2017 Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan … Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan Texas A&M...

2017 Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan

Texas A&M University

2017 Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan Project No. 97167

Revision 1 2/26/2018

Executive Summary

2017 Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan

prepared for

Texas A&M University 2017 Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan

College Station, TX

Project No. 97167

Revision 1 2/26/2018

prepared by

Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc. Fort Worth, Texas

With subconsultants

JQ Engineering SJPA

COPYRIGHT © 2018 BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.

Executive Summary

2017 UES Master Plan Report Revision 1 Introduction

Texas A&M University TOC-1 Burns & McDonnell

INDEX AND CERTIFICATION

Texas A&M University 2017 Utilities & Energy Services

Master Plan Project No. 97167

Report Index

Certification

I hereby certify, as a Professional Engineer in the state of Texas, that the information in this document

was assembled under my direct personal charge. This report is not intended or represented to be suitable

for reuse by the Texas A&M University or others without specific verification or adaptation by the

Engineer. This certification is made in accordance with the provisions of the laws and rules of the Texas

Board of Professional Engineers under Texas State Administrative Code.

Justin Grissom, P.E., TX #108617

Date: 2/26/2018


Texas A&M University TOC-2 Burns & McDonnell

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 1-1

2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2 Primary Goals ...................................................................................................... 2-1

2.3 Overview of TAMU Utilities and Energy Services (UES) .................................. 2-2

2.4 Systems Improvements Overview ....................................................................... 2-3

2.5 Chilled Water Systems Improvements ................................................................. 2-3

2.5.1 Capacity Replacement/Renewal ........................................................... 2-3

2.5.2 Capacity Additions/Upgrades ............................................................... 2-4

2.5.3 Heat Pump Chiller Addition to SUP1 ................................................... 2-4

2.6 Condenser Water Systems Improvements ........................................................... 2-4

2.6.1 Capacity Repairs/Upgrades ................................................................... 2-4

2.6.2 Capacity Additions................................................................................ 2-5

2.7 Heating Hot Water Systems Improvements ......................................................... 2-5

2.7.1 Capacity Replacement/Renewal ........................................................... 2-5

2.7.2 Equipment Additions/Upgrades ............................................................ 2-6

2.8 Steam Systems Improvements ............................................................................. 2-6

2.9 Domestic Cold Water and Fire Water Systems Improvements ........................... 2-6

2.10 Domestic Hot Water Systems Improvements ...................................................... 2-7

2.10.1 Capacity Upgrades ................................................................................ 2-7

2.11 Combined Heat and Power Systems Improvements ............................................ 2-8

2.12 Thermal Distribution Systems Improvements ..................................................... 2-8

2.13 Utility Plant Controls Upgrades ........................................................................... 2-8

2.14 Moore-Connally Building (MCB) Improvements ............................................... 2-9

2.15 UES Department Building Development............................................................. 2-9

2.16 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................................. 2-9

2.17 Demand Side Energy Management ................................................................... 2-11

2.17.1 Air-Side Heat Recovery ...................................................................... 2-12

2.17.2 Obsolete Siemens Components........................................................... 2-12

2.17.3 Laboratory and Fume Hood Energy ................................................... 2-13

3.0 MODELING PARAMETERS & ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ......................... 3-1

3.1 Modeling Criteria ................................................................................................. 3-1

3.1.1 Distribution System Modeling .............................................................. 3-1

3.2 Analysis Tools ..................................................................................................... 3-1

3.2.1 Projected Growth Maps – Autodesk AutoCAD.................................... 3-1

3.2.2 Hydraulic Model – Engineered Software AFT Fathom 9.0 .................. 3-1

3.2.3 Domestic Water Distribution Model – WaterCAD .............................. 3-2


Texas A&M University 1-1 Burns & McDonnell

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

This Utility Master Plan was conducted by Burns & McDonnell, Inc. for the purpose of evaluating utility

infrastructure, design standards, and future campus growth for Texas A&M University (“the University”

or “TAMU”). This effort was concentrated on updating the 2012 Utilities and Energy Master Plan to

provide recommended improvements and conceptual designs for projects that will allow the University to

meet their future utility needs reliably while ensuring cost effective stewardship of utility infrastructure.

This study presents an updated Utility Infrastructure Program Plan, the outcomes of the analyses

conducted for the central plants, demand side management, and comments to the existing design

guidelines.

Improvement options, modifications, and upgrades have been evaluated using accepted fundamentals of

engineering and practical considerations of existing conditions, constructability issues, and financial

impact. Each recommendation is provided with a narrative description of the proposed design strategy,

estimated construction costs, general arrangement drawings, and life cycle cost analysis, where

applicable.

1.2 Acknowledgements

Burns & McDonnell would like to thank all University personnel who assisted in gathering the facilities,

systems, and operational data necessary for the successful completion of this study, including Jim Riley,

Bob Henry, Les Williams, Chris Stephenson, Steven Bowman, Ed Casto, Yasuko Sakurai, Nathan Jones,

Terry Easterwood, Brian Brummit, and all other personnel at the University who provided supporting

efforts.

2017 UES Master Plan Report Revision 1 Executive Summary


2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.1 Purpose

The purpose of this study is to identify operational and functional issues regarding the existing utility

infrastructure. A plan to effectively meet the future growth needs of Texas A&M, complete with project

capital costs, schedules of implementation, and general arrangement drawings, has been developed.

Potential improvements are evaluated based on first cost, life cycle cost, reliability, and redundancy,

where applicable. This study includes an analysis of thermal (chilled water (CHW), heating hot water

(HHW), and domestic hot water (DHW)) and civil (domestic water) utilities. A selection of steam

distribution systems were also inspected, with a focus on evaluating the future distribution of steam for

process lab applications, such as autoclaves. Contained within this executive summary are the

recommended improvements, by system, for Texas A&M utilities over the study term. Payback periods

are defined in terms of simple payback, unless otherwise noted. Expected project life assumes

maintenance in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations and feedback from University

personnel. All capital costs are in today’s dollars, unless otherwise noted.

2.2 Primary Goals

The primary goal of the study is to allow for the University to efficiently, reliably, and cost effectively

meet future utility needs that accompany growth on the East and West campuses of Texas A&M

University. To accomplish this, the study prioritized several objectives, including to:

• Review and compile design information for the existing utility infrastructure.

• Coordinate expected utility system growth needs to align with projected growth on campus.

• Develop a plan to meet the short and long term utility needs of the campus with discreet projects

and schedules.

• Provide a review of the production Design Guidelines to ensure the selection of robust and

reliable components for future utility system improvements.

• Project changes to the University’s greenhouse gas emissions resulting from chiller and hot water

boiler operation due to the expected campus growth at a summary level.



2.3 Overview of TAMU Utilities and Energy Services (UES)

The Utilities & Energy Services (UES) Department at Texas A&M University, which includes over 220

staff members and $85 million in annual billing, provides comprehensive utilities and energy

management services for the entire University, managing seven utility plants, serving over 800 buildings,

30 million gross square feet of facilities, and close to 80,000 faculty, staff, and students engaged in

research and teaching activities. The utility systems at the University have operated continuously longer

than any other in the region, with on-site power generation since 1893 to meet Texas A&M University

requirements. UES also manages one of the largest and most sophisticated Building Automation Systems

in the world, with over 500,000 monitoring and control points to regulate temperature, humidity, air and

water flow, and lighting in campus facilities.

The utility infrastructure at TAMU has an estimated replacement value of $1.5 billion which includes

the production, distribution and processing of electricity, water, sanitary sewer collection and treatment,

storm drainage, solid waste and recycling services, together with building demand-side management. The

figure below highlights the various scopes of services provided by UES.

Figure 2-1: UES Responsibility Overview

Additionally, UES has undertaken the following Energy Initiatives:

• Comprehensive Building Utility Metering

• Combined Heat and Power (CHP)

• $30MM invested in Energy Consumption Reduction Projects over six years



• Energy Stewardship Program

• Energy Performance Improvement (EPI) Program

• Energy Action Plan (EAP) 2020

• Chilled Water Optimization Program

• Utilities & Energy Design Standards

• Utilities & Energy Master Planning

• Utility Infrastructure Capital Investment

These initiatives have further supported UES’s stated mission of Providing world class service through

the production, delivery, and management of safe, reliable, and efficient utility and energy systems,

effectively stewarding university resources and the environment.

2.4 Systems Improvements Overview

The following sections describe the projects recommended for implementation through the end of the

study period. The projects represent capacity upgrades, efficiency improvements, end of life

replacements, new construction, and other plans that will improve the delivery of utilities to the TAMU

campus. The “Priority” or “First Project Priority” date indicates year of implementation or the first year

that the particular category of project has been identified for implementation if multiple projects of that

type are planned. All project costs are presented in 2017 dollars unless otherwise indicated.

2.5 Chilled Water Systems Improvements

The following equipment upgrades, renewals, and additions are recommended over the next 20 years to

maintain reliability, N+1 redundancy at the plant level and to provide life cycle cost savings.

2.5.1 Capacity Replacement/Renewal

Over the course of the next 20 years, several chilled water producing machines within the Texas A&M

University fleet will have exceeded ASHRAE and/or industry recommended service life. Chillers that

exceed their service life are recommended for replacement during the fiscal year in which the service life

is exceeded. This practice reflects the technically recommended date of replacement, which is

summarized in Table 6-3. However, project funding and available capital resources, as well as serviceable

condition of the equipment may dictate that some project dates be shifted and/or the scope of that

replacement should be modified. The actual date of replacement projects are included in Table 6-7 and

Table 6-8.



Programmed cost...…….…...…$45,600,000 First Project Priority……………2023

2.5.2 Capacity Additions/Upgrades

As both East and West campuses continue to experience significant growth, the chilled water system will

experience corresponding increases in demand that will require the installation of additional chilled water

production equipment. New equipment is recommended for installation within physical expansions of

SUP1 and SUP3 and within a new plant (SUP4) on West Campus. The recommended dates of

implementation for capacity additions are included in Table 6-7 and Table 6-8.


2.5.3 Heat Pump Chiller Addition to SUP1

Install a nominal 1200 ton Heat Pump Chiller to serve the West Campus Chilled Water system. The

addition of the heat pump chiller will allow waste heat generated during the production of chilled water,

which is normally rejected through a cooling tower, to be recovered and used to produce “free” heating

hot water. This technology has already been utilized successfully at SUP2, resulting in significant savings

to the University due to reduced boiler natural gas consumption, makeup water, and chemical treatment

water while also reducing the campus carbon footprint. The payback period listed below is reflective of

escalated natural gas and electrical costs.

Programmed cost...…….…...…$4,100,000 Priority...…………………………………2021 Expected Project Life…………….23 Years Payback…………………………..13.3 Years

2.6 Condenser Water Systems Improvements


maintain reliability and N+1 redundancy at the plant level.

2.6.1 Capacity Repairs/Upgrades

Many of the existing cooling towers on campus have served the heat rejection needs of the chilled water

production equipment for a number of years, often through multiple upgrades and/or replacements of the

equipment that the cooling towers serve. As the cooling towers have aged, performance has deteriorated,

even stranding chilled water production capacity at the CUP, as the condition of existing towers CT13



and CT14 can no longer support the chillers they serve. These towers require repairs to return the towers

to nameplate capacity and to provide maintenance for the prevention of further degradation. Further, as

chilled water production equipment capacity is upgraded, it can be cost effective to upgrade existing

towers in lieu of installing new capacity. An inspection of the existing towers was performed to verify the

condition and capacity of the cooling towers and to evaluate their potential for expansion/upgrade. The

recommended dates of implementation for cooling tower repairs and upgrades are included in Table 7-3

and Table 7-4. The year in service for all projects noted as “REPAIR-MAINT” was estimated with the

assumption that all projects would be undertaken linearly starting in 2019 and be completed by 2022.

These dates can be shifted pending funding availability and to accommodate plant operational needs.


2.6.2 Capacity Additions

As both East and West campuses continue to experience significant growth, the chilled water system will

experience corresponding increases in demand that will require the installation of additional chilled water

production equipment. All additional tons of installed chiller capacity will require the support of

additional heat rejection capacity. New cooling towers are recommended for installation within physical

expansions of SUP1 and SUP3 and at a new plant (SUP4) on West Campus. The recommended dates of

implementation for capacity additions are included in Table 7-3 and Table 7-4. The costs for

implementation of these cooling tower addition projects are included in the chilled water additions

projects summarized in Table 6-7 and Table 6-8.

2.7 Heating Hot Water Systems Improvements


maintain reliability and N+1 redundancy at the plant level.

2.7.1 Capacity Replacement/Renewal

Over the course of the next 20 years, several heating hot water producing machines within the Texas

A&M University fleet will have exceeded ASHRAE and/or industry recommended service life. Boilers

and heat exchangers that exceed their service life are recommended for replacement during the fiscal year

in which the service life is exceeded. This practice reflects the technically recommended date of

replacement. However, project funding and available capital resources, as well as serviceable condition of

the equipment may dictate that some project dates be shifted and/or the scope of that replacement should

be modified. The actual date of replacement projects are included in Table 8-3.




2.7.2 Equipment Additions/Upgrades

As both East and West campuses continue to experience significant growth, the heating hot water system

will experience corresponding increases in demand that will require the installation of additional heating

hot water production equipment. New equipment is recommended for installation within physical

expansions of SUP1 and within a new plant (SUP4) on West Campus. The recommended dates of

implementation for capacity additions are included in Table 8-3.


2.8 Steam Systems Improvements

Steam is generated at the Central Utility Plant (CUP) on East Campus via three boilers, B1, B2, and B12.

This steam is largely utilized in various equipment within the CUP, however a small portion of

intermediate pressure steam is also distributed to a limited number of buildings on East Campus to serve

process loads, such as sterilization autoclaves. Over the years, the condition of distribution infrastructure

has deteriorated to the point that, given the small quantity of equipment that consumes steam, the retrofit

or replacement of that process equipment has become more cost effective than repair/replacement of the

distribution infrastructure. In addition, the condition of the distribution system has, in places, presented

safety concerns that UES has recognized the need to address. The improvements listed in Section 9.5 are

recommended for implementation within the next 5 years, which will largely eliminate the distribution of

steam to campus, except for supply to the Chemistry complex and Zachry Building as the largest steam

consumers. These costs are further delineated in Table 9-7.

Programmed cost...…….…...……$1,680,000 Priority...…………………………….2020

2.9 Domestic Cold Water and Fire Water Systems Improvements

Campus domestic water supplied by wells is stored in ground tanks at the Luza Lane transfer pump

station, which then moves water to the F&B ground storage tanks for use by service pumps pumping into

the campus distribution system.

The domestic water model results identified some sections of piping that may experience elevated flow

velocity and excessive head loss. These sections of piping are recommended for further analysis to



determine the extent of needed future replacement, if any such need exists. The model results also

indicated that additional system installations may be required to improve the predicted low fire flow

pressure in the western edge of the system as shown in Appendix I and Table 11-8. However, the

buildings in that area of campus are currently provided with fire protection from alternative sources and

thus the system is not considered deficient. Improvements are recommended in the future and as budget

allows to support potential future expansion that may occur in that area. Since this project may not be

required pending future campus development, programmed costs have not been included in the overall

project totals.

Programmed cost...…….…...…$2,820,000

Sections of new distribution pipe are recommended to be replaced with larger pipe in four locations as

shown in Appendix I. These improvements, which total nearly 10,000 LF on both the East and West

Campuses, should be performed prior to the construction of the associated adjacent buildings which they

will ultimately serve.


2.10 Domestic Hot Water Systems Improvements

Domestic hot water on campus is generated both locally and centrally. Central domestic hot water is

generated at the CUP and SUP3 and distributed to approximately 65 buildings on East Campus. The

University’s strategy to manage future domestic hot water on East Campus is the same as West Campus,

and therefore all new buildings will be supplied with local heaters to manage their domestic hot water

needs.

The two CUP heat exchangers (DHWHX-1 and DHWHX-2) used to supply domestic hot water are not

large enough to provide the recommended N+1 capacity and there are occasions when the University is

forced to run both heat exchangers simultaneously. Additionally, the domestic hot water boilers in SUP3

(DHWB301 and DHWB302) are in too poor condition to provide reliable service and are recommended

for replacement within the next 5 years.

2.10.1 Capacity Upgrades

To address redundancy and reliability concerns at SUP3 with a robust solution, the replacement of

existing domestic hot water boilers DHWB301 and DHWB302 is recommended. To address redundancy

and reliability concerns at the CUP, the possible repurpose of existing HHW HX-1 to the production of



domestic hot water is recommended, pending further investigation into materials of construction for

compliance with safety codes.

Programmed cost...…….…...……$1,250,000 First Project Priority………………2018

2.11 Combined Heat and Power Systems Improvements

Much of the existing CHP system was installed in 2011, therefore, given proper maintenance, most major

components of the system should remain in serviceable condition for the duration of this study. Table

13-2 lists recommendations for major service intervals based on hours of operation. Continued

inspections of major equipment are recommended based on service life, performance, and routine

maintenance reports.

For planning purposes, it is recommended that TAMU carry budgetary reserves for the major

maintenance and capital replacement items described in Table 13-2, which may be required following

inspections of major equipment. Additionally, should the University determine that a second CHP system

may provide and economic or reliability benefit to campus, it is recommended that TAMU carry

$150,000 for general studies to further examine those benefits, potential restrictions, and possible

solutions for that option. Since this is placeholder for a study that will be conducted at an undetermined

date in the future, programmed costs have not been included in the overall project totals.

Programmed cost...…….…...…$150,000

2.12 Thermal Distribution Systems Improvements

As the campus grows, the thermal distribution systems will require extensions to serve the new areas of

building expansion on campus. The costs below reflect new distribution projects only and do not include

existing piping replacements.


2.13 Utility Plant Controls Upgrades

Modern and efficient controls are the foundation of a reliable utility production system. The control

systems at the CUP, SUP1, SUP2, SUP3, and the Domestic Water Plant are aged and will require

software and hardware upgrades in the near term to maintain reliable utility service.




2.14 Moore-Connally Building (MCB) Improvements

The Moore-Connally Building (MCB) is located approximately 1-mile northeast of the East Campus of

the Texas A&M University College Station campus. This 7-floor building serves as an administrative

office facility where many of the meetings that guide the future of the campus are held. The adjacent

utility building houses equipment to directly serve the heating and cooling needs of the MCB. The

existing chillers and cooling towers have aged beyond their useful service life and are in need of

replacement in the near term.

Programmed cost...…….…...…$1,300,000 Priority...…………………………2020

2.15 UES Department Building Development

The programming and planning process used for the new UES administration building produced multiple

floor plan and site plan options. Additionally, the process evaluated potential construction methods and

exterior aesthetic options. Each option considered a phased development of the site with the

administration building as the initial phase and the distribution building as a secondary phase.

While the master planning process incorporated full build-out options for the site, the programming and

estimated cost of construction do not incorporate the distribution building development.

Programmed cost...…….…...…$8,410,000 Priority...…………………………2022

2.16 Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Since 2002, Texas A&M has reduced energy consumption and GHG emissions related to campus

operations through an aggressive energy consumption reduction program. Going forward, it is assumed

that the University will continue the practice of reducing energy consumption in existing buildings and

setting high efficiency standards for future construction. The assumed future efficiency improvements for

existing and new buildings are included below in Table 2-1.



Table 2-1: Utility Improvement Recommendations

Building Category % Reduction Term

Existing 1.5 Annually

New 1 Annually

Non-Energy 1.5 Annually

Based on the Demand Side Management (DSM) opportunities on campus, it is assumed that the GHG

output associated with the energy consumption at existing buildings will be reduced by 1.5% annually,

which result in a total average GHG reduction of over 25% in the existing buildings by the end of the

plan. For the same 20 year period, the average carbon output of new space growth will be reduced by a

proposed 1% annually. This will result in new space that is over 17% more carbon efficient at the end of

the plan as compared to the beginning of the plan. Overall, this will reduce the total average carbon output

for new space for the 20 year period by over 8.5%. This is an aggressive target and will be achieved by a

combination of demand side reductions in the buildings and a more efficient carbon content of purchased

energy.



2.17 Demand Side Energy Management

Texas A&M has made significant reductions in Energy Use Intensity since 2002.

Figure 2-2: Campus GSF vs Energy Consumption

Figure 2-3: TAMU Energy Use Intensity Improvements



The figures above show campus growth, campus energy consumption, and annual EUI over nearly two

decades. It can be seen in Figure 2-3 that significant reductions in EUI have been made since 2002.

As a part of this Master Plan, an analysis was performed and recommendations made regarding future

Demand Side Management (DSM) initiatives on campus. In addition to the DSM strategies already being

undertaken by TAMU, three immediate areas of opportunity on campus were identified to affect building

energy usage and utility demands.

2.17.1 Air-Side Heat Recovery

TAMU campus standards and state energy codes typically require heat recovery to be installed on

building exhaust air during new construction. This is to transfer heat between the exhaust and outside

airstreams and offset heating and cooling energy in the AHUs. Historically, TAMU has struggled to

maintain and operate the existing heat recovery systems. This is similar to most college campuses and is

due to both the complexity of the systems and cumbersome maintenance requirements. On average

across the campus, 35% of the systems are currently abandoned or have malfunctioned. This study

performed and analysis of commercially available heat recovery technologies and determined a strategy

for implementing the most life cycle cost effective and safe systems based on building use and size.

Although enthalpy wheels are by far the most effective technology and should be used in many cases if

maintainable, they are not always appropriate due to the possibility of cross-contamination between the

airstreams. Fixed plate heat exchangers are recommended for smaller applications. For larger airflows

where either the exhaust and outside airstreams are far apart or where cross-contamination presents indoor

air quality hazards, run-around glycol coils are recommended.

2.17.2 Obsolete Siemens Components

Due to the obsolescence of older Siemens BAS components in over 200 buildings on campus, and the

functional limitations caused by that obsolescence, BMcD recommends a phased approach to replace the

outdated and limiting components across the campus. TAMU is having more and more difficulty

sourcing and stockpiling parts for failing hardware, because Siemens does not manufacture or support

those obsolete components. Several of the typical controllers on campus have not been supported for

many years. The replacement of the obsolete components will naturally result in energy savings in the

buildings, due to elimination of outdated pneumatic controls and use of occupancy feedback.

Furthermore, TAMU will use lessons learned from their in-depth knowledge of Siemens controls on

campus to optimize the sequences of operation in the replaced controllers. The total cost of these

upgrades will be spread out over two project phases.



Programmed cost Phase 1....…$9,190,000 Project Priority..........………..….2019 Programmed cost Phase 2....…$5,000,000 Project Priority..........………..….2021

2.17.3 Laboratory and Fume Hood Energy

This report includes an analysis of the energy impact of the fume hoods and associated labs on campus in

an effort to frame the potential for lab energy savings. BMcD built sample lab energy models, informed

by sample building walkthroughs, to quantify typical energy savings for incremental investments in lab

energy efficiency. The results of the analysis are as follows:

1. The 1,712 fume hoods on campus are estimated to cost as much as $3.1 Million dollars to operate

annually.

2. Sampled labs have significant opportunity for energy savings (40-65%).

3. Investment should be focused first on the high ROI opportunities like setpoints, occupancy

sensors, and minimum fume hood airflow modifications.

4. Conversion of labs/hoods to VAV may require significant investment in infrastructure.

5. Labs have to be analyzed individually to avoid wasting money on technologies that won’t

actually save money (airflow). Depending on fume hood density in a lab, modifications to the

hoods may cease to show a return on investment.

This report includes a recommended strategy consisting of detailed laboratory inventories,

evaluation/modeling of potential energy savings, grouping of labs by system type, potential savings, and

investment, and categorizing the labs for prioritized investment. The goal is to address the high-ROI labs

first, using tools and techniques already in place (like the EPI program) and then moving on to the labs

that require capital investment to achieve deep energy savings. The development of this program and

approach should consider the planned replacement of the obsolete Siemens controls components to

minimize cost and schedule impacts.

***



The following table summarizes many of the project recommendations, listed by financial year of service.

Further detail regarding recommendations can be found in the following sections and in Appendix D.

Table 2-2: 2017 UES Master Plan Recommendations Summary

Location Tag/Description

Size/

Capacity Units

Cost (FY17

Dollars) Cost Escalated to Install Year Project Type

FY18

CUP CT-13/14-P1 N/A TON $202,000 $202,000 REPAIR-CAPACITY

SUP2 HHWB201 17 MMBTU $940,000 $960,000 REPLACEMENT

SUP2 HHWB202 17 MMBTU $940,000 $960,000 REPLACEMENT

SUP3 DHWB301/302 17 MMBTU $1,030,000 $1,160,000 REPLACEMENT

TOTAL FY18 $3,092,000 $3,282,000

FY19

CUP CT13-P2 N/A N/A $834,000 $859,000 REPAIR-CAPACITY

CUP CT-15 N/A N/A $87,500 $90,000 REPAIR-MAINT


SUP2 HHWB209 500 BHP $1,475,000 $1,570,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION RESEARCH 24 INCH $4,106,000 $4,357,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION SOUTHSIDE 12 INCH $465,000 $494,000 ADDITION

CAMPUS BAS SIEMENS CONTROLS – P1 N/A N/A $9,190,000 $9,750,000 UPGRADE

PLANTS UTILITY PLANT CONTROLS N/A N/A $7,000,000 $7,400,000 UPGRADE

TOTAL FY19 $23,245,500 $24,611,000

FY20

MCB CH901-902 & CT901-902 225 TON $1,300,000 $1,500,000 REPLACEMENT

CUP CT14-P3 N/A N/A $266,500 $283,000 REPAIR-CAPACITY

CUP CT- 17 N/A N/A $88,000 $93,000 REPAIR-MAINT


SUP2 CT201-203 N/A N/A $400,000 $424,000 UPGRADE

CUP HX-1 20 MMBTU $220,000 $250,000 REPURPOSE

DIST DISTRIBUTION CAMPUS FRONT 24 INCH $1,110,000 $1,213,000 ADDITION

CUP STEAM SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS N/A N/A $1,680,000 $1,834,000 UPGRADE

TOTAL FY20 $5,139,500 $5,677,000

FY21

SUP1 CH107/108 2500 TON $16,200,000 $18,200,000 ADDITION

SUP1 HRC109 1200 TON $4,100,000 $4,600,000 REPLACEMENT




Size/

Capacity Units

Cost (FY17




CUP HX-7 60 MMBTU $680,000 $760,000 REPLACEMENT

CAMPUS BAS SIEMENS CONTROLS – P2 N/A N/A $5,000,000 $5,600,000 UPGRADE

TOTAL FY21 $26,044,000 $29,230,000

FY22



SUP3 HHWB303 17 MMBTU $900,000 $1,050,000 REPLACEMENT

DIST DISTRIBUTION WEST 24 INCH $3,662,000 $4,246,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION RESEARCH 18 INCH $751,000 $871,000 ADDITION

DW SYSTEM

NORTHEAST END EXPANSION 12 INCH $570,000 $660,000 ADDITION

UES UES BUILDING DEVELOPMENT N/A N/A $8,410,000 $9,750,000

NEW CONSTRUCTION

TOTAL FY22 $14,481,000 $16,789,000

FY23

CUP CH01 2500 TON $3,200,000 $3,800,000 REPLACEMENT


SUP3 CH305 3150 3150 TON $13,000,000 $15,500,000 ADDITION


DIST DISTRIBUTION RESEARCH 8 INCH $344,000 $411,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION NORTHSIDE 8 INCH $430,000 $514,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION SOUTHSIDE 12 INCH $140,000 $168,000 ADDITION

TOTAL FY23 $21,154,000 $25,203,000

FY24

SUP1 CH101/102 2500 TON $3,600,000 $4,500,000 REPLACEMENT

SUP1 CT101/102 633 N/A N/A $253,000 $312,000 UPGRADE

TOTAL FY24 $3,853,000 $4,812,000

FY25

SUP4 CH401-403 2500 TON $36,800,000 $45,300,000 ADDITION-PH1

CUP HX-3/4 60 MMBTU $250,000 $320,000 REPLACEMENT


SUP4 HHWB401-406 34 MMBTU $1,620,000 $2,050,000 ADDITION

TOTAL FY25 $39,510,000 $48,740,000

FY26

SUP1 HHWB110-112 17 MMBTU $820,000 $1,070,000 ADDITION




Size/

Capacity Units

Cost (FY17


TOTAL FY26 $820,000 $1,070,000

FY27


TOTAL FY27 $840,000 $1,130,000

FY28

SUP3 CH304 2500 TON $3,100,000 $4,300,000 REPLACEMENT

SUP2 HHWB203-208 15.6 MMBTU $1,240,000 $1,710,000 REPLACEMENT

SUP3 HHWB304-309 15.6 MMBTU $1,050,000 $1,450,000 REPLACEMENT

TOTAL FY29 $5,390,000 $7,460,000

FY29

SUP4 CH404 2500 TON $4,400,000 $6,200,000 ADDITION-PH1A

DIST DISTRIBUTION RESEARCH 12 INCH $1,817,000 $2,591,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION ATHLETICS 24 INCH $1,831,000 $2,611,000 ADDITION

TOTAL FY31 $8,048,000 $11,402,000

FY31



TOTAL FY32 $6,400,000 $9,800,000

FY32





CUP HX-6 60 MMBTU $680,000 $1,050,000 REPLACEMENT

TOTAL FY32 $13,880,000 $21,050,000

FY33


SUP4 CH405-406 2500 TON $26,200,000 $42,000,000 ADDITION-PH2

SUP4 HHWB407-412 34 MMBTU $1,620,000 $2,600,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION CAMPUS FRONT 24 INCH $888,000 $1,425,000 ADDITION

TOTAL FY33 $30,808,000 $49,425,000

FY34




TOTAL FY34 $10,800,000 $17,700,000

FY35




Size/

Capacity Units

Cost (FY17


DIST DISTRIBUTION ATHLETICS 24 INCH $1,665,000 $2,835,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION WEST 12 INCH $364,000 $620,000 ADDITION

TOTAL FY35 $2,029,000 $3,455,000

FY36

CUP HX-5 60 INCH $220,000 $390,000 REPLACEMENT

DIST DISTRIBUTION CAMPUS FRONT 14 INCH $577,000 $1,012,000 ADDITION

DIST DISTRIBUTION SOUTHSIDE 18 INCH $850,000 $1,491,000 ADDITION

TOTAL FY36 $1,647,000 $2,893,000

FY37

SUP4 CH407-408 2500 TON $8,300,000 $15,000,000 ADDITION-PH2A DW

SYSTEM SOUTHWEST END EXPANSION 12 INCH $670,000 $1,210,000 ADDITION

DW SYSTEM

SOUTHEAST END EXPANSION 12 INCH $800,000 $1,435,000 ADDITION

TOTAL FY37 $9,770,000 $17,645,000

2017 UTILITES MASTER PLAN GRAND TOTAL $226,951,000 $301,374,000

(a) Annual escalation of 3% per year.

Burns & McDonnell 100 Energy Way, Suite 1900

Fort Worth, TX 76102 O 817-377-0361 F 817-377-0394

www.burnsmcd.com

2017 Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan … Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan Texas A&M...

Documents

Transcript of 2017 Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan … Utilities & Energy Services Master Plan Texas A&M...