2017 FLEET BAROMETER · 6 * Company size boundary depends of the country – see previous page **...
Transcript of 2017 FLEET BAROMETER · 6 * Company size boundary depends of the country – see previous page **...
1
2017 FLEET BAROMETER
International report Focus Europe
Table of content
I CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET
II FINANCING
III TELEMATICS
IV PERSPECTIVES IN TERMS OF MOBILITY
p.26
p.53
p.77
p.94
2
V p.108 INFORMATION SOURCES
3
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2002
Creation in
France
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Greece out
of the study
India out of
the study
2017 Brazil and Russia
out of the study
Perimeter of the study
Focus Europe
DATA COLLECTION METHOD
CATI System (Computer Assisted
Telephone Interviewing)
JANUARY
2017
16
FIELDWORK PERIOD TARGET
FEBRUARY
2017
6
QUOTAS
Company size
& sector 10 minutes in average
(without SME focus)
SAMPLE DURATION OF INTERVIEWS
3847 interviews including
3540 through Europe
4
Fleet managers in
companies of all industries
using at least 1 corporate
vehicle
Methodology
5
Less than 10 employees
10 to 99 employees
100 to 249 employees
100 to 499 employees
100 to 999 employees
250 employees and
more
500 employees and
more
1000 employees and
more
FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU
Sample
6
* Company size boundary depends of the country – see previous page
** Fleet size: the size of the fleet has been defined according to the total number of vehicles given in question A5.
Company size
10 – 99 employees
100 to 249/499/999* employees
250/500/1000* employees and more
Less than 10 employees
Fleet size **
Medium fleet = 10 – 49 vehicles
Large fleet = 50 vehicles and more
Small fleet = 1 – 9 vehicles
Pictograms
7
Data weighting
2017 2005 to 2015 2016
Same perimeter as 2005 to 2015
period (at least 1 vehicle)
BUT
Use of a sample that allows to be
representative of company cars
volume involved in each segment.
No additional weighting used.
New survey perimeter:
companies with a fleet of
at least 10 company
vehicles
Comparison not possible
Perimeter of the survey: companies
with at least one company vehicle.
Weighting of the data in order to
be representative of the number
of companies: very low weight of
the larger companies (less than
1%) even if more or less 20% of
the company vehicles are bought
by larger companies.
In order to be able to compare 2017’s results with the results of the previous years, CSA has
recalculated the 2011 to 2015 results with the 2017 process.
Results displayed in this report concerning the previous years (2011 to 2016) may differ from the
one displayed in the previous years reports as they used an other weighing calculation (with
other objectives in terms of representativeness).
!
8
EU BE CZ FR DE IT PL PT ES CH UK NL LU
Total
interviews 3536 300 297 300 300 302 300 300 220 314 303 300 300
1175
(33%)
101
(33%)
74
(25%)
100
(33%)
100
(33%)
100
(33%)
98
(33%)
102
(34%)
101
(46%)
98
(31%)
100
(34%)
100
(33%)
101
(33%)
762
(22%)
60
(20%)
78
(26%)
60
(20%)
60
(20%)
65
(22%)
61
(20%)
61
(20%)
61
(28%)
74
(24%)
62
(20%)
60
(20%)
60
(20%)
916
(26%)
80
(27%)
84
(28%)
80
(27%)
80
(27%)
79
(26%)
81
(27%)
82
(28%)
29
(13%)
81
(26%)
80
(26%)
80
(27%)
80
(27%)
683
(19%)
59
(20%)
61
(21%)
60
(20%)
60
(20%)
58
(19%)
60
(20%)
55
(18%)
29
(13%)
61
(19%)
61
(20%)
60
(20%)
59
(20%)
Sample
Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 fleet vehicle.
This sample structure was set up in order to be roughly representative of the number of cars registered by companies for each company size
segment and activity sector as well as to allow comparisons between countries on a similar bases.
In the following slides, no additional weighting of the data are applied to company sizes or activity sectors segments contrary to previous waves.
9
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
Total
interviews 3536 300 297 300 300 302 300 300 220 314 303 300 300
Industry 492 (14%)
32 (11%)
37
(12%)
32
(11%)
35
(12%)
44
(15%)
54
(17%)
31
(10%)
36
(16%)
75
(24%)
29
(10%)
37
(12%)
50
(17%)
Construction 1046 (29%)
82
(27%)
96
(32%)
94
(31%)
95
(32%)
81
(27%)
77
(26%)
133
(44%)
24
(11%)
57
(18%)
133
(44%)
109
(37%)
65
(22%)
Trade 1261
(36%)
108
(36%)
96
(32%)
108
(36%)
138
(46%)
123
(41%)
83
(28%)
89
(30%)
106
(48%)
63
(20%)
83
(27%)
100
(33%)
164
(54%)
Service 737 (21%)
78
(26%)
68
(23%)
66
(22%)
32
(11%)
54
(18%)
86
(29%)
47
(16%)
54
(25%)
119
(38%)
58
(19%)
54
(18%)
21
(7%)
Sample
This sample structure was set up in order to be roughly representative of the number of cars registered by companies for each company size
segment and activity sector as well as to allow comparisons between countries on a similar bases.
In the following slides, no additional weighting of the data are applied to company sizes or activity sectors segments contrary to previous waves.
Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 fleet vehicle.
10
CONTEXT AND MAIN RESULTS
11
A – CONTEXT
Context
Compared evolution of personal car sales in the 12 European countries that were part of this observatory on the scale to
the left versus GDP growth rate on the scale to the right
12
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
10 000 000
10 500 000
11 000 000
11 500 000
12 000 000
12 500 000
13 000 000
13 500 000
14 000 000
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Total sales europe Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat
Context
2008: onset of the crisis, simultaneous personal car (PC) sales and GDP drop.
2009: slight sales recovery thanks to the support of scrappage schemes.
2010: market collapse following the cessation of the scrappage schemes measures despite an uptick of GDP growth rates.
2011 – 2012: fall of PC sales volumes in line and at the same time the GDP declined.
2013: sales decline limited to -1.68%, it seems that the market has bottomed out in 2013.
2014 - 2016: Growth of the European GDP (28 Europeans countries) that reaches annual increase rates of respectively +1.6%, +2.2% and +1.9% for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016. Car market turnaround that registers a 3 years increase in a row with significant annual increase rates for the whole 12 countries included in the survey of +5.1%, +9.1% and +6.0% (a global increase rate of +21.7%). With 13.2 millions units sold in 2016, the market reached the 2009’s level. The sales’ volume is quite close from the pre-crisis level: there is still a difference of 4% or 0.5 million units in order to reach this boundary.
Even if uncertainty is high, experts foresee the general economy to register modest growth rates for the 2 coming years that should reach +1.8% per year (annual increase rate of the GDP), a similar level that the ones observed during the last 3 years. The ACEA expects the car market dynamism to slow down and foresees a low increase rate of only +1% in terms of units sold for the coming year (versus +6.8% for the whole Europe in 2016).
13
Context
The light commercial vehicle market (LCV), which is nearly exclusively bought by companies, is much more strongly correlated to the evolution of the GDP growth rate.
3 years increase in a row of the LCV market for the 12 European countries included in the scope of the survey. Sales respectively increase of +10.5%, +22.9% and +22.3% for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Compared evolution of LCV sales in the 12 European countries that were part of this observatory on the scale to the left
versus GDP growth rate on the scale to the right
14
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
1 000 000
1 500 000
2 000 000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
total sales europe Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat
Context
Sales of personal vehicles evolution, base 100 in 2004, on the scale to the right compared with the GDP growth
evolution on the scale to the left
15
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
FR/DE UK ES/PT/IT CH CZ/PL LU/BE/NL Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat
Context
• France and Germany supported the personal vehicles sales as of the start of the crisis in 2009 by putting
into place a scrappage scheme or incentives for clean, energy efficient vehicles. The suspension of
these measures explains, in part, the declines we saw in these countries between 2010 and 2013. Over
the period, sales went from a 100 index in 2004 to an index of 90 in 2013. 2014 was the year of the
turnaround with a growth of 1.9 % in 2014, + 6.0% in 2015 and +4.8% in 2016.
• Spain, Portugal and Italy are the 3 countries that have been hit the hardest by this economic crisis.
Since 2007, personal vehicle sales haven’t stopped sliding every year going from an index of 109 in 2007
to 54 in 2013. These countries group have a significant reversal in 2014. Since 2013, they register a 3
years in a row increase of respectively +10.6 %, +18% and +14% for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Since 2013, sales volume of Personal Cars increase of +49.1%. Nevertheless, we are still far from the pre-
crisis level: -26.6% in 2016 compared with sales of the year 2007.
• On the opposite spectrum, Switzerland has always seen their personal vehicles sales volume grow from
2009 to 2012 but recorded a significant decline in 2013 and 2014. The market registers a turnaround in
2015 with an increase of +7.2% a slight decrease of -2% in 2016 certainly due to anticipated sales
recorded in 2015 because of the decrease of imported products price.
• Czech Republic and Poland: Wide collapse of the polish market between 2000 and 2006. Personal cars
sales volumes wasn’t widely impacted by the financial crisis (between 2007 and 2013) but register since
2013 an increase of 3 years in a row of respectively +14.4%, +12.7% and +15.4% per year or +48.6% for
the whole period between 2013 and 2016.
16
Context
• UK: Personal cars sales volumes were widely impacted by the financial crisis between 2007 and
2011. During the last 2 years of this period, the market was supported by corporate sales. During the 2012
to 2016 period, the country registers five years of growth in a row and a wide rise in sales of +38.7%.
Despite political and economic uncertainty (Brexit of June 2016), the market continues to increase in
2016 (up +2.3%), reaching highest ever number of new cars demanded by UK customers.
• Benelux: Sales down in 2009 at the time of the crisis (-16.3%), in 2011 the losses were largely met
(+8.2% compared with 2008), overall decline in sales in the next period: 2011-2014 with a decrease of
14.8%. In the last 2 years, only Belgium registers a wide increase of +11.7% (The Netherlands register a
decrease of -1.2% and Luxembourg an increase of +1.5%).
17
Context
Sales evolution of light commercial vehicles, base 100 in 2007, on the scale to the right compared to the
European GDP growth rate on the scale to the left
18
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
30
50
70
90
110
130
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
FR/BE/UK/NL/DE/PL ES/PT/IT CH/LU Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat
Context
• The light commercial vehicle market, less subject to government grants, is much more strongly correlated
with the GDP growth rate.
• Spain, Portugal and Italy saw their volumes divided by 2.6 between 2007 and 2012. It would appear
that the low point was hit in 2013, as the market showed a significant growth between 2013 and 2015
(nearly doubled). Despite this, it still remains far from the pre-crisis levels with 406,379 units in 2016
versus 561,000 in 2007 (down 27.6%).
• The group of the other main European countries (composed of France, Germany, UK, Belgium, The
Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland and Luxembourg) records a strong correlation between sales evolutions
and GDP growth. Sharp decline of LCV sales in 2009 following the decline of the GDP growth rate, then
rise through 2011. Decline in terms of sales volume in 2012 and 2013. Turnaround in 2014 with an
increase of +23.8% compared with the previous period.
19
Context
Special case of the Czech Republic where the collapse in the number of recorded LCV for the 2009 – 2010 period is explained by a change in the law. A law was enforced (87/2009 Sb) which extended to all vehicles the possibility of getting a tax rebate. Previously, this benefit was reserved to LCVs. We therefore observed a transfer of demand from LCVs to PCs. Sales volumes were thus divided by 4 in 2 years (between 2008 and 2010).
No significant evolution in terms of LCVs sales between 2010 and 2013.
Market turnaround in 2014: LCV sales increase by 64.9% between 2013 and 2016.
Sales evolution of light commercial vehicles in the Czech Republic, base 100 in 2007 on the scale to the right compared to
the European GDP growth rate evolution on the scale to the left
20
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
CZ Real GPD Growth rate, EU28 @Eurostat
21
B – MAIN RESULTS
22
#1 – European companies' confidence for the coming years European fleet managers interviewed in the survey are globally confident with the fleet growth potential for the next three
years. The balance between the fleet managers who expect an increase and the fleet managers who expect a decrease is
equal to +11 (quite steady compared with 2015 score).
Like in previous waves of the CVO survey, fleet managers of Large and very large companies are more optimistic than the
others, getting respectively a balance score of +14 and +15. On this segment, the balance score is even more high in the UK,
Poland (+24), Italy and Belgium (+23) contrary to Germany, at the end of the ranking with a negative balance (-1).
On average, European companies keep their vehicles in fleet 5.9 years before reselling them. Small fleet as well as ‘small and
medium companies’ have a lower vehicles turnover and keep them 6.5 years on average.
Germany, France and Luxembourg are the countries that keep their vehicles the shortest duration before reselling them
(respectively 3.6, 4.1 and 4.2 years on average for large fleets). On the opposite, Poland, Spain and Swiss companies keep
them the longest (from 7.3 to 7.8 on average for small fleets).
MAIN RESULTS (1/4)
23
#2 – Operating leasing, different use in Europe
As in previous years we can note a clear positive relation between the company size and the use of Operating leasing as
main financing method. Indeed, larger the companies are, the more they are to use Operating leasing as their main financing
method. If 14% of European companies with Small fleet use Operating leasing, they are more than half of companies
with large fleet (more than 50 vehicles) to use it (56%).
Nevertheless, disparities by country should be noticed:
- Concerning large fleets (more than 50 vehicles), with 64% to 72% of companies using Operating Leasing as their main
financing method, Spain, Belgium, The Netherlands, France, Italy and Germany reach the higher penetrations (on the
opposite, Switzerland, Luxembourg and Poland reach the lowest penetrations)
- Concerning small fleets (less than 10 vehicles), only Germany and Spain already register higher penetration in terms of
Operating Leasing (with respectively 35% and 22% versus 15% for the whole Europe) ; on the opposite, Poland and Portugal
reach the lower penetration (6% for both countries).
All company sizes segments register an upward trend of Operating Leasing. Since 2013, it increases of respectively +2,
+3, +4 and +4 points in small, medium, large and very large companies. The proportion of companies using it as their main
financing method reached 44% for large and very large companies and 52% in very large companies.
Globally, in the whole Europe area, the intention to develop Operating Leasing (in the next three years) is about 24% (with 9%
of companies who declare it certainly). Poland get the highest intention rate (43%), followed by France, Italy (32%) and
Luxemburg (30%).
The analysis by segment highlights various dynamisms. Concerning the large fleets, Belgium already reaches an high
penetration of Operating Leasing but still intend to develop it whereas in Spain, with an high penetration of Operating
Leasing, only few fleet managers declare having the intention to develop it in the next 3 years. In Poland, large fleet
doesn’t reach an high penetration of Operating Leasing but a lot of polish fleets managers declare having the intention to
develop it.
Regarding small fleets, Germany already reach an high penetration of Operating Leasing but only few fleet managers
declare having the intention to develop it in the next 3 years. France and Italy reaches standard penetration of Operating
Leasing but an higher proportion of fleet managers intend to develop it in the next 3 years.
MAIN RESULTS (2/4)
24
MAIN RESULTS (3/4)
#3 – Hybrid energies, 1rst alternative technology consider to be used in Europe
Globally, the development of new energies / technologies in fleet has increased since 2015 in the whole Europe area
whatever the company size (+5 points). Main evolutions are observed on:
- Plug-in hybrid : +7 points of companies that already implement or consider to implement that technology (20% versus 13%)
- Hybrid: +5 points (26% versus 21%)
- Electric vehicle: +5 points (21% versus 16%)
Among new or alternative energies, hybrid vehicle is the main technology already implemented in fleet (12%) or that will be
considered to be used in the next three years (26%).
The Netherlands and the UK are the most interested countries in the use of these new energies / technologies (respectively
62% and 56% of their fleet managers declare having already implemented or considered to implement it). Moreover we can
note an increasing interest since 2015 for these clean energies (respectively +14 and +7 points). The highest increase is
observed in Italy with a +17 evolution (mainly due to an high increase of Hybrid consideration: +20 points). Most of the
countries surveyed registers positive increase rate in terms of implementation and consideration of these new or alternative
energies between 2017 and 2015 (except Switzerland, Czech Republic and Germany).
#4 – Telematics: significant disparities between countries
Regarding Telematics use (without including data transmission by the mean of users Smartphone), the European average
(20%) hides important differences between countries taking part of the survey.
Poland (35%), the UK (34%), Czech Rep. (32%), The Netherlands (30%) and Spain (20%) get the highest level of the
Europe area. In the opposite, France (11%), Switzerland (10%) and Germany (8%) are less equipped than other countries.
More the fleet/company size is important more the Telematics is implemented in fleets: 37% among fleets with more than 50
vehicles versus only 12% among fleets with less than 10 vehicles.
Even if the main purpose for implementing telematics is related to the vehicle location (68%), several other reasons are given
by fleets managers: in one hand, optimize journeys (54%), reducing fleet costs (50%) and in the other hand, improve
driver safety (52%) and behavior (50%). This pattern is similar whatsoever the country surveyed.
The main telematics provider is closely related with the country. It will mainly be a telecom company in France, Portugal,
Belgium or Czech Republic. In Germany and Switzerland, it will mainly be a car manufacturer. In the Italy, it is often the
leaser or lessor. In the UK, it will be more often a car part supplier.
25
#5 – Mobility alternatives
45% of European companies are already using or considering to use in the next 3 years mobility alternatives like car
sharing, ride sharing and mobility budget. Larger companies and larger fleets are logically more numerous to use such
alternatives: at least one for 66% of large fleets (50 vehicles or more in fleets) versus 34% for small fleets (less than 10
vehicles in fleets) and 64% for the very large companies (500/1000 employees or more) versus 29% for small companies
(less than 10 employees).
The UK, Czech Republic, Switzerland, and in a lesser extend France and The Netherlands are the countries who already
use or declare the highest interest to use at least one of alternative mobility solutions in the future (among car sharing, ride
sharing and mobility card or budget). On the other hand, Germany get the lowest rate of the survey (only 26% of companies
having implemented or considering to implement at least one of these three mobility alternatives).
Globally we note that ride sharing is already implemented in 23% of our European companies sample. This alternative
mobility solutions is particularly developed in Czech Republic and in the UK (respectively 36% and 33% already used).
Czech Republic is the only country where ‘mobility budget’ is already strongly used in companies (44% versus 16% for the
whole Europe area).
However, companies are not yet ready to give up company cars for such alternatives with only 13% of fleet managers
declaring it. The Netherlands and Switzerland are the countries with the highest proportion of companies to be ready to
give up at least part of their fleet vehicles for such alternatives (with respectively 21% and 20% of the fleet managers
declaring yes certainly or yes probably). On the other hand, Spain, Germany and in a lesser extend Poland, UK, Czech
Republic and Portugal appears to be most reluctant (with scores of 4%, 9%, 10%, 11% 11% and 12%).
MAIN RESULTS (4/4)
26
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET
I
27
A – FLEET ASPECT
Number of vehicles in fleet
10 to 99 vehicles
100 to 499 vehicles
500 vehicles and more
28
A5. Can you please tell me the total number of vehicles of less than 3.5 tons in your fleet? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
1 to 9 vehicles
Total
3% 15% 9% 10%
29% 34%
1%
34%
64%
47% 54%
99%
66%
26%
9%
29
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
1 to 9 vehicles 86% 80% 90% 90% 92% 93% 90% 96% 87% 78% 86% 63% 86%
10 to 99 vehicles 14% 19% 10% 10% 8% 7% 9% 4% 13% 22% 14% 38% 14%
100 to 499 vehicles <1% 1% - - - - 1% - - - - - -
More than 500
vehicles - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1 to 9 vehicles 19% 7% 30% 21% 18% 35% 12% 32% 15% 11% 26% - 19%
10 to 99 vehicles 57% 56% 57% 66% 50% 40% 53% 45% 66% 54% 63% 80% 47%
100 to 499 vehicles 18% 30% 11% 11% 18% 17% 24% 19% 18% 27% 8% 16% 21%
More than 500
vehicles 6% 6% 2% 3% 14% 8% 11% 4% 1% 8% 3% 4% 12%
+
Number of vehicles in fleet
+
Increase Decrease Balance
2014
Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease
Fleet growth potential by company size
Balance
2013 Balance
2017
+11 +10 +9 +5
+8 +4 +6 +3
+9 +9 +6 +8
+14 +10 +10 +6
+15 +20 +15 +3
30
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Balance
2015
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…
Total 18%
13%
14%
21%
26%
7%
5%
5%
7%
11%
6%
12%
19%
16%
23%
10%
21%
5%
9%
5%
8%
6%
6%
3%
31
Balance 2017
+8
+8
+4
+10
+5
+2
+1
+3
+15
+8
+17
+4
+18
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…
Balance 2017
Fleet growth potential by company size
13%
13%
11%
13%
8%
4%
5%
5%
7%
3%
3%
2%
Increase Decrease
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
+
32
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…
Fleet growth potential by company size
+
18%
30%
26%
23%
29%
19%
39%
11%
7%
6%
15%
5%
12%
14%
Balance 2017
+14
+23
+3
+16
-1
+18
+7
+23
+20
+8
+24
+7
+24
Balance 2017
23%
29%
17%
19%
8%
24%
9%
6%
14%
3%
9%
6%
Increase Decrease
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
Increase Decrease
Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease
Fleet growth potential by fleet size
Balance
2017
33
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Total +11
+7
+13
+19
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…
18%
12%
21%
29%
7%
5%
8%
10%
34
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…
Fleet growth potential by fleet size
6%
15%
20%
12%
22%
8%
18%
6%
9%
6%
5%
6%
3%
5%
Balance 2017
+7
+4
+3
+10
+3
+3
0
+6
+14
+7
+16
+5
+13
Balance 2017
12%
9%
10%
12%
6%
6%
5%
5%
7%
2%
3%
3%
Increase Decrease
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
35
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…
Fleet growth potential by fleet size
18%
24%
21%
24%
28%
17%
37%
10%
6%
5%
15%
3%
10%
13%
Balance 2017
+13
+14
+3
+17
+2
+20
+8
+18
+16
+8
+25
+7
+24
Balance 2017
21%
20%
17%
21%
7%
24%
8%
6%
14%
4%
5%
3%
Increase Decrease
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
36
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…
Fleet growth potential by fleet size
18%
37%
30%
28%
41%
20%
50%
9%
4%
3%
16%
12%
16%
13%
Balance 2017
+19
+35
+9
+16
-1
+27
+9
+33
+27
+11
+29
+4
+38
Balance 2017
29%
40%
25%
16%
13%
34%
10%
5%
15%
15%
7%
Increase Decrease
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
37
A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
How long the company keeps its vehicles before
reselling them by fleet size
Average
in years
5.9 6.3 7.1 6.0 4.9 6.7 5.1 6.2 4.8 5.7 7.1 6.2 4.5
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
6.5 6.7 7.3 6.1 5.4 7.7 6.2 7.0 5.0 6.5 7.8 7.1 4.9
5.5 6.3 6.8 6.0 4.8 5.3 3.8 4.8 4.8 5.1 6.4 6.2 4.6
4.7 5.7 6.7 5.7 3.6 4.3 4.1 4.8 4.2 4.7 5.3 4.7 3.6
Total
38
A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
How long the company keeps its vehicles before
reselling them by company size
Average
in years
5.9 6.3 7.1 6.0 4.9 6.7 5.1 6.2 4.8 5.7 7.1 6.2 4.5
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
6.5 6.5 7.4 6.1 5.5 8.3
6.1 7.2 4.8 6.5 7.7 6.8
4.9
5.2 6.1 6.9 5.9 4.1 5.0 4.1 5.2 4.7 4.7 6.3 5.6 4.2
Total
+
+
39
A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences
Total 89% 8% 3%
No consequence Yes, few consequences Yes, many consequences
92%
91%
88%
84%
5%
8%
10%
13%
3%
1%
2%
3%
91%
88%
83%
6%
10%
14%
3%
2%
3%
40
A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences
total
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
89%
86%
87%
95%
83%
86%
8%
12%
9%
5%
11%
10%
3%
2%
4%
6%
4%
85%
92%
81%
95%
95%
93%
90%
11%
6%
14%
4%
4%
6%
10%
4%
2%
5%
1%
1%
1%
41
A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences
by fleet size
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
91%
89%
90%
95%
86%
93%
6%
8%
6%
4%
8%
4%
3%
3%
4%
1%
6%
3%
87%
93%
80%
97%
97%
97%
93%
11%
5%
13%
2%
3%
3%
7%
2%
2%
7%
1%
42
A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences
by fleet size
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
88%
89%
78%
95%
85%
80%
10%
8%
17%
5%
12%
17%
2%
3%
5%
3%
3%
80%
92%
83%
94%
95%
93%
87%
17%
6%
13%
6%
4%
6%
13%
3%
2%
4%
1%
1%
43
A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences
by fleet size
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
83%
77%
87%
94%
74%
68%
14%
23%
10%
6%
19%
25%
3%
3%
7%
7%
82%
86%
80%
95%
91%
84%
83%
9%
10%
20%
5%
6%
10%
15%
9%
4%
3%
6%
2%
44
A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences
by company size
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
+
92%
88%
94%
95%
86%
93%
6%
8%
4%
4%
8%
5%
2%
4%
2%
1%
6%
2%
87%
95%
79%
96%
97%
95%
94%
11%
3%
14%
3%
3%
5%
6%
2%
2%
7%
1%
45
A26. Did Volkswagen’s Dieselgate have consequences for your car policy regarding models or CO2 limits ? – NEW 2017
Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Volkswagen’s Dieselgate consequences
by company size
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
+
86%
83%
79%
95%
80%
80%
11%
17%
15%
5%
14%
15%
3%
6%
6%
5%
82%
90%
83%
95%
95%
90%
84%
12%
9%
14%
5%
4%
7%
15%
6%
1%
3%
1%
3%
1%
46
B – ENERGY
Development potential of new energies or
technologies since last year
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
47
% present and future use …
+
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
21%
19%
12%
9%
8%
4%
3%
3%
4%
5%
9%
7%
1%
1%
40%
35%
26%
21%
20%
13%
7%
7%
8%
8%
21%
16%
6%
5%
Already implemented + considered
Considered in the next 3 years
Already implemented
12%
10%
5%
4%
3%
1%
2%
1%
3%
3%
3%
3%
-
1%
31%
26%
19%
15%
14%
9%
5%
5%
8%
7%
14%
10%
5%
4%
Already implemented + considered
32%
30%
20%
16%
14%
8%
5%
5%
5%
7%
15%
12%
1%
1%
50%
45%
34%
29%
26%
18%
10%
9%
9%
10%
29%
23%
7%
6%
Already implemented + considered
+ Total
Development potential of new energies or
technologies since last year
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
48
% present and future use …
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
2017
2015
Already implemented + considered
Considered in the next 3 years
Already implemented
Already implemented + considered
Already implemented + considered
Total
21%
19%
12%
9%
8%
4%
3%
3%
4%
5%
9%
7%
1%
1%
40%
35%
26%
21%
20%
13%
7%
7%
8%
8%
21%
16%
6%
5%
Already implemented + considered
11%
11%
5%
3%
3%
1%
2%
2%
3%
4%
3%
3%
-
1%
30%
25%
18%
14%
13%
8%
5%
5%
8%
7%
14%
10%
5%
4%
26%
23%
14%
11%
10%
6%
3%
4%
3%
5%
10%
8%
1%
1%
43%
38%
28%
23%
21%
15%
7%
9%
7%
9%
22%
17%
4%
6%
45%
42%
31%
28%
22%
13%
8%
6%
7%
7%
24%
19%
2%
1%
63%
58%
46%
42%
37%
26%
14%
10%
12%
12%
41%
34%
11%
7%
49
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% Already implemented + considered
% present and future use …
40% 62% 56% 52% 50% 48% 43% 39% 31% 31% 26% 25% 15%
FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU
Development potential of new energies or
technologies At least one technology
Evolution vs 2015
EU
+5% +14% +7% +17% +7% -2% +7% +3% +6% +1% -3% +7% -2%
50
26% 47% 46% 37% 30% 30% 30% 26% 21% 15% 14% 13% 4%
Development potential of new energies or
technologies Hybrid / Plug-in Hybrid
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100% % Already implemented
+ considered
20% 17% 19% 37% 46%
8% 35%
- 10% 8% 13% 20% 22%
Hybrid
Plug-in
Hybrid
% present and future use …
FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU EU
EU
Evolution vs 2015
+5% +10% +10% +3% +3% +6% +20% -12% +4% +1% +5% +6% -
Evolution vs 2015
+6% +6% +15% +14% +17% -1% +10% -1% - +5% +6% -4% +11%
FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU
51
Development potential of new energies or
technologies CNG / LPG
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% Already implemented + considered
% present and future use …
CNG
LPG
7% 17% 13% 13% 9% 8% 7% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2%
8% 21% 19% 16% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3%
FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU
NL UK LU FR BE CH DE PT ES IT PL CZ
Evolution vs 2015
- +4% -8% +4% +2% +2% -1% +4% -3% -0% -4% -2% +1%
Evolution vs 2015
+1% +8% +7% +5% - +2% -6% - +2% -1% -3% - -4%
EU
EU
52
Development potential of new energies or
technologies Electric / Fuel Cell Electric - Hydrogen
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% present and future use …
% Already implemented + considered Electric
21% 35% 33% 32% 29% 25% 21% 20% 18% 16% 15% 4% 2%
6% 20% 10% 7% 6% 6% 6% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1%
FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH LU
NL UK LU FR BE CH DE PT ES IT PL CZ
FCE
Hydrogen
Evolution vs 2015
+5% +10% +5% +4% +7% +11% +13% - - -1% +9% - -3%
Evolution vs 2015
+1% +9% +10% -1% +1% -2% -1% +4% -2% - -3% -2% -1%
EU
EU
53
FINANCING
II
39%
46%
34%
24%
7%
11%
4%
1%
26%
29%
26%
19%
28%
14%
36%
56%
54
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Main financing method by fleet size
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
Total
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies
55
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Main financing method
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
39%
35%
60%
51%
30%
34%
7%
14%
6%
11%
6%
9%
26%
17%
24%
24%
17%
20%
28%
34%
10%
14%
47%
37%
24%
28%
28%
49%
46%
35%
47%
14%
5%
8%
1%
5%
6%
2%
24%
36%
38%
13%
40%
39%
21%
38%
31%
26%
37%
9%
20%
30%
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies
Total
56
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Main financing method by fleet size
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
45%
47%
58%
55%
36%
42%
11%
25%
8%
14%
8%
13%
29%
18%
26%
27%
21%
23%
15%
10%
8%
4%
35%
22%
24%
35%
28%
73%
48%
41%
58%
26%
8%
11%
1%
6%
10%
3%
33%
40%
43%
12%
40%
43%
21%
17%
17%
18%
14%
6%
6%
18%
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies
57
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Main financing method by fleet size
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
35%
32%
59%
43%
28%
23%
4%
8%
4%
9%
5%
2%
26%
22%
20%
25%
25%
17%
35%
38%
17%
23%
42%
58%
21%
14%
31%
32%
44%
34%
39%
3%
1%
6%
3%
3%
3%
21%
32%
29%
15%
45%
38%
20%
55%
53%
34%
53%
8%
25%
38%
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies
58
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Main financing method by fleet size
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
23%
14%
64%
44%
17%
15%
1%
2%
2%
2%
1%
19%
13%
24%
11%
17%
9%
57%
73%
10%
43%
64%
75%
23%
14%
23%
17%
36%
20%
25%
2%
10%
22%
38%
11%
30%
29%
23%
67%
64%
37%
72%
34%
51%
52%
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies
59
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Main financing method by company size
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
45%
44%
55%
54%
38%
45%
12%
25%
10%
16%
9%
14%
29%
19%
28%
26%
15%
25%
14%
12%
7%
4%
38%
16%
26%
36%
27%
69%
44%
40%
59%
26%
9%
10%
1%
6%
9%
4%
33%
41%
43%
13%
44%
42%
20%
15%
14%
20%
17%
6%
9%
17%
+
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies
60
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Main financing method by company size
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles… +
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
EU
BE
CH
CZ
DE
ES
FR
IT
LU
NL
PL
PT
UK
31%
23%
64%
46%
22%
23%
2%
2%
2%
5%
2%
2%
23%
16%
20%
22%
18%
13%
44%
59%
14%
27%
58%
62%
21%
18%
28%
27%
47%
29%
31%
1%
5%
3%
2%
1%
14%
29%
33%
12%
37%
35%
22%
65%
52%
34%
61%
13%
34%
46%
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies
Evolution of the main financing method by company size
61
47% 46% 46% 46% 45%
11% 11% 11% 11% 12%
30% 31%
31% 30% 29%
12% 12% 12% 13% 14%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles… +
62
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles… +
Evolution of the main financing method by company size
31% 31% 29%
31% 31%
3% 2% 3% 2% 2%
26% 26% 27% 25%
23%
40% 41% 41% 42% 44%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
Evolution of the main financing method by company size
63
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
50% 48%
47%
46% 46%
13% 13% 13% 14% 14%
28% 30% 31% 30% 29%
9% 9% 9% 10% 11%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
Evolution of the main financing method by company size
64
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
43% 44% 44% 44% 43%
8% 8% 8% 8% 8%
32% 31% 31% 30% 29%
17% 17% 17% 18% 20%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
65
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
Evolution of the main financing method by company size
34% 33% 35% 34% 34%
3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
29% 28% 28% 27% 25%
34% 36%
34% 36%
38%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
66
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
Evolution of the main financing method by company size
28% 26% 26% 27% 28%
2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
22% 23% 24% 22%
19%
48% 49% 49% 50% 52%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
Evolution of the main financing method by fleet size
67
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
48% 48%
46%
46% 45%
11% 10% 11% 11% 11%
29% 30% 30% 29% 29%
12% 12% 13% 14% 15%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
Evolution of the main financing method by fleet size
68
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
34%
33% 32% 33%
35%
3% 3% 4% 4% 4%
31% 30% 30% 28% 26%
32%
34% 34% 35% 35%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
69
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of the main financing method used to finance company vehicles…
Evolution of the main financing method by fleet size
25% 25% 24% 23% 23%
2% 1% 1% 1% 1%
20% 21% 23%
21% 19%
53% 53% 52% 55%
57%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating leasing Finance leasing Car credit Self purchase*
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Data have been consolidated: 3 years average for large and very large companies. Results provided for 2016 are calculated by the mean of an extrapolation between the results of the years 2015 and 2017.
70
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…
Intention to develop Operating leasing
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
9% 16% 6% 6% 3% 4%
17% 8% 15% 9% 17%
5% 6%
24% 29%
15% 19%
12% 20%
32% 32% 30%
18%
43%
23% 20%
% YES
Yes probably
Yes certainly
Reminder
OL as main
financing method 28% 34% 10% 14% 47% 37% 38% 31% 26% 37% 9% 20% 30%
Total
71
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…
Intention to develop Operating leasing by company size
+
Yes probably
Yes certainly
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
% YES
Reminder
OL as main
financing method 14% 12% 7% 4% 38% 16% 15% 14% 20% 17% 6% 9% 17%
21% 22% 12% 12% 9%
21% 27% 35%
23% 10%
43%
18% 21%
27% 30%
16% 14% 12%
25%
35% 42%
35%
15%
58%
20% 26%
72
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…
Intention to develop Operating leasing by company size
+
Yes probably
Yes certainly
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
% YES
Reminder
OL as main
financing method 44% 59% 14% 27% 58% 62% 65% 52% 34% 60% 13% 34% 46%
28% 36%
17% 26%
16% 19% 38%
28% 39%
27% 44%
29% 19%
41%
60%
26%
37%
19% 22%
64%
36%
58%
42%
62%
36%
27%
73
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…
Intention to develop Operating leasing by fleet size
Yes probably
Yes certainly
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
% YES
Reminder
OL as main
financing method 15% 10% 8% 4% 35% 22% 17% 17% 18% 14% 6% 6% 18%
20% 21% 12% 11% 8%
18% 24% 34%
22% 8%
37%
14% 21%
25% 27%
15% 13% 10%
20%
32% 39%
31%
11%
51%
16%
27%
74
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…
Intention to develop Operating leasing by fleet size
Yes probably
Yes certainly
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
% YES
Reminder
OL as main
financing method 35% 38% 17% 23% 42% 58% 55% 53% 34% 53% 8% 25% 38%
28% 30% 16%
28% 10%
34% 44%
32% 38% 21%
47%
26% 15%
40% 45%
24%
37%
12%
42%
66%
48%
66%
31%
63%
30%
18%
75
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of intention to develop Operating leasing in the next three years…
Intention to develop Operating leasing by fleet size
Yes probably
Yes certainly
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
% YES
Reminder
OL as main
financing method 57% 73% 10% 43% 64% 75% 67% 64% 37% 72% 34% 51% 52%
33% 41% 25% 32% 26%
10%
39% 22%
44% 34%
65%
33% 23%
51%
73%
43% 54%
32%
12%
69%
31%
58% 54%
100%
43% 33%
Global fleet growth potential in the next 3 years
according to main financing method
Operating
leasing
Finance
leasing
Car credit
Self purchase*
76
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will…
B2. What is the main financing method used to finance your company vehicles today? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Increase Decrease
Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease
Balance 2017
+8
+9
+14
+14
14%
14%
20%
23%
6%
5%
6%
9%
*Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit)
Total % which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will…
77
TELEMATICS
III
Use of Telematics
78
E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...
from vehicles on the move. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
20% 14% 10%
32%
8% 20%
11% 16% 15%
30% 35%
15%
34%
Total
% YES
Use of Telematics
79
E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...
from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box
installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Total
20% 12%
25% 37%
% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…
% YES
Use of Telematics by fleet size
80
E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...
from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box
installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
12% 9% 5% 21%
2% 10% 6% 8% 10% 20% 23%
5% 17%
% YES
Use of Telematics by fleet size
81
E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...
from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box
installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
25% 16% 13%
41%
5% 34%
11%
30% 16%
27% 43%
18%
48%
% YES
Use of Telematics by fleet size
82
E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...
from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box
installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
37%
19% 25%
59%
26%
46%
22% 35%
26%
51%
76%
24%
62%
% YES
Use of Telematics
83
E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle location...
from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box
installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Total
20% 9%
19% 25%
33%
% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…
% YES
Use of Telematics by company size
84
E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour,
vehicle location... from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted by the mean of an original or
an after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
13% 12% 6% 19%
3% 8% 9% 10% 9%
23% 22%
10% 21%
+
% YES
Use of Telematics by company size
85
E23. Have you implemented Telematics in part of your fleet? Telematics enables data transmission to monitor fuel consumption,
driver behaviour, vehicle location... from vehicles on the move. New precision added for the 2017 questionnaire: Data are transmitted
by the mean of an original or an after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not include data transmission by
the mean of the users’ smartphones. Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% which has implemented telematics in their fleet…
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
28%
16% 14%
47%
14%
34%
13% 24% 22%
39% 50%
20%
49%
+
% YES
86
E23b. And could you tell me who is the supplier of your telematics ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies which has implemented telematics
Supplier of Telematics
Who is the supplier of your Telematics
%YES
Vehicles bought were already equipped with Telematics by
the car manufacturer
You asked a car part supplier like Valeo, Bosh or
Delphi to provide you with Telematics
Vehicles were equipped with telematics by your car leaser
or lessor
You asked a Telecom company for a Telematic
solution
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
16% 2% 25% 19%
36% 27%
12%
37% 24%
6% 6% 20%
11%
17% 27%
21% 14% 4%
32% 15%
8% 21% 17% 8% 7%
29%
27% 39%
24% 29% 4%
18%
59%
20% 24% 17% 26%
59%
20%
Total
16% 20% 10% 8%
20% 25% 15%
53%
6% 19% 8% 9% 16%
87
E23b. And could you tell me who is the supplier of your telematics ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies which has implemented telematics
Supplier of Telematics
Who is the supplier of your Telematics
%YES
Total
16% 21% 14% 14%
Vehicles bought were already equipped with Telematics by the
car manufacturer
You asked a car part supplier like Valeo, Bosh or Delphi to provide
you with Telematics
Vehicles were equipped with telematics by your car leaser or
lessor
You asked a Telecom company for a Telematic solution
17% 15% 18% 19%
16% 14% 16% 19%
27% 23% 30% 28%
88
E23b. And could you tell me who is the supplier of your telematics ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies which has implemented telematics
Supplier of Telematics by fleet size
Who is the supplier of your Telematics
%YES
Vehicles bought were already equipped with Telematics by
the car manufacturer
You asked a car part supplier like Valeo, Bosh or
Delphi to provide you with Telematics
Vehicles were equipped with telematics by your car leaser
or lessor
You asked a Telecom company for a Telematic
solution
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
21% 8%
39% 22%
50% 43% 20%
47% 34%
- 10% 20% 11%
15% 15% 7% 3% - 24%
- 18% 21% 20% 15% - 29%
23% 38%
24% 24% - 10%
70%
29% 6% 17% 15%
80%
21%
14% 8% - 8% - 14% 20% 41%
17% 17% 10% - 14%
89
E23b. And could you tell me who is the supplier of your telematics ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies which has implemented telematics
Who is the supplier of your Telematics
Supplier of Telematics by fleet size
%YES
Vehicles bought were already equipped with Telematics by
the car manufacturer
You asked a car part supplier like Valeo, Bosh or
Delphi to provide you with Telematics
Vehicles were equipped with telematics by your car leaser
or lessor
You asked a Telecom company for a Telematic
solution
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
14% -
27% 14% -
25% 14%
40% 26%
4% 3% 19% 9%
18% 38%
17% 8% 33% 35%
14% 7% 16% 17% 3% 11% 38%
30% 54%
17% 30%
- 15%
57%
20% 16% 17% 35%
52% 24%
16% 23% 20% 5%
33% 35% 14%
53%
- 17%
8% 11% 12%
90
E23b. And could you tell me who is the supplier of your telematics ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies which has implemented telematics
Who is the supplier of your Telematics
Supplier of Telematics by fleet size
%YES
Vehicles bought were already equipped with Telematics by
the car manufacturer
You asked a car part supplier like Valeo, Bosh or Delphi to provide you with Telematics
Vehicles were equipped with telematics by your car leaser
or lessor
You asked a Telecom company for a Telematic
solution
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
14% - 10% 23%
39%
11% 6% 24% 12% 12% 4%
25% 13%
19% 27% 39% 41%
-
37% 24%
- 24%
15% 8% - 23%
28% 27% 30% 36%
6% 32%
53%
12%
52%
17% 31%
67%
15%
19% 27% 10% 14%
22% 26% 12%
65%
- 22%
4% 8% 20%
91
Purposes for using Telematics
E25. For which reasons do you use Telematics in your company ? – NEW 2017 Basis : use telematics = 100%
Reasons for using Telematics
%YES
To locate vehicles
To optimize journeys
To improve drivers safety
To improve drivers behaviours
To reduce fleet costs
68%
54%
52%
50%
55%
Total
64%
52%
55%
55%
61%
74%
53%
53%
49%
57%
68%
57%
49%
47%
47%
92
Purposes for using Telematics
E25. For which reasons do you use Telematics in your company ? – NEW 2017 Basis : use telematics = 100%
Reasons for using Telematics
%YES
To locate vehicles
To optimize journeys
To improve drivers safety
To improve drivers behaviours
To reduce fleet costs
68%
54%
52%
50%
55%
Total
61%
52%
56%
49%
59%
71%
56%
52%
56%
60%
78%
59%
46%
47%
49%
65%
46%
53%
44%
44%
93
Purposes for using Telematics by company size
E25. For which reasons do you use Telematics in your company ? – NEW 2017 Basis : use telematics = 100%
Reasons for using Telematics
%YES
52% 46% 38% 51% 28% 45% 68% 53% 55% 24% 54% 50% 88%
To improve drivers safety
To improve drivers behaviours
To locate vehicles
To optimize journeys
To reduce fleet costs
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
68% 59% 49% 66% 36% 53% 94%
47% 83% 59% 78% 68% 91%
55% 29% 25% 67% 48% 43% 76% 51% 53% 41% 58% 57% 76%
54% 41% 37% 64% 32% 42% 71% 47% 67% 57% 45% 43% 70%
50% 41% 28% 53% 16% 25% 88%
35% 54% 37% 50% 34% 93%
Small
basis
Total
94
PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF
MOBILITY
VI
95
Development potential of alternatives mobility
solutions by fleet size
MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% present and future use …
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or
card
Already using + considered
Total
18%
23%
16%
23%
28%
23%
32%
35%
23%
42%
43%
33%
23%
29%
20%
27%
33%
27%
10%
17%
12%
14%
21%
17%
ST At least one alternative
(Already using or considered) 45% 34% 54% 66%
96
MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% present and future use …
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
Development potential of alternatives mobility
solutions by company size
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget
or card
Already using + considered
Total
7%
13%
9%
11%
17%
14%
13%
23%
14%
17%
27%
20%
23%
28%
19%
28%
34%
27%
33%
34%
27%
41%
42%
35%
18%
23%
16%
23%
28%
23%
ST At least one alternative
(Already using or considered) 45% 29% 43% 55% 64%
97
Development potential of Car sharing
MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% present and future use …
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
18% 13% 22%
28%
4% 12%
26%
9% 17% 18% 22% 19% 20%
23% 17%
29% 31%
10%
17%
28%
17% 20%
23% 24% 24% 29%
% YES
Total
Car sharing
98
Development potential of Ride sharing
MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% present and future use …
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
% YES
Total
Ride sharing
23% 23% 23%
36%
17% 16% 24%
16% 23%
29% 20% 21%
33%
28% 27% 33%
39%
21% 21%
29%
20%
26% 32%
24% 25%
42%
99
Development potential of Mobility budget
MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% present and future use …
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
% YES
Total
Mobility budget or card
16% 9% 13%
44%
8% 17% 14% 16% 17%
11% 19%
14% 11%
23% 24% 19%
47%
13%
23% 17%
27%
20% 19%
26%
19% 19%
100
Development potential of alternatives
MM9. In the next three years, would you consider using the following alternatives? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% present and future use …
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
% YES
Total
At least one alternative (used or considered in the next 3 years)
45% 46% 52%
60%
26%
40% 47% 43% 45% 47% 44% 42%
52%
101
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives (amongst all companies)
Yes probably
Yes certainly
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
Total
ST YES
2%
3%
2%
6%
7%
6%
4%
5%
4%
12%
13%
11%
1%
2%
1%
4%
5%
5%
3%
2%
2%
7%
8%
7%
Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their
company cars for alternative mobility solutions
by fleet size
ST At least one alternative
(Yes certainly or probably) 13% 9% 15% 22%
102
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives (amongst all companies)
Yes probably
Yes certainly
Total
ST YES
5%
5%
4%
11%
12%
11%
2%
2%
2%
7%
8%
8%
2%
2%
2%
5%
7%
6%
Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their
company cars for alternative mobility solutions
by company size
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
2%
3%
2%
6%
7%
6%
ST At least one alternative
(Yes certainly or probably) 13% 7% 13% 16% 21%
1%
2%
1%
2%
4%
4%
103
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK % YES
Total
Car sharing
Yes probably
Yes certainly
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives (amongst all companies)
2% 2% 5% 3% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1%
4% 2% 3% 1%
6% 6%
12%
6% 4%
2%
7% 8%
3%
9%
5% 7%
5%
Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their
company cars for Car sharing
104
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK % YES
Total
Ride sharing
Yes probably
Yes certainly
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives (amongst all companies)
3% 3% 4% 3% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1%
7% 2% 1% 1%
7% 8% 10%
7% 7%
3%
10%
4% 6%
14%
5% 6% 7%
Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their
company cars for Ride sharing
105
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK % YES
Total
Yes probably
Yes certainly
Mobility budget or card
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives (amongst all companies)
2% 2% 4% 4% 1% - 2% 3% 1% 4% 2% 1% -
6% 9%
6% 8%
5% 2%
4%
12% 9%
8% 5% 6%
4%
Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their
company cars for Mobility budget
106
EU BE CH CZ DE ES FR IT LU NL PL PT UK
13% 15% 20%
11% 9% 4%
15% 16% 15% 21%
10% 12% 11%
% YES
Total MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives ? – NEW 2017 Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
% of ready to give up all or part of company cars for alternatives (amongst all companies)
At least one alternative (certainly or probably)
Ride sharing, Car sharing or Mobility budget
Part of companies ready to give up all or part of their
company cars for alternative solutions
107
0%
10%
20%
20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Inte
nti
on
to
giv
e u
p a
ll o
r p
art
of
co
mp
an
y c
ars
fo
r at
least
on
e
alt
ern
ati
ve s
olu
tio
ns
(S
T c
ert
ain
ly +
pro
bably
) :
Car
sharin
g,
rid
e s
harin
g a
nd m
obili
ty b
udget
/ card
Part of companies already using or considering to use at least one
alternative solutions Car sharing, ride sharing and mobility budget / card
Perspective in terms of alternative mobility solutions
Forward-looking countries
Alternative solutions-
oriented countries but
company cars lovers No interest in
alternative
solutions
Already users but
not convinced to
give up company
cars yet
108
INFORMATION SOURCES
VI
109
T13. Which are your main sources of information when you are looking for technical information related to your fleet management (such as safety, specifications of
vehicle model, costs…)? Basis : companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Main sources of information when looking for technical
information related to fleet management
Information from car manufacturers
Websites
Information from long-term lessor / leasing company
Specialized press
Social Media
Blogs and consumers' feedbacks
Information from apps
59%
54%
29%
28%
17%
15%
10%
Total
Part of main sources of information…
71%
54%
49%
42%
19%
15%
13%
58%
51%
33%
28%
14%
12%
8%
56%
55%
20%
23%
17%
16%
10%
en savoir plus : www.csa.eu - @InstitutCSA 10, rue Godefroy - 92800 Puteaux Tel . : 01.57.00.58.00 - Fax : 01.57.00.58.01
110