Newton Rowland Cane Ridge High School Metro Nashville Public Schools.
2016-10 Nashville Metro Report - Tennessee...Nashville Metro Public Health Department Air Monitoring...
Transcript of 2016-10 Nashville Metro Report - Tennessee...Nashville Metro Public Health Department Air Monitoring...
Quarterly Audit Report for
Nashville Metro Public Health Department
Air Monitoring Network
Prepared for:
Nashville Metro Public Health Department
2500 Charlotte Ave
Nashville, TN 37209
Prepared by:
1128 NW 39th Drive
Gainesville, FL 32605
November 2016
environmental engineering
& measurement services, inc.
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/LMAPCD i EEMS
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1-1
2.0 Audits of PM Samplers and Gaseous Pollutant Monitors ................................... 2-1
2.1 Audit Methods and Equipment .................................................................................... 2-1
2.1.1 Certification of EEMS Standards ....................................................................... 2-1
2.1.2 EPA Protocol Gas Standards and EEMS Mobile Laboratory ............................ 2-1
2.1.3 Level-2 Ozone Standard ..................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 Summary of Field Audit Activities .............................................................................. 2-2
2.3 Specific PM Sampler and Gaseous Monitor Audit Activities ...................................... 2-5
2.3.1 PM Sampler Audits ............................................................................................ 2-5
2.3.2 Gaseous Pollutant Monitor Audits ..................................................................... 2-5
2.3.3 Ozone Monitor Audits ........................................................................................ 2-7
2.3.4 Specific NO2 CO and SO2 Audit Activities........................................................ 2-8
3.0 Audit Results ............................................................................................................ 3-1
3.1 PM Audit Results ......................................................................................................... 3-1
3.2 NPAP-TTP Ozone Audit Results ................................................................................. 3-3
3.3 NPAP-TTP Sulfur Dioxide Audit Results ................................................................... 3-3
3.4 NPAP-TTP Carbon Monoxide Audit Results .............................................................. 3-4
3.5 NPAP-TTP Nitrogen Dioxide Audit Results ............................................................... 3-4
3.6 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 3-5
List of Tables
Table 1 Station Locations ............................................................................................................ 1-2
Table 2 Equipment Audited......................................................................................................... 1-2
Table 3 OAQPS Approved Audit Levels .................................................................................... 2-7
Table 4 Hillwood PM Sampler Verification ............................................................................... 3-1
Table 5 Lockeland PM Samplers Verifications ........................................................................... 3-2
Table 6 Ozone TTP Audit Results ............................................................................................... 3-3
Table 7 Sulfur Dioxide TTP Audit Results ................................................................................. 3-4
Table 8 Carbon Monoxide TTP Audit Results ............................................................................ 3-4
Table 9 Nitrogen Dioxide TTP Audit Results ............................................................................. 3-5
List of Figures
Figure 1 EEMS Mobile Laboratory ............................................................................................. 2-2
Figure 2 Hillwood PM Sampler .................................................................................................. 2-3
Figure 3 Lockeland PM Samplers ............................................................................................... 2-3
Figure 4 East Health Center and Mobile Lab .............................................................................. 2-4
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/LMAPCD ii EEMS
Figure 5 Near Road Station ......................................................................................................... 2-4
Figure 6 Near Road Audit Gas Delivery ..................................................................................... 2-5
Figure 7 East Health Center Audit Gas Delivery ........................................................................ 2-6
Figure 8 Percy Priest Dam Ozone Sample Inlet .......................................................................... 2-6
List of Appendices
Appendix A Audit Data Sheets
Appendix B Maps of Locations
Appendix C Audit Standards Certifications
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/LMAPCD iii EEMS
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CO carbon monoxide
DAS data acquisition system
EEMS Environmental, Engineering & Measurement Services, Inc.
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FRM Federal Reference Method
lpm liters per minute
mm Hg millimeters of mercury
MPHD Metro Public Health Department
mps meters per second
NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology
NO nitric oxide
NPAP National Performance Audit Program
OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
O3 Ozone
PE Performance Evaluation
PM particulate matter
PM2.5 particulate matter of 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter or less
PM10 particulate matter of 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter or less
ppm parts per million
PSD prevention of significant deterioration
QA quality assurance
rpm revolutions per minute
S/N serial number
SLAMS State or Local Air Monitoring Stations
SO2 sulfur dioxide
SOP standard operating procedure
TTP Through-The-Probe
μg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 1-1 EEMS
1.0 Introduction
Environmental, Engineering & Measurement Services, Inc. (EEMS) was contracted by the
Nashville Metro Public Health Department to conduct audits of the district’s local ambient air
quality gaseous and PM pollutant monitoring network. The air quality monitoring network
consists of five stations in the greater Nashville, Tennessee Metro Area which are operated by the
Metro Public Health Department (MPHD). The purpose of this network is to fulfill and comply
with specific monitoring requirements for State or Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS) as
specified by the EPA in 40 CFR Part 58. The operation of the monitoring stations must meet the
requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A, which defines the quality assurance (QA)
requirements for gaseous and PM pollutant ambient air monitoring. The audits performed by
EEMS under this contract fulfilled the requirement for quarterly independent audits of all
pollutant monitors in the network. The QA requirements can be found at:
http://www.epa.gov/ttnamti1/files/ambient/pm25/qa/appd_validation_template_amtic.pdf.
The trained and certified EEMS field scientist followed the National Performance Audit Program
(NPAP) procedures while performing audits of all air quality monitors.
The NPAP is a QA program implemented by the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards (OAQPS) to conduct audits of gaseous air pollutant analyzers by standard methods
throughout each region of the U.S. The method includes introduction of National Institute of
Standards and Traceability (NIST) audit gases to the station analyzers through the ambient
sample inlet, including all filters and fittings. This method evaluates the entire sample train. The
audit gas concentrations are also measured and verified with an audit analyzer on-site which is
calibrated at the time of the audit.
EEMS performed the NPAP Through-The-Probe (TTP) gas analyzer audits following EPA’s
Quality Assurance Guidance Document – Method Compendium – Field Standard Operating
Procedures (SOP) for the Federal PM2.5 Performance Evaluation Program and NPAP TTP Audit
SOP. All procedures and guidance documents used to perform these audits can be found at the
EPA OAQPS website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/.
This report includes the results of the NPAP TTP and PM sampler audits conducted from October
24th through October 26th, 2016. The ambient air quality monitors audited were operating at five
stations in the network:
1. Hillwood
2. Lockeland
3. Percy Priest Dam
4. East Health Center
5. Near Road
All stations are in the Nashville Metro area and in Davidson County, TN. Map images of the
sites are included in Appendix B.
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 1-2 EEMS
The monitoring station locations were obtained during the audit visits with a GPS and are
provided in Table 1.
Table 1 Station Locations
Site Latitude Longitude Elevation (meters)
Hillwood 36.118261 -86.873640 179
Lockeland 36.176280 -86.738982 161
Percy Priest Dam 36.150671 -86.623338 157
East Health Center 36.204696 -86.744816 167
Near Road 36.142337 -86.734112 159
The audited monitoring equipment operating at each site is presented in Table 2.
Table 2 Equipment Audited
Site Location Parameter Sampler Manufacture Model No. Serial No.
Hillwood #036 PM2.5 Thermo Environmental 2025i 0746-074745
Lockeland #023 PM2.5 Thermo Environmental 2025i 202512-02161204
Lockeland #223 PM2.5 Thermo Environmental 2025i 202512-02241204
Lockeland PM2.5 Thermo Environmental TEOM 1405 1405A-134931502
Percy Priest Dam Ozone Thermo Environmental 49i A2NAB 1322458652
East Health Center NOx Thermo Environmental 42i ANMSPAA 1153030011
East Health Center SO2 Thermo Environmental 43i AZSAB 1303156453
East Health Center Ozone Thermo Environmental 49i A3NCA CM09130037
Near Road NOx Thermo Environmental 42i TL-ANMSDAB 1324658812
Near Road CO Thermo Environmental 48i TLE-ACPAB 1324658815
Additional support materials operated at each of the stations include multi-gas dilution systems,
zero air generation systems, and NIST traceable calibration gases. The sites that measure ozone
also have level 3-certified standard photometers to verify Quality Check (QC) concentrations.
Details of the audits are presented in the following sections:
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 1-3 EEMS
Section 2.0 Audits of PM Samplers and Gaseous Pollutant Monitors
Section 3.0 Audit Results
Appendix A Audit Data Sheets
Appendix B Maps of Locations
Appendix C Audit Standards Certifications
The preparation of this report, and all the activities and tasks described in this report, were
performed by an accredited NPAP-TTP mobile lab Field Scientist. All procedures followed
during the audits were provided by OAQPS and are available at the OAQPS website:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/npepqa.html.
Any questions related to this audit or audit report should be addressed to:
Eric Hebert
EEMS Inc.
P.O. Box 357593
Gainesville, FL 32635
Telephone: 352-262-0802
Fax: 352-371-1144
E-mail: [email protected]
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 2-1 EEMS
2.0 Audits of PM Samplers and Gaseous Pollutant Monitors
2.1 Audit Methods and Equipment
This section describes the steps followed in the performance of these audits. EEMS followed the
document referenced above rigorously. Supplemental guidance and excerpts from the method
can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/npepqa.html.
2.1.1 Certification of EEMS Standards
All standards owned and maintained by EEMS undergo annual NIST traceable certification. The
standards include EPA Protocol Gas standards, digital multi-meters, meteorological sensors and
standards, and various flow rate measurement systems including two DeltaCal devices. Copies of
the annual certifications of the EEMS standards used for these audits are included in Appendix C.
2.1.2 EPA Protocol Gas Standards and EEMS Mobile Laboratory
EEMS owns and maintains a Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc. (TEI) 48i TLE carbon
monoxide analyzer which is used to verify standard audit gas concentrations during NPAP-TTP
audits. The CO analyzer is mounted and operated in a climate controlled mobile laboratory with a
multi-gas dilution system and NIST traceable EPA Protocol Gas standards. The NIST gases
include cylinders of ultra-pure air, high concentration CO, low concentration CO, and a multi-
blend NO, CO, SO2 mixture. The mobile laboratory is equipped with its own data acquisition
system (DAS). An image of the EEMS mobile laboratory is included in Figure 1.
2.1.3 Level-2 Ozone Standard
EEMS owns and maintains a Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc. (TEI) 49C level-2 ozone
standard photometer. The standard photometer is mounted and operated in the climate controlled
mobile laboratory with a multi-gas dilution system and other standards. The serial output of the
ozone standard is monitored and recorded by the mobile laboratory DAS.
The standard photometer is transported to Research Triangle Park (RTP) North Carolina, or one
of the EPA regional laboratories for verification at least twice per year. The most recent
verification with the Standard Reference Photometer (SRP) from EPA Region 7 is included in
Appendix C.
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 2-2 EEMS
Figure 1 EEMS Mobile Laboratory
2.2 Summary of Field Audit Activities
The MPHD air quality network operates PM samplers at two sites, Hillwood High School and
Lockeland Elementary School. On Monday October 24th, 2016, EEMS personnel met MPHD
personnel at the Hillwood site for the station’s PM2.5 sampler audits. Following the audit at
Hillwood, both EEMS and MPHD personnel traveled to the Lockeland site where the station’s
three operating PM samplers were audited.
After completing the PM sampler audits, EEMS personnel traveled to the Percy Priest Dam
station and met with additional MPHD personnel and performed the audit of the station’s ozone
monitor.
On Tuesday October 25th EEMS personnel met MPHD personnel at the East Public Health Center
and performed TTP audits of the Station’s ozone, NOx, and SO2 monitors.
On Wednesday October 26th EEMS personnel met MPHD personnel at the Near Road site and
performed TTP audits of the station’s NOx and CO monitors. While at the station a shelter
temperature sensor was installed in the serial port of the station’s DAS. The MPHD lab and
office was visited after completing the Near Road station audit to assist with configuration of the
new shelter temperature sensor.
Images of some of the sites and samplers are provided in Figures 2 through 5 below.
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 2-3 EEMS
Figure 2 Hillwood PM Sampler
Figure 3 Lockeland PM Samplers
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 2-4 EEMS
Figure 4 East Health Center and Mobile Lab
Figure 5 Near Road Station
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 2-5 EEMS
2.3 Specific PM Sampler and Gaseous Monitor Audit Activities
This section describes the procedures used for audits of each parameter at all sites. More detailed
NPAP-TTP audit procedures can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/npepqa.html.
2.3.1 PM Sampler Audits
The sampler dates and times were verified for all samplers and found to be within 2 minutes of
the actual time. The PM10 (first cut point) inlets were removed from the samplers and the EEMS
DeltaCal standard was installed at the inlet to the sample train. The samplers’ operational
variables (flow rate, temperature, and pressure) were compared to the variables as measured by
the standard. All variables were found within acceptance limits and audit results are included in
Section 3.
2.3.2 Gaseous Pollutant Monitor Audits
The EEMS mobile laboratory audit analyzers and systems were allowed to warm-up overnight
prior to each station audit. At sites that measure ozone, the TTP ozone audit was conducted first.
Following the ozone audit, the TTP NOx, CO, and/or SO2 audits were performed depending on
which parameters were being measured at the site. Audits of gaseous monitors other than ozone
were performed simultaneously by providing audit gas to both monitor inlets using Teflon “tee”
connectors or Teflon bag for the Near Road sample inlet. Images of the audit gas delivery system
are included in Figures 6 through 8 below.
Figure 6 Near Road Audit Gas Delivery
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 2-6 EEMS
Figure 7 East Health Center Audit Gas Delivery
Figure 8 Percy Priest Dam Ozone Sample Inlet
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 2-7 EEMS
All analyzer sample pressures and flow rates were checked prior to, and following the
introduction of audit gas to ensure that changes to the routine sampling variables did not occur as
a result of the addition of audit gas (test atmosphere) to the sampling inlet.
Audit test gas concentrations were selected from the OAQPS list of expanded audit levels
recently approved and included in the CFR part 58 revisions. Table 3 provides the approved
list of audit levels. Audit concentrations from at least three audit levels were selected for each
monitor audit. The final results of the NPAP TTP audits are included in Section 3.0.
Table 3 OAQPS Approved Audit Levels
Audit Level Concentration Range, ppm
O3 SO2 NO2 CO
1 0.004 - 0.0059 0.0003 - 0.0029 0.0003 - 0.0029 0.020 - 0.059
2 0.006 - 0.019 0.0030 - 0.0049 0.0030 - 0.0049 0.060 - 0.199
3 0.020 - 0.039 0.0050 - 0.0079 0.0050 - 0.0079 0.200 - 0.899
4 0.040 - 0.069 0.0080 - 0.0199 0.0080 - 0.0199 0.900 - 2.999
5 0.070 - 0.089 0.0200 - 0.0499 0.0200 - 0.0499 3.000 - 7.999
6 0.090 - 0.119 0.0500 - 0.0999 0.0500 - 0.0999 8.000 - 15.999
7 0.120 - 0.139 0.1000 - 0.1499 0.1000 - 0.2999 16.000 - 30.999
8 0.140 - 0.169 0.1500 - 0.2599 0.3000 - 0.4999 31.000 - 39.999
9 0.170 - 0.189 0.2600 - 0.7999 0.5000 - 0.7999 40.000 - 49.999
10 0.190 - 0.259 0.8000 - 1.000 0.8000 - 1.000 50.000 - 60.000
2.3.3 Ozone Monitor Audits
Ozone audit test gas was generated with the ozone generator in the mobile laboratory’s dilution
system. The audit gas was delivered to the station analyzer through the station inlet tubing using
a Teflon “tee” to allow the audit gas to vent at the inlet. The audit gas concentration was
measured with the level-2 standard photometer in the mobile lab and recorded by the mobile lab
DAS. One minute averages were reported by the site operator from the station monitor and
compared to the averages for the same time period from the standard.
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 2-8 EEMS
2.3.4 Specific NO2 CO and SO2 Audit Activities
Prior to beginning the NOx, CO, and SO2 audits, the EEMS audit CO analyzer was calibrated
using the NIST ultra-pure air and CO gases. This was accomplished by supplying the EEMS
mobile laboratory CO analyzer with NIST gas directly from the cylinders and not through the
mobile lab dilution system. Data from this “Pre-audit” calibration was entered into the
OAQPS audit spreadsheet to be used to calculate the concentration of all audit gases
generated during the station audits.
The site audits were accomplished by generating audit test gas using the mobile laboratory
dilution system and the NIST multi-blend gas. The audit gas was delivered to the station
analyzers at the station sample inlet, through all filters and fittings using Teflon tubing and a
Teflon bag to allow the audit gas to vent at the inlet. The generated audit gas CO concentrations
were verified with the mobile laboratory CO analyzer. The other audit gas concentrations
were then calculated based on the ratio of CO to the other gases in the NIST multi-blend
audit gas cylinder.
Immediately following the station audits, the mobile laboratory CO analyzer was again
challenged directly with the NIST cylinder gases. The results of this “Post-audit” challenge
were entered into the OAQPS spreadsheet to correct the audit standard gas concentrations,
accounting for any drift of the mobile laboratory CO analyzer. This procedure (Pre-audit CO
calibration, multipoint station audits, and Post-audit CO challenge) is the same OAQPS
standard procedure used routinely for all NPAP TTP audits.
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 3-1 EEMS
3.0 Audit Results
3.1 PM Audit Results
All operational and reporting PM 2.5 samplers were audited with the EEMS DeltaCal standard.
The samplers’ date and time and all operational variables were found to be within acceptable
limits. The Hillwood sampler results are summarized in Table 4 and the results of the three
samplers at Lockeland are included in Table 5.
Table 4 Hillwood PM Sampler Verification
Delta Cal Version 3.37P Site Hillwood
TEI Partisol 2025i
(#036) PM2.5
Firmware Version s/n = 0746-074745
DeltaCal S/N 1196 EEMS # 01451 DeltaCal Cert
Date: 1/25/2016
Date & Site of Verification 10/24/2016 Hillwood Partisol 2025i PM-2.5
Parameter DeltaCal 2025 Site Sampler Difference Acceptance
Criteria Pass/Fail
Flow Rate (Lpm) 16.60 16.67 0.42% ≤ ± 4% Pass
Design Flow Rate (16.67 Lpm) 16.60 -0.42% ≤ ± 4% Pass
Ambient Temperature (oC) 17.7 18.9 1.2 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg) 751.5 753 1.5
≤ ± 10 mm Hg
Pass
Filter Temperature (oC) 17.8 18.0 0.2 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass
Leak Check start = NA flow = N/A ≤ 5cm H2O N/A
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 3-2 EEMS
Table 5 Lockeland PM Samplers Verifications
Delta Cal Version 3.37P Site Lockeland
TEI Partisol 2025i
POC 1 (#023) s/n 202512-02161204
Firmware Version TEI Partisol 2025i
POC 2 (#223) s/n 202512-02241204
DeltaCal S/N 1196 EEMS # 01451 DeltaCal Cert Date: 1/25/2016
Date & Site of Verification 10/24/2016 Lockeland Partisol PM-2.5
Parameter DeltaCal POC 1 Sampler Difference Acceptance
Criteria Pass/Fail
Flow Rate (Lpm) 16.95 16.67 -1.65% ≤ ± 4% Pass
Design Flow Rate (16.67 Lpm)
16.95 1.68% ≤ ± 4% Pass
Ambient Temperature (oC)
20.3 19.7 -0.6 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)
753.5 752 -1.5 ≤ ± 10 mm
Hg Pass
Filter Temperature (oC) 20.9 20.1 -0.8 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass
Date & Site of Verification 10/24/2016 Lockeland Partisol colocated PM-2.5
Parameter DeltaCal POC 2 Sampler Difference Acceptance
Criteria Pass/Fail
Flow Rate (Lpm) 16.66 16.67 0.06% ≤ ± 4% Pass
Design Flow Rate (16.67 Lpm)
16.66 -0.06% ≤ ± 4% Pass
Ambient Temperature (oC)
19.5 19.3 -0.2 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)
753.5 754 0.5 ≤ ± 10 mm
Hg Pass
Filter Temperature (oC) 19.7 18.0 -1.7 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass
TEOM 1405 PM2.5
Firmware Version S/N = 1450A-134931502
Date and PEP Sampler 10/24/2016 Lockeland TEOM PM-2.5
Parameter DeltaCal PQ200 Audit
Sampler Difference
Acceptance Criteria
Pass/Fail
Flow Rate (Lpm) 16.87 16.67 -1.19% ≤ ± 4% Pass
Design Flow Rate (16.67 Lpm)
16.87 1.20% ≤ ± 4% Pass
Ambient Temperature (oC)
19.7 18.37 -1.33 ≤ ± 2 oC Pass
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)
753.5 751 -2.5 ≤ ± 10 mm
Hg Pass
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 3-3 EEMS
3.2 NPAP-TTP Ozone Audit Results
The audit results of the two ozone monitors in the network were within the acceptance limits of
±10% of any single audit point and within the warning level of ± 7%. The low level (level 2) test
points checked were within the warning limit of ± 0.001ppm. Although within acceptable limits,
the response of the ozone monitor at the East Health Center site to “ozone-free” test gas was
slightly low at -1ppb. This was likely a contributing factor to the overall low response of the
monitor to audit test gas. There were no observed problems with the accuracy of the station
monitors. The results of the O3 audits are summarized in Table 6. The field audit forms are
included in Appendix A.
Table 6 Ozone TTP Audit Results
Site and Audit Level Audit Value
(ppm) Site Value
(ppm) %
Difference
Absolute Difference
(ppm)
Pass Warning Fail
Percy Priest – level 6 0.10135 0.0974 -3.9 % -0.0040 Pass
Percy Priest – level 5 0.07378 0.0724 -1.9 % -0.0014 Pass
Percy Priest – level 4 0.04747 0.0467 -1.6 % -0.0008 Pass
Percy Priest – level 3 0.02772 0.0272 -1.9 % --0.0005 Pass
Percy Priest – level 2 0.01666 0.0165 N/A -0.0002 Pass
East – level 5 0.07201 0.07143 -0.8 % -0.0006 Pass
East – level 4 0.04731 0.04683 -1.0 % -0.0005 Pass
East – level 2 0.01435 0.01378 N/A -0.0006 Pass
3.3 NPAP-TTP Sulfur Dioxide Audit Results
The single SO2 monitor in the network is operated at the East Health Center site. The audit
results were within the acceptance limits of ±15% of any single audit point and within the
warning limit of ±10%. The low level (level 2) test point was within the warning limit of
±0.001ppm. There were no observed problems with the accuracy of the station monitors. The
result of the SO2 audit is summarized in Table 7. The field audit forms are included in Appendix
A.
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 3-4 EEMS
Table 7 Sulfur Dioxide TTP Audit Results
Site and Audit Level Audit Value
(ppm) Site Value
(ppm) %
Difference
Absolute Difference
(ppm)
Pass Warning Fail
East – level 7 0.1484 0.1471 -0.9 % -0.0013 Pass
East – level 6 0.0743 0.0732 -1.5 % -0.0011 Pass
East – level 5 0.0371 0.0354 -4.5 % -0.0017 Pass
East – level 4 0.0195 0.0183 -6.2 % -0.0012 Pass
East – level 2 0.0041 0.0032 N/A -0,0009 Pass
3.4 NPAP-TTP Carbon Monoxide Audit Results
There is one CO monitor in the network at the Near Road site. The audit result of that monitor
was within the acceptance limits of ± 15% of any single audit point. The lowest concentration
level tested was above the warning limits of ± 10%. The monitor response to “zero air” was
slightly high at 0.080 ppm. The zero response likely contributed to the error at the low audit test
points. There were no observed problems with the accuracy of the station monitor. The results of
the CO audit are summarized in Table 8. The field audit forms are included in Appendix A.
Table 8 Carbon Monoxide TTP Audit Results
Site and Audit Level Audit Value
(ppm) Site Value
(ppm) %
Difference
Absolute Difference
(ppm)
Pass Warning Fail
Near Road – level 6 14.785 15.150 2.5 % 0.3650 Pass
Near Road – level 5 7.366 7.650 3.9 % 0.2840 Pass
Near Road – level 5 3.675 3.865 5.2 % 0.1900 Pass
Near Road – level 4 1.442 1.581 9.6 % 0.1390 Pass
Near Road – level 3 0.742 0.848 14.2 % 0.1055 Warning
3.5 NPAP-TTP Nitrogen Dioxide Audit Results
All of the NO2 audit results for all sites were within the acceptance limits of ± 15% of any single
audit point, and within the warning limits of ±10%. All zero concentration levels were also
found within acceptable limits. There were no observed problems with the accuracy of the station
monitors. The results of the NO2 audits are summarized in Table 9. The field audit forms are
included in Appendix A.
MPHD Monitoring Network Audit November2016
EE-MS.com/transfer/clients/MPHD 3-5 EEMS
Table 9 Nitrogen Dioxide TTP Audit Results
Site and Audit Level Audit Value
(ppm) Site Value
(ppm) %
Difference
Absolute Difference
(ppm)
Pass Warning Fail
East – level 7 0.1050 0.0991 -5.6 % -0.0059 Pass
East – level 5 0.0440 0.0409 -7.1 % -0.0031 Pass
East – level 4 0.0184 0.0169 -8.3 % -0.0015 Pass
East – level 2 0.0036 0.0027 N/A -0.0009 Pass
East Converter Efficiency – level 7 100.2 % Pass
East Converter Efficiency – level 5 100.1 % Pass
East Converter Efficiency – level 4 99.3 % Pass
East Converter Efficiency – level 2 97.5 % Pass
Near Road – level 7 0.1002 0.0981 -2.1 % -0.0021 Pass
Near Road – level 5 0.0428 0.0424 -0.9 % -0.0004 Pass
Near Road – level 4 0.0161 0.0164 1.6 % 0.0003 Pass
Near Road – level 2 0.0036 0.0040 N/A 0.0004 Pass
Near Road Converter Efficiency – level 7 97.8 % Pass
Near Road Converter Efficiency – level 5 97.6 % Pass
Near Road Converter Efficiency – level 4 98.8 % Pass
Near Road Converter Efficiency – level 2 97.2 % Pass
3.6 Recommendations
The stations in the MPHD monitoring network are in good condition and very well run. Site
operators are knowledgeable and maintain the site monitors in very good working order.
Operation of the gaseous pollutant monitors would be improved by automation of the routine
zero/precision and span functions. Routine automation of the baseline (zero drift) correction of
the trace-level carbon monoxide monitor at the Near Road site would improve the operation of
that monitor.
EEMS is working on an estimate of costs and time to complete the recommended improvements
to the monitoring network operation.
APPENDIX A
Audit Data Sheets
Site Name: Percy Priest Dam Airs ID: 0Auditor: Eric Hebert (EEMS) Audit Date: 10/24/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)
Instrument: Ozone COManufacturer: Thermo 0Model: 49C-PS 0Serial Number: 0517112167 0Calibration Date: 09/14/16 1/0/1900Slope: 1.00261 0Intercept (PPM): -0.00015202 0
STATION INSTRUMENT INFORMATIONInstrument:Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 49i-A2NABProperty Number:Calibration Date:Slope/Intercept (PPB): 0.0000 0.0000Indicated Flow (LPM):In-Line Filter Change:Manifold Type:
Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric Hebert (EEMS)
O3 Audit Level 6 Pass PrintO3 Audit Level 5 Pass O3 Audit Level 4 Pass SignatureO3 Audit Level 3 Pass O3 Audit Level 2 Pass
EPA person notified in case of audit failure
Audit LimitsPass Bias < ±10% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable drift (0.003 ppm) Fail Bias > ±10% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable drift (0.003 ppm)
Warning Bias > ±7% AND difference from actual concentration > 0.0015 ppm
Comments:
0.10135 0.09740 -3.9
Ozone
OZONE REPORT
NPAP O3 Concentration (ppm)
PRELIMINARY OZONE AUDIT RESULTS
Site Response (ppm)
Percent Difference
FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORT
MOBILE PE LAB INSTRUMENTS
10/14/161/4" Teflon
0.69 / 0.69
132245865201/00/00
EEMS Van-1
0
0.02772 0.02720 -1.9
0.07378 0.07240 -1.9
0.04747 0.04670 -1.6
0.00028 0.00140
0.01666 0.01650 -1.0
Site Name: Percy Priest Dam Audit Date: 10/24/2016
-0.0040 Pass -0.0014 Pass -0.0008 Pass -0.0005 Pass -0.0002 Pass
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
* = CFR Appendix A Audit Levels
SO2 Audit Point #1SO2 Audit Point #2
NO2 Audit Point #4
Warning
CO Audit Point #2CO Audit Point #3
Carbon Monoxide
0.073780.047470.02772
0.0724O3 Audit Level 6
0.0467
Pass/Fail
0.10135
-1.6
0.016660.0272
0.0974
CO Audit Point #1
NOx Audit Point #1NOx Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #4
NO Audit Point #1NO Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #3
NO2 Audit Point #1
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1
Ozone
ParameterNPAP Lab Response
(ppm)Station Response
(ppm)
-3.9
0.0165
-1.9
-1.9
O3 Audit Level 5O3 Audit Level 4
O3 Audit Level 2
Oxides of Nitrogen
Percent Difference
-1.0O3 Audit Level 3
Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #4
NO2 Audit Point #2
SO2 Audit Point #3
NO2 Audit Point #3
Sulfur Dioxide
Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #1Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #2Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #3
CO Audit Point #4CO Audit Point #5
SO2 Audit Point #4SO2 Audit Point #5
Absolute Difference
(ppm)
NO Audit Point #5
NOx Audit Point #5
NO Audit Point #3NO Audit Point #4
Site Name: East Health Center Airs ID: 0Auditor: Eric Hebert (EEMS) Audit Date: 10/25/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)
Instrument: Ozone COManufacturer: Thermo 0Model: 49C-PS 0Serial Number: 0517112167 0Calibration Date: 09/14/16 1/0/1900Slope: 1.00261 0Intercept (PPM): -0.00015202 0
STATION INSTRUMENT INFORMATIONInstrument:Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 49i-A3NCAProperty Number:Calibration Date:Slope/Intercept (PPB): 0.0000 0.0000Indicated Flow (LPM):In-Line Filter Change:Manifold Type:
Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric Hebert (EEMS)
O3 Audit Level 6 N/A PrintO3 Audit Level 5 Pass O3 Audit Level 4 Pass SignatureO3 Audit Level 2 Pass O3 Audit Level 1 N/A
EPA person notified in case of audit failure
Audit LimitsPass Bias < ±10% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable drift (0.003 ppm) Fail Bias > ±10% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable drift (0.003 ppm)
Warning Bias > ±7% AND difference from actual concentration > 0.0015 ppm
Comments:The station monitor response to ozone-free air (0 ppm) was somewhat low (-1 ppb) which contributed to the overall error at low concentration audit levels.
0.01435 0.01378 -4.0
0.07201 0.07143 -0.8
0.04731 0.04683 -1.0
0.00033 -0.00106
FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORT
MOBILE PE LAB INSTRUMENTS
10/24/161/4" Teflon
0.70 / 0.70
CM0913003701/00/00
EEMS Van-1
Ozone
OZONE REPORT
NPAP O3 Concentration (ppm)
PRELIMINARY OZONE AUDIT RESULTS
Site Response (ppm)
Percent Difference
Site Name: East Health Center Audit Date: 10/25/2016
N/A-0.0006 Pass -0.0005 Pass -0.0006 Pass
N/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
* = CFR Appendix A Audit Levels
Absolute Difference
(ppm)
NO Audit Point #5
NOx Audit Point #5
NO Audit Point #3NO Audit Point #4
CO Audit Point #4CO Audit Point #5
SO2 Audit Point #4SO2 Audit Point #5
Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #4
NO2 Audit Point #2
SO2 Audit Point #3
NO2 Audit Point #3
Sulfur Dioxide
Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #1Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #2Converter Efficiency NO2 Audit Point #3
Oxides of Nitrogen
Percent Difference
O3 Audit Level 2
NOx Audit Point #1NOx Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #4
NO Audit Point #1NO Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #3
NO2 Audit Point #1
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1
Ozone
ParameterNPAP Lab Response
(ppm)Station Response
(ppm)
-0.8
-4.0
O3 Audit Level 5O3 Audit Level 4
O3 Audit Level 1
SO2 Audit Point #1SO2 Audit Point #2
NO2 Audit Point #4
Warning
CO Audit Point #2CO Audit Point #3
Carbon Monoxide
0.072010.047310.01435
0.07143O3 Audit Level 6
0.04683
Pass/Fail
-1.00.01378
CO Audit Point #1
Site Name: East Airs ID: Auditor: Eric Hebert Audit Date: 10/25/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)
Instrument: Ozone CO Instrument:Manufacturer: Thermo TEI Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 42i-ANMSPAAModel: 49C-PS 48i TLE Property Number:Serial Number: 0517112167 1503464200 Calibration Date:Calibration Date: 09/14/16 Calibrated Slope/Intercept: 0.000 0.000Slope 1.00261 on Indicated Flow:Intercept -0.00015202 day of audit In-Line Filter Change:
Manifold Type:
Pass/Fail Warning WarningPassPassPassPassN/A
Audit Limits
Pass Bias < ±15% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable Fail Bias > ±15% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable
Warning Bias > ±10% AND difference from actual concentration > 0.0015 ppm
Converter Efficiency Audit LimitsPass Between 96% and 104%Fail <96% or >104%
Warning Between 96%-97% or 103%-104%
Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric HebertPass PrintPassPass SignaturePassPassPassPass EPA person notified in case of audit failurePass
Comments:0
NOx Audit Point #1
0.0042
0.0380
-3.7
Pass
0.0002
0.1520
0.0780
-0.0001
0.1554
0.0761 2.4
0.1520
0.0761
0.0002
-3.3
0.0737 -3.1
2.3
FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1
MOBIL PE LAB INSTRUMENTSNO/NOX
PRELIMINARY NO AUDIT RESULTS PRELIMINARY NOx AUDIT RESULTS
1/4" Teflon
01/00/00
NITROGEN OXIDES REPORT
STATION INTRUMENT INFORMATION
1153030011
1.1 L/min10/24/2016
NPAP NO Concentration (ppm)
Percent Difference
Site Response (ppm)
NPAP NOX CONCENTRATION (ppm)
0.0200
0.0380
0.0000-0.0004 -0.0004
0.0387 -3.21.8
0.01930.0203 1.4
0.0368
SITE RESPONSE (ppm)
Percent Difference
-0.0001
0.1470
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0001
NPAP NO2 Concentration (ppm)
Site Response (ppm)
Percent Difference
N/A
Pass/Fail
0.0200
NO Audit Point #3
PRELIMINARY NO2 AUDIT RESULTS
NO Audit Point #2
NO Audit Point #4 NOx Audit Point #4 Pass
NO Audit Point #1
NO Audit Point #5
Converter Efficiency
0.0042
PassPassNOx Audit Point #3
NOx Audit Point #2
0.1050
0.0036
0.0000
100.2%
0.0409 -7.1
0.0184 0.0169 -8.3 99.3%
0.0440
-25.8 97.5%
0.0991 -5.6
-0.0085
100.1%
0.0036 0.0027 -25.8 97.5%
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 5
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 7
0.0027
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 2
NO2 Audit level 5NO2 Audit level 4
NO2 Audit level 7
NO2 Audit level 2
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 4
Site Name: East Airs ID: Auditor: Eric Hebert Audit Date: 10/25/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)
Instrument: Ozone COManufacturer: Thermo TEIModel: 49C-PS 48i TLESerial Number: 0517112167 1503464200Calibration Date: 09/14/16 CalibratedSlope 1.00261 on Intercept -0.00015202 day of audit
STATION INSTRUMENT INFORMATIONInstrument:Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 43i-AZSABProperty Number:Calibration Date:Slope/Intercept: 0.000 0.000Indicated Flow:In-Line Filter Change:Manifold Type:
Pass/Fail WarningSO2 Audit level 7 Pass Auditor Eric HebertSO2 Audit level 6 Pass Print
SO2 Audit level 5 PassSO2 Audit level 4 Pass Signature
SO2 Audit level 2 PassEPA person notified in case of audit failure
Audit LimitsPass Bias < ±15% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable drift (0.003 ppm) Fail Bias > ±15% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable drift (0.003 ppm)
Warning Bias > ±10% AND difference from actual concentration > 0.0015 ppm
Comments:
1303156453
FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1
MOBIL PE LAB INSTRUMENTS
SULFUR DIOXIDE REPORT
0.0183 -6.2
-21.2
SO2
0.6 L/min
0.1471
01/00/00
10/24/20161/4" Teflon
PRELIMINARY SULFUR DIOXIDE AUDIT RESULTS
0.0002
0.0743
0.0371
0.0732
0.0354
-1.5
-4.5
0
NPAP SO2 Concentration (ppm)
0.0032
0.1484
0.0001
-0.9
-0.0004 -0.0003
Percent DifferenceSite Response
(ppm)
0.0195
0.0041
Site Name: East Audit Date: 10/25/2016
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
-0.0003 Pass0.0034 Pass 0.0019 Pass 0.0007 Pass 0.0003 Pass
N/A0.0004 Pass
-0.0003 Pass-0.0050 Pass -0.0024 Pass -0.0012 Pass -0.0007 Pass
N/A0.0005 Pass
0.0000-0.0059 Pass -0.0031 Pass -0.0015 Pass -0.0009 Pass0.0001
100.2% Pass100.1% Pass99.3% Pass97.5% Pass
-0.0001 Pass-0.0013 Pass -0.0011 Pass -0.0017 Pass-0.0012 Pass-0.0009 Pass0.0001 Pass
Warning
CO Audit level 4CO Audit level 3
Carbon Monoxide
Ozone Audit Point #1
Pass/Fail
3.669
CO Audit level 5
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASEDEEMS Van-1
Ozone
ParameterNPAP Lab Response
(ppm)Station Response
(ppm)
Ozone Audit Point #2Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #5Ozone Audit Point #4
Pre Zero
Percent Difference
Absolute Difference
(ppm)
NO Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #3 0.03680.0193
0.0002
NO Audit Point #5
CO Audit level 3CO Audit level 2
1.930
2.3
Oxides of Nitrogen
-0.043
0.01914.6847.352
0.410
NO Audit Point #1
SO2 Audit level 20.01950.0041
0.01830.0032
-4.5
0.0001
0.0371
0.14710.07320.0354
0.00020.14840.0743
-0.9-1.5
SO2 Audit level 5
Sulfur Dioxide
SO2 Audit level 7SO2 Audit level 6
SO2 Audit level 4
-8.3
0.1050 0.09910.04090.0169
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 2
NO2 Audit level 5NO2 Audit level 4
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 7Converter Efficiency NO2 level 5Converter Efficiency NO2 level 4
-6.2
Pre Zero
NO2 Audit level 2
NO2 Audit level 70.0000
0.04400.0184
0.0387
0.0002 -0.0001
0.0036 0.0027
2.4
0.07610.03800.0200
0.15200.0761
0.15540.0780
0.1520
0.0200
-21.2
-3.3
0.0203
-3.1-3.2
-5.6-7.1
-3.7
-0.00010.14700.0737
0.0000
1.4
0.0001
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0042
0.0042
NO Audit Point #3NO Audit Point #4
0.0380 1.8
NOx Audit Point #1NOx Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #4
-0.0004 -0.0003
Post Zero -0.0004 0.0000
Post Zero -0.0004 0.0001
Post Zero
Pre Zero
Post Zero
Pre Zero
Pre Zero
Pre Zero
Post Zero
-25.8Post Zero 0.0000
Site Name: Near Road Airs ID: Auditor: Eric Hebert Audit Date: 10/26/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)
Instrument: Ozone CO Instrument:Manufacturer: Thermo TEI Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 42i-TLModel: 49C-PS 48i TLE Property Number:Serial Number: 0517112167 1503464200 Calibration Date:Calibration Date: 09/14/16 Calibrated Slope/Intercept: 0.000 0.000Slope 1.00261 on Indicated Flow:Intercept -0.00015202 day of audit In-Line Filter Change:
Manifold Type:
Pass/Fail Warning WarningPassPassPassPassN/A
Audit Limits
Pass Bias < ±15% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable dFail Bias > ±15% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable
Warning Bias > ±10% AND difference from actual concentration > 0.0015 ppm
Converter Efficiency Audit LimitsPass Between 96% and 104%Fail <96% or >104%
Warning Between 96%-97% or 103%-104%
Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric HebertPass PrintPassPass SignaturePassPassPassPass EPA person notified in case of audit failurePass
Comments:0
0.0036 0.0040 9.7 97.2%
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 5
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 7
0.0040
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 2
NO2 Audit level 5NO2 Audit level 4
NO2 Audit level 7
NO2 Audit level 2
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 4
0.1002
0.0036
0.0000
97.8%
0.0424 -0.9
0.0161 0.0164 1.6 98.8%
0.0428
9.7 97.2%
0.0981 -2.1
-0.0020
97.6%
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0007
NPAP NO2 Concentration (ppm)
Site Response (ppm)
Percent Difference
N/A
Pass/Fail
0.0149
NO Audit Point #3
PRELIMINARY NO2 AUDIT RESULTS
NO Audit Point #2
NO Audit Point #4 NOx Audit Point #4 Pass
NO Audit Point #1
NO Audit Point #5
Converter Efficiency
0.0077
PassPassNOx Audit Point #3
NOx Audit Point #2
NPAP NO Concentration (ppm)
Percent Difference
Site Response (ppm)
NPAP NOX CONCENTRATION (ppm)
0.0149
0.0380
0.0000-0.0004 -0.0004
0.0383 1.10.7
0.01560.0152 2.0
0.0384
SITE RESPONSE (ppm)
Percent Difference
0.0000
0.1545
FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1
MOBIL PE LAB INSTRUMENTSNO/NOX
PRELIMINARY NO AUDIT RESULTS PRELIMINARY NOx AUDIT RESULTS
1/4" Teflon
01/00/00
NITROGEN OXIDES REPORT
STATION INTRUMENT INFORMATION
1324658812
010/21/2016
NOx Audit Point #1
0.0077
0.0380
4.4
Pass
0.0001
0.1530
0.0770
0.0000
0.1565
0.0762 1.0
0.1530
0.0762
0.0001
1.0
0.0768 0.7
2.3
Site Name: Near Road Airs ID: Auditor: Eric Hebert Audit Date: 10/26/16Station Manager: Erin Jackson (MPHD) / Scott (operator)
Instrument: Ozone COManufacturer: Thermo TEIModel: 49C-PS 48i TLESerial Number: 0517112167 1503464200Calibration Date: 09/14/16 CalibratedSlope 1.00261 on Intercept -0.00015202 day of audit
STATION INSTRUMENT INFORMATIONInstrument:Manufacturer/Model #: Thermo 48i-TLEProperty Number:Calibration Date:Slope/Intercept: 0.00 0.00Indicated Flow:In-Line Filter Change:Manifold Type:
Pass/Fail Warning Auditor Eric HebertCO Audit level 6 Pass PrintCO Audit level 5 Pass CO Audit level 5 Pass SignatureCO Audit level 4 Pass CO Audit level 3 Pass Warning
EPA person notified in case of audit failureAudit Limits
Pass Bias < ±15% OR difference from actual concentration < 24 hour allowable drift (0.4 ppm) Fail Bias > ±15% AND difference from actual concentration > 24 hour allowable drift (0.4 ppm)
Warning Bias > ±10% AND difference from actual concentration > 0.030 ppm
Comments:
3.9
5.2
0
-0.039 0.080
0.742 0.848 14.2
1.442 9.6
7.650
1.581
7.366
3.675
NPAP CO Concentration (ppm)
Site Response (ppm)
Percent Difference
2.5
0.0810.013
14.785 15.150
FINAL NPAP THROUGH-THE-PROBE AUDIT REPORTEEMS Van-1
MOBIL PE LAB INSTRUMENTS
0
CO
CARBON MONOXIDE REPORT
132465881501/00/00
010/21/2016
PRELIMINARY CARBON MONOXIDE AUDIT RESULTS
3.865
Site Name: Near Road Audit Date: 10/26/2016
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
0.0680 Pass0.3650 Pass 0.2840 Pass 0.1900 Pass 0.1390 Pass 0.1055 Pass Warning0.1190 Pass
-0.0001 Pass0.0035 Pass 0.0008 Pass 0.0003 Pass 0.0003 Pass
N/A0.0004 Pass
-0.0001 Pass0.0015 Pass 0.0005 Pass 0.0004 Pass 0.0007 Pass
N/A0.0011 Pass
0.0006-0.0021 Pass -0.0004 Pass 0.0003 Pass 0.0004 Pass0.0008
97.8% Pass97.6% Pass98.8% Pass97.2% Pass
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
-0.0004
Post Zero -0.0004 0.0000
Post Zero -0.0004 0.0007
Post Zero
Pre Zero
Post Zero
Pre Zero
Pre Zero
Pre Zero
Post Zero
9.7Post Zero 0.0000
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0077
0.0077
NO Audit Point #3NO Audit Point #4
0.0380 0.7
NOx Audit Point #1NOx Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #4
1.0
0.0152
0.71.1
-2.1-0.9
4.4
0.00000.15450.0768
0.0006
2.0
0.0008
0.0000
0.04280.0161
0.0383
0.0001 0.0000
0.0036 0.0040
1.0
0.07620.03800.0149
0.15300.0762
0.15650.0770
0.1530
0.0149
SO2 Audit level 4
1.6
0.1002 0.09810.04240.0164
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 2
NO2 Audit level 5NO2 Audit level 4
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 7Converter Efficiency NO2 level 5Converter Efficiency NO2 level 4
Pre Zero
NO2 Audit level 2
NO2 Audit level 7
SO2 Audit level 30.01460.0075
0.0371
0.00010.14940.0745
SO2 Audit level 5
Sulfur Dioxide
SO2 Audit level 7SO2 Audit level 6
9.614.2
2.3
Oxides of Nitrogen
-0.039
0.01314.7857.366
5.23.865
0.7421.5810.8480.080
0.081
NO Audit Point #1NO Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #3 0.03840.0156
0.0001
NO Audit Point #5
CO Audit level 4CO Audit level 3
1.442
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASEDEEMS Van-1
Ozone
ParameterNPAP Lab Response
(ppm)Station Response
(ppm)
Ozone Audit Point #2Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #5Ozone Audit Point #4
Pre Zero
Percent Difference
Absolute Difference
(ppm)Warning
CO Audit level 5CO Audit level 5
Carbon Monoxide
Ozone Audit Point #1
Pass/Fail
3.675
15.150CO Audit level 6 2.57.650 3.9
APPENDIX B
Maps of Locations
feetmeters
1000400
feetmeters
1000400
feetmeters
1000500
feetmeters
1000400
feetmeters
3000900
APPENDIX C
Audit Standards Certifications
Site Name: EPA R-7 Audit Date: 9/15/2016
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
-0.0005 Pass0.0190 Pass 0.0310 Pass 0.0280 Pass 0.0170 Pass 0.0170 Pass 0.0340 Pass
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/A
-0.0001 Pass-0.0022 Pass -0.0010 Pass -0.0016 Pass Warning-0.0011 Pass-0.0005 Pass0.0000 Pass-0.0001 -0.0001
Post Zero -0.0002
Post Zero -0.0002
Post Zero
Pre Zero
Post Zero
Pre Zero
Pre Zero
Pre Zero
Post Zero
Post Zero 0.0000
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0017
0.0017
NO Audit Point #3NO Audit Point #4
0.0067
NOx Audit Point #1NOx Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #4
-31.3
0.0000
0.0001
0.01760.00670.0044
0.04470.0176
0.0447
0.0044
SO2 Audit level 2
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 1
NO2 Audit level 3NO2 Audit level 2
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 4Converter Efficiency NO2 level 3Converter Efficiency NO2 level 2
-25.6
Pre Zero
NO2 Audit level 1
NO2 Audit level 4
SO2 Audit level 10.00430.0016
0.00320.0011
-24.2
0.0000
0.0066
0.04150.01620.0050
0.00010.04370.0172
-5.0-5.8
SO2 Audit level 3
Sulfur Dioxide
SO2 Audit level 5SO2 Audit level 4
4.010.4
Oxides of Nitrogen
-0.015
0.0054.3241.703
4.30.676
0.1630.4450.1800.019
0.0045
NO Audit Point #1NO Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #3
0.0001
NO Audit Point #5
CO Audit level 3CO Audit level 2
0.428
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASEDEEMS Van-1
Ozone
ParameterNPAP Lab Response
(ppm)Station Response
(ppm)
Ozone Audit Point #2Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #5Ozone Audit Point #4
Pre Zero
Percent Difference
Absolute Difference
(ppm)Warning
CO Audit level 4CO Audit level 3
Carbon Monoxide
Ozone Audit Point #1
Pass/Fail
0.648
4.343CO Audit level 5 0.41.734 1.8
Site Name: EPA R-7 Audit Date: 9/14/2016
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
-0.0001 Pass0.0012 Pass 0.0001 Pass 0.0003 Pass 0.0005 Pass 0.0007 Pass0.0007 Pass
-0.0001 Pass0.0012 Pass 0.0001 Pass 0.0004 Pass 0.0006 Pass 0.0007 Pass0.0008 Pass
0.0001-0.0003 Pass 0.0002 Pass 0.0001 Pass 0.0006 Pass0.0000
98.2% Pass101.3% Pass100.0% Pass100.0% Pass
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Warning
CO Audit level 4CO Audit level 3
Carbon Monoxide
Ozone Audit Point #1
Pass/Fail
0.719
CO Audit level 5
FINAL SUMMARY AUDIT REPORT CO BASEDEEMS Van-1
Ozone
ParameterNPAP Lab Response
(ppm)Station Response
(ppm)
Ozone Audit Point #2Ozone Audit Point #3
Ozone Audit Point #5Ozone Audit Point #4
Pre Zero
Percent Difference
Absolute Difference
(ppm)
NO Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #3 0.00780.0056
0.0001
NO Audit Point #5
CO Audit level 3CO Audit level 2
0.482
2.7
Oxides of Nitrogen
-0.072
0.0114.3391.725
0.192
NO Audit Point #1
SO2 Audit level 10.00490.0019
0.0073
0.00010.04390.0174
SO2 Audit level 3
Sulfur Dioxide
SO2 Audit level 5SO2 Audit level 4
SO2 Audit level 2
3.3
0.0110 0.01070.00720.0031
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 1
NO2 Audit level 3NO2 Audit level 2
Converter Efficiency NO2 level 4Converter Efficiency NO2 level 3Converter Efficiency NO2 level 2
Pre Zero
NO2 Audit level 1
NO2 Audit level 40.0000
0.00700.0030
0.0077
0.0001 0.0000
0.0010 0.0016
0.6
0.01780.00740.0050
0.04490.0178
0.04610.0179
0.0449
0.0050
2.7
0.0055
0.65.4
-2.72.9
12.0
0.00000.04610.0179
0.0001
10.0
0.0000
NOx Audit Point #5
0.0020 0.0027 35.0
0.0020 0.0027 35.0
NO Audit Point #3NO Audit Point #4
0.0074 4.1
NOx Audit Point #1NOx Audit Point #2
NOx Audit Point #4
-0.0007
Post Zero -0.0007 0.0000
Post Zero -0.0007 0.0001
Post Zero
Pre Zero
Post Zero
Pre Zero
Pre Zero
Pre Zero
Post Zero
60.0Post Zero 0.0000
Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in Enter new slope and intercept in yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells yellow highlighted cells
Date 1/20/2016 Date 1/21/2016 Date 1/22/2016 Date 1/23/2016 Date 1/28/2016 Date 9/14/2016
m1 1/20/2016 0.999929 m1 1/21/2016 0.996503 m1 1/22/2016 0.998195 m1 1/23/2016 0.999917 m1 1/28/2016 1.00770 m1 9/14/2016 1.01342
m2 1/19/2016 1.00076 m2 1/20/2016 0.99993 m2 1/21/2016 0.99650 m2 1/22/2016 0.99820 m2 1/23/2016 0.99992 m2 1/28/2016 1.00770
m3 1/18/2016 0.99819 m3 1/19/2016 1.00076 m3 1/20/2016 0.99993 m3 1/21/2016 0.99650 m3 1/22/2016 0.99820 m3 1/23/2016 0.99992
m4 9/21/2015 1.02307 m4 1/18/2016 0.99819 m4 1/19/2016 1.00076 m4 1/20/2016 0.99993 m4 1/21/2016 0.99650 m4 1/22/2016 0.99820
m5 4/29/2015 1.02260 m5 9/21/2015 1.02307 m5 1/18/2016 0.99819 m5 1/19/2016 1.00076 m5 1/20/2016 0.99993 m5 1/21/2016 0.99650
m6 1/7/2015 1.02050 m6 4/29/2015 1.02260 m6 9/21/2015 1.02307 m6 1/18/2016 0.99819 m6 1/19/2016 1.00076 m6 1/20/2016 0.99993
I1 1/20/2016 -0.418899 I1 1/21/2016 -0.323250 I1 1/22/2016 -0.384025 I1 1/23/2016 -0.335463 I1 1/28/2016 0.22470 I1 9/14/2016 0.32479
I2 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I2 1/20/2016 -0.41890 I2 1/21/2016 -0.32325 I2 1/22/2016 -0.38403 I2 1/23/2016 -0.33546 I2 1/28/2016 0.22470
I3 1/18/2016 -0.27641 I3 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I3 1/20/2016 -0.41890 I3 1/21/2016 -0.32325 I3 1/22/2016 -0.38403 I3 1/23/2016 -0.33546
I4 9/21/2015 -0.26399 I4 1/18/2016 -0.27641 I4 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I4 1/20/2016 -0.41890 I4 1/21/2016 -0.32325 I4 1/22/2016 -0.38403
I5 4/29/2015 -0.20400 I5 9/21/2015 -0.26399 I5 1/18/2016 -0.27641 I5 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I5 1/20/2016 -0.41890 I5 1/21/2016 -0.32325
I6 1/7/2015 -0.34620 I6 4/29/2015 -0.20400 I6 9/21/2015 -0.26399 I6 1/18/2016 -0.27641 I6 1/19/2016 -0.49351 I6 1/20/2016 -0.41890
Average m 1/20/2016 1.01084 Average m 1/21/2016 1.00684 Average m 1/22/2016 1.00278 Average m 1/23/2016 0.99892 Average m 1/28/2016 1.00050 Average m 9/14/2016 1.00261
Avarage I 1/20/2016 -0.33383 Avarage I 1/21/2016 -0.33001 Avarage I 1/22/2016 -0.36001 Avarage I 1/23/2016 -0.37193 Avarage I 1/28/2016 -0.28841 Avarage I 9/14/2016 -0.15202
s m (%) 1/20/2016 1.22 s m (%) 1/21/2016 1.24 s m (%) 1/22/2016 1.00 s m (%) 1/23/2016 0.16 s m (%) 1/28/2016 0.38 s m (%) 9/14/2016 0.65
s I (ppb) 1/20/2016 0.1 s I (ppb) 1/21/2016 0.1 s I (ppb) 1/22/2016 0.1 s I (ppb) 1/23/2016 0.1 s I (ppb) 1/28/2016 0.3 s I (ppb) 9/14/2016 0.3
Test s m 1/20/2016 PASS Test s m 1/21/2016 PASS Test s m 1/22/2016 PASS Test s m 1/23/2016 PASS Test s m 1/28/2016 PASS Test s m 9/14/2016 PASS
Test s I 1/20/2016 PASS Test s I 1/21/2016 PASS Test s I 1/22/2016 PASS Test s I 1/23/2016 PASS Test s I 1/28/2016 PASS Test s I 9/14/2016 PASS
EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 01113 EEMS # 011136-day calibration 6-day calibration 6-day calibration 6-day calibration Verification Verification
At EEMS 1/20/2016 At EEMS 1/21/2016 At EEMS 1/22/2016 At EEMS 1/23/2016 At EPA R4 1/28/2016 At EPA R7 9/14/2016offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2 offset = -0.2span = 1.015 span = 1.015 span = 1.015 span = 1.015 span = 1.015 span = 1.015
cell next to "Date". S/N = 0517112167S/N = 0517112167
Enter date in yellow highlightedEnter date in yellow highlightedcell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
Enter date in yellow highlightedcell next to "Date".
Enter date in yellow highlightedcell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
Enter date in yellow highlightedcell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
Enter date in yellow highlightedcell next to "Date".
S/N = 0517112167
51100
mSm
26
1
6
1
2
61
i iii mm
26
1
6
1
2
61
i iii II5
1
IS
51100
mSm
26
1
6
1
2
61
i iii mm
26
1
6
1
2
61
i iii II5
1
IS