· 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a...

8

Transcript of  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a...

Page 1:  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis
Page 2:  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis
Page 3:  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis
Page 4:  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis
Page 5:  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis
Page 6:  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis
Page 7:  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis
Page 8:  · 2017-11-14 · Kesling (1963, 1966) suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis