2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
-
Upload
david-pitt -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
1/30
5 \
) >
SUPREMECOURT
OF
THE TATEOFNEW
YORK
EWYORKCOUNTY
PRESENT:
HON.PAULWQOTEN PART
Justice
JAMES OURI,
P l a l n t f f f ,
I N D E X NO. 107240/04
- a gainst
-
MOTION
8EQ.
O .
OOP
JOHN
SIEBERT
nd
JOHN
W IEBERT,
D. C. ,
Defendants.
The ol l o w i n g p a p e r s , numbered 1 to 4 , ere r e a d o n h i s motion by
the
l a i n t i f f to
v a c a t e a
p r i o r
O rder o f h i s Court ^
PAPERSNUMBERED
Notice
o f
Motion/ O rder to Show auseAffidavits xhibits
A n s w e r i n g
A f f i d a v i t s
x h i b i t s
E
P
Replying
A f f i d a v i t s
(Reply Memo _L
U V J A M 2 O t t
Cross-Motion:
Yes
LFNo
OOWnYOSSSf^
B e f o r e t h e
C o u r t
s a m o t i o f p b i ^ h e ^
Recommendation o f J u d i c i a l H e a r i n g
O f f i c e r
I r a Gammerman (JHO Gammermmi) a t e d
December 15,2014 and e n t e r e d
on F e b r u a r y
10,2015. A l s o b e f o r e
t h e
C o u r t I s a c r o s s -
m o t i o n
by h e
p l a i n t i f f , d a t e d A p r i l
6,2015,
o r e j e c t
t h e R e p o r t
o f JHO Gammerman
c l a i m i n g
P e r j u r y , F r a u d on h e C o u r t a n d f o r g i n g and p l a n t i n g o f F i l e s I n
M o t i o n Sequence
7
y
J o s e p h
B u r k e , o r an Order (1) e j e c t i n g
e n t i r e l y
t h e i l l e g a l and r a u d u l e n t I n q u e s t
O r d e r
g r o u n d e d
o n F r a u d , p e r j u r y a n d f r a u d u l e n t B u r k e 4 - 1 - 1 5 M o t i o n I n v i o l a t i o n o f B e e l e r i n j u n c t i o n
m a n d a t i n g
' p e r m i s s i o n ' and
i o l a t i o n s
o f mandates f I n q u e s t s s i c ] ,
c o n d u c t e d
by
d e f a u l t
due
t o
m y l l n e s s . (2)
a c a t i n g
t h e
D e c i s i o n
o f
1 2 - 2 4 - 1 3 ,
on h e a d d i t i o n a l
g r o u n d s
o f
r a u d
on h e
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
2/30
C r o s s - M o t i o n ) .
The defendant
i l e d e p l y
a f f i d a v i t
on p r i l
8,2015.
BACKGROUND
By an r d e r d a t e d December 4,2013 nd i l e d on December 6,2013, i s C o u r t .
d i r e c t e d t h e d e f e n d a n t s
t o
i l e t h e Note
f I s s u e
on
r
b e f o r e J a n u a r y
28,2014,
nd
upon
h a t
f i l i n g t h e C o u r t s t a t e d
t h a t
t h e C l e r k s h a l l s e t a a t e upon h i c h an n q u e s t i l l be e l d
a s s e s s i n g damages, f
a n y ,
g a i n s t
l a i n t i f f
on
e f e n d a n t s
o u n t e r c l a i m s ,
h e o n l y r e m a i n i n g
issue n
t h i s
case.^
The
o u r t ,
l s o i n
t h e
December 4,2013 rder 1) r a n t e d d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o
s t r i k e
a n d d i s m i s s l a i n t i f T s r e p l y t o d e f e n d a n t s o u n t e r c l a i m s ; 2 )
deemed
l a i n t i f f a e x a t i o u s
l i t i g a t o r
a n d
e n j o i n e d
p l a i n t i f f
f r o m :
a )
s s e r t i n g
h i s
m e d i c a l o r
p h y s i c a l
o n d i t i o n ,
o r m e d i c a l
t r e a t m e n t t h e r e o f ,
o r
b) s s e r t i n g h i s u n a v a i l a b i l i t y b e i n g o u t o f s t a t e as a e a s o n f o r n o n -
a p p e a r a n c e o r o n - p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n c o u r t
p r o c e d u r e
b e f o r e h i s C o u r t o r S p e c i a l R e f e r e e o r a n y
C o u r t - a p p o i n t e e ,
n d
c )
e - i s s u e d t h e O r d e r s
b y J u s t i c e H a r o l d B e e l e r ,
a t e d F e b r u a r y 1 7 ,
2005,
nd
h i s
o r d e r
d a t e d
December
2 , 2 0 0 5 , n w h i c h a l l
p a r t i e s were n j o i n e d
f r o m t a k i n g
a n y
u r t h e r a c t i o n
I n t h i s m a t t e r n c l u d i n g , f i l i n g a n y m o t i o n s ,
w i t h o u t r i o r l e a v e o f
h i s C o u r t .
The l a i n t i f f a p p e a l e d t h e December 4,2013 e c i s i o n . S u b s e q u e n t l y , h i s
C o u r t
e n i e d
p l a i n t i f f s r e q u e s t o r l e a v e t o
i l e
a o t i o n t o r e a r g u e h i s C o u r t
O r d e r
d a t e d D e c e m b e r 2 4 ,
2013 h i c h
r e s o l v e d M o t i o n S e q u e n c e 067 s e e
h i s
C o u r t s n t e r i m O r d e r ,
a t e d
J a n u a r y
1 7 ,
201 4 n d i l e d
on Janua ry 22,2014).
O n e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 1 4 , h e C o u r t h e l d a a n d a t o ry C om p l i a n c e C o n f e r e n c e n P a r t 7 ,
C o u r t r o o m 341,60 e n t r e S t r e e t , N e w o r k
o r
h i s case and h e d u p l i c a t e case
o u r i
v
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
3/30
conference the l a i n t i f f pro se,
c h o s e n o t t o
appear,
i t h o u t
good
c a u se o r
h i s n o n-
appearance,
a n d
c h o s e
not o s end a n a t t o r n e y
o n h i s b e h a l f .
The defendants
appeared
a t
the
c o n f e r e n c e and t h e
C o u r t
p r o c e e d e d
t o
c o n f e r e n c e t h e
c a s e s .
On e b r u a r y
27,2014,
h i s
C o u r t
r e c e i v e d a n i n c o m p l e t e
d r a f t
copy o f a U n i t e d S t a t e s B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t i l i n g by
a c s i m i l e
from
t h e p l a i n t i f f
w i t h o u t v a l i d p r o o f
o f
sendee o
t h e
d e f e n d a n t s ,
w h i c h v i o i a t e s t h i s
C o u r t s
R u l e s . N o n e t h e l e s s ,
g i v e n
t h e s e r i o u s n e s s o f
s u c h
a
i l i n g
t h i s
C o u r t
c o n t a c t e d
t h e
U n i t e d
S t a t e s B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t and
d i s c o v e r e d
t h a t
o n
F r i d a y ,
F e b r u a r y
28,2014, l a i n t i f f f i l e d a
C h a p t e r7 a n k r u p t c y P e t i t i o n
i n The
U n i t e d S t a t e s B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t , C e n t r a l i s t r i c t o f
C a i i f o m i a , R i v e r s i d e D i v i s i o n ,
s e e k i n g t o
d i s c h a r g e
t h e
d e b t n t h i s c a s e . The B a n k r u p t c y
P e t i t i o n
f i l i n g
a u t o m a t i c a l l y
s t a y e d
h i s
S t a t e
C o u r t
p r o c e e d i n g ,
p u r s u a n t
t o
11
U . S . C .
62
{s ee C a s e
No. :14-bk-12555-WJ).
On
u l y . 1 5 , 2 0 1 4 , t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s
B a n k r u p t c y
C o u r t n C a i i f o m i a g r a n t e d t h e
d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o v a c a t e
t h e
a u t o m a t i c
s t a y ,
p u r s u a n t t o 11
U . S . C .
62. On u l y
24,
2 0 1 4 , h e p l a i n t i f f t h e n i l e d
a
N o t i c e
o f
R e m o v a l o r r e m o v a l
o f
t h e h e r e i n
c a s e 2004 Case)
Case
N o . : 1 4 - b k - 1 2 5 5 5 - W J , d v . r o c e e d i n g 6 : 1 4 - a p - 0 1 1 9 2 - W J ) n d
t h e 2008 Case Case
No. : 1 4 - b k - 12555-WJ, d v . P r o ce e d in g 6 : 1 4 - a p - 0 1 1 9 0 - W J ) . T h i s
C o u r t
r e c e i v e d C o p i e s
o f
t h e N o t i c e s t o
Rem ove
on
u l y
2 9 , 2 0 1 4 , w h i c h s t a y e d t h i s C o u r t r o m p r o c e e d i n g .
On A u g u s t 1 , 2 0 1 4 , h e H o n o r a b l e
Way ne
o h n s o n , U n i t e d
S t a t e s
B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t
J u d g e ,
h e l d
a
h e a r i n g on
t h e
p l a i n t i f f s
a p p l i c a t i o n
i n c l u d i n g
t h e
d e f e n d a n t s
o p p o s i t i o n ,
and
g r a n t e d
t h e
d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n
t o remand b o t h C o u r i
a s e s b a c k
t o
t h e
New
Y o r k S t a t e
Supreme
o u r t . - r On
e p t e m t ) e r
2 , 2 0 1 4 , u d g e J o h n s o n a l s o
d i s m i s s e d
t h e p l a i n t i f f s
C h a p t e r
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
4/30
a c t i o n s(Case No. :14-bk-12555-WJ,
roceeding
6;14-ap-01192-WJ and Adv. roceeding
6:14-ap-01190-WJ).
S u b s e q u e n t l y , on December 5,2014,JHO
Gammerman
e l d an n q u e s t ,
and
s s u e d
h i s
r e p o r t
on h e
r e c o r d
on
h a t
d a y .
At
h e i n q u e s t
t h e d e f e n d a n t s '
o u n s e l appeared
n - p e r s o n
and
h e l a i n t i f f ,
pro e , appeared by e l e p h o n e . The
r a n s c r i p t r e f l e c t s t h a t
a t some
o i n t
n e a r
t h e
b e g i n n i n g
o f t h e
i n q u e s t ,
l a i n t i f f
hung
u p h e
t e l e p h o n e and
e f u s e d t o
p a r t i c i p a t e i n
t h e
i n q u e s t , c l a i m i n g t h e a c t i o n s
o f JHO Gammerman e r e
f r a u d u l e n t
a n d
t h a t
he a c k e d n o t i c e .
H o w e v e r ,
as
l a i n t i f f
h a d
i l e d an
p p e a l
o f t h e December 4,2013 r d e r w h i c h s e t
h i s
m a t t e r
down o r an n q u e s t ,
a n d h a v i n g
a l s o
r e q u e s t e d l e a v e t o
r e a r g u e t h e December 4,2013
O r d e r ,
t
i s
e v i d e n t t h a t l a i n t i f f was w a r e t h a t t h e i n q u e s t was e n d i n g ( s e e
C o u r t
n t e r i m
o r d e r
d a t e d J a n u a r y 1 7 , 2 0 1 4
a n d
e n t e r e d o n
J a n u a r y 2 4 , 2 0 14 ) . M o r e o v e r , h e r a n s c r i p t f r o m
t h e i n q u e s t n d i c a t e s t h a t JHO
Gammerman
r i e d t o
n q u i r e a s t o
w h e t h e r
l a i n t i f f
h a d
s o u g h t
a n a d j o u r n m e n t o r s t a y o f t h e i n q u e s t
a n d
a l s o f f e r e d p l a i n t i f f a n a d j o u r n m e n t , b u t
s u c h
I n q u i r y
was
g n o r e d o r r e f u s e d ( s e e
D e c e m b e r
1 5 , 2 0 1 4
r a n s c r i p t
p .
3 ,
i n e 12 n d p . 5 , i n e 3 . T h u s ,
on
December 5 , 2 0 1 4 ,
f t e r t a k i n g
d e f e n d a n t s ' w o r n t e s t i m o n y , JHO
ammerman
recommended o h i s
C o u r t
J u d g m e n t
n
f a v o r o f h e d e f e n d a n t s '
on
h e i r c o u n t e r c l a i m s
n t h e
amount f 7 , 1 1 0 , 5 3 2 . 00 , i t h i n t e r e s t
r o m
A u g u s t 18,2003 see
December
15,2014
T r a n s c r i p t
p , 1 6 , l i n e 7,
o p .
1 7 i n e
1 6 ) .
T h e r e a f t e r ,
n
an
n t e r i m
O r d e r
d a t e d and
n t e r e d
on a n u a r y
8,2015,
h i s
C o u r t
g r a n t e d t h e
p a r t i e s
l e a v e t o i l e
a
o t i o n
t o c o nf i r m
o r e j e c t JHO Gammerman s
e p o r t . On
F e b r u a r y 1 0 , 2 0 1 5 , JHO
Gammerman
o - O r d e r e d t h e r a n s c r i p t o f t h e i n q u e s t p r o c e e d i n g a n d
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
5/30
t h e
amended e r i f i e d c o m p l a i n t , d e f e n d a n t s ' amended answer
i t h
c o u n t e r c l a i m s ,
a
copy
f h e
A p p e l l a t e D i v i s i o n ,
i r s t
D e p a r t m e n t d e c i s i o n i n C o u r i v i e b e r t , 48
AD3d
370 1 s t Dept 0 0 8 ] , a
copy f h i s C o u r t ' s O r d e r December 24,2013,
and
a
copy f h e
N o t e
o f I s s u e ,
i l e d
o n
J a n u a r y
27,2014.
The l a i n t i f f f i l e s a
r o s s - m o t i o n
b y t h e p l a i n t i f f , d a t e d A p r i l
6,2015,
o
r e j e c t
t h e
R e p o r t o f JHO Gammerman
l a i m i n g
P e r j u r y , F r a u d on h e C o u r t and
o r g i n g
and
p l a n t i n g
o f
R I e s
n
M o t i o n
Sequence
7
y J o s e p h
B u r k e ,
o r
an Order
1)
e j e c t i n g
e n t i r e l y
t h e l l e g a l and r a u d u l e n t I n q u e s t
O r d e r g r o u n d e d
on
F r a u d ,
p e r j u r y and r a u d u l e n t B u r k e 4 - 1 -
15 o t i o n i n
v i o l a t i o n
o f B e e l e r n j u n c t i o n m a n d a t i n g ' p e r m i s s i o n ' n d v i o l a t i o n s o f m a n d a t e s o f
I n q u e s t s
s i c ] , c o n d u c t e d b y
d e f a u l t
due o
m y
l l n e s s .
( 2 )
a c a t i n g t h e D e c i s i o n o f 1 2 - 2 4 - 1 3 , o n
t h e
d d ' r t i o n a l
g r o u n d s
o f
r a u d
on
h e
C o u r t , e r j u r e d
o r d e r ,
o l l u s i o n
a n d
g h o s t w r i t i n g
b y
B u r k e
o f
a n i l l e g a l l y s i c ] D e c i s i o n b e l i e d b y e v i d e n c e . 3 ) i s q u a l i f i c a t t o n o f
J o s e p h
M. u r k e
E s q .
B u r k e ] on
h e
g r o u n d s o f r a u d , p e r j u r y
and h a t he i l l
be a l l e d as
a
i t n e s s t e s t i m o n y
[ s i c ]
d e t r i m e n t a l
t o S l e b e r f P l a i n t i f f N o t i c e o f C r o s s - M o t i o n ) . The e f e n d a n t
i l e d
a
e p l y
a f f i d a v i t .
IS USSION
I t i s
w e l l , s e t t l e d
t h a t
t h e r e p o r t
o f
a p e c i a l
R e f e r e e h a l l b e c o n f i r m e d
w h e n e v e r
t h e
f i
n d i n g s c o n t a i n e d t h e r e i n a r e s u p p o r t e d b y
t h e
r e c o r d
and h e
S p e c i a l R e f e r e e has l e a r l y
d e f i n e d t h e i s s u e s and
r e s o l v e d
m a t t e r s o f r e d i b i l i t y
{ S t e i n g a r t
v H o f f m a n ,
80
AD3d 444,445
[ 1 s t
D e p t
2 0 1 1 ] ,
i t i n g
Nagerv
a n a d i s ,
238
AD2d
3 5 , 1 3 5 - 1 3 6
1 s t
D e p t
1 9 9 7 ] ;
see
l s o
M e l n i t z k y v U r i b e , 33
AD3d
373
1 s t D e p t 2 0 0 6 ] ;
K a p l a n v B i n y , 209 AD2d 248 1 s t D e p t 1 9 9 4 ] ;
N a m e r v l 5 2 - 5 ^ 5 6 W .
5 t h S t R e a A y
o / p . , 1 0 8 A D 2 d 7 0 5
1 s t D e p t
1 9 8 5 ] v
d i s m i s s e d s u b
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
6/30
he h o r o u g h l y r f v i e w e d the
i l e s ,
was a m i l i a r w i t h t h e case, heard the l a i n t i f f s
o p p o s i t i o n
t o
t h e i n q u e s t , the
e s t i m o n y
o f
w i t n e s s e s
t h a t
were u b j e c t t o
any r o s s
e x a m i n a t i o n by h e
p l a i n t i f f had he
not
hung up, and h i s f i n d i n g s are u p p o r t e d
by
the h e a r i n g t r a n s c r i p t , w a r r a n t i n g
c o n f i r m a t i o n (see
Adelaide
r o d s . , I n c . v
BKN
n t l . AG 1 AD3d
598
1 s t Dept 2008] lhe
S p e c i a l Referee l e a r l y d e f i n e d the s s u e s and r e s o l v e d m a t t e r s o f r e d i b i l i t y , and
had
ample
s u p p o r t
of ho se
i n d i n g s i n t h e r e c o r d
and h i s
r e p o r t w a r r a n t e d
c o n f i r m a n c e ] ;
see
l s o
Nager v
P a n a d l s ,
51 AD3d
598
1 s t Dept 9 9 8 ] ) .
Based
upon
h e f o r e g o i n g , d e f e n d a n t s ' m o t i o n
t o
c o n f i r m
t h e Report and Recommendation of
JHO ammerman s g r a n t e d and l a i n t i f r s
c r o s s -
m o t i o n t o
r e j e c t t h e R e f e r e e ' s R e p o r t s d e n i e d
( s e e
M a k e r
o f
m y t h e v G o o r d , 1 A D 3 d 6 0 8
[2d
Dept 2007]
T h e r e
i s
no
v i d e n c e
i n
t h e r e c o r d t o s u p p o r t t h e
p l a i n t i f q ' s
c o n t e n t i o n t h a t
t h e
h e a r i n g o f f i c e r
was
biased... nd h e r e
i s
no
n d i c a t i o n t h a t t h e outcome f t h e
h e a r i n g was
a f f e c t e d
by
any
l l e g e d b i a s o n h e p a r t o f t h e
h e a r i n g
o f f i c e r ] ) .
S p e c i f i c a l l y , t h e p o r t i o n o f l a i n t i f f s
c r o s s - m o t i o n s e e k i n g
t o r e j e c t
JHO
Gammerman s
R e p o r t and Recommendatio n as
l l e g a l
and
b a s e d
o n r a u d
and
e r j u r y b y d e f e n d a n t ' s a t t o r n e y
Burke and n v i o l a t i o n o f J u s t i c e B e e l e r ' s Order
a n d a t i n g
t h e p a r t i e s
secure
p e r m i s s i o n '
b e f o r e i l i n g , i s
d e n i e d .
The
e c o r d does o t u p p o r t any
r a u d
o r
p e r j u r y b y
d e f e n d a n t s o r t h e i r
a t t o r n e y B u r k e . T h i s C o u r t a l s o g r a n t e d l e a v e f o r t h e
p a r t i e s
t o
i l e a p p l i c a t i o n s
t o c o n f i r m
o r
r e j e c t JHO Gammer man s
e p o r t ,
t h u s c o m p l y i n g w i t h J u s t i c e
H a r o l d
B e e l e r ' s
O r d e r and
h i s
C o u r t ' s
Order
dated
December 24,2013.
The o r t i o n o f l a i n t i f f s c r o s s - m o t i o n t o v a c a t e h i s
C o u r t ' s o r d e r ,
d a t e d December 4 ,
2013,
i x t e e n months
f t e r t h e
i n i t i a l d e c i s i o n
i s d e n i e d . P l a i n t i f f
makes
h i s
a p p l i c a t i o n a f t e r
he
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
7/30
v i o l a t i n g the
C o u r t ' s p r e v i o u s Order and
w i t h o u t l e a v e
o f
the
C o u r t .
Moreover, he Court
a d d i t i o n a l l y f i n d s t h a t
the
h e r e i n a p p l i c a t i o n i s i n d i c a t i v e of a p a t t e r n by h e p l a i n t i f f t o
c o n t i n u a l i y
f i l e
m u i t i p l e motions o
vacate
or reargue e c i s i o n s , w i t h o u t s u f f i c i e n t
s u p p o r t ,
h a t
h a v e
been a d v e r s e l y r u l e d
a g a i n s t
him.
R e g a r d i n g t j i e p l i n t i f f s c r o s s - m o t i o n t o d i s q u l i f y J o s e p h B u r k e , d e f e n d a n t s o u n s e i ,
i s
w e l i
s e t t l e d
t h a t
[ Q h e
d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n
o f
an
a t t o r n e y
i s
a
m a t t e r t h a t r e s t s
w i t h i n
t h e
sound
d i s c r e t i o n
o f t h e coyrf
F l o r e s
v W i l l a r c J J .
P r i c e
A s s o c s . ,
LLC,20
AD3d 343,344
1 s t
Dept
2 0 0 5 ] ; s e e W e l l s Fargo
Bank, . A . v
C a m ,82
AD3d 880,881
2 d
Dept
0 1 1 ] ;
F a l k
v
G a l l o , 73
AD3d
6 8 5 , 685
2 d
D e p t 2 0 1 0 ] ; H a r r i s
v
S c u i c o , 86 AD3d 4 8 1 , 4 8 1 [ 1 s t D e p t 2 0 0 9 ] ) . The i g h t
t o
c o u n s e i i s n o t
a b s o l u t e and m a y be v e r r i d d e n
where n e c e s s a r y .
..
u t
t
i s a a l u e d r i g h t
a n d a n y r e s t r i c t i o n
m u s t
b e
a r e f u l l y s c r u t i n i z e d
{S&S
o t e l V e n t u r e s t d . P a r t n e r s h i p v tn
S . H . C o r p . ,
69
NY2d 437,443 1 9 8 7 ] ; see MaUerofAbrams
J o h n
A n o n y m o u s ] ,62
NY2d 1 8 3 ,
1 9 6
1 9 8 4 ] ) .
A p a r ^ s n t i t l e m e n t t o b e r e p r e s e n t e d
i n
o n g o i n g i t i g t i o n b y c o u n s e l o f h i s o r
h e r
o w n h o o s i n g . :. h o u l d n o t
be
b r i d g e d a b s e n t a l e a r s h o w i n g
t h a t
i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n i s
w a r r a n t e d '
G u l i n o y
G u l i n o ,
35
AD3d
8 1 2 , 8 1 2 2 d
D e p t
2 0 0 6 ] ;
s e e
S S
o t e l
V e n t u r e s t d .
P a r t n e r s h i p ,
69
NY2d
a t 4 4 3 ; M a t t e r o f b r a m s , 82 NY2d a t 1 9 6 ; Campotongo v C a m p o l o n g o ,
2
D3d
476,476 2 d
D e p t
2 0 0 3 ] ;
Domlnguez Community e a l t h
P l a n
o f
u f f o l k , 284 AD2d
2 9 4 , 2 9 4 , 2 d D e p t 2 0 01 ] ) . A c c o r d i n g l y , m o t i o n s t o d i s q u a l i f y
o p p o s i n g c o u n s e l a r e
d i s f a v o r e d
.
..
and
r e q u i r e
a
h i g h
s t a n d a r d o f
p r o o f
{ C i a o - D I R e s t .
C o r p . v P a x t o n 3 5 0 ,
LLC,
22
i s c
3d
1 1 1 7 [ A ] ,
a t
*2 Sup
C t , N Y
C o u n t y 2 0 0 8 ] ; s e e
o l d s m i t h
v E l e n b e r g , 2013WL
1 4 2 2 6 4 ,
B ,
2013 N Y M i s c
LEXIS 1 9 9 7 ,
1 7
[Sup C t ,
N Y
C o u n t y
2 0 1 3 ] ; see
l s o N o r t h w e s t e r n
N a t l .
I n s . C o .
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
8/30
3 . 7 of h e Rules of r o f e s s i o n a l
Conduct
22 NYCRR 2 0 0 . 0 ) H a r r i s ,
86 AD3d a t 481[The
d e c i s i o n whether
d d i s q u a l i f y an
a t t o r n e y r e s t s
i n
t h e
sound
d i s c r e t i o n of h e cou r f ; s e e
S S
H o t e l V e n t u r e s L t d
P a r t n e r s h l p ,
69
Y2d
a t 443;
a l k ,
73 D3d a t 6 8 6 ) . C o u r t s
must
o n s i d e r
t h e
o t a l i t y o f
t h e
c i r c u m s t a n c e s F e r o l l t o v V u H a g g l o , 99 AD3d 19,27
1 s t
Dept
0 1 2 ] ,
u o t i n g
A b s e l e t v a t r a R e a l t y ,
LLC,85
AD3d
1406,1407
3d Dept
0 1 1 ) ; s e e
Pamesy a m e s ,80
AD3d
948,952
3d
Dept
201
j ) ,
and
must
a k e c a r e t o
a v o i d
m e c h a n i c a l
a p p l i c a t i o n
o f
b l a n k e t
r u l e s ' P e l l e g r i n o v Oppenheimer
o . , n c . ,49
D3d 94,98 1 s t Dept 0 0 8 ] , u o t i n g Teknh
P l e x , n c . V
Meynet
a n d l s ,89
Y2d
123,132 1 9 9 6 ] ; s e eS S o t e l V e n t u r e s
L t d .
P a r t n e r s h i p , 69 Y2d a t 4 4 4 ) . The u n c t i o n
of h e
c o u r t o n such a m o t i o n i s r e s t r i c t e d t o
t h e
t a k i n g
o f
such
a c t i o n as
may be
n e c e s s a r y
t o I n s u r e a p r o p e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e p a r t i e s and
f a i r n e s s
i n t h e c o n d u c t o f t h e
i t i g a t i o n {Young v
Oa k
C r e s t
a i k ,
n c . , 75 AD2d 956,957 3d
Dept
1 9 8 0 ] ; s e e
Booth v
C o n t i n e n t a l
n s .
C o . ,
167 Misc 2d
429,436 Sup
C t ,
Westchester
C o u n t y
1 9 9 5 ] ) .
T h e l a i n t i f f s
c r o s s - m o t i o n
t o d i s q u a l i f y d e f e n d a n t s c o u n s e l i s d e n i e d .
There
s n o
c r e d i b l e
or r a t i o n a l b a s t s i n the C o u rfs e c o r d t o
support
s u c h an a p p l i c a t i o n .
Moreover,
p l a i n t i f f s c r o s s - m o t i o n t o d i s q u a l i f y B u r k e s a t l e a s t
t h e
t e n t h such m o t i o n f o r same,and t h i s
C o u r t c o n c l u d e ^
h i t
i t
i s
f r i v o l o u s , t o t a l l y
w i t h o u t
m e r i t , a n d u n s u p p o r t e d
b y
t h e C o u r t
e c o r d ,
and
s d e s i g n e d t o h a r a s s
and annoy
h e d e f e n d a n t
and h i s a t t o r n e y . Thus,
h e c r o s s - m o t i o n
v i o l a t e s
Rule
1 3 0 . 1 - 1
and
as
such
p l a i n t i f f
i s
s u b j e c t
t o
s a n c t i o n s .
F i n a l l y , p l a i n t i f f
has
been c l a i m i n g
he
u f f e r s r o m
a e r i o u s l l n e s s s i n c e
t h e i n c e p t i o n
o f
t h i s ca se i n c e t w a s i l e d i n 2004. He as
c ho s e n
t o
proceed
pro se, u t
c o n t i n u a l l y
a s s e r t s
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
9/30
c o n t i n u e s t o
i l e m u l t i p l e
m o t i o n s o v e r
and
o v e r and o t > o m b a r d t h e
Court
i t h ex
p a r t e
f a c s i m i l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s , n
v i o l a t i o n
o f
h i s
C o u r t ' s
R u l e s .
The
o u r t
once
g a i n c o n c l u d e s
f r o m
t h e
h e a r i n i g
e v i d e n c e ,
n c l u d i n g
t e l e p h o n e
c a l l s t o
t h e
C o u r t and l a i n t i f f s
a b u s i v e
n a t u r e
towards Court
e r s o n n e l
by
e l e p h o n e ,
t h a t
he c o n t i n u e s t o be a
v e x a t i o u s i t i g a t o r
and i s
n e e d l e s s l y
p r o l o n g i n g
t h i s a c t i o n
t o
harass the
d e f e n d a n t ,
h i s a t t o r n e y ,
and
n e e d l e s s l y
exhausts h i s
C o u r t ' s
resources i t h motions
o m p l e t e l y
devoid
of e r i t .
I n
a d d i t i o n p l a i n t i f f
has
been r e p e a t e d l y
w a m e d
about
such
a c t i o n
see,
n t e r l i a
m o t i o n sequences 047,058, a t e d August 3,2010, o t i o n sequences 055,054,
a t e d J u l y 6,
2010, . 3111. o t i o n sequences 060,061,062,063, 065,
a t e d June
30,2011, o t i o n
sequences 042,064, a t e d September
27,2011,
n t e r i m
C o u r t
o r d e r ,
d a t e d
J a n u a r y
17,2014,
p . ;
n t e r i m C o u r t
O r d e r , d a t e d F e b r u a r y 1 8 , 2 0 1 4 , .3 , m o t i o n sequence
067, a t e d
December
4 , 2 0 1 3 ) . P l a i n t i f f
w a s
i v e n ample n o t i c e
and
o p p o r t u n i t y
t o a v o i d s a n c t i o n s and
an
n j u n c t i o n see o w l e r
v
o n f o r t I , 194
A D 2 d
394,598 NY2d 789 1 s t
Dept 1993]
l h e
i m p o s i t i o n
o f
t h e maxi m um s a n c t i o n o f $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 o r
f d v o l o u s
c o n d u c t w a s p p r o p r i a t e n t h i s
c i r c u m s t a n c e s i n c e p l a i n t i f f w a s o r e w a r n e d
a b o u t
t h e d u b i o u s n a t u r e o f h i s a c t i o n and
u r t h e r
b e c a u s e
t h e
p l a i n t i f f has e p e a t e d l y engaged n v e x a t i o u s i t i g a t i o n a r i s i n g
f r o m
t h e o r i g i n a l .
. .
c a s e ] ) .
CONCLUSION
A c c o r d i n g l y t
i s ,
ORDERED
h a t
d e f e n d a n t ' s
m o t i o n
p u r s u a n t t o CPLR
4 0 3
and
2 0 2 . 4 4
o f h e
U n i f o r m
R u l e s
o r
t h e N e w
York
S up re m e o u r t t o
c o n f i r m
i n i t s e n t i r e t y t h e R e p o r t and
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
10/30
f f
Recommendation
o f
JHO r a Gam m erm a n, a t e d F e b r u a r y
10,2Q15
s
d e n i e d i n i t s e n t i r e t y ;
a n d t i s f u r t h e r ,
OR ERE h a t defendants are awarded judgmen t on h e i r c o u n t e r c l a i m s a g a i n s t the
p l a i n t i f f I n t h e
amount f $ 7 , 1 1 0 , 5 3 2 . 0 0 ,
w i t h i nt e r e s t f r o r p August 18,2003;
and
t
I s f u r t h e r ,
OR ERE h a t
t he
Orders of u s t i c e Harold Beeler, a n d
t he Order of
h i s
Court dated
December 12,2005 r e
t i l l
i n p l a c e
and
r e r e i s s u e d ,
and
t h e h e r e i n p a r t i e s a r e e n j o i n e d from
t a k i n g any u r t h e r
a c t i o n i n
t h i s m a t t e r i n c l u d i n g , i l i n g
any
m o t i o n s , or
i l i n g
any
n e w
c t i o n s
b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t , w i t h o u t p r i o r l e a v e o f
t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e J u s t i c e
o f t h i s
C o u r t ;
and t
i s f u r t h e r ,
OR ERE h a t p l a i n t i f f i s c o n t i n u i d d t o be
d e e m e d
a e x a t i o u s i t i g a t o r and i s e n j o i n e d
f r o m :
(1)
s s e r t i n g
h i s
m e d i c a l
or h y s i c a l
c o n d i t i o n ,
o r
m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t
t h e r e o f , or
2)
a s s e r t i n g
h i s u n a v a i l a b i l i t y b e i n g o u t o f
s t a t e
a s a e a s o n f o r non-appearance o r
non-
p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n i ^ u r t p r o c e d u r e b e f o r e h i s C o u r t o r S p e c i a l R e f e r e e o r a n y C o u r t - a p p o i n t e e
t h e r e o f ; a n d t
i s
f u r t h e r ,
OR ERE h a t the C l e r k
of
the Court
and
the County C l e r k of New ork County
are
o r d e r e d n o t
t o
a c c e p t any u r t h e r p a p e r s n
c o n n e c t i o n w i t h
t h i s
m a t t e r ,
n c l u d i n g
any m o t i o n s ,
n o r s
p l a i n t i f f a l l o w e d t o c o m m e n c e any n e w c t i o n s w i t h o u t p r i o r
l e a v e
o f t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e
J u s t i c e of
h i s
Court; a n d t i s f u r t h e r ,
OR ERE
h a t
t h e d e f e n d a n t s
s h a l l s e r v e a copy o f t h i s Order i t h N o t i c e o f E n t r y
on
the
l a i n t i f f
Ja m e s
o u r i
and
the C l e r k of he
Court
w h o s
d i r e c t e d
t o
e n t e r
judgment
a c c o r d i n g l y .
T h i s c o n k i t u t e s t h e D e c i s i o n a n d 0 ( d e r f h e ^ o u r t .
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
11/30
1 SUPREME
COURT OF
THE
STATEOF
NEW
YORK EW
YORK
COUNTY
PRESENT:
HON.
PAULWOOTEN
PART_Z_
Justice
JAMESCOURi
PlalnW,
INDEX
NO.
113812/08
- against
JOHN
SIEBERT
nd
JOHNW
IEBERT MD.
C.,
Defendants.
NO. 005
Notice
of otion/
Order
oShow
CauseAffidavits
~
xhibits
A n s w e r i n a
f f i d a v i t s
x h i b i t s
M e m o l
\ filed
R e p l y i n g A f f i d a v i t s R e p l y Memol
f
r - _
A H
2
I I
C r o s s - M o t i o n :U es No nn.nmrrtrmmi
j.
V B M ' i O P K
Now e f o r e t h e C o u r t s a o t i o n
by
d n f e s C o u r i
p l a i n t i f f ) ,
p u r s u a n t o
CPLR
126,
o r
an r d e r t r i k i n g t h e d e f e n d a n t s ' answer and f f i r m a t i v e
d e f e n s e s
and
e t t i n g t h i s
m a t t e r down
f o r an n q u e s t
as
o damages on h e b a s i s o f d e f e n d a n t s '
e f u s a l
t o
comply i t h d i s c o v e r y
demands e r v e d i n 2009, r d e r i n g d e f e n d a n t s
o
p r o d u c e
documents and
p r o d u c e d e f e n d a n t
J o h n
S i e b e r t
o r a e p o s i t i o n . l a i n t i f f
a l s o
s e e k s
i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n
o f e f e n d a n t s ' o u n s e l
J o s e p h
M.
u r k e , Esq.
B u r k e ) . D e f e n d a n t s a r e n o p p o s i t i o n
t o t h e m o t i o n , and h e p l a i n t i f f
s u b m i t s
a
r e p l y .
DISCUSSION
T h i s
a c t i o n
2008 Case) as i l e d b y t h e
p l a i n t i f f ,
p r o e , and h i c h t h e C o u r t n o t e s
d u p l i c a t l v e
o f
a n o t h e r
a c t i o n
p e n d i n g b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t i n C o u r i
v
S i e b e r t , under n d e x n o .
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
12/30
i n j u n c t i o n
w h i c h p r o h i b i t e d
b o t h
p a r t i e s from
commencing a
new
a c t i o n o r
i l i n g
a
new
m o t i o n
w i t h o u t
l e a v e
or
p e r m i s s i o n o f
the Court
Order
dated
December 12,2005
and
February
17 ,
2006). P i a i n t i f T s c o m p l a i n t and c o u n t e r c l a i m s were subsequently d i s m i s s e d
by
the
A p p e l l a t e
D i v i s i o n ,
F i r s t Department
n F e b r u a r y 2008, h e r e i n t h e A p p e l l a t e
D i v i s i o n
g r a n t e d
t h e
d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o t r i k e
t h e
c l a i m s b a s e d u p o n p l a i n t i f f s c o n t i n u e d
f l l u r e
t o
c o m p l y
w i t h
d i s c o v e r y d e m a n d s o r
h i s
t a x retums, u t the d e f e n d a n t s o u n t e r c l a i m remained see Couri
v
S i e b e r t ,
8 D3d
370 1 s t
Dept 0 0 8 ] ) .
With the consent
o f
the
A d m i n i s t r a t i v e
J u s t i c e ,
the
Honorable Michael
J . Stallman, a
p r i o r Judge
a s s i g n e d
t o
t h e
2004 Case, r a n t e d
t h e
p l a i n t i f f s o n e - t i m e a p p l i c a t i o n t o i l e a new
a c t i o n . Thus, o n o r about O c t o b e r 7,2008, l a i n t i f f co m menced h e h e r e i n a c t i o n ,
by
S u m m o n s
w i t h N o t i c e ,
and
s u b s e q u e n t l y
i l e d
a o m p l a i n t . D e f e n d a n t
i l e d an answer w i t h c o u n t e r c l a i m s
and issue
was o i n e d .
I n t h e 2004 Case, h i s C o u r t g r a n t e d d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o s t r i k e p l a i n t i f f s r e p l y
t o
d e f e n d a n t s o u n t e r c l a i m s
and
d i s m i s s e d t h e
p l a i n t i f f s
c o u n t e r c l a i m s by
Court
r d e r ,
dated
December
24,2013,
n t e r
l i a
f o r
f a i l u r e
t o
comply
w i t h
d i s c o v e r y o r d e r s .
I n
s o
o i n g
t h i s
C o u r t
l a b e l e d t h e p l a i n t i f f a
v e x a t i o u s i t i g a t o r
and
1)
r a n t e d d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o s t r i k e an d
d i s m i s s p l a i n t i f f s r e p l y t o d e f e n d a n t s o u n t e r c l a i m s ;
2)
eemed
l a i n t i f f
a
v e x a t i o u s
l i t i g a t o r
and
e n j o i n e d
p l a i n t i f f
from:
a) s s e r t i n g
h i s
m e d i c a l
o r
p h y s i c a l
c o n d i t i o n ,
o r m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t
t h e r e o f , o r b) s s e r t i n g
h i s
u n a v a i l a b i l i t y
b e i n g
o u t o f s t a t e as a
r e a s o n
f o r non-appearance
r
n o n - p a r t i c i p a t i o n
i n
c o u r t p r o c e d u r e
b e f o r e
t h i s C o u r t o r S p e c i a l Referee r any C o u r t -
a p p o i n t e e ,
and 3) e - i s s u e d t h e i n t e r i m o r d e r s by J u s t i c e
H a r o l d
B e e i e r ,
d a t e d F e b r u a r y
1 7 ,
2005,and h i s o r d e r dated December 12.2005,
n
which
i l
p a r t i e s were n j o i n e d f r o m t a k i n g
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
13/30
f o r h i s n o n - a p p e a r a n c e o r t o send an
a t t o r n e y
on
h i s
b e h a l f .
The
e f e n d a n t s a p p e a r e d a t t h e
c o n f e r e n c e
a n d
t h e
Court proceeded t o
c o n f e r e n c e the cases.
Moreover, he
r e l i e f sought by h e
p l a i n t i f f i n t h i s
m o t i o n , o w i t , d i s c o v e r y
from
the
d e f e n d a n t s
a n d h e d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n
o f Burke
s d u p l i c a t i v e o f p r e v i o u s m o t i o n s i l e d i n
the
2004
C a s e . I n t h i s motion
p l a i n t i f f
s e e k s
o r e - I H i g a t e i s s u e s t h a t
ha v e b een r e s o l v e d
by n u m e r o u s
O r d e r s , n c l u d i n g M o t i o n
Seque n ce 069
n t h e 2004 Case,
and
a r e t h u s d e n i e d
as
m o o t ,
b a r r e d
by
h e
d o c t r i n e s
o f
r e s u d i c a t a see a r k e r v l a u v e l t V o l u n t e e r F i r e
C o . , 93
NY2d
343,347
[ 1 9 9 9 ]
U n d e r r e s u d i c a t a ,
o r
daim p r e c l u s i o n ,
a
a l i d
f i n a l
j u d g m e n t
b a r s
f u t u r e a c t i o n s
b e t w e e n t h e
s a m e
a r t i e s on h e s a m e a u s e o f c t i o n ] ;
S e r i o v
Town o f
s l l p ,
87
AD3d 5 3 3 ,
534 2 d
D e p t
2 0 1 1 ] a l t h o u g h
t h e p l a i n t i f f a l i e g e s n t h e i n s t a n t
a c t i o n
t h a t t h e d e f e n d an t s
e n g a g e d
i n
f r a u d ,
h i s
p u r p o r t e d
new
c i a i m
o r
t h e o r y
i s
g r o u n d e d
on
h e
s a m e
r a n s a c t i o n
o r
s e r i e s
o f
t r a n s a c t i o n s as h e
p r i o r
a c t i o n ] ;
Y o n k e r s
C o n t r .
C o . , n c .
v
P o r t A u t h . T r a n s - H u d s o n
C o r p . ,
93
NY2d
3 7 5 , 380 1 9 9 9 ] a
f i n a l
c o n d u s i o n may e n d i c a t e d
b y
t h e
c o u r t
t h r o u g h t h e
u s e o f
o n t h e
m e r i t s
o r
d i s m i s s a l w i t h p r e j u d i c e
l a n g u a g e , b o t h i n t e r c h a ng e a b l y
u s e d
t o
p r e d u d e u r t h e r l i t i g a t i o n
on
h e
m a t t e r ] ) ,
a n d
c o l l a t e r a l e s t o p p e l [ t ] h e
p a r t y s e e k i n g
t h e
b e n e f i t o f o l l a t e r a l
e s t o p p e l
m u s t d e m o n s t r a t e h a t
t h e
i d e n t i c a l
i s s u e
was e c e s s a r i l y
d e d d e d
i n t h e p r i o r
a d j u d i c a t i o n a n d i s
d e c i s i v e
i n
t h e n e w l y
p r e s e n t e d c i r c u m s t a n c e a n d f o r u m . To
b l o c k t h e u s e
o f
e s t o p p e l , a c o n t e s t a n t c a n
show
h e a b s e n c e o f a u l l and a i r o p p o r t u n i t y t o
p r e s e n t r e l e v an f v i e w s i n
t h e
p r i o r c o n t e s f { D a vi d
v B l o n d e ,
92 NY2d 3 1 8 , 3 2 2
1 9 9 8 ] ) .
T h u s , l a i n t i f f s m o t i o n
i s
d e n i e d o n t h e b a s i s t h a t
1 )
t
v i o l a t e s
J u s t i c e B e e l e r i s O r d e r s ,
and h i s
C o u r t ' s
o r d e r ,
d a t e d December
4 , 2 0 1 3 . w h i c h l a b e l s p l a i n t i f f a v e x a t i o u s l i t i g a t o r and
e n j o i n s
t h e p a r t i e s f r o m f i l i n g s u c h m o t i o n s w i t h o u t l e a v e o f t h e
C o u r t ;
2 )
l a i n t i f f
i m p r o p e r l y
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
14/30
p l a i n t i f f
a e l e p h o n e c o n f e r e n c e
w i t h
t h e . o u r t
t o
c o n s i d e r
g r a n t i n g
h i m
l e a v e t o i l e t h i s
m o t i o n ,
w h i c h
p l a i n t i f f
i g n o r e d ,
and
he
u b s e q u e n t l y
i l e d
t h i s
m o t i o n
w i t h o u t
l e a v e o f t h e
C o u r t
{see
Court
r d e r dated p r i l
6,2015).
F u r t h e r m o r e , l a i n t i f f has made numerous
t h e r
motions o i s q u a l i f y Burke rom
r e p r e s e n t i n g
the
e f e n d a n t s ,
which
have
l i
been e n i e d .
As uch,
he
o r t i o n of
l a i n t i f f s
m o t i o n
h e r e i n
s e e k i n g
t o
d i s q u a l i f y
d e f e n d a n t s '
o u n s e l
i s d e n i e d . There s no
r e d i b l e
o r
r a t i o n a l b a s i s i n
t h e
C o u r t ' s r e c o r d t o s u p p o r t - s u c h an p p l i c a t i o n see
i a o - D i Rest C o r p .
v
Paxton
350,
LLC, 2
isc
d
1 1 7 I A ] , a t *2
Sup
t . NY
ounty
20081 rmotions o
d i s q u a l i f y
o p p o s i n g
c o u n s e l a r e
d i s f a v o r e d . .. nd
r e q u i r e a
i g h s t a n d a r d
o f
proof] ;
G o l d s m i t h v
E l l e n b e r g , 20^3WL 142264,
8,2013
NY i s c LEXIS 9 9 7 ,
*17
Sup t , NY o u n t y
2 0 1 3 ] ;
see
l s o
Northwestem
/ a t f .
I n s .
Co.
v
n s c o ,
L t d . ,
2011 WL 552997,
4,2011
US
i s t
LEXIS
1 1 3 6 2 6 ,
3 1 [SD
NY
0 1 1 ] ; T r a d e w l n d s i r l i n e s , I n c . v S o r o s , 2009WL 3 2 1 6 9 5 , 3 , 2 0 0 9 US
D i s t LEXIS 0689, 9 SD NY 0 0 9 ] ; F l o r a s v i l l a r d J .
P r i c e
A s s o c s . , LLC, 0
AD3d
3 4 3 , 3 4 4
[ 1 s t
D e p t
2005] M h e
i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n
o f
a n a t t o r n e y
s
a
a t t e r t h a t
r e s t s w i t h i n t h e
s o u n d
d i s c r e t i o n
o f
t h e
c o u r f
;
see
e l l s
F a r g o B a n k ,
N . A .
v
a r o ,
8 2
D3d
880,881
2 d D e p t
2 0 1 1 ] ;
F a l k v G a l l o ,
73
D 3 d
6 8 5 , 6 8 5 2 d D e p t 2 0 1 0 ] ;
a r r i $
v S c u i c o ,
3 6 A D 3 d 4 8 1 . 4 8 1
I s t D e p t
2009]).
M o r e o v e r , l a i n t i f f s m o t i o n
t o
d i s q u a l i f y B u r k e
as
e f e n d a n t s ' o u n s e l s
a t
l e a s t t h e
t e n t h s u c h m o t i o n t o d i s q u a l i f y h i m and h i s C o u r t c o n c l u d e s
t h a t
t
i s f r i v o l o u s , t o t a l l y
w i t h o u t
m e r i t ,
a n d
c o m p l e t e l y u n s u p p o r t e d b y t h e
C o u r t
r e c o r d
s u c h
t h a t
t h e
C o u r t deems
t
t o
be
d e s i g n e d t o h a r a s s a n d a n n o y
t h e
d e f e n d a n t a n d h i s a t t o r n e y .
P l a i n t i f f
s o u g h t i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n
i n
t h e
2004 Case as
e c e n t l y
as o t i o n Sequence
69,
h i c h was l s o d e n i e d ,
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
15/30
T a v e l l a
25 AD3d 523,524 1 s t D e p t 2 0 0 6 ] ) .
P l a i n t i f f
a c t i n g
p r o
s e , h a s e n g a g e d i n a
a t t e r n
o f a b u s i v e
i i t i g a t i o n
a g a i n s t t h e d e f e n d a n t b y i l i n g e x p e n s i v e f r i v o l o u s and d u p l i c a t i v e m o t i o n s
d e s i g n e d t o
h a r a s s ,
i n j u r e and annoy h e
d e f e n d a n t , and as
a
e s u l t
p l a i n t i f f
s s u b j e c t t o
sanctions.
P l a i n t i f f i n t h e 2004 Case p r e v i o u s l y f i l e d more than i x
summary
udgment
m o t i o n s ,
m u l t i p l e f r i v o l o u s motions o v a c a t e , motions o
r e a r g u e ,
m u l t i p l e motions o d i s q u a l i f y
d e f e n d a n t s o u n s e l , and
m o t i o n s s e e k i n g
t o
r e c u s e u d i c i a l
o f f i c e r s t h a t
r u l e a d v e r s e t o h i s
p o s i t i o n ,
and
l m o s t
l l
o f t h e m o t i o n s r e p e a t e d l y a l l e g e t h e
same
r g u m e n t s . M o r e o v e r ,
p l a i n t i f f s
i n t e n t ,
n
b o t h
t h e 2008 and h e 2004 Cases, s
t o
p r o l o n g t h e r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e
m a t t e r
as
a
means
f h a r a s s i n g t h e d e f e n d a n t , and o w a s t e u d i c i a l r e s o u r c e s w h i c h i s e v i d e n t f r o m :
( 1 )
l a i n t i f f s
c h o i c e
t o
p r o c e e d
p r o s e , a n d
c o n t i n u e d
r e p e a t e d
f r i v o l o u s
m o t i o n
p r a p t i c e
d e s p i t e
w a r n i n g s
by h e
C o u r t and r d e r s ;
2 )
l a i n t i f f s
f a i l u r e
t o
make
o u r t
a p p e a r a n c e s f o r
good
c a u s e i n o r d e r t o r e p r e s e n t h i m s e l f
o r
t o
p r o v i d e an
t t o r n e y f o r
same; 3)
e p e a t e d l y r e f u s i n g
o r i g n o r i n g C o u r t
o r d er s t o c o o p e r a t e
w i t h
t h e
d i s c o v e r y
p r o c e s s ;
4 ) e r b a l l y
a b u s i n g
C o u r t
p e r s o n n e l
b y t e l e p h o n e a n d r e p e a t e d l y
l e a v i n g
h a r a s s i n g
a n d t h r e a t e n i n g m e s s a g e s
o n
t h e
C o u r t
m e s s a g e s y s t e m ; a n d
( 5 )
i s r e p e a t e d i n s i s t e n c e f o r m o r e t h a n 1 1 y e a r s ,
h a t
h e s t o o
t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n C o u r t p r o c e d u r e s , a p p e a r a n c e s a n d c o n f e r e n c e s
w h e n e v e r
t h e C o u r t s e e k s
t o
move h i s case or respond
o
h i s telephone e q u e s t s .
The
l a i n t i f f
h a s c h o s e n t o
p r o c e e d
p r o se when h e
i l e d
t h i s
a c t i o n
i n
2004
n d 2 0 0 8 ,
a n d h a s
a l s o p r o f f e r e d
a n
u n d o c u m e n t e d i l l n e s s w h i c h h a s
k e p t
h i m f r o m p r o s e c u t i n g t h i s
a c t i o n s i n c e 2004. P l a i n t i f f has o t
s u b s t a n t i a t e d any
such l l n e s s as he has a i l e d t o
t i m e l y
p r o v i d e t h e p r o p e r me d i c a l a u t h o r i z a t i o n s a n d h e h a s a i l e d
t o
p r o v i d e
v a l i d d o c u m e n t a t i o n
o f
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
16/30
f a i l u r e t o
f o l l o w
t h i s C o u r t ' s i n j u n c t i o n r e q u i r i n g
t h a t
he b t a i n p e r m i s s i o n of he Court r i o r t o
f i l i n g
any
new c t i o n o r
m o t i o n , a n d / o r warned h e
p l a i n t i f f t h a t
t h i s c o n t i n u e d
a c t i o n would
be
s a n c t i o n a b l e
see M o t i o n Sequences 047,058, rder a t e d A u g u s t . 3 , 2 0 1 0 , M o t i o n Sequences
055,054,
r d e r d a t e d
J u l y 6,2010,
.
3
, M o t i o n Sequence
060,061,062,063,065,
r d e r
d a t e d
June
30,2011,
o t i o n
Sequence 042,064, rder
a t e d September
27,2011, n t e r i m
C o u r t
O r d e r , d a t e d
J a n u a r y
17,2014, .
2
; n t e r i m C o u r t O r d e r , d a t e d F e b r u a r y
18,2014,
.
3 7 o t i o n sequence 067, a t e d December 4 , 2 0 1 3 ) . N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h e p u b l i c p o l i c y
r e q u i r i n g
f r e e a c c e s s
t o t h e
c o u r t s ,
t h e
m o t i o n c o u r t ' s
o r d e r
b a r r i n g p l a i n t i f f f r o m
i n i t i a t i n g
f u r t h e r
i t i g a t i o n o r
m o t i o n p r a c t i c e a g a i n s t
d e f e n d a n t s w i t h o u t
p r i o r c o u r t
a p p r o v a l
u n l e s s he s
r e p r e s e n t e d
b y c o u n s e l was u s t i f i e d b y
p i a i n f r i f
s
o n t i n u o u s
a n d v e x a t i o u s
l i t i g a t i o n
a g a i n s t
d e f e n d a n t s '
B a n u s h i
v Law
f f .
o f
c o t t
W.
p s t e i n ,
1 1 1 AD3d
558,558
1 s t
D e p t
2 0 1 3 ] ;
B r e y t m a n v P i n n a c l e
G r o u p , 110 AD3d
754
2 d D e p t
2 0 1 3 ] w h i l e p u b l i c p o l i c y
m a n d a t e s
f r e e
a c c e s s t o t h e c o u r t s , when
a
i t i g a n t
i s
a b u s i n g
t h e u d i c i a l p r o c e s s b y
h a r a s s i n g
i n d i v i d u a l s
s o l e l y o u t o f l l
w i l l
o r
p i t e ,
e q u i t y
may
n j o i n
s u c h v e x a t i o u s
i t i g a t i o n ] ; D I m e r y v U l s t e r
S a v i n g s B a n k ,
82 D3d1034 2 d
D e p t 2 0 1 1 ] ) ; r t ) - B r a s i l
R e s s e g u r o s
S . A . ,
59 AD3d t
366
[ T h e c o u r t p r o p e r l y i n v o k e d
I t s
e q u i t y p o w e r
t o
e n j o i n d e f e n d a n t s f r o m p r o s e c u t i n g t h e
a c t i o n .
..
n o r d e r t o
p r e v e n t t h e
w a s t e
o f
u d i c i a l
r e s o u r c e s , u n n e c e s s a r y l e g a l
e x p e n s e s ,
a n d
d u p l i c a t i v e
l i t i g a t i o n
t h a t
m i g h t l e a d
t o c o n f l i c t i n g
r e s u l t s ' ] C o u r i
v
S i e b e r t ,
4 8
AD3d
370
1 s t
D e p t
2 0 0 8 ] ; Lammers L a m m e r s , 235 AD2d 286 1 s t D e p t 1 9 9 7 ] G i v e n t h e
n u m e r o u s
f r i v o l o u s
m o t i o n s d e f e n d a n t
has made, t was
a
p r o p e r e x e r c i s e o f d i s c r e t i o n f o r t h e c o u r t t o
e n j o i n h e r f r o m m a k i n g a n y
u r t h e r m o t i o n
i n t h i s a c t i o n w i t h o u t
j u d i c i a l
a p p r o v a l ] ; S c h w a r t z
v
N o r d s t r o m , n c . , 160 AD2d 2 4 0 , 2 4 2 , a p p e a l
d i s m i s s e d
76
NY2d
845 imO], v
d e n i e d
76
NY2d
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
17/30
I n
denying the h e r e i n m o t i o n i n
i t s
e n t i r e t y , ,
t h e
Court a l s o f i n d s
t
a p p r o p r i a t e t o impose
s a n c t i o n s
i n
the
am o u n t
of
2,500.00
g a i n s t
t h e
p l a i n t i f f ,
p u r s u a n t
t o
NYCRR
3 0 - 1 . 1 ,
o r
b r i n g i n g a
r i v o l o u s a n d d u p l i c a t i v e m o t i o n , brought
p r i m a r i l y
t o
harass
an d
waste
Court
r e s o u r c e s ,
w i t h o u t
p r i o r
c o u r t a p p r o v a l . F i n a l l y ,
t h e
V e r i f i e d
C o m p l a i n t i s
d i s m i s s e d f o r
p l a i n t i f f s f a i l u r e t o appear t
t h e
c a l l o f t h e c a l e n d a r f o r a mandatory Compliance
Conference
on F e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 1 4 , p u r s u a n t t o
2 2
NYCRR 0 2 . 2 7 ( b ) . T h i s C o u r t has
p r e v i o u s l y r u l e d
t h a t
p l a i n t i f f
c a n n o t
use h i s
m e d i c a l
c o n d i t i o n , w h i c h p l a i n t i f f has a i l e d t o s u b s t a n t i a t e
t h r o u g h v a l i d
and
a d m i s s i b l e d o c u m e n t a t i o n , as a b a s i s f o r a l l i n g t o appear n
C o u r t
or o f o l l o w t h i s C o u r t ' s
O r d e r s .
CONCLUSION
A c c o r d i n g l y
t I s ,
ORDERED h a t p l a i n t i f f James C o u r t ' s m o t i o n b r o u g h t p u r s u a n t t o CPLR 3 1 2 6 , o r an
O r d e r t r i k i n g
t h e d e f e n d a n t s '
a n s w e r
a n d
a f f i r m a t i v e
d e f e n s e s a n d s e t t i n g
t h i s
m a t t e r
d own
o r
an
i n q u e s t
as
o
damages o n t h e b a s i s
o f d e f e n d a n t s '
r e f u s a l
t o
c o m p l y w i t h d i s c o v e r y
demands
e r v e d
i n
2 0 0 9 ,
o r d e r i n g
d e f e n d a n t s
t o
p r o d u c e
d o c u m e n t s
and
p r o d u c e d e f e n d a n t
J o h n S i e b e r t . f o r a e p o s i t i o n , and o r d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n o f d e f e n d a n t s ' c o u n s e l
J o s e p h
M.
u r k e ,
Esq. s d e n i e d i n
i t s
e n t i r e t y ; a n d
t
i s f u r t h e r ,
ORDERED h a t t h e V e r i f i e d
C o m p l a i n t
s d i s m i s s e d
f o r
p l a i n t i f f s f a i l u r e
t o
a p p e a r
a t
t h e
c a l l o f t h e c a l e n d a r
f o r
a m a n d a t o r y
C o m p l i a n c e
C o n f e r e n c e on F e b r u a r y
2 6 ,
2 0 1 4 , p u r s u a n t t o
NYCRR
0 2 . 2 7 ( b ) ; a n d t i s f u r t h e r ,
ORDERED h a t t h e C o u r t
sua p o n t e
imposes a n c t i o n s a g a i n s t
p l a i n t i f f
i n t h e
amount
o f
2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 , p u r s u a n t t o
2 2
NYCRR 3 0 - 1 . 1 , o r i l i n g a u c c e s s i v e r i v o l o u s
m o t i o n I n v i o l a t i o n
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
18/30
C o u r t o r t r a n s m i t t a l t o
t h e
C o m m i s s i o n e r o f
T a x a t i o n
a n d
F i n a n c e ;
a n d t i s f u r t h e r ,
ORDERED h a t
t h e
O r d e r s o f u s t i c e
H a r o l d
B e e l e r ,
a n d
t h e O r d e r o f h i s C o u r t
d a t e d
D e c e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 1 3
r e
t l l i n
p l a c e
a n d a r e
r e i s s u e d ,
a n d t h e h e r e i n p a r t i e s a r e e n j o i n e d f r o m
t a k i n g a n y
u r t h e r a c t i o n
i n t h i s m a t t e r
i n c l u d i n g ,
i l i n g a n y m o t i o n s , o r i l i n g a n y
n e w
c t i o n s
b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t ,
w i t h o u t
p r i o r l e a v e o f
h e
A d m i n i s t r a t i v e J u s t i c e
o f
t h i s C o u r t ; a n d t i s
f u r t h e r .
ORDERED
h a t
p l i n t i f f
i s
c o n t i n u e d t o
b e
d e e m e d
a
v e x a t i o u s
l i t i g t o r
a n d
i s
e n j o i n e d
f r o m ; 1 )
s s e r t i n g
h i s
m e d i c a l o r p h y s i c a l c o n d i t i o n , o r m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t t h e r e o f , o r 2 )
a s s e r t i n g h i s
u n a v a i l a b i l i t y
b e i n g o u t o f t a t e a s
a
e a s o n o r n o n - a p p e a r a n c e o r n o n -
p a r t i c i p a t i o n I n c o u r t p r o c e d u r e b e f o r e t h i s
C o u r t o r
S p e c i a l
R e f e r e e
o r a n y C o u r t - a p p o i n t e e ;
and t i s
f u r t h e r ,
ORDERED
h a t
t h e
p a r t i e s
a i l u r e
t o
c o m p l y w i t h t h e
t e r m s
o f
t h i s
o r d e r s h a l l
s u b j e c t
t h e p a r t i e s t o
d i s m i s s a l
o f h e i r a c t i o n , a n c t i o n s o r c o n t e m p t
o f
t h e C o u r t ;
a n d
t i s f u r t h e r ,
ORDERED h a t
t h e
C l e r k o f t h e
C o u r t
a n d t h e C o u n t y C l e r k o f N e w Y o r k C o u n t y a r e
o r d e r e d n o t t o a c c e p t
a n y
u r t h e r
p a p e r s
i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h
t h i s
m a t t e r , n c l u d i n g a n y
m o t i o n s ,
n o r
s
p l i n t i f f
a l l o w e d t o
c o m m e n c e
a n y
n e w
a c t i o n s
w i t h o u t
p r i o r
l e a v e
o f
t h e
A d m i n i s t r a t i v e
J u s t i c e
o f t h i s C o u r t ; and
t
i s
f u r t h e r ,
ORDERED h a t
t h e d e f e n d a n t s s h a l l
s e r v e a c o p y o f
h i s
O r d e r
w i t h
N o t i c e o f E n t r y o n
t h e
p l i n t i f f a n d t h e C l e r k o f t h e
C o u r t
w h o s d i r a c t f t H t n
j i i r f f | m o n f
a c c o r d i n g l y .
T h i s c o n s t i t i ^ J ^ ^ ^ ^ p 6 l | ^ o | h e o u r t
i JAN 7
aM
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
19/30
\ \ j a SUPREME COURT
OF
THE STATE OF
NEW
ORK
) NEW YORK
COUNTY
Ui
CO
>
e
s
s
lU
u.
Il l
K
IS
i i
O
z
S 2 I
U J
j
o
u.
S I
P R E S E N T :
P a u l
Wooten
PART
Ir
Justle9
I n d e x Number: 0 1 0 3 3 / 2 0 1 5
COURI JAMES
vs
burke.
OSEPH M.
SEQUENCE NUMBER:
02
SUMMARY UDGMENT
l i l S T i b N 8 g Q . N 0 . .
NVC
OFRCE
Y g U P R i M E , C O U R T
-
p i i
T h e o l l o w i n g p a p e r s ,
n u m b e r e d
1 o4
e r e r e
a d o n h i s m o t i o n t o / f o r
| N o ( s ) . _ L 3 l ^
| N q ( ) . 3
Notice o f Motion/Order o ShowCause~fRdavHs
xhibits
Answering f f i d a v i t s
x h i b i t s
Replying f f i d a v i t s
U p o n
t h e o
r a
g o i n g
p a p e r s ,
t
I s
o r d e r e d t h a t
h i s
m o t i o n
s
d i C \ d i O ^
VH
3 C O O ( i S ^ S P C &
UOcV^
' ^ m S T f i o f t a i n d u i i r i d e e i i s ^
\ a
V o o W i
S e c i M e w i f l
oo\.
FILED
JAN27 I I
-
7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf
20/30
SUPREME COURT OF
THE
STATE
OFNEWYORK
EWYORK
COUNTY
PRESENT: HON,
PAULWOOTEN
RT
Justice
JAMES
COURi,
- against
-
P l a i n t i f r
n
1033rt8
NDEX NO.^ ..nrs
JOSEPHM. URKE
SQ.,
RUSSO URKE
ESQ.,JOHNDOE -10
Defsndants.
The o l l o w i n g
p a p e r s
numbered 1 o 2 were e a d on
h i s
m o t i o n by e f e n d a n t s t o d i s m l s e t h e
complaint.
PAPERS NUMBERED
N o t i c e of o t i o n /
Order
o
S h o w CauseAffidavits
. E x h i b i t s
Answering
A f f i d a v i t s
x h i b i t s Mem