2015 KPMG EMA Tax Summit...New Regulations New Approaches New Norms Cheng Chi Head of China & Hong...
Transcript of 2015 KPMG EMA Tax Summit...New Regulations New Approaches New Norms Cheng Chi Head of China & Hong...
2015 KPMG EMA Tax Summit
New Regulations New ApproachesNew Norms
Cheng ChiHead of China & Hong Kong SARGlobal Transfer Pricing Services
3© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Revised transfer pricing regulations
Challenging Post-BEPS Environment
Effective period and retroactivity
Divergence or
consistency
Specific and overt wording
Source: Public consultation draft of SAT Circular on Implementation Measures for Special Tax Adjustments issued on September 17, 2015
4© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
China – BEPS Integration (Draft Regulations for Public Consultation)
• DEMPE vs. DEMPEP• Control vs.
Performance• Important functions• Significant vs. unique
and valuable intangibles
Intangibles
• Direct and indirect economic benefit (6 tests) + OECD benefit test
• No safe harbour for low value adding services
Services
Effective 1 Jan 2016 – applicable to cases opened but not concluded on 1 Jan 2016!
5© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
China – BEPS Integration (Draft Regulations for Public Consultation)
• No mention of LSAs being potentially being passed to end-customers
• Could invalidate one-sided methods due to lack of local comparables and/or reliable adjustments
Location specific advantages
• Value Chain Contribution Method - Applied when comparability information is difficult to obtain (intangibles, LSAs, lack of local comps)
• Valuation methods introduced for intangibles and equity transfers
New methods
Effective 1 Jan 2016 – applicable to cases opened but not concluded on 1 Jan 2016!
6© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
China – BEPS Integration (Draft Regulations for Public Consultation)
• LF to include “Value Chain Analysis”
• Special Documentation on Services, CSAs and Thin Cap
Documentation
• Denial of tax deduction of payments to entities with no substance
• Toll manufacturing• Reverse TNMM• Recharacterisation• De-registration
Special tax adjustments
• Priority given to applications with thorough value chain analysis and LSA considerations
• Adjustment to median
APAs
Effective 1 Jan 2016 – applicable to cases opened but not concluded on 1 Jan 2016!
7© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
China – BEPS Integration (Draft Regulations for Public Consultation)
• Thin cap – earning stripping or group limitation rules not introduced
• CFC• GAAR – purpose-focused test
Other SAARs and GAAR
Effective 1 Jan 2016 – applicable to cases opened but not concluded on 1 Jan 2016!
8© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Top issues for MNEs
PE
Legacy issues
Compliance challengesIntangibles
Contract R&D
IP Holding Structure
Agency PE Anti-fragmentation rules Profit attribution mechanism?
Deductibility questionable?
Funding + “rubber stamping” no longer sustainable
Unanticipated risks for legacy tax planning (e.g. global profits historically concentrated in low-tax, low-substance jurisdictions)
Can cost plus be sustained?
Divergent views leading to tax frictions (double taxation)
Significantly tailored and expanded LF requirements
Special Documentation
9© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Transfer pricing audit statistics
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Adjustment Amount
(RMB million) 679 987 1,240 2,090 2,310 2,400 4,600 4,594 7,900
Cases Concluded 177 173 152 167 178 207 175 211 257
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,0009,000
Adjustment Amount (RMB million) Cases Concluded
Tax authorities are increasingly focusing on cases with the largest exposures.
Number of cases concluded in 2014257
Total Adjustment Amount in RMB Billion7.90
30.68 Ave. Adjustment Amount, RMB Million
20Number of Cases with
Adjustment Amount exceeding RMB 100 Million
83Number of Cases with
Adjustment Amount exceeding RMB 10 million
Source: KPMG Intelligence (Estimation)
10© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Transfer pricing self-adjustments statistics
Additional tax revenue collected from self-adjustments grew significantly over the past five years.Circular 54 [2014] formalises self-adjustments.
7.1
20.828.3
37.7 39.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Additional taxes from self-adjustments
1,562 self-adjustments in 2014. Beijing, Jiangsu, Shanghai, Guangdong, Shenzhen and Anhui are the most “active”.
Source: KPMG Intelligence (Estimation)
11© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
1.Risk review
and assessment
on current
model
Approach and Recommendation (1)
What KPMG can help
• TP compliance review• TP risk assessment
Review the organization structure of the group entities and identify any entity lack of substance or with mismatched function/risk/asset profile
Review the RPTs within the group from the perspectives of transaction type, flow, profitability and value chain contribution related to the involving parties
Conduct risk assessment on the RPTs in the group and focus on the value chain and transactions related to the PRC entities
12© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
2.Re-planning
Approach and Recommendation (2)
What KPMG can help
• M&A advisory• TP planning & supporting
document preparation
Analyze the necessity of value chain transformation and TP policy optimization
Feasibility study on the available options
Regularly review the implementation of the pricing policy and assess the necessity of any adjustment
13© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
3.Compliance
Approach and Recommendation (3)
What KPMG can help
• TP documentation • TP supporting document
preparation/review
Assess the resources for compliance work, then review and improve the relevant compliance procedures
Identify better disclosure position
Prepare and retain sufficient supporting documents and materials in detail
14© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm hasany authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
4.Dispute
Resolution
Approach and Recommendation (4)
What KPMG can help
• TP training• TP dispute resolution
Pre-audit: identify the risks and prepare the appropriate supporting documents
In audit: response to the tax authorities’ quires and form TP position with solid technical ground
Post-audit: continuously monitor the compliance performance
Thank you
Presentation by Cheng Chi
16
© 2015 KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.