20141028 - Va Passcode Decision (1)

8/10/2019 20141028 - Va Passcode Decision (1)

1/5

CM10LH OF VRGINA

\ , J BO IVL K

H M '

CW

S FCO J

October 28, 20

Eenor ae Eqiec o te oonweath ttorney2 No Parkwaying 1, Secon FoorVrina eah V 56

ae occoett, ErZoby, Boccoetti & Norme 66 Stney Pont SotNo, V

R: Comnwealth Virgini David arles BaustDck N.: R14-39

ea one

C COT UDE ICTY O

D BLG


2/5

Re: Comonwealth of Virgna David Caes BautDockt No. CR14-439

October 28, 204Page 2 o 5

s dvs n out pnt ongn o fndn fndnt ot d to s t n tt o onntd to fndnts l on "oud v possy odd t assat and t

din my ist on t o. Adtoly, t stimony bo t ot t viti ws tat t dv oud v odd assault a to rmy b a ording. ntry t t pon s bn vntd by o t pssod o fingpint.

T quston fo t t s wr t odution o os as fngpint is tstimonial omnatio nd tfo subjt o t dfats itAmndmnt privilg inst sfimintin. T omonw agus at tpassd ad t ngpnt not tstimonl bs t xist of oiis a "ogo olusion. fs Counsl agus tat bot ar ttmonia at

t would provid ass to al rodings or itms on Dfdats pho.

y

T Fi Ammnt t t Constitution of t Unitd Stats ovs tt oson "sal b omld i y iinal as to b a wtnss agast hs. U.Const mnd V [] Fotnt Amndmnt ss agaist stt vsio t prvig tt t Fift Andnt guants gist dra nrgt - tight o pson t mi sit unlss ooss to pa t nftd isof is own will Schmerber v Cal. 3 U.. 5 , 60 1966) tat ot). "[T]piilg pos an ausd oly om bing ompd to tsty aans ims oowis provd t Stat t idn o a tstionial or ommt tu. Wad 3 U.S. 1, 1 196 itatio oittd). Tus po ii

qirs t out o solv tr grantig t moto to opl "woud ur 1opsio o a ) tstimol ommuniaton tat is 3) rimi S. vAutement, 60 F.d 19, 111 n. 1 5t ir 199)

t is a "sttld popositon tt a prson my b qird to odu spdoumnts v tog ty ota inriminating asstions o fa bf st ration o tos doumts ws not 'opld wt t ai o h vg[agnst snrmintion. Uied tates v. Hbbe 53 U.S. 5 000)acor Fiser nited Sta 5 U.S. 31, 0 96) "[T] F merotts against 'mpl s-nrimnatio, not t dis vfomatio). Tu t ontnts of t on, btnd usant to a

waa a only sbt to objtions raisd ndr t F Amendm ot t fAmendmen dditioay, t is no qustio tat a moto to ol s opsand t podution o t pass o fgprint woul iniminatg T anayss

tuns on wtr a pssod o ngint is "tstmol omunito.

Inimnain has een f a "y ha he ines easonaby beiee a imina posecion l ea he ee ha mh s Kg s 406 1, 45 (1972).


3/5

R: Coeat g v. Da ae Batct No 14139

Oct 28 20age o 5

P

"An act itestimonia wen theccused is forcdo revea i klg o acsreatng hm to te oen o fo hvin to shae thoug an e te

goenent . v Kircnr 823 upp. 2d 665 668 2010) (iin v Doe 48 U.S 20 22 (187). T]hee a gniant derene been e eof compuson to extt commnctons fo a defennt nd comeg en o

enage in ondut that may be incriinating." H, 50 USat 3 [T]e privlegeoe no protection agant omuson to ubmt to fngerpntng oo rmeauement to te or eak for dentification to appea in co s ou tance t wlk o to make a partcu getue. 8 U 22."en thog the act may vde ncinatng evdence a crinal s bemeled to t n shit t poide a bod ample or andwitn tomke a ecng f voice. he act of exhtng su pycal hracic nt

te sme as a swon cmmuncation by wtness tat reates ethe exp ledaseion ofact orbelef." Hubbel, 530 US.at 35.

te ct of rotio tef col uaf s tesonial f e eexistence poseo and nto and auteticit of the docme ed toncimint [hi o e. nted tate oe n e Gran J Spna Dm), 67 F.d 1 343 11th C. 2012 (cting hodng of Fiev i Sts 2 .S. 1; 4 (1976). evertele "[w]hen the 'existene nd oca f thedoumens une oena ae 'fregne concusn an the ine ie ntn t e m tl of h Government nfrmton conen h he i t

ha he document then n Ffth mendment ght s touched ease the sn t o testny t srede. oe nie tae (I J Spon)18 F3d 905 91 (t Cr. 24 (ing e 425 U.. at 41 "[T]he ee sin w elying n te 'tuttellin of te [witnes o prove the eisence f r hisace to te cen. ie 42 . at 4. "heter tec fent is a frene onluion i a uetin of fct ject to view eer. nied aes v. Noood 420 F3d 888 85 8t C 2005) it edtate v Doe 42 U 605 6314 (984)).

eere in H e Curt found the acin of prodi iesns a subea wa tesmon n ntur and th subjc t

cnttutona pvege againt elf-nciminaton. Hub, 530 . t 0. e uwa persuaded y th ct that n the act o prodcton the reponden d to thmenal nd cal tep ncsay to provide th posecuto w ccinenor o the mny ouc of potentiay incimnting evdenc hpoen Id. a 42 Te Ct resoned that gven t nfoaton bJ pondcment in cmpnce wt a supoena the wtne oud adm erx wr i s rl n e aeti. oe e wnes} repnd the uena e ma e comed to ke h e san


4/5

Commnwalt f igia David Cas Bauoet o: CR443

c 8, 2014Pge 4 of 5

a sr wr proc vrig ma h . Ia 7 T r o b a sbna ig prs"a a ocms r m i bvis e rcur

spns ssisac ini pni surcs irai n prs srcs o inormain. I . Thror n ponn pres ocmns i rs sbpona i was "ncia qivan prparo o an answr ih a ai wrin irroga a ri oaqins a iscvr piio. I. 2. "T asm hs cm

was ik in a inisi combinaion o a wa a n i bi r surrnr h k a srgo. urhr h bb ur ou h "orgcousio docri i n ap in is case were h Gen ha n nha i an rior knowg o ir eisc or h whraou o h 20pags o ocums uima prduce b respen. I. a .

imiar i h con o ompig h proci a a SDsrct ou e Easrn sric o Michiga he at cpeing e ena prov a passwor i a sini cmmunicai. ied a Kicne 2 F.upp. 2 66 669 (E.D Mic. 0. Th cour rsone ocn he De rea e passwr . rqirs a o cmmicae 'oege nik hprcion a hanwriin ape or a voic empar. Id ! i e 'oio onraio ro e acce e amp r im 'iscs ons iown min ha pcaes h e-cimnaio lae" Id (quoig ited a oe 87 U.. a (empasis i origina). he cou un He' iincbeeen eing an inquisior h obinaio a wa sa a urering o atrogbo insructiv. Id iiar o havig o iuge he cmai a sae

cou resond "he ovrnn is no seein cmen r s i is gtestimon rom he Dena euiri i iug rugh i ea procse_passor. d; acd n e a en Boc o. :06-mj 207.. Dis. LEXI 879 at * 207 WL 426 (D. V v. 29 2007 c

overnmn is ti cm the prucio e paso ie h rgconcusio ocrin canot a. he asswr is not a ia ig. I Bocrnows te passwor i on s i his mi..

I i cas Dean cao be cmpe o roc i passco oaccss his smarpn bt h cn b compe o pruce igerrn o ham. Te oage ise w t e pce unr e Fh nm c

creio was voua i. no cp. a boe h h ende roecs gais cop -iciminaion herere h coen o Denns

2 However, on appeal, the Distict Cou fo the Distit of Vemon fnd tat eqing Defendan topodce an nencped esion of t dments n is enypted had de tat he ad aeadypode access o eiosy as n testona becase te existence of and catin of tedoens e "fee oncsn n re Gad Ju ubpo o Buch, 20 US Di EXI306 a *8, 2009 WL 28 D Vt Fe 9, 2009.


5/5

monwalt of Vigiia v i Cal Bautockt No CR-9

cb 2, 20age 5 of 5

pho, atd votay, a not prottd agant dsos ov, opngndat to povd a togh hs ssd s th oped ad testoand tho poteted Cotary to th onath ato, te psod

t a oegone ouo ae t s nt knon utside o eat d Unk adocumt o tagle thg, h a an nnypted opy o the otag t, thepaod a a ogon onusn

, te omoneath od ot ned to ce

Deedt o podue it a thy old lady kn it asod KrerDedat anot b copll to "dvge thogh hs tal ose the pasodo etry he gpt, k a y, hovr, do not eue the tns to dganythng hough h metl o On th conty, k phal aatst

hat ae nonttimoial, the fingnt f endat sed to ac h pho kse notetoal an dos n eie Dendat to "ommnat ayknoed at ll. Ulk th odton hcal haractiti vdn, h as a

inerprint, t oction of a asod ores the Dfndat o dlose the ontt

f n nd o th eao the otion t ompe he pacod shoud b DENIDbut te oton t copl the fngpnt shold be GRATD.

Unencpted Ftage

eh as th Cooeath sk p the unyted ded. oeve o th tstony o the itns at the haring, th ten adloi of the rerding ot a fegone cnclon ad openg Deendat toprdc n unenrypted son od b selniiatg Th most theoona kno that h eodng "ould s bcae the dev " harecded te aaul and tatted t o the phon The alte alo t, tha

te dev "a n ave eded e asalt and he cord "ay not eit Thbeig th only rean te oonelth pts the ay be a cod, the

itne and locatn o t coding s not a fogon onclson Dnapodct f he nnrypted odng oud be tetoal bcaue Dndant odbe ain the rerdng et, it as n hi posso ad onto, and th tcring auent here, th Comonealth d not compl Dendat oproce an unecryptd eon of the eodg

SCF/ag/nc stn ciPdin dg

20141028 - Va Passcode Decision (1)

Documents

Transcript of 20141028 - Va Passcode Decision (1)