2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

download 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

of 30

Transcript of 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    1/30

    5 \

    ) >

    SUPREMECOURT

    OF

    THE TATEOFNEW

    YORK

    EWYORKCOUNTY

    PRESENT:

    HON.PAULWQOTEN PART

    Justice

    JAMES OURI,

    P l a l n t f f f ,

    I N D E X NO. 107240/04

    - a gainst

    -

    MOTION

    8EQ.

    O .

    OOP

    JOHN

    SIEBERT

    nd

    JOHN

    W IEBERT,

    D. C. ,

    Defendants.

    The ol l o w i n g p a p e r s , numbered 1 to 4 , ere r e a d o n h i s motion by

    the

    l a i n t i f f to

    v a c a t e a

    p r i o r

    O rder o f h i s Court ^

    PAPERSNUMBERED

    Notice

    o f

    Motion/ O rder to Show auseAffidavits xhibits

    A n s w e r i n g

    A f f i d a v i t s

    x h i b i t s

    E

    P

    Replying

    A f f i d a v i t s

    (Reply Memo _L

    U V J A M 2 O t t

    Cross-Motion:

    Yes

    LFNo

    OOWnYOSSSf^

    B e f o r e t h e

    C o u r t

    s a m o t i o f p b i ^ h e ^

    Recommendation o f J u d i c i a l H e a r i n g

    O f f i c e r

    I r a Gammerman (JHO Gammermmi) a t e d

    December 15,2014 and e n t e r e d

    on F e b r u a r y

    10,2015. A l s o b e f o r e

    t h e

    C o u r t I s a c r o s s -

    m o t i o n

    by h e

    p l a i n t i f f , d a t e d A p r i l

    6,2015,

    o r e j e c t

    t h e R e p o r t

    o f JHO Gammerman

    c l a i m i n g

    P e r j u r y , F r a u d on h e C o u r t a n d f o r g i n g and p l a n t i n g o f F i l e s I n

    M o t i o n Sequence

    7

    y

    J o s e p h

    B u r k e , o r an Order (1) e j e c t i n g

    e n t i r e l y

    t h e i l l e g a l and r a u d u l e n t I n q u e s t

    O r d e r

    g r o u n d e d

    o n F r a u d , p e r j u r y a n d f r a u d u l e n t B u r k e 4 - 1 - 1 5 M o t i o n I n v i o l a t i o n o f B e e l e r i n j u n c t i o n

    m a n d a t i n g

    ' p e r m i s s i o n ' and

    i o l a t i o n s

    o f mandates f I n q u e s t s s i c ] ,

    c o n d u c t e d

    by

    d e f a u l t

    due

    t o

    m y l l n e s s . (2)

    a c a t i n g

    t h e

    D e c i s i o n

    o f

    1 2 - 2 4 - 1 3 ,

    on h e a d d i t i o n a l

    g r o u n d s

    o f

    r a u d

    on h e

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    2/30

    C r o s s - M o t i o n ) .

    The defendant

    i l e d e p l y

    a f f i d a v i t

    on p r i l

    8,2015.

    BACKGROUND

    By an r d e r d a t e d December 4,2013 nd i l e d on December 6,2013, i s C o u r t .

    d i r e c t e d t h e d e f e n d a n t s

    t o

    i l e t h e Note

    f I s s u e

    on

    r

    b e f o r e J a n u a r y

    28,2014,

    nd

    upon

    h a t

    f i l i n g t h e C o u r t s t a t e d

    t h a t

    t h e C l e r k s h a l l s e t a a t e upon h i c h an n q u e s t i l l be e l d

    a s s e s s i n g damages, f

    a n y ,

    g a i n s t

    l a i n t i f f

    on

    e f e n d a n t s

    o u n t e r c l a i m s ,

    h e o n l y r e m a i n i n g

    issue n

    t h i s

    case.^

    The

    o u r t ,

    l s o i n

    t h e

    December 4,2013 rder 1) r a n t e d d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o

    s t r i k e

    a n d d i s m i s s l a i n t i f T s r e p l y t o d e f e n d a n t s o u n t e r c l a i m s ; 2 )

    deemed

    l a i n t i f f a e x a t i o u s

    l i t i g a t o r

    a n d

    e n j o i n e d

    p l a i n t i f f

    f r o m :

    a )

    s s e r t i n g

    h i s

    m e d i c a l o r

    p h y s i c a l

    o n d i t i o n ,

    o r m e d i c a l

    t r e a t m e n t t h e r e o f ,

    o r

    b) s s e r t i n g h i s u n a v a i l a b i l i t y b e i n g o u t o f s t a t e as a e a s o n f o r n o n -

    a p p e a r a n c e o r o n - p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n c o u r t

    p r o c e d u r e

    b e f o r e h i s C o u r t o r S p e c i a l R e f e r e e o r a n y

    C o u r t - a p p o i n t e e ,

    n d

    c )

    e - i s s u e d t h e O r d e r s

    b y J u s t i c e H a r o l d B e e l e r ,

    a t e d F e b r u a r y 1 7 ,

    2005,

    nd

    h i s

    o r d e r

    d a t e d

    December

    2 , 2 0 0 5 , n w h i c h a l l

    p a r t i e s were n j o i n e d

    f r o m t a k i n g

    a n y

    u r t h e r a c t i o n

    I n t h i s m a t t e r n c l u d i n g , f i l i n g a n y m o t i o n s ,

    w i t h o u t r i o r l e a v e o f

    h i s C o u r t .

    The l a i n t i f f a p p e a l e d t h e December 4,2013 e c i s i o n . S u b s e q u e n t l y , h i s

    C o u r t

    e n i e d

    p l a i n t i f f s r e q u e s t o r l e a v e t o

    i l e

    a o t i o n t o r e a r g u e h i s C o u r t

    O r d e r

    d a t e d D e c e m b e r 2 4 ,

    2013 h i c h

    r e s o l v e d M o t i o n S e q u e n c e 067 s e e

    h i s

    C o u r t s n t e r i m O r d e r ,

    a t e d

    J a n u a r y

    1 7 ,

    201 4 n d i l e d

    on Janua ry 22,2014).

    O n e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 1 4 , h e C o u r t h e l d a a n d a t o ry C om p l i a n c e C o n f e r e n c e n P a r t 7 ,

    C o u r t r o o m 341,60 e n t r e S t r e e t , N e w o r k

    o r

    h i s case and h e d u p l i c a t e case

    o u r i

    v

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    3/30

    conference the l a i n t i f f pro se,

    c h o s e n o t t o

    appear,

    i t h o u t

    good

    c a u se o r

    h i s n o n-

    appearance,

    a n d

    c h o s e

    not o s end a n a t t o r n e y

    o n h i s b e h a l f .

    The defendants

    appeared

    a t

    the

    c o n f e r e n c e and t h e

    C o u r t

    p r o c e e d e d

    t o

    c o n f e r e n c e t h e

    c a s e s .

    On e b r u a r y

    27,2014,

    h i s

    C o u r t

    r e c e i v e d a n i n c o m p l e t e

    d r a f t

    copy o f a U n i t e d S t a t e s B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t i l i n g by

    a c s i m i l e

    from

    t h e p l a i n t i f f

    w i t h o u t v a l i d p r o o f

    o f

    sendee o

    t h e

    d e f e n d a n t s ,

    w h i c h v i o i a t e s t h i s

    C o u r t s

    R u l e s . N o n e t h e l e s s ,

    g i v e n

    t h e s e r i o u s n e s s o f

    s u c h

    a

    i l i n g

    t h i s

    C o u r t

    c o n t a c t e d

    t h e

    U n i t e d

    S t a t e s B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t and

    d i s c o v e r e d

    t h a t

    o n

    F r i d a y ,

    F e b r u a r y

    28,2014, l a i n t i f f f i l e d a

    C h a p t e r7 a n k r u p t c y P e t i t i o n

    i n The

    U n i t e d S t a t e s B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t , C e n t r a l i s t r i c t o f

    C a i i f o m i a , R i v e r s i d e D i v i s i o n ,

    s e e k i n g t o

    d i s c h a r g e

    t h e

    d e b t n t h i s c a s e . The B a n k r u p t c y

    P e t i t i o n

    f i l i n g

    a u t o m a t i c a l l y

    s t a y e d

    h i s

    S t a t e

    C o u r t

    p r o c e e d i n g ,

    p u r s u a n t

    t o

    11

    U . S . C .

    62

    {s ee C a s e

    No. :14-bk-12555-WJ).

    On

    u l y . 1 5 , 2 0 1 4 , t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s

    B a n k r u p t c y

    C o u r t n C a i i f o m i a g r a n t e d t h e

    d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o v a c a t e

    t h e

    a u t o m a t i c

    s t a y ,

    p u r s u a n t t o 11

    U . S . C .

    62. On u l y

    24,

    2 0 1 4 , h e p l a i n t i f f t h e n i l e d

    a

    N o t i c e

    o f

    R e m o v a l o r r e m o v a l

    o f

    t h e h e r e i n

    c a s e 2004 Case)

    Case

    N o . : 1 4 - b k - 1 2 5 5 5 - W J , d v . r o c e e d i n g 6 : 1 4 - a p - 0 1 1 9 2 - W J ) n d

    t h e 2008 Case Case

    No. : 1 4 - b k - 12555-WJ, d v . P r o ce e d in g 6 : 1 4 - a p - 0 1 1 9 0 - W J ) . T h i s

    C o u r t

    r e c e i v e d C o p i e s

    o f

    t h e N o t i c e s t o

    Rem ove

    on

    u l y

    2 9 , 2 0 1 4 , w h i c h s t a y e d t h i s C o u r t r o m p r o c e e d i n g .

    On A u g u s t 1 , 2 0 1 4 , h e H o n o r a b l e

    Way ne

    o h n s o n , U n i t e d

    S t a t e s

    B a n k r u p t c y C o u r t

    J u d g e ,

    h e l d

    a

    h e a r i n g on

    t h e

    p l a i n t i f f s

    a p p l i c a t i o n

    i n c l u d i n g

    t h e

    d e f e n d a n t s

    o p p o s i t i o n ,

    and

    g r a n t e d

    t h e

    d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n

    t o remand b o t h C o u r i

    a s e s b a c k

    t o

    t h e

    New

    Y o r k S t a t e

    Supreme

    o u r t . - r On

    e p t e m t ) e r

    2 , 2 0 1 4 , u d g e J o h n s o n a l s o

    d i s m i s s e d

    t h e p l a i n t i f f s

    C h a p t e r

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    4/30

    a c t i o n s(Case No. :14-bk-12555-WJ,

    roceeding

    6;14-ap-01192-WJ and Adv. roceeding

    6:14-ap-01190-WJ).

    S u b s e q u e n t l y , on December 5,2014,JHO

    Gammerman

    e l d an n q u e s t ,

    and

    s s u e d

    h i s

    r e p o r t

    on h e

    r e c o r d

    on

    h a t

    d a y .

    At

    h e i n q u e s t

    t h e d e f e n d a n t s '

    o u n s e l appeared

    n - p e r s o n

    and

    h e l a i n t i f f ,

    pro e , appeared by e l e p h o n e . The

    r a n s c r i p t r e f l e c t s t h a t

    a t some

    o i n t

    n e a r

    t h e

    b e g i n n i n g

    o f t h e

    i n q u e s t ,

    l a i n t i f f

    hung

    u p h e

    t e l e p h o n e and

    e f u s e d t o

    p a r t i c i p a t e i n

    t h e

    i n q u e s t , c l a i m i n g t h e a c t i o n s

    o f JHO Gammerman e r e

    f r a u d u l e n t

    a n d

    t h a t

    he a c k e d n o t i c e .

    H o w e v e r ,

    as

    l a i n t i f f

    h a d

    i l e d an

    p p e a l

    o f t h e December 4,2013 r d e r w h i c h s e t

    h i s

    m a t t e r

    down o r an n q u e s t ,

    a n d h a v i n g

    a l s o

    r e q u e s t e d l e a v e t o

    r e a r g u e t h e December 4,2013

    O r d e r ,

    t

    i s

    e v i d e n t t h a t l a i n t i f f was w a r e t h a t t h e i n q u e s t was e n d i n g ( s e e

    C o u r t

    n t e r i m

    o r d e r

    d a t e d J a n u a r y 1 7 , 2 0 1 4

    a n d

    e n t e r e d o n

    J a n u a r y 2 4 , 2 0 14 ) . M o r e o v e r , h e r a n s c r i p t f r o m

    t h e i n q u e s t n d i c a t e s t h a t JHO

    Gammerman

    r i e d t o

    n q u i r e a s t o

    w h e t h e r

    l a i n t i f f

    h a d

    s o u g h t

    a n a d j o u r n m e n t o r s t a y o f t h e i n q u e s t

    a n d

    a l s o f f e r e d p l a i n t i f f a n a d j o u r n m e n t , b u t

    s u c h

    I n q u i r y

    was

    g n o r e d o r r e f u s e d ( s e e

    D e c e m b e r

    1 5 , 2 0 1 4

    r a n s c r i p t

    p .

    3 ,

    i n e 12 n d p . 5 , i n e 3 . T h u s ,

    on

    December 5 , 2 0 1 4 ,

    f t e r t a k i n g

    d e f e n d a n t s ' w o r n t e s t i m o n y , JHO

    ammerman

    recommended o h i s

    C o u r t

    J u d g m e n t

    n

    f a v o r o f h e d e f e n d a n t s '

    on

    h e i r c o u n t e r c l a i m s

    n t h e

    amount f 7 , 1 1 0 , 5 3 2 . 00 , i t h i n t e r e s t

    r o m

    A u g u s t 18,2003 see

    December

    15,2014

    T r a n s c r i p t

    p , 1 6 , l i n e 7,

    o p .

    1 7 i n e

    1 6 ) .

    T h e r e a f t e r ,

    n

    an

    n t e r i m

    O r d e r

    d a t e d and

    n t e r e d

    on a n u a r y

    8,2015,

    h i s

    C o u r t

    g r a n t e d t h e

    p a r t i e s

    l e a v e t o i l e

    a

    o t i o n

    t o c o nf i r m

    o r e j e c t JHO Gammerman s

    e p o r t . On

    F e b r u a r y 1 0 , 2 0 1 5 , JHO

    Gammerman

    o - O r d e r e d t h e r a n s c r i p t o f t h e i n q u e s t p r o c e e d i n g a n d

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    5/30

    t h e

    amended e r i f i e d c o m p l a i n t , d e f e n d a n t s ' amended answer

    i t h

    c o u n t e r c l a i m s ,

    a

    copy

    f h e

    A p p e l l a t e D i v i s i o n ,

    i r s t

    D e p a r t m e n t d e c i s i o n i n C o u r i v i e b e r t , 48

    AD3d

    370 1 s t Dept 0 0 8 ] , a

    copy f h i s C o u r t ' s O r d e r December 24,2013,

    and

    a

    copy f h e

    N o t e

    o f I s s u e ,

    i l e d

    o n

    J a n u a r y

    27,2014.

    The l a i n t i f f f i l e s a

    r o s s - m o t i o n

    b y t h e p l a i n t i f f , d a t e d A p r i l

    6,2015,

    o

    r e j e c t

    t h e

    R e p o r t o f JHO Gammerman

    l a i m i n g

    P e r j u r y , F r a u d on h e C o u r t and

    o r g i n g

    and

    p l a n t i n g

    o f

    R I e s

    n

    M o t i o n

    Sequence

    7

    y J o s e p h

    B u r k e ,

    o r

    an Order

    1)

    e j e c t i n g

    e n t i r e l y

    t h e l l e g a l and r a u d u l e n t I n q u e s t

    O r d e r g r o u n d e d

    on

    F r a u d ,

    p e r j u r y and r a u d u l e n t B u r k e 4 - 1 -

    15 o t i o n i n

    v i o l a t i o n

    o f B e e l e r n j u n c t i o n m a n d a t i n g ' p e r m i s s i o n ' n d v i o l a t i o n s o f m a n d a t e s o f

    I n q u e s t s

    s i c ] , c o n d u c t e d b y

    d e f a u l t

    due o

    m y

    l l n e s s .

    ( 2 )

    a c a t i n g t h e D e c i s i o n o f 1 2 - 2 4 - 1 3 , o n

    t h e

    d d ' r t i o n a l

    g r o u n d s

    o f

    r a u d

    on

    h e

    C o u r t , e r j u r e d

    o r d e r ,

    o l l u s i o n

    a n d

    g h o s t w r i t i n g

    b y

    B u r k e

    o f

    a n i l l e g a l l y s i c ] D e c i s i o n b e l i e d b y e v i d e n c e . 3 ) i s q u a l i f i c a t t o n o f

    J o s e p h

    M. u r k e

    E s q .

    B u r k e ] on

    h e

    g r o u n d s o f r a u d , p e r j u r y

    and h a t he i l l

    be a l l e d as

    a

    i t n e s s t e s t i m o n y

    [ s i c ]

    d e t r i m e n t a l

    t o S l e b e r f P l a i n t i f f N o t i c e o f C r o s s - M o t i o n ) . The e f e n d a n t

    i l e d

    a

    e p l y

    a f f i d a v i t .

    IS USSION

    I t i s

    w e l l , s e t t l e d

    t h a t

    t h e r e p o r t

    o f

    a p e c i a l

    R e f e r e e h a l l b e c o n f i r m e d

    w h e n e v e r

    t h e

    f i

    n d i n g s c o n t a i n e d t h e r e i n a r e s u p p o r t e d b y

    t h e

    r e c o r d

    and h e

    S p e c i a l R e f e r e e has l e a r l y

    d e f i n e d t h e i s s u e s and

    r e s o l v e d

    m a t t e r s o f r e d i b i l i t y

    { S t e i n g a r t

    v H o f f m a n ,

    80

    AD3d 444,445

    [ 1 s t

    D e p t

    2 0 1 1 ] ,

    i t i n g

    Nagerv

    a n a d i s ,

    238

    AD2d

    3 5 , 1 3 5 - 1 3 6

    1 s t

    D e p t

    1 9 9 7 ] ;

    see

    l s o

    M e l n i t z k y v U r i b e , 33

    AD3d

    373

    1 s t D e p t 2 0 0 6 ] ;

    K a p l a n v B i n y , 209 AD2d 248 1 s t D e p t 1 9 9 4 ] ;

    N a m e r v l 5 2 - 5 ^ 5 6 W .

    5 t h S t R e a A y

    o / p . , 1 0 8 A D 2 d 7 0 5

    1 s t D e p t

    1 9 8 5 ] v

    d i s m i s s e d s u b

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    6/30

    he h o r o u g h l y r f v i e w e d the

    i l e s ,

    was a m i l i a r w i t h t h e case, heard the l a i n t i f f s

    o p p o s i t i o n

    t o

    t h e i n q u e s t , the

    e s t i m o n y

    o f

    w i t n e s s e s

    t h a t

    were u b j e c t t o

    any r o s s

    e x a m i n a t i o n by h e

    p l a i n t i f f had he

    not

    hung up, and h i s f i n d i n g s are u p p o r t e d

    by

    the h e a r i n g t r a n s c r i p t , w a r r a n t i n g

    c o n f i r m a t i o n (see

    Adelaide

    r o d s . , I n c . v

    BKN

    n t l . AG 1 AD3d

    598

    1 s t Dept 2008] lhe

    S p e c i a l Referee l e a r l y d e f i n e d the s s u e s and r e s o l v e d m a t t e r s o f r e d i b i l i t y , and

    had

    ample

    s u p p o r t

    of ho se

    i n d i n g s i n t h e r e c o r d

    and h i s

    r e p o r t w a r r a n t e d

    c o n f i r m a n c e ] ;

    see

    l s o

    Nager v

    P a n a d l s ,

    51 AD3d

    598

    1 s t Dept 9 9 8 ] ) .

    Based

    upon

    h e f o r e g o i n g , d e f e n d a n t s ' m o t i o n

    t o

    c o n f i r m

    t h e Report and Recommendation of

    JHO ammerman s g r a n t e d and l a i n t i f r s

    c r o s s -

    m o t i o n t o

    r e j e c t t h e R e f e r e e ' s R e p o r t s d e n i e d

    ( s e e

    M a k e r

    o f

    m y t h e v G o o r d , 1 A D 3 d 6 0 8

    [2d

    Dept 2007]

    T h e r e

    i s

    no

    v i d e n c e

    i n

    t h e r e c o r d t o s u p p o r t t h e

    p l a i n t i f q ' s

    c o n t e n t i o n t h a t

    t h e

    h e a r i n g o f f i c e r

    was

    biased... nd h e r e

    i s

    no

    n d i c a t i o n t h a t t h e outcome f t h e

    h e a r i n g was

    a f f e c t e d

    by

    any

    l l e g e d b i a s o n h e p a r t o f t h e

    h e a r i n g

    o f f i c e r ] ) .

    S p e c i f i c a l l y , t h e p o r t i o n o f l a i n t i f f s

    c r o s s - m o t i o n s e e k i n g

    t o r e j e c t

    JHO

    Gammerman s

    R e p o r t and Recommendatio n as

    l l e g a l

    and

    b a s e d

    o n r a u d

    and

    e r j u r y b y d e f e n d a n t ' s a t t o r n e y

    Burke and n v i o l a t i o n o f J u s t i c e B e e l e r ' s Order

    a n d a t i n g

    t h e p a r t i e s

    secure

    p e r m i s s i o n '

    b e f o r e i l i n g , i s

    d e n i e d .

    The

    e c o r d does o t u p p o r t any

    r a u d

    o r

    p e r j u r y b y

    d e f e n d a n t s o r t h e i r

    a t t o r n e y B u r k e . T h i s C o u r t a l s o g r a n t e d l e a v e f o r t h e

    p a r t i e s

    t o

    i l e a p p l i c a t i o n s

    t o c o n f i r m

    o r

    r e j e c t JHO Gammer man s

    e p o r t ,

    t h u s c o m p l y i n g w i t h J u s t i c e

    H a r o l d

    B e e l e r ' s

    O r d e r and

    h i s

    C o u r t ' s

    Order

    dated

    December 24,2013.

    The o r t i o n o f l a i n t i f f s c r o s s - m o t i o n t o v a c a t e h i s

    C o u r t ' s o r d e r ,

    d a t e d December 4 ,

    2013,

    i x t e e n months

    f t e r t h e

    i n i t i a l d e c i s i o n

    i s d e n i e d . P l a i n t i f f

    makes

    h i s

    a p p l i c a t i o n a f t e r

    he

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    7/30

    v i o l a t i n g the

    C o u r t ' s p r e v i o u s Order and

    w i t h o u t l e a v e

    o f

    the

    C o u r t .

    Moreover, he Court

    a d d i t i o n a l l y f i n d s t h a t

    the

    h e r e i n a p p l i c a t i o n i s i n d i c a t i v e of a p a t t e r n by h e p l a i n t i f f t o

    c o n t i n u a l i y

    f i l e

    m u i t i p l e motions o

    vacate

    or reargue e c i s i o n s , w i t h o u t s u f f i c i e n t

    s u p p o r t ,

    h a t

    h a v e

    been a d v e r s e l y r u l e d

    a g a i n s t

    him.

    R e g a r d i n g t j i e p l i n t i f f s c r o s s - m o t i o n t o d i s q u l i f y J o s e p h B u r k e , d e f e n d a n t s o u n s e i ,

    i s

    w e l i

    s e t t l e d

    t h a t

    [ Q h e

    d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n

    o f

    an

    a t t o r n e y

    i s

    a

    m a t t e r t h a t r e s t s

    w i t h i n

    t h e

    sound

    d i s c r e t i o n

    o f t h e coyrf

    F l o r e s

    v W i l l a r c J J .

    P r i c e

    A s s o c s . ,

    LLC,20

    AD3d 343,344

    1 s t

    Dept

    2 0 0 5 ] ; s e e W e l l s Fargo

    Bank, . A . v

    C a m ,82

    AD3d 880,881

    2 d

    Dept

    0 1 1 ] ;

    F a l k

    v

    G a l l o , 73

    AD3d

    6 8 5 , 685

    2 d

    D e p t 2 0 1 0 ] ; H a r r i s

    v

    S c u i c o , 86 AD3d 4 8 1 , 4 8 1 [ 1 s t D e p t 2 0 0 9 ] ) . The i g h t

    t o

    c o u n s e i i s n o t

    a b s o l u t e and m a y be v e r r i d d e n

    where n e c e s s a r y .

    ..

    u t

    t

    i s a a l u e d r i g h t

    a n d a n y r e s t r i c t i o n

    m u s t

    b e

    a r e f u l l y s c r u t i n i z e d

    {S&S

    o t e l V e n t u r e s t d . P a r t n e r s h i p v tn

    S . H . C o r p . ,

    69

    NY2d 437,443 1 9 8 7 ] ; see MaUerofAbrams

    J o h n

    A n o n y m o u s ] ,62

    NY2d 1 8 3 ,

    1 9 6

    1 9 8 4 ] ) .

    A p a r ^ s n t i t l e m e n t t o b e r e p r e s e n t e d

    i n

    o n g o i n g i t i g t i o n b y c o u n s e l o f h i s o r

    h e r

    o w n h o o s i n g . :. h o u l d n o t

    be

    b r i d g e d a b s e n t a l e a r s h o w i n g

    t h a t

    i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n i s

    w a r r a n t e d '

    G u l i n o y

    G u l i n o ,

    35

    AD3d

    8 1 2 , 8 1 2 2 d

    D e p t

    2 0 0 6 ] ;

    s e e

    S S

    o t e l

    V e n t u r e s t d .

    P a r t n e r s h i p ,

    69

    NY2d

    a t 4 4 3 ; M a t t e r o f b r a m s , 82 NY2d a t 1 9 6 ; Campotongo v C a m p o l o n g o ,

    2

    D3d

    476,476 2 d

    D e p t

    2 0 0 3 ] ;

    Domlnguez Community e a l t h

    P l a n

    o f

    u f f o l k , 284 AD2d

    2 9 4 , 2 9 4 , 2 d D e p t 2 0 01 ] ) . A c c o r d i n g l y , m o t i o n s t o d i s q u a l i f y

    o p p o s i n g c o u n s e l a r e

    d i s f a v o r e d

    .

    ..

    and

    r e q u i r e

    a

    h i g h

    s t a n d a r d o f

    p r o o f

    { C i a o - D I R e s t .

    C o r p . v P a x t o n 3 5 0 ,

    LLC,

    22

    i s c

    3d

    1 1 1 7 [ A ] ,

    a t

    *2 Sup

    C t , N Y

    C o u n t y 2 0 0 8 ] ; s e e

    o l d s m i t h

    v E l e n b e r g , 2013WL

    1 4 2 2 6 4 ,

    B ,

    2013 N Y M i s c

    LEXIS 1 9 9 7 ,

    1 7

    [Sup C t ,

    N Y

    C o u n t y

    2 0 1 3 ] ; see

    l s o N o r t h w e s t e r n

    N a t l .

    I n s . C o .

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    8/30

    3 . 7 of h e Rules of r o f e s s i o n a l

    Conduct

    22 NYCRR 2 0 0 . 0 ) H a r r i s ,

    86 AD3d a t 481[The

    d e c i s i o n whether

    d d i s q u a l i f y an

    a t t o r n e y r e s t s

    i n

    t h e

    sound

    d i s c r e t i o n of h e cou r f ; s e e

    S S

    H o t e l V e n t u r e s L t d

    P a r t n e r s h l p ,

    69

    Y2d

    a t 443;

    a l k ,

    73 D3d a t 6 8 6 ) . C o u r t s

    must

    o n s i d e r

    t h e

    o t a l i t y o f

    t h e

    c i r c u m s t a n c e s F e r o l l t o v V u H a g g l o , 99 AD3d 19,27

    1 s t

    Dept

    0 1 2 ] ,

    u o t i n g

    A b s e l e t v a t r a R e a l t y ,

    LLC,85

    AD3d

    1406,1407

    3d Dept

    0 1 1 ) ; s e e

    Pamesy a m e s ,80

    AD3d

    948,952

    3d

    Dept

    201

    j ) ,

    and

    must

    a k e c a r e t o

    a v o i d

    m e c h a n i c a l

    a p p l i c a t i o n

    o f

    b l a n k e t

    r u l e s ' P e l l e g r i n o v Oppenheimer

    o . , n c . ,49

    D3d 94,98 1 s t Dept 0 0 8 ] , u o t i n g Teknh

    P l e x , n c . V

    Meynet

    a n d l s ,89

    Y2d

    123,132 1 9 9 6 ] ; s e eS S o t e l V e n t u r e s

    L t d .

    P a r t n e r s h i p , 69 Y2d a t 4 4 4 ) . The u n c t i o n

    of h e

    c o u r t o n such a m o t i o n i s r e s t r i c t e d t o

    t h e

    t a k i n g

    o f

    such

    a c t i o n as

    may be

    n e c e s s a r y

    t o I n s u r e a p r o p e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e p a r t i e s and

    f a i r n e s s

    i n t h e c o n d u c t o f t h e

    i t i g a t i o n {Young v

    Oa k

    C r e s t

    a i k ,

    n c . , 75 AD2d 956,957 3d

    Dept

    1 9 8 0 ] ; s e e

    Booth v

    C o n t i n e n t a l

    n s .

    C o . ,

    167 Misc 2d

    429,436 Sup

    C t ,

    Westchester

    C o u n t y

    1 9 9 5 ] ) .

    T h e l a i n t i f f s

    c r o s s - m o t i o n

    t o d i s q u a l i f y d e f e n d a n t s c o u n s e l i s d e n i e d .

    There

    s n o

    c r e d i b l e

    or r a t i o n a l b a s t s i n the C o u rfs e c o r d t o

    support

    s u c h an a p p l i c a t i o n .

    Moreover,

    p l a i n t i f f s c r o s s - m o t i o n t o d i s q u a l i f y B u r k e s a t l e a s t

    t h e

    t e n t h such m o t i o n f o r same,and t h i s

    C o u r t c o n c l u d e ^

    h i t

    i t

    i s

    f r i v o l o u s , t o t a l l y

    w i t h o u t

    m e r i t , a n d u n s u p p o r t e d

    b y

    t h e C o u r t

    e c o r d ,

    and

    s d e s i g n e d t o h a r a s s

    and annoy

    h e d e f e n d a n t

    and h i s a t t o r n e y . Thus,

    h e c r o s s - m o t i o n

    v i o l a t e s

    Rule

    1 3 0 . 1 - 1

    and

    as

    such

    p l a i n t i f f

    i s

    s u b j e c t

    t o

    s a n c t i o n s .

    F i n a l l y , p l a i n t i f f

    has

    been c l a i m i n g

    he

    u f f e r s r o m

    a e r i o u s l l n e s s s i n c e

    t h e i n c e p t i o n

    o f

    t h i s ca se i n c e t w a s i l e d i n 2004. He as

    c ho s e n

    t o

    proceed

    pro se, u t

    c o n t i n u a l l y

    a s s e r t s

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    9/30

    c o n t i n u e s t o

    i l e m u l t i p l e

    m o t i o n s o v e r

    and

    o v e r and o t > o m b a r d t h e

    Court

    i t h ex

    p a r t e

    f a c s i m i l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s , n

    v i o l a t i o n

    o f

    h i s

    C o u r t ' s

    R u l e s .

    The

    o u r t

    once

    g a i n c o n c l u d e s

    f r o m

    t h e

    h e a r i n i g

    e v i d e n c e ,

    n c l u d i n g

    t e l e p h o n e

    c a l l s t o

    t h e

    C o u r t and l a i n t i f f s

    a b u s i v e

    n a t u r e

    towards Court

    e r s o n n e l

    by

    e l e p h o n e ,

    t h a t

    he c o n t i n u e s t o be a

    v e x a t i o u s i t i g a t o r

    and i s

    n e e d l e s s l y

    p r o l o n g i n g

    t h i s a c t i o n

    t o

    harass the

    d e f e n d a n t ,

    h i s a t t o r n e y ,

    and

    n e e d l e s s l y

    exhausts h i s

    C o u r t ' s

    resources i t h motions

    o m p l e t e l y

    devoid

    of e r i t .

    I n

    a d d i t i o n p l a i n t i f f

    has

    been r e p e a t e d l y

    w a m e d

    about

    such

    a c t i o n

    see,

    n t e r l i a

    m o t i o n sequences 047,058, a t e d August 3,2010, o t i o n sequences 055,054,

    a t e d J u l y 6,

    2010, . 3111. o t i o n sequences 060,061,062,063, 065,

    a t e d June

    30,2011, o t i o n

    sequences 042,064, a t e d September

    27,2011,

    n t e r i m

    C o u r t

    o r d e r ,

    d a t e d

    J a n u a r y

    17,2014,

    p . ;

    n t e r i m C o u r t

    O r d e r , d a t e d F e b r u a r y 1 8 , 2 0 1 4 , .3 , m o t i o n sequence

    067, a t e d

    December

    4 , 2 0 1 3 ) . P l a i n t i f f

    w a s

    i v e n ample n o t i c e

    and

    o p p o r t u n i t y

    t o a v o i d s a n c t i o n s and

    an

    n j u n c t i o n see o w l e r

    v

    o n f o r t I , 194

    A D 2 d

    394,598 NY2d 789 1 s t

    Dept 1993]

    l h e

    i m p o s i t i o n

    o f

    t h e maxi m um s a n c t i o n o f $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 o r

    f d v o l o u s

    c o n d u c t w a s p p r o p r i a t e n t h i s

    c i r c u m s t a n c e s i n c e p l a i n t i f f w a s o r e w a r n e d

    a b o u t

    t h e d u b i o u s n a t u r e o f h i s a c t i o n and

    u r t h e r

    b e c a u s e

    t h e

    p l a i n t i f f has e p e a t e d l y engaged n v e x a t i o u s i t i g a t i o n a r i s i n g

    f r o m

    t h e o r i g i n a l .

    . .

    c a s e ] ) .

    CONCLUSION

    A c c o r d i n g l y t

    i s ,

    ORDERED

    h a t

    d e f e n d a n t ' s

    m o t i o n

    p u r s u a n t t o CPLR

    4 0 3

    and

    2 0 2 . 4 4

    o f h e

    U n i f o r m

    R u l e s

    o r

    t h e N e w

    York

    S up re m e o u r t t o

    c o n f i r m

    i n i t s e n t i r e t y t h e R e p o r t and

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    10/30

    f f

    Recommendation

    o f

    JHO r a Gam m erm a n, a t e d F e b r u a r y

    10,2Q15

    s

    d e n i e d i n i t s e n t i r e t y ;

    a n d t i s f u r t h e r ,

    OR ERE h a t defendants are awarded judgmen t on h e i r c o u n t e r c l a i m s a g a i n s t the

    p l a i n t i f f I n t h e

    amount f $ 7 , 1 1 0 , 5 3 2 . 0 0 ,

    w i t h i nt e r e s t f r o r p August 18,2003;

    and

    t

    I s f u r t h e r ,

    OR ERE h a t

    t he

    Orders of u s t i c e Harold Beeler, a n d

    t he Order of

    h i s

    Court dated

    December 12,2005 r e

    t i l l

    i n p l a c e

    and

    r e r e i s s u e d ,

    and

    t h e h e r e i n p a r t i e s a r e e n j o i n e d from

    t a k i n g any u r t h e r

    a c t i o n i n

    t h i s m a t t e r i n c l u d i n g , i l i n g

    any

    m o t i o n s , or

    i l i n g

    any

    n e w

    c t i o n s

    b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t , w i t h o u t p r i o r l e a v e o f

    t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e J u s t i c e

    o f t h i s

    C o u r t ;

    and t

    i s f u r t h e r ,

    OR ERE h a t p l a i n t i f f i s c o n t i n u i d d t o be

    d e e m e d

    a e x a t i o u s i t i g a t o r and i s e n j o i n e d

    f r o m :

    (1)

    s s e r t i n g

    h i s

    m e d i c a l

    or h y s i c a l

    c o n d i t i o n ,

    o r

    m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t

    t h e r e o f , or

    2)

    a s s e r t i n g

    h i s u n a v a i l a b i l i t y b e i n g o u t o f

    s t a t e

    a s a e a s o n f o r non-appearance o r

    non-

    p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n i ^ u r t p r o c e d u r e b e f o r e h i s C o u r t o r S p e c i a l R e f e r e e o r a n y C o u r t - a p p o i n t e e

    t h e r e o f ; a n d t

    i s

    f u r t h e r ,

    OR ERE h a t the C l e r k

    of

    the Court

    and

    the County C l e r k of New ork County

    are

    o r d e r e d n o t

    t o

    a c c e p t any u r t h e r p a p e r s n

    c o n n e c t i o n w i t h

    t h i s

    m a t t e r ,

    n c l u d i n g

    any m o t i o n s ,

    n o r s

    p l a i n t i f f a l l o w e d t o c o m m e n c e any n e w c t i o n s w i t h o u t p r i o r

    l e a v e

    o f t h e A d m i n i s t r a t i v e

    J u s t i c e of

    h i s

    Court; a n d t i s f u r t h e r ,

    OR ERE

    h a t

    t h e d e f e n d a n t s

    s h a l l s e r v e a copy o f t h i s Order i t h N o t i c e o f E n t r y

    on

    the

    l a i n t i f f

    Ja m e s

    o u r i

    and

    the C l e r k of he

    Court

    w h o s

    d i r e c t e d

    t o

    e n t e r

    judgment

    a c c o r d i n g l y .

    T h i s c o n k i t u t e s t h e D e c i s i o n a n d 0 ( d e r f h e ^ o u r t .

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    11/30

    1 SUPREME

    COURT OF

    THE

    STATEOF

    NEW

    YORK EW

    YORK

    COUNTY

    PRESENT:

    HON.

    PAULWOOTEN

    PART_Z_

    Justice

    JAMESCOURi

    PlalnW,

    INDEX

    NO.

    113812/08

    - against

    JOHN

    SIEBERT

    nd

    JOHNW

    IEBERT MD.

    C.,

    Defendants.

    NO. 005

    Notice

    of otion/

    Order

    oShow

    CauseAffidavits

    ~

    xhibits

    A n s w e r i n a

    f f i d a v i t s

    x h i b i t s

    M e m o l

    \ filed

    R e p l y i n g A f f i d a v i t s R e p l y Memol

    f

    r - _

    A H

    2

    I I

    C r o s s - M o t i o n :U es No nn.nmrrtrmmi

    j.

    V B M ' i O P K

    Now e f o r e t h e C o u r t s a o t i o n

    by

    d n f e s C o u r i

    p l a i n t i f f ) ,

    p u r s u a n t o

    CPLR

    126,

    o r

    an r d e r t r i k i n g t h e d e f e n d a n t s ' answer and f f i r m a t i v e

    d e f e n s e s

    and

    e t t i n g t h i s

    m a t t e r down

    f o r an n q u e s t

    as

    o damages on h e b a s i s o f d e f e n d a n t s '

    e f u s a l

    t o

    comply i t h d i s c o v e r y

    demands e r v e d i n 2009, r d e r i n g d e f e n d a n t s

    o

    p r o d u c e

    documents and

    p r o d u c e d e f e n d a n t

    J o h n

    S i e b e r t

    o r a e p o s i t i o n . l a i n t i f f

    a l s o

    s e e k s

    i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n

    o f e f e n d a n t s ' o u n s e l

    J o s e p h

    M.

    u r k e , Esq.

    B u r k e ) . D e f e n d a n t s a r e n o p p o s i t i o n

    t o t h e m o t i o n , and h e p l a i n t i f f

    s u b m i t s

    a

    r e p l y .

    DISCUSSION

    T h i s

    a c t i o n

    2008 Case) as i l e d b y t h e

    p l a i n t i f f ,

    p r o e , and h i c h t h e C o u r t n o t e s

    d u p l i c a t l v e

    o f

    a n o t h e r

    a c t i o n

    p e n d i n g b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t i n C o u r i

    v

    S i e b e r t , under n d e x n o .

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    12/30

    i n j u n c t i o n

    w h i c h p r o h i b i t e d

    b o t h

    p a r t i e s from

    commencing a

    new

    a c t i o n o r

    i l i n g

    a

    new

    m o t i o n

    w i t h o u t

    l e a v e

    or

    p e r m i s s i o n o f

    the Court

    Order

    dated

    December 12,2005

    and

    February

    17 ,

    2006). P i a i n t i f T s c o m p l a i n t and c o u n t e r c l a i m s were subsequently d i s m i s s e d

    by

    the

    A p p e l l a t e

    D i v i s i o n ,

    F i r s t Department

    n F e b r u a r y 2008, h e r e i n t h e A p p e l l a t e

    D i v i s i o n

    g r a n t e d

    t h e

    d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o t r i k e

    t h e

    c l a i m s b a s e d u p o n p l a i n t i f f s c o n t i n u e d

    f l l u r e

    t o

    c o m p l y

    w i t h

    d i s c o v e r y d e m a n d s o r

    h i s

    t a x retums, u t the d e f e n d a n t s o u n t e r c l a i m remained see Couri

    v

    S i e b e r t ,

    8 D3d

    370 1 s t

    Dept 0 0 8 ] ) .

    With the consent

    o f

    the

    A d m i n i s t r a t i v e

    J u s t i c e ,

    the

    Honorable Michael

    J . Stallman, a

    p r i o r Judge

    a s s i g n e d

    t o

    t h e

    2004 Case, r a n t e d

    t h e

    p l a i n t i f f s o n e - t i m e a p p l i c a t i o n t o i l e a new

    a c t i o n . Thus, o n o r about O c t o b e r 7,2008, l a i n t i f f co m menced h e h e r e i n a c t i o n ,

    by

    S u m m o n s

    w i t h N o t i c e ,

    and

    s u b s e q u e n t l y

    i l e d

    a o m p l a i n t . D e f e n d a n t

    i l e d an answer w i t h c o u n t e r c l a i m s

    and issue

    was o i n e d .

    I n t h e 2004 Case, h i s C o u r t g r a n t e d d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o s t r i k e p l a i n t i f f s r e p l y

    t o

    d e f e n d a n t s o u n t e r c l a i m s

    and

    d i s m i s s e d t h e

    p l a i n t i f f s

    c o u n t e r c l a i m s by

    Court

    r d e r ,

    dated

    December

    24,2013,

    n t e r

    l i a

    f o r

    f a i l u r e

    t o

    comply

    w i t h

    d i s c o v e r y o r d e r s .

    I n

    s o

    o i n g

    t h i s

    C o u r t

    l a b e l e d t h e p l a i n t i f f a

    v e x a t i o u s i t i g a t o r

    and

    1)

    r a n t e d d e f e n d a n t s m o t i o n t o s t r i k e an d

    d i s m i s s p l a i n t i f f s r e p l y t o d e f e n d a n t s o u n t e r c l a i m s ;

    2)

    eemed

    l a i n t i f f

    a

    v e x a t i o u s

    l i t i g a t o r

    and

    e n j o i n e d

    p l a i n t i f f

    from:

    a) s s e r t i n g

    h i s

    m e d i c a l

    o r

    p h y s i c a l

    c o n d i t i o n ,

    o r m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t

    t h e r e o f , o r b) s s e r t i n g

    h i s

    u n a v a i l a b i l i t y

    b e i n g

    o u t o f s t a t e as a

    r e a s o n

    f o r non-appearance

    r

    n o n - p a r t i c i p a t i o n

    i n

    c o u r t p r o c e d u r e

    b e f o r e

    t h i s C o u r t o r S p e c i a l Referee r any C o u r t -

    a p p o i n t e e ,

    and 3) e - i s s u e d t h e i n t e r i m o r d e r s by J u s t i c e

    H a r o l d

    B e e i e r ,

    d a t e d F e b r u a r y

    1 7 ,

    2005,and h i s o r d e r dated December 12.2005,

    n

    which

    i l

    p a r t i e s were n j o i n e d f r o m t a k i n g

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    13/30

    f o r h i s n o n - a p p e a r a n c e o r t o send an

    a t t o r n e y

    on

    h i s

    b e h a l f .

    The

    e f e n d a n t s a p p e a r e d a t t h e

    c o n f e r e n c e

    a n d

    t h e

    Court proceeded t o

    c o n f e r e n c e the cases.

    Moreover, he

    r e l i e f sought by h e

    p l a i n t i f f i n t h i s

    m o t i o n , o w i t , d i s c o v e r y

    from

    the

    d e f e n d a n t s

    a n d h e d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n

    o f Burke

    s d u p l i c a t i v e o f p r e v i o u s m o t i o n s i l e d i n

    the

    2004

    C a s e . I n t h i s motion

    p l a i n t i f f

    s e e k s

    o r e - I H i g a t e i s s u e s t h a t

    ha v e b een r e s o l v e d

    by n u m e r o u s

    O r d e r s , n c l u d i n g M o t i o n

    Seque n ce 069

    n t h e 2004 Case,

    and

    a r e t h u s d e n i e d

    as

    m o o t ,

    b a r r e d

    by

    h e

    d o c t r i n e s

    o f

    r e s u d i c a t a see a r k e r v l a u v e l t V o l u n t e e r F i r e

    C o . , 93

    NY2d

    343,347

    [ 1 9 9 9 ]

    U n d e r r e s u d i c a t a ,

    o r

    daim p r e c l u s i o n ,

    a

    a l i d

    f i n a l

    j u d g m e n t

    b a r s

    f u t u r e a c t i o n s

    b e t w e e n t h e

    s a m e

    a r t i e s on h e s a m e a u s e o f c t i o n ] ;

    S e r i o v

    Town o f

    s l l p ,

    87

    AD3d 5 3 3 ,

    534 2 d

    D e p t

    2 0 1 1 ] a l t h o u g h

    t h e p l a i n t i f f a l i e g e s n t h e i n s t a n t

    a c t i o n

    t h a t t h e d e f e n d an t s

    e n g a g e d

    i n

    f r a u d ,

    h i s

    p u r p o r t e d

    new

    c i a i m

    o r

    t h e o r y

    i s

    g r o u n d e d

    on

    h e

    s a m e

    r a n s a c t i o n

    o r

    s e r i e s

    o f

    t r a n s a c t i o n s as h e

    p r i o r

    a c t i o n ] ;

    Y o n k e r s

    C o n t r .

    C o . , n c .

    v

    P o r t A u t h . T r a n s - H u d s o n

    C o r p . ,

    93

    NY2d

    3 7 5 , 380 1 9 9 9 ] a

    f i n a l

    c o n d u s i o n may e n d i c a t e d

    b y

    t h e

    c o u r t

    t h r o u g h t h e

    u s e o f

    o n t h e

    m e r i t s

    o r

    d i s m i s s a l w i t h p r e j u d i c e

    l a n g u a g e , b o t h i n t e r c h a ng e a b l y

    u s e d

    t o

    p r e d u d e u r t h e r l i t i g a t i o n

    on

    h e

    m a t t e r ] ) ,

    a n d

    c o l l a t e r a l e s t o p p e l [ t ] h e

    p a r t y s e e k i n g

    t h e

    b e n e f i t o f o l l a t e r a l

    e s t o p p e l

    m u s t d e m o n s t r a t e h a t

    t h e

    i d e n t i c a l

    i s s u e

    was e c e s s a r i l y

    d e d d e d

    i n t h e p r i o r

    a d j u d i c a t i o n a n d i s

    d e c i s i v e

    i n

    t h e n e w l y

    p r e s e n t e d c i r c u m s t a n c e a n d f o r u m . To

    b l o c k t h e u s e

    o f

    e s t o p p e l , a c o n t e s t a n t c a n

    show

    h e a b s e n c e o f a u l l and a i r o p p o r t u n i t y t o

    p r e s e n t r e l e v an f v i e w s i n

    t h e

    p r i o r c o n t e s f { D a vi d

    v B l o n d e ,

    92 NY2d 3 1 8 , 3 2 2

    1 9 9 8 ] ) .

    T h u s , l a i n t i f f s m o t i o n

    i s

    d e n i e d o n t h e b a s i s t h a t

    1 )

    t

    v i o l a t e s

    J u s t i c e B e e l e r i s O r d e r s ,

    and h i s

    C o u r t ' s

    o r d e r ,

    d a t e d December

    4 , 2 0 1 3 . w h i c h l a b e l s p l a i n t i f f a v e x a t i o u s l i t i g a t o r and

    e n j o i n s

    t h e p a r t i e s f r o m f i l i n g s u c h m o t i o n s w i t h o u t l e a v e o f t h e

    C o u r t ;

    2 )

    l a i n t i f f

    i m p r o p e r l y

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    14/30

    p l a i n t i f f

    a e l e p h o n e c o n f e r e n c e

    w i t h

    t h e . o u r t

    t o

    c o n s i d e r

    g r a n t i n g

    h i m

    l e a v e t o i l e t h i s

    m o t i o n ,

    w h i c h

    p l a i n t i f f

    i g n o r e d ,

    and

    he

    u b s e q u e n t l y

    i l e d

    t h i s

    m o t i o n

    w i t h o u t

    l e a v e o f t h e

    C o u r t

    {see

    Court

    r d e r dated p r i l

    6,2015).

    F u r t h e r m o r e , l a i n t i f f has made numerous

    t h e r

    motions o i s q u a l i f y Burke rom

    r e p r e s e n t i n g

    the

    e f e n d a n t s ,

    which

    have

    l i

    been e n i e d .

    As uch,

    he

    o r t i o n of

    l a i n t i f f s

    m o t i o n

    h e r e i n

    s e e k i n g

    t o

    d i s q u a l i f y

    d e f e n d a n t s '

    o u n s e l

    i s d e n i e d . There s no

    r e d i b l e

    o r

    r a t i o n a l b a s i s i n

    t h e

    C o u r t ' s r e c o r d t o s u p p o r t - s u c h an p p l i c a t i o n see

    i a o - D i Rest C o r p .

    v

    Paxton

    350,

    LLC, 2

    isc

    d

    1 1 7 I A ] , a t *2

    Sup

    t . NY

    ounty

    20081 rmotions o

    d i s q u a l i f y

    o p p o s i n g

    c o u n s e l a r e

    d i s f a v o r e d . .. nd

    r e q u i r e a

    i g h s t a n d a r d

    o f

    proof] ;

    G o l d s m i t h v

    E l l e n b e r g , 20^3WL 142264,

    8,2013

    NY i s c LEXIS 9 9 7 ,

    *17

    Sup t , NY o u n t y

    2 0 1 3 ] ;

    see

    l s o

    Northwestem

    / a t f .

    I n s .

    Co.

    v

    n s c o ,

    L t d . ,

    2011 WL 552997,

    4,2011

    US

    i s t

    LEXIS

    1 1 3 6 2 6 ,

    3 1 [SD

    NY

    0 1 1 ] ; T r a d e w l n d s i r l i n e s , I n c . v S o r o s , 2009WL 3 2 1 6 9 5 , 3 , 2 0 0 9 US

    D i s t LEXIS 0689, 9 SD NY 0 0 9 ] ; F l o r a s v i l l a r d J .

    P r i c e

    A s s o c s . , LLC, 0

    AD3d

    3 4 3 , 3 4 4

    [ 1 s t

    D e p t

    2005] M h e

    i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n

    o f

    a n a t t o r n e y

    s

    a

    a t t e r t h a t

    r e s t s w i t h i n t h e

    s o u n d

    d i s c r e t i o n

    o f

    t h e

    c o u r f

    ;

    see

    e l l s

    F a r g o B a n k ,

    N . A .

    v

    a r o ,

    8 2

    D3d

    880,881

    2 d D e p t

    2 0 1 1 ] ;

    F a l k v G a l l o ,

    73

    D 3 d

    6 8 5 , 6 8 5 2 d D e p t 2 0 1 0 ] ;

    a r r i $

    v S c u i c o ,

    3 6 A D 3 d 4 8 1 . 4 8 1

    I s t D e p t

    2009]).

    M o r e o v e r , l a i n t i f f s m o t i o n

    t o

    d i s q u a l i f y B u r k e

    as

    e f e n d a n t s ' o u n s e l s

    a t

    l e a s t t h e

    t e n t h s u c h m o t i o n t o d i s q u a l i f y h i m and h i s C o u r t c o n c l u d e s

    t h a t

    t

    i s f r i v o l o u s , t o t a l l y

    w i t h o u t

    m e r i t ,

    a n d

    c o m p l e t e l y u n s u p p o r t e d b y t h e

    C o u r t

    r e c o r d

    s u c h

    t h a t

    t h e

    C o u r t deems

    t

    t o

    be

    d e s i g n e d t o h a r a s s a n d a n n o y

    t h e

    d e f e n d a n t a n d h i s a t t o r n e y .

    P l a i n t i f f

    s o u g h t i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n

    i n

    t h e

    2004 Case as

    e c e n t l y

    as o t i o n Sequence

    69,

    h i c h was l s o d e n i e d ,

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    15/30

    T a v e l l a

    25 AD3d 523,524 1 s t D e p t 2 0 0 6 ] ) .

    P l a i n t i f f

    a c t i n g

    p r o

    s e , h a s e n g a g e d i n a

    a t t e r n

    o f a b u s i v e

    i i t i g a t i o n

    a g a i n s t t h e d e f e n d a n t b y i l i n g e x p e n s i v e f r i v o l o u s and d u p l i c a t i v e m o t i o n s

    d e s i g n e d t o

    h a r a s s ,

    i n j u r e and annoy h e

    d e f e n d a n t , and as

    a

    e s u l t

    p l a i n t i f f

    s s u b j e c t t o

    sanctions.

    P l a i n t i f f i n t h e 2004 Case p r e v i o u s l y f i l e d more than i x

    summary

    udgment

    m o t i o n s ,

    m u l t i p l e f r i v o l o u s motions o v a c a t e , motions o

    r e a r g u e ,

    m u l t i p l e motions o d i s q u a l i f y

    d e f e n d a n t s o u n s e l , and

    m o t i o n s s e e k i n g

    t o

    r e c u s e u d i c i a l

    o f f i c e r s t h a t

    r u l e a d v e r s e t o h i s

    p o s i t i o n ,

    and

    l m o s t

    l l

    o f t h e m o t i o n s r e p e a t e d l y a l l e g e t h e

    same

    r g u m e n t s . M o r e o v e r ,

    p l a i n t i f f s

    i n t e n t ,

    n

    b o t h

    t h e 2008 and h e 2004 Cases, s

    t o

    p r o l o n g t h e r e s o l u t i o n o f t h e

    m a t t e r

    as

    a

    means

    f h a r a s s i n g t h e d e f e n d a n t , and o w a s t e u d i c i a l r e s o u r c e s w h i c h i s e v i d e n t f r o m :

    ( 1 )

    l a i n t i f f s

    c h o i c e

    t o

    p r o c e e d

    p r o s e , a n d

    c o n t i n u e d

    r e p e a t e d

    f r i v o l o u s

    m o t i o n

    p r a p t i c e

    d e s p i t e

    w a r n i n g s

    by h e

    C o u r t and r d e r s ;

    2 )

    l a i n t i f f s

    f a i l u r e

    t o

    make

    o u r t

    a p p e a r a n c e s f o r

    good

    c a u s e i n o r d e r t o r e p r e s e n t h i m s e l f

    o r

    t o

    p r o v i d e an

    t t o r n e y f o r

    same; 3)

    e p e a t e d l y r e f u s i n g

    o r i g n o r i n g C o u r t

    o r d er s t o c o o p e r a t e

    w i t h

    t h e

    d i s c o v e r y

    p r o c e s s ;

    4 ) e r b a l l y

    a b u s i n g

    C o u r t

    p e r s o n n e l

    b y t e l e p h o n e a n d r e p e a t e d l y

    l e a v i n g

    h a r a s s i n g

    a n d t h r e a t e n i n g m e s s a g e s

    o n

    t h e

    C o u r t

    m e s s a g e s y s t e m ; a n d

    ( 5 )

    i s r e p e a t e d i n s i s t e n c e f o r m o r e t h a n 1 1 y e a r s ,

    h a t

    h e s t o o

    t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n C o u r t p r o c e d u r e s , a p p e a r a n c e s a n d c o n f e r e n c e s

    w h e n e v e r

    t h e C o u r t s e e k s

    t o

    move h i s case or respond

    o

    h i s telephone e q u e s t s .

    The

    l a i n t i f f

    h a s c h o s e n t o

    p r o c e e d

    p r o se when h e

    i l e d

    t h i s

    a c t i o n

    i n

    2004

    n d 2 0 0 8 ,

    a n d h a s

    a l s o p r o f f e r e d

    a n

    u n d o c u m e n t e d i l l n e s s w h i c h h a s

    k e p t

    h i m f r o m p r o s e c u t i n g t h i s

    a c t i o n s i n c e 2004. P l a i n t i f f has o t

    s u b s t a n t i a t e d any

    such l l n e s s as he has a i l e d t o

    t i m e l y

    p r o v i d e t h e p r o p e r me d i c a l a u t h o r i z a t i o n s a n d h e h a s a i l e d

    t o

    p r o v i d e

    v a l i d d o c u m e n t a t i o n

    o f

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    16/30

    f a i l u r e t o

    f o l l o w

    t h i s C o u r t ' s i n j u n c t i o n r e q u i r i n g

    t h a t

    he b t a i n p e r m i s s i o n of he Court r i o r t o

    f i l i n g

    any

    new c t i o n o r

    m o t i o n , a n d / o r warned h e

    p l a i n t i f f t h a t

    t h i s c o n t i n u e d

    a c t i o n would

    be

    s a n c t i o n a b l e

    see M o t i o n Sequences 047,058, rder a t e d A u g u s t . 3 , 2 0 1 0 , M o t i o n Sequences

    055,054,

    r d e r d a t e d

    J u l y 6,2010,

    .

    3

    , M o t i o n Sequence

    060,061,062,063,065,

    r d e r

    d a t e d

    June

    30,2011,

    o t i o n

    Sequence 042,064, rder

    a t e d September

    27,2011, n t e r i m

    C o u r t

    O r d e r , d a t e d

    J a n u a r y

    17,2014, .

    2

    ; n t e r i m C o u r t O r d e r , d a t e d F e b r u a r y

    18,2014,

    .

    3 7 o t i o n sequence 067, a t e d December 4 , 2 0 1 3 ) . N o t w i t h s t a n d i n g t h e p u b l i c p o l i c y

    r e q u i r i n g

    f r e e a c c e s s

    t o t h e

    c o u r t s ,

    t h e

    m o t i o n c o u r t ' s

    o r d e r

    b a r r i n g p l a i n t i f f f r o m

    i n i t i a t i n g

    f u r t h e r

    i t i g a t i o n o r

    m o t i o n p r a c t i c e a g a i n s t

    d e f e n d a n t s w i t h o u t

    p r i o r c o u r t

    a p p r o v a l

    u n l e s s he s

    r e p r e s e n t e d

    b y c o u n s e l was u s t i f i e d b y

    p i a i n f r i f

    s

    o n t i n u o u s

    a n d v e x a t i o u s

    l i t i g a t i o n

    a g a i n s t

    d e f e n d a n t s '

    B a n u s h i

    v Law

    f f .

    o f

    c o t t

    W.

    p s t e i n ,

    1 1 1 AD3d

    558,558

    1 s t

    D e p t

    2 0 1 3 ] ;

    B r e y t m a n v P i n n a c l e

    G r o u p , 110 AD3d

    754

    2 d D e p t

    2 0 1 3 ] w h i l e p u b l i c p o l i c y

    m a n d a t e s

    f r e e

    a c c e s s t o t h e c o u r t s , when

    a

    i t i g a n t

    i s

    a b u s i n g

    t h e u d i c i a l p r o c e s s b y

    h a r a s s i n g

    i n d i v i d u a l s

    s o l e l y o u t o f l l

    w i l l

    o r

    p i t e ,

    e q u i t y

    may

    n j o i n

    s u c h v e x a t i o u s

    i t i g a t i o n ] ; D I m e r y v U l s t e r

    S a v i n g s B a n k ,

    82 D3d1034 2 d

    D e p t 2 0 1 1 ] ) ; r t ) - B r a s i l

    R e s s e g u r o s

    S . A . ,

    59 AD3d t

    366

    [ T h e c o u r t p r o p e r l y i n v o k e d

    I t s

    e q u i t y p o w e r

    t o

    e n j o i n d e f e n d a n t s f r o m p r o s e c u t i n g t h e

    a c t i o n .

    ..

    n o r d e r t o

    p r e v e n t t h e

    w a s t e

    o f

    u d i c i a l

    r e s o u r c e s , u n n e c e s s a r y l e g a l

    e x p e n s e s ,

    a n d

    d u p l i c a t i v e

    l i t i g a t i o n

    t h a t

    m i g h t l e a d

    t o c o n f l i c t i n g

    r e s u l t s ' ] C o u r i

    v

    S i e b e r t ,

    4 8

    AD3d

    370

    1 s t

    D e p t

    2 0 0 8 ] ; Lammers L a m m e r s , 235 AD2d 286 1 s t D e p t 1 9 9 7 ] G i v e n t h e

    n u m e r o u s

    f r i v o l o u s

    m o t i o n s d e f e n d a n t

    has made, t was

    a

    p r o p e r e x e r c i s e o f d i s c r e t i o n f o r t h e c o u r t t o

    e n j o i n h e r f r o m m a k i n g a n y

    u r t h e r m o t i o n

    i n t h i s a c t i o n w i t h o u t

    j u d i c i a l

    a p p r o v a l ] ; S c h w a r t z

    v

    N o r d s t r o m , n c . , 160 AD2d 2 4 0 , 2 4 2 , a p p e a l

    d i s m i s s e d

    76

    NY2d

    845 imO], v

    d e n i e d

    76

    NY2d

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    17/30

    I n

    denying the h e r e i n m o t i o n i n

    i t s

    e n t i r e t y , ,

    t h e

    Court a l s o f i n d s

    t

    a p p r o p r i a t e t o impose

    s a n c t i o n s

    i n

    the

    am o u n t

    of

    2,500.00

    g a i n s t

    t h e

    p l a i n t i f f ,

    p u r s u a n t

    t o

    NYCRR

    3 0 - 1 . 1 ,

    o r

    b r i n g i n g a

    r i v o l o u s a n d d u p l i c a t i v e m o t i o n , brought

    p r i m a r i l y

    t o

    harass

    an d

    waste

    Court

    r e s o u r c e s ,

    w i t h o u t

    p r i o r

    c o u r t a p p r o v a l . F i n a l l y ,

    t h e

    V e r i f i e d

    C o m p l a i n t i s

    d i s m i s s e d f o r

    p l a i n t i f f s f a i l u r e t o appear t

    t h e

    c a l l o f t h e c a l e n d a r f o r a mandatory Compliance

    Conference

    on F e b r u a r y 2 6 , 2 0 1 4 , p u r s u a n t t o

    2 2

    NYCRR 0 2 . 2 7 ( b ) . T h i s C o u r t has

    p r e v i o u s l y r u l e d

    t h a t

    p l a i n t i f f

    c a n n o t

    use h i s

    m e d i c a l

    c o n d i t i o n , w h i c h p l a i n t i f f has a i l e d t o s u b s t a n t i a t e

    t h r o u g h v a l i d

    and

    a d m i s s i b l e d o c u m e n t a t i o n , as a b a s i s f o r a l l i n g t o appear n

    C o u r t

    or o f o l l o w t h i s C o u r t ' s

    O r d e r s .

    CONCLUSION

    A c c o r d i n g l y

    t I s ,

    ORDERED h a t p l a i n t i f f James C o u r t ' s m o t i o n b r o u g h t p u r s u a n t t o CPLR 3 1 2 6 , o r an

    O r d e r t r i k i n g

    t h e d e f e n d a n t s '

    a n s w e r

    a n d

    a f f i r m a t i v e

    d e f e n s e s a n d s e t t i n g

    t h i s

    m a t t e r

    d own

    o r

    an

    i n q u e s t

    as

    o

    damages o n t h e b a s i s

    o f d e f e n d a n t s '

    r e f u s a l

    t o

    c o m p l y w i t h d i s c o v e r y

    demands

    e r v e d

    i n

    2 0 0 9 ,

    o r d e r i n g

    d e f e n d a n t s

    t o

    p r o d u c e

    d o c u m e n t s

    and

    p r o d u c e d e f e n d a n t

    J o h n S i e b e r t . f o r a e p o s i t i o n , and o r d i s q u a l i f i c a t i o n o f d e f e n d a n t s ' c o u n s e l

    J o s e p h

    M.

    u r k e ,

    Esq. s d e n i e d i n

    i t s

    e n t i r e t y ; a n d

    t

    i s f u r t h e r ,

    ORDERED h a t t h e V e r i f i e d

    C o m p l a i n t

    s d i s m i s s e d

    f o r

    p l a i n t i f f s f a i l u r e

    t o

    a p p e a r

    a t

    t h e

    c a l l o f t h e c a l e n d a r

    f o r

    a m a n d a t o r y

    C o m p l i a n c e

    C o n f e r e n c e on F e b r u a r y

    2 6 ,

    2 0 1 4 , p u r s u a n t t o

    NYCRR

    0 2 . 2 7 ( b ) ; a n d t i s f u r t h e r ,

    ORDERED h a t t h e C o u r t

    sua p o n t e

    imposes a n c t i o n s a g a i n s t

    p l a i n t i f f

    i n t h e

    amount

    o f

    2 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 , p u r s u a n t t o

    2 2

    NYCRR 3 0 - 1 . 1 , o r i l i n g a u c c e s s i v e r i v o l o u s

    m o t i o n I n v i o l a t i o n

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    18/30

    C o u r t o r t r a n s m i t t a l t o

    t h e

    C o m m i s s i o n e r o f

    T a x a t i o n

    a n d

    F i n a n c e ;

    a n d t i s f u r t h e r ,

    ORDERED h a t

    t h e

    O r d e r s o f u s t i c e

    H a r o l d

    B e e l e r ,

    a n d

    t h e O r d e r o f h i s C o u r t

    d a t e d

    D e c e m b e r 2 4 , 2 0 1 3

    r e

    t l l i n

    p l a c e

    a n d a r e

    r e i s s u e d ,

    a n d t h e h e r e i n p a r t i e s a r e e n j o i n e d f r o m

    t a k i n g a n y

    u r t h e r a c t i o n

    i n t h i s m a t t e r

    i n c l u d i n g ,

    i l i n g a n y m o t i o n s , o r i l i n g a n y

    n e w

    c t i o n s

    b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t ,

    w i t h o u t

    p r i o r l e a v e o f

    h e

    A d m i n i s t r a t i v e J u s t i c e

    o f

    t h i s C o u r t ; a n d t i s

    f u r t h e r .

    ORDERED

    h a t

    p l i n t i f f

    i s

    c o n t i n u e d t o

    b e

    d e e m e d

    a

    v e x a t i o u s

    l i t i g t o r

    a n d

    i s

    e n j o i n e d

    f r o m ; 1 )

    s s e r t i n g

    h i s

    m e d i c a l o r p h y s i c a l c o n d i t i o n , o r m e d i c a l t r e a t m e n t t h e r e o f , o r 2 )

    a s s e r t i n g h i s

    u n a v a i l a b i l i t y

    b e i n g o u t o f t a t e a s

    a

    e a s o n o r n o n - a p p e a r a n c e o r n o n -

    p a r t i c i p a t i o n I n c o u r t p r o c e d u r e b e f o r e t h i s

    C o u r t o r

    S p e c i a l

    R e f e r e e

    o r a n y C o u r t - a p p o i n t e e ;

    and t i s

    f u r t h e r ,

    ORDERED

    h a t

    t h e

    p a r t i e s

    a i l u r e

    t o

    c o m p l y w i t h t h e

    t e r m s

    o f

    t h i s

    o r d e r s h a l l

    s u b j e c t

    t h e p a r t i e s t o

    d i s m i s s a l

    o f h e i r a c t i o n , a n c t i o n s o r c o n t e m p t

    o f

    t h e C o u r t ;

    a n d

    t i s f u r t h e r ,

    ORDERED h a t

    t h e

    C l e r k o f t h e

    C o u r t

    a n d t h e C o u n t y C l e r k o f N e w Y o r k C o u n t y a r e

    o r d e r e d n o t t o a c c e p t

    a n y

    u r t h e r

    p a p e r s

    i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h

    t h i s

    m a t t e r , n c l u d i n g a n y

    m o t i o n s ,

    n o r

    s

    p l i n t i f f

    a l l o w e d t o

    c o m m e n c e

    a n y

    n e w

    a c t i o n s

    w i t h o u t

    p r i o r

    l e a v e

    o f

    t h e

    A d m i n i s t r a t i v e

    J u s t i c e

    o f t h i s C o u r t ; and

    t

    i s

    f u r t h e r ,

    ORDERED h a t

    t h e d e f e n d a n t s s h a l l

    s e r v e a c o p y o f

    h i s

    O r d e r

    w i t h

    N o t i c e o f E n t r y o n

    t h e

    p l i n t i f f a n d t h e C l e r k o f t h e

    C o u r t

    w h o s d i r a c t f t H t n

    j i i r f f | m o n f

    a c c o r d i n g l y .

    T h i s c o n s t i t i ^ J ^ ^ ^ ^ p 6 l | ^ o | h e o u r t

    i JAN 7

    aM

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    19/30

    \ \ j a SUPREME COURT

    OF

    THE STATE OF

    NEW

    ORK

    ) NEW YORK

    COUNTY

    Ui

    CO

    >

    e

    s

    s

    lU

    u.

    Il l

    K

    IS

    i i

    O

    z

    S 2 I

    U J

    j

    o

    u.

    S I

    P R E S E N T :

    P a u l

    Wooten

    PART

    Ir

    Justle9

    I n d e x Number: 0 1 0 3 3 / 2 0 1 5

    COURI JAMES

    vs

    burke.

    OSEPH M.

    SEQUENCE NUMBER:

    02

    SUMMARY UDGMENT

    l i l S T i b N 8 g Q . N 0 . .

    NVC

    OFRCE

    Y g U P R i M E , C O U R T

    -

    p i i

    T h e o l l o w i n g p a p e r s ,

    n u m b e r e d

    1 o4

    e r e r e

    a d o n h i s m o t i o n t o / f o r

    | N o ( s ) . _ L 3 l ^

    | N q ( ) . 3

    Notice o f Motion/Order o ShowCause~fRdavHs

    xhibits

    Answering f f i d a v i t s

    x h i b i t s

    Replying f f i d a v i t s

    U p o n

    t h e o

    r a

    g o i n g

    p a p e r s ,

    t

    I s

    o r d e r e d t h a t

    h i s

    m o t i o n

    s

    d i C \ d i O ^

    VH

    3 C O O ( i S ^ S P C &

    UOcV^

    ' ^ m S T f i o f t a i n d u i i r i d e e i i s ^

    \ a

    V o o W i

    S e c i M e w i f l

    oo\.

    FILED

    JAN27 I I

  • 7/26/2019 2016-02-11 - Couri - three recent decisions and $25M judgment.pdf

    20/30

    SUPREME COURT OF

    THE

    STATE

    OFNEWYORK

    EWYORK

    COUNTY

    PRESENT: HON,

    PAULWOOTEN

    RT

    Justice

    JAMES

    COURi,

    - against

    -

    P l a i n t i f r

    n

    1033rt8

    NDEX NO.^ ..nrs

    JOSEPHM. URKE

    SQ.,

    RUSSO URKE

    ESQ.,JOHNDOE -10

    Defsndants.

    The o l l o w i n g

    p a p e r s

    numbered 1 o 2 were e a d on

    h i s

    m o t i o n by e f e n d a n t s t o d i s m l s e t h e

    complaint.

    PAPERS NUMBERED

    N o t i c e of o t i o n /

    Order

    o

    S h o w CauseAffidavits

    . E x h i b i t s

    Answering

    A f f i d a v i t s

    x h i b i t s Mem