Content 2015/S5_1... · Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method Coil system generating an...

13
1 Analyses of the chemical and structural integrity of gold bullions by eddy current probes Page 1 LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter Daniel Sutter, Helmut Fischer AG Switzerland Quentin Bochud, Metalor SA Switzerland LBMA Assaying and Refining Conference, London, March 2015 Content Introduction: Basic idea of using eddy-current probes to study the properties of precious metal bullions Part I: method and instrumentation Part II: applications on bullions Conclusions ___ Abbreviation: electrical conductivity, s (Sigma) Page 2 LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015 Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

Transcript of Content 2015/S5_1... · Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method Coil system generating an...

1

Analyses of the chemical and structural integrity of

gold bullions by eddy current probes

Page 1LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Daniel Sutter, Helmut Fischer AG Switzerland

Quentin Bochud, Metalor SA Switzerland

LBMA Assaying and Refining Conference, London, March 2015

Content

Introduction: Basic idea of using eddy-current probes to study the propertiesof precious metal bullions

Part I: method and instrumentation

Part II: applications on bullions

Conclusions

___

Abbreviation: electrical conductivity, s (Sigma)

Page 2LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

2

Introduction

Fake gold bars:

Gold coated tungsten bars (>)

Gold bars with tungsten rod inclusion (>)

Bars with defects

Pores, bubbles, inclusions

Hammerings (>)

Bars with poor quality in other aspects

Instrumentation available to identifyboth fakes or low quality bars?

Page 3LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Part I: Methods and instrumentation

Element composition: Fire-assay, WD-XRF, ED-XRF, ICP-OES,Spark-OES, etc.*

Structural integrity: Ultrasonic methods, transmission X-raymethods, eddy-current flaw detection technologies, radio wavetransmission, density analysis, metallography, etc.**

Page 4LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

ED-XRF*

Ultrasonic**

Eddy-current

Analytical integrity, composition

Inspection of bullions

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

3

Part I: Metals and electrical conductivity

Electrical conductivity, s , units MS/m

Gold: 45, Silver: 63, Copper: 60 MS/m

Materials properties affecting s

Microstructure: perfect crystal lattice → maximal sAny defect reducing s (impurities, alloying, inclusions, precipitations, pores,stress&strain, grain boundaries, surfaces, etc.)

Temperature: T s

Page 5LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Ref: ESA Edu site

s

s

Electrical conductivity, s , units MS/m

Gold: 45, Silver: 63, Copper: 60 MS/m

Materials properties affecting s

Microstructure: perfect crystal lattice → maximal sAny defect reducing s (impurities, alloying, inclusions, precipitations, pores,stress&strain, grain boundaries, surfaces, etc.)

Temperature: T s

Part I: Metals and electrical conductivity

Page 6LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Parameter Implication

Alloying elements of interest

Inclusions, precipitations, pores of interest

Grain boundaries avoid influence

Stress&strain avoid influence

Temperature avoid influence

Surfaces avoid influence

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

4

Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method

Following ISO 2360 for coating thickness measurements and DINEN 2004-1 / ASTM E1004 for conductivity measurements

Simple and industry approved instrumentation

Page 7LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Sigmascope®

by Helmut Fischer

Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method

Coil system generating an alternating magnetic field which isinducing eddy-currents in el. conducting materials. Eddy-currentsreduce the total magnetic flux, change of flux is detected by theprobe

Evaluation:amplitude > distance from material+thicknessphase > conductivity of material+thickness

Calibration:phase vs. s of certified referencematerials

Page 8LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

5

Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method

Coil system generating an alternating magnetic field which isinducing eddy-currents in el. conducting materials. Eddy-currentsreduce the total magnetic flux, change of flux is detected by theprobe

Evaluation:amplitude > distance from material+thicknessphase > conductivity of material+thickness

Calibration:phase vs. s of certified referencematerials

Page 9LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method

Performance (Sigmascope Gold B, FS14 probe at 1 kHz)Repeatability: 0.03 MS/mAccuracy: 0.3 MS/mMeasuring time: 2 sec

Robust againstContact quality: can be operated in non-contact modeSurface quality: neither grease nor roughness a problem

Sensitive againstThickness: frequency dependent probing depthTemperature: to be monitored and corrected (sensors available)Stamping: has minor influence

Page 10LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

6

Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method

PerformanceRepeatability:Accuracy:Measuring time:

Robust againstContact quality: can be operated in non-contact modeSurface quality: neither grease nor roughness a problem

Sensitive againstThickness: frequency dependent probing depthTemperature: to be monitored and corrected (sensors available)Stamping: has minor influence

Page 11LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Metals can be analyzed through plastic foils, no coupling medium needed

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 500 1000 1500rela

tive

devi

atio

n [%

]

polymer foil thickness [um]

PerformanceRepeatability:Accuracy:Measuring time:

Robust againstContact quality: can be operated in non-contact modeSurface quality: neither grease nor roughness a problem

Sensitive againstThickness: frequency dependent probing depthTemperature: to be monitored and corrected (sensors available)Stamping: has minor influence

Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method

Page 12LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Probe frequency for different bar types (it’s the only parameter!)

In doubt stack two bars…

s

0

1

fdepth

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

7

PerformanceRepeatability:Accuracy:Measuring time:

Robust againstContact quality: can be operated in non-contact modeSurface quality: neither grease nor roughness a problem

Sensitive againstThickness: frequency dependent probing depthTemperature: to be monitored and corrected (sensors available)Stamping: has minor influence

Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method

Page 13LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

s changes ~ 5% per 10°C! Software applies corrections to measured s with input of material and temperature.

> more on this in Part II

Part I: Phase-sensitive eddy-current method

PerformanceRepeatability:Accuracy:Measuring time:

Robust againstContact quality: can be operated in non-contact modeSurface quality: neither grease nor roughness a problem

Sensitive againstThickness: frequency dependent probing depthTemperature: to be monitored and corrected (sensors available)Stamping: has minor influence

Page 14LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Surface features with significant conductivity have an impact on how fields propagate. Deep stampings affect the measurements (especially at high frequencies).

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

8

Part II: Applications on bullions

Page 15LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Part II: Analyses of bars 999.9 ‰ and defects

Page 16LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Bullion 1 Bullion 2 Bullion 3 Bullion 4 Bullion 5 Bullion 6

Mean 44.56 44.40 44.32 44.50 44.43 33.52

Std.dev. 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.68

What’s the problem?

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

9

Part II: Analyses of bars 999.9 ‰ and defects

Page 17LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Bullion 1 Bullion 2 Bullion 3 Bullion 4 Bullion 5 Bullion 6

Mean 44.56 44.40 44.32 44.50 44.43 33.52

Std.dev. 0.08 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.68

What’s the problem?

Eddy Currents allow the detection of bullions with defects:

Bubbles

Inclusions

Part II: Integrity of gold bullions Analysis

Page 18LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Pure gold Gold with tungstenrods

45.15 31.46

45.22 33.50

45.20 30.93

45.26 34.41

45.25 33.56

Mean 45.22 32.77

Std.dev. 0.04 1.50

Difference of response between pure and fake bullions

Worse repeatability on fake bar (not homogeneous)

Response is similar to that of bar with defects

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

10

Page 19LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Pure gold Gold with tungstenrods

45.15 31.46

45.22 33.50

45.20 30.93

45.26 34.41

45.25 33.56

Mean 45.22 32.77

Std.dev. 0.04 1.50

Difference of response between pure and fake bullions

Worse repeatability on fake bar (not homogeneous)

Response is similar to that of bar with defects

A Significant correlation R2 > 0.6

But an important variation without a specific rang

Influence of temperature Influence of minor elements Influence of surface

>100 bars with titles in995 - 999.9 ‰ were tested

Part II: Gold between 995 and 999.9‰

Page 20LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

y = 1.1778x - 1133.7R² = 0.6253

3637383940414243444546

995 996 997 998 999 1000

Con

duct

ivity

[MS

/m]

Au title [‰]

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

11

Influence of temperature

Without control (>)

under control (with a stabilization of sample and equipment)at fixed temperature: 20°C at variable temperature

(corrected by Sigmascope)

Part II: Gold between 995 and 999.9‰

Page 21LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

43.0

43.5

44.0

44.5

45.0

45.5

15 20 25 30

cond

uctiv

ity [M

S/m

]

temperature [°C]

Au5N Au 997.5 Au 995

Average 46.64 44.36 41.28

SD 0.15 0.17 0.12

Au5N Au 997.5 Au 995

Average 46.69 44.38 41.33

SD 0.11 0.18 0.09

Possibility to do a calibration (in range of 995-999.9 ‰)

But it works only with Binary alloys

Or to perform QC on home-made alloys

Part II: Binary alloys analysis

Page 22LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

y = 1.1007x - 1053.9R² = 0.9951

40.0

41.0

42.0

43.0

44.0

45.0

46.0

47.0

48.0

994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001

cond

uctiv

ity [M

S/m

]

Gold title [‰]

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

12

Why only with binary alloys ?

Conductivities are different withdifferent minor elements!

Exactly the same purity of gold (995 ‰)

But the conductivity of gold with copper is lower than that of gold with silver

Part II: Binary alloys analysis

Page 23LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Au 995 ‰Ag 5 ‰

Au 995 ‰Cu 5 ‰

41.45 36.41

41.42 36.51

41.41 36.53

41.39 36.40

41.35 36.49

Mean 41.40 36.47

Std.dev. 0.04 0.06

Conclusions

Page 24LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Refiner

Banks / Industry

Assay officesTrade

Recycler

Monitoring of production

Check integrity of bar

Judgments based on simple criteria! s > 44 MS/m: 999.5 grade bar 44 > s > 35 MS/m: LBMA grade

bar s < 35 MS/m: suspicious bar →

further investigation

Quality control information Title Pores Inclusions Other defects…

Gold

Tolerance limits display

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter

13

Conclusions

Page 25LBMA 2015, Bochud-Jodry-Sutter

Questions….

Thank you for your attention.

___

Additional Informationwww.goldanalysis.comwww.helmutfischer.com

ContactsDaniel Sutter, [email protected] Bochud, [email protected]

LBMA Assaying & Refining Conference 2015 8-10 March 2015

Session 5 - Bochud & Sutter