services organizations, education, local government – including
cities and county departments, transportation-focused organizations, local funders, and the community
at large. Napa County Public Health is the backbone organization for LHNC and provides technical and
administrative support, including leading the development of the Community Health Assessment (CHA)
and Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP).
In addition to Live Healthy Napa County, Napa has several initiatives that are working to address social
determinants of health (SDoH). These groups include the Community Leaders Coalition, the Child Abuse
Prevention Council, the Citizenship Legal Services Initiative, the Healthy Aging Population Initiative
(HAPI), Resilient Napa, and the First 5 Napa Network, among others. There is substantial overlap
between membership in these initiatives and membership in LHNC and this CHIP reflects our shared
commitment to improving health equity in Napa County.
Live Healthy Napa County partners, through the 2018 CHA process facilitated by Napa County Public Health, identified four priority areas. These areas are directly from, or are related to, the Livable Communities framework. The Livable Communities1 framework was adapted from the World Health Organization and American Association of Retired Persons’ Age-Friendly Communities models, which outline eight domains of community life affecting health and well-being. These areas also align with several of the priorities identified by community members during the County of Napa’s Strategic Planning process.
Respect and Social Inclusion
Food Insecurity
Housing
Transportation
The purpose of a CHIP is to outline a long-term, systematic effort to improve the health of a community. In Napa County, we will strive to have CHIP strategies and proposed solutions be community-driven and designed with Napa County Public Health staff as support and LHNC partners providing direction and leadership. While there are multiple goals and objectives within each of the identified priority areas, in order for the process to be community driven, we will focus our efforts on a smaller number of impactful strategies and activities in order to maintain capacity to do the work. Each of the four priority areas within the CHIP has or will have goals, objectives, and strategies. Goals are broad measures that are tied to long-term outcomes and reflect changes in population health or community conditions. Objectives are mid-range outcomes and processes that will help achieve the goals. In addition to reflecting meaningful change within the priority areas, the goals and objectives were selected based on the availability of population level data that can be used to measure change over time. Strategies encompass the different specific activities undertaken by partners and community members; strategies help to achieve the objectives and will have short-term measurable outcomes.
1 Livable Communities framework, showing eight domains that address social determinants of health. Source: http://msaphase.org/theme/age-friendly-cities/ Accessed November 26, 2018.
6
Since the completion of the first Napa County CHA and CHIP in 2013/2014, LHNC has increasingly
focused on addressing social determinants of health to decrease health inequities among Napa County
residents. Access to (and quality of) medical care and personal health behaviors, such as alcohol and
tobacco use, play a role in determining the length and quality of our life. However, the social
determinants of health, including economic, social, physical, and environmental factors, are the
strongest predictors of morbidity and mortality. Health inequities are systematic differences in the
opportunities that groups have to achieve optimal health, leading to unfair and avoidable differences in
health outcomes. According to The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Health
inequity is costly for the United States with respect to health care expenditures, security, economic
productivity and business viability2.” For these reasons, strategies in the 2019 CHIP focus on the social
determinants of health in order to achieve a longer-term impact on health outcomes and improve
health equity.
Community Health Improvement Plan - Development Process
The Community Health Improvement Plan was developed over a series of four meetings with
community partners that led to the adopted framework:
Meeting 1: February 2019, prioritization of issues identified in the Community Health Assessment; identification of underrepresented population groups.
Meeting 2: May 2019, measures for CHIP goals and objectives proposed; asset based community development exercise.
Meeting 3: August 2019, Open Space Technology used to identify populations and topic areas for development of strategies within the CHIP.
Meeting 4: November 2019, subcommittee established for final review of CHIP; further development of action items after review of results from learning conversations with community members.
The Livable Communities portion of the Community Health Assessment was launched in May of 2018
and published in early January 2019. Quantitative and qualitative data was collected and reviewed for
each of the eight domains within the Livable Communities framework. Forty community stakeholders
identified Respect and Social Inclusion, Housing, and Transportation as domains needing the most
improvement in Napa County. Food insecurity was also identified as an area for improvement through
the 2018 Emergency Food System Study, which included collection of survey data (n=351) and focus
group data (three groups, n=31) from community residents.
Our first LHNC meeting of 2019, on February 11, kicked off the Community Health Improvement
Planning process. LHNC members were asked to prioritize which of the priority areas from the
Community Health Assessment to focus on first. Prioritization was based on the following questions:
How many people are impacted?
Are some groups of people impacted more than others?
2 http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=24624
7
What is the volume of work happening already (e.g. are other groups already focused in a
particular area?)?
Do local organizations have capacity and resource availability to address the health factor?
After identifying Respect and Social Inclusion (RSI) as the most urgent priority, coalition members were
then asked to identify the groups in Napa County experiencing the most challenges related to this issue.
Each group shared out their top three most critical groups, and then coalition members collectively
voted for their top choices. Mixed status immigrant households, people living in poverty, the LGBTQ
community (with a focus on older adults and Spanish speaking community members), and people with
physical and mental health disabilities were identified as groups potentially experiencing the most
challenges related to this priority area. Of note is the group consensus that Respect and Social Inclusion
is also a lens through which the collaborative can analyze the three remaining priority areas from the
Community Health Assessment.
During the May 2019 LHNC meeting participants went over the timeline and objectives of our current
Community Health Improvement Plan process and were presented with proposed RSI measures,
objectives and goals. Attendees then participated in an Asset Based Community Development (ABCD)
workshop. The results from asset mapping activities is described in more depth in the section on
Respect and Social Inclusion. Through the ABCD workshop, Associations were identified as particular
groups of interest. Associations are groups where most members are there in an unpaid status and
participate based on common interests. Many LHNC partners felt that these were groups that we may
not be engaging with or fully understanding their interests.
Following the May LHNC meeting, Public Health staff and LHNC partners conducted more than 20
learning conversations with identified associations to learn more about their interests and thoughts
around RSI. These learning conversations, which engaged over 225 individuals, are not only a strategy
to increase respect and social inclusion, but will be used to help further develop the strategies identified
in this improvement plan and to start to deepen relationships with community members directly
impacted by issues LHNC is working to address.
The August 2019 LHNC convening then focused on sharing the content from completed learning
conversations and identifying RSI activities/outputs and measures for the CHIP. After reviewing the
learning conversation content, partners used Open Space Technology (OST)3 to identify populations or
topics for the purpose of further developing strategies and activities tied to improvement plan goals and
objectives. The outcomes from this process will form the basis of the action plan to help us achieve the
goals and objectives identified in this document.
The final LHNC meeting of 2019 was held on November 12, 2019. During this meeting, a subcommittee
was established to oversee finalization of the CHIP. Participants in each OST group were given notes
from community learning conversations with feedback that was pertinent to their OST group topic in
order to further develop action items. Ron Dwyer-Voss of Pacific Community Solutions then led LHNC
participants through an Asset Based Community Development exercise called the “Resident Power
3 Open Space Technology is a method of organizing a meeting that is participant driven and relies on attendees to determine topics of discussion, as well as how and where to engage in these discussions.
8
Ladder”. As we create systems that place residents in positions that control goal setting, planning and
implementation, we empower our community to identify and enact their own solutions.
LHNC members view this CHIP as a living document that will likely change as we work to authentically
engage and share power with the community members most impacted by our identified issues.
Although our partner agencies are skilled at gathering input from community members, those most
impacted by an issue are often missing when it comes to the design and implementation of solutions.
The act of involving more community members in the work of LHNC can itself be a strategy for
increasing respect and social inclusion.
9
Population Health Goals:
Goals are broad measures that are tied to long-term outcomes and reflect changes in
population health or community conditions. They primarily represent the downstream impacts
of social determinants of health. Outcomes, such as ischemic heart disease for example, are
complex and multi-factorial. For this reason, this CHIP has one set of long-term goals across the
four upstream priority areas of work.
1. By 2029, decrease premature mortality from ischemic heart disease by 20% (from 548 Years of Life
Lost (YLL) in 2015-2017 to 438 YLL in 2025-2027). Source: Napa County Public Health, Vital Statistics
2. By 2029, decrease premature mortality resulting from substance use disorders by 20% (from 568
Years of Life Lost (YLL) in 2015-2017 to 454 YLL in 2025-2027). Source: Napa County Public Health,
Vital Statistics
3. By 2029, decrease the age-adjusted death rate from suicide from 13/100,000 (2015-2017) to
10/100,000. Source: Napa County Public Health, Vital Statistics
4. By 2029, reduce the percentage of adults who are obese from 29% to 23%. Source: CHIS, 3 year
pooled
5. By 2029, reduce the percentage of students with an unhealthy body composition from 17% to 14%.
Source CDE
6. By 2029, reduce the percentage of adults reporting fair or poor health from 14% to 11%. Source:
County Health Rankings
7. By 2029, increase reading proficiency among 3rd graders from 43% (2017-2018) to 52%. Source:
California Department of Education
8. By 2029, decrease substantiated cases of child abuse and neglect from 9.1/1000 (2016-2018) to
7.3/1,000 (2026-2028). Source: California Child Welfare Indicators Project
9. By 2029, decrease substantiated cases of elder abuse from 38 cases per 10,000 adults 65 and older
(93/24,521) to 30/10,000.4 Source: HHSA, CSOA Division
10. By 2029, increase the proportion of students who are College/Career prepared from
o 43% (2018) to 52% at NVUSD
o 55% to 66% at CJUSD
o 71% to 85% at SHUSD
Source: California Department of Education
4 There were 93 cases of abuse by others substantiated in 2018. American Community Survey (5 yr estimates, 2013-2017) estimates 24,521
adults 65 and older in Napa County
10
Priority 1
Social inclusion means that people:
Experience a sense of belonging
Are accepted (for who they are) within their communities
Have valued roles in the community
Are actively participating in the community
Are involved in activities based on their personal preferences
Have social relationships with others whom they chose and share common interests
Have friends
Are civically engaged*
*Civic engagement means working to make a difference in the civic life of our communities and
developing the combination of knowledge, skills, values and motivation to make that difference. It
means promoting the quality of life in a community, through both political and non-political processes.
Having strong social connections benefits both physical and mental health across the life course.5
Research increasingly suggests that quality social relationships protect people against chronic diseases
as they age and may increase longevity. For example, the harmful effects of social isolation among
adults have been estimated to exceed those of obesity6, a well-known risk factor for other chronic
diseases. Social relationships have also been linked to both the development7,8 and progression9 of
cardiovascular disease.
In contrast, societies that are more socially cohesive are typically healthier and have lower mortality
rates than those that are less so.10,11 Experiencing discrimination based on age, race, sexual orientation
or other attributes decreases feelings of safety and increases stress and the risk for poor health
5 http://ccare.stanford.edu/uncategorized/connectedness-health-the-science-of-social-connection-infographic/ 6 J. Holt-Lunstad, T. B. Smith, M. Baker, T. Harris, D. Stephenson. Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic
Review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2015; 10 (2): 227 DOI: 10.1177/1745691614568352 7 Knox SS, Adelman A, Ellison RC, Arnett DK, Siegmund K, et al. Hostility, social support, and carotid artery atherosclerosis in the National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:1086–1089. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11074204 8 Kop WJ, Berman DS, Gransar H, Wong ND, Miranda-Peats R, et al. Social network and coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic
individuals. Psychosom Med. 2005;67:343–352 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911895 9 Brummett BH, Barefoot JC, Siegler IC, Clapp-Channing NE, Lytle BL, et al. Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery
disease who are at elevated risk for mortality. Psychosom Med. 2001;63:267–272. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11292274 10 Umberson, D., & Karas Montez, J. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S54-S66 11 Yang, Y. C., Boen, C., Gerken, K., Li, T., Schorpp, K., & Harris, K. M. (2016). Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 578-583.
11
outcomes among affected groups.12,13 The toxic stress of racism, along with differences in access to
resources and opportunities that result from racism, has resulted in people of color experiencing poorer
health outcomes across a wide range of conditions.14 Negative age stereotypes also predict adverse
outcomes among older adults, including possible effects on cognition.15 These differences in health,
which are unjust and avoidable, are known as health inequities.
In addition to being identified as a priority in the Community Health Assessment, themes related to
respect and social inclusion were also identified by community members in the Napa County Strategic
Planning process. Through a variety of public input sessions, Napa County residents collectively
expressed that they have the following vision for the future of Napa County: Napa County is inclusive of
its diverse, growing populations and provides opportunities to build community and for everyone to feel
safe. The table below identifies specific issues related to respect and social inclusion that were raised in
strategic plan input meetings.
The graphic on the following page gives examples of physical, social and emotional impacts of having
high levels of social connection and belonging vs. lower levels.
12 Ranji U, Beamesderfer A, Kates J, Salganicoff A. (2014). Health and access to care and coverage for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
individuals in the U.S. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. 13 Paradies, Y., Ben, J., Denson, N., Elias, A., Priest, N., Pieterse, A., Gupta, A., Kelaher, M., & Gee, G. (2015) Racism as a Determinant of Health:
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One, 10(9): e0138511. 14 https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/collections/racism-and-health.html 15 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26641877
Area of Opportunity identified by LHNC Major Issues Identified in County Strategic Plan
Respect & Social Inclusion
Need to improve senior services (mentions isolation)
Children and teens lack out-of-school and afterschool activities (mentions isolation)
Lack of safe spaces to build community and be active for all ages
Lack of events and activities to build community in Napa County
Community members wish to see more equitable treatment and inclusivity
12
13
Respect and Social Inclusion Objectives and Strategies:
The objectives in this section are mid-range outcomes and processes that will assist with measuring
progress toward increasing respect and social inclusion in Napa County, with the overall goal of
impacting the population health outcomes listed on page 9. In addition to reflecting meaningful change
within the priority areas, the objectives were selected based on the availability of population level data
that can be used to measure change over time. Strategies encompass the different specific activities
undertaken by partners and community members and will have short-term measurable outcomes.
Objectives:
By 2024, increase the rate of social associations from 7.5/100,000 to 8.3/100,000 (10%
increase). Source: County Health Rankings
By 2024, increase the percentage of older adults who report seeing friends and family either
daily or weekly from 77% to 85%. Source: HAPI survey
By 2024, increase the percent of LGBTQ students who report feeling safe at school from 55%
(2017) to 61%. (10% increase) Source: California Healthy Kids Survey
Strategies16:
Increase community engagement and inclusion through activities that are jointly designed with
and led by community members.
LHNC partners voted to prioritize outreach to four groups in the community – 1) mixed status
immigrant households, 2) people living in poverty, 3) LGBTQ community (with a focus on older
adults and Spanish speaking community members), and 4) people with physical and mental
health disabilities. Specific topics or projects that LHNC partners are already planning for or
engaged with include:
o Learning conversations
o Civic engagement training
o Census 2020 outreach
o Voter registration and participation
o Youth career pipeline project
o Promoting LGBTQ inclusion
Partner with HAPI and the Commission on Aging to hold an Ageism summit in order to raise
awareness about the impact of ageism and develop strategies to counter ageism in our
community.
16 Strategies may shift or evolve as community members become more engaged with this work.
14
Partner with Resilient Napa, the Child Abuse Prevention Council, and First 5 Napa County to
continue to expand awareness and resources related to Adverse Childhood/Community Events
(ACEs) and Resilience.
Partner with Napa Opioid Safety Coalition, Advisory Board on Alcohol and Drug Programs, and
Tobacco Free Napa to raise awareness and reduce stigma around substance use disorders.
Partner with Parks and Recreation Departments to make access to classes economically viable
for those who want to participate and to increase access to parks and open spaces.
Work with organizations to complete a policy scan to determine if organizational
polices/practices create barriers for certain groups of people.
Partner with Suicide Prevention Coalition, Rainbow Action Network and others to reduce stigma
and provide supports that decrease risk of suicide.
Pursue “Livable Community” designation through AARP.
Strategies to address RSI are based on community engagement activities including asset based
community development workshops and a community town hall. The two asset maps and the graphic
recording on the following pages show community member input on Respect and Social Inclusion. Asset
mapping is a process for identifying and connecting resources to achieve goals based on what we
already have and/or have access to. Participants looked at community assets (Individuals, Associations,
Institutions, Physical, Exchange, Culture)17, and how they can be connected and aligned for increasing
RSI. A second ABCD workshop was also held with Spanish-speaking residents in the city of Napa in
November 2019; the Individuals category was not included in this workshop due to smaller group size
and time limitations. On November 21, 2019, the Up Valley Family Center, the Calistoga Community
Schools Initiative, and Public Health collaborated to hold a bilingual community conversation around the
theme of respect and social inclusion. Ninety-four people attended the meeting and a graphic recorder
captured the outcomes of the evening. Evident in the outcomes of the meeting is the overlap between
Respect and Social Inclusion and the other priority areas within this improvement plan.
17 https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/resources/Documents/WhatisAssetBasedCommunityDevelopment.pdf
15
16
17
18
19
Priority 2
Being food insecure means being without reliable access to affordable, nutritious foods, with or without
reduced food intake. Access and ability to utilize healthy, nutritious food is a social determinant of
health, with food insecurity being linked to type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and a host of other
health conditions. Food insecurity is paradoxically linked to obesity, which is a risk factor for many
chronic diseases.18 The connection between obesity and food insecurity occurs because processed foods
and foods high in sugar and fat are often more affordable and more readily available than healthier
alternatives. Food insecurity also makes it difficult to control chronic conditions that require nutritional
management, such as diabetes. The graphic on the following page describes factors that contribute to
food (in)security and the health, social, and emotional benefits of food security.
Approximately one in 10 people in Napa County struggles with hunger; among children, the prevalence
of food insecurity is even higher and affects one in five children. Ending food insecurity in Napa County
will require significant community engagement and sustained commitment by a diverse array of
stakeholder groups working in partnership to achieve collective impact. Strategies to address food
insecurity are based on recommendations from the 2018 Napa County Emergency Food System Study.
18 Pan, L., Sherry, B., Njai, R., and Blanck, H.M. Food Insecurity Is Associated with Obesity among US Adults in 12 States. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012
Sep; 112(9): 1403–1409. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584410/
20
21
Food Insecurity Objectives and Strategies:
The objectives below are the mid-range outcomes and processes that will help to measure progress in addressing food insecurity and improving long-term health outcomes included in the population health goals outlined on page 9. In addition to reflecting meaningful change within the priority areas, the objectives were selected based on the availability of population level data that can be used to measure change over time. Strategies encompass the different specific activities undertaken by partners and community members and will have short-term measurable outcomes.
Objectives:
By 2024, reduce the food insecure population from 11% to 8%. Source: SNAP
By 2024, reduce the food insecurity rate among children from 19% to 15%. Source: SNAP
By 2024, increase the percentage of adults who always have access to fresh fruits and
vegetables from 84% to 88%. Source: Let’s Get Healthy CA indicator
By 2024, increase the percent of children (age 2-11) consuming 5+ serving of fruits and
vegetables in last day from 34% to 37%. Source: CHIS 2011-2016
Strategies:
Develop easily accessible, multi-lingual, multi-media regular communication about available
emergency food assistance programs and services, eligibility criteria and location-date-time
information.
Develop a human-centered story-telling campaign designed to decrease the stigma of food
insecurity and serve as a platform for potential donors to experience empathy for fellow
residents who are experiencing food insecurity.
Expand food access locations and minimize transportation barriers by leveraging existing place-
based service locations and operations to include food distribution within the scope of services
offered.
Large economic anchor institutions in the community (such as healthcare, education and
government institutions) should include supporting access to healthy food for all residents as an
essential part of future policy and planning activities.
22
Priority 3
Where we live matters for our health. Housing affordability, neighborhood conditions, and conditions
within the home impact the ability of individuals and families to make healthy choices. Excessive
housing costs are associated with a spectrum of health issues including food insecurity, psychological
stress, under-utilization of health care, and developmental and behavioral problems in children. As
households spend a larger proportion of their income on housing, they have less money to spend on
nutrition, health care, and other essential needs19.
When housing is not affordable, households may double up with other families or otherwise live in
overcrowded conditions. Residential overcrowding can negatively affect physical health and induce
elevated stress levels, depression and behavioral problems in children. The associated stress and the
quality of housing (e.g. presence of mold, lead paint, etc.) often associated with overcrowding have
been linked with certain chronic diseases, including asthma and cardiovascular diseases. While adults
may suffer from these negative effects, the impact of overcrowding on children and adolescents can be
extensive and long lasting20. Finally, lack of affordable housing is a major contributor to California’s
homelessness crisis. People experiencing homelessness are at increased risk of adverse health
outcomes, including premature death; homeless individuals have more emergency department visits
and inpatient admissions as those who are not homeless.
19 Maqbool, N., Ault, M., & Viveiros, J. (2015). The impacts of affordable housing on health: A research summary. Center for Housing Policy
20 Krieger, J., & Higgins, D. L. (2002). Housing and health: time again for public health action. American journal of public health, 92(5), 758-768
23
24
Housing Objectives and Strategies:
Objectives are mid-range outcomes and processes that will help achieve the goals. In addition to reflecting meaningful change within the priority areas, the objectives were selected based on the availability of population level data that can be used to measure change over time. Strategies encompass the different specific activities undertaken by partners and community members and will have short-term measurable outcomes.
Objectives:
By 2024, reduce the homelessness rate from 22.8/10,000 to 20.5/10,000. (10% decrease)
Source: National Alliance to End Homelessness (uses PIT count data)
By 2024, decrease overcrowding by 10% or more in the most impacted Census tracts (7 Census
Tracts in the County have overcrowding occurring in 10% or more of the households). Source:
American Community Survey.
By 2024, reduce the percent of renters who are housing cost burdened from 50% to 45%.
Source: American Community Survey.
Strategies:
Provide education on the connection between health outcomes and the built environment.
Promote a Health in All Policies approach when local jurisdictions are revising their general
plans.
25
Priority 4
Public transportation that is timely, convenient, and affordable gives residents who either cannot or
choose not to drive personal vehicles opportunities to access employment, healthcare and other
resources in the community. Safe and convenient active transportation (e.g., walking, biking, etc.) allows
people to naturally build physical activity into their daily routines and is recommended by The Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention as one strategy to improve health and prevent disease. Moreover,
when people increasingly choose transportation options other than personal vehicles, heavy vehicle
traffic in a region can decrease, reducing the likelihood of injuries from motor vehicle crashes, air
pollution, and commuter stress.21 The more time a person spends commuting (particularly while
sedentary), the more likely they are to experience or report adverse physical and mental health
outcomes. In addition, daily work commutes are responsible for the majority of daily traffic in a region.22
21 Maizlish, N. (2016). Increasing walking, cycling, and transit: Improving Californians’ health, saving costs, and reducing greenhouse gases.
Office of Health Equity, CA Department of Public Health. Retrieved from https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OHE/CDPH Document
Library/Maizlish-2016-Increasing-Walking-Cycling-Transit-Technical-Report-rev8-17-ADA.pdf. 22 Crabtree, S. (2010). Well-being lower among workers with long commutes. Retrieved October 31, 2018,
from https://news.gallup.com/poll/142142/wellbeing-lower-among-workers-long-commutes.aspx
26
27
Transportation Objectives and Strategies:
The objectives are mid-range outcomes and processes that will help achieve long term population health goals. In addition to reflecting meaningful change within the priority areas, the objectives were selected based on the availability of population level data that can be used to measure change over time. The objectives here focus specifically on measures related to alternate transportation and improvements in physical activity levels. Strategies encompass the different specific activities undertaken by partners and community members and will have short-term measurable outcomes.
Objectives:
By 2024, increase the percent of Napa County residents who regularly walk for transportation,
fun or exercise from 39% to 43%.
By 2024, reduce the percentage of people driving alone to work from 79% to 71%.
By 2024, increase the percentage of 5th, 7th and 9th grade students meeting fitness standards for
aerobic capacity from 65% (2017) to 72%. Source: California Department of Education.
Strategies:
Provide education on the connection between health outcomes and the built environment.
Promote a Health in All Policies approach when local jurisdictions are revising their general
plans.
28
Appendix
Community Partners
Abode Services
Area Agency on Aging
Catholic Charities of Santa Rosa
City of American Canyon
City of Calistoga
City of Napa
City of St. Helena
Coalition for a Tobacco Free Napa
Collabria Care
Commission on Aging
Community Action Napa Valley
Community Health Initiative (CHI)
Community Leaders Coalition (CLC)
Community Organizations Active in Disaster (COAD)
Cope Family Center
Disability Services and Legal Center
First 5 Napa County
Girls on the Run Napa-Solano
Healthy Aging Population Initiative (HAPI)
Individual Community Members from the Napa
County Community
Innovations Community Center
Innovative Health Solutions
Kaiser Permanente-Napa/Solano
Legacy Youth Project
LGBTQ Connection
Local Food Advisory Council
Mentis
Napa County HHSA - Administration
Napa County HHSA - Alcohol and Drug Services
Napa County HHSA - Comprehensive Services for
Older Adults
Napa County HHSA - Mental Health
Napa County HHSA - Public Health
Napa County HHSA - Self Sufficiency
Napa County Housing and Homeless Services
Napa County Library
Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District
Napa Farmer’s Market
Napa Valley Community Foundation
Napa Valley Community Housing
Napa County Mental Health Board
Napa Valley Transportation Agency
Napa Valley Unified School District
Napa Senior Center
NEWS
On the Move (OTM)
Ole Health
Opioid Safety Coalition
ParentsCAN
Partnership Health Plan of California
Puertas Abiertas Community Resource Center
Rainbow Action Network
Rianda House-Upper Valley Senior Activity Center
Resilient Napa
St. Helena Hospital
St. Joseph Health Queen of the Valley
St. Joseph Health Queen of the Valley-Community
Outreach
Suicide Prevention Council
Suscol Intertribal Council
Teens Connect
Up Valley Family Center