![Result Presentation for December 31, 2015 [Result]](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/577c87401a28abe054c4058c/result-presentation-for-december-31-2015-result.jpg)
2015 Enhancement Result
2
HCCB-CRIMINOLOGY INTITUTIONAL ENHANCEMENT MOCK-BOARD EXAMINATION RESULT 2015 NAMES CRIMINAL JURIS- PRUDENCE (20%) LAW ENFORCE- MENT ADMIN (20%) CRIMINLISTIC (20%) CRIME DETECTION, INVESTIGATION &PREVENTION (15%) CRIMINAL SOCIOLOGY, & ETHICS (15%) CORRECTIONAL ADMIN (10%) GENERA L AVERAG E RATING REMARKS NO. SCORE (100) RATINGS SCORE (100) RATING SCORE (100) RATINGS SCORE (100) RATINGS SCORE (100) RATING SCORE (100) RATINGS 1 ABULENCIA, RICARDO C. 54 10.8 % 58 11.6 % 34 6.8% 65 9.75% 66 9.9% 50 5.0% 53.85 % 2 ALVAR, JOSEPH E. 70 14% 67 13.4 % 36 7.2% 69 10.35 % 58 8.7% 44 4.4% 58.05 % 3 BERJA, NATHANIEL P. 29 5.8% 46 9.2% 32 6.6% 48 7.2% 50 7.5% 44 4.4% 40.7% 4 CANOSA, RICHARD L. 43 8.6% 36 7.2% 34 6.8% 50 7.5% 62 9.3% 34 3.4% 42.8% 5 DONGIAPON, ROMIL F. 38 7.6% 38 7.6% 33 6.6% 46 6.9% 56 8.4% 44 4.4% 41.5% 6 MONDAY, ALBON JUVY M. 42 8.4% 48 9.6% 32 6.4% 58 8.7% 49 7.4% 76 7.6% 48.1% 7 SANTIAGO, ARIEL L. 23 4.6% 34 6.8% 25 5% 40 6% 37 5.6% 24 2.4% 30.4% 8 UDTOJAN, JUNE JAVE M. 51 10.2 % 55 11% 41 8.2% 68 10.2% 62 9.3% 54 5.4% 54.3% 9 10 SCORING SYSTEM: SCORING IS BASED ON WEIGHT % PER SUBJECT AREA Note: Each major area is subdivided into specific sub-areas of concerns as well as their corresponding description of scope and coverage based on Republic Act 6506, creating the board of criminology. Prepared by:
-
Upload
rico-t-musong -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
2
description
result
Transcript of 2015 Enhancement Result
HCCB-CRIMINOLOGY INTITUTIONAL ENHANCEMENT MOCK-BOARD EXAMINATION RESULT 2015
NAMES CRIMINAL JURIS-PRUDENCE
(20%)
LAW ENFORCE-MENTADMIN
(20%)
CRIMINLISTIC
(20%)
CRIME DETECTION,INVESTIGATION &PREVENTION
(15%)
CRIMINAL SOCIOLOGY,& ETHICS
(15%)
CORRECTIONALADMIN
(10%)
GENERALAVERAGERATING REMARKS
NO. SCORE(100)
RATINGS SCORE(100)
RATING SCORE(100)
RATINGS SCORE(100)
RATINGS SCORE(100)
RATING SCORE(100)
RATINGS
1 ABULENCIA, RICARDO C. 54 10.8% 58 11.6% 34 6.8% 65 9.75% 66 9.9% 50 5.0% 53.85%2 ALVAR, JOSEPH E. 70 14% 67 13.4% 36 7.2% 69 10.35% 58 8.7% 44 4.4% 58.05%3 BERJA, NATHANIEL P. 29 5.8% 46 9.2% 32 6.6% 48 7.2% 50 7.5% 44 4.4% 40.7%4 CANOSA, RICHARD L. 43 8.6% 36 7.2% 34 6.8% 50 7.5% 62 9.3% 34 3.4% 42.8%5 DONGIAPON, ROMIL F. 38 7.6% 38 7.6% 33 6.6% 46 6.9% 56 8.4% 44 4.4% 41.5%6 MONDAY, ALBON JUVY M. 42 8.4% 48 9.6% 32 6.4% 58 8.7% 49 7.4% 76 7.6% 48.1%7 SANTIAGO, ARIEL L. 23 4.6% 34 6.8% 25 5% 40 6% 37 5.6% 24 2.4% 30.4%8 UDTOJAN, JUNE JAVE M. 51 10.2% 55 11% 41 8.2% 68 10.2% 62 9.3% 54 5.4% 54.3%910
SCORING SYSTEM: SCORING IS BASED ON WEIGHT % PER SUBJECT AREA
Note: Each major area is subdivided into specific sub-areas of concerns as well as their corresponding description of scope and coverage based on Republic Act 6506, creating the board of criminology.
Prepared by: Rico T. Musong, R.C. Approved by: Crim. Faculty Elaine C. Azarcon, R.C., MSCRIM Dean, College of Criminology
