2015-05-13 Pinto II: Who is corrupt? Rabbi Pinto, Judge Mudrick, or both? // פרשת פינטו 2:...

8/9/2019 2015-05-13 Pinto II: Who is corrupt? Rabbi Pinto, Judge Mudrick, or both? // מושחת? הרב פינטו, השופט מודריק, או שניהם…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2015-05-13-pinto-ii-who-is-corrupt-rabbi-pinto-judge-mudrick-or-both- 1/11

Human Rights Alert (NGO) האדלזכ י Joseph Zernik, PhD ד"ר וסף צרנPO Box 3340, !e #$i$, %sr&e *"'3340("' ,)*3330ד+&x 0-3*.*/) 1&i 2osephernik5hr&-n6oor6

70*8-08-*3 Pinto II: Who is corrupt? Rabbi Pinto, Judge Mudrick, or both?!he Pin9o s:&n;& is one o< 9he =ors9 :orr>p9ion s:&n;&s in re:en9 ?e&rs !he ;ei@er&9e?per$er9e; re:or;s &n; ;eni& o< p>@i: &::ess 9o inspe:9 9he re:or;s in 9his prose:>9ion in 9he!e-#$i$ Dis9ri:9 Ao>r9 &6&in ;o:>1en9 9h&9 :orr>p9ion o< 9he 2>;6es is :en9r& :&>se o< 9hesi9>&9ion in %sr&e 9o;&?

פינ

!"פ

7י

#$פ

%!

#$C פינ

&"$,'י

"(

#פ

!$,)$ני

! *C'ונור(E F נ GE HG 'ורוIE 'ו' GE 'ו GרI '( ( E נKו 'Gר,F L HEEו F M'LE GוM G

F M'LM Nו E ' נ IוME KGIE ' MM ' H HE E M'(רI ("' וIF F KוGE 'ו' GG ,MוGFו E H(רG M MצIH LרI FרוQ ( E

R+$ י"&-S

Figure: Rabbi Pinto and senior police officers Arbiv and Bracha - main figures in the scandal. Pinto's attorneys warned that Pinto's prosecution would cause embarrassment to the justice system... Judge Oded Mudrick of theTel-Aviv District Court - both the purported conviction, and the purported sentencing records fails to be enteredin Net-HaMishpat (IT system of the Court), a widely reported sentencing hearing "did not take place", and thereading of the sentence was in a hearing that both took place and did not take place...____

OccupyTLV, May 13 - newspaper headlines today announce that Tel-Aviv District Court Jude OdedMudric! yesterday sentenced "a##i $into to one year in prison in one o% the worst corruption scandalsin &srael's history( Accordin to a letter %ro) *+ Attorney eneral Loretta Lynch, .& in%or)ed senior&sraeli /ustice o%%icials already several years ao that "a##i $into #ri#ed the )ost senior &srael $olice

o%%icers((( [1]

Accordin to )edia, Jude Mudric! announced yesterday in open court, durin sentencin hearin, that$into was 0corrupt and corruptin0((( owever, closer review o% the %acts in this )atter )ust raise concerns that Jude Mudric! is corrupt tono lesser deree - creatin deli#erately perverted court records in a case o% the hihest pu#lic policy

1/11



sini%icance2 Jude Mudric! is hidin the conviction and sentencin records i% they e4ist5, createdduplicitous calendar data, %ails to correct the %alse records, even a%ter iven notice, and denies the rihtto inspect court records( Co)#ined - these are the hall)ar!s o% /udicial corruption and seriousviolations o% u)an "ihts(

The May 12, 2015 Sentencing record appears neither among Decisions, nor among Judgments

6esterday, Jude Mudric! continued to create vaue and a)#iuous litiation records(

"eview o% 7et-aMishpat &T syste) o% the Court5 %ails to unveil the May 18, 891: sentencin recordeither a)on Decisions, or a)on Jud)ents(

iure2 Decisions Doc!et - as seen on May 13, 891:, %ails to list the May 18 sentencin record

2/11



iure2 Jud)ents Doc!et - as seen on May 13, 891: - ;7o details %ound< - %ails to list the May 18 sentencin record(

========

The reistration o% /ud)ents without any delay is one o% the %unda)entals o% Due $rocess( And)issin /udicial records, particularly /ud)ent records, is a hall)ar! o% /udicial corruption(

Did the May 12, 2015 Sentencing hearing take pace, or didn!t it"

The latest decision in the Decisions Doc!et is a May 19, 891: Decision #y Jude Mudric!, statin thatthe May 18, 891: sentencin hearin, widely reported #y )edia today, was cancelled(

#/11



iure2 May 19, 891: Decision, statin that the May 18, 891: sentencin hearin was canceled(

========

At the sa)e ti)e, the case calendar shows that the May 19, 891: sentencin hearin did ta!e place, andthat a protocol was enerated((( #ut the protocol %ails to appear a)on court records in the doc!et(

$/11



iure2 The Case Calendar on May 13, 891: shows that the May 18, 891: +entencin earin did ta!e place, and a protocol

was enerated( owever, the May 18, 891: $rotocol %ails to appear in the Decisions Doc!et(

========

&n other cases, &sraeli /udes were docu)ented to conduct 0uno%%icial0, 0o%% the record0 hearins, withno !nowlede o% those present( +uch conduct should #e dee)ed raud *pon the Court(

The creation o% vaue and a)#iuous litiation records, particularly in a cri)inal process, is also aserious violation o% u)an "ihts, and aain - a hall)ar! o% /udicial corruption(

Judge Mudrick %ais to correct missing con&iction record and contradictory data regarding apre&ious sentencing hearing, e&en a%ter recei&ing a notice'

On May 3, 891: 7otice and "e>uest were %iled with Jude Mudric!, reardin erroneous records in$into's prosecution(

7o response has #een received yet %ro) Jude Oded Mudric! on the May 3, 891: 7otice o% pro#a#ly)issin?erroneous court %ile reistrations and "e>uest %or correction' [$]

The 7otice and "e>uest re%er to two records in the court %ile2

a( The )pri 1$, 2015 *erdict +on&iction( record2

$into's conviction was widely reported #y )edia( owever, the conviction record is )issin %ro) #oththe ;Decisions< and the ;Jud)ents< doc!ets( Missin court records, particularly /ud)ent records, aretypical o% corrupt courts(

5/11



Figure: On April 29, 2015, a total of seven (7) decisions were listed in the case, which by now should hold around30 decisions. The decision records, which are posted in the public access system, include decisions on postponinghearing dates, changing defense counsel, and Defendant's access to evidence. Missing from the public accesssystem are any hearing protocol, any decision pertaining to the evidence in this case, and any record of theconviction, reported by media to have taken place in a hearing on April 14, 2015. This court file and many othersdemonstrate that in the courts' new IT system, Net-HaMishpat, judges routinely maintain double-books for casedockets. ====

-( The )pri 2., 2015 sentencing hearing2

The hearin was e4tensively reported #y )edia( owever, in 7et-aMishpat &T syste) o% the Court5the hearin is listed, ;Did not ta!e place<, in the Court Calendar( The Case Calendar, li!ewise, showsthat the hearin was postponed(&n other cases, it has #een docu)ented that &sraeli /udes conduct ;uno%%icial hearins<, o%% the recordsi)ulated hearins5, while the pu#lic and parties are under the i)pression that they are witnessin alaw%ul, e%%ectual court hearin(

/11



Figure: On April 29, 2015, the Court Calendar showed that the April 28, 2015 sentencing hearing, which wasextensively reported by media, "Did not take place". Also in other cases, it has been documented that the CourtCalendar in Net-HaMishpat is unreliable, and judges may conduct "unofficial hearings", while the public andparties are under the impression that they are witnessing a lawful, binding court hearing._______

Jude Mudric!'s %ailure to correct the %alse data, even a%ter notice was iven and re>uest %or correctionwas %iled, is clear evidence that the vaue and a)#iuous records are not the outco)e o% 0hu)anerror0, #ut the outco)e o% Jude Mudric!'s deli#erate conduct(

Judge Mudrick maintains dou-e -ooks %or Decisions Docket in this case

.eyond the )issin conviction record, and the 0did not ta!e place0 sentencin hearin, it is o#viousthat Jude Mudric! runs in this case dou#le #oo!s %or the 0Decisions Doc!et02 On April 8@, 891:, onlyseven 5 decision records were listed today in the online pu#lic access syste), in a case that should #ynow hold at least a couple doBen decision records(The records, which are posted in the pu#lic access syste), include decisions on postponin hearindates, chanin de%ense counsel, and De%endant's access to evidence( Missin %ro) the pu#lic accesssyste) are any hearin protocols, and any decisions pertainin to the evidence in this case(The )aintenance o% dou#le-#oo!s %or Decision Doc!ets is not uni>ue to this court %ile, #ut the pattern

is particularly #latant in cases that are related to corruption o% overn)ent aencies(

Judge Mudrick denies the right to inspect court records in this case a onstitutiona ight,%undamenta principe o% a democratic regime, and a %undamenta 3uman ight'

On May 19, Dr erni! %iled in the Tel-Aviv District Court "epeat "e>uest to &nspect the court %ile inthe $into case, where the evidence shows perversion o% /ustice #y Jude Oded Mudric!( [2] The new

4/11



re>uest as!s to inspect only the electronic records in this case, in order to avoid 0#urdenin0 the court(&nspection o% the electronic records only re>uires providin access throuh the ter)inal in the O%%ice o%the Cler!(((

A previous "e>uest %or &nspection, which was %iled on April 8@, 891:, as!ed to inspect all electronicand paper records in this court %ile( [#] owever, a letter, dated April 39, 891:, received #y )ail %ro)

the court and purportin to #e a decision #y Jude Mudric!, denied the "e>uest to &nspect the court%ile(

iure2 An unsined, unauthenticated note, which %ails to #e reistered in the 0Decisions Doc!et0, was received #y )ail

%ro) the Court( &t purports to #e a decision denyin the riht to inspect the court %ile - accordin to the &sraeli +upre)e

Court 0a %unda)ental principle o% a de)ocratic rei)e0 and 0a constitutional riht0(

======== The letter says2

The trial is not over yet(

4ercisin the riht to inspect the court %ile at this stae would heavily #urden the /udicial wor!(+ince the "e>uest is /usti%ied #y a research purpose, & do not %ind roo) to rant it at this stae(ollowin co)pletion o% the trial, it would #e possi#le to %ile the re>uest aain(

The April 39, 891: letter was received unsined, unauthenticated, and it %ails to #e listed in the0Decisions Doc!et0 o% the electronic pu#lic access syste) o% the Court 7et-aMishpat5( +uch recordcannot #e dee)ed #y a reasona#le person a valid court record(

+eparately, re>uest was %iled on May 19, %or a sined and authenticated copy o% the April 39, 891:letter #y Jude Mudric!( $revious e4perience in such situations in the &sraeli courts in recent yearsshows that the chances to o#tain a law%ully sined and authenticated copy o% the record are null(

Serious &ioations o% 3uman ights, and conduct that %its tri-unas o% a miitary dictatorship

The riht to inspect court %iles was declared #y the &sraeli +upre)e Court 0a %unda)ental principle in ade)ocratic rei)e0, and 0a constitutional riht0( &t is also inherent to the %unda)ental u)an "iht%or %air, pu#lic hearin, particularly in cri)inal proceedins( owever, as docu)ented in onoinresearch survey, &sraeli /udes today deny the riht to inspect court records, particularly in cri)inal

./11



prosecutions related to overn)ent corruption scandals(Conditions have #een esta#lished in the &sraeli courts, such that the pu#lic is denied the riht to accesscourt records which show2 what a person was indicted on, was a person was convicted o%, what aperson's verdict is, and that a person is held in prison pursuant to law%ully )ade arrest warrants( +uchconditions are typical o% tri#unals o% a )ilitary dictatorship, #ut not o% courts o% a civil society(

The into scanda is one o% the 6orst in recent years, documenting deep corruption o% the higheste&es o% the 7ustice and a6 en%orcement systems

$into is on trial %or atte)ptin to #ri#e &srael $olice .riadier eneral phrai) .racha, ead o% the7ational raud *nit( &n his investiation, $into provided incri)inatin evidence reardin Ma/oreneral Menashe Ar#iv, ead o% Lahav E33, the )ain investiative unit o% the &srael $olice, popularly!nown as the &sraeli .&( $into clai)s that he also holds incri)inatin evidence aainst the &srael$olice .riadier eneral phrai) .racha, ead o% the 7ational raud *nit( &t is )ost li!ely the worsto% the corruption scandals in the &srael police, which have roc!ed its top co))and in recent years( 8idespread denia o% the right to inspect court %ies is typica o% the 9sraei courts today particuary in cases reated to go&ernment corruption'''

The "e>uest to &nspect the $into court %ile in the Tel-Aviv District Court was %iled as part o% a study o%access to court %iles in the +tate o% &srael, %ollowin )a/or chanes in ad)inistration o% the courts overthe past decade(Fhile the &sraeli courts repeatedly declared that pu#lic access to court %iles is a 0#asic principle o% ade)ocratic rei)e0, e4perience so %ar indicates that the courts routinely deny pu#lic access to court%iles( The denial o% access and the perversion o% court records are particularly #latant in cases relatedto corruption o% overn)ent aencies($u#lic access to court records is !nown %or centuries as the %unda)ental way to sa%euard the interityo% the courts, and a#sent pu#lic access to court records it is i)possi#le to )aintain the interity o% thecourts(The evidence points to corruption o% the /udiciary as central to conditions in the +tate o% &srael today(

Where are the media and law professors?

Given the historic significance of the Rabbi Pinto corruption scandal, the case generatedunparalleled coverage by media and legal experts.

And yet, none of the professional legal reporters and law professors, who extensively coveredthe case, noticed the massive perversion of court records? ====

פינ

!"פ

7 פ

!$י

(י

- )י

.י

$ !

&י

!

"&

/# י

*"'י

"(

# ((

-'ונור(E F נ GE HG 'ורוIE 'ו' GE 'ו GרI '( ( E נKו 'Gר' MM ' H HE E M'EFו E H(רG M MצIH LרI FרוQ ( E F KוGE 'ו' GG ,MוG E(רI ("' וIE KGIE

:/11



בפרש :תמו יות זשכרמ תוי ומד ם כרבו יב ברא ירים כב רטשמ וקצי י פי טו פי טו ז יר .רב של ין ד יכרוע

למבוכ למערכ ו מרגי ו ט יפ ים גד י לי לפ ים כי ל ש... יזוחמ טפשמ תיבמ מודריק עודד מצביעו-א"שופט ראיות

וי פרש סי כל ים כי ל שובי שב עוסק ש וא כך .על

___

/'י"נKו MרE HG )' ד נו IE KGIE ' MIוQ ("' ר Iודר וGEG Fו Kודד E 'וודI 'רוG 'EGEGו Kודד ' I GG EHI E 'M F M'LEור ד M FHו( ו'ו' G H ר LEו רס(I EנGH

'ו (H 'GוI Iודר•N ד E Iו N M ס נו ( NLו ,'וKHEE N M וI נו ( HוI'(I N ד E Q M'Lר

•N ד E ס IוKHEE N M ו' )ו נו ד E FQ ,Nו) ) E 'רLE M'L

•Fו I , 'M EIוGרE Eנור(E EKHEE*0, (IH70*8HKוM HוI'( Nו דEG 'רIו( ,

•"F 'E (H"L FוGר ,'רוG 'M EMרEM וודG ,N ד E ודQ H Fר Nו ד

•(H FQ ,F רס E F M'LE '( FGר (Hו F MוLE F IוG ר E '( N ' (H Iודר GEו KודדE 'M F IוG ר Eו F M'LE Nו 'H EG Mו EדוE (H EGQוEG

•E 'M Nו ר 'EH MרסI Iודר KGIMר דIו רGETH " Kו Kודד סוד ו ' '", " 'וL"Nו HE KGIE ' M

ו( FEM Nסור, Eו) EרI EורL HG Eו ו' EGו ,EנווLM F GMוGI F M'LE FEM F H H F L HE HוE נ

MIוו NQוE U HEH Fד(EHד H( 'נLוE EIM Nו)( FGדE EIM ,FורQ EI ,Gר צ Mור H N' נ (H IצM Mו צרו H(רG M F KוGE

HG F HנוM ר K F I(ו' EH( F (נ' N ד L Gו (Iסר צו HG ד נו, וE F(Eו) IוE ' MM סוEר'נ ו'I ' ר( EרM HG KGI 'M (H U( ,' (Mצ EרוKK ד

F רוס ורEו F סונ IE F KGIE F M'LEG N I(EH EG ,E 'M MרE 'רוG 'E N נ E (Hור ודר I GEו Kודד ד H E 'M F L HEEו F M'LE HG F נוו LIE F GוM GH MH IG (H F KGIHו

H(רG Iד נ' וEו H ,NQו נ ' KGI E HEנ'I Gור' H EL GIIדווH (L ו 'E FHו(

0I123:S*R 70*8-08-0) !he V&@@&is9 &n; #W Xore99& X?n:h, Op;Ye=s:o1h99p===ope;ne=s:o1&r9i:es!he-V&@@&is9-&n;-#W-Xore9-@?-Joseph-Zernik-Wo$ern1en9-Aorr>p9ion[%s-r&e[J>;i:i&-Aorr>p9ion[Xore99&-X?n:h-*8080)-/7.h91

S7R 70*8-08-*0 State of Israel v Pinto \4338-0.-*4] in 9he !e-#$i$ Dis9ri:9 Ao>r9 T Dr Zernik^s _epe&9 _e`>es9\a7] 9o %nspe:9 Ao>r9 +ie

]ו

Kנ

נ

H(ר

G

'ד נ

I4338-0.-*4^ס

I]ו

'G

M T ("' ו

IE KGIE '

MM \7

'M N

Hצרנ

^דר

HG 'ר

ו

E \h99ps===s:ri@;:o1;o:7)4/7*34S3R 70*8-04-7. State of Israel v Pinto \4338-0.-*4] in 9he !e-#$i$ Dis9ri:9 Ao>r9 T Dr Zernik^s _e`>es9 \a78] 9o%nspe:9 :o>r9 <ie

]ו

Kנ

נ

H(ר

G

'ד נ

I4338-0.-*4^ס

I]ו

'G

M T ("' ו

IE KGIE '

MM \78

'M Nו

Hצרנ

^דר

HG \h99ps===s:ri@;:o1;o:7)38*)0

10/11

http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Kabbalist-and-AG-Loret-by-Joseph-Zernik-Government-Corruption_Israel_Judicial-Corruption_Loretta-Lynch-150506-829.html


https://www.scribd.com/doc/264821734/








S4R 70*8-08-03 State of Israel v Pinto \4338-0.-*4] in 9he !e-#$i$ Dis9ri:9 Ao>r9 T Dr Zernik^s Yo9i:e \a78] o<pro@&@? 1issin6erroneo>s :o>r9 <ie re6is9r&9ions

]ו

Kנ

נ

H(ר

G

'ד נ

I4338-0.-*4^ס

I]ו

'וד

E T ("' ו

IE KGIE '

MM \78F

Iו

Gר

Hצרנ

^דר

HG \E(

נר

E HLL Fו

QGFסר

h99ps===s:ri@;:o1;o:7)4*43*0

11/11



2015-05-13 Pinto II: Who is corrupt? Rabbi Pinto, Judge Mudrick, or both? // פרשת פינטו 2:...

Documents

Transcript of 2015-05-13 Pinto II: Who is corrupt? Rabbi Pinto, Judge Mudrick, or both? // פרשת פינטו 2:...