2014 MNSHRM I-9[2]
-
Upload
ryan-hatton -
Category
Documents
-
view
87 -
download
0
Transcript of 2014 MNSHRM I-9[2]
Introduction
Speaker background Session Overview
Employer’s Duty to Complete and Maintain Form I-9
Common Errors and istakes Recommended Compliance Policy Provisions Benefits of External Audit Responding to Enforcement Action
Duty to Complete and Maintain 7th Edition– mandatory use May 2013 The new form is 2 pages
Page one completed by new hire no later than first day of work for pay
Section 2 on page 2 completed by employer no later than 3rd business day the employee starts work for pay
Section 3 on page 2 completed only if work authorization expires
Section1
Employer Responsible to Verify: Employee provided information in all required
fields Employee signed and dated the form Ensure preparer/translator section has been
completed, signed and dated (same date as employees signed) if applicable
Note whether employee indicated whether employment authorization will expire
Section 2, Employer Review and Verification Employer responsible for completing section
2 and must physically examine the documents presented by the employee, and sign the form.
Documents Lists: A – identity & authorization B – identity only C – work authorization only
Examining Documents
If new employee presents documents that do not appear to be genuine, reject the document and ask for other documents that satisfy the requirements.
If employee writes name that differs from documents, ask employee for reason for difference.
Attach a memo to I-9 explaining discrepancy
Section 3, Reverification and Rehires Employer may complete Section 3 when:
Employee’s employment authorization or documentation of employment authorization has expired
Your employee is rehired within 3 years of the date that Form I-9 was originally completed
Your employee changes his or her name
Correcting Form I-9
Employers may only correct errors made in Sections 2 or 3
If you discover an error is Section 1, ask the employee to correct the error
The best way to correct the form is to: Draw a line through the incorrect information Enter the correct information Initial and date the correction
Retaining Form I-9
Date employee began work for hire Add three years to that date: X
Date employment was terminated Add one year to that date: Y
Which date is later: X or Y? Employer must retain I-9 the later of the two
dates.
Storing Form I-9
No matter how you choose to store Form I-9, you must be able to present to government officials within 3 days.
Original Paper or Electronic Include controls to ensure the integrity,
accuracy and reliability of ESS. Include controls to ensure an audit trail so
that any alteration or change can be accessed
Common Errors and Mistakes M&D Masonry Case Study March 11, 2014, OCAHO assessed penalty
of $228,000 to a Georgia construction contractor based on a 2010 audit.
M&D produced 342 I-9s as result of NOI. ICE issued NIF alleging 339 violations
87 failures to prepare and/or present I-9s 252 violations for failures related to Sections 1 & 2
Common Errors and Mistakes OCAHO’s decision detailed the errors found
on the 252 Form I-9s:
34 failures to ensure employees signed the attestation in Section 1
60 failures to ensure employees checked the status box in Section 1
3 failures to ensure employees checked only one status box in Section 1
Common Errors and Mistakes
10 failures to ensure employees who attested to status as lawful permanent residents entered their respective alien numbers (A#)
81 occasions where the employer representative failed to sign Section 2
21 occasions where the employer failed to record the issuing authority for a List B document (driver’s license)
25 employer failures to provide the document number for a List A, B or C document
Common Errors and Mistakes
7 occasions where the employer recorded unacceptable documents or provided insufficient information about a document
Based upon an 84% error rate, ICE assessed a baseline penalty of $935 for each violation. ICE enhanced the penalty 10% due to seriousness of violation and the employer’s large size, and reduced the penalty by 5% for good faith.
Compliance Policy Provisions
Developing and implementing a written Form I-9 Compliance Policy is critical. Five essential elements: Who is in charge of I-9 Compliance How to complete the form to avoid common
mistakes Should supporting I-9 documents be retained Is the company using (or required to use) E-Verify How should I-9 forms be stored and purged
Compliance Policy Provisions Appoint an I-9 Responsible Officer
The larger the number of employees involved in the I-9 process, the larger the I-9 error rate
RO last person to view I-9 before it is recorded in any tickler system and filed
RO authority to go to HR employee who completed Section 2 to correct any mistakes/omissions
Maintain purge and re-verification
Compliance Policy Provisions
Mandate semi-annual training for all HR employees that are tasked with completing Section 2.
Review and revise all I-9 Reverification Procedures
Conduct Annual Voluntary I-9 Audits
Benefits of External Audits
Historically self-auditing does not typically reduce fines, and often result in additional liability exposure caused by mistakes such as: Redoing all I-9s and throwing away originals Separating document copies from Form I-9s Making corrections without initialing and dating Inserting backdated information Failure to complete audit
Benefits of External Audits External audit performed by counsel can:
Identify forms that need corrections and provide a forum for all corrections to be made
Provide statistics on form error rates, instances of particular errors, and incidences of errors for staff members responsible for completing the form
Estimate civil fine liability Uncover undocumented workers and missing I-9s Identify I-9 forms that can be legally purged
Benefits of External Audits
Properly completed external audit can provide good-faith defense to ICE audit
Start 5 year statute of limitations on corrected substantive errors
Audit results may be protected from disclosure under work product doctrine
Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Responding to Enforcement Action Department of Homeland Security (ICE/HSI) Office of Special Counsel for Immigration
Related Unfair Labor Practices Department of Labor
Employers will generally receive a written Notice of Inspection (NOI) at least three days before the inspection Contact LEGAL!!! Can obtain additional time
Responding to Enforcement Action Employer must retrieve and reproduce
electronically stored I-9s Provide officer with necessary hardware and
software to inspect electronic documents Provide any existing electronic summary of
the information recorded on I-9s Produce retained original paper Forms I-9
and any related documents
Responding to Enforcement Action Notice of Inspection Results – “compliance
letter” Notice of Suspect Documents Notice of Discrepancies Notice of Technical or Procedural Failures Warning Notice Notice of Intent to Fine
Responding to Enforcement Action
Companies may attempt to negotiate reduced finesRequest review of fine by administrative law judge (OCAHO) within 30 days of receipt of NIFAppeal OCAHO decision to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
For Further Information Contact
Ryan J. Hatton
Halleland Habicht
33 South Sixth Street, Suite 3900
Minneapolis, MN 55402
612-836-5504