2015-16 MCA Data Discoveries - RRCNETgraphics/RRCMCA.pdf · 2016. 8. 31. · 2015-16 MCA Data...
Transcript of 2015-16 MCA Data Discoveries - RRCNETgraphics/RRCMCA.pdf · 2016. 8. 31. · 2015-16 MCA Data...
2015-16 MCA Data Discoveries
What does Minnesota think is important?
What do we want kids to do?
▪ Pass important tests “Be Proficient”
▪ Grow in their knowledge “Growth”
▪ Have equal opportunity to learn Close the “Achievement Gap”
▪ Graduate from high school “Graduation”
Minnesota believes each of the above things
are equally important so…
Because each of these things are equally important, they should be treated that way…
▪ Pieces of the MMR Pie for High Schools
Elementary and Middle Schools don’t graduate students so for them the pie looks like this…
▪ Pieces of the MMR Pie for Elementary and Junior High Schools
Focus Rating
Consists of:
▪ Focused Proficiency
▪ Achievement Gap Reduction
Title I schools can fall into 5 groups based on MMR and FR
• Reward Schools: These schools are the top 15 percent of Title I schools based on the MMR. They represent the highest-performing schools on the four domains in the MMR.
• Celebration Eligible: These are the 25 percent of schools directly below the Reward school
cutoff. These schools may apply to be Celebration schools, and MDE selects approximately 10 percent of Title I schools to receive the Celebration school recognition.
• Continuous Improvement: These are the bottom 25 percent of Title I schools that have not already been identified as Priority or Focus. Continuous Improvement schools must work with their districts to create and implement improvement plans as well as set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support school improvement efforts.
• Focus: All Minnesota schools receive a Focus Rating (FR) that measures their contribution to
the state’s achievement gap. The 10 percent of Title I schools with the lowest FR are identified as Focus Schools. Focus schools are required to set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support school improvement efforts. These schools are identified every three years. Some Focus schools are identified for persistent low graduation rates. These are schools with a six-year graduation rate, averaged over three years, below 60 percent. This separate group of low graduation rate
• Priority: These are the 5 percent most persistently low-performing Title I schools based on the
MMR. Priority schools are required to set aside 20 percent of Title I funds to support turnaround efforts, and these schools are also identified every three years.
Reading
Attention:
MCA III started in 2013 for 3rd-8th
grades & 10th grade
MCA Reading Results
We are over 12% above the state!!
2016 District Reading Proficiency
2016 RRC ELEMENTARY Reading Proficiency
2016 RRC SECONDARY Reading Proficiency
District Reading Proficiency Trends
Elementary Reading Proficiency Trends
Secondary/High School Reading Proficiency Trends
Student Group Reading Proficiency Data
• Looking at your demographics, is there a student-group that makes up a significant part of your student population?
RRC District SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data
RRC ELEMENTARY SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data
RRC SECONDARY SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data
RRC DISTRICT VS STATEWIDE SpEd Trend Data
RRC ELEMENTARY VS STATEWIDE SpEd Trend Data
RRC SECONDARY VS STATEWIDE SpEd Trend Data
RRC District FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data
RRC ELEMENTARY FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data
RRC SECONDARY FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data
RRC DISTRICT VS STATEWIDE FRP TREND DATE
RRC ELEMENTARY VS STATEWIDE FRP TREND DATE
RRC SECONDARY VS STATEWIDE FRP TREND DATE
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
8thGrade
10thGrade
Axis
Tit
le
Class of 2017 Cohort Reading Trend Data
District
State
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
7thGrade
8thGrade
10thGrade
Axis
Tit
le
Class of 2018 Cohort Reading Trend Data
District
State
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
6thGrade
7thGrade
8thGrade
10thGrade
Axis
Tit
le
Class of ___2019__ Cohort Reading Trend Data
District
State
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
5thGrade
6thGrade
7thGrade
8thGrade
10thGrade
Axis
Tit
le
Class of __2020___ Cohort Reading Trend Data
District
State
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
4thGrade
5thGrade
6thGrade
7thGrade
8thGrade
10thGrade
Axis
Tit
le
Class of __2021___ Cohort Reading Trend Data
District
State
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
3rdGrade
4thGrade
5thGrade
6thGrade
7thGrade
8thGrade
10thGrade
Axis
Tit
le
Class of ___2022__ Cohort Reading Trend Data
District
State
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
3rdGrade
4thGrade
5thGrade
6thGrade
7thGrade
8thGrade
10thGrade
Axis
Tit
le
Class of __2023___ Cohort Reading Trend Data
District
State
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 10th Grade
Axis
Title
Class of __2024___ Cohort Reading Trend Data
District State
Add Cohort trend data slides if you wish
• Cohort follows the same group of students from year to year.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 10th Grade
Axis
Title
Class of __2025___ Cohort Reading Trend Data
District State
3rd Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
4th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
5th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
6th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
7th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
8th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
10th Grade Reading Proficiency Trend Data
2013 MCA Reading Strand Data
5.4 5.4 4.9 4.9
5.6 5.8 6 5.6 5.5
4.9 5.3 5.5
5.9 6.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3rd Grade4th Grade5th Grade6th Grade7th Grade8th Grade 10thGrade
Literature
Inf Text
2014 MCA Reading Strand Data
5.9 5.6
5.3 5.3 5.2 5.7 5.9 6.0
5.7
5.0 5.3
5.0 5.5
5.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3rd Grade4th Grade5th Grade6th Grade7th Grade8th Grade 10thGrade
Literature
Inf Text
2015 MCA Reading Strand Data
5.2
5.9 5.6
5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8
5.2
6.3
5.3 5.1 4.9
5.5 5.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3rd Grade4th Grade5th Grade6th Grade7th Grade8th Grade 10thGrade
Literature
Inf Text
2016 MCA Reading Strand Data
5.38 4.85
5.39 5.48 5.54 5.75 5.69 5.6 5.3
5.1 5.4
5.9 5.5
5.8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3rd Grade4th Grade5th Grade6th Grade7th Grade8th Grade 10thGrade
Literature
Inf Text
Math
Attention:
MCA III’s started in:
• 2011 for 3rd-8th grades
• 2014 for 11th Grade
MCA Math results
We are 12% above the state!!
District Math Proficiency
2016 RRC ELEMENTARY Math Proficiency
2016 RRC SECONDARY Math Proficiency
District Math Proficiency Trends
District Math Proficiency Trends
Elementary Math Proficiency Trends
Secondary/High School Math Proficiency Trends
Examining Data - D.I.E. Protocol
• D: Describe
• I: Interpret
• E: Evaluate
Student Group Math Proficiency Data
• Looking at your demographics, is there a student-group that makes up a significant part of your student population?
SpEd vs. Non-SpEd Trend Data
FRP vs. non-FRP Trend Data
Class of 2017 Cohort Math trend
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade
District
State
Class of 2020 Cohort Math trend
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11thGrade
District
State
Class of 2021 Cohort Math trend
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade
District
State
Class of 2022 Cohort Math trend
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade
District
State
Class of 2023 Cohort Math trend
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade
District
State
Class of 2024 Cohort Math trend
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade
District
State
Class of 2025 Cohort Math trend
68.00%
69.00%
70.00%
71.00%
72.00%
73.00%
74.00%
75.00%
76.00%
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade
District
State
3rd Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
4th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
5th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
6th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
7th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
8th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
11th Grade Math Proficiency Trend Data
2016 MCA Math Strand Data
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade
Number & Operation
Algebra
Geometry & Measurement
Data Analysis
District Science Proficiency
RRC 5th grade Science Proficiency
RRC 8th grade Science Proficiency
RRC 10th grade Science Proficiency
District Science Proficiency Trends
MCA Science 5-year Trend
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Grade 5
Grade 8
Grade 10
MCA Science grades 5, 8 & 10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Grade 5
Grade 8
Grade 10
5th grade Science Proficiency Trends
8th grade Science Proficiency Trends
10th grade Science Proficiency Trends