Cooperative

Extension Service

Nelson County

317 S. Third Street

Bardstown, KY 40004

(502) 348-9204

Fax: (502) 348-9270

http://nelson.ca.uky.edu

Upcoming Events Nov 20—8:00 AM-6:00 PM Nelson County Extension Office Beef Check-off Referendum

Nov 24—9:30 AM-3:30 PM Fayette County Extension Office Managing Beef Cattle in Confinement Conference*

Nov 25—1:30 PM Hardin County Extension Office Farm Bill Workshop*

Dec 4 - Nelson County Extension Office 6:00 PM – Beef Quality Assurance Certification*

Dec 5 - Nelson County Extension Office 10:00 AM – Beef Quality Assurance Certification*

Dec 5 - Nelson County Extension Office 1:30 PM – Cattle Handling and Care Certification*

Dec 8 - Nelson County Extension Office 6:00 PM – Cattle Handling and Care Certification*

Dec 10—8:00 AM Hardin County Extension Office Early Bird Meeting*

Dec 15—Agritourism Workshop, Elizabethtown*

*Meets CAIP Educational Requirement

Ron Bowman County Extension Agent

for Agriculture/Natural Resources

RON’S RUMBLES

Another crop year is almost behind us. While it wasn’t as good as last year it was still a pretty good year. Weather was a little more variable than last year and costs us some yield in some areas of the county, especially the Holy Cross area. Pastures got a little thin in early fall but have come back nicely. Overall most folks should have enough hay and pasture to make it through the winter. Livestock prices are still holding pretty good although hog prices have started slipping the last month. The Central Ky Premiere Heifer Sale a couple of weeks ago averaged a little over $2,600.

Major Change Please Read

For many years the Soil Conservation District has paid for soil, forage and animal waste testing. That has been a tremendous service for our

2

producers. Because of budgetary restraints they will no longer be able to provide this service. Effective immediately soil tests will be $5 and the other tests will be on a cost basis.

Notice the “Calendar of Events” on the previous page and meeting announcements inside. Several of you still need to attend an educa-tional meeting to meet the educational component requirements of the County Agriculture Investment Program (CAIP). There will be more opportunities as winter gets here and we get into the normal meeting season. Also there will be a “Bovine Animal Referendum” at my office on November 20th (See article inside).

If I can be of help give me a call.

Creep Grazing

Getting beef calves to gain weight as efficient as possible is every producer’s goal, and creep feeding calves can help achieve that. Two main types of creep systems are used; creep grazing and creep feed-ing a concentrate-based supplement. Creep grazing pastures can add pounds to a calf’s weaning weight. In creep grazing, nursing calves either graze fields before the cows, getting first choice of the more luscious, higher quality pasture, or they have access to different pastures that cows cannot graze.

Creep grazing is generally less expensive than creep feeding grain, requiring less labor and being more convenient. The actual stocking density will depend on the land production potential, forage type, fer-tility, and season. Calves 3 to 4 months of age are less dependent on the cow for milk and high quality forage provides a substantial per-centage of their nutrients.

Creep grazing can be accomplished by allowing access to a special pasture through an opening large enough for calves, but too small for cows to get through. These gates generally range from 15 to 18 inch-es in width and 36 to 42 inches in height. A special pasture with high quality forage can be set aside strictly for this purpose. When starting to creep graze, it may be helpful to allow both cows and calves into the special pasture for a short period of time. The calves will return to the high quality forage after cows have been removed due to their growing independence and natural curiosity.

Another method often used is to position an electric fence high enough (36 to 42 inches) for calves to pass under while still deterring

3

cows from jumping over or going under. This method works well in a rotational grazing system where the calves can advance to an adjacent paddock under the fence where forages are higher quali-ty before rotating the cows to that paddock.

The type of forage or forage combinations that are best suited for creep grazing will vary depending on the season and weather con-ditions. Summer annuals can be established in tillable areas. Mil-let, sudangrass, and sorghum-sudangrass hybrids grow rapidly and produce high quality forage in a short amount of time and are best grazed from July to September. Forages, such as alfalfa and red clover, can be used in creep grazing from April until Septem-ber 15th and then from November on into winter. Small grains such as oats, wheat, rye and triticale can be used during October and November and again in early spring for winter hardy varieties. Annual ryegrass is best grazed from March until May.

Creep grazing calves is an effective way to help increase weaning weights and is generally less expensive than creep feeding. How-ever, creep feeding grain might be an economical option for many this year due to lower grain prices and dry conditions throughout the state. Contact your local extension agent about what could work best for your operation, and the steps you could take to uti-lize creep grazing in the future.

Weaning Calves on Pasture Beef calves often experience stress during the time of weaning, and limiting this stress can help daily gain. Four main types of stress affect calves: physical, environmental, nutritional, and so-cial. These issues can be avoided or at least minimized with prop-er calf management and planning.

Physical stress can occur during long periods of standing in work-ing facilities, mishandling in the working chute, hauling to weaning facility, etc. Castration and/or dehorning can also increase the lev-el of stress experienced at weaning if these processes occur at weaning time. Castration at birth and vaccinating before weaning will help decrease this stress.

Another form of stress is environmental, which can be either man-made or climatic. The weaning pen is the main human-induced environmental stress. Transferring calves from a clean pasture to a dry-lot can add stress as they are not familiar with these new surroundings. Also, moving calves to a dusty dry-lot where they

4

walk around in a confined space turning up dust can cause respir-atory problems and decreased weight gain. Climatic issues such as rain, ice, and snow are out of our control, but we can try to plan weaning time to avoid these conditions. Social stress is the remov-al of the calf from its mother. This is inevitable when weaning, but the amount of stress can be decreased by using cross-fence weaning.

The cross fence weaning method is where the calves are separat-ed from the cows by a good fence that will keep them apart. Re-maining in “nose to nose” contact with the cow keeps calves calm-er and separation is not such a large factor. This can be effective even with a small distance between the cows and calves, but where they are still able to see each other.

Nutritional stress occurs when calves are changed from a milk and pasture diet to a stored forage and grain diet. Having high quality pasture available to calves at weaning time is important both in the spring and fall. For fall weaning, calves can graze fields cut for hay which are beginning to regrow, or stockpiled fescue fields. Pas-tures used for fall weaning should be grazed or clipped between mid-August and mid-September to allow enough time for regrowth. For spring-weaned calves, vegetative-growth provides an excellent quality forage as long as the grasses are maintained and not grazed too young or too mature. Grasses will generally start vege-tative regrowth in April and May when temperatures begin to get warmer. Recommendations are to turn calves into a pasture when grasses are 8-12 inches tall and graze until grasses are 3-4 inch-es.

Pasture weaning offers a low-stress alternative to the conventional dry-lot weaning programs. Pasture weaning reduces the environ-mental and nutritional stress because calves are accustomed to pasture and the diet does not change. Demonstrations have shown that calves weaned on pasture and supplemented gain more weight than calves that are weaned in a dry-lot. New Mexico researchers reported that calves weaned on pasture had daily gains of 1.57 lb./day while drylot weaned calves gained 0.95 lb./day during the first 3 weeks post-weaning. The advantage was lost at the end of the 42-45 day backgrounding period. University of Kentucky Beef Specialist, Jeff Lehmkuhler, conducted a field demonstration with two different herds. One herd was weaned on pasture with supplement while a second herd was weaned in drylot

5

pens. Gains for pasture weaned calves were near 4 pounds per day and only 1.2 lb. for drylot calves during the first 7-9 days post-weaning. During the fall of 2013, Lehmkuhler worked with a produc-er in Anderson County where calves were weaned on pasture with supplement. Calves gained about 2.25 lb./d the first 19 days after weaning. Other studies have shown that pasture weaning is an ef-fective way to keep beef calves healthy and productive during the weaning process.

Weaning calves on pasture is an option for cow-calf producers in Kentucky which can improve health and performance of calves dur-ing the weaning period. For this method to be successful, planning has to be done in advance regarding pasture quality and availabil-ity. Providing calves with a high quality forage and a clean environ-ment is critical to performance during weaning. When weaning try to keep the stress at a minimum to improve animal health and per-formance.

Bug proof your house this fall Lee Townsend and Mike Potter, UK entomologists

You may have noticed your home being invaded by an assortment of pests this fall, including Asian lady beetles, boxelder bugs, crick-ets, spiders and black soldier beetle larvae. These creatures typi-cally visit homes that provide easy entry this time of year, often seeking refuge from changing weather.

Pest proofing your home is the most efficient way to keep these crit-ters out. A swatter, broom or vacuum cleaner and trash container will take care of pests that occasionally wander indoors. It’s best to deal with boxelder bugs and lady beetles outside, before they enter your home.

Following these guidelines will help pest proof your home or place of business and some may even help you conserve energy and in-crease the comfort level this fall and winter.

Install door sweeps or thresholds at the base of all exterior entry doors, paying particular attention to the bottom corners that are a common entry location. Insects and spiders can enter through a gap of one-sixteenth of an inch or less. Get down on the floor and check for light entering under doors; this indicates possible pest en-tryways.

To close other potential pest entries, apply caulk on the bottom out-side edges and sides of door thresholds; fit garage doors with a

6

rubber bottom seal because vinyl doesn’t seal well in the winter; and line the bottom track of sliding glass doors with foam weather stripping ½ to ¾ inch wide to seal any gaps.

Utility openings where pipes and wires enter the foundation and siding are common entry points for spiders, ants, yellowjackets and rodents. You can use caulk, cement, urethane expandable foam, steel wool and copper mesh to plug openings around outdoor fau-cets, receptacles, gas meters, clothes dryer vents and telephone or cable television wires.

Apply a good-quality silicone or acrylic latex caulk to cracks around windows, doors, fascia boards and other openings. Before you ap-ply the caulk, clean existing caulk, and remove any that’s peeling to aid adhesion. Be sure to use a good caulking gun. Desirable features are a back-off trigger to stop caulk when desired, a built-in “slicer” to remove the tip from new caulking tubes, and a nail to puncture the seal within. These guns are available for less than $10.

To reduce the entry of lady beetles, cluster flies and other overwin-tering pests, repair gaps and tears in window and door screens. Keep windows closed when adults are emerging to prevent entry. Repairing screens also will keep out flies, gnats, mosquitoes and midges next summer.

Another way to prevent pest entry is to apply an exterior barrier treatment with insecticides. To gain the most from this effort, apply long-lasting liquid formulations that contain synthetic pyrethroids. These products are available at some hardware, lawn and garden shops.

If you apply the barrier treatment, use a compressed air or hose-end sprayer to treat the base of all exterior doors, garage, crawl space entrances, foundation vents, utility openings and beneath siding. It’s also useful to treat the outside perimeter of the founda-tion with a two- to six-foot wide band along the ground and two to three feet up the foundation wall.

If you prefer not to tackle these pest-proofing activities, contact a professional pest control firm. Many firms are beginning to offer pest-proofing services.

7

Kentucky Beef Checkoff Referendum

Slated for November 20th

November 1, 2014—Lexington, KY— As the largest cattle producing state east of the Mississippi River, Kentucky is home to over 1.1 mil-lion beef cows and over 38,000 cattle producers. That results in cash receipts for the sale of cattle and calves in 2012 totaling over $656.7 million (National Agriculture Statistics Service).

November 1, 2014—Lexington, KY— As the largest cattle producing state east of the Mississippi River, Kentucky is home to over 1.1 mil-lion beef cows and over 38,000 cattle producers. That results in cash receipts for the sale of cattle and calves in 2012 totaling over $656.7 million (National Agriculture Statistics Service).

On November 20th, Kentucky beef and dairy producers that are en-gaged in the production of bovine animals on a commercial basis will have the opportunity to vote in a referendum to establish a Ken-tucky Beef Checkoff through collection of a $1.00 per head sold. A “uniquely Kentucky” program, the checkoff, if passed, would be funded by Kentucky producers and spent by Kentucky producers in the areas of education, research, promotion, global marketing and market development. The referendum will take place at local Ken-tucky Cooperative Extension Offices from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., local time.

To date, promotional efforts through the Federal Beef Checkoff found that for each dollar invested by farmers into beef checkoff ac-tivities from 2006 – 2013, $11.20 was returned to beef industry pro-ducer profit. In the state of Kentucky, beef education and promotion efforts in just 2013-2014 alone resulted in reaching over 650,000 consumers through a Summer Media Tour, extensive retail and res-taurant training efforts and a total beef tonnage increase of over 33% on three lean cuts, at grocery retailer, Kroger.

Creating a Kentucky Beef Checkoff not only allows Kentucky pro-ducers to focus promotional and educational efforts close to home, but gives Kentucky cattlemen the opportunity to share their story. “Promotion is important, but for me, supporting the Kentucky Beef Checkoff is all about who is defining our industry,” Grayson County Cattleman Russell Hackley shares. “Someone has to speak for the beef and cattle industry, and it should be us.”

The Kentucky Beef Checkoff program is different and separate from

8

the current Federal Beef Checkoff efforts. The Kentucky Beef Checkoff program may complement and extend the Federal Beef Checkoff, but unlike the federal program, the entire Kentucky Beef Checkoff would be managed by Kentucky beef producers.

For more information about the upcoming referendum, visit www.kybeefcheckoff.com.

Chronic Pneumonia in Stocker Calves due to Myco-

plasma bovis Dr. Michelle Arnold, UK Ruminant Extension Veterinarian

In an age of new, long-acting, and expensive high-powered antibi-otics, why do chronic pneumonia cases (“chronics”, “lungers”, “railers”) continue to occur? Perhaps more importantly, how should these chronic cases be managed in the face of record high prices for calves? Mycoplasma bovis is considered the bacteria most often responsible for the development of chronic pneumonia in stocker and feeder operations. While the bacteria Mannheimia hemolytica is the most frequent cause of the dramatic pneumonia signs of high fever, depression, anorexia and rapid death, Myco-plasma bovis (M. bovis) is the smoldering fire that continues to send calves back to the treatment pen. M. bovis is now regarded as a major cause of Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex (BRDC) and lameness in beef cattle. It is normally found in the nasal pas-sages of healthy calves but with stress such as transportation and commingling, it descends into the lungs and the problems begin. However, recent studies suggest that the M. bovis pulmonary in-fection observed during BRD outbreaks occurring early in the feed-ing period are primarily due to calf-to-calf transmission of one clone among the cattle. The organism has several unique mecha-nisms allowing it to dodge the immune system and actually sup-press the calf’s normal response to disease. Once in the lungs, it can travel to the bloodstream then to joints, organs, and nerves. These calves generally stay relatively alert with a fair appetite and are seldom treated early. It may take 7-14 days after lung infection before a calf shows dramatic clinical signs and, by that time, per-manent damage has occurred in the lungs.

Transmission: In general, infection with Mycoplasma is consid-ered low in preweaned calves, typically reported between 0-7%. However, infection is much more widespread once cattle reach a feedlot situation; after 2 weeks on feed, studies suggest 40-100%

9

of calves will carry the organism. The disease is spread by close and repeated contact with nasal secretions of infected calves, es-pecially in areas with poor ventilation and overcrowded facilities. The source of the M. bovis clones that spread among pen mates is either newly acquired calves or chronic calves housed in neighbor-ing pens. Some evidence suggests that transportation and other stressors (such as weaning, commingling, or extreme weather) in-creases shedding and therefore spread of the organism. Historical-ly, the environment (watering troughs, feed bunks, bedding) has not been considered a major risk factor for spread of disease but new evidence has shown that M. bovis can persist longer under adverse conditions than previously thought and may actually be more virulent in this state.

Clinical Signs: Few, if any, clinical signs exist that allow differenti-ation of M. bovis pneumonia from other causes of pneumonia at first treatment. Cattle are typically pulled for evaluation and treat-ment based on one or more of the following signs: depression, separation from the group, lack of rumen fill or “gutted” appear-ance, persistent cough, excessive nasal discharge and difficult or rapid breathing. Respiratory disease with fever of 104°F or above confirms the diagnosis. However, certain clinical signs strongly suggest M. bovis involvement.

Typical signs of pneumonia due to Mycoplasma bovis include one or more of the following:

Late Pneumonia-Usually 3-4 weeks after arrival to the back-grounder/ stocker operation/feedlot or 1-2 weeks after an initial case of pneumonia

Initially treated as routine case of respiratory disease (BRD) but calf does not respond to antibiotic treatment or suffers repeated relapses of pneumonia after antibiotic therapy.

Moderate fever/ Occasional cough

Development of lameness with swelling and pain in one or more joints, commonly the stifle, carpus (“knee”), hock and elbow. Many cases of pneumonia appear to respond to therapy but de-velop lameness without reappearance of the respiratory compo-nent.

Extreme weight loss (Wasting or “cachectic”)

A small percentage develop ear infections with drooped ear that

10

occasionally drain pus.

Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumonia is challenging and is usually based on history of repeated antibiotic therapy and clinical signs of chronic pneumonia and arthritis. It is common to find the organism in nasal passages and the conjunctiva of healthy calves. Only lung tissue or fluid removed from the lung can be used to reliably deter-mine whether an individual calf’s lung is affected or not. The diag-nosis can be made most reliably at necropsy if Mycoplasma bovis is cultured in an animal with caseonecrotic (dry, crumbly) lung le-sions. Arthritis is present in 15%-50% of cases with the stifle joint most commonly affected. Mixed lung infections with other disease- causing bacteria such as Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni are common in the field but anti-biotic therapy may eliminate these other bacteria that initiated dis-ease.

Caseonecrotic lung lesions of Mycoplasma bovis

Treatment: Response to antibiotic treatment is variable and fre-quently unrewarding. Mycoplasma organisms are very small and have no cell wall; therefore they are unaffected by penicillin and other “beta lactams” (Polyflex, Excenel, Excede, Naxcel) that kill bacteria by destroying the cell wall. They are also very capable of mutating (changing their genetic makeup) in order to survive other types of antibiotics. Currently Draxxin, Baytril and Resflor (available by prescription only) are FDA approved to treat Myco-plasma pneumonia. Use of other antibiotics is considered “Extra label” and requires a valid veterinary/client/patient relationship. Response to therapy may be fair at best because of limited drug distribution into the lung lesions where the bacteria are concentrat-ed.

The two most important factors to keep in mind regarding treatment are:

Early recognition and treatment and timely assessment of re-sponse to therapy is crucial.

Prolonged treatment is necessary (continuous therapeutic lev-els for 10-14 days). The feed additive Chlortetracycline (CTC) is often used for extended therapy after an injectable antibiotic.

Prevention depends on sound biosecurity and biocontainment practices. Because M. bovis pneumonia or polyarthritis may devel-op secondary to other viral or bacterial pathogens, control should

11

begin with minimizing the effect of well-recognized factors predis-posing to BRD. Stress plays a major role in disease through im-munosuppression so excellent nutrition, vaccination protocols and management are critical. The commercially available Mycoplasma vaccine is not currently considered effective although further re-search must be done under field conditions to determine if there is any benefit. Consult with your local veterinarian for the best man-agement plan for your operation.

The following steps should reduce the risk of Mycoplasma pneu-monia in stockers:

Vaccination with a 5 way respiratory virus vaccine. Cattle with low antibody titers to the BVD virus are much more prone to respirato-ry disease.

Cattle with extremely low blood levels of the trace elements sele-nium and copper have difficulty fighting any disease challenge. An injectable trace mineral supplement is often needed to boost the copper and selenium levels during the initial arrival period.

Metaphylactic treatment (treatment of all calves on arrival) of high risk calves with long-acting antibiotics is a well-established, bene-ficial procedure that can reduce morbidity (sickness) and case fa-tality (death) by up to 50%. Be aware that overconfidence in and reliance on metaphylaxis and long-acting antibiotics can lead to delayed follow-up treatment if clinical signs are not adequately monitored for a long period of time.

Keeping chronically ill calves away from calves treated for the first time should minimize the spread of Mycoplasma.

Eliminating exposure by reducing unnecessary traffic through the farm, isolating new arrivals, and treating sick cattle early will help reduce the risk of disease.

Buying preconditioned calves that have been vaccinated for res-piratory diseases (especially BVD) and dewormed will help mini-mize losses to the producer.

USDA NRCS in Kentucky Announces First Applica-tion Cut-Off Period for the Environmental Quality In-

centives Program (EQIP) will be November 21, 2014

The USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in Kentucky is encouraging landowners, farmers and producers to

12

visit their local NRCS office now to receive information and apply for conservation technical assistance and possible financial fund-ing opportunities.

The application process for NRCS’s conservation programs is con-tinuous, but funding selections for specific programs are made throughout the year. For the Environmental Quality Incentives Pro-gram (EQIP) the first application cutoff period date for considera-tion for 2015 funds is November 21, 2014. Applications received after November 21, 2014, will be held until the next application cut off period, which will be March 20, 2015.

EQIP is a conservation program that provides financial and tech-nical assistance to farmers and ranchers who face threats to soil, water, air, and related natural resources on their land. Through EQIP, NRCS develops contracts with agricultural producers to vol-untarily implement conservation practices. Persons engaged in livestock or agricultural production and owners of non-industrial private forestland are eligible for this program. Eligible land in-cludes cropland, pastureland, private non-industrial forestland, and other farm or ranch lands.

EQIP offers several National and State Initiatives which include the Seasonal High Tunnel Initiative, Organic Initiative, On-Farm Energy Initiative, Wildlife Initiative, and Forestry Initiative. Interest-ed land users should visit their local NRCS Office to find out what opportunities are available through each of these EQIP Initiatives.

“We’re getting an earlier start on EQIP contracts this year to give farmers more time to install practices,” said Deena Wheby, assis-tant state conservationist for programs.

All recipients of assistance are required to develop a conservation plan. Conservation planning is an integral part of the conservation process. Landowners should work with a conservation planner to develop the plan based on the landowner’s operational goals to improve the productivity, sustainability and profitability of their op-eration.

“Good conservation planning helps us identify the practices that will best address a landuser’s resource concerns,” Wheby said. The conservation plan will serve as a roadmap to a variety of tech-nical assistance and financial assistance through EQIP as well as .

13

other options available to the landowner.

For more information visit NRCS on the web at

www.ky.nrcs.usda.gov or contact your local NRCS service cen-

ter at 502/348-3363. http://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/

app

Equipment Manager

The Nelson County Conservation District is looking for an Equip-ment Manager. Our Equipment Manager, Allen Abell has decided to retire. We have four pieces of equipment. Two no-till drills, one hay bale wrapper and one aerator. If you are interested and would like more information please call the Conservation District office at 502-348-3363.

14

MANAGING BEEF CATTLE IN

CONFINEMENT CONFERENCE

15

NO

NP

RO

FIT

OR

G

US

PO

ST

AG

E P

AID

BA

RD

ST

OW

N, K

Y

PE

RM

IT #

028

Co

op

era

tive

Ex

ten

sio

n S

erv

ice

Univ

ers

ity o

f K

en

tucky

Nels

on

Co

unty

31

7 S

ou

th T

hir

d S

tre

et

Ba

rdsto

wn,

KY

40

00

4

R

ETU

RN

SER

VIC

E R

EQU

ESTE

D