2014 09 08 Vanyo Diversion Authority Concessions

download 2014 09 08 Vanyo Diversion Authority Concessions

of 3

Transcript of 2014 09 08 Vanyo Diversion Authority Concessions

  • 8/11/2019 2014 09 08 Vanyo Diversion Authority Concessions

    1/3

    ID

    FLOOD

    dNP

    DIVERSION

    A

    U

    T H

    O

    R T Y

    211

    9thStreet South, P. O.

    Box 2806, Fargo,

    ND 58108-2806

    Phone

    701-

    241-

    5600 Fax 701-241-

    5728

    September 8,

    2014

    The

    Honorable

    Mark

    Dayton

    Governor Mark Dayton

    116 Veterans Service Building

    20

    West 12th

    St.

    St. Paul, MN 55155

    Dear Governor

    Dayton,

    T h ank you for visiting our

    community,

    an d

    for

    the

    opportunity to discuss the

    Fargo-

    Moorhead Flood

    Control

    Project.

    Your

    presence here, and

    the

    sometimes spirited debate that ensued, provided a

    constructive step in

    the

    process

    of

    resolving some of the issues

    that have

    created concerns. While

    reasonable

    minds

    can agree to disagree about some of the issues, we were heartened to

    hear you

    re

    your statement on Point of View that it

    is

    near ly unan imous that some

    form of

    long

    term

    diversion

    proect

    is

    needed

    W e

    ca n probably

    a lso a gree

    that no matter what the final design of that permanent

    protection

    may

    turn

    out to be some

    people

    are likely going to be

    unhappy, and

    as much as

    wish

    could

    promise we

    ca n

    make

    everyone

    happy, suspect we

    never

    will be able to do that.

    But we also heard loud

    and

    clear, your concern that we had not adequately respected Mnnesota

    s

    process. expaned

    a

    our

    meeting

    that

    this

    was

    certainly

    no

    our intention.

    am also

    reaching

    out to

    yo u

    to

    se e if we

    can

    improve on

    that,

    starting

    with

    a number of commitments

    that am prepared to

    advocaethat

    the

    Diversion

    Authority

    adop. We hope that

    you

    will agree that

    these commitments

    demonstrate our good faith. While we are optimistic that

    Congress

    sees the enormous

    value

    ofwhat

    is

    literally

    a once-

    in-

    a - lifetime opportunity

    to obtain

    permanent

    flood protection, we

    hope

    you

    agree that

    any continued disagreement at the loca l leve l sends the wrong signal.

    Limiting

    Work onthe OHB levees to100

    year

    proectionuntil the

    EIS

    is compee

    The

    Diversion

    Authority,

    in

    consultation with

    Oxbow would

    agree

    to limit

    levee

    construction

    to

    those features

    that

    provide 100

    year

    protection from natural floods until the Minnesota EIS is

    finished.

    Although

    there

    does

    not appear to be

    an y

    engineering dispute that full construction of the OHB

    levee

    would not have

    an y

    impact on Mnnesota, this would allow continued progress

    on

    an

    existing need, while

    addressing the

    concerns

    abou levee

    work

    getting

    aheadofMinnesota'

    s processes.

  • 8/11/2019 2014 09 08 Vanyo Diversion Authority Concessions

    2/3

    The

    Honorable Mark Dayton

    September

    8, 2014

    Page 2

    Delaying

    Construction

    of

    the

    Diversion

    Channel until

    the EIS

    is

    compee

    T he

    Diversion

    Authority

    would

    agree

    to not commence

    actual

    construction of any portion of the

    channel assigned

    to it for work-

    in-

    kind contribution until the MD N R finishes its

    review

    with the unders tand ing

    that

    the M DN R will

    agree to use its best efforts to have a final E IS completed b y J uly 1 ,

    2015.

    W e think it is fair to note that

    even that

    date is

    over 7 months after the

    M D NR

    is legally obligated to have completed its review.

    dding

    Broader Geograph ic

    epresentation

    to the Diversion

    Authority

    Board.

    T he

    Diversion Authority

    would

    agree

    to

    ad d

    representation from a

    broader

    geographic area including upstream Mnnesota

    interests.

    M innesota actua lly

    has

    greater

    representation

    on th e current Diversion Authority

    Board than

    would be expected b ased on

    funding

    contributions, but am prepared to propose

    adjustments

    that

    woud

    provdea

    sea

    a the

    table

    for

    areas no

    currently

    represented

    This

    would

    be

    with

    the

    understanding

    that any additional member(s ) would recuse

    themselves

    from closed session discussions

    of any litigation in which they have an interest such as the

    pending

    litigation

    commenced

    by

    the

    Richland/

    Wilkin

    JPA..

    S h ou ld a ny relevant

    litigation

    end

    this

    condition

    would also

    end.

    In addition to

    Board

    representation, will advocate that the

    B oard m ake

    additional

    visits to outlying

    affected

    areas.

    There

    wa s

    extensive outreach during the federal

    environmental

    review

    and d esig n

    process,

    and

    will

    advocate

    additional

    measures

    through

    completion

    of the

    Minnesota process.

    Expediting

    the

    Resolution of

    the

    Pending

    Litigation.

    The

    Diversion

    Authority

    agrees

    to us e its

    best

    efforts to seek

    a

    prompt resolution

    of

    the litigation commenced against it by the JPA starting

    with a

    letter

    to

    the

    court

    requesting

    an

    immediate

    status conference

    to

    discuss

    how best

    to

    do

    that.

    am

    making these commitments with the clear understanding that we

    have not

    been given assurance

    that you will not pursue your ongoing

    efforts

    to block funding for the

    project,

    but will ask yo u to

    consider that step. A s noted earlier, we might not be able to

    agree on

    everything even after we take al l

    of

    the

    steps

    have outlined

    above,

    but

    hope we can agree that

    we

    are

    all better

    served if

    we can obtain

    permanent

    flood control

    for our communities as soon as possible.

    S i n c e J

    Th

    Darrell Vanyo

    Fargo-Moorhead Diversion

    Authority

    Chairman

  • 8/11/2019 2014 09 08 Vanyo Diversion Authority Concessions

    3/3

    The Honorable Mark Dayton

    September 8, 2014

    Page

    3

    cc:

    Assistant Secretary

    Jo-

    Ellen

    Darcy

    Senator

    John

    Hoeven

    Senator Heidi

    Heitkamp

    Senator Amy

    Klobuchar

    Senator Al Franken

    Congressman

    Kevin Cramer

    Congressman Collin Peterson

    Congresswoman

    Betty McCollum

    Congressman

    John Kline

    Congressman Tim

    Walz

    Congresswoman

    Michele

    Bachmann

    Congressman Keith Ellison

    Congressman

    Erik Paulsen

    Congressman Rick Nolan

    Governor Jack Dalrymple

    Senator

    Kent Eken

    Senator Torrey Westrom

    Representative

    Ben

    Lien

    Representative Paul Marquart

    Representative Jay McNamar

    DNR CommissionerTom

    Landwehr

    Lt.

    General Thomas Bostick,

    Chief

    of

    Engineers,

    U S Army

    Corps

    of

    Engineers

    Mr.

    Shaun

    Donovan, Director,

    Office

    of

    Management Budget,

    the

    White

    House