2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium
-
Upload
petra-fisser -
Category
Education
-
view
2.503 -
download
0
description
Transcript of 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium
![Page 1: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
TPACK Symposium “Artifacts demonstrating
teachers’ technology integration competencies”
Joke Voogt, Petra Fisser, Johan van Braak, Liesbet Verplanken, Maaike Heitink, Ayoub Kafyulilo, Douglas Agyei, Matthew J.
Koehler, Joshua Rosenberg, Spencer Greenhalgh, Andrea Zellner, Punya Mishra, Denise Schmidt-Crawford
SITE, 19 March 2014
![Page 2: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
International symposium
O 2010: Strategies for teacher professional development on TPACK
O 2011: Teachers’ assessment of TPACK: Where are we and what is needed?
O 2012: Developing TPACK around the world: Probing the framework even as we apply it
O 2013: Measuring TPACK
O 2014: Artifacts demonstrating teachers’ technology integration competencies
![Page 3: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Ghana
Iowa State
Tanzania
The Netherlands Belgium
Michigan State
![Page 5: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Part 1 O Introduction to the symposium – Joke Voogt
O The potential of video clips to demonstrate TPACK Petra Fisser, National Institute for Curriculum Development, the Netherlands, Joke Voogt, University of Amsterdam/ Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands, Johan van Braak & Liesbet Verplanken, Ghent University, Belgium, Maaike Heitink, University of Twente, the Netherlands
O Developing TPACK through Learning Outcomes: The Case of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers in Ghana Douglas Agyei, University of Cape Coast, Ghana, Joke Voogt, University of Amsterdam/ Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands
O Discussion with the Audience
![Page 6: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Part 2 O Introduction to the symposium – Joke Voogt
O Developing technology integration knowledge and skills of the pre-service and in-service teachers through collaborative design in teams Ayoub Kafyulilo, Dar es salaam University College of Education, Tanzania , Petra Fisser, National Institute for Curriculum Development, The Netherlands, Joke Voogt, University of Amsterdam/ Windesheim University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands
O Can portfolio-based assessments demonstrate teachers’ TPACK? Matthew J. Koehler, Joshua Rosenberg, Spencer Greenhalgh, Andrea Zellner, Punya Mishra, Michigan State University
O Discussant: Denise Schmidt-Crawford
O Discussion with the Audience
![Page 7: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Joke Voogt (UvA/
Windesheim)
Johan van Braak (UG)
Liesbet Verplanken (UG) Maaike Heitink (UT)
Amber Walraven (ITS) Petra Fisser (SLO)
The team
8 SITE 2014
![Page 9: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The reason for the study
0 A teacher’s technology integration depends on TPACK (knowledge and skills), beliefs and experiences
0 Is often determined by self report measures in large scale surveys
Or
0 Through observations is small-scale studies
SITE 2014 9
![Page 10: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Purpose of the study
0 To explore the potential of videoclips to determine teachers’ competency to integrate technology in a sound way
0 Combining the depth of observations with a reasonable large sample
SITE 2014 10
![Page 11: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
A teacher’s technology integration competency
0 Competency : the integration of knowledge, skill and attitude
0 Constitutes of the knowledge and skills (TPACK) , beliefs, self
efficacy and experiences of teachers
0 Can be demonstrated by the wau a teacher acts in the classroom (pedagogy) with respect to technology and the capability to reason professionally about his/ her acting.
Brief 0 We wanted to know how teachers integrate technology and why
they do what they do
SITE 2014 11
![Page 12: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Knowledge & Skills (TPACK)
• Experiences
• Beliefs
• Self efficacy
Professional
Reasoning
Characteristics of
the
teaching/learning
practice
Contribution to
effective teaching
& learning
Context
Technology Integration Competency
Why a teacher
acts this way.
How a teacher
designs his/her
practice
…concerning
techhnology in
education
SITE 2014 12
The Analysis Model
![Page 13: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Professional Reasoning
Subject
matter
Student
characteristics
Learning
processes
Goals
Curriculum
Instruction
http://www.evolllution.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/reflective-teaching.jpg
SITE 2014 13
Conceptual
understanding
Meijer, 1999
![Page 14: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Characteristics of effective teaching 0 Classroom management 0 Time on task 0 Well organized learning environment 0 Clearly structured teaching 0 Fostering active learning 0 Challenging and engaging 0 Fostering collaboration and respect betweenstudents and teachers 0 Learning to learn 0 Providing feedback/ formative assessment 0 Summative assessment 0 Time to practice 0 Learning resources 0 Personalized learning 0 Learning in authentic settings
Scheerens, 2008; Dede, 2000; Voogt, 2008; Ertmer, 2012
SITE 2014 14
![Page 15: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Knowledge & Skills (TPACK)
• Experiences
• Beliefs
• Self efficacy
Professional
Reasoning
Characteristics of
the
teaching/learning
practice
Contribution to
effective teaching
& learning
Context
Technology Integration Competency
Why a teacher
acts this way.
How a teacher
designs his/het
practice
…concerning
techhnology in
education
SITE 2014 15
The Analysis Model
![Page 16: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Research Questions
0How can the examples be characterized in terms of effective teaching and learning with technology?
0How can teachers’ professional reasoning related to technology integration be characterized?
SITE 2014 16
![Page 17: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Method
0 Teachers were invited to submit videocases (N=157) 0 According to a protocol (introduction – practice –
reflection) 0 Each videocase is about 10-12 minutes
0 Additional questionnaires TPACK-core, ICT skills,
Beliefs (N=129) linked to the videocases
0 We checked the characteristics of our sample with a national benchmark
SITE 2014 17
![Page 18: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Observation checklist
SITE 2014 18
0 The context
0 Hard- & software
0 Characteristics of teaching/learning activities
0 Curriculum characteristics
0 Grouping
0 Teacher role
0 Student role
0 Who’s in control
0 Assessment/ Feedbacke
0 Technology integration
0 Fit (TPACK)
0 Non-essential, supportive, essential use of technology
0 Added value 0 Fit (TPACK) 0 Student characteristics 0 Learning processes 0 Goals 0 Curriculum 0 Instruction 0 Interaction 0 Costs & Benefits 0 Monitoring student
learning
Professional Reasoning about
Teaching and learning practice (observed)
![Page 19: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Fit (professional reasoning & practice)
0 Fit: the technology strengthens the content, pedagogy, or both
0 Scoring:
0 No fit
0 The technology strengthens the content
0 The technology strengthens the pedagogy
0 The technology strengthens the content & the pedagogy
Match: They do what they say professional reasoning ≈ practice
![Page 20: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Example
0 Video: Using an interactive white board and digital pictures to foster speaking skills during circle time in Kindergarten
SITE 2014 20
![Page 21: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Scoring observed teaching practice (partly)
Curriculum characteristics
0 Authentic setting
Grouping
0 Whole classroom teaching
Teacher role
0 Guide
Student role
0 Executor & Listener
Fit
0 The technology strengthens the content & the pedagogy
Use
0 Supportive use
SITE 2014 21
![Page 22: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Scoring Professional reasoning about (partly)
Added value
0 Motivating
0 Effective
Fit
0 The technology strengthens the content & the pedagogy
Learning processes
0 How technology helps students learn
SITE 2014
Match professional reasoning ≈ practice
![Page 23: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results In only half of the cases we observed a match between professional
reasoning and actual practice
Practice:
0 The videocases showed a limited perspective on technology integration competency
0 Technology use is mainly supportive but not essential in the teaching learning/process
0 Mainly focused on teacher-centered education 0 ICT is hardly being used in authentic settings, learning to learn, ( formative)
assessment Professional reasoning:
0 Teachers had limited language to reason about technology use
0 Facilitating learning processes
0 Realization of goals
0 Motivating students
SITE 2014 23
![Page 24: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Conclusions Indicators for technology integration competency are:
0 Technology is used to strengthen effective teaching
0 Technology is essential for realizing effective teaching
0 Match between TPACK (reasoning) & TPACK (practice)
Technology integration is more than TPACK, but being able to demonstrate TPACK in practice and reason
about TPACK is an important indicator of a technology integration competency
SITE 2014 24
![Page 25: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Next Steps
Using a selection of the video cases to develop an interactive module for (pre-service) teachers to help
them move to a pedagogy that fosters effective education in which technology is essential to realize
effectivity
SITE 2014 25
![Page 26: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
You want to know more?
Email us
0 Joke Voogt: [email protected]
0 Petra Fisser: [email protected]
SITE 2014 26
![Page 27: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Douglas Agyei
Department of Science & Mathematics Education University of Cape Coast, Ghana
&
Joke Voogt
Research Institute of Child Development and Education University of Amsterdam,, The Netherlands
27
![Page 28: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Poor student achievements (in mathematics)
High failure rate (More than 86% of failures to enter Tertiary
levels)
TIMSS 2003 & 2007 (43rd out of 44 & 46th out of 48)
Poor attitudes
Mathematics Teaching
Teacher-centred approach (Hardly any hands-on activities, Whole class teaching Lots of notes being copied )
Low cognitive learning (Concept formation at a more abstract level, Heavy emphasis on assessment)
28
![Page 29: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
A Longitudinal study to integrate technology in teaching mathematics (Ghana)
Two case studies of Professional Development (PD) in 2009 and 2010
Integration of the PD arrangement into a regular mathematics–specific IT course (2011)
TPACK Framework
ICT (spreadsheet) to promote in-depth maths concept formation
Activity-Based Learning (ABL) to make lesson less teacher-centred
29
![Page 30: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Make use of existing ICT tools
(Spreadsheet-specific)
Active involvement of learners (Activity Based Learning-ABL)
Explore connection between spreadsheet, ABL pedagogy and mathematical concept
TPACK Frame work -Interconnection of content pedagogy & technology (Mishra & Koehler,2006)
![Page 31: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Introductory workshop
(TDT,s, TPACK, Exemplary Materials, Co-plan activities,
Micro- teaching & Team discussions)
Design Period : Working in DT’s to:
- Identify mathematics topics (concept);
- Identify appropriate spreadsheet resources for the topic;
- Design & develop appropriate activities;
- Incorporate activities in lesson & planning instructional strategy
Implementation
- Designed actual class teaching try-out (peers)
- Real classroom teaching
Role of Researcher: Consultative
31
![Page 32: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Peer
Teaching
Real Classroom try-outs
(SHS)
Lesson N(190) School Level N(225)
Lesson
Duration
(Min)
Distance between two given points of a line (DBTGP) 32 A 1 43 40
Quadratic in Polynomial Form (QPF) 31 A 2 44 80
Quadratic in Vector Form (QVF) 34 B 2 36 80
Transformation by a Vector (TBV) 30 B 3 35 80
Graphs of Linear Equations (GLE) 31 C 1 25 40
Trigonometric Functions (TRIG) 32 C 3 42 80
32
![Page 33: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Video link
33
![Page 34: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
![Page 35: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
CALP Interview Observ.
Checklist
TPACK
Questionnaire
Instructional Plan ✓
Actual Classroom
Practices
✓
Self- Reported ✓ ✓
Assessment of the PD: Explore whether and how Prospective teachers integrate
technology or demonstrate TPACK in their Learning Outcomes.
Compare Prospective teachers TPACK (Instructional, reported, observed)
Effect levels and data collection
Note: CALP (Criteria for Analyzing Lesson Plan) inspired by : Harris, Grandgenett and Hofer (2010).
Observation Checklist inspired by : ISTE (2008) and Schmidt et al (2009)
35
![Page 36: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Quantitative Content Analysis (Berelson, 1952)
Categorizing and coding data based on TPACK (Koehler et al. 2007)
(Similar for Video data & Lesson Plans)
Points (marks) awarded based on CALP and observation Checklist
Systematic quantitative Analysis (Mainly descriptive)
Intercoder reliability result using Cohen’s kappa (k)
0.91 – 0.93 (for Lesson plans)
0.79 – 0.81 (for observational data)
36
![Page 37: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
LESSON PLAN EXAMPLE
Objectives for Lesson:
The students will be able to:
discover how the slope affects the graph of a line
relate k to the y-intercept of a line
determine the equation of a line given a and k
INTRODUCTION (10 minutes)
The graph of linear function y = ax + k has several properties. In this lesson, activities
have been designed to enable you guide students to discover how the slope (a) affects…
Prepare students for the following activities (Activities 1 to 4) by organizing them in
Small groups (2 to 3 student per group). Assign specific role to students in the group
(as presenter, recorder, and leader). Start the lesson by giving each group the Students’
Worksheet.
PROCEDURE (55 minutes)
ACTIVITY 1: The graph of the linear function of the form
Using spreadsheet, prepare the graph of by setting and before
beginning the lesson on an overhead projector.
PK
TCK
37
![Page 38: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
ACTIVITY 2: Varying the value of (set k = 0)
Begin by using the spreadsheet to plot the graph of and let students
observe the changes in the graph as the value of changes from positive to negative.
Ask students to describe the changes in the line as the value of increases
(e.g.
Discuss group results with students. Some discussion points could
a) represent the slope/gradient of the graph
b) When = 0 we have a straight line passing through the x-axis ( ).
c) The graphs of positive values of increases from left to right
d) The graphs of negative values of decreases from left to right
e) As the absolute value of increases the line becomes steeper and vice versa.
TPK
CK
38
![Page 39: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
T P A C K
T K
Linear functions in the slope intercept form
39
![Page 40: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Significant increases between pre- and post-test for all seven components of TPACK survey( Effect Size between 0.7 and 2.38)
Improved Teachers’ Instructional Plan (TPACK mean scores) observed with increasing number of teaching try-outs
Observed data (actual lesson enactment) particularly shows challenges/difficulties faced by target teachers
40
![Page 41: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
1. Problems exploring properties/nature of quadratics:
2. Problems exploring which graph is steeper:
Figure 2: a. Graph of: y = ax
2 + bx + k b. Graph of: y = mx + k
3. Difficulty reading mid points of two equations- “Zooming” allowed in-depth investigation
4. Verifying graphical solution set (from the spreadsheets) - “Increase decimal” button
41
![Page 42: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
2.00
2.10
2.20
2.30
2.40
2.50
2.60
2.70
TKCK
PK
PCK
TCK
TPK
TPAC
K
TPACK Domain
Mean Planned Practice
Observed Practice
Planned Instruction vs Actual Practice
42
![Page 43: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
Self Reported Instructional
Plan
Actual Practice
TPACK Assessment type
Mean
TK
CK
PK
PCK
TCK
TPK
TPACK
Results (3)
43
![Page 44: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Developed & improved teachers’ TPACK evident in all the data sources Learning outcomes (lesson plan & observed data) provided specific & concrete
representation of what they could do.
High score on expressed self-reported TPACK beliefs than instructional and actual practices (Teachers show high score of all components on TPACK survey ) – So & Kim, 2009
Teachers use of TPACK in practice differs from their planned
instruction Difficulties/challenges associated with teachers’ use of technology are
pronounced more in their actual lesson enactment
A combination of Lesson plans and actual lesson enactmetment is an effective way to assess TPACK but Self report is also a necessity.
44
![Page 46: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
DEVELOPING TPACK OF PRE-SERVICE
AND IN-SERVICE TEACHERS THROUGH
COLLABORATIVE DESIGN IN TEAMS
Ayoub C Kafyulilo, Dar es Salaam University College of Education, Tanzania
Petra Fisser, National Institute for Curriculum Development, the Netherlands
Joke Voogt, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
SITE (Jacksonville, FL)
19 March 2014
![Page 48: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
11 December 2013: Collaborative design in teams
to develop science and mathematics teachers’
technology integration knowledge and skills
![Page 49: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
![Page 50: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
INTRODUCTION
Initiatives to integrate technology in education in
Tanzania started in 1997
2007: integration of technology in teaching still
limited
Teaching of basic ICT skills (switching computers on and
off, word processing, basic internet applications)
Using the computer for secretarial and administrative
purposes
2010: hindering factors were analyzed
![Page 51: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
HINDERING FACTORS
Inadequate training and capacity, resulting in underutilization of technology facilities
Lack of awareness of the affordances of technology and how it can be used to address existing challenges of teaching and learning
Lack of skilled teachers to implement a technology-enhanced curriculum
Of all the factors, the inadequate training and lack of skilled teachers to implement technology-enhanced curriculum is crucial in Tanzania
![Page 52: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
![Page 53: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Professional development arrangement
A workshop on TPACK
Collaborative design in teams
Lesson implementation,
Reflection on the implemented lessons
Lesson re-design
for pre-service and in-service teachers
![Page 54: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
![Page 55: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Two important innovations for teachers in Tanzania
collaborative design in teams (offered as a professional
development arrangement) for developing technology
integration knowledge and skills
TPACK, which was adopted as a framework for
describing the pre-service and in-service teachers’
knowledge requirements for integrating technology into
their science and mathematics teaching
![Page 56: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The effect of the professional development
arrangement on the development of technology
integration knowledge and skills
The impact of collaborative design in teams on the
development of technology integration knowledge
and skills
The factors that affect the continuous use of
technology in teaching after the professional
development arrangement has ended
![Page 57: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
The effect of the professional development
arrangement on the development of technology
integration knowledge and skills
The impact of collaborative design in teams on the
development of technology integration knowledge
and skills
The factors that affect the continuous use of
technology in teaching after the professional
development arrangement has ended
![Page 58: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
METHODOLOGY
Design-based research with 4 studies
1. 22 pre-service teachers
2. 12 in-service teachers
3. 20 in-service teachers from two schools
4. 42 in-service and pre-service teachers
![Page 59: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
RESULTS (1ST STUDY)
The adoption of collaborative design in team was
effective for the development of pre-service
teachers’ technology integration knowledge and
skills
Results from the pre-service teachers’ perceptions
and classroom observation showed a significant
difference between pre and post intervention
![Page 60: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
RESULTS (1ST STUDY)
The adoption of collaborative design in team was
effective for the development of pre-service
teachers’ technology integration knowledge and
skills
Results from the pre-service teachers’ perceptions
and classroom observation showed a significant
difference between pre and post intervention
![Page 61: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
![Page 62: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
RESULTS (2ND STUDY)
Collaborative design in teams was adopted as the
main professional development arrangement for
the second study.
Significant increase in both observed and perceived
knowledge
The need for support emerged
![Page 63: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
RESULTS (2ND STUDY)
Collaborative design in teams was adopted as the
main professional development arrangement for
the second study.
Significant increase in both observed and perceived
knowledge
The need for support emerged
![Page 64: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Observed classroom practices with technology
An example of interactive lesson was demonstrated by the biology team
through the video they made about first aid provision to a fainting
person
During this lesson, a teacher was seating behind the classroom with
students and acted like a fellow learner but a leader to the discussion.
He made groups of five and assigned tasks to each group,
Each group made a presentation of their task to the colleagues in the
classroom
There was a great debate between students from different groups which
was reflecting on the video
![Page 65: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
RESULTS (3RD STUDY)
Teachers’ collaborative lesson design in teams was
supported through
The availability of an expert
Collaboration guidelines
Exemplary lessons
Online materials
Teachers were able to develop technology
integration knowledge and skills better
![Page 66: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
RESULTS (3RD STUDY)
Teachers’ collaborative lesson design in teams was
supported through
The availability of an expert
Collaboration guidelines
Exemplary lessons
Online materials
Teachers were able to develop technology
integration knowledge and skills better
![Page 67: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
RESULTS (4TH STUDY)
Years/months after the professional development
To investigate the continuous use of technology in
teaching
Several variables were studied:
Personal factors
Institutional factors
Professional development factors
Technological factors
![Page 68: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
RESULTS (4TH STUDY)
Only a few teachers continued to integrate
technology in their teaching
Professional development did not have a direct impact
on the continuous use of technology
Access to technology, ease of use, and support from
the management does have a direct impact
Professional development is a prerequisite to start
thinking about technology integration
![Page 69: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
RESULTS (4TH STUDY)
Only a few teachers continued to integrate
technology in their teaching
Professional development did not have a direct impact
on the continuous use of technology
Access to technology, ease of use, and support from
the management does have a direct impact
Professional development is a prerequisite to start
thinking about technology integration
![Page 70: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
CONCLUSION - GENERAL
Collaborative design in teams is an effective
professional development arrangement
Teachers’ development of technology integration
knowledge and skills is higher when there is support
The long term impact is determined by the
professional development arrangement, teachers’
knowledge and skills, accessibility to technology, ease
of use of technology, and management support
![Page 71: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
CONCLUSION - ARTIFACTS
Several instruments were used
Self-reported & observable measures
Artifacts: videos, lesson plans, classroom practice,
simulations, presentations, etc.
![Page 72: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
CONCLUSION - ARTIFACTS
Professional development
does increase TPACK (as measured with the instruments)
does not necessarily lead to continuous technology use..
Professional development & “prove” with artifacts alone is not enough!
![Page 73: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
HOW TO PROCEED?
Ayoub Kafyulilo, [email protected]
Petra Fisser, [email protected]
Joke Voogt, [email protected]
![Page 74: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
![Page 75: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Discussion Denise Schmidt-Crawford
![Page 76: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Artifacts Demonstrating Teachers’ Technology Integration
Competencies
Thank you to all presenters!
5th year Anniversary
TPACK Symposium
![Page 77: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
• Competencies
– (Europe): integrate knowledge and skills and attitude
– (USA): actual demonstration of skills learned (competency-based education)
• Artifacts – video cases, lesson plans, collaborative lesson design, portfolios
![Page 78: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Key TPACK Themes to Remember
• International perspective of TPACK research
• “Context” is still very important to TPACK – explain it well!
• Pedagogical approaches – (e.g., activity based learning, collaborative design in teams)
• Concrete representations of what teachers can do (e.g., lessons, portfolios, videos)
![Page 79: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
TPACK Common Ground
• Critical investigations of how to measure TPACK --- (using artifacts) – Methodologies & Analysis (multiple measures)
• Approaches to identifying how teachers enact TPACK – what does it “look like” in practice?
• Technology no longer stands alone – we have come a long way in 5 years…. In 8 years (Mishra & Koehler, 2006) – Professional practice, characteristics of effective
teaching, competency, reflective practice
• TPACK is not easy (wicked problem!) --- hindering factors
![Page 80: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Key Points to Take Away
• We are in the initial stages of explaining what TPACK “looks like” in different contexts.
• Technology can strengthen effective teaching – solid content knowledge & effective pedagogy.
• Importance of “Match” – Are teachers doing what they say (ie., self-report, lesson plans) they are doing (i.e., observations?
• We must keep the TPACK research momentum going…there is much more to investigate!
• Integration…. Innovation
![Page 81: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Questions to Consider
• How can we better connect theory to practice related to TPACK?
• How do we best structure or restructure our experiences in our teacher preparation programs while preparing TPACK teachers? How do we learn from what we already know?
• What are specific competencies that should be measured for TPACK?
• How do we (continue to…) measure TPACK? – What are the next steps? – formative & summative – reliable & valid measures and approaches
![Page 82: 2014-03-19 SITE TPACK Symposium](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051818/5497c1e1b479593d4d8b5294/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Looking forward to TPACK Symposium #6!